DOCSLIB.ORG

8.0 REFERENCES CITED Adams, M.J, Pearl C.A, and Bury, R.B. 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL Pre-Application Document Devil Canyon Project Relicensing 8.0 REFERENCES CITED Adams, M.J, Pearl C.A, and Bury, R.B. 2003. Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecology Letters 6:1–9 Allen, M.F. and T. Tennant. 2000. Evaluation of critical habitat for the California red- legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii). UC Riverside: Center for Conservation Biology. Alvarez, J.A., D G. Cook, J. l. Yee, M. G. van Hattem, D.R. Fong, and R.N. Fisher. 2013. Comparative microhabitat characteristics at oviposition sites of the California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii). Herpetological Conservation and Biology 8:539−551. American Trails. 2015. http://www.americantrails.org/resources/info/National-Scenic- Trails.html. Accessed: 9/10/15. Aspen Environmental Group. 2006. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study, Horsethief Creek Bridge Mojave Siphon Maintenance Road Project. Prepared for DWR. January 2006. Submitted to FERC and filed on June 21, 2006. Aspen Environmental Group Arroyo and Hunt & Associates Biological Consulting. 2005. Arroyo Toad Survey and Habitat Evaluation along the Horsethief Creek and Check 66 Access Road for the Horsethief Creek Repairs Project. Prepared for DWR. October 2005. Atwater, Tanya and Helmut Ehrenspeck. 2000. The Incredible Cenozoic Geologic History of Southern California, National Association of Geoscience Teachers-Far Western Section for Spring Field Conference-April 14-16, 2000 by Department of Geosciences, California State University, Northridge. Backlin, A. R., C. J. Hitchcock, R. N. Fisher, M. L. Warburton, P. Trenham, S. A. Hathaway, and C. S. Brehme. 2003. Natural History and Recovery Analysis for Southern California Populations of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa), Annual Report. Prepared for CDFW (Contract # P0185110), Angeles National Forest, San Bernardino National Forest, Mount San Jacinto State Park, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, and BLM. Baracco, Allen. Assistant Fishery Biologist. 1975. CDFG. Memorandum to CDFG Region 5 Fisheries Management regarding investigations of trout losses from Silverwood Lake due to water export. March 1975. Barry, Robert G. 2012. Memorandum to David Panec, Chief Dam Safety Branch Division of Operations and Maintenance entitled Cedar Springs Dam, Fault Re- evaluation Report, Project Geology Report Number 57-11-25. DWR, Project Geology Section. November 30, 2012. Department of Water Resources Page 8-1 August 2016 FINAL Pre-Application Document Devil Canyon Project Relicensing Barry, Robert G. 2011. Memorandum to David Panec, Chief Dam Safety Branch Division of Operations and Maintenance regarding Silverwood Lake; Results of research and Shoreline Geologic Inspection, Report Number 57-11-26. DWR, Project Geology Section. November 8, 2011. Bean, L. J. and Smith, C.R. 1978. Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8. Robert. F. Heizer, Editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Begley, E. 2004. Trout Stocking Program, April 2002 through April 2004, Federal Energy Regulatory Project 2426. Department of Water Resources. Sacramento, CA. Berigan, William, R. J. Gutierrez and Douglas J. Tempel. Evaluating the Efficacy of Protected Activity Areas for the California Spotted Owl Using Long-Term Monitoring Data. Journal of Forestry. 10(6):299-303. Blackburn, Thomas C. and Lowell John Bean. 1978. Kitanemuk. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, pp. 564-569. Robert. F. Heizer, Editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. BLM. 2015. Special Status Plants under the jurisdiction of the Palm Springs Field Office as of April 30, 2015. Available online at: http://www.blm.gov/style/medialib/blm/ca/pdf/pa/botany.Par.76631.File.dat/Palm %20Springs%20concise%20for%202015.pdf Bolster, B.C., editor. 1998. Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California. Draft Final Report prepared by P.V. Brylski, P.W. Collins, E.D. Pierson, W.E. Rainey and T.E. Kucera. Report submitted to California Department of Fish and Wildlife - Wildlife Management Division, Nongame Bird and Mammal Conservation Program for Contract No.FG3146WM. Brewster, Brad. 2012. Cedar Springs Dam Historic Resources Evaluation Memo. Prepared for Department of Water Resources. Prepared by Environmental Science Associates, San Francisco, California. Brown, C. and R. Fisher. 2002. Survey results for the arroyo toad (Bufo californicus) in the San Bernardino National Forest, 2001; Final Report. USGS Western Ecological Research Center. Byrd, Brian F. and L. Mark Raab. 2007. Prehistory of the Southern Bight: Models for a New Millennium. