DOCSLIB.ORG

Traces of War Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traces of War Program Narratives of War Research Group 2013 Symposium Traces of War Program 20 – 22 November 2013, Amy Wheaton Building, Magill Campus, University of South Australia Free entry - Light refreshments provided The title for the Narratives of War Symposium takes its theme from the way artefacts, diaries, media, art, music, memorabilia — letters, objects, the trappings of previous existence — indeed all manner of things, might be reflections and evidence of the traces left by war and conflict, and any aftermath and perhaps ensuing peace. The NOW Biennial Symposium is also open to the community and aims to offer interested community groups the chance to participate in current research and writing by scholars and researchers who will offer a broad range of papers and presentations. GUEST SPEAKERS Professor Peter Stanley Professor Peter Stanley is Research Professor at the University of New South Wales, Canberra’s Australian Centre for the Study of Armed Conflict and Society and former head of the Research Centre at the National Museum of Australia and former Principal Historian at the Australian War Memorial. Peter is one of Australia's most active military-social historians. He has published 25 books, mainly in the field of Australian military history (such as Tarakan: an Australian Tragedy or Quinn's Post, Anzac, Gallipoli or Invading Australia), but also in medical history (For Fear of Pain: British Surgery 1790-1850), British India (White Mutiny: British Military Culture in India 1825-75), British military history (Commando to Colditz) and bushfires (Black Saturday at Steels Creek). Professor Bruce Scates Professor Bruce Scates is a graduate of Monash University and the University of Melbourne. His many publications include Return to Gallipoli, A New Australia, the Cambridge History of the Shrine of Remembrance and the recently republished Women and the Great War (co authored with Raelene Frances). The last of these won the coveted NSW Premier’s History Award. Professor Scates has also written a novel, On Dangerous Ground, retracing CEW Bean’s steps across Gallipoli and his most recent project is a study of pilgrimages to the memory sites of World War Two. Professor Scates chaired the Military and Cultural History Panel advising the Anzac Centenary Board, he was a member of an expert panel convened to recover the bodies of men missing from Fromelles and has led several historical tours of the battlefields, including the Premier of Victoria's 'Spirit of Anzac' Tour and Monash University’s Annual Study Tour of Gallipoli. Professor Scates leads Australian Research Council funded projects on soldier settlement, World War II pilgrimage and heads an international team exploring the history of Anzac Day. Professor Matthew Ricketson - Dart Centre Asia Pacific Dart Centre Asia Pacific (DART) is a regional hub for media and trauma professionals and students who believe that effective reporting on violence matters. With permanent offices in Melbourne, Australia and training programs and other activities throughout the Asia Pacific, DCAP works to promote discussion, develop training, and exchange specialist knowledge on the most challenging of media issues. Matthew Ricketson is a journalist and academic. In 2009 he took up a position as the inaugural professor of journalism at the University of Canberra after being Media and Communications Editor at The Age from mid-2006 to early 2009. Before that he ran the journalism program at RMIT for 11 years. He is the author of a biography of Australian author Paul Jennings, a textbook about journalism and the editor of a collection of profiles. His PhD was awarded in 2010. Sponsored by: Wednesday, 20 November 2013 Room H2-08 1:00pm – 2:30pm Writing for Publication Workshop: Starting - and finishing - a thesis Professor Peter Stanley Beginning, developing, researching, sustaining and finishing a thesis presents many challenges and demands many qualities if you are to see it through. Prof Peter Stanley, who has supervised and examined many post-graduate theses, presents a workshop in which he will outline strategies that are – and are not – productive, useful or successful. The workshop will include a number of exercises to help candidates produce the best thesis they can, and will discuss ways of re-shaping academic theses for publication. Downstairs Foyer 2:30pm – 3:00pm Afternoon Break (Tea and Coffee provided) Room H2-08 3:00pm – 4:00pm Reporting the Unseen Wounds of War - Panel Discussion Chair: Dr Sharon Mascall-Dare Brigadier Tim Hanna, AM, Retd (Returned Services League (SA)) Matthew Ricketson, Director of Dart Asia-Pacific Gail MacDonnell, Australian Families of the Military Research Foundation Associate Professor Susan Neuhaus, University of Adelaide As Australia approaches the Anzac Centenary, how should or shouldn't the media talk about trauma? After the Great War, one manifestation of trauma was 'shellshock'; today there is increasing awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress among veterans of Australia's war and peacekeeping operations both past and present. The panel discussion will present views from the serving and ex-service community, the media and academia. Importantly, it will also include the latest research from the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma, the global leader in providing practical advice to the media regarding the ethical reporting of conflict, violence and trauma. 