A History in 100 Stories Professor Alistair Thomson Interview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History in 100 Stories Professor Alistair Thomson Interview World War 1: A History in 100 Stories MONASH UNIVERSITY Professor Alistair Thomson interview: Supplementary reading list These readings will enhance your understanding of Al Thomson’s discussion with Laura James and Rebecca Wheatley. Beaumont, Joan. ‘The Politics of a Divided Society’. Australia’s War, 1914-18, ed. Joan Beaumont. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1995. Broken Nation: Australians in the Great War. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 2013. Blackmore, Kate. The Dark Pocket of Time: War, Medicine and the Australian State, 1914-1935. Lythrum Press, Adelaide, 2008. Bollard, Robert. ‘“The Active Chorus”: The Great Strike of 1917 in Victoria’. Labour History 90, May 2006, pp. 77-94. In the Shadow of Gallipoli: The Hidden History of Australia in World War I. Sydney: New South Publishing, 2013. Bongiorno, F. Rae Frances and Bruce Scates (eds.) Labour and the Great War: The Australian Working Class and the Making of Anzac, A Special Issue of Labour History 106, May 2014. Bongiorno, F. and P. Deery. ‘Labour, Loyalty and Peace: Two Anzac Controversies of the 1920s’. Labour History: A Journal of Labour and Social History 106, May 2014, pp. 205-28. Coward, Dan. ‘Crime and Punishment: The Great Strike in New South Wales, August to October 1917’. Strikes: Studies in Twentieth Century Australian Social History, eds. John Iremonger, John Merritt and Graemem Osborne. Sydney: Angus & Robertson, 19173, pp. 51-80. Crotty, Martin & Larsson, Marina (eds). Anzac Legacies: Australians and the Aftermath of War. Australian Scholarly Publishing, North Melbourne, 2010. Curren, James and Stuart Ward. The Unknown Nation: Australia after Empire. Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 1975. Damousi, Joy. ‘Marching to Different Drums: Women’s Mobilizations 1914-39’. Gender Relations in Australia: Domination and Negotiation, eds. Kay Saunders and Raymond Evans. Sydney: Harcourt Brace, 1992, pp. 350-75. © Monash University FutureLearn 1 Deery, Phillip and Frank Bongiorno. ‘Labour, Loyalty and Peace: Two Anzac Controversies of the 1920s’. Labour and the Great War: The Australian Working Class and the Making of Anzac, eds. Frank Bongiorno, Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates. Sydney: Australian Society for the Study of Labour History, 2014, pp. 205-28. Dyrenfurth, Nick. Heroes and Villains: The Rise and Fall of the Early Australian Labor Party. Sydney: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2011, pp. 158-230. Fitzhardinge, L.F. The Little Digger 1914-1952. Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1979. Gregson, Sarah. ‘Defending Internationalism in Interwar Broken Hill.’ Labor History 80, May 2001, pp. 21-40. Inglis, K.S. ‘Conscription in Peace and War, 1911-1945’. Conscription in Australia, eds. Roy Forward and Bob Reece. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1968, pp. 22-65. Lake, Marilyn. A Divided Society: Tasmania During World War I. Carlton: Melbourne University Press, 1975. Lake, Marilyn. The Limits of Hope: Soldier Settlement in Victoria 1915–38. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1987. Larsson, Marina. Shattered Anzacs: Living with the Scars of War. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2009. Roper, Michael. The Secret Battle: Emotional Survival in the Great War. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009. Scates, Bruce. A Place to Remember: A History of the Shrine of Remembrance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Scates, Bruce and Melanie Oppenheimer. ‘“I intend to get justice”: The Moral Economy of Soldier Settlement’ in Labour and the Great War: The Australian Working Class and the Making of Anzac, Frank Bongiorno, Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates eds. Sydney: Australian Society for the Study of Labour History, 2014, Pp. 229-53. Taksa, Lucy. ‘“Defence not Defiance”: Social Protest and the NSW General Strike of 1917’. Labour History 60, May 1991, pp. 16-33. Thomson, Alistair. Anzac Memories: Living with the Legend. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing, 2013. Thomson, Alistair. ‘Anzac Memories Revisited: Trauma, Memory and Oral History’. Oral History Review, forthcoming 2015. Turner, Ian. Industrial Labour and Politics: The Dynamics of the Labour Movement in Eastern Australia, 1920-1921. Canberra: Australian National University and Press, 1965. FutureLearn 2 .
