DOCSLIB.ORG

Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln JFSP Synthesis Reports U.S. Joint Fire Science Program 2009 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests Anne M. Bartuszevige Oregon State University Patricia L. Kennedy Oregon State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspsynthesis Part of the Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Bartuszevige, Anne M. and Kennedy, Patricia L., "Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests" (2009). JFSP Synthesis Reports. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspsynthesis/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in JFSP Synthesis Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests (SR 1095)—Oregon State University State 1095)—Oregon (SR Forests Dry U.S. in Vegetation Understory on Treatments Thinning and Fire of Effects the on Knowledge of Synthesis Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests Anne M. Bartuszevige and Patricia L. Kennedy Special Report 1095 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests Anne M. Bartuszevige Conservation Science Director Playa Lakes Joint Venture Previously: Postdoctoral Researcher Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Union, Oregon Patricia L. Kennedy Professor Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Union, Oregon Special Report 1095 September 2009 Synthesis of Knowledge on the Effects of Fire and Thinning Treatments on Understory Vegetation in U.S. Dry Forests Special Report 1095 September 2009 Extension and Experiment Station Communications Oregon State University 422 Kerr Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 http://extension.oregonstate.edu/ © 2009 by Oregon State University. This publication may be photocopied or reprinted in its entirety for noncommercial purposes. This publication was produced and distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension work is a cooperative program of Oregon State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Oregon counties. Oregon State University Extension Service offers educational programs, activities, and materials without discrimination based on age, color, disability, gender identity or expression, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran’s status. Oregon State University Extension Service is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Any mention of trade names does not constitute an endorsement. Acknowledgements This is Contribution 72 of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate (FFS) Project, funded by the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program. We thank the Program for funding this synthesis and Jim McIver for helping conceptualize the final product. Jim also provided us with all available Fire and Fire Surrogate Program information. We thank John Cissel, Tim Swedberg, Kim Verhelst, and Becky Jenison for administrative support. Joe Fontaine and Tim Swedberg gave invaluable support in organizing the scoping meeting. We also thank the meeting attendees: Jim Gallagher, Robert Means, Kenneth Outcalt, Dana Perkins, Roger Rosentreter, and Steve Sutherland. They took time out of their impossible schedules to fly to Boise on short notice and share their expertise on understory vegetation and fire and thinning management. Their input was essential to the conceptual development of this project, but they are not to blame for any shortcomings. John Bailey, Carl Fiedler, Joe Fontaine, David Hibbs, and Dana Perkins reviewed this document which resulted in substantial improvements. Finally, a big thanks to Colette Coiner who assisted with all aspects of this document. Cover photos: Top: A feller at the Blue Mountain Fire and Fire Surrogate site in northeastern Oregon. (Elizabeth Dodson Coulter) Bottom: A squad leader uses a drip torch to clean up a fire line on the Bear Prescribed Fire in Washington. (Cason McCain, USDA Forest Service, fs.fed.us) Contents SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................7 Importance of understory herbaceous plant communities in U.S. dry forests .............................................. 11 GOALS, SCOPE, & ORGANIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ...................................................................12 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................................14 Scoping meetings ..........................................................................................................................................14 Literature search and criteria for inclusion..................................................................................................14 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................................................15 Inland Pacific Northwest ..............................................................................................................................15 Rocky Mountains ...........................................................................................................................................20 Sierra Nevada ...............................................................................................................................................23 Southeastern United States ...........................................................................................................................24 Eastern Deciduous Forest .............................................................................................................................26 Effects of fire on rare, threatened, or endangered plants..............................................................................28 