DOCSLIB.ORG

Svalbard Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Svalbard Species List Svalbard Species List X= Seen in recent years Days Common Name Scientific Name X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MAMMALS* 1 NEW WORLD VOLES Rodentia - Cricetidae 2 Common Vole Microtus arvalis 3 Southern Vole Microtus levis 4 DEER Artiodactyla - Cervidae 5 Svalbard Reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus X 6 CANIDS Carnivora - Canidae 7 Arctic Fox Vulpes lagopus X 8 BEARS Carnivora - Ursidae 9 Polar Bear Ursus maritimus X 10 SEALS Carnivora - Phocidae 11 Harbor Seal (Common Seal) Phoca vitulina X 12 Ringed Seal Pusa hispida X 13 Harp Seal Pagophilus groenlandicus X 14 Bearded Seal Erignathus barbatus X 15 Hooded Seal Cystophora cristata 16 WALRUSES Carnivora - Odobenidae 17 Walrus Odobenus rosmarus X 18 DELPHINIDS Cetacea - Delphinidae 19 Killer Whale (Orca) Orcinus orca 20 White-beaked Dolphin Lagenorhynchus albirostris 21 RORQUALS Cetacea - Balaenopteridae 22 Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus X 23 Sei Whale Balaenoptera borealis 24 Northern Minke Whale Balaenoptera bonaerensis X 25 Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus X 26 Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae 27 BELUGA & NARWHAL Cetacea - Monodontidae 28 Beluga Delphinapterus leucas X 29 Narwhal Monodon monoceros 30 BEAKED WHALES Cetacea - Ziphiidae 31 Northern Bottle-nosed Whale Hyperoodon ampullatus 32 SPERM WHALES Cetacea - Physeteridae 33 Sperm Whale Physeter catodon 34 BOWHEAD & RIGHT WHALES Cetacea - Balaenidae 35 Bowhead Balaena mysticetus 36 BIRDS** 37 DUCKS, GEESE, & WATERFOWL Anseriformes - Anatidae 38 Northern Pintail Anas acuta 39 Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata 40 Green-winged Teal Anas crecca Svalbard Species List Updated: August 2017 Page 1 of 3 X= Seen in recent years Days Common Name Scientific Name X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 41 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope 42 Mallard Anas platyrhynchos 43 Graylag Goose Anser anser 44 Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus X 45 Snow Goose Anser caerulescens 46 Tufted Duck Aythya fuligula 47 Brant (Brent Goose) Branta bernicla 48 Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis X 49 Barrow's Goldeneye Bucephala islandica 50 Long-tailed Duck (Oldsquaw) Clangula hyemalis X 51 Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus X 52 Common Scoter (Black Scoter) Melanitta nigra 53 Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator 54 Steller's Eider Polysticta stelleri 55 Common Eider Somateria mollissima X 56 King Eider Somateria spectabilis X 57 PHEASANTS, GROUSE, & ALLIES Galliformes - Phasianidae 58 Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus muta X 59 LOONS Gaviiformes - Gaviidae 60 Red-throated Loon (Red-throated Diver) Gavia stellata X 61 Arctic Loon (Black-throated Diver) Gavia arctica 62 Common Loon (Great Northern Diver) Gavia immer 63 SHEARWATERS & PETRELS Procellariiformes - Procellariidae 64 Northern Fulmar Fulmarus glacialis X 65 BOOBIES & GANNETS Suliformes - Sulidae 66 Northern Gannet Morus bassanus 67 OYSTERCATCHERS Charadriiformes - Haematopodidae 68 Eurasian Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus 69 PLOVERS & LAPWINGS Charadriiformes - Charadriidae 70 European (Eurasian) Golden-Plover Pluvialis apricaria 71 Northern Lapwing Vanellus vanellus 72 Common Ringed Plover Charadrius hiaticula 73 SANDPIPERS & ALLIES Charadriiformes - Scolopacidae 74 Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres 75 Sanderling Calidris alba 76 Red Knot Calidris canutus 77 Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima X 78 Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago 79 Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus 80 Red Phalarope (Grey Phalarope) Phalaropus fulicarius 81 Red-necked Phalarope Phalaropus lobatus 82 SKUAS & JAEGERS Charadriiformes - Stercorariidae 83 Great Skua Stercorarius skua X 84 Pomarine Jaeger (Pomarine Skua) Stercorarius pomarinus 85 Parasitic Jaeger (Arctic Skua) Stercorarius parasiticus X 86 Long-tailed Jaeger (Skua) Stercorarius longicaudus X 87 AUKS, MURRES, & PUFFINS Charadriiformes - Alcidae 88 Dovekie (Little Auk) Alle alle X 89 Common Murre (Common Guillemot) Uria aalge 90 Thick-billed Murre (Brünnich’s Guillemot) Uria lomvia lomvia