DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources Assessment 10336 Alder Avenue Industrial Project Appendix C General Biological Resources Assessment ALDER LOGISTICAL CENTER PROJECT May 2019 General Biological Resources Assessment Fontana United States Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangles Map San Bernardino Base and Meridian Township 1 South, Range 5 West, Sections 20 and 21. Assessor Parcel Numbers 025213103, 025213104, 025213136, 025213141 and 025213143 Owner SRPF B/10336 ALDER, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company. Prepared By Lenny Malo MS, Lincoln Hulse BS, Dale Powell PhD and Erin Serra BS 16361 Scientific Way, Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 467-9100 General Biological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 PROJECT AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION........................................................................................ 2-1 3.0 FOCUSED STUDY/SPECIES OF CONCERN ....................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 GENERAL BIOLOGICAL SURVEY RESULTS ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types ................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 Special-Status Plants ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.4 Special-Status Wildlife ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.5 Wetland and Waterways ..................................................................................................... 5-2 6.0 IMPACTS ........................................................................................................................................ 6-1 7.0 PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................ 7-3 8.0 CERTIFICATION .............................................................................................................................. 8-1 9.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 9-1 FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Location ................................................................................................................ 2-2 Figure 2 Site Vicinity .......................................................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 3 Vegetation Communities and Land Cover Types ................................................................ 5-3 Figure 4 Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 5-4 Figure 5 Critical Habitat .................................................................................................................... 5-5 Figure 6 Soils ..................................................................................................................................... 5-6 Figure 7 National Wetland Inventory ............................................................................................... 5-7 APPENDICES Appendix A Photograph Log Appendix B Special-Status Species Potential for Occurrence within the Project Site Appendix C Plant Species Observed within the Study Area Appendix D Wildlife Species Observed within the Study Area Page i General Biological Resources Assessment 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NOREAS Inc. (NOREAS) is pleased to provide this Biological Technical Report for the Alder Logistical Center Project (hereafter referred to as the “Project”). The Project is located at the north terminus of Alder Avenue, near the Union pacific Rail Road tracks in Fontana, California (Figure 1). This report documents the findings of baseline biological resources surveys and habitat assessments for the Project. The intended use of this document is to disclose and evaluate Project conditions, to determine the potential for occurrence of common and special-status species, and their habitats, within study area limits. For the purposes of this report, the “study area” includes the Project’s proposed ground disturbance footprint (Project Site), and a buffer (Figure 2). Only developed and disturbed land cover types were detected within the study area during pedestrian surveys in 2019. As such, greater than 99% of the study area is comprised of developed, disturbed and/or non-native plant and wildlife habitats. The Project is not collocated with any United States Fish and Wildlife Service designated critical habitat, nor were any special status species detected within the study area during the 2019 field survey events. No nesting birds, remnant raptor nests, or bat guano were detected within the Project Site either. The extent of anthropogenic disturbance within the Project Site and in the region, have substantially decreased the Project Site’s value as suitable breeding, nesting, refuge and foraging habitat for native and special status species as well. The Project Site also has limited – if any, value as a low quality migration corridor - or overland dispersal habitat for wildlife, because the Project is severely movement constrained by surrounding residential and commercial developments, and public infrastructure (i.e., interstate highway, paved roads, rail roads, residential houses, vacant lots, parking and industrial complexes, etc.). Nonetheless, the study area is within the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis [DSF]) Jurupa Recovery Unit. To that end, portions of the Project Site have been mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey as being comprised of Delhi Sand soils. Delhi Sand soils are wind deposited (aeolian), the boundaries