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................................30 Intensity, frequency, and season of disturbance ............................................................................................30 Seed sources ..................................................................................................................................................32 Time since disturbance ..................................................................................................................................32 Rare, threatened, and endangered species ....................................................................................................33 CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................................33 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................35 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................39 Table 1 ...........................................................................................................................................................39 Table 2 ...........................................................................................................................................................42 Table 3 ...........................................................................................................................................................45 Table 4 ...........................................................................................................................................................52 Table 5 ...........................................................................................................................................................64 Table 6 ...........................................................................................................................................................98 Table 7 .........................................................................................................................................................100 Table 8 .........................................................................................................................................................101 Table 9 .........................................................................................................................................................102 Table 10 .......................................................................................................................................................106
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive River Management Plan
    September 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER SYSTEM Florida __________________________________________________________________________ The Wekiva Wild and Scenic River System was designated by an act of Congress on October 13, 2000 (Public Law 106-299). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 USC 1247) requires that each designated river or river segment must have a comprehensive river management plan developed. The Wekiva system has no approved plan in place. This document examines two alternatives for managing the Wekiva River System. It also analyzes the impacts of implementing each of the alternatives. Alternative A consists of the existing river management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the other alternative. It does not imply that no river management would occur. The concept for river management under alternative B would be an integrated program of goals, objectives, and actions for protecting and enhancing each outstandingly remarkable value. A coordinated effort among the many public agencies and entities would be needed to implement this alternative. Alternative B is the National Park Service’s and the Wekiva River System Advisory Management Committee’s preferred alternative. Implementing the preferred alternative (B) would result in coordinated multiagency actions that aid in the conservation or improvement of scenic values, recreation opportunities, wildlife and habitat, historic and cultural resources, and water quality and quantity. This would result in several long- term beneficial impacts on these outstandingly remarkable values. This Environmental Assessment was distributed to various agencies and interested organizations and individuals for their review and comment in August 2010, and has been revised as appropriate to address comments received.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Benning Training Areas
    FINAL REPORT Impacts of Military Training and Land Management on Threatened and Endangered Species in the Southeastern Fall Line Sandhills Communities SERDP Project SI-1302 MAY 2009 Dr. Rebecca R. Sharitz Dr. Donald W. Imm Ms. Kathryn R. Madden Dr. Beverly S. Collins Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia This document has been approved for public release. This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. i Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations …………………………………………………… iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………...v List of Tables……………………………………………………………………...vii Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………….viii 1. Executive Summary………..………………………………………………… 1 2. Objectives……………………………………………………………………. 5 3. Background………………………………………………....………………... 6 4. Materials and Methods……..