Recommended publications
  • Beyond Gallipoli
    Beyond Gallipoli New Perspectives on Anzac Edited by Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates © Copyright 2016 Copyright of this collection in its entirety is held by Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates. Copyright of the individual chapters is held by the respective chapter authors. All rights reserved. Apart from any uses permitted by Australia’s Copyright Act 1968, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the copyright owners. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher. Monash University Publishing Matheson Library and Information Services Building 40 Exhibition Walk Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia www.publishing.monash.edu Monash University Publishing brings to the world publications which advance the best traditions of humane and enlightened thought. Monash University Publishing titles pass through a rigorous process of independent peer review. www.publishing.monash.edu/books/bg-9781925495102.html Series: Australian History Series Editor / Board: Sean Scalmer Design: Les Thomas Front cover image: Exhibition Giant, Gallipoli: The Scale of Our War, Private Colin Airlie Warden (1890–1915), Auckland Infantry Battalion. Photograph by Michael Hall. Courtesy of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Back cover image: ‘Peace’ ferry, with warship in the background, Anzac Cove, 2015. Photo by Bruce Scates.. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Title: Beyond Gallipoli : new perspectives on Anzac / edited by Raelene Frances, Bruce Scates. ISBN: 9781925495102 (paperback) Subjects: World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--Australia. World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--New Zealand. World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--Turkey. War and society. Other Creators/Contributors: Frances, Raelene, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Militarisation of Australian History and Culture Thesis: the Case of Anzac Battlefield Tourism
    A Critique of the Militarisation of Australian History and Culture Thesis: The Case of Anzac Battlefield Tourism Jim McKay, Centre for Critical and Cultural Studies, University of Queensland This special issue on travel from Australia through a multidisciplinary lens is particularly apposite to the increasing popularity of Anzac battlefield tourism. Consider, for instance, the Dawn Service at Gallipoli in 2015, which will be the highlight of the commemoration of the Anzac Centenary between 2014 and 2018 (Anzac Centenary 2012). Australian battlefield tourism companies are already fully booked for this event, which is forecast to be ‘the largest peacetime gathering of Australians outside of Australia’ (Kelly 2011). Some academics have argued that rising participation in Anzac battlefield tours is symptomatic of a systemic and unrelenting militarisation of Australian history and culture. Historians Marilyn Lake, Mark McKenna and Henry Reynolds are arguably the most prominent proponents of this line of reasoning. According to McKenna: It seems impossible to deny the broader militarisation of our history and culture: the surfeit of jingoistic military histories, the increasing tendency for military displays before football grand finals, the extension of the term Anzac to encompass firefighters and sporting champions, the professionally stage-managed event of the dawn service at Anzac Cove, the burgeoning popularity of battlefield tourism (particularly Gallipoli and the Kokoda Track), the ubiquitous newspaper supplements extolling the virtues of soldiers past and present, and the tendency of the media and both main political parties to view the death of the last World War I veterans as significant national moments. (2007) In the opening passage of their book, What’s Wrong With Anzac? The Militarisation of Australian History (henceforth, WWWA), to which McKenna contributed a chapter, Lake and Reynolds also avowed that militarisation was a pervasive and inexorable PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The First Casualty When War Comes Is Truth'
    ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’ 54 ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’: Neglected Atrocity in First World War Australian Memory Emily Gallagher Fourth Year Undergraduate, University of Notre Dame ‘The first casualty when war comes is truth’1 Hiram W. Johnson It is assumed, at least in the West, that the glorification of war is a thing of the past. Even more widely accepted is the perception that modern veneration honours the dead without bias or prejudice. In fact, the rich tapestry of the ANZAC legend glorifies war and readily rejects its associated horrors, projecting constructions of heroism and virtue onto national memory. Exploring the popular perception that inhumane war practices are inherently non-Western, this paper assesses the persisting silence on the grotesque experiences of soldiers in war. An examination of the nature and use of chemical warfare in World War One (WWI) and historiographical analysis of Australian scholarship on WWI will form the foundation of case evidence. Additionally, the psychological analysis of ‘joyful killing’ will be discussed as a potential framework through which modern commemoration can expose past embellishments. Bruce Scates’ Return to Gallipoli considers death and the ‘narrowed’ nature of ANZAC war commemoration. He argues that commemorative services perform a conservative political purpose, 1 Attributed to Senator Hiram Johnson in 1917, this quote originates from Samuel Johnson in 1758. See Suzy Platt (ed.), Respectfully Quoted: a Dictionary of Quotations Requested from the Congressional Research service(Washington: Library of Congress, 1989), 360. 