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity. Edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp 215-227. CAL-EPA. 2014a. Area Designation Maps/State and National. Available online at: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm>. Accessed: on July 27, 2015. Last updated August 22, 2014 Department of Water Resources Page 8-2 August 2016 FINAL Pre-Application Document Devil Canyon Project Relicensing CAL-EPA. 2014b. Emissions by California Air Districts. Available online at: <http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/maps/statemap/dismap.htm>. Accessed: July 27, 2015. Last updated March 14, 2014. CAL FIRE. 2012. “About CAL FIRE”. http://calfire.ca.gov/about/about.php. Accessed: August 17. CalFlora. 2015. Information on wild California plants for conservation, education, and appreciation. Available online at: http://www.calfora.org. Accessed: August 2015. California Employment Development Department. 2015a. Monthly Labor Force Data for Counties, Annual Average 2014 –Revised. Report 400 C. California Employment Development Department. 2015b. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. San Bernardino County, Annual Average California Herps. 2015. A guide to the amphibians and reptiles of California. Available online at: http://www.californiaherps.com/ Accessed: November 2015. California RWQCB Lahontan Region. 2014. Clean Water Act Sections 305(b) and 303(d) Integrated report for the Lahontan Region. Public Review Draft April 2014. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/lahontan/water_issues/programs/tmdl/303d_305b /2012/docs/staffreport053014.pdf. California RWQCB Lahontan Region. 1995. Water quality control plan for the Lahontan Region, North and South Basins. Plan effective March 31, 1995, amended through August 16, 2011. California State Parks. 2009. Silverwood Lake State Recreation Area Nature Center Interpretive Project Plan. California State Parks. San Diego, CA. April 2009. California State Parks. 2006. Silverwood Lake State Recreation Area Brochure. Revised 2010. California SWRCB. 2015. MCLs, DLRs, and PHGs for Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. Last Update: September 23, 2015. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/MCLsandPH Gs.shtml California Watchable Wildlife. 2015. http://www.cawatchablewildlife.org Accessed: November 20, 2015 Cal-IPC. 2015a. California Invasive Plant Inventory Database and CalWeedMapper spatial data, downloaded November 20, 2015. Available online at: http://www.cal- ipc.org/ Department of Water Resources Page 8-3 August 2016 FINAL Pre-Application Document Devil Canyon Project Relicensing Cal-IPC. 2015b. Cal-WeedMapper Online Application. Available online at: < http://calweedmapper.cal-ipc.org/>. Accessed: October 5, 2015. Caltrans, 2015. The California Scenic Highway Program. http://www.dot.ca.gov/dist3/departments/mtce/scenic.htm. Copyright 2015. Accessed: October 7, 2015. Caltrans, 2013. Scenic Highway Routes: Caltrans Landscape Architecture Program. Eligible and Officially Designated Routes. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/cahisys.htm. Updated December 19, 2013. Accessed: October 7, 2015. CARB. 2015. AAQS. Available online at: <ttp://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf>. Accessed: May 2, 2016. Last updated October 1, 2013. Castillo, Edward D. 1978. The Impact of Euro-American Exploration and Settlement. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by R.F. Heizer, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Castleberry, D.T. and J.J. Cech, Jr. 1986. Physiological responses of a native and an introduced desert fish to environmental stressors. Ecology 67:912-918. Cataldo, Nicholas R. 1991. The Mohave Indian Trail. Odyssey 13(2):3-4. Published by the City of San Bernardino Pioneer and Historical Society. Cataldo, Nicholas R. 1986. Devil Canyon Toll Road. Odyssey 8(3):35-37, 44. Published by the City of San Bernardino Pioneer and Historical Society. CDFA. 2015. Encycloweedia: Data Sheets. Available online at: < http://www.cal- ipc.org/ip/management/ipcw/pages/detailreport.cfm@usernumber=45&surveynu mber=182.php>. Accessed: July 27, 2015. Last updated: February 27, 2015. CDFA. 2010. Pest Ratings of Noxious Weed Species and Noxious Weed Seed. January 2010. Available online at: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/ipc/weedinfo/winfo_pestrating_2010.pdf CDFG. 1999. A Supplemental Mitigation Plan for Fishery Restoration at Lake Silverwood, San Bernardino County. CDFG Eastern Sierra and Inland Deserts Region and Fisheries Programs Brach Staff. Long Beach, California. CDFG. 1968. California Aqueduct Fish and Wildlife Development Plan for Silverwood Lake. Water Projects Branch. Sacramento, CA. CDFW. 2015a. CNDDB. RareFind Version 5. Available online at: <nrmsecure.dfg.ca.gov/cnddb/view/query.aspx>. Accessed: July 31, 2015. Last updated July 7, 2015. CDFG, Biogeographic Data Branch. Sacramento, CA. Department of Water Resources Page 8-4 August 2016
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Flora of the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed, San Bernardino Mountains, California