………………………………………………… 8 4.1. Characterize sandhills and related xeric woodlands and discriminate from adjacent forests………………………………………………… 8 4.2. Spatial analyses and mapping of sandhills and related xeric woodland communities and comparison with spatial information on forest management and military activities………………………… 9 4.3. Effects of forest understory control practices used to maintain RCW habitat on sandhills plant communities………………………... 9 4.4. Habitat characterization of selected TES plant species……………… 10 4.5. Development of habitat models for TES plants and identification of potential additional suitable habitat……………………………….. 11 4.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 CREATING A WILDLIFE FRIENDLY YARD ......................................................................2 With Plant Variety Comes Wildlife Diversity...............................................................2 Existing Yards....................................................................................................2 Native Plants ......................................................................................................3 Why Choose Organic Fertilizers?......................................................................3 Butterfly Gardens...............................................................................................3 Fall Flower Garden Maintenance.......................................................................3 Water Availability..............................................................................................4 Bird Feeders...................................................................................................................4 Provide Grit to Assist with Digestion ................................................................5 Unwelcome Visitors at Your Feeders? ..............................................................5 Attracting Hummingbirds ..................................................................................5 Cleaning Bird Feeders........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Plant List Douglas County by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Douglas County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 29 Angelica arguta Sharp-tooth angelica Apiaceae 809 Angelica canbyi Canby's angelica Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 997 Lomatium canbyi Canby's desert-parsley Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 474 Osmorhiza chilensis Sweet-cicely Apiaceae 264 Osmorhiza occidentalis Western sweet-cicely Apiaceae 1044 Osmorhiza purpurea Purple sweet-cicely Apiaceae 492 Sanicula graveolens Northern Sierra) sanicle Apiaceae 699 Apocynum androsaemifolium Spreading dogbane Apocynaceae 813 Apocynum cannabinum Hemp dogbane Apocynaceae 681 Asclepias speciosa Showy milkweed Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • ES Hairy Rattleweed Pub11-14
    Publication WSFNR-21-09C February 2021 Endangered Species: HAIRY RATTLEWEED / COBWEBBY WILD INDIGO / FALSE WILD INDIGO Baptisia arachnifera Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources The hairy rattleweed is a unique plant of the Georgia Coastal Plain. It is perennial, multi- branched, 50-80cm (20-32 inches) tall with a reddish-brown stem covered by dense silvery-white tri- chomes (plant hairs). It is in the bean family. Leaves are nearly round or heart-shaped, alternate, 3-8cm (1.2-3.2 inches) long, 2-7cm (0.8-2.8 inches) wide, leathery, with upper surface green, bottom surface yellowish, & covered with long, silvery- white trichomes. Flowering is in late June to July. Flowers are bright yellow, pea-like, and grow in erect clusters at the branch tips above the leaves. Flowers have 5 petals. Fruiting is in late summer. Fruit is a bean- pod, densely covered with trichomes, 8-15mm (0.3-0.6 inches) long. The pod tapers into a long, thin point nearly as long as the body. Hairy rattleweed is found on sandy soils in open pine woods or mixed pine-hardwoods in the southeast Coastal Plain. It is found along low, sandy ridges in pine-palmetto-gallberry flatwoods and along sandy roadsides, old fields, and under open pine plantations. This species is fire dependent and is most abundant after fire. Thinning, cutting, and burning forest sites may improve habitat. Site/soil disturbance, moderate shading, and heavy grazing destroys habitat. Figure 1 shows a general distribution of this species across the Southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhexia January 20
    The Rhexia Paynes Prairie Chapter of the Florida Native Plant Society www.paynesprairie.fnpschapter January 2020 January General Meeting Overview of the SJRWMD with Jennifer Mitchell, Public Communications Coordinator Tuesday, January 21, 2019, 7:00 p.m. Plant ID Workshop at 6:30 p.m. Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship Hall, 4225 NW 34th Street, Gainesville, FL 32605 Jennifer Mitchell is Public Communica- grow, we must reduce per capita water usage tions Coordinator with the St. Johns River Wa- to ensure adequate water supply for people ter Management District. Her presentation will and nature. Learn more about how the district give an overview of the District including in- is working to protect and restore the district formation on water use and district lands. lands in your area. Established in 1972, the district is an envi- Jennifer is passionate about Florida’s in- ronmental regulatory agency of the state. In credible water resources and hopes to spark this presentation, learn what the district does interest in what you can do to help protect Flor- to accomplish its four missions of providing ida’s waterways. After earning her Ph.D. in water quality, water supply, flood protection, Forest Ecology from Auburn University, she and maintaining natural systems. Our district completed a post-doc at the University of Flor- properties are one facet of accomplishing ida in Soil and Water Science. Because she these missions. realizes that greater results will come from more In 2018, 980 million gallons of water were used a day community participation, she now works to spread the across the SJRWMD.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminole State Forest Soils Map
