IN MEXICO Democratic INSURGENTES SUR 1605, PISO 24, TORRE MURAL, COLONIA SAN JOSE INSURGENTES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IN MEXICO Democratic INSURGENTES SUR 1605, PISO 24, TORRE MURAL, COLONIA SAN JOSE INSURGENTES 37293 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized GOVERNANCE IN MEXICO Democratic INSURGENTES SUR 1605, PISO 24, TORRE MURAL, COLONIA SAN JOSE INSURGENTES. Public Disclosure Authorized MEXICO, DISTRITO FEDERAL. 03900 DEMOCRATIC www.bancomundial.org.mx Governance Beyond State Capture in Mexico: and Social Polarization PPortada_Gobernabilidad_INGLES.in1ortada_Gobernabilidad_INGLES.in1 1 22/17/07/17/07 22:38:45:38:45 PPMM Institutions andGovernance BEYOND STATE CAPTURE in Mexico AND SOCIAL POLARIZATION PPortadilla.inddortadilla.indd 2 22/1/07/1/07 33:20:26:20:26 AAMM Democratic Governance in Mexico: Beyond State Capture and Social Polarization Copyright © 2007 by The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. Internet: www.worldbank.org.mx All Rights Reserved Printing and Manufactured in Mexico / 2007 First Printing: March, 2007 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and normally will promptly grant permission to reproduce portions of the work. For permission to reprint individual articles or chapters, please fax a request with complete information to Gabriela Aguilar, Communications Officer – The World Bank Colombia and Mexico, fax number (55) 5480‐4222. All other queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Communications Officer, The World Bank Mexico at the above fax. The World Bank ‐ Mexico Editorial Coordination: Odracir Barquera; Cover Design: Alejandro Espinosa. World Bank Democratic Governance in Mexico: Beyond State Capture and Social Polarization. – Mexico : The World Bank, 2007. 109 p. : il. – (Report No. 37293‐MX) 1. Mexico – Government ‐ Democratic. ‐‐ 2. Mexico – Government – Transition – 2006‐2012. ‐‐ 3. Mexico – Politics and government – 2006‐2012. – 4. Mexico – Economic Policy ‐ 2006‐2012. 320.972 / W67 PREFACE The Institutional and Governance Review (IGR), entitled Democratic Governance in Mexico: Beyond State Capture and Social Polarization, was coordinated by Yasuhiko Matsuda (Sr. Public Sector Management Specialist) and Roby Senderowitsch (Sr. Social Scientist and Institutional Development Specialist). Team members included Phillip Keefer (Lead Economist), Alberto Leyton (Sr. Public Sector Specialist), Ana Bellver (Public Sector Management Specialist), Guadalupe Toscano (Public Sector Management Specialist), and Odracir Barquera (Analysis and Liaison). Specific inputs were provided by Arturo Alvarado, Javier Aparicio, Sigrid Arzt, Sabino Bastidas, Marcelo Bergman, Jorge Chabat, Felipe Hevia, Ernesto Isunza, Fabrice Lehoucq, Eric Magar, Alejandro Monsiváis and Vidal Romero. This Report was produced in a highly participatory manner. A series of consultations were held with different Mexican experts and stakeholders, given their rich knowledge of political and institutional issues in Mexico. Also, workshops were carried out with the counterparts in the Office of Public Policy of the Office of the President of Mexico, which resulted in rich input to the design of the study and the production of the final document. The team greatly benefited from the comments provided by Alain de Remes from the Office of Public Policy of the Office of the President of Mexico, who also accompanied the whole process and agreed to write the rejoinder that precedes the main body of the report; and by the peer reviewers: Steven Webb (Lead Evaluation Officer at the World Bank’s Independent Evaluation Group), Stuti Khemani (Economist at the World Bank’s Development Research Group), and Luis Rubio (President of CIDAC). Participants at the review meetings provided comments, including Gabriela Aguilar, Juan Carlos Alvarez, Dan Boyce, Mauricio Cuéllar, Joost Draaisma, Teresa Genta‐Fons, Linn Hammergren, Gladys López‐Acevedo, Ernesto May, Ron Myers and Fernando Rojas. Valuable contributions were also made by the public servants, experts and analysts we consulted, especially: Sergio Aguayo, Jorge Alcocer, Manuel Arciniega, Joel Ayala, Alberto Begné, Genaro Borrego, Enrique Cabrero, Diódoro