4:00pm – 5:30pm Psychological Trauma and War Reporting Masterclass Presented by Dart Asia-Pacific, facilitated by Professor Kerry Green and Dr Sharon Mascall-Dare The Masterclass is open to journalists and media professionals at all stages of their careers. Mid-career journalists will be offered practical advice regarding the ethical reporting of trauma - the class will include content on how to protect yourself, your colleagues and your interviewees when dealing with traumatic content. Journalism students will be given advice on how to build support networks and integrate ethical practices into their assignments. The class will be interactive and practically-focussed, presenting the latest advice and guidance from Dart Asia-Pacific, supported by current reporting scenarios. Downstairs Foyer 5:30pm – 6:30pm Drinks and Nibbles Thursday, 21 November 2013 Room H1-44 8:30am – 9:00am Registrations Open/Tea and Coffee 9:00am – 9:30am Welcome by Head of School 9.30am – 11:00am Panel Session 1: The Politics of War and Violence ‘They’re not telling us’: Suppression of information about the Sandakan Richard Wallace Braithwaite (Southern Cross University) Camouflaged politics: War stories and hegemonic masculinities Ben Wadham (Flinders University) Mental health outcomes of partners of Australian combat veterans: A comparative study with Australian population norms Gail MacDonnell (Australian Families of the Military Research Foundation) Blackmail, propaganda & international manipulation: LTTE strategy in 2008-09 Michael Roberts (University of Adelaide) Downstairs Foyer 11:00pm – 11:30pm Morning Break (Tea/Coffee provided) Room H1-44 11:30am – 1:00pm Panel Session 2: Writing in War Private letters, public spaces Caroline Adams (University of South Australia) A journey for our lost: Remembering Gallipoli Azer Banu Kemaloğlu (Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University) Just a line: Writing stories from the archives Dianne de Bellis (University of South Australia) The Gallipoli wars in Turkish war literature Omer Cakir (Cankiri Karatekin University) 1:00am – 2:00pm Lunch (BYO) Room H1-44 Panel Session 3: Media Traces of War 2:00pm – 3:30pm The war in the north: How The Cairns Post reported World War 2 Kerry Green (University of South Australia) An Australian story: The making of Anzac Sharon Mascall-Dare (University of South Australia) Did Pfeiffer slack? The legacy of one conscientious objector Carolyn Bilsborow (University of South Australia) A fearful ephemera: Written traces of WWII Civil Defence Martin Wimmer (Flinders University) Thursday, 21 November 2013 Downstairs Foyer Afternoon Break (Tea/Coffee provided) 3:30pm – 3:45pm Room H1-44 3:45pm – 5:15pm Panel Session 4: Tourism, Pilgrims and the Commemoration of War War reporting as travel writing Peter Bishop (University of South Australia) Travels to Gallipoli and the re-forging of Australian national identity Brad West (University of South Australia) Swimming through history: Sport and the construction of the Gallipoli touristscape Jim McKay (University of Queensland) Traces of Kampuchea Nigel Starck (University of South Australia) Downstairs Foyer Book Launch with Drinks and Nibbles 5:15pm – 6:00pm ‘There and Back with a Dinkum’, WRG Colman Claire Woods and Paul Skrebels In 1915, a young man deferred his university studies and enlisted in the AIF. He returned after the war a tough, scarred and decorated officer. His remarkable account as a civilian soldier, discovered in the Australian War Memorial archives, has been brought to publication by Woods and Skrebels. Colman shows himself to be an astute observer of what it meant to be one of the hundreds of thousands men who volunteered to serve at Gallipoli and on the Western Front. With a compassionate gaze and his eye for detail, not only on the battlefield but in the daily slog of the enlisted man, Colman helps us understand what it was like to go from classroom to war. Woods and Skrebels were given access by Colman’s family to his original diary, field notebook, manuscript and photo album, and to these they have added painstaking research in order to annotate and augment the narrative. This is an account of a South Australian soldier of the 27th Battalion; yet, it is a powerful story for all who seek to know something of the experiences of the young men who served in the Australian Imperial Force in World War 1. The book will be launched by Brigadier Pat Beale, DSO, MC (Retd). Pat Beale saw active service in Malaya and in Borneo during Confrontation when he was awarded the Military Cross. Then, in the mid sixties, after a stint as Adjutant of 27th Battalion, the Royal South Australia Regiment, he was Intelligence Officer of the Pacific Islands Regiment in Wewak PNG.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Gallipoli