    EXHIBIT I Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Lands Management Procedures for Archaeological and Historical Sites and Properties on State-Owned or Controlled Properties (revised February 2007) These procedures apply to state agencies, local governments, and non-profits that manage state- owned properties. A. General Discussion Historic resources are both archaeological sites and historic structures. Per Chapter 267, Florida Statutes, ‘Historic property’ or ‘historic resource’ means any prehistoric district, site, building, object, or other real or personal property of historical, architectural, or archaeological value, and folklife resources. These properties or resources may include, but are not limited to, monuments, memorials, Indian habitations, ceremonial sites, abandoned settlements, sunken or abandoned ships, engineering works, treasure trove, artifacts, or other objects with intrinsic historical or archaeological value, or any part thereof, relating to the history, government, and culture of the state.” B. Agency Responsibilities Per State Policy relative to historic properties, state agencies of the executive branch must allow the Division of Historical Resources (Division) the opportunity to comment on any undertakings, whether these undertakings directly involve the state agency, i.e., land management responsibilities, or the state agency has indirect jurisdiction, i.e. permitting authority, grants, etc. No state funds should be expended on the undertaking until the Division has the opportunity to review and comment on the project, permit, grant, etc. State agencies shall preserve the historic resources which are owned or controlled by the agency. Regarding proposed demolition or substantial alterations of historic properties, consultation with the Division must occur, and alternatives to demolition must be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Klickitat Trail: Upper Swale Canyon
    Upper Swale Canyon Klickitat Trail Accessed from Harms Road via the Centerville Highway Klickitat County, WA T3N R14E S20, 21, 2227, 28 Compiled by Paul Slichter. Updated May 30, 2010 Flora Northwest- http://science.halleyhosting.com Common Name Scientific Name Family Burr Chervil Anthriscus caucalis Apiaceae Canby's Desert Parsley Lomatium canbyi Apiaceae *Columbia Desert Parsley Lomatium columbianum Apiaceae Fernleaf Desert Parsley Lomatium dissectum v. dissectum Apiaceae Pungent Desert Parsley Lomatium grayi Apiaceae Broadnineleaf Desert Parsley Lomatium triternatum v. anomalum Apiaceae Biscuitroot Lomatium macrocarpum Apiaceae Barestem Desert Parsley Lomatium nudicaule Apiaceae Salt and Pepper Lomatium piperi Apiaceae Nine-leaf Desert Parsley Lomatium triternatum (v. ?) Apiaceae Gairdner's Yampah Perideridia gairdneri ssp. borealis ? Apiaceae Yarrow Achillea millefolium Asteraceae Low Pussytoes Antennaria dimorpha Asteraceae Narrowleaf Pussytoes Antennaria stenophylla Asteraceae Balsamroot Balsamorhiza careyana ? Asteraceae Bachelor's Button Centaurea cyanus Asteraceae Hoary False Yarrow Chaenactis douglasii Asteraceae Chicory Cichorum intybus Asteraceae Canada Thistle Cirsium arvense Asteraceae Hall's Goldenweed Columbiadoria hallii Asteraceae Western Hawksbeard Crepis intermedia Asteraceae Western Hawksbeard Crepis occidentalis ? Asteraceae Gold Stars Crocidium multicaule Asteraceae Gray Rabbitbrush Ericameria nauseosum Asteraceae Oregon Sunshine Eriophyllum integrifolium v. integrifolium Asteraceae Gumweed Grindelia (columbiana?)
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PALM 31 3 Working.Indd
    Volume 31: Number 3 > 2014 The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Palmetto Rare Plant Conservation at Bok Tower Gardens ● Yaupon Redeemed ● The Origin of Florida Scrub Plant Diversity Donna Bollenbach and Juliet Rynear A Collaboration of Passion, Purpose and Science Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program “Today nearly 30 percent of the native fl ora in the United States is considered to be 1 of conservation concern. Without human intervention, many of these plants may be gone within our lifetime. Eighty percent of the at-risk species are closely related to plants with economic value somewhere in the world, and more than 50 percent are related to crop species...but it can be saved.” – Center for Plant Conservation Ask the average Florida citizen to name at least one endangered native animal in the state and they will likely mention the Florida manatee or the Florida panther. Ask the same person to name one endangered native plant and they give you a blank stare. Those of us working to conserve Florida’s unique plant species know this all 2 too well, and if the job isn’t diffi cult enough, a lack of funding and support for the conservation of land supporting imperiled plant communities makes it harder. Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program is one of 39 botanical institutions throughout the United States that collaborate with the Center for Plant Conservation (CPC) to prevent the extinction of native plants in the United States. Created in 1984, CPC institutions house over 750 living specimens of the nation’s most endangered native plants, the largest living collection of rare plants in the world.
    [Show full text]