Carrasco, Alejandro Chanona, Ernesto Cordero, Luis De la Barreda, Fernando Elizondo, Emilio Gamboa, Ricardo García Cervantes, Genaro García Luna, René González de la Vega, Felipe González González, Rosario Green, Juan Pablo Guerrero, Angel Gurría, Jorge Islas, Ernesto López Portillo, José Loyola, Carlos Macías, David Maldonado, Agustín Martínez, Germán Martínez, Lorena Martínez Rodríguez, Mayolo Medina, Gustavo Merino, Jesús Mesta, Juan Molinar, Luis Miguel Pando, Dionisio Perez Jácome, Yeidckol Polevnsky, Rafael Ríos, Allison Rowland, Juan Salgado, Eduardo Sojo, Carlos Sotelo, Martha Tagle, Jorge Tello Peón, Miguel Angel Yunes, Alfonso Zárate, Emilio Zebadúa, Guillermo Zepeda, Jorge Zermeño, and state government officials who provided their support. i Special thanks to Michael Walton, Isabel Guerrero, and Luis Felipe Lopez Calva for their contributions via their paper “The Inequality Trap and its Links to Low Growth in Mexico”; and to David Rosenblatt and Rodrigo Morales for their insightful comments on this report. The World Bank’s Vice President for Latin America and the Caribbean is Pamela Cox; the Country Director for the Mexico and Colombia Unit is Isabel Guerrero; the Sector Director for Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM) in Latin America and the Caribbean is Ernesto May; the Sector Manager of Public Sector and Governance for Latin America is Fernando Rojas; and the Sector Leader for PREM in the Mexico and Colombia Unit is David Rosenblatt. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “MEXICO BEYOND STATE CAPTURE vii AND SOCIAL POLARIZATION” REJOINDER TO THE MEXICO INSTITUTIONAL AND GOVERNANCE REVIEW xv 1. INCOMPLETE TRANSITION AND THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRATIC 1 GOVERNANCE Political Transition in Mexico 6 Summary 15 2. THE POLITICAL OPENING AND PRESSURE FOR PRO‐POOR POLITICS 17 Increased Electoral Competition and Pressure for “Pro‐poor” Policies 18 Political Obstacles to Deepening Pro‐poor Policies 22 Summary 32 3. ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION, COMPETITIVENESS, AND GOVERNANCE 35 Constraints to Economic Competitiveness 35 Monopolies, Competitiveness, and Governance 37 Summary 53 4. POLITICAL OPENING, DIVIDED GOVERNMENT, AND ECONOMIC REFORMS 55 Mexico’s Reform Performance 56 Petroleum Reform: Case Study 64 Political Reforms and Policy Outcomes 66 Summary 77 5. OBSTACLES TO FULL ELECTORAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND PRIORITIES FOR 81 REFORM Overcoming Legacies of Corporatism and State‐led Capitalism 83 Overcoming Obstacles to Electoral Accountability and Strengthening the 87 Voice of the General Public Summary 99 REFERENCES 103 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Constitutional Reforms by Legislative Period, 1988 – 2006 x Table 2 Reforms to Selected Federal Laws, 1998‐2006 xi Table 1.1 Chronology of Political Opening in Mexico 3 Table 1.2 Main Social Bargains between State and Society under the PRI 9 Table 1.3 Governors’ Legislative Successes: Tamaulipas, 1981‐2001 11 Table 2.1 Government and Social Spending in Latin America 18 Table 2.2 Measures of Policy Quality 20 Table 2.3 Mexican Policy Performance compared to Other Countries with 21 Competitive Elections Table 2.4 Quality vs. Quantity in Mexican Education 22 Table 2.5 Main Problems of Mexico according to Citizens, 2001‐2006 28 Table 3.1 The Environment for Job Creation in Mexico, Compared to Other 36 Countries with Competitive Elections (2004) Table 3.2 Constraints to Competitiveness 37 Table 3.3 High Telephone Rates (US$) 40 Table 3.4 Acquisition of Large‐scale State‐owned Enterprises, Mexico 1988‐92 49 Table 4.1 Executive’s Ability to Introduce Legislative Initiatives 57 Table 4.2 Constitutional Reforms by Legislative Period, 1988 – 2006 58 Table 4.3 Constitutional Reforms by Presidential Administration, 1988‐06 60 Table 4.4 “Productivity” of the Federal Lower House, 1991 – 2006 61 Table 4.5 Reforms to Federal Laws by Administration, 1988 – 2006 62 Table 4.6 Reforms to Selected Federal Laws, 1988 – 2006 63 Table 4.7 Political Institutions, Democratic Consolidation, and Policy 74 Performance Table 4.8 Institutions, Democratic Consolidation, and the Environment