X 91 Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle X 92 Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica X Svalbard Species List Updated: August 2017 Page 2 of 3 X= Seen in recent years Days Common Name Scientific Name X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 93 Razorbill Alca torda 94 GULLS, TERNS, & SKIMMERS Charadriiformes - Laridae 95 Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla X 96 Ivory Gull Pagophila eburnea X 97 Sabine's Gull Xema sabini 98 Lesser black-backed Gull Larus fuscus 99 Ross's Gull Rhodostethia rosea 100 Mew Gull (Common Gull) Larus canus 101 Iceland Gull Larus glaucoides 102 Glaucous Gull Larus hyperboreus X 103 Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus 104 Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea X 105 FALCONS & CARACARAS Falconiformes - Falconidae 106 Gyrfalcon Falco rusticolus 107 LONGSPURS & SNOW BUNTINGS Passeriformes - Calcariidae 108 Snow Bunting Plectrophenax nivalis X 109 SWALLOWS Passeriformes - Hirundinidae 110 Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica 111 THRUSHES & ALLIES Passeriformes - Turdidae 112 Eurasian Blackbird Turdus merula 113 Fieldfare Turdus pilaris 114 Redwing Turdus iliacus 115 WAGTAILS & PIPITS Passeriformes - Motacillidae 116 White Wagtail Motacilla alba *Mammal taxonomy is by Wilson & Reeder's Mammal Species of the World **Bird taxonomy is by eBird 2015 Svalbard Species List Updated: August 2017 Page 3 of 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diet and Habitat Use of Scoters Melanitta in the Western Palearctic - a Brief Overview
    163 Diet and habitat use of scoters Melanitta in the Western Palearctic - a brief overview A. D. Fox Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, National Environmental Research Institute, Kalø, Grenåvej 12, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark. E-mail: tfo@dmu. dk If patterns of scoter distribution and abundance are to be understood, there is a need to know upon which prey items these birds feed, how they obtain these prey items and the habitats from which these food items are most easily harvested. Dietary studies and descriptions of habitats exploited by Common and Velvet Scoter in the non-breeding season are reviewed. The existing literature strongly suggests that, outside of the breeding season, these species forage mainly upon marine bivalve mol­ luscs (especially those less than 4cm long) that live on the surface or within the upper 3cm of clean, coarse, sandy substrates in waters less than 20m deep. Although there is a large energetic cost to diving, han­ dling and crushing such prey prior to digestion, such sedentary prey items often occur in very high densities, offering a locally abundant and predictable feeding resource. Since single species often dominate the diet, but dominant food items differ between feeding areas, it seem s likely that scoters simply take whatever prey is locally available in suffi­ cient abundance to fulfil nutritional needs. Large differences in docu­ mented prey size frequency distributions suggest that scoters may not select for specific prey size classes below an upper digestive limit. However, in the absence of any precise understanding of how scoters obtain their prey, nor any simultaneous studies of available benthic food abundance and size class distributions in scoter diets, it is not possible to confirm if differences simply reflect differences in profitability between different prey at different sites at different times of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard Reindeer As an Indicator of Ecosystem Changes in the Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystem
    Postprint of: Pacyna A., Koziorowska, K., Chmiel, S., Mazerski J., Polkowska Ż.: Svalbard reindeer as an indicator of ecosystem changes in the Arctic terrestrial ecosystem. CHEMOSPHERE. Vol. 203 (2018), pp. 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.158 1 Svalbard reindeer as an indicator of ecosystem changes in the Arctic terrestrial 2 ecosystem 3 Aneta Dorota Pacyna1, Katarzyna Koziorowska2, Stanisław Chmiel3, Jan 4 Mazerski4, Żaneta Polkowska1* 5 6 1Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, 11/12 Narutowicza 7 st, Gdansk 80-233, Poland 8 2Institute of Oceanology Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Powstańców Warszawy 55, Sopot, Poland 9 3Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Maria Curie-Skłodowska 10 University, Kraśnicka Ave. 