DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond the Exhibition Carel Fabritius

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond the Exhibition Carel Fabritius Carel Fabritius: Beyond the Exhibition Carel Fabritius (1622-1654) left a small number of paintings of certain attribution. But in his short life he produced some of the finest examples of Dutch seventeenth- century painting, including such works as The Goldfinch, in the Mauritshuis, The Hague, and The Sentry, in the Staatliches Museum, Schwerin. To mark the 35oth anni- versary of the artist's death, these two museums joined forces and set out to organise the first monographic exhibition dedicated to Fabritius.' The aim of the organisers was to bring together all the 'certified' works, as well as the most important attribu- tions, in order to enhance our view of Fabritius's artistic development. This resulted in an impressive exhibition, which was a treat for the eyes, and gave art historians a good opportunity to compare recent attributions with works that are indisputably by Fabritius, several of which were conserved and restored for the exhibition. The conservation and restoration itself led to some interesting discoveries, such as the deceptively realistic nail, which was exposed in the background of the Portrait of' Abraham de Potter (see p. 8 7, fig. 2I), and the legs of a soldier walking along the wall behind the archway in Tbe Sentry (see p. ioo, fig. i). In addition, the selected works were subjected to a thorough art-historical and (where possible) technical investiga- tion. The outcome of these investigations was published in the exhibition catalogue, which contains an extensive introductory chapter by Frits Duparc; the catalogue entries were written by Gero Seelig and Ariane van Suchtelen.' The exhibition and its catalogue were certainly not intended to provide a defini- tive answer to the many questions surrounding Fabritius's oeuvre, but aimed rather to provide a starting point for further research. This led the Mauritshuis and the Netherlands Institute for Art History (RKD) to hold an international symposium at the time of the exhibition in The Hague, in order to stimulate an exchange of ideas.3 In the course of this two-day symposium, on i and 2 December a lively (and sometimes heated) discussion ensued about paintings which had recently been added to, or removed from the oeuvre. The first day, which took place in the Mauritshuis, was for a select group of participants only, in order to allow discussion directly in front of the paintings. There was a series of brief presentations of the technical find- ings that emerged from the restoration of a number of Fabritius's paintings prior to the exhibition.4 The second day, which was held at the RKD, was a public event; the programme consisted of a series of talks by specialists who focused on various aspects of Fabritius's work. In the aftermath of this successful symposium, it was decided to invite some of the speakers to convert their talks into articles for this special issue of Dud Holland. Frits Duparc, who initiated the exhibition, has written an article based on his own talk, and that of Jorgcn Wadum, then Chief Curator at the Mauritshuis. In it he makes the case for several recent attributions to Fabritius, which remain the subject of controversy, using the sometimes remarkable results of the technical research done 73 during the exhibition. Volker Manuth, in his article, offers important new informa- tion about the provenance of The Sentry, and also suggests a possible identification for the archway featuring in the image. Walter Liedtke calls for a reconsideration of some works which the organisers of the exhibition no longer regarded as by Fabritius, and which were accordingly left out of the selection. (Two of these were, in fact, later shown at the second venue, in Schwerin.) Peter Schatborn endeavours to attribute a group of drawings to Carel Fabritius on purely stylistic grounds, an aspect, which be- cause of its speculative character, could not be accommodated in the exhibition itself. Christopher Brown, author of the most recent monograph on Fabritius, published in i98i, was invited to give a personal evaluation of the exhibition and the catalogue. In addition to these lectures, we have included three further essays, which were written directly in response to the exhibition. J. Bruyn draws our attention to the presence of two early works by Fabritius in Paris auction catalogues of the second half of the eighteenth century. Gero Seelig suggests that the artist arrived in Rembrandt's workshop at a considerably earlier date than was hitherto assumed, a hypothesis he first put forward at a second Fabritius symposium in Schwerin, on 28 May 2005. Jonathan Bikker discusses the provenance and attribution of the Beheading ofjohn the Baptist in the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam (see p. m, fig. i), a painting long thought to be by Fabritius, but rejected by the exhibition organisers and shown only in Schwerin. The symposium in The Hague offered a great deal more than we are able to include in this special double issue. Ernst van de Wetering gave a lively account of Rembrandt's workshop, talking about how it could have functioned and what role the young Fabritius might have had there. Jeroen Giltaij and Albert Blankert reiter- ated their strong doubts concerning the authenticity of Mercury, Argus en Io (see p. 