On Ethnicity, Culture, and Tribe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Ethnicity, Culture, and Tribe On Ethnicity, Culture, and ”Tribe” Sten Hagberg Purpose • Today’s lecture aims to discuss tricky concepts used in the study of African societies and cultures that still have tremendous impact on everyday life • Put forward the historical perspective on ”ethnicity”, ”culture”, and ”tribe”, as labels to portray traditional African political organization • Contextualise the texts by Evans-Pritchard, Southall, and Vail – as well as bring in how one could possibly study ethnicity today • Case-Study of Tiefo in Burkina Faso – ethnicity and politics in a home area association The term ”tribe” is no longer used by anthropologists, but it is used by many people in African countries Definitions • ”a group of people bound by common language, territory, and custom” • “a social division in a traditional society consisting of families or communities linked by social, economic, religious, or blood ties, with a common culture and dialect, typically having a recognized leader” • “a notional form of human social organization based on a set of smaller groups (known as bands), having temporary or permanent political integration, and defined by traditions of common descent, language, culture, and ideology” Tourist Industry and the Exotic – ”African Tribes with Traditional African Cultures” Republic of Niger – administrative categories, or How to define nomadic peoples http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/ner146499.pdf Customary or traditional communities according Nigerien Law • Fraction • Quartier • Village • Tribu • Groupement Woodabe men impressing women • Secteur • Canton • Sultanat or province Central Question: How do societies stay together? (Durkheim (1858-1917) and followers & successors) The Anthropology of Structural-Functionalists Functionalism • The study of how customs and social • Diminished the importance of organizations contributed to social solidarity individual behaviour – the social • The empirical focus – instead of speculating system was brought to the fore about history anthropologists wrote about • All societies had an understandable waht they actually observed rational – or logics • Focus on continuity and social reproduction • Explained historical continuity and rather than change social and political reproduction • ”…the social structure is the foundation of the whole social life of any continuing society” (Fortes 1953:22-3) The Nuer: Time and Space • State society and stateless society Sir Edward Evan Evans-Pritchard (1902- • Kinship and politics – the Nuers conceived 1973) together with young Nuers political relationships in terms of descent and lineage • Long-term fieldwork, learning the language – professional anthropology • Fieldwork and colonial administration • The concept of ”tribe”, dividing the world into ”the West”/”the others” • Evans-Pritchard’s analysis moved from strict empiricism towards the study of more structural, theoretical, organizing principles • The obsession of structure and function Segmentary lineage system à la Evans-Pritchard • Fission and the opposition of its e.g. The concept of cieng segments Cieng = homestead, hamlet, village, and • Fusion with other groups of its own tribal sections of various dimensions order in opposition to political segments larger than itself ”Thus a man is a member of his tribe in • its relation to other tribes, but he is not Political values are always, structurally a member of his tribe in the relation of speaking, in conflict his segment of it to other segments of the same kind. Likewise, a man is a member of his tribal segment in its relation to other segments, but he is not a member of it in relation of his village to other villages of the same segment.” (Evans-Pritchard in Grinker et al. 2010:81-82) Anthropology and Colonial Administration ”…administrators were interested in anthropological work on African political systems because the methods by which Africans governed themselves impinged directly on the ability of the colony to govern. […] British could invest chiefs with political responsibilities in those societies with a pre- existing system of chiefs, while for other societies without chiefs, such as the hunter-gatherers and farmers of central Africa, the Belgians had to create chiefdoms and chiefs” (Grinker et al. 2010:65) Aidan Southall – The Illusion of Tribe Three sets of problems ”no unidimensional classification of 1) Problems of definition socio-cultural groups can provide an adequate basis for the comparative 2) Problems of illusion study of specific problems” 3) The problem of transition and […] transformation ”All attemps at establishing unequivocal, all-purpose, unidimensional classifications of socio- cultural groups involve grave danger of Why this obsession with function? And why misrepresenting the nature of societies defining stateless societies as ”tribes”? as anthropology knows them” The colonial invention of ”tribes”? • Southall in Grinker et al. 2010:91) Jean-Loup Amselle 1998. Mestizo Logics: Anthropology of Identity in Africa and Elsewhere. Leroy Vail – Ethnicity in Southern African History Creation of ethnicity – ideological statement of popular appeal in the context of social, Ethnicity economic and political change in Southern Africa • African political leaders denounce it… • Leftist commentators label it ”false 1) A group of intellectuals consciousness”… 2) African intermediaries • Apologists for apartheid: encourage it… 3) Need for traditional values • Development theorists deplore it… • Journalists deploy it… The role of the Christian missionaries… • Political scientists probe it… ”intellectuals carefully crafted their ethnic ideologies in order to define the ”If one disapproves of the phenomenon, cultural chacracteristics of members of ’it’ is ’tribalism’; if one is less various cultural groups” (Vail in Grinker judgmental ’it’ is ’ethnicity’” (Vail in Grinker et al. 2010:95) et al. 2010:959 …Ethnicity in Southern African ”Men came to think of themselves as belonging to particular ethnic groups, then, not because they especially disliked their fellow workers, not because being a member of the group made them feel good, but rather because the ethnic apparatus of the rural area – the chiefs, ’traditional’ courts, the ethnic ideology – all worked to preserve the very substantial interests which these men had in their home areas. Without ethnicity – or tribalism – the migrants would have been less able to exercise the control that was necessary for them to assure the continuation of their positions in rural societies and their ultimate retirement in their home areas.” (Vail in Grinker et al. 2010:106) Case-Study: Tiefo people of Burkina Faso Hagberg, S. 2004. Ethnic Idenfitification in Voluntary Associations in Burkina Faso • Defining ethnicities • Tiefo-Dyula peoples of western Burkina Faso • All of them are Ouattara • Different traditional chieftaincies: Masa and Golotigi • The ”Noumoudara massacre” led by Samoro in 1897 • The home area association (ADTA) and its revalorisation of golotigi • Lost language… • …lost identity? Long-term research in ”Tiefo country” since 1990s • The rural municipality of Péni and the traditional village of Noumoudara – seven kms but a world of different powers! • Péni = Modernity, ethnic diversity and Muslim identity • Noumoudara = Tradition, Tiefo people and the cult to the ancestors and the Earth • Masa and Golotigi • Ritual and Politics Comparing Traditional Chieftaincies The chieftaincy of Golotigi The chieftaincy of Masa • War lord – ”skin chief” • Former king, peaceful – women-kings • Military strength and bravery • Territorial belonging, the Earth • Male connotations • The power of ritual and speech • Few rituals taboos and restrictions • Many rituals restrictions and taboos • Female connotations • Represents the ”Tiefo country” • Representing the village territory • Emblematic figure of Tiefo-ness for ADTA and AFDTA home area assoc. • No Masa anymore but ”village chiefs” • Legendary chieftaincy but not publicly • The war is over – struggle for showed-off recognition in a changing world Golotigi Badiori Ouattara Golotigi • Ritually enthroned in February 2006 • Public ceremony in April 2007 • ”Grand-son” of Tiefo Amoro • Lived in agriculture irrigation site • Past involvement in party politics • ”Uniting the Tiefo” with ADTA home ares association • Passed Away in 2019 Mayor/”Village chief” of Péni: Pascal Ouattara Masa • Son of last enthroned masa • Inherited ”village chief” function from his father • Elected village delegate during the revolution • Former president of parents’ school association • Etc.: ”Il est dans toutes les sauces” • Elected Mayor 2006-2012 Muncipal elections 2006, 2012 och 2016 – similar tensions in Tiefo communities • Ruling parties (CDP, MPP) • Opposition (ADF/RDA, NAFA) • ”Masaya” • ”Golotigiya” • Modernity, Islam & tradition • Tradition, animism & modernity • Development – ”many people”? • Customs – ”few people”? • ADTA? • ADTA? • Ethnicity? • Ethnicity? Association de Développement Tiefo Amoro (ADTA) • Civil society & Home Area Association • Competing chieftaincies • Accumulation of power and positions • ”Civil society” and Party Politics • Development as ”projet”, ”twinning” and ”change” • Chiefs and democratic elections • Local opposition and local debate Concluding remarks • The ”invention” of ethnicity and tribe? • From colonial conquest to colonial administration – how to govern the colonies, the importance of function • Traditional chieftaincy and colonial rule • The impact of Christian missionaries – schools, document language and cultural – not religious
Recommended publications
  • Social Anthropology and Two Contrasting Uses of Tribalism in Africa Author(S): Peter P