for Job 75 Creation in Mexico (2004) Table 5.1 Vote Share of Major Presidential Candidate by Voters’ Region and View 96 of the Economy, 2006 (%) Table 5.2 Vote Share of Major Presidential Candidate by Voters’ Income Level, 97 2006 (%) iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Percent of Municipalities and States Governed by Parties other than the 2 PRI, 1985‐2006 Figure 2.1 Population by Institution of Affiliation, 2004 23 Figure 2.2 Citizen Confidence in Police 31 Figure 3.1 Electricity Cost USDcents/KWh 38 Figure 3.2 Investments in Telecom 39 Figure 3.3 Net worth of Local Billionaires in Relation to GDP (Mexico and other 50 countries) Figure 4.1 Structural Reform Progress,
Recommended publications
  • Contents [Edit] Africa
    Low cost carriers The following is a list of low cost carriers organized by home country. A low-cost carrier or low-cost airline (also known as a no-frills, discount or budget carrier or airline) is an airline that offers generally low fares in exchange for eliminating many traditional passenger services. See the low cost carrier article for more information. Regional airlines, which may compete with low-cost airlines on some routes are listed at the article 'List of regional airlines.' Contents [hide] y 1 Africa y 2 Americas y 3 Asia y 4 Europe y 5 Middle East y 6 Oceania y 7 Defunct low-cost carriers y 8 See also y 9 References [edit] Africa Egypt South Africa y Air Arabia Egypt y Kulula.com y 1Time Kenya y Mango y Velvet Sky y Fly540 Tunisia Nigeria y Karthago Airlines y Aero Contractors Morocco y Jet4you y Air Arabia Maroc [edit] Americas Mexico y Aviacsa y Interjet y VivaAerobus y Volaris Barbados Peru y REDjet (planned) y Peruvian Airlines Brazil United States y Azul Brazilian Airlines y AirTran Airways Domestic y Gol Airlines Routes, Caribbean Routes and y WebJet Linhas Aéreas Mexico Routes (in process of being acquired by Southwest) Canada y Allegiant Air Domestic Routes and International Charter y CanJet (chartered flights y Frontier Airlines Domestic, only) Mexico, and Central America y WestJet Domestic, United Routes [1] States and Caribbean y JetBlue Airways Domestic, Routes Caribbean, and South America Routes Colombia y Southwest Airlines Domestic Routes y Aires y Spirit Airlines Domestic, y EasyFly Caribbean, Central and
    [Show full text]
  • Una Evaluación Sobre La Desregulación Del Mercado De Aerolíneas En México
    Una evaluación sobre la desregulación del mercado de aerolíneas en México Víctor Valdés y José Carlos Ramírez* Fecha de recepción: 9 de abril de 2008; fecha de aceptación: 22 de abril de 2010. Resumen: El objetivo principal de este trabajo es evaluar el impacto de la desre- gulación en el comportamiento reciente de los principales indicadores de desem- peño de la industria de aerolíneas en México. Para tal efecto, se estiman tres modelos econométricos que buscan diferenciar el peso de las medidas desregulato- rias del de “otras variables” en la explicación del curso actual tomado por la indus- tria. Los resultados estadísticos sostienen, con algunas limitaciones, que la desre- gulación: 1) ha tenido un efecto positivo pero marginal en el crecimiento del volumen de pasajeros; 2) ha sido condición necesaria pero no suficiente para esta- blecer una estructura competitiva de precios, y 3) ha generado beneficios que no han sido acompañados por mejores condiciones de competencia en el mercado de aerolíneas. Palabras clave: metodología, desregulación, industria aérea en México. An Evaluation on the De-regulation of Mexico’s Airline Market Abastract: This paper is aimed at assessing the impact of deregulation initiatives on the recent performance of Mexico’s airline industry. By doing so, three econome- tric models are estimated with the view of differentiating the weights of deregula- tion variables from the ones of non-deregulation variables. The main statistical findings support the idea that deregulation in Mexico’s airlines: 1) has had only a marginal positive effect on the number of passengers; 2) has been no influential in establishing a definite competitive price structure in the market, and 3) has rendered insufficient benefits for improving competition conditions in the airline market.