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland 11 4Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and 12 Biochemistry, 11/12 Narutowicza st, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland 13 *corresponding author [email protected] 14 15 Abstract 16 Over the years, noticeable effort has been directed towards contaminant determination in 17 multiple biotic samples collected from the inhabitants of the Arctic. Little consideration has 18 been given to polar herbivores, however, especially those from the European parts of the 19 Arctic. To provide a broader perspective, we aimed to decipher trace element concentration 20 in hairs of the key species in the Arctic, namely the Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus 21 platyrhynchus), and to recognise whether diet variations could correspond with forward 22 exposure. The effect of habitat and diet was investigated using the ratios of stable isotopes of 1 23 carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N), and previous literature studies on vegetation from the areas 24 of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Status of the Genus Sotalia: Species Level Ranking for “Tucuxi” (Sotalia Fluviatilis) and “Costero” (Sotalia Guianensis) Dolphins
    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, **(*): ***–*** (*** 2007) C 2007 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00110.x TAXONOMIC STATUS OF THE GENUS SOTALIA: SPECIES LEVEL RANKING FOR “TUCUXI” (SOTALIA FLUVIATILIS) AND “COSTERO” (SOTALIA GUIANENSIS) DOLPHINS S. CABALLERO Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand and Fundacion´ Omacha, Diagonal 86A #30–38, Bogota,´ Colombia F. TRUJILLO Fundacion´ Omacha, Diagonal 86A #30–38, Bogota,´ Colombia J. A. VIANNA Sala L3–244, Departamento de Biologia Geral, ICB, Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627 C. P. 486, 31270–010 Belo Horizonte, Brazil and Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ecologia y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Andres Bello Republica 252, Santigo, Chile H. BARRIOS-GARRIDO Laboratorio de Sistematica´ de Invertebrados Acuaticos´ (LASIA), Postgrado en Ciencias Biologicas,´ Facultad Experimental de Ciencias,Universidad del Zulia, Avenida Universidad con prolongacion´ Avenida 5 de Julio, Sector Grano de Oro, Maracaibo, Venezuela M. G. MONTIEL Laboratorio de Ecologıa´ y Genetica´ de Poblaciones, Centro de Ecologıa,´ Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientıficas´ (IVIC), San Antonio de los Altos, Carretera Panamericana km 11, Altos de Pipe, Estado Miranda, Venezuela S. BELTRAN´ -PEDREROS Laboratorio de Zoologia,´ Colec¸ao˜ Zoologica´ Paulo Burheim, Centro Universitario´ Luterano de Manaus, Manaus, Brazil 1 2 MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, VOL. **, NO. **, 2007 M. MARMONTEL Sociedade Civil Mamiraua,´ Rua Augusto Correa No.1 Campus do Guama,´ Setor Professional, Guama,´ C. P. 8600, 66075–110 Belem,´ Brazil M. C. SANTOS Projeto Atlantis/Instituto de Biologia da Conservac¸ao,˜ Laboratorio´ de Biologia da Conservac¸ao˜ de Cetaceos,´ Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Campus Rio Claro, Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil M.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometrics of the Dolphin Genus Lagenorhynchus: Deciphering A
    Morphometrics of the dolphin genus Lagenorhynchus: deciphering a contested phylogeny Allison Galezo1,2 and Nicole Vollmer1,3 1 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History 2 Department of Biology, Georgetown University 3 NOAA National Systematics Laboratory Background Results & Analysis Discussion • Our morphological data support the hypothesis that Figure 1. Phenogram from cluster analysis of dolphin skull Figure 2. Species symbols key with sample sizes. measurements. Calculated using Euclidian distances and the genus Lagenorhynchus is not monophyletic, evident Height l La. acutus (24) p C. commersonii (5) a b c Ward’s method. from the separation in the phenogram of La. albirostris Height p C. eutropia (2) Recent phylogenetic studies1-7 have indicated that the Distance l La. albirostris (10) and La. acutus from the other Lagenorhynchus species, 0 2 4 6 8 p genus Lagenorhynchus, currently containing the species 0 2 4 6 8 l