1 Table of Contents Stories of the East From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Table of Contents Stories of the East From Table of Contents Stories of the East from Herodotus (by Alfred Church) Page 3: Chapter 1 King Croesus of Lydia Page 9: Chapter 2 Croesus, wishing to make war against the Persians, Consulteth the Oracles Page 17: Chapter 3: King Croesus is Defeated and the City of Sardis is Taken The Story of the Persian War from Herodotus (by Alfred Church) Page 26: Chapter 3: Of the First War Against Greece Page 33: Chapter 4: Of the Battle of Marathon Page 43: Chapter 6: How Preparation was made for the Second War against the Greeks Page 55: Chapter: 7: Of the Setting Forth of Xerxes Page 62: Chapter 8: Of the March of Xerxes Page 70: Chapter 9: How Xerxes Crossed over into Europe, and of his Army Page 78: Chapter 11: Of the Preparations of the Greeks Page 87: Chapter 12: Of the Army of Xerxes, and of the first fighting with the Greeks Page 92: Chapter 13: Of the Battle of Thermopylae Page 101: Chapter 14: Of the Battle of Thermopylae (continued) Page 109: Chapter 17: Of the Greeks at Salamis and of the City of Athens Page 118: Chapter 18: Of the Battle of Salamis Page 126: Chapter 19: Of the Flight of Xerxes Page 133: Chapter 21: Of the Battle of Plataea The Children’s Plutarch: Tales of the Greeks (by F.J. Gould) Page 149: Chapter 1: The Hardy Men of Sparta (Lycurgus) Page 156: Chapter 2: The Wise Man of Athens (Solon) 1 Page 163: Chapter 3: The Just Man (Aristides) Page 168: Chapter 4: The Savior of Athens (Themistocles) Page 175: Chapter 5: The Admiral of the Fleet (Cimon) Page 181: Chapter 6: The Man who Made Athens Beautiful (Pericles) Page 187: Chapter 7: Three Powers (Lysander and Others) Page 193: Chapter 8: The Man with Many Faces (Alcibiades) Page 199: Chapter 14: The Orator (Demosthenes) Page 206: Chapter 15: The Conqueror (Alexander) The Peloponnesian War (by Thucydides) Page 218: Book I, chapter 5: Pericles’ Speech about submitting to the Spartans (432 BC) Page 227: Book 2: The Plague itself (431 BC) Page 234: Book 2 (continued): Pericles’ Speech after the Plague (still 431 BC) 2 Stories of the East from Herodotus By Alfred Church (chapter 1 adapted by Mr. Smith) Chapter 1: King Croesus (Kree-sus) of Lydia There was once a mighty king in named Croesus. Like most kings, Croesus inherited his position from his father. He was only 35 years old when he took over the rule of a small empire called Lydia. Croesus ruled most of what we would today call Asia Minor from his capital city of Sardis (see map). Although Croesus had inherited power and wealth, he wanted even more. Many Greeks had sailed east from Greece and settled first on islands of the Aegean Sea and then on the coast of Asia Minor (called Ionia). These cities were close to the ocean and were somewhat rich 3 from their seafaring trade. Croesus decided to take over these Ionian Greeks and make them part of his empire. Croesus looked for any opportunity to pick a fight with these cities that he could. If he could find something serious to argue over, he used it gladly, but if no serious matter could be found, any little thing would do. Once he had started an argument with a city it was soon easy to find a reason to go to war. The first Ionian Greek city that he conquered was Ephesus, and in the course of a few years he had subdued all of the Greek speaking cities on the coast of Asia Minor. Once conquered, these once independent cities became part of the Lydian empire and had to pay tribute to Croesus. Not only did he increase the amount of area he ruled over, but because of tribute he gathered enormous wealth into his treasury in Sardis. Even after Croesus had conquered all of the Greek cities on Asia Minor, his ambitions were not yet fulfilled; he hungered for even more wealth and power. He made plans to build ships, sail into the Aegean Sea, and conquer all of the Greeks who lived in the islands there. But just when he had gotten ready to build the ships a wise traveler came through Sardis known for his wisdom. This man was Greek (although we are not sure of his name). This wise Greek saw that Croesus was preparing to build ships so that he could conquer more Greeks, and he determined to do his best to convince Croesus to give up the idea. When Croesus asked the wise Greek if he had any news from Greece, he said to him, “Great King, the Greeks in the islands are buying up ten thousand horses to that they can come