DOCSLIB.ORG

The Kapp Putsch March 1920

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Kapp Putsch March 1920 In January 1919, the Communist group - The Kapp Putsch March 1920 The Spartacus League - had tried to bring down the government; in 1920 the main threat to the Weimar government came from extreme right-wing nationalists. In March 1920, the extreme nationalists tried to seize power in an event known as ‘The Kapp Putsch’. When the Weimar government had agreed to the The Treaty of Versailles in June 1919, it had agreed that German Army would be reduced to just 100,000 men. As many soldiers were forced to leave the army, they chose to joined the unpaid, volunteer Freecorps (Freikorps). This was the military force which, remember, had been created by President Ebert,the leader of the Social Democrats, to crush the Spartacus Revolt in 1919). In early 1920 the Allies began to complain about the size of this unofficial army, which had grown to over 300,000 members. The French claimed that th Freecorps was acting like an unofficial German Army Reserve and this was against the terms of the Treat. The Weimar government was ordered to disband it in March 1920. Since failure to comply with the Treaty of Versailles could result in an Allied invasion of Germany, the government began ordering Freecorps soldiers to give up their weapons. An extreme right-wing nationalist businessman, Dr Wolfgang Kapp, decided that this would be a good opportunity to attempt a natinalist ‘do or die’ revolt against the democratic government. Kapp, who had always hated democracy, wanted the Kaiser to come back and believed that Germany should rip up the Treaty of Versailles. In an attempt to make this happen, in March 1920, he led over 5,000 Freecorps members into Berlin and declared that he was the taking over as head of a new government. He claimed that his aim was to take back the land which had been taken from Germany under the Treaty of Versailles and to rebuild Germany’s military strength. Partly because it approved of the Kapp’s aims, and partly because most of the Freecorps in Berlin were ex-soldiers, the leadership of the German Army refused to take action to stop the putsch. The Weimar government found that it had no military force to defend democracy and was forced to flee Berlin. However Ebert came up with a brilliant way to defeating the Kapp Putsch; it called on Berlin workers to start a General Strike. Without the support and cop-operation of the people, Kapp’s revolt couldn’t succeed. Fortunatelt for the Weimar government, the workers heeded his call to go on strike and Berlin ground to a complete halt. The Kapp Putsch collapsed in less than 100 hours. Defeated and humiliated, Kapp and many (but not all) of his supporters fled and the government was able to safely return to Berlin. That wasn’t quite the end of the story; once the putsch (revolt) was over, neither the Army leadership, which had refused to defend the government, nor any of those who had taken part in the Putsch, were ever punished. Why? After all they were guilty of the very serious crime of treason. The government was afraid that if they attempted to punish the guilty, it might lead to another nationalist (perhaps bigger and better planned) revolt. Thus the weakness of the democratic Weimar government was horribly exposed. Between 1921 and 1923 there were nearly 400 political murders, including several leading politicians. It was clear that the democratic Weimar government was perpetually at risk from Communists on the left and extreme nationalists on the right. Answer the following questions in full sentences 1. By 1920, which group posed the biggest threat to the Weimar government? 2. Why did members of the Freecorps attempt a putsch against the Weimar government in March 1920? 3. Who was the leader of the putsch and what did he hope to achieve? 4. Explain why the army leaders refused to defend their government against Kapp and his followers, 5. How was the Kapp Putsch defeateed? 6. Why weren’t the leaders of the Army punished for refusing to act against Kapp? 7. There were over 400 political murders between 1921 and 1923. What does this suggest about Germany in the early 1920s? EXTENSION TASK - Compare the Spartacus Revolt and Kapp Putsch in terms of: a) why they happened, b) the aims of the rebels c) how they were defeated, and d) what teach event revealed about the strengths and weaknesses of the Weimar Government..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The President Courts Chancellor Armed Forces Government Ministers
