DOCSLIB.ORG

MARRIAGES with the GODS Gods Abducting Mortals This Part of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MARRIAGES with the GODS Gods Abducting Mortals This Part of The chapter four MARRIAGES WITH THE GODS Gods Abducting Mortals This part of the book is concerned with death at a young age often being seen as a symbolic marriage to the gods of the underworld; occasionally, the conclusion of the marriage was preceded by abduction. The rst chapters included in this section deliver a brief, critical survey of modern scholar- ship. It appears that—contrary to a number of scholarly opinions—in the context of elevating the dead to the level of supernatural beings on verse- inscriptions, the meaning of wedding imagery was neither mystic (Orphic) nor eschatological (Eleusinian mysteries). My intent is to demonstrate that it was rather an embellishment and/or dramatisation (sometimes a highly sophisticated one, as was the case of the epigram for Theophile, discussed at length in the fourth chapter) of the basic idea of divine abduction, con- veying the message of the beauty of mortals prompting the gods themselves to descend and embrace them. When death occurred late in life, it was usually regarded to be in the nat- ural order of things. However, when death came early, this order appeared to be disrupted, and the ancient Greeks frequently attributed it to the inter- vention of celestial or chthonic powers.1 Epigrams frequently spoke of the deceased being abducted by deities, but other scenarios were also possi- ble. The usual causers of death included Moira or the Moirai,2 or Hades.3 It was frequently a δαίµων or δαίµονες4 as well as the personi cation of ‘envy,’ Phthonos,5 or a βάσκανος δέ τις.6 Less frequent abductors included Heimarmene and Tyche, Thanatos, Eileithyia, Ares, Persephone, Charon, Ge 1 Herkenrath 1896, 17–19 and 21; Festugière 1932, 152–160; Lattimore 1942, 146–151; Vérilhac 1978(2), 173–185; Pfohl 1983, 472–473; Le Bris 2001, 103–106; Peres 2003, 180–196. 2 Mayer 1927, 16–18. 3 Kaibel EG, no., ‘Index II’ s.v.; SGO(5), s.v. 4 Nowak 1960; Clairmont 1970, 84, n. 45; Stichel 1982, 193, n. 58; Garland 1985, 162. 5 Peek GV, no. 583; IGUR(3), no. 1275; Peek GV, no. 858; Bousquet 1981; SEG(31), nos. 289– 291; SEG(35), no. 630. See the references in Ehrhardt 1994, 48–49. 6 MAMA(3), no. 556 (prose). 98 chapter four (Earth), Hermes, Chronos,7 Hora,8 and even—in exceptional instances— Ananke.9 Therefore the perpetrators were most often deities associated with fate or the underworld as well as various lesser deities or ‘daemonic’ powers. In Archaic times the dead were usually received by Hades and Persephone in the underworld, whereas death itself was caused by more abstract powers, such as µοῖρα, κήρ and θάνατος˘ . In Hellenistic times, on the other hand, the abducting was more frequently attributed to the chthonic deities; this role was also performed by daemons, Moira and Tyche.10 In most cases responsi- bility for the abduction of the deceased to the other world, from which they did not return, was attributed to the hostile or at best indiferent Hades. He could ‘abduct’ a wedding itself,11 he could even abduct representatives of his own sex, e.g. a deceased male who was sent (πένψας) to the θαλά- µοις of Persephone,12 or Hades could even take a husband from his own wife.13 Nevertheless, the most widespread mythical paradigm for the abduction of the dead was the actual kidnapping of Persephone by Hades. Numerous depictions of this myth have survived on Greek vases from the Classical period, ones which quite frequently originate from tombs.14 By the Greco- Roman period they became almost exclusively an aspect of funerary art. They appear on over a hundred sarcophagi, funerary paintings and mosaics. They are a particularly common feature on sarcophagi (including those of men). There are also urns and funerary reliefs showing the characteristic image of an overturned basket and a bird ying out of it, images which most likely refer to the Persephone myth. The girl was picking owers on a meadow and putting them in her basket, which was next overturned when Hades abducted her. In this way the basket came to symbolise the deceased or her soul, which was abducted by the god of the underworld. There were many variations on this theme. For instance, a Hellenistic relief 7 As πανδαµάτωρ, Peek GV, no. 850; Bernand 1969, no. 16; Horbury, Noy 1992, no. 39. 