    [Show full text]
  • Becle, S.A.B. De C.V
    [Translation for informational purposes only] ANNUAL REPORT FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ISSUERS OF SECURITIES AND TO OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN THE SECURITIES MARKET, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018. BECLE, S.A.B. DE C.V. Guillermo González Camarena No.800-4, Col. Zedec Santa Fe, C.P. 01210, Mexico City, Mexico “CUERVO” Securities Representing the Capital Stock of the Issuer Characteristics Market in which they are registered Single Series Shares of Common Stock Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. The securities of the issuer referred to above are registered in the National Securities Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores). Registration in the National Securities Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores) does not certify the soundness of the securities or the solvency of the issuer, or the accuracy or veracity of the information contained in the prospectus, and it does not validate the actions that, as applicable, have been performed in contravention of applicable law. [Translation for informational purposes only] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Overview 4 A) GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 4 B) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 C) RISK FACTORS 22 D) OTHER SECURITIES 42 E) MATERIAL CHANGES TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITIES REGISTERED IN THE NATIONAL SECURITIES REGISTRY 43 F) PUBLIC DOCUMENTS 44 2) THE COMPANY 45 A) HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY 45 B) BUSINESS DESCRIPTION 49 i) Main Activity 49 ii) Distribution Channels 61 iii) Patents, licenses, brands and other agreements 63 iv) Main customers 64 v) Applicable law
    [Show full text]
  • Descargar Libro
    Impactos económicos de la salida del mercado de Mexicana de Aviación ______________________________________________________________ Ignacio Javier Cruz Rodríguez* *Ignacio es economista por la FES Acatlán-UNAM, maestro y doctor en economía por la misma institución. Es miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores. En el campo profesional se ha desempeñado como analista y consultor en temas de competencia así como en precios de transferencia. En docencia, ha impartido diversos cursos de licenciatura en FES Acatlán-UNAM. Es autor de diversos artículos publicados en revistas especializadas. Actualmente ocupa una cátedra CONACYT jóvenes investigadores asignado al Centro de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas (CISE) de la Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (UAdeC) donde imparte el seminario para posgrado en economía del transporte. 1 Como parte de la política editorial del Centro De investigaciones Socioeconómicas (CISE), las obras publicadas por investigadores de este centro fueron sujetas al arbitraje doble ciego, garantizando así que el material es académicamente pertinente y conveniente su publicación. Esta obra se publicó gracias al apoyo del Programa de Fortalecimiento de la Calidad de Instituciones Educativas (PROFOCIE) y de la Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila. También forma parte de los materiales generados en el marco de la Red Análisis y Evaluación Políticas Económicas y Sociales (RAEPES). 2 Primera edición mayo 2017 Reservados todos los derechos conforme a la ley © Ignacio Javier Cruz Rodríguez © Centro de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas © Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila Boulevard Venustiano Carranza s/n Colonia República, C.P. 25280, Saltillo, Coahuila ISBN: 978-607-506-288-4 Impreso y hecho en México 3 ÍNDICE Prólogo 5 Introducción 7 Capítulo 1. El escenario global y nacional 13 1.1 Algunos hechos estilizados 17 1.1.1 Transporte aéreo y grandes ciudades 18 1.2 El liderazgo en el transporte de pasajeros 25 Capítulo 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Agents' Association Charges Mexicana & Aeromexico Airlines With
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository SourceMex Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 10-6-1993 Travel Agents' Association Charges Mexicana & Aeromexico Airlines With "monopolistic" Practices Carlos Navarro Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sourcemex Recommended Citation Navarro, Carlos. "Travel Agents' Association Charges Mexicana & Aeromexico Airlines With "monopolistic" Practices." (1993). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sourcemex/2975 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in SourceMex by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 057306 ISSN: 1054-8890 Travel Agents' Association Charges Mexicana & Aeromexico Airlines With "monopolistic" Practices by Carlos Navarro Category/Department: General Published: Wednesday, October 6, 1993 In late September, the Mexican Association of Travel Agencies (Asociacion Mexicana de Agencias de Viajes, AMAV) filed a complaint with the Transportation Secretariat (Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transporte, SCT) charging Mexicana and Aeromexico airlines with engaging in "monopolistic" practices. AMAV president Augusto Bojorquez accused the two airlines of putting pressure on travel agencies to give preference to Mexicana or Aeromexico when issuing tickets or selling promotional packages. Bojorquez said the two airlines threatened the travel agencies with loss of access to the Mexicana-Aeromexico reservation system if they did not comply. Bojorquez also accused Aeromexico of attempting to force travel agencies to sign new commission contracts establishing a minimum quota on sales of its tickets. He said hotels, which participate in tour packages arranged by the travel agencies, have also been instructed to offer their best rates or face loss of access to the Mexicana-Aeromexico reservation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Universitatis Szegediensis Acta Hispanica Tomus Xxiv Hungaria Szeged 2019
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SZEGEDIENSIS ACTA HISPANICA TOMUS XXIV HUNGARIA SZEGED 2019 ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SZEGEDIENSIS ACTA HISPANICA TOMUS XXIV Consejo de Redacción TIBOR BERTA, KATALIN JANCSÓ, ESZTER KATONA (Universidad de Szeged, Hungría) Consejo Asesor ILDIKÓ SZIJJ (Universidad Eötvös Loránd, Hungría) MANUEL JOSÉ DE LARA RÓDENAS (Universidad de Huelva, España) INÉS FERNÁNDEZ-ORDÓÑEZ (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España) CARMEN MARIMÓN LLORCA (Universidad de Alicante, España) JOSÉ IGNACIO PÉREZ PASCUAL (Universidade da Coruña, España) LEONOR RUIZ GURILLO (Universidad de Alicante, España) VLADIMIR KARANOVIĆ (Universidad de Belgrado, Serbia) MIRJANA SEKULIĆ (Universidad de Kragujevac, Serbia) MIRJANA POLIĆ-BOBIĆ (Universidad de Zagreb, Croacia) JESÚS RODRÍGUEZ VELASCO (Columbia University, Estados Unidos) Editora ZSUZSANNA CSIKÓS (Universidad de Szeged, Hungría) Redactora técnica ZSUZSANNA JENEY Universidad de Szeged Departamento de Estudios Hispánicos Petőfi S. sgt. 30-34, H-6722 Szeged, Hungría Tel.: 36-62-544-148 Fax: 36-62-544-148 E-mail: [email protected] www.hispanisztikaszeged.hu ISSN impreso: 1416-7263 ISSN electrónico: 2676-9719 SZEGED, 2019 ÍNDICE Prólogo ...................................................................................................................................... 5 LINGÜÍSTICA ÁGNES BAKÓ Comentários sobre o estatuto independente de alguns prefixos portugueses ............... 9 ZOLTÁN KRISTÓF GAÁL Patrones de diminutivización en el español costarricense. Observaciones sobre la alternancia alomórfica
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Aumentando la Competencia en el Sector Aéreo en México SELA, Noviembre 2014 Alejandro Castañeda Sabido Comisionado Mensajes 1. Competencia y regulación en la industria aérea mexicana. 2. Acciones llevadas a cabo por la Comisión en favor de la competencia. 3. Lecciones aprendidas y el nuevo reto regulatorio. 1. Competencia y regulación en la industria aérea mexicana. 3 Competencia y regulación en la industria aérea mexicana. Desde el año 2000, la industria mexicana de la aviación ha sufrido importantes transformaciones: 1. Separación de Mexicana y Aeroméxico • La separación (venta) ordenada por la CFC a compradores independientes obligó a ambas líneas aéreas a competir. 2. Entrada de líneas aéreas de bajo costo • Empezando en 2005, se otorgaron nuevas concesiones a proveedores aéreos de bajo costo: Interjet, Volaris, Viva Aerobus, A Volar, and Alma. Para 2008, éstas ya tenían el 30% del mercado. 3. Crisis económica de 2007-2009 • La crisis económica generó que varias aerolíneas quebraran: Mexicana, Aviacsa, Aerocalifornia, A Volar, Alma y Azteca. 4. Desde su creación, la Comisión ha trabajado por crear condiciones de competencia • Desde 1993, la CFC mediante opiniones, resoluciones, análisis de concentraciones y alianzas, ha buscado lograr condiciones equitativas en el mercado Competencia y regulación en la industria aérea mexicana. La separación de Aeroméxico y Mexicana fue un elemento crucial para desconcentrar el sector aéreo mexicano y fomentar mayor competencia … 1993 2008 ABC Taesa Aerocalifornia Vuela Aerolíneas 10% 5% (Volaris) (Interjet) Aerocalifornia Saro 12% 11% Taesa 2% 3% 0% Aeroenlaces (Viva Aerobus) 5% Aerolíneas Mexicana de Mesoamerica Aeroméxico Aviación nas (Alma) 42% 30% 3% Mexicana de Aeroméxico Aviación 26% 38% Avolar Aviacsa 2% Aviacsa 2% 9% Competencia y regulación en la industria aérea mexicana.