55 history in the making vol. 4 no. 1 where personal mourning is displaced with sentiments of patriotism and sacrifice.2 Pronouncing WWI the ‘great imaginative event’ of the century, Peter Hoffenberg argues that Australians have sought to comprehend the catastrophe of war through references to landscape.3 Certainly, the WWI cemeteries on the Western Front strongly support this venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Traces of War Program
    Narratives of War Research Group 2013 Symposium Traces of War Program 20 – 22 November 2013, Amy Wheaton Building, Magill Campus, University of South Australia Free entry - Light refreshments provided The title for the Narratives of War Symposium takes its theme from the way artefacts, diaries, media, art, music, memorabilia — letters, objects, the trappings of previous existence — indeed all manner of things, might be reflections and evidence of the traces left by war and conflict, and any aftermath and perhaps ensuing peace. The NOW Biennial Symposium is also open to the community and aims to offer interested community groups the chance to participate in current research and writing by scholars and researchers who will offer a broad range of papers and presentations. GUEST SPEAKERS Professor Peter Stanley Professor Peter Stanley is Research Professor at the University of New South Wales, Canberra’s Australian Centre for the Study of Armed Conflict and Society and former head of the Research Centre at the National Museum of Australia and former Principal Historian at the Australian War Memorial. Peter is one of Australia's most active military-social historians. He has published 25 books, mainly in the field of Australian military history (such as Tarakan: an Australian Tragedy or Quinn's Post, Anzac, Gallipoli or Invading Australia), but also in medical history (For Fear of Pain: British Surgery 1790-1850), British India (White Mutiny: British Military Culture in India 1825-75), British military history (Commando to Colditz) and bushfires (Black Saturday at Steels Creek). Professor Bruce Scates Professor Bruce Scates is a graduate of Monash University and the University of Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Day Media Style Guide
    2013 Anzac Day Media Style Guide Anzac Day Media Style Guide 2013 Contents (click on headings below to navigate the guide) About this Guide ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Further acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 5 Your feedback is welcome ...................................................................................................................... 5 Getting Started ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Anzac/ANZAC ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Anzac Day or ANZAC Day? .................................................................................................................. 7 Background: The Gallipoli Landings on 25 April 1915 ............................................................................ 8 Key Dates of the Gallipoli Campaign ....................................................................................................... 9 Gallipoli, Gallipoli and Gelibolu ......................................................................................................... 10 John Simpson Kirkpatrick (1892-1915) ............................................................................................. 10
    [Show full text]
  • LE10 1728 Skidmore Report 2013.Pdf
    Academic leadership for succession: research and implementation across the arts, social sciences and humanities in Australia FINAL REPORT 2013 Lead institution University of Canberra Partner institution The Australasian Council of Deans of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (DASSH) Project Leaders and team members Professor Pal Alhuwalia Professor Monique Skidmore Professor Toni Makkai Ms Liz Allen Ms Tempe Archer Additional assistance provided by Ms Sharon Hickox (ANU) and Ms Zohra Akseer Report authors Ms Liz Allen Ms Tempe Archer Professor Toni Makkai Support for the production of this report has been provided by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and where otherwise noted, all material presented in this document is provided under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/). The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode). Requests and inquiries concerning these rights should be addressed to: Office for Learning and Teaching Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education GPO Box 9880, Location code N255EL10 Sydney NSW 2001 [email protected] 2013 978-1-921916-63-2 [PRINT] 978-1-921916-64-9 [ONLINE] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to acknowledge the invaluable contributions made by the leaders participating in this study from the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (ASSH) sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting 2019 AGENDA