8 Dunant, Pouilloux 1954–1958(2), 196–197, no. 370; Feissel 1983, no. 265. 9 Kaibel EG, no. 156; Peek GV, no. 1759; Vérilhac 1978(1), no. 195. The Fate (εἷλε µόρος) in Al Muzzeini, et al. 2003, see SEG(51), no. 2212; AE 2003, nos. 1883–1885; SEG(53.2), no. 2057; BE 2004, no. 447. 10 Díaz de Cerio 1998, 59–62, 66, n. 52. 11 MAMA(8), no. 65; SGO(3), no. 14/11/01. 12 Kaibel EG, no. 201; Peek GV, no. 1541. 13 As Πλουτεὺς, MAMA(10), no. 169; SGO(3), no. 16/31/83. 14 For the Classical λήκυθοι, see the references in Wrede 1981, 12. For the wedding imagery in funerary context, Jenkins 1983; Evans-Grubbs 1989; Reilly 1989; Foley 1994, 81–82..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Demeter and Dionysos: Connections in Literature, Cult and Iconography Kathryn Cook April 2011
    Demeter and Dionysos: Connections in Literature, Cult and Iconography Kathryn Cook April 2011 Demeter and Dionysos are two gods among the Greek pantheon who are not often paired up by modern scholars; however, evidence from a number of sources alluding to myth, cult and iconography shows that there are similarities and connections observable from our present point of view, that were commented upon by contemporary authors. This paper attempts to examine the similarities and connections between Demeter and Dionysos up through the Classical period. These two deities were not always entwined in myth. Early evidence of gods in the Linear B tablets mention Dionysos as the name of a deity, but Demeter’s name does not appear in the records until later. Over the centuries (up to approximately the 6th century as mentioned in this paper), Demeter and Dionysos seem to have been depicted together in cult and in literature more and more often. In particular, the figure of Iacchos in the Eleusinian cult seems to form a bridging element between the two which grew from being a personification of the procession for Demeter, into being a Dionysos figure who participated in her cult. Literature: Demeter and Dionysos have some interesting parallels in literature. To begin with, they are both rarely mentioned in the Homeric poems, compared to other gods like Hera or Athena. In the Iliad, neither Demeter nor Dionysos plays a role as a main character. Instead they are mentioned in passing, as an example or as an element of an epic simile.1 These two divine figures are present even less often in the Odyssey, though this is perhaps a reflection of the fewer appearances of the gods overall, they are 1 Demeter: 2.696.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab Assignment 1
    CS181: Programming Languages Vladimir Vacic, Christos Koufogiannakis University of California, Riverside Lab Assignment 1 1. Given the following graph of possible flights between seven US cities: (graph taken from the web site of the American Mathematical Society, http://www.ams.org) a) Write a Prolog program that would check if there is a route from Fresno to Dallas, from Seattle to Boston, and from Atlanta to Fresno. b) Write a C program that does the same thing. Note: you have to write complete, working programs, run them and show the results. As far as C goes, the choice of data structure to store the relations between cities is yours. Warning: if there are cycles in the graph, Prolog might never find a solution and may never say that there are no solutions. If this happens in your assignment, make a note of that. 2. Given the partial family tree of the gods of the ancient Greeks encoded as a Prolog database: parent(chaos, gaea). parent(gaea, cyclope). parent(gaea, chronos). parent(gaea, coeus). parent(gaea, oceanus). parent(uranus, cyclope). parent(uranus, chronos). parent(uranus, coeus). parent(uranus, oceanus). parent(chronos, hades). parent(chronos, poseidon). parent(chronos, zeus). parent(rhea, hades). parent(rhea, poseidon). parent(rhea, zeus). parent(coeus, leto). parent(phoebe, leto). parent(leto, apollo). parent(leto, artemis). parent(zeus, apollo). parent(zeus, artemis). parent(oceanus, iapetus). parent(tethys, iapetus). parent(hera, ares). parent(zeus, ares). male(chaos). male(cyclope). male(uranus). male(chronos). male(coeus). male(oceanus). male(hades). male(poseidon). male(zeus). male(ares). male(apollo). male(iapetus).
