DOCSLIB.ORG

LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2 NEC Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2 NEC Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2 NEC Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016 INTERNATIONAL 04 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn 42 International Work/Westminster 07 Introduction from Tom Watson Foundation for Democracy 08 2015/ 2016 National Executive Committee 43 EPLP Report 10 NEC Committees 11 Obituaries NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016 12 NEC Aims and Objectives for 2016 LABOUR PARTY MANAGEMENT 13 Introduction from the 46 Human Resources Report General Secretary NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016 STABILITY IN OUR FINANCES ELECTIONS 2016 16 Jon Trickett, Election Co-Ordinator 48 Stability and Progress within the Party 17 Analysis of results and Local Elections 49 Fundraising and The Thousand Club 18 London Mayoral 50 Events and Endorsements 2015/16 21 Bristol Mayoral Election May 2016 53 Financial Statements for the year ended 22 Scotland Report 31 December 2015 23 Wales Report 54 Treasurers’ Report 24 Local Government Report 56 Administrative Information 25 PCC Elections 58 Statement of Registered Treasurer’s Responsibilities 26 Parliamentary By-Elections 59 Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of The Labour Party NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016 EUROPEAN REFERENDUM 60 Consolidated Income And Expenditure Account for the year ended 31 December 30 Labour In for Britain - 2015 EU Referendum Campaign 61 Statements of Comprehensive Income and Changes in Equity for the year NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016/17 LOOKING AHEAD: ended 31 December 2015 2017 ELECTIONS 62 Consolidated Balance Sheet at 31 December 2015 32 2017 Elections 63 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the 33 Boundary Review year Ended 31 December 2015 64 Notes to Financial Statements NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016/17 LOOKING AHEAD: MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS APPENDICES 36 Renewing our Party and Building 80 Parliamentary Labour Party an Active Membership and Supporters 86 Members of the Scottish Parliament Network 87 Members of the Welsh Assembly 37 Equality 88 Members of the European Parliament 89 Members of the London Assembly NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2016/17 LOOKING AHEAD: AGENDA 2020 90 Directly Elected Mayors 91 Leaders of Labour Groups 40 National Policy Forum 99 Labour Peers 102 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners 103 NEC Disputes 106 NCC Cases INTRODUCTION FOREWORD FROM JEREMY CORBYN Our party has become a mass movement, of over half a million members – and we have welcomed back the Fire Brigades Union to affiliation in the last year. This isn’t just an increase in membership, it’s a transformation – trebling our base in little over a year. We are the largest party in Britain – and have more members than all other political parties combined. We are also the largest party of the left in Europe. Together we have a huge opportunity to engage more people in politics and must change how we operate as a party. If we can use the immense resources we now have, we will be an unstoppable force to win the next election. Despite their change of leadership, the Tories continue to privatise all they can and inflict deep cuts on local government, so it is a difficult time to be a Labour councillor. Our Labour councillors are speaking up for their local communities and showing Labour values in action in their councils. And we welcome Bristol Council back to Labour. With new Labour mayors in Bristol and London joining our complement of councils and directly elected leaders, and new Police & Crime Commissioners in Cheshire, Gwent, Humberside and Leicestershire – we are having more influence in more communities. We need to renew our policies – involving the whole party in this task so our policies are relevant and speak to people in all parts of our country. The referendum vote in June exposed that too many people feel the status quo is not working for them. Too many communities feel left behind – and we must explain why Labour has the answers to rebuild them. We want a society in which no one and no community is left behind. This has been a traumatic year for our party as we responded to the shocking murder of Jo Cox MP. We will remember her humanity, her passion and compassion this week. Whatever our differences in the party and as we debate this week, we must remember that we have more in common than what divides us. So I ask everyone to engage in debate in a comradely, respectful and honest way. We achieve more together than we do alone and, if we stay united, there is no reason why we cannot transform our country and the lives of the people who need a Labour government. Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party 4 NEC Annual Report 2016 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION FROM TOM WATSON These are turbulent times. It would be wrong to argue that this has not been a difficult year for our party. But we have been through tough times before and emerged stronger. We will do so again. Jeremy’s election enthused tens of thousands of people who had given up on politics to sign up as members. Thousands more felt compelled to leave other parties to join us. At the time of writing we now have over half a million members, nearly as many as the other major political parties combined. That’s Jeremy’s lasting legacy and one we should be proud of. The financial support from our supporters and members has helped stabilise our party’s finances. This is good news, but ultimately we will only be judged on our ability to win political power in order to exercise it on behalf of the people who need Labour governments. That is the only measurement that counts. We have had some great electoral successes in the last twelve months, most notably in the capital city. I was delighted and proud to see Sadiq Khan win the London mayoralty convincingly. We won mayoral contests across the country, retained seats in council by-elections and welcomed talented new colleagues to the House of Commons. Yet we did not get the result we campaigned for in the European referendum. I would particularly like to thank the staff who worked so tirelessly on the ‘Labour In for Britain’ campaign during the referendum. The fact that we did not get the result we hoped for was not a reflection on them. The decision to leave the EU will have profound consequences for our country. Our priority now is to ensure the communities we represent receive the best deal possible as part of the UK’s settlement with the EU. The referendum result provided a dramatic illustration of how rapidly the political landscape can be transformed. One Conservative Prime Minister was replaced by another within days but the Tory message remains the same, even when the face at the top changes. Every Conservative administration makes cuts that have a devastating effect on those who can least afford it. Labour was founded to stand up for working people in Parliament and we will continue to do so no matter what cosmetic changes the Tory party makes. The last twelve months have shown us that political certainties can crumble overnight. If we stand united against the Tories, Labour can regain power. Finally, we lost a much-loved colleague tragically early this year. Jo Cox was our future. I know I speak for you when I say our love and thoughts are with her family. Tom Watson, Deputy Leader of the Labour Party NEC Annual Report 2016 7 INTRODUCTION 2015/ 2016 NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The National Executive Committee (NEC) is the governing body of the Labour Party. It oversees the overall direction of the party and the policy making process and sets strategic objectives on an annual basis, meeting regularly to review the work of the party. Members are shown below. Additionally the PLP Shadow Chief Whip (Rosie Winterton MP) and PLP Chair (John Cryer MP) without a vote. Leader Deputy Leader Treasurer Shadow Shadow Jeremy Corbyn MP Tom Watson MP Diana Holland Frontbench Frontbench Jon Trickett MP Rebecca Long-Bailey MP Shadow EPLP Leader Young Labour Div. I – Div. I – Frontbench Glenis Willmott MEP Jasmin Beckett Trade Unions Trade Unions Jonathan Keith Birch (Unison) Jim Kennedy (Unite) Ashworth MP Div. I – Div. I – Div. I – Div. I – Div. I – Trade Unions Trade Unions Trade Unions Trade Unions Trade Unions Andi Fox (TSSA) Pauline McCarthy Paddy Lillis (Usdaw) Wendy Nichols Andy Kerr (CWU) (Bakers) (Unison) 8 NEC Annual Report 2016 INTRODUCTION 2015/ 2016 NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Div. I – Div. I – Div. I – Div.I – Trade Div.I – Trade Trade Unions Trade Unions Trade Unions Unions Unions Martin Mayer Mary Turner (GMB) Jennie Formby Cath Speight (GMB) Jamie Bramwell (Unite) (Unite) (UCATT) Div. II – Socialist Div. II – Socialist Div. III – CLPs Div. III – CLPs Div. III – CLPs Societies Societies Ann Black Ellie Reeves Johanna Baxter James Asser Keith Vaz Div. III – CLPs Div. III – CLPs Div. III – CLPs Div. IV – Labour Div. IV – Labour Darren Williams Pete Willsman Christine Shawcroft Councillors Councillors Ann Lucas Alice Perry Div. V – PLP/EPLP Div. V – PLP/EPLP Div. V – PLP/EPLP Dennis Skinner MP Margaret Shabana Beckett MP Mahmood MP NEC Annual Report 2016 9 INTRODUCTION NEC COMMITTEES The following are sub-commitees of the NEC: Business Board The board is responsible for overseeing the business functions of the organisation, including the management of finances. Audit and Risk Management Committee This meets to scrutinise the proposed budget, the audited accounts and the business plan and to consider management data. Joint Policy Committee The Joint Policy Committee (JPC) has strategic oversight of policy development through overseeing the rolling programme of policy making. The JPC acts as the steering group for the National Policy Forum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re-Tweeting Election #Ge11 Aodhán O Ríordáin TD