76, fig. i), which each had voiced separately in earlier publications (of 1988 and i992-i993): despite the signature Carolus Fabritius, they feel that for stylistic reasons this work cannot be regarded as by Carel Fabritius.5 On the same grounds, they argue that other early works grouped around this painting - Mercury and Aglauros (see p. 80, fig. 7) and the so-called Hera (see p. 85, fig. 15) - should also be disregarded. One painting that gave rise to particular controversy, was the portrait from the Alte Pinakothek, Munich (see p. 87, fig. 18), described in the catalogue as a Self- Portrait by Carel Fabritius. In the recent past, most writers (including Brown and Sumowski) have attributed this work to Carel's brother, Barent, describing it either as a self-portrait, or a portrait of Care1.6 During the discussion in front of the actual painting, experts expressed strong doubts not only about its identification as a self- portrait, but also about its attribution to Carel.' It was agreed that a restoration of this canvas, in combination with a thorough, technical examination, would be highly desirable, and could shcd new light on the question of its attribution. The attentive reader studying the articles in this issue will notice that a consensus is still a long way off on some issues. Works that have been rejected by one expert are reinstated by the next - a case in point is the Man in a Helmet in Groningen (see the article by Brown, p. i4o, fig. i). The editors have made no attempt whatsoever to reconcile the diverse opinions, but want rather to offer a platform for art-historical debate. We hope that this special Fabritius issue will contribute to the ongoing dis- cussion about one of the most intriguing artistic personalities of the Dutch Golden Age, about whose life and work much is still to be uncovered. We would like to thank the contributors, and the staff of the Mauritshuis for their ready help in putting together this special issue. The Hague, October zoo6 Rudi Ekkart, director, RKD Edwin Buijsen, editor of this special issue 74 NOTES I 4 5 Mauritshuis,The Hague,z4 4 The programmeon i December Seethe articleby Duparc,p. 89, Septemberzoo4 -9 January2 oo 5; containcdthe followingpresenta- note 6. StaatlichesMuseum, Schwerin, z8 8 tions :Gcorg Janczarski,7he Resto- January -16 May zoo5 (extended rationof theRaising of Lazarus' in 6 SeeThe Hague/Schwerin ioo4- until 5June 2005). theMuzeum Narodowe, Warschau; zoo5(note i), no. (entry by G. Wadum, 2 Jorgcn Highlightsof IZe- Seelig). G. A. van search the Exhibition;Gwen F.J.Duparc, Seelig, during ' Suchtelen,exh. cat. CarelFabritius Tauber,Restoration and lechrzical For a criticaldiscussion of theattri- Hague(Maurits- Researchof the'Portrait ofAbraham bution of thispainting, in response huis)/Schwerin(Staatliches de Potter'in theRijksmuseum to the exhibition,see also L. Pincus, Museum)ioo4-ioos. (seealso G. Tauber, ANote on Experimentin severlteenth-century TechnicalPeculiarities in a 1'ortrait theart ; Dutch painting: of Carel For a reportof thissymposium, by CarelFabritiusl i4rtMatters2 Fabritius,dissertation, University of see G. Seelig, `C;arelFabritius, io3-io8);Korneliavon Chicagoz.oo5, pp. 178-184. Symposiumdes Niederlandischen Berswordt-Wallrabe,The Restora- Institutsfiir Kunstgcschichtc(RKD) tionof 'TheSeratry'irl Schwerin; und desMauritshuis, Den Haag, Arianevan Suchtelen,The Man in i.- i. Dezemberioo41 Kunstchronik a Helmet'.l 5 g,no. i (zoo5),pp. 6-11. 75 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carel Fabritius (Middenbeemster 1622 – 1654 Delft)
    Carel Fabritius (Middenbeemster 1622 – 1654 Delft) How To Cite Bakker, Piet. "Carel Fabritius." In The Leiden Collection Catalogue. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017. https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/. This page is available on the site's Archive. PDF of every version of this page is available on the Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. Archival copies will never be deleted. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. In studying the life and work of Carel Fabritius, one soon notices that scholarly interest in his artistry focuses on two different “periods”: a real one and an imagined one. Naturally, the most attention is given to Carel’s actual career, which began around 1641 and ended in 1654. Then there is the great speculation regarding the period that never existed, but which could have, had his life not been cut short by the devastating explosion of the powder magazine in Delft in 1654. Only thirteen paintings have been firmly attributed to him, and his limited artistic legacy is sorely lamented. Famous paintings likeThe Goldfinch[1] andThe Sentry[2] bespeak such originality and artistic quality that we can only regret all the works he never painted. Unfortunately, his untimely death has made it virtually impossible to determine whether his talent would have eventually been great enough to equal, if not surpass, that of his teacher, Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–69). Fabritius’s parents were Pieter Carelsz and Barbertje van der Maes. He was baptized in Middenbeemster, a village just north of Amsterdam, on 27 February 1622.[3] His father worked there as a sexton, a schoolteacher and, in “the spare time outside school,” also as a painter.[4] Thus Carel, like his brothers Barent (1624–73) and Johannes, must have received his first painting lessons from his father.