    The Vascular Flora of the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed, San Bernardino Mountains, California

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281748553 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Article · January 2013 CITATIONS READS 0 28 6 authors, including: Naomi S. Fraga Thomas Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana B… Plymouth State Univ… 8 PUBLICATIONS 14 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Thomas Stoughton Retrieved on: 24 November 2016 Crossosoma 37(1&2), 2011 9 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Naomi S. Fraga, LeRoy Gross, Duncan Bell, Orlando Mistretta, Justin Wood1, and Tommy Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 North College Avenue Claremont, California 91711 1Aspen Environmental Group, 201 North First Avenue, Suite 102, Upland, California 91786 [email protected] All Photos by Naomi S. Fraga ABSTRACT: We present an annotated catalogue of the vascular flora of the upper Santa Ana River watershed, in the southern San Bernardino Mountains, in southern California. The catalogue is based on a floristic study, undertaken from 2008 to 2010. Approximately 65 team days were spent in the field and over 5,000 collections were made over the course of the study. The study area is ca. 155 km2 in area (40,000 ac) and ranges in elevation from 1402 m to 3033 m. The study area is botanically diverse with more than 750 taxa documented, including 56 taxa of conservation concern and 81 non-native taxa. Vegetation and habitat types in the area include chaparral, evergreen oak forest and woodland, riparian forest, coniferous forest, montane meadow, and pebble plain habitats.
  • Alpine Pedal Path Brochure

    Alpine Pedal Path Brochure

    This brochure lists common plant species found along the Big Bear Lake Pedal Path. Species occurrence varies across a rainfall gradient extending from Stanfield Cutoff (drier species) to the Big Bear Solar Observatory (more mesic species) To help locate plants, the path is divided into five sections on the map (A,B,C,D,&E). Please remain on the designated path to avoid damaging sensitive plant species. Please deposit any trash in waste receptacles at trailheads. For your safety, please watch out for bikes, runners, and strollers while looking for plants along the path For additional information please contact the Big Bear Discovery Center at (909)- 866-3437 Take pictures not flowers, PLEASE Compiled during the Spring of 2005 by: Scott Eliason (District Botanist) Kerry Myers (Botanist) Jason Bill (GIS Specialist) Alpine Pedal Path Plant Walk Plant Walk List Tree(T) Herb(H) Scientific Name Common Name Shrub(S) Section Native? Bloom Time Abies concolor white fir T A,B,C,D,E YES Spring /Summ. Abronia nana Coville's dwarf abronia H A YES June-Aug. Achillea millefolium yarrow H B YES March-July Achnatherum hymenoides Indian ricegrass H C YES Summer Amelanchier utahensis serviceberry S A,B,C,D,E YES April-May Anisocoma acaulis scalebud H C YES Summer Antennaria rosea pussy-toes H A,B YES June-Aug. Aquilegia formosa columbine H B YES June-Aug. Arabis pulchra beauty rockcress H A,B,C,D,E YES April-May Arceuthobium campylopodum western dwarf mistletoe H B,C,D,E YES Oct.-Dec. Arctostaphylos patula manzanita S B,C,D,E YES May-June Artemisia dracunculus tarragon H A,E YES Aug.-Oct.
  • Delhi Sands Flowerloving Fly Survey Report 2010

    Delhi Sands Flowerloving Fly Survey Report 2010

    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) Survey Report 2010 23 March 2011 Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Survey Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 SURVEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................2 METHODS………… ....................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING...........................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE SELECTION AND TRANSECT PLACEMENT ..................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS........................................................................................................................5 DATA ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................................6 RESULTS…….. ............................................................................................................................................6 DISCUSSION….. ........................................................................................................................................10
  • 805.921.0683 Cell: 805.415.9595 Em