over to Sardis and defeat you.” When Croesus heard this news he smiled inwardly, knowing that the Lydians would have an advantage in such a war. He prayed, “O gods, please let the Greek islanders attack us, the men of the plains, with horses!” The visiting Greek heard the 4 words and said to Croesus, “Great King, I see that you are praying for the islanders to come and fight you in the plains with horses. Certainly the Lydians would defeat the islanders with horses! But what do you think the islanders pray for? They are skilled in the art of seafaring warfare. Surely they would like nothing better than to see the Lydians build ships and attack them from the sea. Then they could get revenge for their Greek brothers in Ionia who you have conquered and brought into slavery. King Croesus believed the visiting Greek spoke the truth. Croesus then ceased building ships and instead made an alliance with the Greeks that lived in the islands. After several years had passed and Croesus had continued to increase in wealth, power, and honor, his capital city of Sardis became a place where many wise Greeks came to visit. The wisest and greatest of these Greek visitors was Solon, who came from Athens. Solon had helped avoid a civil war in Athens by writing new laws (a constitution) and establishing Athenian democracy. After doing so he decided to travel for 10 years. He told the Athenians that he did this so that he could see the governments in other countries, but he really did this to avoid the temptation to take power himself or to change the laws he had written (the Athenians themselves had promised not to make any changes for 10 years). When Solon came to Sardis King Croesus was happy to have a visitor famous for such wisdom—even though at this time Athens was poor and weak compared to Sardis and its empire. After Solon had stayed with Croesus for a few days, the king told his servants to take Solon on a tour of all of the royal treasures in Sardis. Hoping to impress Solon, Croesus made sure to allow Solon plenty of time to see his treasury and all of his stored riches. After giving Solon the 5 opportunity to soak it all in King Croesus brought Solon before him and said, “Man of Athens, I have heard much about your great wisdom and of your wanderings. They say you travel to many lands in the search for knowledge. Since you are so wise, I would like to ask one question of you.” Solon bid the king to proceed, and Croesus asked his question: “Of all the men you have ever seen, who do you think is the happiest?” The king asked this question with the expectation that Solon would answer that Croesus was the happiest. But Solon refused to flatter Croesus. Rather, he spoke truthfully: “O King, the happiest man that I have ever seen is Tellus the Athenian.” Croesus was baffled by the answer; he had never heard of Tellus the Athenian! “Why,” King Croesus thundered, do you think Tellus the Athenian is the happiest of men? Solon calmly answered: “Tellus saw his country grow in prosperity. Tellus wasn’t rich, but he was comfortable. He had beautiful and noble children, and each of his children brought him grandchildren. Not one of his children or grandchildren died before him. Even the end of his life was great: Tellus died a heroic death while fighting for Athens. All of Athens came out buried him where he fell and gave him great honors. Tellus was the happiest man because good fortune followed him all the way to his grave. Surprised as he was not to have been chosen the happiest man, King Croesus then asked Solon who would take second place. Solon answered quickly again: “I judge Cleobis and Biton to be second in happiness after Tellus the Athenian.” Croesus had never heard of these people either, and his curiosity showed. Solon continued to tell Kind Croesus that Cleobis and Biton were young men in the city of Argos. They had enough money to live 6 comfortably and they were so athletic that they won many awards in the various games the city put on and earned great honor among their peers. But most importantly, every year the people of Argos put on a great feast to the goddess, Hera, who was the wife of Zeus. The mother of Cleobis and Biton happened to be a priestess to the goddess Hera, and it was custom that a priestess she should be carried in a wagon into the city for the festival. She had a problem, however, in that the oxen who usually pulled the wagon were still out grazing in the fields, far from where the wagon stood.