    [Show full text]
  • Colnaghistudiesjournal Journal-01
    EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Charles Avery Art Historian specializing in European Xavier F. Salomon Peter Jay Sharp Chief Curator, The Frick Sculpture, particularly Italian, French and English. Collection, New York. Colin Bailey Director, Morgan Library and Museum, New York. Salvador Salort-Pons Director, President & CEO, Detroit Francesca Baldassari Art Historian. Institute of Arts. Piers Baker-Bates Visiting Research Associate in Art History, Jack Soultanian Conservator, The Metropolitan Museum of Colnaghi Studies Journal is produced biannually by the Colnaghi Foundation. Its purpose is Art, New York. The Open University. to publish texts on significant pre-twentieth-century artworks in the European tradition Bruce Boucher Director, Sir John Soane’s Museum, London. Nicola Spinosa Former Director of Museo di Capodimonte, Naples. that have recently come to light or about which new research is underway, as well as Till-Holger Borchert Director, Musea Brugge. Carl Strehlke Adjunct Emeritus, Philadelphia Museum of Art. on the history of their collection. Texts about artworks should place them within the Antonia Boström Keeper of Sculpture, Metalwork, Ceramics Holly Trusted Senior Curator of Sculpture, Victoria & Albert broader context of the artist’s oeuvre, provide visual analysis and comparative images. & Glass, Victoria & Albert Museum, London. Museum, London. Edgar Peters Bowron Former Audrey Jones Beck Curator of Manuscripts may be sent at any time and will be reviewed by members of the journal’s Benjamin van Beneden Director, Rubenshuis, Antwerp. European Art, The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. Editorial Committee, composed of specialists on painting, sculpture, architecture, Mark Westgarth Programme Director and Lecturer in Art History Xavier Bray Director, The Wallace Collection, London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Engagement of Carel Fabritius's Goldfinch of 1654 with the Dutch
    Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art Volume 8, Issue 1 (Winter 2016) The Engagement of Carel Fabritius’s Goldfinch of 1654 with the Dutch Window, a Significant Site of Neighborhood Social Exchange Linda Stone-Ferrier [email protected] Recommended Citation: Linda Stone-Ferrier, “The Engagement of Carel Fabritius’ Goldfinch of 1654 with the Dutch Window, a Significant Site of Neighborhood Social Exchange,” JHNA 8:1 (Winter 2016), DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2016.8.1.5 Available at http://www.jhna.org/index.php/vol-8-1-2016/325-stone-ferrier Published by Historians of Netherlandish Art: http://www.hnanews.org/ Terms of Use: http://www.jhna.org/index.php/terms-of-use Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. This PDF provides paragraph numbers as well as page numbers for citation purposes. ISSN: 1949-9833 JHNA 7:2 (Summer 2015) 1 THE ENGAGEMENT OF CAREL FABRITIUS’S GOLDFINCH OF 1654 WITH THE DUTCH WINDOW, A SIGNIFICANT SITE OF NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIAL EXCHANGE Linda Stone-Ferrier This article posits that Carel Fabritius’s illusionistic painting The Goldfinch, 1654, cleverly traded on the experience of a passerby standing on an actual neighborhood street before a household window. In daily discourse, the window func- tioned as a significant site of neighborhood social exchange and social control, which official neighborhood regulations mandated. I suggest that Fabritius’s panel engaged the window’s prominent role in two possible ways. First, the trompe l’oeil painting may have been affixed to the inner jamb of an actual street-side window, where goldfinches frequently perched in both paintings and in contemporary households.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Steen: the Drawing Lesson