    805.921.0683 Cell: 805.415.9595 Em

    July 11, 2018 Mr. Tal Shoshan, CEO c/o T-Rose Investments, LLC 3880 E. Ebony Ontario, CA 91761 SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, 2.76-acre Site, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Shoshan: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a ±2.76-acre site to support the federally-listed endangered Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis-DSFF). Introduction The subject 2.76-acre site is regionally located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). More specifically, the site is located north of 4th Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, west of Center Avenue, and south of Trademark Street; Township 1 South, Range 7 West, Section 14 on the “Guasti” USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Plate 2). Plate 3 provides an aerial photograph of the site. In order to meet the environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occurring sensitive biological resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant’s conformance to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. As such, this report is intended to provide biological information to the applicant and reviewing agencies in support of the environmental review process. Selected Species Overview The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) listed the DSFF as an endangered species on September 23, 1993. This species is only known to occur in association with Delhi sand deposits (FWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sites within a radius of about eight miles in the cities of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties.
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To

    November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To

    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
  • Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation

    Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation

    Appendix C Habitat Suitability Evaluation, Arborist Report, and Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation FONTANA FOOTHILLS COMMERCE CENTER DRAFT EIR Habitat Suitability Evaluation April 15, 2020 Chad Manista REDA Acquisitions, LLC 4450 MacArthur Blvd., Ste. 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 SUBJECT: Results of a Habitat Suitability Evaluation, ±33-acre Site, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California Dear Chad: This letter report presents findings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the suitability of a 33-acre site to support special-status biological resources in support of the environmental review process. Introduction The study area is regionally located in San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). Specifically, the project site is located in the City of Fontana (City), generally south of Santa Ana Avenue, east of Juniper Avenue, north of Jurupa Avenue, and west of Sierra Avenue. The site occurs on the “Fontana” USGS 7.5- minute topographic map (Plate 2). The site occurs on the "Fontana" 7.5-minute USGS Quadrangle Map, Township 1 South, Range 5 West, Section 30. Projects proposed in this area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensitive biological resources must demonstrate to reviewing agencies that potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources are adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended. Accordingly, results of this habitat suitability evaluation are intended to provide the applicant and resource agencies with preliminary biological information required for planning and permitting decisions concerning the proposed project. Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal or habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of certain sensitive biological resources cannot necessarily be made in this report.
  • Work in Progress VASCULAR PLANTS

    Work in Progress VASCULAR PLANTS

    3.C Biological Resources Table 3C-1 Church of the Woods Sensitive Plants VASCULAR PLANTS Flowering CNPS Occurrence Scientific Name Common Name Period Federal State List Preferred Habitat Distribution On-Site Acanthoscyphus Cushenbury June-Sept. FE NONE 1B.1 Limestone talus from 4,800 to Endemic to northern slopes NE parishii var. oxytheca 7,500 feet. of the San Bernardino goodmaniana Mountains. Arabis parishii Parish’s rock cress Apr.-May NONE NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement on dry slopes Bear Valley and Sugarloaf NE from 6,500 to 9,800 feet. Yellow Peak. pine forest, red fir forest. Arenaria ursina Big Bear Valley May-Aug. FT NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement on dry slopes Endemic to San Bernardino NE sandwort from 6,000 to 7,000 feet. Pinyon Mountains, known only and Juniper woodland. from Big Bear and Baldwin Lakes. Astragalus Big Bear Valley May-July NONE NONE 1B.2 Pebble pavement from 6,000 to Known from the central San NE leucolobus woolly pod 8,000 feet. Upper montane Gabriel Mountains, San coniferous forest. Pinyon and Bernardino and Santa Rosa juniper woodland and sagebrush Mountains. scrub. Berberis nevinii Nevin’s barberry Mar.-Apr. FE SE 1B.1 Sandy and gravelly places below Known from the hills south NE 2,000 feet. Coastal sage scrub and of Loma Linda in San chaparral. Bernardino County and in the area around Vail Lake in Riverside County. Calochortus palmeri Palmer’s mariposa May-July NONE NONE 1B.2 Meadows and moist places from Known from the north San NE var. palmeri lily 3,500 to 6,500 feet.
  • 2016-2021 Long Range Objectives