    [Show full text]
  • Parque Aeronáutico Nacional
    ASIENTOS OFRECIDOS DE LAS LINEAS AEREAS NACIONALES EMPRESAS 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 TRONCALES 13,173 15,462 20,019 23,805 23,807 23,759 19,705 19,212 20,853 22,694 23,530 22,717 23,889 24,946 26,107 27,100 28,224 31,000 32,889 30,187 5 ABC Aerolíneas (Interjet) 450 1,050 1,650 2,550 6 Aerocalifornia/a 340 765 850 850 850 913 1,337 1,443 1,655 1,655 1,655 2,079 2,079 2,079 2,079 2,233 3,268 3,383 2,530 2,530 8 Aeroenlaces Nacionales (Viva Aerobus) 296 740 1,036 9 Aerolíneas Mesoamericanas (Alma)/b 400 900 750 2 Aerovías de México (Aeromexico) 4,877 5,696 6,786 7,941 8,433 8,025 6,910 7,083 7,775 8,561 8,932 9,377 9,210 9,088 9,251 9,986 10,027 10,749 10,383 7,705 3 Aviacsa 200 300 432 432 668 1,492 1,384 1,558 1,645 1,775 2,573 2,693 3,653 4,373 4,373 4,373 3,338 3,174 3,054 7 Avolar/c 120 1,040 1,493 1,040 Líneas Aéreas Azteca 544 821 821 1,073 1,073 1,073 1,073 1 Mexicana de Aviación 7,956 8,801 10,001 10,492 8,894 8,103 6,699 6,384 7,620 7,714 8,262 8,688 9,363 9,305 9,583 9,435 8,913 8,831 8,960 8,960 Saro 464 564 1,284 1,260 Taesa 1,618 3,526 3,914 4,790 3,267 2,918 2,245 3,119 2,906 4 Vuela (Volaris) 840 1,986 2,562 REGIONALES 1,037 1,261 2,413 2,210 2,655 4,610 3,844 3,846 3,944 4,153 4,446 4,999 6,121 4,737 4,873 3,373 4,462 4,728 5,058 6,041 Aero Cuahonte 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 28 Aerocozumel 122 122 122 122 114 114 74 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Aeroejecutivo 1,798 1,142 1,142 1,145 1,473 1,473 1,473 1,473 Aerolíneas Internacionales 391 386 476 476 476 686
    [Show full text]
  • Erik HERNANDEZ
    DE HELICE AL JET DE LARGO ALACANCE LA COMPAÑÍA MEXICANA DE AVIACIÓN (1960 – 1990) Por: Erik de Jesús Hernández Domínguez 1 De hélice a la era del JET. La Compañía Mexicana de Aviación. (1960 – 1990) Ante la actual necesidad de formar empresas que arrojen resultados positivos para la economía, la modernización y optimización de los elementos que las mismas empleen se convierten en un factor sumamente importante, ante ello surge la inquietud de conocer como los cambios en materia de transporte siempre han cobrado relevancia dentro de los mercados, y mas aun cuando la transportación requiere ser mas rápida, con el mínimo de errores y cubriendo la mayor distancia posible. Es así como la optimización tanto del equipo como del personal ha estado presente en el desarrollo de las empresas. En aviación esta situación es una constante ya que los cambios técnicos y tecnológicos se suceden de manera vertiginosa y permite ofrecer un servicio de mayor calidad. A nivel mundial se viven situaciones de cambio a pasos gigantescos, que obligan a las compañías aéreas a buscar innovaciones que les permitan lograr las metas que la competencia entre aerolíneas impone. Es necesario conocer no sólo la repercusión que los cambios tienen dentro de la vida de las empresas, en el Estado o la sociedad, es preciso ver cuales han sido los vehículos de ese proceso de evolución, en este caso las aeronaves de la Compañía Mexicana de Aviación., las cuales han servido para que la empresa modifique su estructura a fin de optimizar sus servicios y buscar ampliar su mercado.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Information, Institutional Capacity and Inefficiency in the Mexican Air Transport Sector
    Economic Research Paper: 2010-04 ACCESS TO INFORMATION, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AND INEFFICIENCY IN THE MEXICAN AIR TRANSPORT SECTOR VÍCTOR VALDÉS1 NOVEMBER 2010 1 Professor. Anahuac University – North, Mexico City. E-mail: [email protected] Access to Information, Institutional Capacity and Inefficiency in Mexican Air Transport Sector1 Víctor Valdés2 What is not followed, is not achieved (Traditional Japanese phrase) 1. Introduction Once again, operational and financial problems of one of its flag carriers3, have revealed the fragility of the air transport industry in Mexico.4 The fact that such an airline is on the brink of bankruptcy is not an uncommon event, either in Mexico or the world, but in the case of Mexicana and its subsidiaries it has gained considerable attention from the public and the media in Mexico, due to its significant participation in the Mexican aviation market, the number of direct and indirect