Recommended publications
  • Greece, Prehistory and History Of
    Greece, prehistory and history of Archaic age Solon's reforms were critical for the longer-term development of Athens and indeed Greece, but in the short term they were a failure because Athens did after all succumb, for much of the second half of the 6th cent., to a tyranny, that of Pisistratus and his sons Hippias and Hipparchus. Under these rulers, Athenian naval power was built up, a vigorous foreign policy pursued, splendid buildings erected, and roads built. But the tyrants were driven out in 510 and Cleisthenes reformed the Athenian constitution in a democratic direction in 508/7. Meanwhile Achaemenid Persia had been expanding since Cyrus the Great overthrew Croesus of Lydia in 546, and the new power had begun to encroach on the freedom of the East Greeks in Ionia and even islands like Samos. The Athenians, like other mainland Greeks, were insulated from immediate danger by their distance from geographical Ionia, but they were in the racial and religious senses Ionians too, and when in 499 the Ionian Revolt broke out, itself perhaps the result of restlessness induced by awareness of Cleisthenes' democratic reforms, Athens sent help to the rebels, who, however, were defeated at Lade (494). How far this help provoked the Persian Wars, by drawing Darius I's vengeful attention to Athens, and how far they were simply an inevitable consequence of Persian dynamism, is not clear from the account of our main source Herodotus. A first expedition led by Datis and Mardonius failed at the battle of Marathon, in Attica (490); then at the battles of Thermopylae, Artemisium, Salamis (all 480), and Plataea (479) a far larger Persian invasion by Xerxes was beaten back.
    [Show full text]
  • Minting America: Coinage and the Contestation of American Identity, 1775-1800
    ABSTRACT MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 by James Patrick Ambuske “Minting America” investigates the ideological and culture links between American identity and national coinage in the wake of the American Revolution. In the Confederation period and in the Early Republic, Americans contested the creation of a national mint to produce coins. The catastrophic failure of the paper money issued by the Continental Congress during the War for Independence inspired an ideological debate in which Americans considered the broader implications of a national coinage. More than a means to conduct commerce, many citizens of the new nation saw coins as tangible representations of sovereignty and as a mechanism to convey the principles of the Revolution to future generations. They contested the physical symbolism as well as the rhetorical iconology of these early national coins. Debating the stories that coinage told helped Americans in this period shape the contours of a national identity. MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by James Patrick Ambuske Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor______________________ Andrew Cayton Reader_______________________ Carla Pestana Reader_______________________ Daniel Cobb Table of Contents Introduction: Coining Stories………………………………………....1 Chapter 1: “Ever to turn brown paper
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Remains
    This is a repository copy of Faunal remains. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/169068/ Version: Published Version Book Section: Halstead, P. orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-0637 (2020) Faunal remains. In: Wright, J.C. and Dabney, M.K., (eds.) The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill. Nemea Valley Archaeological Project (III). American School of Classical Studies at Athens , Princeton, New Jersey , pp. 1077-1158. ISBN 9780876619247 Copyright © 2020 American School of Classical Studies at Athens, originally published in The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill (Nemea Valley Archaeological Project III), by James C. Wright and Mary K. Dabney. This offprint is supplied for personal, noncommercial use only. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Copyright © 2020 American School of Classical Studies at Athens, originally published in The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill (Nemea Valley Archaeological Project III), by James C.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Edition
    ElizabethanDrama.org presents the Annotated Popular Edition of THE PICTURE A TRUE HUNGARIAN HISTORY by Philip Massinger Performed 1629 First Published 1630 Featuring complete and easy-to-read annotations. Annotations and notes © Copyright Peter Lukacs and ElizabethanDrama.org, 2019. This annotated play may be freely copied and distributed. 1 THE PICTURE A True Hungarian History By Philip Massinger Performed 1629 First Published 1630 A Tragecomedie, As it was often presented with good allowance, at the Globe, and Blacke Friers Play-houses, by the Kings Maiesties Servants. DRAMATIS PERSONAE. INTRODUCTION TO THE PLAY The Hungarian Court: The Picture, by Philip Massinger, is a highly entertaining drama-comedy which explores what happens to people who Ladislaus, king of Hungary. are unable or unwilling to control their feelings and Honoria, the queen. affections: unchecked suspicion, embarrassingly Acanthe, maid of honour. unrestrained adoration, and even immoderate lust, all will Sylvia, maid of honour. be repaid. The Picture is likely the only Elizabethan play Ferdinand, general of the army. to take place in Hungary's ancient royal capital, Alba Eubulus, an old counsellor. Regalis, modern Székesfehérvár. Ubaldo, a wild courtier. Ricardo, a wild courtier. NOTES ON THE TEXT Bohemian Characters: The text of The Picture is adopted from Gifford's edition of our play, cited at #16 below, but with some Mathias, a knight of Bohemia. of the 1630 quarto's original spellings restored. Sophia, wife to Mathias. Hilario, servant to Sophia. NOTES ON THE ANNOTATIONS Corisca, Sophia's woman. Julio Baptista, a great scholar. References in the annotations to Gifford refer to the notes supplied by editor W.