La. australis (7) C. heavisidii (1) u Li. borealis (11) and the mix of genera in the lowermost clade (Figure 1). L. obliquidensa, L. acutusb , L. albirostrisc, L. obscurusd , L. l La. obliquidens (28) p C. hectori (2) n Unknown (1) • Our results show that La. obscurus and La. obliquidens e f cruciger , and L. australis , is not monophyletic. These C. commersonii l La. obscurus (15) are very similar morphologically, which supports the C. commersonii species were originally grouped together because of C.C. cocommemmersoniirsonii C. commeC. hersoniictori hypothesis that they are closely related: they have C. commeC. hersoniictori similarities in external morphology and coloration, but C. commeC. hersoniictori Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns in Marine Mammal Distributions
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. TAXONOMIC DECISIONS In this work we followed Wilson and Reeder (2005) and Reeves, Stewart, and Clapham’s (2002) taxonomy. In the last 20 years several new species have been described such as Mesoplodon perrini (Dalebout 2002), Orcaella heinsohni (Beasley 2005), and the recognition of several species have been proposed for orcas (Perrin 1982, Pitman et al. 2007), Bryde's whales (Kanda et al. 2007), Blue whales (Garrigue et al. 2003, Ichihara 1996), Tucuxi dolphin (Cunha et al. 2005, Caballero et al. 2008), and other marine mammals. Since we used the conservation status of all species following IUCN (2011), this work is based on species recognized by this IUCN to keep a standardized baseline. II. SPECIES LIST List of the species included in this paper, indicating their conservation status according to IUCN (2010.4) and its range area. Order Family Species IUCN 2010 Freshwater Range area km2 Enhydra lutris EN A2abe 1,084,750,000,000 Mustelidae Lontra felina EN A3cd 996,197,000,000 Odobenidae Odobenus rosmarus DD 5,367,060,000,000 Arctocephalus australis LC 1,674,290,000,000 Arctocephalus forsteri LC 1,823,240,000,000 Arctocephalus galapagoensis EN A2a 167,512,000,000 Arctocephalus gazella LC 39,155,300,000,000 Arctocephalus philippii NT 163,932,000,000 Arctocephalus pusillus LC 1,705,430,000,000 Arctocephalus townsendi NT 1,045,950,000,000 Carnivora Otariidae Arctocephalus tropicalis LC 39,249,100,000,000 Callorhinus ursinus VU A2b 12,935,900,000,000 Eumetopias jubatus EN A2a 3,051,310,000,000 Neophoca cinerea
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT-FINNED PILOT WHALE (Globicephala Macrorhynchus): Western North Atlantic Stock
    February 2019 SHORT-FINNED PILOT WHALE (Globicephala macrorhynchus): Western North Atlantic Stock STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE There are two species of pilot whales in the western North Atlantic - the long-finned pilot whale, Globicephala melas melas, and the short-finned pilot whale, G. macrorhynchus. These species are difficult to differentiate at sea and cannot be reliably visually identified during either abundance surveys or observations of fishery mortality without high-quality photographs (Rone and Pace 2012); therefore, the ability to separately assess the two species in U.S. Atlantic waters is complex and requires additional information on seasonal spatial distribution. Pilot whales (Globicephala sp.) in the western North Atlantic occur primarily along the continental shelf break from Florida to the Nova Scotia Shelf (Mullin and Fulling 2003). Long-finned and short- finned pilot whales overlap spatially along the mid-Atlantic shelf break between Delaware and the southern flank of Georges Bank (Payne and Heinemann 1993; Rone and Pace 2012). Long-finned pilot whales have occasionally been observed stranded as far south as South Carolina, and short- finned pilot whales have occasionally been observed stranded as far north as Massachusetts (Pugliares et al. 2016). The exact latitudinal ranges of the two species remain uncertain. However, south of Cape Hatteras most pilot whale sightings are expected to be short- Figure 1. Distribution of long-finned (open symbols), short-finned finned pilot whales, while north of (black symbols), and possibly mixed (gray symbols; could be ~42°N most pilot whale sightings are either species) pilot whale sightings from NEFSC and SEFSC expected to be long-finned pilot whales shipboard and aerial surveys during the summers of 1998, 1999, (Figure 1; Garrison and Rosel 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Waterfowl in Iowa, Overview