    Annual General Meeting 2019 AGENDA 1.00PM Thursday 26 September 2019 Tyree Room, John Niland Scientia Building, UNSW, Sydney 1. Welcome Chair, Professor Mandy Thomas 2 mins 2. Confirmation of Circulation of list of member institutions present and their nominated 2 mins members voting representative attending MOTION: THAT the voting representatives be recognised 3. Apologies Secretary, Professor Catharine Coleborne will advise of notified apologies. 2 mins The Chair calls for further apologies from the floor. 4. Minutes of 2018 Secretary, Professor Catharine Coleborne 2 mins AGM MOTION: THAT the minutes of the previous meeting be accepted as a true and accurate record 5. Business arising Not listed elsewhere 2 mins from the minutes 6. Election Outcomes The Secretary will announce the outcomes 5 mins 7. President’s Report Professor Mandy Thomas 5 mins MOTION: THAT the President’s report be accepted 8. Secretary’s Report Professor Catharine Coleborne 10 mins MOTION: THAT the Secretary’s report be accepted 9. Treasurer’s Report Professor Theo Farrell 10 mins Statement of Accounts & Auditor’s report MOTION: THAT the audited accounts for financial year 2018-19 and the Treasurer’s report be accepted 10. New Zealand Professor Allison Kirkman 5 mins Member’s Report MOTION: THAT the New Zealand member’s report be accepted 11 Associate Deans Professor Jennie Shaw 5 mins Network Liaison’s MOTION: THAT the Associate Deans Network Liaison’s report be accepted Report 12. Mapping HASS Professor Catharine Coleborne 5 mins Degrees – Interim Report 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Journey Resource Guide
    Australian Journey The Story of a Nation in 12 Objects Resources for the Journey Texts to Read | Websites to Visit Podcasts to listen to | Film and Literature Primary Sources |Defining Moments This booklet is produced by the Australian National University as a free educational resource. We gratefully acknowledge our collaboration with Monash University, the National Museum of Australia and all the cultural institutions featured in this project. Join us on an Australian Journey Australian Journey is designed for anyone, anywhere interested in Australia. Exploring the themes of Land, People, and Nation, it offers a road map to our country’s Past, Present, and Future. Australian Journey will take you the length and breadth of the continent, and across almost four billion years of history, in 12 short and engaging episodes. And every episode uses objects to reveal the stories of a nation. What do these pieces of the past tell us about their time, their purpose and their maker? Some of the objects we have chosen are famous, iconic or familiar; others obscure, even quirky. But all our objects tell a story and all find a place in the National Museum of Australia. Australian Journey is presented by Professor Bruce Scates and Dr Susan Carland. Resources for the Journey This booklet recommends a range of resources to complement each episode of Australian Journey. School teachers, international university students and the general public can use this guide to find texts, websites, podcasts, films, and literature to augment teaching and learning about the Australian nation. A collection of written, audio, internet and visual sources, this booklet will enable you to extend your knowledge of Australian history and engage further in the historical debates around the objects featured in Australian Journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary (Australia)
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 11 May 2021 Centenary (Australia) By Bruce Scates From 2010-2020, Australia fielded the longest, most expensive, and arguably most complex Great War centenary of any combatant nation. It involved unprecedented investment from the state, but was also driven by popular initiatives. “Bottom up” commemoration involved actual people taking on the work of remembrance, shaping and reshaping its complex, and much contested character. The form that labour took, in locations as diverse as museums and battlefields, performative theatre and critical history, is the subject of this article. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Historical Background 3 Orchestrating Anzac: Government Infrastructure 4 History Wars 5 Government Sanctioned Remembrance: The Dispersal of Centenary Funding 6 Commemorating from the Bottom Up 7 Conclusion Notes Selected Bibliography Citation Introduction At the beginning of 2014, James Brown warned of the drift ofA ustralia’s First World War commemorative program. “Anzac”, the former army officer claimed, had become the country’s “national obsession”. Whilst the rest of the world pondered the cost of a war that had torn Europe apart, Australians claimed a bungled battle on Gallipoli signalled the “birth of a nation”. While historians gauged the dimensions of a truly global conflict, Australians exaggerated their comparatively minor part in it. The nomenclature of 2014-2018 is telling. Elsewhere it marks the centenary of the First World War; in Australia it is styled “the Anzac Centenary”. The centenary, Brown concluded, would prove “a discordant, lengthy and exorbitant four year festival of the dead.”[1] There is much to be said for that analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Martial Madonna: the Army Nurse's Commemoration in Stained