    2016-2021 Long Range Objectives

    © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL © 2010-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL RIVERSIDE-CORONA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT RESOURCECONSERVATION RIVERSIDE-CORONA 2016-2021 Objectives Long Range © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO © 2016-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY ARLEE MONTALVO Plan willbedevelopedforeachyearbasedonthislongtermactionplan. Annual Work An within willbeusedtoplanfutureprojects,programming,anddistrictoperations. The objectivesprovided Riverside-Corona ResourceConservationDistrict(RCRCD)(District). This documentisanassessmentoftheresourcemanagementandoutreachneeds 2016-2021 Objectives Long Range ©© 2014-RIVERSIDE-CORONA RCD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHOTO BY KERWIN RUSSELL Riverside-Corona ResourceConservationDistrict 2 3 Long Range Objectives 2016-2021 Contents About the RCRCD 5 Programs 9 Assist Land Users with Resource Planning and Management 10 Conserve Habitat Land and Species 11 Foster Stewardship through Education, Citizen Science and Outreach 20 Goals and Objectives 28 GOAL 1—Assist Land Users with Resource Planning and Management 29 GOAL 2—Conserve Habitat Land and Species 31 GOAL 3—Foster Stewardship through Education, Citizen Science, and Outreach 34 GOAL 4—Help Create Sustainable Communities and Partnerships 39 GOAL 5—Conduct Programs Efficiently 41 Land Uses 45 Native Habitats 45 Urban and Surburban Areas 46 Agriculture
  • Introduction to Plant Identification

    Introduction to Plant Identification

    Plant Science Training Program www.cnps.org/workshops Introduction to Plant Identification 15 Common Plant Families of Southern California Dates: June 5-7, 2018 (Tuesday - Thursday) Location: San Bernardino Mountains - Big Bear area, CA Instructors: Sandy Namoff, Claremont Colleges Laboratory Coordinator; & Nick Jensen, CNPS Southern California Conservation Analyst Registration: $395 CNPS Members / $415 Non-Members All Photos © Nick Jensen Target Audience: This workshop will be taught at a beginner level and is open to anyone interested in learning about or improving their knowledge of plant terminology and the characteristics of common plant families, and becoming competent at plant keying using the Jepson Manual and online resources. Those just entering the world of plant identification will benefit from learning the diagnostic characteristics of the most important plant families in CA. Those with prior plant identification experience will be able to refresh their skills and increase their proficiency with more difficult groups such as the Poaceae (grasses) and Asteraceae (sunflowers). Emphasis will be placed on common groups of plants in Southern CA; however, information learned in this class will be readily applicable throughout CA and the world. Description: This is a 3-day introductory workshop. We will begin by teaching basic plant morphology with a focus on the structures necessary for plant ID. Participants will learn the specialized terminology necessary to identify plants in 15 common CA plant families. These families contain more than 5000 taxa, which account for more than 70% of the plant diversity in CA. Learning the characteristics of these plant families will reduce the amount of time required to key many plants to genus and species.
  • Explorations in Ethnobiology: the Legacy of Amadeo Rea

    Explorations in Ethnobiology: the Legacy of Amadeo Rea

    Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea Edited by Marsha Quinlan and Dana Lepofsky Copyright 2013 ISBN-10: 0988733013 ISBN-13: 978-0-9887330-1-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012956081 Society of Ethnobiology Department of Geography University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle #305279 Denton, TX 76203-5017 Cover photo: Amadeo Rea discussing bird taxonomy with Mountain Pima Griselda Coronado Galaviz of El Encinal, Sonora, Mexico, July 2001. Photograph by Dr. Robert L. Nagell, used with permission. Contents Preface to Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea . i Dana Lepofsky and Marsha Quinlan 1 . Diversity and its Destruction: Comments on the Chapters . .1 Amadeo M. Rea 2 . Amadeo M . Rea and Ethnobiology in Arizona: Biography of Influences and Early Contributions of a Pioneering Ethnobiologist . .11 R. Roy Johnson and Kenneth J. Kingsley 3 . Ten Principles of Ethnobiology: An Interview with Amadeo Rea . .44 Dana Lepofsky and Kevin Feeney 4 . What Shapes Cognition? Traditional Sciences and Modern International Science . .60 E.N. Anderson 5 . Pre-Columbian Agaves: Living Plants Linking an Ancient Past in Arizona . .101 Wendy C. Hodgson 6 . The Paleobiolinguistics of Domesticated Squash (Cucurbita spp .) . .132 Cecil H. Brown, Eike Luedeling, Søren Wichmann, and Patience Epps 7 . The Wild, the Domesticated, and the Coyote-Tainted: The Trickster and the Tricked in Hunter-Gatherer versus Farmer Folklore . .162 Gary Paul Nabhan 8 . “Dog” as Life-Form . .178 Eugene S. Hunn 9 . The Kasaga’yu: An Ethno-Ornithology of the Cattail-Eater Northern Paiute People of Western Nevada .
  • Long-Term Management Plan for Bald Eagle and Rare Plant Habitat