established by USDA- NRCS are not exact and change over time. Based on the results of the survey, surface soils present on the Project Site were determined not to contain clean Delhi Sand soils. As a result, the Project Site was determined not to have the potential to provide suitable habitat for DSF and it is assumed that DSF is absent from it. Further – and as detailed to some extent above, the Project Site is surrounded by existing development on all of its sides, and no longer has connectivity to areas containing clean Delhi Sands soils, or locales subject to Aeolian processes. Therefore, development of this Project would not be expected to impact DSF or impede the species recovery as defined by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) DSF Recovery Plan (1997). In summary, given the extent of disturbance present, the Project Site lacks the substantive habitat needed to support special status species; and any common species currently using these lands are assumed to be acclimated to the human influenced environment that exists there. Therefore, the permanent habitat loss associated with the Project would be considered an insignificant effect, as a result of the amount of higher value native vegetation communities and land cover types within the region that are already held in conservation (or designated as open space) in San Bernardino County. Page 1-1 General Biological Resources Assessment 2.0 PROJECT AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Project will consist of an approximate 174,780 square foot high cube warehouse which is to include office space and parking in Fontana, California (Figure 1). For the purposes of this report, the “study area” includes the Project’s proposed ground disturbance footprint (Project Site) and a buffer (Figure 2). The Project can be found on the Fontana United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map within San Bernardino Base and Meridian – Township 1 South, Range 5 west, Sections 20 and 21 (USGS 1989). The vast majority of the study area is limited to disturbed and developed land cover types. Page 2-1 R T 1 S Randall Ave 5 W San Bernardino Ave San Bernardino Ave Alder Ave Alder Sierra Ave Sierra Marigold Ave Ave Cedar Valley Blvd ¨¦§10 Slover Ave Cedar Ave Cedar Alder Ave Alder Laurel Ave Laurel Ave Linden Maple Ave Maple Locust Ave Locust Sierra Ave Sierra Tamarind Ave Tamarind Juniper Ave Juniper ProductionAve Santa Ana Ave Jurupa Ave 5 Statewide Location Regional Location Miles ° Study Area 0 1,000 2,000 Project Site Feet Copyright: © 20131 National inch = 2,000 Geographic feet Society° Freeway (inset) Major Road (inset) Forest or Park (inset) Data Sources: - BLM accessed Jun 2019 Water Body (inset) - ESRI US Topo Maps accessed Jun 2019 - Lake Creek Industrial LLC 2018 The site is located in the City of Fontana, Map Prepared: 6-6-19 San Bernardino County, on the Fontana USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map. San Bernardino Base and Meridian, Township 1 South, Prepared by: Range 5 West, Sections 20 and 21. Study Area Center coordinates are: Latitude 34.065616, Longitude -117.419255 C:\SRM\Noreas\AlderLogistics\Fig1. RegionalLocation.mxd Figure 1. Regional Location 0 0.125 0.25 Mile 1 inch = 0.25 mile ° Study Area (51 acres) Data Sources: Project Site (9.5 acres) - Bing accessed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Delhi Sands Flowerloving Fly Survey Report 2010
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) Survey Report 2010 23 March 2011 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Survey Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 SURVEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................2 METHODS………… ....................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING...........................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE SELECTION AND TRANSECT PLACEMENT ..................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS........................................................................................................................5 DATA ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................................6 RESULTS…….. ............................................................................................................................................6 DISCUSSION….. ........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 805.921.0683 Cell: 805.415.9595 Em
    July 11, 2018 Mr. Tal Shoshan, CEO c/o T-Rose Investments, LLC 3880 E. Ebony Ontario, CA 91761 SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, 2.76-acre Site, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Shoshan: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a ±2.76-acre site to support the federally-listed endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis-DSFF). Introduction The subject 2.76-acre site is regionally located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). More specifically, the site is located north of 4th Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, west of Center Avenue, and south of Trademark Street; Township 1 South, Range 7 West, Section 14 on the “Guasti” USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Plate 2). Plate 3 provides an aerial photograph of the site. In order to meet the environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occurring sensitive biological resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant’s conformance to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. As such, this report is intended to provide biological information to the applicant and reviewing agencies in support of the environmental review process. Selected Species Overview The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) listed the DSFF as an endangered species on September 23, 1993. This species is only known to occur in association with Delhi sand deposits (FWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sites within a radius of about eight miles in the cities of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation
    Appendix C Habitat Suitability Evaluation, Arborist Report, and Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation FONTANA FOOTHILLS COMMERCE CENTER DRAFT EIR Habitat Suitability Evaluation April 15, 2020 Chad Manista REDA Acquisitions, LLC 4450 MacArthur Blvd., Ste. 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, ±33-acre Site, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California Dear Chad: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a 33-acre site to support special-status biological resources in support of the environmental review process. Introduction The study area is regionally located in San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). Specifically, the project site is located in the City of Fontana (City), generally south of Santa Ana Avenue, east of Juniper Avenue, north of Jurupa Avenue, and west of Sierra Avenue. The site occurs on the “Fontana” USGS 7.5- minute topographic map (Plate 2). The site occurs on the "Fontana" 7.5-minute USGS Quadrangle Map, Township 1 South, Range 5 West, Section 30. Projects proposed in this area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensitive biological resources must demonstrate to reviewing agencies that potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources are adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. Accordingly, results of this habitat suitability evaluation are intended to provide the applicant and resource agencies with preliminary biological information required for planning and permitting decisions concerning the proposed project. Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal or habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of certain sensitive biological resources cannot necessarily be made in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2021 Long Range Objectives
    © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL © 2010-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL RIVERSIDE-CORONA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT RESOURCECONSERVATION RIVERSIDE-CORONA 2016-2021 Objectives Long Range © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO Plan willbedevelopedforeachyearbasedonthislongtermactionplan. Annual Work An within willbeusedtoplanfutureprojects,programming,anddistrictoperations. The objectivesprovided Riverside-Corona ResourceConservationDistrict(RCRCD)(District). This documentisanassessmentoftheresourcemanagementandoutreachneeds 2016-2021 Objectives Long Range ©© 2014-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL Riverside-Corona ResourceConservationDistrict 2 3 Long Range Objectives 2016-2021 Contents About the RCRCD 5 Programs 9 Assist Land Users with Resource Planning and Management 10 Conserve Habitat Land and Species 11 Foster Stewardship through Education, Citizen Science and Outreach 20 Goals and Objectives 28 GOAL 1—Assist Land Users with Resource Planning and Management 29 GOAL 2—Conserve Habitat Land and Species 31 GOAL 3—Foster Stewardship through Education, Citizen Science, and Outreach 34 GOAL 4—Help Create Sustainable Communities and Partnerships 39 GOAL 5—Conduct Programs Efficiently 41 Land Uses 45 Native Habitats 45 Urban and Surburban Areas 46 Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Explorations in Ethnobiology: the Legacy of Amadeo Rea
    Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Copyright 2013 ISBN-10: 0988733013 ISBN-13: 978-0-9887330-1-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012956081 Society of Ethnobiology Department of Geography University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #305279 Denton, TX 76203-5017 Cover photo: Amadeo Rea discussing bird taxonomy with Mountain Pima Griselda Coronado Galaviz of El Encinal, Sonora, Mexico, July 2001. Photograph by Dr. Robert L. Nagell, used with permission. Contents Preface to Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea . i Dana Lepofsky and Marsha Quinlan 1 . Diversity and its Destruction: Comments on the Chapters . .1 Amadeo M. Rea 2 . Amadeo M . Rea and Ethnobiology in Arizona: Biography of Influences and Early Contributions of a Pioneering Ethnobiologist . .11 R. Roy Johnson and Kenneth J. Kingsley 3 . Ten Principles of Ethnobiology: An Interview with Amadeo Rea . .44 Dana Lepofsky and Kevin Feeney 4 . What Shapes Cognition? Traditional Sciences and Modern International Science . .60 E.N. Anderson 5 . Pre-Columbian Agaves: Living Plants Linking an Ancient Past in Arizona . .101 Wendy C. Hodgson 6 . The Paleobiolinguistics of Domesticated Squash (Cucurbita spp .) . .132 Cecil H. Brown, Eike Luedeling, Søren Wichmann, and Patience Epps 7 . The Wild, the Domesticated, and the Coyote-Tainted: The Trickster and the Tricked in Hunter-Gatherer versus Farmer Folklore . .162 Gary Paul Nabhan 8 . “Dog” as Life-Form . .178 Eugene S. Hunn 9 . The Kasaga’yu: An Ethno-Ornithology of the Cattail-Eater Northern Paiute People of Western Nevada .