    Australia’s Martial Madonna: the army nurse’s commemoration in stained glass windows (1919-1951) Susan Elizabeth Mary Kellett, RN Bachelor of Nursing (Honours), Graduate Diploma of Nursing (Perioperative) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of History and Philosophical Enquiry Abstract This thesis examines the portrayal of the army nurse in commemorative stained glass windows commissioned between 1919 and 1951. In doing so, it contests the prevailing understanding of war memorialisation in Australia by examining the agency of Australia’s churches and their members – whether clergy or parishioner – in the years following World Wars I and II. Iconography privileging the nurse was omitted from most civic war memorials following World War I when many communities used the idealised form of an infantryman to assuage their collective grief and recognise the service of returned menfolk to King and Country. Australia’s religious spaces were also deployed as commemorative spaces and the site of the nurse’s remembrance as the more democratic processes of parishes and dioceses that lost a member of the nursing services gave sanctuary to her memory, alongside a range of other service personnel, in their windows. The nurse’s depiction in stained glass was influenced by architectural relationships and socio- political dynamics occurring in the period following World War I. This thesis argues that her portrayal was also nuanced by those who created these lights. Politically, whether patron or artist, those personally involved in the prosecution of war generally facilitated equality in remembrance while citizens who had not frequently exploited memory for individual or financial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Goethe University Frankfurt Presents the 2Nd Goethe/Monash Academic Exchange Event National Celebrations and Cultural Memory In
    Goethe University Frankfurt presents the 2nd Goethe/Monash Academic Exchange Event 12 February 2014, 18.30h, IG Building Room 311, Westend Campus, Goethe University Frankfurt National Celebrations and Cultural Memory in Multicultural Societies The significance of national memorial holidays such as Australia Day or ANZAC Day Prof Rae Frances and Prof Bruce Scates from Monash University Melbourne together with Prof Astrid Erll and Prof Frank Schulze-Engler from Goethe University Frankfurt will discuss how modern societies deal with contested events of their national histories. How does perception change over time and which ideological messages are transmitted today? Who is addressed, who is included, and who is not? Australia Day and ANZAC Day serve as examples, celebrating events that some Australians seem to proudly perceive as the origin of modern Australia, while other Australians predominantly see them as the beginning of European invasion of the continent, suppression, and suffering, or as a national myth that excludes indigenous people as well as later generations of migrants. Many other Australians, often with a more recent history of migration (e.g. from continental Europe or Asia), might not ascribe much relevance at all to either memorial day and simply enjoy the public holiday. It is the dynamics of collective memory, increased amongst others by modern media, that shape cultural identities, both on an individual as well as national level. While politics might draw on such events in order to create a national identity – and again the question to be discussed here is: who is addressed, who is included, and who is not? – there is also a more subliminal level of negotiation and perception within society.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorialising Gallipoli: Manufacturing Memory at Anzac
    Memorialising Gallipoli: Manufacturing Memory at Anzac BRUCE SCATES arah’s Irwin’s son George went missing at Gallipoli in August S 1915. Last seen plunging into the Turkish trenches at Lone Pine, his body – like so many others – was never recovered from the carnage. The testimony of the men who survived offered little comfort to Sarah or her family; memory, like the battle itself, had a merciless quality. George himself died many times in the course of a single Red Cross inquiry. He was shot, bayoneted or, in that sparse but eloquent soldier imagery, ‘knocked over’, as he climbed the parapet. Long before the Gallipoli campaign was over its memory was fractured, disputed and open to contestation: I have interviewed so many boys who were with mine in the enemy trench and were blown up that I have... come to think that he might have been in one of these explosions, and been carried to some hospital suffering Public History Review No 15 (2008): 47–59 © UTSePress and the author Public History Review | Scates from loss of memory... [I’ve been] told... there were a number of cases like this. So Sarah Irwin continues to ‘hope,’ ‘pray’ and imagine until the very end of the war, as indeed did so many others like her: ‘I have never been able to think of him as dead. I feel he is still living somewhere. I write regularly to Turkey, [and] I will keep on trusting and hoping, until this dreadful war is over’.1 Twelve years after his death, Private Irwin’s parents finally make their way to Gallipoli.
    [Show full text]