    Re-Tweeting Election #ge11 Aodhán O Ríordáin TD 1 Re-Tweeting Election #ge11 Introduction The 2011 General Election was the first Twitter Election in Ireland. The appetite for increased engagement, accountability and interaction via the social media platform followed the resignation of Defence Minister Willie O’Dea in February 2010, in part because of a carefully composed tweet. By January 2011, Twitter was part of the daily political discourse, as candidates posted their thoughts, policies, pictures and links in the competitive war to raise profiles and attract eyeballs. The beauty of Twitter is that it allows your ‘followers’ to view you in a different lens from the normal political script, and to engage with you on a variety of topics political, personal, trivial and even philosophical. It also allows politicians break some news at appropriate times, and share views on national events without the constraints of a formal press release. This ebook is based on all the tweets published over the course of the General Election campaign, from the announcement of Labour’s motion of no confidence in the government to the day of the election result. It is important to consider that the commentary on the tweets was completed in the months immediately after the election in February 2011, when my memory of events and emotions was still raw and fresh, and not two years later. Therefore, the commentary provided is frozen in 2011 and has not been altered to take account of two years in government and developments in 2013. The tweets and reflections are frozen in time.
    [Show full text]
  • City Hall Rich List 2020
    City Hall Rich List 2020 Darwin Friend June 2020 Introduction Scrutinising staffing costs at local and national level is a hallmark of our mission to make government more accountable to taxpayers. This principle underpins our annual Town Hall Rich List, which details remuneration of the highest paid people across local government.1 It should also apply to municipal government. The Greater London Authority (GLA) is one of the biggest local authorities in the UK; it includes a number of well-known bodies and a powerful mayor. Sadiq Khan, the current mayor of London, has complained about financial woes, while the staffing costs of City Hall employees have risen by 82 per cent, from £36 million in 2016-17 to £65.5 million in the 2020-21 proposed budget.2 Meanwhile, the mayor has increased the band D council tax precept by just under nine per cent in 2019-20, and London taxpayers have gone from paying £295 in 2015-16 to £332 in 2020-21 for the GLA.3,4 The City Hall Rich List details the employees working for the Greater London Authority, Transport for London, London Fire Brigade and Metropolitan Police whose total remuneration exceeds £100,000. Key findings ▪ There were at least 654 people employed by the GLA and its subsidiary bodies in 2018-19 who received more than £100,000. Of these, 154 received over £150,000 in total remuneration. In 2015-16, 653 received more than £100,000 and 147 employees collected over £150,000. ▪ In 2018-19 the body with the highest number of employees with remuneration in excess of £100,000 was Transport for London, with 518 employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report 793 795 London Road
    793-795 London Road - proposed red route restrictions Consultation summary July 2016 Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Background ................................................................................................................ 2 2 Scheme description .................................................................................................... 2 3 The consultation ......................................................................................................... 4 4 Overview of consultation responses ............................................................................ 5 5 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ........................................... 7 6 Conclusion and next steps .......................................................................................... 7 Appendix A – Response to issues raised .............................................................................. 8 Appendix B – Consultation Materials ..................................................................................... 9 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted ....................................................................... 13 Executive Summary Between 5 February and 17 March 2017, we consulted on proposed changes to parking restrictions at the area in front of 793-795 London Road, Croydon. The consultation received 11 responses, with 7 responses supporting or partially supporting
    [Show full text]
  • National Policy Forum (NPF) Report 2018