    Beyond Gallipoli New Perspectives on Anzac Edited by Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates © Copyright 2016 Copyright of this collection in its entirety is held by Raelene Frances and Bruce Scates. Copyright of the individual chapters is held by the respective chapter authors. All rights reserved. Apart from any uses permitted by Australia’s Copyright Act 1968, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the copyright owners. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher. Monash University Publishing Matheson Library and Information Services Building 40 Exhibition Walk Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia www.publishing.monash.edu Monash University Publishing brings to the world publications which advance the best traditions of humane and enlightened thought. Monash University Publishing titles pass through a rigorous process of independent peer review. www.publishing.monash.edu/books/bg-9781925495102.html Series: Australian History Series Editor / Board: Sean Scalmer Design: Les Thomas Front cover image: Exhibition Giant, Gallipoli: The Scale of Our War, Private Colin Airlie Warden (1890–1915), Auckland Infantry Battalion. Photograph by Michael Hall. Courtesy of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Back cover image: ‘Peace’ ferry, with warship in the background, Anzac Cove, 2015. Photo by Bruce Scates.. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Title: Beyond Gallipoli : new perspectives on Anzac / edited by Raelene Frances, Bruce Scates. ISBN: 9781925495102 (paperback) Subjects: World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--Australia. World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--New Zealand. World War, 1914-1918--Social aspects--Turkey. War and society. Other Creators/Contributors: Frances, Raelene, editor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Militarisation of Australian History and Culture Thesis: the Case of Anzac Battlefield Tourism
    A Critique of the Militarisation of Australian History and Culture Thesis: The Case of Anzac Battlefield Tourism Jim McKay, Centre for Critical and Cultural Studies, University of Queensland This special issue on travel from Australia through a multidisciplinary lens is particularly apposite to the increasing popularity of Anzac battlefield tourism. Consider, for instance, the Dawn Service at Gallipoli in 2015, which will be the highlight of the commemoration of the Anzac Centenary between 2014 and 2018 (Anzac Centenary 2012). Australian battlefield tourism companies are already fully booked for this event, which is forecast to be ‘the largest peacetime gathering of Australians outside of Australia’ (Kelly 2011). Some academics have argued that rising participation in Anzac battlefield tours is symptomatic of a systemic and unrelenting militarisation of Australian history and culture. Historians Marilyn Lake, Mark McKenna and Henry Reynolds are arguably the most prominent proponents of this line of reasoning. According to McKenna: It seems impossible to deny the broader militarisation of our history and culture: the surfeit of jingoistic military histories, the increasing tendency for military displays before football grand finals, the extension of the term Anzac to encompass firefighters and sporting champions, the professionally stage-managed event of the dawn service at Anzac Cove, the burgeoning popularity of battlefield tourism (particularly Gallipoli and the Kokoda Track), the ubiquitous newspaper supplements extolling the virtues of soldiers past and present, and the tendency of the media and both main political parties to view the death of the last World War I veterans as significant national moments. (2007) In the opening passage of their book, What’s Wrong With Anzac? The Militarisation of Australian History (henceforth, WWWA), to which McKenna contributed a chapter, Lake and Reynolds also avowed that militarisation was a pervasive and inexorable PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission by Heritage Guardians on Behalf of 82 Individuals
    Submission by Heritage Guardians on behalf of 82 individuals This submission is made by Heritage Guardians on behalf of the individuals whose names appear below, following their agreement to be included. The submission addresses the first and second terms of reference of the inquiry: • the stated purpose of the proposed work and its suitability for that purpose; • the need for the work. The Australian War Memorial’s $498 million extensions should not proceed. They cannot be justified. The money would be better spent on direct benefits to veterans and their families and on other national institutions. The Memorial should be revered, but Australia has many stories. Excessive veneration of the Anzac story denies the richness of our history, as presented in our many cultural institutions. The Memorial has been treated most generously by successive governments and has suffered less from the ‘efficiency dividend’ that has damaged other institutions. The Memorial wants added space to display more of the big artefacts representing recent conflicts, and to ‘heal’ veterans. Responsibility for veterans’ welfare belongs not with the Memorial but with Defence and Veterans’ Affairs. The Memorial’s ambition to provide a ‘therapeutic milieu’ for veterans trivialises the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and suggests that memorials can play such a role – a claim for which there is scant evidence. Much of the Memorial’s extended space will be taken up with a grandiose foyer and space to display decommissioned planes and helicopters, which do little to promote an understanding of Australia’s wars, while providing a tourist attraction. Cultural institutions around the world can display only a small proportion of their holdings at any one time.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The First Casualty When War Comes Is Truth'
    ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’ 54 ‘The First Casualty When War Comes is Truth’: Neglected Atrocity in First World War Australian Memory Emily Gallagher Fourth Year Undergraduate, University of Notre Dame ‘The first casualty when war comes is truth’1 Hiram W. Johnson It is assumed, at least in the West, that the glorification of war is a thing of the past. Even more widely accepted is the perception that modern veneration honours the dead without bias or prejudice. In fact, the rich tapestry of the ANZAC legend glorifies war and readily rejects its associated horrors, projecting constructions of heroism and virtue onto national memory. Exploring the popular perception that inhumane war practices are inherently non-Western, this paper assesses the persisting silence on the grotesque experiences of soldiers in war. An examination of the nature and use of chemical warfare in World War One (WWI) and historiographical analysis of Australian scholarship on WWI will form the foundation of case evidence. Additionally, the psychological analysis of ‘joyful killing’ will be discussed as a potential framework through which modern commemoration can expose past embellishments. Bruce Scates’ Return to Gallipoli considers death and the ‘narrowed’ nature of ANZAC war commemoration. He argues that commemorative services perform a conservative political purpose, 1 Attributed to Senator Hiram Johnson in 1917, this quote originates from Samuel Johnson in 1758. See Suzy Platt (ed.), Respectfully Quoted: a Dictionary of Quotations Requested from the Congressional Research service(Washington: Library of Congress, 1989), 360. 55 history in the making vol. 4 no. 1 where personal mourning is displaced with sentiments of patriotism and sacrifice.2 Pronouncing WWI the ‘great imaginative event’ of the century, Peter Hoffenberg argues that Australians have sought to comprehend the catastrophe of war through references to landscape.3 Certainly, the WWI cemeteries on the Western Front strongly support this venture.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Nation's Memory Bank an Open Letter to the Prime Minister
    Saving the Nation’s Memory Bank An Open Letter to the Prime Minister We write as friends and supporters of the National Archives of Australia. Some of us are historians, including multiple winners of Prime Minister’s Awards, some are independent writers and researchers, and some are former members of the National Archives Advisory Council. We have differing political viewpoints but share a deep love for the knowledge of Australia’s past embodied in its archives and libraries. We are writing to you because we fear that the integrity of the nation’s premier memory bank, the National Archives of Australia, is in jeopardy and to urge you to secure its future. As the institution created by parliament to maintain the official records of the Commonwealth, the National Archives is one of the pillars of our democracy. It makes decision-making more transparent. It holds governments, past and present, to account. And in the words of Justice Michael Kirby, it ‘holds up a mirror to the people of Australia’. In this respect, the National Archives is not like other cultural institutions, such as museums, galleries and opera houses. Its most important users have yet to be born. The value of many items in its collection may not become apparent for many years because we simply do not know what questions future inquirers may ask. Only in recent years, for example, have researchers begun to tap the riches of the National Archives’ repatriation records, the largest continuous record of the health of any people anywhere, for medical as well as historical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Anzac Day Media Style Guide
    2013 Anzac Day Media Style Guide Anzac Day Media Style Guide 2013 Contents (click on headings below to navigate the guide) About this Guide ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Further acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 5 Your feedback is welcome ...................................................................................................................... 5 Getting Started ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Anzac/ANZAC ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Anzac Day or ANZAC Day? .................................................................................................................. 7 Background: The Gallipoli Landings on 25 April 1915 ............................................................................ 8 Key Dates of the Gallipoli Campaign ....................................................................................................... 9 Gallipoli, Gallipoli and Gelibolu ......................................................................................................... 10 John Simpson Kirkpatrick (1892-1915) ............................................................................................. 10
    [Show full text]
  • Museums and History