    Society for Comparative Studies in Society and History Social Anthropology and Two Contrasting Uses of Tribalism in Africa Author(s): Peter P. Ekeh Reviewed work(s): Source: Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Oct., 1990), pp. 660-700 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178957 . Accessed: 23/01/2012 10:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge University Press and Society for Comparative Studies in Society and History are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Comparative Studies in Society and History. http://www.jstor.org Social Anthropology and Two ContrastingUses of Tribalismin Africa PETER P. EKEH State University of New Yorkat Buffalo A remarkablefeature of African studies has been the sharpdiscontinuities in the characterizationof transitionsin African history and society from one era to another. Thus, for an important example, colonialism has rarely been related to the previous era of the slave trade in the analysis of any dominant socioeconomic themes in Africa. Such discontinuity is significant in one importantstrand of modem African studies: The transitionfrom the lore and scholarshipof colonial social anthropologyto postcolonial forms of African studies has been stalled into a brittle break because its central focus on the "tribe" has been under attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Haney Foundation Series : Ethnography in Today's World : Color
    Ethnography in Today’s World ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE i HANEY FOUNDATION SERIES A volume in the Haney Foundation Series, established in 1961 with the generous support of Dr. John Louis Haney ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE ii Ethnography in Today’s World Color Full Before Color Blind Roger Sanjek UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS PHILADELPHIA ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:34 PS PAGE iii Copyright ᭧ 2014 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. Published by University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112 www.upenn.edu/pennpress Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10987654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sanjek, Roger, 1944– Ethnography in today’s world : color full before color blind / Roger Sanjek.—1st ed. p. cm. — (Haney foundation series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8122-4545-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Ethnology—United States—Methodology. 2. Ethnology—Methodology. 3. Anthropology—United States—Methodology. 4. Anthropology—Methodology. I. Title. GN345.S255 2014 305.800973—dc23 2013019444 ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE iv For my teachers: Anne Schwerner, Robert Stigler, Marvin Harris, Lambros Comitas, Jaap van Velsen, George C. Bond, Allen Johnson ................. 18429$ $$FM 05-28-13 10:19:35 PS PAGE v This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface ix PART I.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmentary Versus Centralized States Among the Ancient Maya
    Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology 12-1-1996 Questions of Political and Economic Integration: Segmentary versus Centralized States Among the Ancient Maya John W. Fox Garrett W. Cook Arlen F. Chase University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Diane Z. Chase University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/anthro_fac_articles Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Repository Citation Fox, J. W., Cook, G. W., Chase, A. F., Chase, D. Z. (1996). Questions of Political and Economic Integration: Segmentary versus Centralized States Among the Ancient Maya. Current Anthropology, 37(5), 795-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/204563 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Questions of Political and Economic Integration: Segmentary Versus Centralized States among the Ancient Maya Author(s): John W. Fox, Garrett W. Cook, Arlen F. Chase and Diane Z. Chase Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 37, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Kerlin Park Chronology of Education University of Wisconsin - Madison Ph.D
    Curriculum Vita: Thomas Kerlin Park Chronology of Education University of Wisconsin - Madison Ph.D. Anthropology and History 1983 M.A. Agricultural Economics 1982 M.A. Anthropology 1977 McGill University, Montreal, Canada B.A. 1st Class Honors in Anthropology and Philosophy 1974 University of Bergen, Norway Studied Anthropology 1971-2 Thesis: Administration and the Economy: Morocco 1880 to 1980. The case of Essaouira. 592pp. Ph.D. thesis in Anthropology and History, (Directed by Aidan W. Southall and Jan Vansina) University of Wisconsin- Madison. Employment 1992-> Associate Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Associate Research Social Scientist, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology; University of Arizona. 1986-1992 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Assistant Research Social Scientist, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology; University of Arizona. Summer 1990 Faculty Associate, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University. 1990-> Member Core Consulting Faculty, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison Spring 1986 Visiting Assistant Professor, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1984 - 1985 Project Coordinator for research on land tenure in Mauritania. Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Honors, Awards, Scholarships, and Fellowships 1997 June, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change. Bloomington, IN 1993 Summer, Fulbright Exchange Scholar Cairo, Egypt. 1981-82 National Resource (HEA) Arabic U of W - Madison 1979-80 Fulbright-Hays Dissertation Morocco 1979-81 Social Science Research Council Dissertation Morocco 1978-79 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1977-78 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1976-77 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1975-76National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1974 Graduated First Class Joint Honors Anthropology & Philosophy McGill U.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings for UCP.Png
    In anthropology as much as in popular imagination, kings are fgures of fascination and intrigue, heroes or tyrants in ways presidents and prime ministers can never be. Tis collection of essays by two of the world’s most distinguished anthropologists—David Graeber and Marshall Sahlins—explores what kingship actually is, historically and anthropo- logically. As they show, kings are symbols for more than just sovereignty: indeed, the study of kingship ofers a unique window into fundamental dilemmas concerning the very nature of power, meaning, and the human condition. Refecting on issues such as temporality, alterity, and utopia—not to mention the divine, the strange, the numinous, and the bestial—Graeber and Sahlins explore the role of kings as they have existed around the world, from the BaKongo to the Aztec to the Shilluk and beyond. Richly delivered with the wit and sharp analysis characteristic of Graeber and Sahlins, this book opens up new avenues for the anthropological study of this fascinating and ubiquitous political fgure. * * * If you deem that anthropology is neither a form of pompous navel- gazing, nor an exercise in making preposterous generalizations out of sketchy personal experiences, this book is for you. With impecca- ble scholarship, conceptual imagination, and wit, David Graeber and Marshall Sahlins think anew, and within a broad comparative scope, an ancient and illustrious question: why and how can a single man come to rule over the many as the embodiment or the delegate of a god? Such a question, they show, can only be answered by shifting towards an analysis where human, non-human, and meta-human persons are treated on the same ontological level as parts of a hierarchical cosmic polity.
    [Show full text]
  • 42 WOLF Explaining Mesoamérica
    Clásicos y Contemporáneos en Antropología, CIESAS-UAM-UIA Social Anthropology (EASA), No. 2, Vol 1, 1994, págs 1 -17. EXPLAINING MESOAMERICA Eric Wolf* Anthropology is an unusual discipline - ‘impossible’, as Aidan Southall has said, ‘but necessaryi. It’s objects of study are human beings, peculiarly polymorphous as creatures both biological and cultural; behaving so you can observe them, yet also engaged in inaudible internal discussions; transforming nature through production, while simultaneously using language and making symbols. So far no one theory has done justice to this gamut of characteristics. Any one attempt at theory has inevitably privileged some aspects over others, selecting these aspects as ‘figure’ and relegating the rest to “ground”. The followers of any one of these approaches —temporarily hegemonic— always hoped that the marginalized phenomena would someday be explained by means of the dominant paradigm. Inevitably, temporary success was followed by a return of ‘the repressed’, often accompanied by claims that the hitherto back grounded material actually contained the missing key to solve all problems. These cycles of assertion and replacement have intensified as anthropologists previously confined within particular national traditions increasingly communicate trans-nationally. There is probably no one solution to this impasse in finding an all-powerful, all- embracing theory, but several more modest alternatives suggest themselves. One is to become more eclectic, to turn into a virtue what Marvin Harris has stigmatized as a vice. We might come to admit a range of theoretical perspectives and treat them as so many 'discovery procedures’. In place of one imperial master-paradigm, we could entertain the possibility of a set of micro-paradigms, each the source of a set of methods that might teach us something new and interesting about the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epistemological Status of the Concept of Ethnicity