    REPORT 2018 @LabPolicyForum #NPFConsultation2018 National Policy Forum Report 2018 XX National Policy Forum Report 2018 Contents NPF Elected Officers ....................................................................................................................4 Foreword ........................................................................................................................................5 About this document ...................................................................................................................6 Policy Commission Annual Reports Early Years, Education and Skills ............................................................................................7 Economy, Business and Trade ............................................................................................. 25 Environment, Energy and Culture ....................................................................................... 39 Health and Social Care ........................................................................................................... 55 Housing, Local Government and Transport ..................................................................... 71 International ............................................................................................................................. 83 Justice and Home Affairs ....................................................................................................... 99 Work, Pensions and Equality ..............................................................................................119
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Cancers: the Added Value of Closer Cooperation’
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Workshop ‘Rare Cancers: The added value of closer cooperation’ Brussels 12 July 2011 PROCEEDINGS Abstract This document summarises the presentations and discussions at the Workshop on Rare Cancers: The added value of cooperation held at the European Parliament in Brussels on Tuesday 12 July 2011. The aim of the workshop was to review this issue with representatives of EU institutions, patient associations as well as scientific experts, in the context of the expected update of the Clinical Trials Directive. The meeting also aimed at increasing awareness about the importance of Rare Cancers. The workshop was co-chaired by Glenis WILLMOTT and Alojz PETERLE, MEPs on behalf of the Working Group Health of the European Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI). IP/A/ENVI/WS/2011-03 August 2011 PE 464.440 EN Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ This workshop was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. COMPILERS-EDITORS Kerina Tull Vanessa Leigh Tony Zamparutti Milieu Ltd. Brussels, Belgium RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATORS-REVIEWERS AND FINAL EDITORS Dr Purificación TEJEDOR DEL REAL Dr Marcelo SOSA IUDICISSA Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail:
    [Show full text]
  • Call List for Wed 17 Jun 2020
    Issued on: 16 June at 6.18pm Call lists for Wednesday 17 June 2020 A list of Members, both virtually and physically pres- ent, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial State- ments; and a list of Members physically present to participate in substantive proceedings. CONTENTS 1. Oral Questions to the Minister for Women and Equalities 3 2. Oral Questions to the Prime MinIster 8 3. Urgent Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care if he will make a statement on Coronavirus (Jonathan Ashworth) 11 4. Ministerial Statement: Secretary of State for International Trade on update on the UK’s position on accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership 15 2 Call lists for Wednesday 17 June 2020 5. Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords]: Committee of the whole House 18 6. Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords]: Third Reading 20 Call lists for Wednesday 17 June 2020 3 ORAL QUESTIONS TO THE MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITIES After prayers Order Member Question Party Vir- Minister tual/ replying Physi- cal 1 Theresa Villi- What steps the Con Phys- Minister ers (Chipping Government is ical Scully Barnet) taking to support self-employed women during the covid-19 out- break. 2 + 3 Ruth Cadbury What steps she Lab Phys- Minister (Brentford and has taken in ical Badenoch Isleworth) response to the findings on the risks of covid-19 for BAME people in Public Health England's report entitled COVID- 19: review of disparities in risks and outcomes, published in June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • General Secretary‟S Report