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought
    THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT by MELISSA M. SHEW A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2008 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation of Approval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Melissa Shew Title: "The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department ofPhilosophy by: Peter Warnek, Chairperson, Philosophy John Lysaker, Member, Philosophy Ted Toadvine, Member, Philosophy James Crosswhite, Outside Member, English and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. September 6, 2008 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 An Abstract of the Dissertation of Melissa M. Shew for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy to be taken September 2008 Title: THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT Approved: Dr. Peter Warnek This dissertation engages three facets of Greek philosophy: 1) the phenomenon of tyche (chance, fortune, happening, or luck) in Aristotle's Physics, Nicomachean Ethics, and Poetics; 2) how tyche infonns Socrates' own philosophical practice in the Platonic dialogues; and 3) how engaging tyche in these Greek texts challenges established interpretations of Greek thought in contemporary scholarship and discussion. I argue that the complex status of tyche in Aristotle's texts, when combined with its appearance in the Platonic dialogues and the framework of Greek myth and poetry (poiesis), underscores the seriousness with which the Greeks consider the role of chance in human life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shield of Heracles (Hes
    chapter 4 The Shield of Heracles (Hes. Sc. 139–320) 4.1 Introduction The next extant ekphrasis in ancient Greek Literature is found in the pseudo- Hesiodic Shield. The Shield is a small-scale epic poem of 480 hexameters, named after its central section which deals with Heracles’ shield. The poem is usually dated to the first third of the sixth century BC. It narrates an episode from the life of Heracles: the killing of Cycnus, a son of Ares. Heracles is por- trayed throughout the poem in a positive light: Zeus has fathered Heracles as a protector against ruin for gods and for men (ὥς ῥα θεοῖσιν / ἀνδράσι τ’ ἀλφηστῇσιν ἀρῆς ἀλκτῆρα φυτεύσαι, 28–29).1 By killing Cycnus, who robs travellers on their way to Delphi, Heracles lives up to this purpose. The poem is generally regarded as a product of an oral tradition.2 The fact that the Shield is oral poetry has consequences for its understanding. Thus, the idea that the Shield is a mere imitation of Achilles’ shield in Il. 18.478–608— a verdict that goes back to Aristophanes of Byzantium—must be rejected.3 It is doubtful whether in the sixth century BC fixed texts of the Iliad existed, to which another text, that of the Shield, could refer.4 This is very much a Hellenis- tic point of view. Rather, it is more plausible that both texts came into being in a still-fluid oral tradition, which contained certain stock formulae and themes.5 One common element in the tradition might well have been a shield ekphrasis, which could serve as a showpiece of the poet.6 The poet of the Shield has indeed composed his shield ekphrasis as a show- piece: Heracles’ shield is noisier, more sensational, more gruesome, but above all bigger than Achilles’ shield.
    [Show full text]
  • Who-Let-The-Gods-Out-Chapter-By-Chapter-Resources.Pdf
    WHO LET THE GODS OUT? Maz Evans CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER RESOURCES CREATED BY: Ashley Booth @MrBoothY6 www.maz.world @maryaliceevans chickenhousebooks.com Chapter Comprehension Writing Cross Curricular Questions Opportunities Opportunities 1 • What does the author mean when referring to the body odour Write a conversation ART • Draw what you think as ‘weapons grade’? between a naughty pupil Elliot, Call Me Graham and • What does ‘jubilantly’ mean? Can you do an impression of and a headteacher in the Mr Boil look like. ‘lumbering jubilantly’? style of Elliot and Mr Boil. • Is Elliot often in trouble? How do you know? Use shifts in formality to DRAMA • Use drama to act • Why do you think Mr Boil has no respect for Call Me Graham? make it effective. out the scene in Call Me • Is Elliot a good student? How do you know? Graham’s office. • Where does Elliot go to school? • How old is Elliot? 2 • What does the text mean when it says the farm had been the Write the next part of the ART • Create your own family home for ‘generations’? story, predicting where Mum horrible neighbour in the • What words show that Elliot doesn’t want to speak to Patricia has gone. style of Patricia Porshley- Porshley-Plum? Plum. • Why might Elliot like the walk home so much? • Why does Elliot lie about his mum being ill? • Why does Elliot get so panicked? • Predict where Mum has gone. • What impression do you get of Patricia in this chapter? www.maz.world @maryaliceevans CREATED BY: Ashley Booth @MrBoothY6 chickenhousebooks.com Chapter Comprehension Writing Cross Curricular Questions Opportunities Opportunities 3 • Explain what a zodiac is.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology
    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eros-Thanatos Conflict in DH Lawrence's Women in Love
    J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. , 5(8S )555 -560 , 2015 ISSN: 2090-4274 Journal of Applied Environmental © 2015, TextRoad Publication and Biological Sciences www.textroad.com The Eros-Thanatos Conflict in D.H. Lawrence’s Women in Love : A Psychoanalytic Study Rahim Noori Khaneghah Ph.D.in English Literature, Department of English, University of Maragheh, Iran. Received: March 8, 2015 Accepted: May 10, 2015 ABSTRACT The present essay is interdisciplinary in nature and touches two-subject areas: literature and psychoanalysis. In Women in Love , Ursula-Birkin relationship is regarded as representation of life drive (Eros) and Gudrun-Gerald relationship as a finest example of the victory of the death drive (Thanatos) over the life drive (Eros). The death and live drives are present in every living creature, but these two opposite drivesshould be in normal mixture. Some traumatic situations and repressed wishes cause the imbalance of this regular mixture of life and death drives and make one drive more possessive than the other drive. Eros-Thanatos struggle is an inner one and the victory of one drive over the other may cause the death of the individual. The essay makes an attempt to bring to light the struggles of the four major characters of the novel (Ursula, Birkin, Gerald and Gudrun) between Eros and Thanatos with the help of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytic perspectives. KEYWORDS: Struggle, Death drive, Life drive, Possessiveness, Regular mixture 1. INTRODUCTION Women in Love is regarded as the finest novel of D. H. Lawrence which was published in the USA in 1920. This novel is in fact the story of two Brangwen sisters, Ursula and Gudrun, and their love experience with Birkin and Gerald respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Leto As Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C
    https://publications.dainst.org iDAI.publications ELEKTRONISCHE PUBLIKATIONEN DES DEUTSCHEN ARCHÄOLOGISCHEN INSTITUTS Dies ist ein digitaler Sonderdruck des Beitrags / This is a digital offprint of the article Lavinia Foukara Leto as Mother: Representations of Leto with Apollo and Artemis in Attic Vase Painting of the Fifth Century B.C. aus / from Archäologischer Anzeiger Ausgabe / Issue Seite / Page 63–83 https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/2027/6626 • urn:nbn:de:0048-journals.aa-2017-1-p63-83-v6626.5 Verantwortliche Redaktion / Publishing editor Redaktion der Zentrale | Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Weitere Informationen unter / For further information see https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa ISSN der Online-Ausgabe / ISSN of the online edition 2510-4713 ISSN der gedruckten Ausgabe / ISSN of the printed edition Verlag / Publisher Ernst Wasmuth Verlag GmbH & Co. Tübingen ©2019 Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale, Podbielskiallee 69–71, 14195 Berlin, Tel: +49 30 187711-0 Email: [email protected] / Web: dainst.org Nutzungsbedingungen: Mit dem Herunterladen erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen (https://publications.dainst.org/terms-of-use) von iDAI.publications an. Die Nutzung der Inhalte ist ausschließlich privaten Nutzerinnen / Nutzern für den eigenen wissenschaftlichen und sonstigen privaten Gebrauch gestattet. Sämtliche Texte, Bilder und sonstige Inhalte in diesem Dokument unterliegen dem Schutz des Urheberrechts gemäß dem Urheberrechtsgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die Inhalte können von Ihnen nur dann genutzt und vervielfältigt werden, wenn Ihnen dies im Einzelfall durch den Rechteinhaber oder die Schrankenregelungen des Urheberrechts gestattet ist. Jede Art der Nutzung zu gewerblichen Zwecken ist untersagt. Zu den Möglichkeiten einer Lizensierung von Nutzungsrechten wenden Sie sich bitte direkt an die verantwortlichen Herausgeberinnen/Herausgeber der entsprechenden Publikationsorgane oder an die Online-Redaktion des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Mythology #23: DIONYSUS by Joy Journeay