    Jan Steen THE DRAWING LESSON Jan Steen THE DRAWING LESSON John Walsh GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART Los ANGELES For my teacher Julius S. Held in gratitude Christopher Hudson, Publisher Cover: Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor Jan Steen (Dutch, 1626-1679). The Drawing Lesson, circa 1665 (detail). Oil on panel, Mollie Holtman, Editor 49.3 x 41 cm. (i93/s x i6î/4 in.). Los Angeles, Stacy Miyagawa, Production Coordinator J. Paul Getty Museum (83.PB.388). Jeffrey Cohen, Designer Lou Meluso, Photographer Frontispiece: Jan Steen. Self-Portrait, circa 1665. © 1996 The J. Paul Getty Museum Oil on canvas, 73 x 62 cm (283/4 x 243/ in.). 17985 Pacific Coast Highway 8 Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum (sK-A-383). Malibu, California 90265-5799 All works of art are reproduced (and photographs Mailing address: provided) courtesy of the owners unless other- P.O. BOX 2112 wise indicated. Santa Monica, California 90407-2112 Typography by G & S Typesetting, Inc., Library of Congress Austin, Texas Cataloging-in-Publication Data Printed by Typecraft, Inc., Pasadena, California Walsh, John, 1937- Bound by Roswell Bookbinding, Phoenix, Jan Steen : the Drawing lesson / John Walsh, Arizona p. cm.—(Getty Museum studies on art) Includes bibliographic references. ISBN 0-89326-392-4 1. Steen, Jan, 1626-1679 Drawing lesson. 2. Steen, Jan, 1626-1679—Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. II. Series. ND653.S8A64 1996 759.9492—dc20 96-3913 CIP CONTENTS Introduction i A Familiar Face 5 Picturing the Workshop 27 The Training of a Painter 43 Another Look Around 61 Notes on the Literature 78 Acknowledgments 88 Final page folds out, providing a reference color plate of The Drawing Lesson INTRODUCTION In a spacious vaulted room a painter leans over to correct a drawing by one of his two pupils, a young boy and a beautifully dressed girl, who look on [FIGURE i and FOLDOUT].
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Archived Version
    Hagar and the Angel ca. 1645 Carel Fabritius oil on canvas (Middenbeemster 1622 – 1654 Delft) 157.5 x 136 cm signed in brown paint, bottom left corner, “C P Fabritius” CF-100 Currently on view at: The National Museum of China, Beijing © 2017 The Leiden Collection Hagar and the Angel Page 2 of 16 How To Cite Surh, Dominique. "Hagar and the Angel." In The Leiden Collection Catalogue. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017. https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/. This page is available on the site's Archive. PDF of every version of this page is available on the Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. Archival copies will never be deleted. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. © 2017 The Leiden Collection Hagar and the Angel Page 3 of 16 Carel Fabritius, who died tragically at the height of his career in the Comparative Figures explosion of the Delft powder house in 1654, painted this masterpiece around 1645, shortly after he had completed his apprenticeship with Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–69).[1] It is one of only five surviving history paintings from his hand (only 13 paintings by him are known) and his sole painting still in a private collection.[2] Fabritius selected dramatic moments from the Bible and classical mythology, often unusual subjects that he treated in movingly human terms. Here, in this rare and wonderful example, we see this gifted painter and storyteller at his very best. He focuses the viewer’s attention on Hagar’s moment of suffering, while alluding to other moments in the broader narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of the Town in the Paintings of the 17 Century Delft School of Painting