jobs it generated, the disarray it has caused in its future restructuring process, and the tarnished image Mexico´s business community has shown to the world. The costs we have observed since Mexicana ceased operations, and the additional risks of Aeromexico´s (Mexico´s other flag carries) unknown financial situation, show the increased fragility of Mexico´s airline industry. Mexicana and Aeromexico had a 43% share in the Mexican aviation market in 2009. Besides the fragility, it is important to analyze the public policy objectives regarding air transportation in Mexico, such as safety and efficiency that are vital to the future evolution of the industry. The objective of this paper is to explore what are the structural causes that generate the fragility of the industry and the lack of institutional capacity to reach safety and 1 We thank the collaboration of Jose Shemaria in the preparation of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviación Mexicana En Cifras 1992-2013
    AVIACIÓN MEXICANA EN CIFRAS 1992-2013 SUBSECRETARÍA DE TRANSPORTE DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE AERONÁUTICA CIVIL 1 AVIACIÓN MEXICANA EN CIFRAS, MÉXICO 1991- 2013 El transporte aéreo de pasajeros tanto de empresas nacionales como extranjeras creció entre 1991 y 2013 en 156% a un ritmo de 4.3% medio anual, para alcanzar la cifra de 61.49 millones contra 24.02 millones en el primer año. Las empresas nacionales lograron un incremento de 111.32% al pasar de 17.66 a 37.32 millones de pasajeros en ese lapso. Por otra parte, las empresas extranjeras con operaciones hacia/desde el territorio nacional crecieron el 275.63% ya que en 2013 movilizaron un total de 23.89 millones de pasajeros comparado con los 6.36 millones de 1991. El mercado de carga presenta una dinámica de crecimiento importante, con un incremento en los volúmenes manejados de 241.47%, al comparar las 180.69 mil toneladas transportadas en 1991 con las 617.01 mil toneladas registradas en 2013, en este último año las empresas nacionales participaron con el 43% y las extranjeras con el 57%, reportando volúmenes de 266.30 y 350.72 mil toneladas respectivamente. Las aerolíneas mexicanas han venido incrementando su flota aérea a una tasa media anual de crecimiento de 2.4% de 1991 a 2013, esto en respuesta a los incrementos registrados en sus niveles de operación y de atención a destinos tanto domésticos como internacionales, incorporando aeronaves de nueva tecnología. La flota en el período comprendido paso de 188 aeronaves en 1991 a 318 en 2013. Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil Subsecretaría de Transporte2 Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes C O N T E N I D O CAPÍTULO I TOTALES GENERALES 1991-2012 Página.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Mexico July 1 General Elections
    Elections in Mexico July 1 General Elections Frequently Asked Questions Latin America and the Caribbean International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW | Fifth Floor | Washington, DC 20006 | www.IFES.org June 27, 2012 Table of Contents When are elections in Mexico? ..................................................................................................................... 1 When does the electoral process begin? ...................................................................................................... 1 Who will Mexicans elect in the 2012 federal elections? .............................................................................. 1 What is Mexico’s electoral system? .............................................................................................................. 2 Who is running for president? ...................................................................................................................... 2 How is election administration structured in Mexico? ................................................................................. 3 Who will vote? .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Can Mexicans who reside abroad vote in the elections? ............................................................................. 3 When are preliminary election results released? ......................................................................................... 4 When are
    [Show full text]