    [Show full text]
  • Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell
    STUDY GUIDE Photo of Mark L. Montgomery, Stephanie Andrea Barron, and Sandra Marquez by joe mazza/brave lux, inc Sponsored by Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell SETTING The action takes place in east-central Greece at the port of Aulis, on the Euripus Strait. The time is approximately 1200 BCE. CHARACTERS Agamemnon father of Iphigenia, husband of Clytemnestra and King of Mycenae Menelaus brother of Agamemnon Clytemnestra mother of Iphigenia, wife of Agamemnon Iphigenia daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra Achilles son of Peleus Chorus women of Chalcis who came to Aulis to see the Greek army Old Man servant of Agamemnon, was given as part of Clytemnestra’s dowry Messenger ABOUT THE PLAY Iphigenia in Aulis is the last existing work of the playwright Euripides. Written between 408 and 406 BCE, the year of Euripides’ death, the play was first produced the following year in a trilogy with The Bacchaeand Alcmaeon in Corinth by his son, Euripides the Younger, and won the first place at the Athenian City Dionysia festival. Agamemnon Costume rendering by Jacqueline Firkins. 2 SYNOPSIS At the start of the play, Agamemnon reveals to the Old Man that his army and warships are stranded in Aulis due to a lack of sailing winds. The winds have died because Agamemnon is being punished by the goddess Artemis, whom he offended. The only way to remedy this situation is for Agamemnon to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigenia, to the goddess Artemis. Agamemnon then admits that he has sent for Iphigenia to be brought to Aulis but he has changed his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Sources Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop Edited by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amélie Kuhrt
    Achaemenid History • II The Greek Sources Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop edited by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amélie Kuhrt Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Leiden 1987 ACHAEMENID HISTORY 11 THE GREEK SOURCES PROCEEDINGS OF THE GRONINGEN 1984 ACHAEMENID HISTORY WORKSHOP edited by HELEEN SANCISI-WEERDENBURG and AMELIE KUHRT NEDERLANDS INSTITUUT VOOR HET NABIJE OOSTEN LEIDEN 1987 © Copyright 1987 by Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten Witte Singe! 24 Postbus 9515 2300 RA Leiden, Nederland All rights reserved, including the right to translate or to reproduce this book or parts thereof in any form CIP-GEGEVENS KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Greek The Greek sources: proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid history workshop / ed. by Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg and Amelie Kuhrt. - Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.- (Achaemenid history; II) ISBN90-6258-402-0 SISO 922.6 UDC 935(063) NUHI 641 Trefw.: AchaemenidenjPerzische Rijk/Griekse oudheid; historiografie. ISBN 90 6258 402 0 Printed in Belgium TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations. VII-VIII Amelie Kuhrt and Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg INTRODUCTION. IX-XIII Pierre Briant INSTITUTIONS PERSES ET HISTOIRE COMPARATISTE DANS L'HIS- TORIOGRAPHIE GRECQUE. 1-10 P. Calmeyer GREEK HISTORIOGRAPHY AND ACHAEMENID RELIEFS. 11-26 R.B. Stevenson LIES AND INVENTION IN DEINON'S PERSICA . 27-35 Alan Griffiths DEMOCEDES OF CROTON: A GREEKDOCTORATDARIUS' COURT. 37-51 CL Herrenschmidt NOTES SUR LA PARENTE CHEZ LES PERSES AU DEBUT DE L'EM- PIRE ACHEMENIDE. 53-67 Amelie Kuhrt and Susan Sherwin White XERXES' DESTRUCTION OF BABYLONIAN TEMPLES. 69-78 D.M. Lewis THE KING'S DINNER (Polyaenus IV 3.32).