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 19 (4): 501-504, 2014 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2014 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.19.4.21003 The Image of the Town in the Paintings of the 17th Century Delft School of Painting: The Issue of Genre Synthesis Anna Alekseevna Dmitrieva Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia Abstract: The article examines the works of the Dutch artists of the 17th century Delft School of painting, which exemplify à synthesis of townscape painting and the daily-life genre. The topicality of this subject is due to the fact that it has not been developed sufficiently enough in historiography. The article’s scientific novelty lies in that it provides a detailed analysis of paintings based on the formal-stylistic and retrospective methods. Especial attention is given to the works of Carel Fabritius and Pieter de Hooch. The author comes to the conclusion that the paintings of the Delft artists are on the border of two genres - topographical townscape painting and the daily-life genre. In this context, they serve as the basis for the emergence of 18th century veduta painting. Key words: Delft 17th century Dutch painting, townscape Daily-life genre Perspective Genre synthesis INTRODUCTION The Delft painters depicted scenes from the everyday life of the Dutch bourgeoisie, often placing them within The 17th century is rightfully considered the town settings. Themes created by them on the border of Golden epoch of Dutch painting. The leading genres two genres demonstrate not just objects of architecture of this period were landscape painting and the daily- but a complex “image of the town”, which consists of life genre.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermeer, Johannes Also Known As Vermeer, Jan Vermeer Van Delft Dutch, 1632 - 1675
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Vermeer, Johannes Also known as Vermeer, Jan Vermeer van Delft Dutch, 1632 - 1675 Johannes Vermeer, The Procuress (detail), 1656, oil on canvas, Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden BIOGRAPHY The life and art of Johannes Vermeer are closely associated with the city of Delft. He was born in Delft in 1632 and lived there until his death in 1675. His father, Reynier Vermeer, was a silk weaver who produced caffa, a fine satin fabric, but in 1631 he also registered in the Saint Luke’s Guild in Delft as a master art dealer. By 1641 he was sufficiently prosperous to purchase a large house, the “Mechelen,” which contained an inn on the market square in Delft and from which he probably also sold paintings. When Reynier died in 1652 Johannes apparently inherited his business. By that time he must have already decided on a career as a painter. It is assumed that he trained in Delft, perhaps with Leonard Bramer (Dutch, 1596 - 1674), who seems to have had close associations with Vermeer’s family, or with Carel Fabritius (Dutch, c. 1622 - 1654). No documents, however, exist about his artistic training or apprenticeship, and he may have studied elsewhere, perhaps in Utrecht or Amsterdam. Vermeer, who was baptized on October 31, 1632, in the Reformed Church in Delft, was raised a Protestant. In April 1653, however, he married into a Catholic family and seems to have converted to Catholicism shortly before that date to placate his future mother-in-law, Maria Thins, who lived in the so-called Papenhoek (Papists’ Corner) of Delft, adjacent to the Jesuit church on the Oude Langendijck, one of two hidden churches where Catholics could worship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2Nd Ed
    Carel Fabritius (Middenbeemster 1622 – 1654 Delft) How to cite Bakker, Piet. “Carel Fabritius” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artists/carel-fabritius/ (archived June 2020). A PDF of every version of this biography is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. In studying the life and work of Carel Fabritius, one soon notices that scholarly interest in his artistry focuses on two different “periods:” a real one and an imagined one. Naturally, the most attention is given to Fabritius’s actual career, which began around 1641 and ended in 1654. Then there is the great speculation regarding the period that never existed, but which could have, had his life not been cut short by the devastating explosion of the powder magazine in Delft in 1654. Only thirteen paintings have been firmly attributed to him, and his limited artistic legacy is sorely lamented. Famous paintings like The Goldfinch [1] and The Sentry[2] bespeak such originality and artistic quality that we can only regret all the works he never painted. Unfortunately, his untimely death has made it virtually impossible to determine whether his talent would have eventually been great enough to equal, if not surpass, that of his teacher, Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–69). Fabritius’s parents were Pieter Carelsz Fabritius (1598–1653) and Barbertje van der Maes (1601–67). He was baptized in Middenbeemster, a village just north of Amsterdam, on 27 February 1622.