    GENERAL SECRETARY‟S REPORT ANNUAL CONGRESS 2014 Capital FM Arena, Nottingham CONGRESS – SUNDAY 8 JUNE - MONDAY 9 JUNE 9.30 am - 12.30 pm, 2.00 pm - 5.30 pm CONGRESS – WEDNESDAY 11 JUNE 9.30 am - 12.30 pm, 2.00 pm - 5.30 pm CONGRESS – THURSDAY 12 JUNE 9.30 am – close of business PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 GENERAL SECRETARY‟S INTRODUCTION Dear Colleagues A very warm welcome to the 2014 Congress here in the wonderful city of Nottingham. On behalf of our President, the one and only Mary Turner and our outstanding Vice-President Malcolm Sage, the Executive Council and the Senior Management Team we all hope you have an enjoyable week. GMB Congress is the process of reviewing what we have achieved during the past year and renewing our goals for the years ahead. During the last ten years our GMB has gone from the verge of being swallowed up by predator Unions to a feared opponent whose strengths are built on solid finances and a renewed hunger for the Social Justice which brought our Union into existence some 125 years ago. The GMB doesn't lurch from side to side either Industrially or Politically. Our values are constant. Our members interests are the Union's interests. In recent years we have led the charge on campaigns like Private Equity asset strippers, Standards for Care Home residents and staff, exposing Blacklisting and the scandal surrounding the Housing Benefit bill where billions end up in the off shore tax havens of fat cat Landlords instead of being used to Build the homes we need to house so many families and single people who are struggling under the Thatcher legacy which saw our National Housing Stock sold off and never replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
    Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Love Lane, Woolwich
    Simon Fowler Avison Young – UK By email only Our Ref: APP/E5330/W/19/3233519 Date: 30 July 2020 Dear Sir CORRECTION NOTICE UNDER SECTION 57 OF THE PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 Land at Love Lane, Grand Depot Road, John Wilson Street, Thomas Street, and Woolwich New Road, Woolwich SE18 6SJ for 1. A request for a correction has been received from Winckworth Sherwood on behalf of the Appellant’s in respect of the Secretary of State’s decision letter on the above case dated 3 June 2020. This request was made before the end of the relevant period for making such corrections under section 56 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (the Act), and a decision has been made by the Secretary of State to correct the error. 2. There is a clear typographical error in the IR, specifically at IR12.18 where there is an incorrect reference to Phase 4 when the intention was to refer to Phase 3. The correction relates to this reference only and is reflected in the revised Inspector’s report attached to this letter. 3. Under the provisions of section 58(1) of the Act, the effect of the correction referred to above is that the original decision is taken not to have been made. The decision date for this appeal is the date of this notice, and an application may be made to the High Court within six weeks from the day after the date of this notice for leave to bring a statutory review under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Friday Volume 637 16 March 2018 No. 112 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 16 March 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1113 16 MARCH 2018 1114 De Cordova, Marsha McDonald, Stuart C. House of Commons Debbonaire, Thangam Merriman, Huw Dinenage, Caroline Milling, Amanda Docherty-Hughes, Martin Monaghan, Carol Friday 16 March 2018 Dodds, Anneliese Morris, David Donelan, Michelle Morton, Wendy The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Dowden, Oliver Nandy, Lisa Duffield, Rosie Neill, Robert Edwards, Jonathan Newlands, Gavin PRAYERS Ellman, Mrs Louise Nokes, rh Caroline Farron, Tim O’Hara, Brendan Field, rh Mark Owen, Albert [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Fletcher, Colleen Pennycook, Matthew Foster, Kevin Philp, Chris 9.34 am Foxcroft, Vicky Pincher, Christopher Freer, Mike Pollard, Luke Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): I beg to Furniss, Gill Pound, Stephen move, That the House sit in private. Gaffney, Hugh Pow, Rebecca Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163). Gardiner, Barry Pursglove, Tom The House proceeded to a Division. Gethins, Stephen Quin, Jeremy Gibb, rh Nick Reeves, Ellie Gibson, Patricia Robinson, Mary Mr Speaker: Will the Serjeant at Arms please investigate Grady, Patrick Saville Roberts, Liz the delay in the Aye Lobby, which I have reason to Grant, Peter Shelbrooke, Alec believe is not heavily populated? Green, Chris Sheppard,
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Diary 2015–16
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2015–16 18 May 2015 to 12 May 2016 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2015–16, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes, unless stated otherwise (and are not itemised in the analysis). (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14j of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 7. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing in the 21St Century
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Policing in the 21st Century Seventh Report of Session 2007–08 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 30 October 2008 HC 364-II Published on 10 October 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a Member of the Committee during the inquiry: Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]