    [Show full text]
  • Mercenaries, Poleis, and Empires in the Fourth Century Bce
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts ALL THE KING’S GREEKS: MERCENARIES, POLEIS, AND EMPIRES IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BCE A Dissertation in History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies by Jeffrey Rop © 2013 Jeffrey Rop Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 ii The dissertation of Jeffrey Rop was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mark Munn Professor of Ancient Greek History and Greek Archaeology, Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Gary N. Knoppers Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies, Religious Studies, and Jewish Studies Garrett G. Fagan Professor of Ancient History and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies Kenneth Hirth Professor of Anthropology Carol Reardon George Winfree Professor of American History David Atwill Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies Graduate Program Director for the Department of History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Greek mercenary service in the Near East from 401- 330 BCE. Traditionally, the employment of Greek soldiers by the Persian Achaemenid Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt during this period has been understood to indicate the military weakness of these polities and the superiority of Greek hoplites over their Near Eastern counterparts. I demonstrate that the purported superiority of Greek heavy infantry has been exaggerated by Greco-Roman authors. Furthermore, close examination of Greek mercenary service reveals that the recruitment of Greek soldiers was not the purpose of Achaemenid foreign policy in Greece and the Aegean, but was instead an indication of the political subordination of prominent Greek citizens and poleis, conducted through the social institution of xenia, to Persian satraps and kings.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SANCTUARY at EPIDAUROS and CULT-BASED NETWORKING in the GREEK WORLD of the FOURTH CENTURY B.C. a Thesis Presented in Partial
    THE SANCTUARY AT EPIDAUROS AND CULT-BASED NETWORKING IN THE GREEK WORLD OF THE FOURTH CENTURY B.C. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Pamela Makara, B.A. The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Timothy Gregory Dr. Jack Ba I cer Dr. Sa u I Corne I I VITA March 13, 1931 Born - Lansing, Michigan 1952 ..... B.A. in Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 1952-1956, 1966-Present Teacher, Detroit, Michigan; Rochester, New York; Bowling Green, Ohio 1966-Present ............. University work in Education, Art History, and Ancient Greek and Roman History FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in Ancient Civi I izations: Dr. Timothy Gregory and Dr. Jack Balcer i i TABLE OF CONTENTS VITA i i LIST OF TABLES iv CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 I I. ANCIENT EPIDAUROS AND THE CULT OF ASKLEPIOS 3 I II. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI DECREES 9 IV. EPIDAURIAN THEOROI 21 v. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS 23 VI. AN ARGIVE THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 37 VII. A DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 42 VIII. SUMMARY 47 END NOTES 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY 55 APPENDICES A. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS AND TRANSLATIONS 58 B. ARGIVE THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT I ON 68 C. DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 69 D. THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT IONS PARALLELS 86 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Thearodoko i I nscr i pt ions Para I I e Is •••••••••••• 86 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Any evidence of I inkage in the ancient world is valuable because it clarifies the relationships between the various peoples of antiquity and the dealings they had with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Significance of Alliance Athologiesp in Bipolar Systems: a Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2016 Determining the Significance of Alliance athologiesP in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE Anthony Lee Meyer Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Meyer, Anthony Lee, "Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE" (2016). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1509. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DETERMINING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ALLIANCE PATHOLOGIES IN BIPOLAR SYSTEMS: A CASE OF THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR FROM 431-421 BCE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By ANTHONY LEE ISAAC MEYER Dual B.A., Russian Language & Literature, International Studies, Ohio State University, 2007 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES ___April 29, 2016_________ I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Anthony Meyer ENTITLED Determining the Significance of Alliance Pathologies in Bipolar Systems: A Case of the Peloponnesian War from 431-421 BCE BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. ____________________________ Liam Anderson, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Wonders Time:​ 30 Minutes Level:​ Beginner
    Lesson Five: Seven Wonders Time:​ 30 minutes Level:​ Beginner Intro The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World were architectural feats recorded by ancient historians, writers and scholars in the western world - the list is limited geographically to the mediterranean, the centre of ancient western civilization. The only remaining wonder in the present day is the Great Pyramid of Giza, which is also the oldest. The rest have all been destroyed by weather, war or nature. Today we’re going to learn a little bit about each one: The Great Pyramid of Giza The pyramids are, in many ways, the most famous ancient wonder of the world. Whether that’s attributed to their mystery, incredible feat of construction, or their sole survival (out of all of the ancient wonders) into the modern era, all marvel at their magnificence. The Great Pyramid of Giza was constructed around 2589-2566 B.C. during the reign of Pharaoh Khufu. It stood about 147 meters tall and its base was approximately 230 meters in length. The second pyramid was created for Khufu’s son, Pharaoh Khafre, in 2558-2532 B.C. Within the pyramid’s complex at Giza was the largest statue in the world at that time, known as the Great Sphinx (a man’s head on a lion’s body), standing 240 feet long and 66 feet tall. The last pyramid was built around 2532-2503 B.C. for Khafre’s son, Pharaoh Menkaure. It was the shortest of the three pyramids in this ancient wonder, standing at only 216 feet tall. It took over 2.3 million blocks of limestone, 100,000 men, and 20 years to construct the greatest architectural achievement in the ancient world.
    [Show full text]