    Understanding Museums: Australian museums and museology Des Griffin and Leon Paroissien (eds) Museums and history In the years following World War II, history in Australian schools, universities and museums generally continued a long-standing focus on the country’s British heritage and on Australia’s involvement in war. However, by the 1970s Australia’s history and cultural development had begun to take a more important place in literature, in school curricula, and in universities, where specialised courses were providing training for future historians and museum curators. The essays in this section recount the way museums in Australia have dealt with crucial issues of the formation of national memory and identity. Contents Museums and history: Introduction, Leon Paroissien and Des Griffin War and Australia's museums, Peter Stanley History in the new millennium or problems with history?, Tim Sullivan Museums, history and the creation of memory, 1970–2008, Margaret Anderson Redeveloping ports, rejuvenating heritage: Australian maritime museums, Kevin Jones Museums and multiculturalism: too vague to understand, too important to ignore, Viv Szekeres Online version: http://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/Museums_history.html Image credit: Ludwig Leichhardt nameplate, discovered attached to a partly burnt firearm in a bottle tree (boab) near Sturt Creek, between the Tanami and Great Sandy Deserts in Western Australia. Photo: Dragi Markovic. http://www.nma.gov.au/collections/highlights/the-leichhardt-nameplate Understanding Museums - Museums and history 1 http://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/Museums_history.html National Museum of Australia Copyright and use © Copyright National Museum of Australia Copyright Material on this website is copyright and is intended for your general use and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Journey Resource Guide
    Australian Journey The Story of a Nation in 12 Objects Resources for the Journey Texts to Read | Websites to Visit Podcasts to listen to | Film and Literature Primary Sources |Defining Moments This booklet is produced by the Australian National University as a free educational resource. We gratefully acknowledge our collaboration with Monash University, the National Museum of Australia and all the cultural institutions featured in this project. Join us on an Australian Journey Australian Journey is designed for anyone, anywhere interested in Australia. Exploring the themes of Land, People, and Nation, it offers a road map to our country’s Past, Present, and Future. Australian Journey will take you the length and breadth of the continent, and across almost four billion years of history, in 12 short and engaging episodes. And every episode uses objects to reveal the stories of a nation. What do these pieces of the past tell us about their time, their purpose and their maker? Some of the objects we have chosen are famous, iconic or familiar; others obscure, even quirky. But all our objects tell a story and all find a place in the National Museum of Australia. Australian Journey is presented by Professor Bruce Scates and Dr Susan Carland. Resources for the Journey This booklet recommends a range of resources to complement each episode of Australian Journey. School teachers, international university students and the general public can use this guide to find texts, websites, podcasts, films, and literature to augment teaching and learning about the Australian nation. A collection of written, audio, internet and visual sources, this booklet will enable you to extend your knowledge of Australian history and engage further in the historical debates around the objects featured in Australian Journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary (Australia)
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 11 May 2021 Centenary (Australia) By Bruce Scates From 2010-2020, Australia fielded the longest, most expensive, and arguably most complex Great War centenary of any combatant nation. It involved unprecedented investment from the state, but was also driven by popular initiatives. “Bottom up” commemoration involved actual people taking on the work of remembrance, shaping and reshaping its complex, and much contested character. The form that labour took, in locations as diverse as museums and battlefields, performative theatre and critical history, is the subject of this article. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Historical Background 3 Orchestrating Anzac: Government Infrastructure 4 History Wars 5 Government Sanctioned Remembrance: The Dispersal of Centenary Funding 6 Commemorating from the Bottom Up 7 Conclusion Notes Selected Bibliography Citation Introduction At the beginning of 2014, James Brown warned of the drift ofA ustralia’s First World War commemorative program. “Anzac”, the former army officer claimed, had become the country’s “national obsession”. Whilst the rest of the world pondered the cost of a war that had torn Europe apart, Australians claimed a bungled battle on Gallipoli signalled the “birth of a nation”. While historians gauged the dimensions of a truly global conflict, Australians exaggerated their comparatively minor part in it. The nomenclature of 2014-2018 is telling. Elsewhere it marks the centenary of the First World War; in Australia it is styled “the Anzac Centenary”. The centenary, Brown concluded, would prove “a discordant, lengthy and exorbitant four year festival of the dead.”[1] There is much to be said for that analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Battle for Australia