    STATE OF IOWA 1977 WATERFOWL IN IOWA By JACK W MUSGROVE Director DIVISION OF MUSEUM AND ARCHIVES STATE HISTORICAL DEPARTMENT and MARY R MUSGROVE Illustrated by MAYNARD F REECE Printed for STATE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DES MOINES, IOWA Copyright 1943 Copyright 1947 Copyright 1953 Copyright 1961 Copyright 1977 Published by the STATE OF IOWA Des Moines Fifth Edition FOREWORD Since the origin of man the migratory flight of waterfowl has fired his imagination. Undoubtedly the hungry caveman, as he watched wave after wave of ducks and geese pass overhead, felt a thrill, and his dull brain questioned, “Whither and why?” The same age - old attraction each spring and fall turns thousands of faces skyward when flocks of Canada geese fly over. In historic times Iowa was the nesting ground of countless flocks of ducks, geese, and swans. Much of the marshland that was their home has been tiled and has disappeared under the corn planter. However, this state is still the summer home of many species, and restoration of various areas is annually increasing the number. Iowa is more important as a cafeteria for the ducks on their semiannual flights than as a nesting ground, and multitudes of them stop in this state to feed and grow fat on waste grain. The interest in waterfowl may be observed each spring during the blue and snow goose flight along the Missouri River, where thousands of spectators gather to watch the flight. There are many bird study clubs in the state with large memberships, as well as hundreds of unaffiliated ornithologists who spend much of their leisure time observing birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverine and Marine Ecotypes of Sotalia Dolphins Are Different Species
    Marine Biology (2005) 148: 449–457 DOI 10.1007/s00227-005-0078-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE H.A. Cunha Æ V.M.F. da Silva Æ J. Lailson-Brito Jr M.C.O. Santos Æ P.A.C. Flores Æ A.R. Martin A.F. Azevedo Æ A.B.L. Fragoso Æ R.C. Zanelatto A.M. Sole´-Cava Riverine and marine ecotypes of Sotalia dolphins are different species Received: 24 December 2004 / Accepted: 14 June 2005 / Published online: 6 September 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract The current taxonomic status of Sotalia species cific status of S. fluviatilis ecotypes and their population is uncertain. The genus once comprised five species, but structure along the Brazilian coast. Nested-clade (NCA), in the twentieth century they were grouped into two phylogenetic analyses and analysis of molecular variance (riverine Sotalia fluviatilis and marine Sotalia guianensis) of control region sequences showed that marine and that later were further lumped into a single species riverine ecotypes form very divergent monophyletic (S. fluviatilis), with marine and riverine ecotypes. This groups (2.5% sequence divergence; 75% of total molec- uncertainty hampers the assessment of potential impacts ular variance found between them), which have been on populations and the design of effective conservation evolving independently since an old allopatric fragmen- measures. We used mitochondrial DNA control region tation event. This result is also corroborated by cyto- and cytochrome b sequence data to investigate the spe- chrome b sequence data, for which marine and riverine specimens are fixed for haplotypes that differ by 28 (out Communicated by J. P.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Melanitta nigra (wintering) English name: Scientific name: Common scoter Melanitta nigra (wintering population) Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Aves Linnaeus, 1758 Order: Anseriformes Family: Anatidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: – Generation length: 7 years Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 codes): codes): Breeding: Competition and predation (K03.04) Breeding: Competition and predation (K03.04) Wintering: Oil spills (H03.01), Bycatch Wintering: Oil spills (H03.01), Bycatch (F03.02.05), (F03.02.05), Hunting (F03.01), Hunting (F03.01), Extra-regional threats (overfishing of bivalves in Extra-regional threats (overfishing of bivalves in North Sea, XO), Mining and quarrying (C01.01), North Sea, XO), Mining and quarrying (C01.01), Construction (C03.03, D03.03), Water traffic Construction (C03.03, D03.03), Water