    Western Regional Button Association is pleased to share our educational articles with the button collecting community. This article appeared in the August 2017 WRBA Territorial News. Enjoy! WRBA gladly offers our articles for reprint, as long as credit is given to WRBA as the source, and the author. Please join WRBA! Go to www.WRBA.us Greek Mythology #23: DIONYSUS by Joy Journeay God of: Grape Harvest, Winemaking, Wine, Ritual Madness, Religious Ecstasy, Fertility and Theatre Home: MOUNT OLYMPUS Symbols: Thyrus, grapevine, leopard skin Parents: Zeus and Semele Consorts: Adriane Siblings: Ares, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Aphrodite, Hebe, Hermes, Heracles, Helen of Troy, Hephaestus, Perseus, Minos, the Muses, the Graces Roman Counterpart: Bacchus, Liber Dionysus’ mother was mortal Semele, daughter of a king of Thebes, and his father was Zeus, king of the gods. Dionysus was the only Olympian god to have a mortal parent. He was the god of fertility, wine and the arts. His nature reflected the duality of wine: he gave joy and divine ecstasy, or brutal and blinding rage. He and his followers could not be contained by bonds. One would imagine that being the god of “good times” could be a pretty easy and happy existence. Unfortunately, this just doesn’t happen in the world of Greek mythology. Dionysus is called “twice born.” His mother, Semele, was seduced by a Greek god, but Semele did not know which god was her lover. Fully aware of her husband’s infidelity, the jealous Hera went to Semele in disguise and convinced her to see her god lover in his true form.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek God Quiz Answer Sheet
    Greek God Answer Key 1 - How would your friends describe you? A – Generous – point for Hepheastus B – Determined – point for Artemis, Hera C – Creative – point for Apollo, Demeter D – Stubborn – point for Zeus, Ares E - Go with the flow – point for Aphrodite, Poseidon F - Smarty Pants – point for Athena G - Silly – point for Dionysus, Hermes 2 - What colour are your eyes? A – Blue – point for Hermes, Poseidon B - Dark Brown – point for Dionysus, Ares C - Light Brown – point for Hepaestus, Apollo D – Hazel – point for Zeus, Artemis E – Gray – point for Athena, Aphrodite F – Green – point for Demeter, Hera 3 - What object would you most likely be found with? A - The latest gadget – point for Hermes, Hephaestus B - A video game – point for Artemis, Hera, Ares C - A musical instrument – point for Apollo, Aphrodite D - A book – point for Athena, Zeus E - A snack – point for Dionysus, Demeter F - Swimming or boating gear – point for Poseidon 4 - What’s your ideal vacation spot? A - The forest – point for Hermes, Artemis B - The beach – point for Poseidon, Aphrodite C - The mountains – point for Zeus, Hera D - An amusement park – point for Dionysus, Ares E - The big city - point for Hephaestus, Apollo F - The countryside – point for Athena, Demeter 5 - Which of these animals is your favourite? A – Eagle - point for Hermes, Zeus B – Pig – point for Demeter C – Owl – point for Hephaestus D – Peacock – point for Hera E – Deer – point for Artemis F – Dolphin – point for Poseidon G – Cow – point for Dionysus H – Horse – point for Athena, Apollo I
    [Show full text]
  • Ares and Artemis: the Autonomous Roving Exploration System for Active Source Seismology on the Moon S
    ARES AND ARTEMIS: THE AUTONOMOUS ROVING EXPLORATION SYSTEM FOR ACTIVE SOURCE SEISMOLOGY ON THE MOON S. W. Courville1, N. E. Putzig1, P. C. Sava2, T. D. Mikesell3, M. R. Perry1;2, 1Planetary Science Institute, Lakewood, CO. 2Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO. 3Boise State University, Boise, ID. ([email protected]) Introduction: NASA’s Artemis program will en- able a sustainable human presence on the Moon. A key objective of the program is to investigate water ice within regolith in the lunar south pole, which could provide fuel and life support. The origin and concentration of water ice in lunar regolith is not well understood. Determining the concentration of water ice at the surface and whether it persists with depth could help determine if the ice was delivered by comets or is endogenic [1]. We propose active seismic surveying to quantify re- golith ice content at lunar south pole landing sites. The ice content in lunar regolith is likely correlated with seis- Figure 1: The ARES concept illustrated over icy regolith mic shear wave velocity. Seismic surface wave analysis layering on the Moon. Figure 4 shows a numerical sim- of analog permafrost material on Earth has demonstrated ulation of this scenario. that shear wave velocity increases dramatically with ice vide configurability and redundancy to collect enough content [2,3]. We suggest using surface wave analy- data to survey a landing site. sis to measure ice content in near surface regolith on the Receivers: For the receiver rover, we consider the Moon. Additionally, seismic refraction analysis would small and nimble 10kg Resource Prospector rover pro- reveal subsurface layering within the near surface [4].
    [Show full text]