    Remembering the Battle for Australia Elizabeth Rechniewski, University of Sydney Introduction On 26 June 2008 the Australian minister for Veterans’ Affairs, Alan Griffin, announced that ‘Battle for Australia Day’ would be commemorated on the first Wednesday in September; this proclamation fulfilled a Labor Party election promise and followed a ten-year campaign by returned soldiers and others to commemorate the battles that constituted the Pacific War. The very recent inauguration of this day enables an examination of the dynamics of the processes involved in the construction of national commemorations. The aim of this article is to identify the various agencies involved in the process of ‘remembering the Battle for Australia’ and the channels they have used to spread their message; to trace the political and historical controversies surrounding the notion of a ‘Battle for Australia’ and the conflicting narratives to which they have given rise; and to outline the ‘chronopolitics,’ the shifts in domestic and international politics that ‘over time created the conditions for changes in the memoryscape and, sometimes, alterations in the heroic narrative as well’ (Gluck 2007: 61). The title of this article is intended to recall Jay Winter’s insistence that the terms ‘remembering’ and ‘remembrance’ be used, rather than memory, in order to emphasise the active role of agents in the creation and perpetuation of memory and acts of commemoration (2006: 3). Timothy Ashplant, Grant Dawson and Michael Roper, in a broad ranging study of war memory, emphasise the role of constituencies, or agents of remembrance in the process of memory formation and the struggle to articulate distinct and often competing memories in the array of arenas available.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Martial Madonna: the Army Nurse's Commemoration in Stained
    Australia’s Martial Madonna: the army nurse’s commemoration in stained glass windows (1919-1951) Susan Elizabeth Mary Kellett, RN Bachelor of Nursing (Honours), Graduate Diploma of Nursing (Perioperative) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of History and Philosophical Enquiry Abstract This thesis examines the portrayal of the army nurse in commemorative stained glass windows commissioned between 1919 and 1951. In doing so, it contests the prevailing understanding of war memorialisation in Australia by examining the agency of Australia’s churches and their members – whether clergy or parishioner – in the years following World Wars I and II. Iconography privileging the nurse was omitted from most civic war memorials following World War I when many communities used the idealised form of an infantryman to assuage their collective grief and recognise the service of returned menfolk to King and Country. Australia’s religious spaces were also deployed as commemorative spaces and the site of the nurse’s remembrance as the more democratic processes of parishes and dioceses that lost a member of the nursing services gave sanctuary to her memory, alongside a range of other service personnel, in their windows. The nurse’s depiction in stained glass was influenced by architectural relationships and socio- political dynamics occurring in the period following World War I. This thesis argues that her portrayal was also nuanced by those who created these lights. Politically, whether patron or artist, those personally involved in the prosecution of war generally facilitated equality in remembrance while citizens who had not frequently exploited memory for individual or financial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Goethe University Frankfurt Presents the 2Nd Goethe/Monash Academic Exchange Event National Celebrations and Cultural Memory In
    Goethe University Frankfurt presents the 2nd Goethe/Monash Academic Exchange Event 12 February 2014, 18.30h, IG Building Room 311, Westend Campus, Goethe University Frankfurt National Celebrations and Cultural Memory in Multicultural Societies The significance of national memorial holidays such as Australia Day or ANZAC Day Prof Rae Frances and Prof Bruce Scates from Monash University Melbourne together with Prof Astrid Erll and Prof Frank Schulze-Engler from Goethe University Frankfurt will discuss how modern societies deal with contested events of their national histories. How does perception change over time and which ideological messages are transmitted today? Who is addressed, who is included, and who is not? Australia Day and ANZAC Day serve as examples, celebrating events that some Australians seem to proudly perceive as the origin of modern Australia, while other Australians predominantly see them as the beginning of European invasion of the continent, suppression, and suffering, or as a national myth that excludes indigenous people as well as later generations of migrants. Many other Australians, often with a more recent history of migration (e.g. from continental Europe or Asia), might not ascribe much relevance at all to either memorial day and simply enjoy the public holiday. It is the dynamics of collective memory, increased amongst others by modern media, that shape cultural identities, both on an individual as well as national level. While politics might draw on such events in order to create a national identity – and again the question to be discussed here is: who is addressed, who is included, and who is not? – there is also a more subliminal level of negotiation and perception within society.
    [Show full text]