[3] His father worked there as a sexton, a schoolteacher and, in “the spare time outside school,” also as a painter.[4] Thus Fabritius, like his brothers Barent (1624–73) and Johannes (1636–93), must have received his first painting lessons from his father.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Van Tekst
    Rembrandt Harmens van Rijn. Deel 2. Sa vie et ses oeuvres Carel Vosmaer bron Carel Vosmaer, Rembrandt Harmens van Rijn. Deel 2. Sa vie et ses oeuvres. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1868 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/vosm001remb03_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. t.o. III LA MAISON DE REMBRANDT 1640 À 1656. Carel Vosmaer, Rembrandt Harmens van Rijn. Deel 2. Sa vie et ses oeuvres V Avant-propos. Il y a cinq années je publiai un travail sur REMBRANDT HARMENS VAN RIJN, contenant ses précurseurs, sa naissance, son apprentissage. Le présent volume embrasse sa vie et ses oeuvres. Si le précepte d'Horace - nonum prematur in annum - offre une garantie suffisante pour qu'un livre soit complet et parachevé, je pourrais amplement compter sur l'approbation de ce fin connaisseur. Cependant je ne sais que trop combien mon ouvrage est incomplet. Des collections d'art en Angleterre et en Russie, par exemple, je ne connais les peintures de Rembrandt qu'en tant qu'elles sont reproduites par les estampes. Mais je me suis dit, qu'il arrive un moment où il convient de faire une fin. J'ai pensé qu'il s'agissait bien plus de voir juste que de tout voir, ce qui du reste n'est pas possible; que l'étude de plusieurs centaines de tableaux et de dessins, des 360 eaux-fortes du Carel Vosmaer, Rembrandt Harmens van Rijn. Deel 2. Sa vie et ses oeuvres VI maître, d'une quantité d'estampes d'après ses oeuvres, devrait mettre à même de le connaître, de démontrer la marche de son talent, et qu'il importait avant tout de pénétrer aussi loin que possible dans l'esprit, dans l'âme de ce génie gigantesque.
    [Show full text]
  • Codart Courant 8/June 2004
    codart Courant 8/June 2004 codartCourant contents Published by Stichting codart P.O. Box 76709 2 A word from the director Rembrandt, their predecessors and successors: nl-1070 ka Amsterdam 3 News and notes from around the world 16th- to 18th-century Flemish and Dutch The Netherlands 3 Czech Republic, Prague, National drawings in Polish collections www.codart.nl Gallery: A birthday greeting to Hana 26 Krystyna Gutowska-Dudek, The Dutch Seifertová and Flemish paintings from the collection of Managing editor: Rachel Esner 4 France, Paris, Fondation Custodia Jan iiiSobieski housed in Wilanow Palace e [email protected] 4 Hungary, Budapest Museum of Fine Museum Arts 30 Wanda M. Rudzin´ska, The Tilman van Editors: Wietske Donkersloot, 6 Russia, St. Petersburg, State Hermitage Gameren archive in the print room of Gary Schwartz Museum Warsaw University Library t +31 (0)20 305 4515 7 codart zeven: Dutch and Flemish art 33 Study trip to Gdan´sk, Warsaw and f +31 (0)20 305 4500 in Poland Kraków, 18-25 April 2004 e [email protected] 8 Congress, Utrecht, 7-9 March 2004 39 Rulers of Poland, 14th-18th century 13 Antoni Ziemba, The Low Countries and 39 Index of Polish individuals and families codart board Poland: a history of artistic connections 40 Website news Henk van der Walle, chairman 16 Hanna Benesz, Early Netherlandish, 41 Appointments Wim Jacobs, controller of the Instituut Dutch and Flemish paintings in Polish 41 codartmembership news Collectie Nederland, secretary- collections 42 Museum list treasurer 19 Joanna Tomicka, Dutch and Flemish prints 48 codartdates Rudi Ekkart, director of the Rijksbureau in major Polish collections Preview of upcoming exhibitions and other voor Kunsthistorische Documentatie 23 Maciej Monkiewicz, Rubens and events, June-December 2004 Jan Houwert, chairman of the Board of Management of the Koninklijke Wegener N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Girl with the Red Hat 382 DUTCH PAINTINGS