    What impact did the War have on Germany? The Weimar Republic Social impact - • traditional values were changing as more and more women • 9th November 1918 the Kaiser abdicated (he gave up his worked during the war throne) • German workers were bitter and angry about restrictions • Frederich Ebert became the leader of the new placed on their earnings during the war whilst factory owners government- the Weimar Republic. He signed an made a lot of money armistice (truce) bringing the war to an end • There were huge gaps between the standards of living between • A powerful myth developed- called stab in the back. This the rich and poor. was the idea that Germany had been stabbed in the back by politicians who accepted the end of the war Political Impact • In January 1919 elections took place for the new • Germany had a revolution and became an unstable republic government • Stresses of war led to a revolution in October and November 1918 The constitution • Many ex –soldiers and ordinary people disliked the new government - they thought Germany had been betrayed by the The President Weimar politicians Article 48 Economic Impact • Germany was nearly broke by the end of the war Chancellor Armed forces Courts • Industrial production was two thirds what it had been in 1913 • National income was a third of what it was before the war • The government was left with 600,000 widows and 2 million children to support- it spent one third of all its money on pensions. Government Ministers The Weimar Republic faced lots of threats 1919-1921 Reichstag The Threat from the Left Who:- Spartacists (Communists) When:- January 1919 German people- all vote over the age of 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Key Words
    Germany Key Words Anti–Semitism Hatred of the Jews. Article 48 Part of the Weimar Constitution, giving the President special powers to rule in a crisis. Used By Chancellors to rule when they had no majority in the Reichstag – and therefore an undemocratic precedent for Hitler. Aryan Someone who Belongs to the European type race. To the Nazis this meant especially non– Jewish and they looked for the ideal characteristics of fair hair, Blue eyes... Autobahn Motorway – showpieces of the Nazi joB creation schemes Bartering Buying goods with other goods rather than money. (As happened in the inflation crisis of 1923) Bavaria Large state in the South of Germany. Hitler & Nazis’ original Base. Capital – Munich Beerhall Putsch Failed attempt to seize power By Hitler in NovemBer 1923. Hitler jailed for five years – in fact released Dec 1924 Brown Shirts The name given to the S.A. Centre Party Party representing Roman Catholics – one of the Weimar coalition parties. Dissolves itself July 1933. Chancellor Like the Prime Minister – the man who is the chief figure in the government, Coalition A government made up of a number of parties working together, Because of the election system under Weimar, all its governments were coalitions. They are widely seen as weak governments. Conscription Compulsory military service – introduced by Hitler April1935 in his drive to build up Germany’s military strength (against the terms of the Versailles Treaty) Conservatives In those who want to ‘conserve’ or resist change. In Weimar Germany it means those whose support for the RepuBlic was either weak or non–existent as they wanted a return to Germany’s more ordered past.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
    Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Amendment
    19th Amendment It was a continuous, “ seemingly endless, chain of activity. Young suffragists who helped forge the last links of that chain were not born when it began. Old suffragists who forged the first links were dead Tennessee’s Ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, August 18, 1920 when it ended. National Archives, General Records of the United States Government — Carrie Chapman Catt and Nettie Rogers Shuler Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, June 4, 1919 National Archives, General Records of the United States Government ” The ratification of the 19th Amendmentwas a landmark moment in American Upon the word that Tennessee had ratified, Alice Paul unfurled the Woman’s history that dramatically changed the electorate. It enshrined in the United States Party ratification banner with its thirty-six stars, August 18, 1920 Courtesy of the Library of Congress Constitution fuller citizenship for women and a more expansive democracy for the nation. “ The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” — 19th Amendment, August 18, 1920 NH UT CA ME ND SD CO MT NE MN KY RI MO AR OR IN TX IA WY MA NV OH PA NJ NY KS ID MI AZ IL WI NM OK WV Why is Tennessee’s ratification of the 19th amendment significant? WA TN After Congress passed and proposed a end of March 1920 only one additional state woman suffrage amendment, three-fourths was needed for ratification. On August 18, or 36 states at that time, had to ratify the 1920, after calling a special session of the 19th Amendment before it could be added state legislature, Tennessee became the to the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of German-Scandinavian Relations