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3
    PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin Fall 2014 Volume 60 Number 3 Scientists proudly state their profession! In This Issue.............. Botany 2014 in Boise: a fantastic The season of awards......p. 119 Rutgers University. combating event......p.114 plant blindness.....p. 159 From the Editor Reclaim the name: #Iamabotanist is the latest PLANT SCIENCE sensation on the internet! Well, perhaps this is a bit of BULLETIN an overstatement, but for those of us in the discipline, Editorial Committee it is a real ego boost and a bit of ground truthing. We do identify with our specialties and subdisciplines, Volume 60 but the overarching truth that we have in common Christopher Martine is that we are botanists! It is especially timely that (2014) in this issue we publish two articles directly relevant Department of Biology to reclaiming the name. “Reclaim” suggests that Bucknell University there was something very special in the past that Lewisburg, PA 17837 perhaps has lost its luster and value. A century ago [email protected] botany was a premier scientific discipline in the life sciences. It was taught in all the high schools and most colleges and universities. Leaders of the BSA Carolyn M. Wetzel were national leaders in science and many of them (2015) had their botanical roots in Cornell University, as Biology Department well documented by Ed Cobb in his article “Cornell Division of Health and University Celebrates its Botanical Roots.” While Natural Sciences Cornell is exemplary, many institutions throughout Holyoke Community College the country, and especially in the Midwest, were 303 Homestead Ave leading botany to a position of distinction in the Holyoke, MA 01040 development of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program Arthropod 2018 Pilot Study Protocol
    Arthropod 2018 Pilot Study Protocol Western Riverside County MSHCP Biological Monitoring Program Arthropod 2018 Pilot Study Protocol INTRODUCTION The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan covers two insect species, one of which is the federally endangered Delhi sands flower-loving fly (Delhi fly, Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis). To date, conservation of the species within the Plan Area has only occurred within the Jurupa Hills Core Area (Teledyne site); therefore, this site must be able to support a healthy population of the Delhi fly. We will collect data regarding the food resources of larval Delhi fly, a stage which may last two years or longer depending on availability of food, temperature, rainfall, and other environmental conditions (USFWS 1997). These data will be coupled with environmental data collected via an on-site HOBO weather station and vegetation surveys to infer the quality of the Delhi sand dunes at Teledyne (Hulton et al. 2013). This survey is designed to provide researchers with information that could be used to improve the Delhi fly’s habitat and resource availability. By randomly placing arthropod pitfall traps across the site, we can collect more specific data on co-occurring arthropod species than the Delhi sands flower-loving fly surveys can provide alone in order to meet the goals and objectives listed below. Goals and Objectives 1. Gather data regarding co-occurring arthropod species within Core Areas. a. Use the data to track the relative abundance and richness of the arthropod community, which the predacious Delhi fly larvae presumably utilize as a food resource (Ken Osborne, consultant, personal communication).
    [Show full text]
  • D1) Biological Resources Existing Conditions
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices Appendix D: Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report June 2019 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks DRAFT San Bernardino Countywide Plan Biological Resources Existing Conditions Prepared for: County of San Bernardino Land Use Services Division, Advance Planning Division 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 1st Floor San Bernardino, California 94215-0182 Contact: Terri Rahhal Prepared by: 3544 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 Contact: Linda Archer DATA AND ANALYSIS AS NOVEMBER 2016 UPDATED WITH OUTREACH SUMMARY IN NOVEMBER 2018 DRAFTMAY 2019 D-1 REPORT USE, INTENT, AND LIMITATIONS This Background Report was prepared to inform the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be continuously updated and may contain out-of-date material and information. This report reflects data collected in 2016 and analyzed in 2016 and 2017 as part of due diligence and issue identification. This report is not intended to be comprehensive and does not address all issues that were or could have been considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan. Additionally, many other materials (reports, data, etc.) were used in the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be a compendium of all reference materials. This report may be used to understand some of the issues considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan, but should not be used as the sole reference for data or as confirmation of intended or desired policy direction. Final policy direction was subject to change based on additional input from the general public, stakeholders, and decision makers during regional outreach meetings, public review of the environmental impact report, and public adoption hearings.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3 Program Biological Resources Report
    APPENDIX 3 Program Biological Resources Report Program Biological Resources Report Optimum Basin Management Program Update March 15, 2020 Chino Basin Watermaster and Inland Empire Utilities Agency Jacobs, OBMPU Program Biological Resources Report Jacobs_ Program Biological Resources Report March 2020 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Chino Basin Watermaster and Inland Empire Utilities Agency Prepared By: Date: Lisa M. Patterson, Ecologist/Regulatory Specialist/QSP (909) 838-1333 Jacobs 55616 Pipes Canyon Road, Yucca Valley, CA 92284 Recommended for Approval by: Date: Sylvie Lee email: [email protected] Tel: (909) 993-1646 Inland Empire Utilities Agency 6075 Kimball Avenue Chino, CA 91708 Recommended for Approval by: Date: Peter Kavounas email: [email protected] Tel: (909) 484-3888 Chino Basin Watermaster 9641 San Bernardino Road Rancho Cuamonga, CA 91730 i OBMPU Program Biological Resources Report Jacobs_ Contents Chapter 1. Project Description .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Technical Report
    Biological Resources Technical Report Colton Community Soccer Park Project in Colton, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for City of Colton Community Services and Public Works Department 670 Colton Avenue Colton, California 92324 Contact: Deb Farrar Prepared by Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Steve Norton July 2019 Colton Soccer Park Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Physical Environmental Setting ........................................... 1 1.1.1 Regional Environmental Setting ................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Description and Background ..................................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Federal ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 State .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Regional .................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Survey Methods .............................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Literature Review .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]