    Long-Term Management Plan for Bald Eagle and Rare Plant Habitat

    LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BALD EAGLE AND RARE PLANT HABITAT MOON CAMP RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: RCK Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 706 Big Bear City, California 92314 Contact: Michael Perry Prepared By: ELMT Consulting 2201 N. Grand Avenue #10098 Santa Ana, California 92711 Contact: Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. and Timothy Krantz Environmental Consulting 39611 Oak Glen Road Yucaipa, California 92399 Contact: Timothy Krantz, Ph.D. August 2019 Executive Summary This Long-Term Management Plan (LTMP) has been prepared to provide permanent protection and long- term management of habitat for American bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and rare plant species on the Moon Camp residential subdivision (henceforth, “the Project”), situated near the unincorporated town of Fawnskin in Big Bear Valley, San Bernardino County, California. Bald eagle use of the Moon Camp property is limited to occasional perching in trees along the lakeshore and foraging for fish and waterfowl over Big Bear Lake. Potential impacts of the Moon Camp residential development are therefore limited to the near-shore perch trees and foraging habitat along the lake. Rare plant habitat on the Project site consists of ashy-gray Indian paintbrush (Castilleja cinerea), a federally Threatened species, and several other rare and locally restricted species. The rare plant habitat is primarily confined to the western portion of the Project area within the area designated as Open Space Letter Lots A and H. This LTMP describes preservation measures, management activities and the implementation of a long-term monitoring program to improve and maintain optimal bald eagle and rare plant habitat onsite in perpetuity.
  • Cultural Resources Survey of the Phase 1 Area and Associated Water Tank/Access Road Route for the Tapestry Project, Hesperia, San Bernardino County, California

    Cultural Resources Survey of the Phase 1 Area and Associated Water Tank/Access Road Route for the Tapestry Project, Hesperia, San Bernardino County, California

    CONFIDENTIAL CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE PHASE 1 AREA AND ASSOCIATED WATER TANK/ACCESS ROAD ROUTE FOR THE TAPESTRY PROJECT, HESPERIA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS Hesperia, CA 7.5' Quadrangle USGS Silverwood Lake, CA 7.5' Quadrangle Submitted to HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91942 Prepared by Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 133 N. San Gabriel Blvd, Suite 201 Pasadena, California 91107 March 2014 CONFIDENTIAL CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE PHASE 1 AREA AND ASSOCIATED WATER TANK/ACCESS ROAD ROUTE FOR THE TAPESTRY PROJECT, HESPERIA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS Hesperia, CA 7.5' Quadrangle USGS Silverwood Lake, CA 7.5' Quadrangle Prepared for: Andrea Bitterling HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91942 Prepared by: Tiffany Clark, Ph.D., RPA, and Dennis McDougall Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 133 N. San Gabriel Blvd, Suite 201 Pasadena, California 91107 March 2014 National Archaeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Literature Search, Intensive Pedestrian Survey and Evaluation Cultural Resources Recorded: CA-SBR-17017 (P-36-026999) through CA-SBR-17097H (P-36-027082) Sites Revisited and/or Updated: CA-SBR-2297H (P-36-002297), CA-SBR-2298 (P-36-002298), CA-SBR-5342 (P- 36-005342), CA-SBR-5366H (P-36-005366), CA-SBR-12646H (P-36-013753), CA-SBR-12650H (P-36-013757); CA-SBR-12651 (P-36-013762), CA-SBR-12656H (P-36-013767), CA-SBR-12657 (P-36-013768); CA-SBR-12658 (P-36-013769), CA-SBR-12661H (P-36-013772), and CA-SBR-12662 (P-36-013773)