    A History of German – Scandinavian Relations A History of German-Scandinavian Relations By Raimund Wolfert A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Raimund Wolfert 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Table of contents 1. The Rise and Fall of the Hanseatic League.............................................................5 2. The Thirty Years’ War............................................................................................11 3. Prussia en route to becoming a Great Power........................................................15 4. After the Napoleonic Wars.....................................................................................18 5. The German Empire..............................................................................................23 6. The Interwar Period...............................................................................................29 7. The Aftermath of War............................................................................................33 First version 12/2006 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations This essay contemplates the history of German-Scandinavian relations from the Hanseatic period through to the present day, focussing upon the Berlin- Brandenburg region and the northeastern part of Germany that lies to the south of the Baltic Sea. A geographic area whose topography has been shaped by the great Scandinavian glacier of the Vistula ice age from 20000 BC to 13 000 BC will thus be reflected upon. According to the linguistic usage of the term
    [Show full text]
  • The Kapp Putsch and the Ruhr Insurrection
    Chapter 12 - The Kapp Putsch and the Ruhr insurrection The Coup d’État and the First Instances of “Workers Government” and “Anti- Fascism” The Kapp Putsch (May 13-17, 1920) was an attempt on the part of reactionary elements in the Army to take the first steps towards building a strong right-wing government. The German Army (Reichswehr) was reestablished by the constituent assembly: by June 1919 it had 100,000 men, the maximum allowed by the postwar treaties. Including the Freikorps, however, by the beginning of 1920 the Army had 400,000 men, which provoked the protests of the victorious powers. The Freikorps arose during the period of military demobilization and State disintegration, and their only purpose was to serve as an instrument of the counterrevolution in Germany and Russia. They were paid by the State. As the situation appeared to have stabilized, the government solved part of its problem in September 1919 by prohibiting the creation of local militias, while directly transforming numerous Freikorps units into Reichswehr detachments. But it could not integrate all of them, as it wanted to provide the army with a republican “varnish”. The majority of the troops who would participate in the Kapp Putsch were from Freikorps units which had returned from Russia after having participated in the foreign intervention. They feared they would be discharged due to the terms of the Versailles Treaty. A right-wing faction, encouraged by Kapp, a senior Prussian official, established contacts with their commanders in order to carry out a political operation. Discovering that 6,000 men under the command of Lüttwitz (one of Noske’s direct subordinates in January 1919) were going to occupy Berlin on March 13, the socialist government fled to Dresden and then to Stuttgart.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate PDF of This Page
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/4377,The-Polish-Soviet-War-of-1920.html 2021-10-04, 09:59 03.08.2020 The Polish-Soviet War of 1920 Reasons The main reason for the outbreak of the Polish-Soviet war the threat to Poland’s independence by Soviet Russia, as well as the attempt to implement the idea of a permanent revolution, and the export of the communist revolution Europe-wide. The Bolsheviks began carrying out this plan immediately after seizing power in Russia in October of 1917. They undertook the first attempts in Finland already in 1918, where civil war had broken out, as well as in the Baltic nations. In 1919 an attempt was made at provoking an uprising in Berlin, in March of the same year a government coalition was formed in Hungary with the participation communists, and in June of 1919 an attempt was made at a coup in Vienna. With the aim of transferring the revolution to other European countries, in March 1919, the Bolsheviks founded Comintern – the Third International, which was formally an independent organisation, but in practise functioned according to the guidelines of the Political Office of the communist party. One of its “branches” was the Communist Polish Workers Party (later: the Communist Party of Poland), which originated even earlier – in December 1918. From the perspective of Poland’s independence, a highly significant issue in relations with the eastern neighbour, was determining the course of the eastern border. During this time Central Europe was occupied along the belt from the Baltic Sea to the Sea of Azov, by the German army, which only began retreating after entering into a ceasefire in Compiegne on 11 November 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • AFD Ep 320 Links and Notes