    Thomas Hylland Eriksen: The epistemological status of the concept of ethnicity The epistemological status of the concept of ethnicity Thomas Hylland Eriksen University of Oslo, [email protected] Abstract The subject of this paper is the ambiguity of the conceptualisation of ethnicity. Can it fruitfully be regarded as a relational property of any social system, or should the concept rather be confined to a specific kind of historical society, notably those defined as mod- ern societies? In exploring this question, the author draws on selected theoretical and meta-theoretical contributions to the analysis of ethnicity, beginning with Fredrik Barth’s ‘Introduction’ to his edited volume, Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. KEYWORDS: ethnicity, theory, concepts, reflexivity, Fredrik Barth Introduction: The problem It is widely held, by social scientists as well as by lay people, that the members of hu- man groups have an “innate” propensity to distinguish between insiders and outsiders, to delineate social boundaries and to develop stereotypes about “the other” in order to sustain and justify these boundaries. If this is indeed the case, ethnicity can be conceived of as being nearly as universal a characteristic of humanity as gender and age – unlike the phenomena of nationhood and nationalism, which have been so conceptualised in the academic community as to concern the modern world only (Anderson 1999; Gellner 1983). Marx and Engels held, probably correctly, that sex, age and the insider-outsider distinction were universal criteria of differentiation. If, in contrast, ethnicity as we con- ceptualise it can be shown to be a product of a particular kind of society, it can of course not be regarded as an ahistorical and universal phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of John Hitchcock's Cultural Ecology in the Anthropology of the Himalayas
    HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 22 Number 1 Himalayan Research Bulletin No. 1 & Article 5 2 2002 The Legacy of John Hitchcock's Cultural Ecology in the Anthropology of the Himalayas Stephen L. Mikesell Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Mikesell, Stephen L.. 2002. The Legacy of John Hitchcock's Cultural Ecology in the Anthropology of the Himalayas. HIMALAYA 22(1). Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol22/iss1/5 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Legacy of John Hitchcock's Cultural Ecology in the Anthropology of the Himalayas Stephen L. Mikesell ABSTRACT John Hitchcock undertook the earliest application of Julian Steward's cultural ecological approach in the Nepal Himalaya. Based on Marx, cultural ecology introduced a sense of a necessary relationship between the material environment and the technological, social and ideological aspects of human culture which arrange themselves as a collection of forces, both creating humans and at hand for them to create. Many elements of this perspective have been grappled with in the various avenues of thought pursued by differ­ ent anthropologists. Except where anthropologists take culture as their starting-point, Marx took life and thus the needs of life, defined historically, with their imperative of engaging with the environment to create culture and its products, as his starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Kids in Vienna: a Contribution to the Anthropology of Urban Youth
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation “We’re Doing It in the Park!” Park Kids in Vienna: A Contribution to the Anthropology of Urban Youth Verfasserin Mag. Danila Mayer angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) Wien, 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 092 307 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Kultur- und Sozialanthropologie Betreuer: Univ.- Prof. Dr. Andre Gingrich 2 Acknowledgements I am grateful to all my former colleagues and the Verein Wiener Jugendzentren. My gratitude goes to Professor Ghaus Ansari who introduced me to Urban Anthropology and to studies of the Windy City, and to Andre Gingrich who supported me on long and winding roads. Thanks to all who let me share the park life, And to my other friends. The title of this study comes from the Blackbyrds’ song Rock Creek Park from the album City Life, Fantasy 1975: “We’re doing it in the park, we’re doing it after dark …”. Donald Byrd (né Donaldson Toussaint L’Ouverture Byrd II), hard bop trumpeter in the 1950s and 1960s, formed the group in Washington D.C. in 1973, from his best students at Howard University. The song has been sampled by many music and rap groups, e.g. by the Rock Steady Crew on their album 30 years to the day, Noiseland 2007. The Rock Steady Crew from the South Bronx, early break dance pioneers, are well-known from the movie Wild Style and the early rap movement, and joined Afrika Bambaata’s Zulu Nation in 1982. Breakers are Mr. Freeze, Frosty Freeze, Crazy Legs, and Prince Ken Swift. 3 Table of Contents A.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Kerlin Park