    1976 Wright: 12, 42, 44, no. 16, repro. Provenance: Possibly Pieter Claesz. van Ruijven [1624- 1977 Menzel: 68, fig. 65. 1674], Delft; possibly by inheritance to his wife, Maria de 1977b Van Straaten: 48-49, fig. 60. Knuijt [d. 1681 ], Delft; possibly by inheritance to her daugh­ 1977 NGA: 47, repro. ter, Magdalena van Ruijven [1655-1682], Delft;1 possibly by 1981 Slatkes: 70-71, repro. inheritance to her husband, Jacobus Abrahamsz. Dissius 1981 Wheelock: 124-127, no. 31, repros. 31-32. [1653-1695], Delft;2 (sale, Amsterdam, 16 May 1696, proba­ 1985 NGA: 421, repro. bly no. 39 or 40).3 (Sale, Lafontaine, Hotel de Bouillon, Paris, 1986 Aillaud, Blankert, and Montias: 11, 46, 52, 85, 10 December 1822, no. 28.) Baron Louis Marie Atthalin 132, 189-190, no. 20, pi. 22. [1784-1856], Colmar; by inheritance to his nephew and 1989 Montias: 191-192, 196, 256, 259 note 21, 266, adopted son Laurent Atthalin; by inheritance to Baron Gas­ repro. 44. ton Laurent-Atthalin [d. 1911], Les Moussets, Limey, Seine- 1990 The Hague: no. 67. et-Oise; by inheritance to his widow Baroness Laurent-At- 1991 Buijsen: 7-12, repro. thalin, Paris; (M. Knoedler & Co., New York and London); 1991 Liedtke: 21-29, repro. sold November 1925 to Andrew W. Mellon. Pittsburgh and 1991 Nash: 34 color repro., 36-37. Washington; deeded 30 March 1932 to The A. W. Mellon 1993 Frankfurt: no. 85 Educational and Charitable Trust, Pittsburgh. 1995 Wheelock: 145, 179, repro. Exhibited: Loan Exhibition of Dutch Masters of the Seventeenth Century, M. Knoedler & Co., New York, 1925, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Carel Fabritius (The Hague 02 Dec 04)
    Carel Fabritius (The Hague 02 Dec 04) Carel Fabritius International symposium On the occasion of the exhibition Carel Fabritius: young master painter - held in the Mauritshuis, The Hague, from 25 September 2004 until 9 January 2005 - the Netherlands Institute for Art History (RKD) and the Mauritshuis are organizing an international scholarly symposium on this artist, focussing on new findings and insights emanating from the exhibition. Location: auditorium of the Royal Library, Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5, The Hague Programm Thursday 2 December 2004 Morning session Chair: Edwin Buijsen (RKD) 9.30 registration, coffee 10.00 welcome by: Rudi Ekkart, director of the RKD 10.10 Frits Duparc (Mauritshuis, The Hague), Introduction to the Exhibition 10.30 Jørgen Wadum (Mauritshuis, The Hague), Technical Aspects of Fabritius' Paintings 11.15 Volker Manuth (Radboud University, Nijmegen), A Note on Fabritius' Sentry in Schwerin 11.35 Peter Schatborn (formerly Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam), Drawings Attributed to Carel Fabritius 11.55 discussion 12.15 lunch Afternoon session Chair: Peter van der Ploeg (Mauritshuis) 14.00 Walter Liedtke (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York), Carel 1/2 ArtHist.net Fabritius and the Delft School 14.45 Ernst van de Wetering (Rembrandt Research Project, Amsterdam), Carel Fabritius and Rembrandt's Workshop Production 15.30 tea 15.45 Christopher Brown (Ashmolean Museum, Oxford), Reflection on Fabritius after 20 Years 16.30 discussion 17.00 conclusion of the symposium, followed by a visit to the exhibition Carel Fabritius in the Mauritshuis and drinks -- Registration: Registration fee: Euro 50, including lunch, drinks and visit to the exhibition. For more information and registration send an e-mail to [email protected] or see http://www.rkd.nl -- Hilda Stafleu Communicatie & Informatie Rijksbureau voor Kunsthistorische Documentatie (RKD) / Netherlands Institute for Art History P.O.
    [Show full text]