    AFD Ep 320 Links and Notes - 1920 Look-Back - March 1920 - US rejects Treaty of Versailles [Kelley] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Versailles#American_aims - The Treaty of Versailles had been negotiated as an end to WWI. Famously Wilson brought a number of American intellectuals to the negotiations, but did not bring any Republicans (Wilson was a Democrat) who had won a majority in Congress in 1918. The result was a treaty that closely reflected many of Wilson’s own ideas, but would not be ratified by the American Congress. The most illustrious example of this failure is the League of Nations. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations - The Covenant of the League of Nations was signed on June 28th, 1919 as part of the Treaty of Versailles. It went into effect on January 10, 1920. (Woodrow Wilson had won the Nobel Peace Prize for the idea in 1919.) - The general idea of the League of Nations was that nations could prevent war by establishing a collective security, disarming, and having an international body for dispute resolution and arbitration. The convent, in part, read: - THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES, - In order to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security - by the acceptance of obligations not to resort to war, - by the prescription of open, just and honourable relations between nations, - by the firm establishment of the understandings of international law as the actual rule of conduct among Governments, and - by the maintenance of justice and a scrupulous respect for all treaty obligations in the dealings of organised peoples with one another, - Agree to this Covenant of the League of Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Dates and People for Germany 1919-1939 1919 1945 1933
    Key Dates and People for Germany 1919-1939 1919 1933 1945 Weimar Germany Nazi Germany (Democracy) (Dictatorship) 1918 Germany requests ceasefire. World War One ends Kaiser abdicates and flees Your course finishes 1919 in 1939 but Hitler remained dictator New Weimar Government and Constitution set up until 1945 . Treaty of Versailles signed Spartacist uprising in Berlin Hitler joins DAP 1920 Kapp Putsch (Freikorps uprising) The DAP becomes the NSDAP (Nazis) 1921 Hitler now leader of Nazis—sets up SA, designs Nazi flag 1923 French Invasion and Occupation of Ruhr/German workers strike Hyperinflation Beer Hall (Munich) Putsch Stresemann introduces new currency (right at end of year) 1924 Hitler Trial and jail (Feb) Writes Mein Kampf Beginning of ‘Good Years’ for Weimar Republic Dawes Plan (longer to pay back reparations) and loans from USA Key Dates and People for Germany 1918-1945 1919 1933 1945 Weimar Germany Nazi Germany (Democracy) (Dictatorship) 1925 Locarno Pact with GB, France and Italy—Germany agrees to keep to the land borders decided at ToV Hitler sets up SS 1926 Germany allowed to join League of Nations 1928 Kellogg– Briand Pact—65 countries inc. Germany agree not to use war in foreign policy Elections—Nazis receive only 2% of vote 1929 Young Plan (reparations reduced) Stresemann dies Wall St Crash > Beginning of World Depression 1932 Elections—Nazis receive 32% of the vote 1933 Hitler appointed Chancellor (Jan) Reichstag Fire (Feb) Enabling Act (March) Trade Unions Banned Boycott of Jewish shops Political Parties Banned 1934 Night
    [Show full text]
  • The Liquidation of Denikin and Yudenich October 1919 – March 1920
    The Liquidation of Denikin and Yudenich October 1919 – March 1920 “. Победить Деникина, уничтожить его, сделать невозможным повторение подобного нашествия – таков коренной интерес и Великорусских, и Украинских рабочих и крестьян.” “. To defeat Denikin, to annihilate him, to have made impossible for a similar invasion to recur – this is the main interest of the Great Russians, and the Ukrainian workers and peasants.” 45 Map 7 The Liquidation of Denikin and Yudenich // October 1919 – March 1920 Colored lithographic print, 99 x 64 cm. Compilers: A. N. de-Lazari and N. N. Lesevitskii Artist: N. D. Kazantsev Historical Background and Thematic Design The seventh map in the series depicts the Red Army’s defeat of the White counterrevolutionary forces of Gen- erals Denikin and Yudenich in the fall and winter of 1919-20. The map’s dominant visual image is the surge of Red Army soldiers, including soldiers with rifles and bayo- nets or cavalry with lances, who pursue White opposition forces into southern Russia and Ukraine, northern Russia, the Trans-Caspian, Crimea, Caucasus, Estonia, and Galicia, where they are illustrated as either hold- ing defensive positions, in flight, wounded, or killed. Bold red spearheads depict the movements of Red Ar- my forces, while green arrows indicate the defensive movement and retreat of White forces. Red is the dominant color and identifies the territory under control of the Red Army and the Soviet govern- ment. Green identifies territory remaining under White control, whereas gray indicates the area still being contested. Defeat of White Forces Overextended, outnumbered, and without local or international support, the White forces in southern Russia fell into a general retreat approximately 240 miles short of Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Von Schleicher the Soldier and Politics in the Run-Up to National Socialism: a Case Study of Civil-Military Relations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2013-06 Kurt von Schleicher the soldier and politics in the run-up to national socialism: a case study of civil-military relations Bitter, Alexander B. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34631 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS by Alexander B. Bitter June 2013 Thesis Co-Advisors: Donald Abenheim Carolyn Halladay Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704–0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2013 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS 6.
    [Show full text]