    !1 Curriculum Vita: Thomas Kerlin Park Chronology of Education University of Wisconsin - Madison Ph.D. Anthropology and History 1983 M.A. Agricultural Economics 1982 M.A. Anthropology 1977 McGill University, Montreal, Canada B.A. 1st Class Honors in Anthropology and Philosophy 1974 University of Bergen, Norway Studied Anthropology 1971-2 Thesis: Administration and the Economy: Morocco 1880 to 1980. The case of Essaouira. 592 pp. Ph.D. thesis in Anthropology and History, (Directed by Aidan W. Southall and Jan Vansina) University of Wisconsin- Madison. Employment 1992-> Associate Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Associate Research Social Scientist, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology; University of Arizona. 1986-1992 Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Assistant Research Social Scientist, Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology; University of Arizona. Summer 1990 Faculty Associate, Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University. 1990-> Member Core Consulting Faculty, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison Spring 1986 Visiting Assistant Professor, Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1984 - 1985 Project Coordinator for research on land tenure in Mauritania. Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Honors, Awards, Scholarships, and Fellowships 1997 June, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change. Bloomington, IN 1993 Summer, Fulbright Exchange Scholar Cairo, Egypt. 1981-82 National Resource (HEA) Arabic U of W - Madison 1979-80 Fulbright-Hays Dissertation Morocco 1979-81 Social Science Research Council Dissertation Morocco 1978-79 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1977-78 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1976-77 National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1975-76National Defense Foreign Language Arabic U of W - Madison 1974 Graduated First Class Joint Honors Anthropology & Philosophy McGill U.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa Edited by Susan Keech Mcintosh Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 052102269X - Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa Edited by Susan Keech McIntosh Frontmatter More information Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa Recent critiques of neo-evolutionary formulations that focus primarily on the development of powerful hierar- chies have called for a broadening of the empirical base for complex society studies. Redressing the neglect of sub- Saharan examples in comparative discussions on complex society, this book considers how case material from the subcontinent can enhance our understanding of the nature, origins, and development of complexity. The archaeological, historical, and anthropological case mat- erials are relevant to a number of recent concerns, reveal- ing how complexity has emerged and developed in a variety of ways. Contributors engage important theoreti- cal issues, including the continuing influence of deeply embedded evolutionary notions in archaeological con- cepts of complexity, the importance of alternative modes of complex organization – such as flexible hierarchies, multiple overlapping hierarchies, and horizontal differ- entiation – and the significance of different forms of power. The distinguished list of contributors includes his- torians, archaeologists, and anthropologists. susan keech mcintosh is Professor of Anthropology at Rice University, USA. She has conducted archaeolog- ical research in Mali, Senegal, and Ghana, and is co- author of two monographs on Jenné-jeno, Mali, widely recognized as the earliest urban site documented
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: the Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry
    Edinburgh Papers In South Asian Studies Number 3 (1995) ________________ _________ __________ __ _______________ ___ Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: The Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry Crispin Bates School of History & Classics University of Edinburgh For further information about the Centre and its activities, please contact the Convenor Centre for South Asian Studies, School of Social & Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD. e-mail: [email protected] web page: www.ed.ac.uk/sas/ ISBN: 1 900 795 02 7 Paper Price: £8 inc. postage and packing 3 Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: the early origins of Indian anthropometry Crispin Bates Nineteen eighty nine was the 100th anniversary of the commencement of the very first ethnographic survey of India and to celebrate this the government commissioned a new multi-volume survey of all of India's so-called tribes and castes. Despite a renewed emphasis on social and cultural indicators, often absent from the very first surveys, the work of physical anthropologists and the techniques of 'anthropometry', which indeed formed their basis, would not, it was said, necessarily be ignored. The only difference in methodology between the two surveys was to be that where the British drew a line and refused to include communities of less than 2,000 in number, the new survey would go down to the last 200; and where cranial measurements were once the key indicator of differing racial type, this time it was blood groups that more often were to be preferred as the crucial indicator of physical difference.1 Such contemporary concerns show that the concept of race has had a powerful effect on Indian scholars and academics.
    [Show full text]