traffic (D03.02) (D03.02) IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List EN A2b Category: Endangered Global / European IUCN Red List Category EU Birds Directive: LC / LC Annex II B (DK, DE, EE, FR, IE, LV, FI, SE, UK), Annex III B Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Hunting not allowed in all EU Member States (Annex II B). Denmark: – (on the 1997 Danish Amber List as a species of national responsibility outside the breeding season), Estonia: NA, Finland: LC (listed as “Threatened Species” in the Nature Conservation Decree Annex 4), Germany: “particularly protected” under Federal Species Protection Decree (Bundesartenschutzverordnung)/–, Latvia: –, Lithuania: –, Poland: –, Russia: –, Sweden: LC (breeding) Range description and general trends The common scoter breeds from Iceland and the UK / Ireland through northern Eurasia to East Siberia. The species was recently split from Melanitta americana, which breeds further eastward and in North America (Bauer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Fine-Scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-069 Determining Fine-scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs OCS Study BOEM 2017-069 Determining Fine-scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry Authors Caleb S. Spiegel, USFWS Division of Migratory Birds (Project Manager, Editor) Alicia M. Berlin, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Andrew T. Gilbert, Biodiversity Research Institute Carrie O. Gray, Biodiversity Research Institute William A. Montevecchi, Memorial University of Newfoundland Iain J. Stenhouse, Biodiversity Research Institute Scott L. Ford, Avian Specialty Veterinary Services Glenn H. Olsen, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Jonathan L. Fiely, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Lucas Savoy, Biodiversity Research Institute M. Wing Goodale, Biodiversity Research Institute Chantelle M. Burke, Memorial University of Newfoundland Prepared under BOEM Intra-agency Agreement #M12PG00005 by U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Birds 300 Westgate Center Dr. Hadley, MA 01035 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs 2017-069 DISCLAIMER This study was funded by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, through Intra-agency Agreement Number M12PG00005 with the US Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Birds, Hadley, MA. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciconiiformes, Charadriiformes, Coraciiformes, and Passeriformes.]
    Die Vogelwarte 39, 1997: 131-140 Clues to the Migratory Routes of the Eastern Fly way of the Western Palearctics - Ringing Recoveries at Eilat, Israel [I - Ciconiiformes, Charadriiformes, Coraciiformes, and Passeriformes.] By Reuven Yosef Abstract: R euven , Y. (1997): Clues to the Migratory Routes of the Eastern Fly way of the Western Palearctics - Ringing Recoveries at Eilat, Israel [I - Ciconiiformes, Charadriiformes, Coraciiformes, and Passeriformes.] Vogelwarte 39: 131-140. Eilat, located in front of (in autumn) or behind (in spring) the Sinai and Sahara desert crossings, is central to the biannual migration of Eurasian birds. A total of 113 birds of 21 species ringed in Europe were recovered either at Eilat (44 birds of 12 species) or were ringed in Eilat and recovered outside Israel (69 birds of 16 spe­ cies). The most common species recovered are Lesser Whitethroat {Sylvia curruca), White Stork (Ciconia cico- nia), Chiffchaff (Phylloscopus collybita), Swallow {Hirundo rustica) Blackcap (S. atricapilla), Pied Wagtail {Motacilla alba) and Sand Martin {Riparia riparia). The importance of Eilat as a central point on the migratory route is substantiated by the fact that although the number of ringing stations in eastern Europe and Africa are limited, and non-existent in Asia, several tens of birds have been recovered in the past four decades. This also stresses the importance of taking a continental perspective to future conservation efforts. Key words: ringing, recoveries, Eilat, Eurasia, Africa. Address: International Bird Center, P. O. Box 774, Eilat 88106, Israel. 1. Introduction Israel is the only land brigde between three continents and a junction for birds migrating south be­ tween Europe and Asia to Africa in autumn and north to their breeding grounds in spring (Yom-Tov 1988).
    [Show full text]