DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconstructing Modern and Pliocene (C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconstructing Modern and Pliocene (C RECONSTRUCTING MODERN AND PLIOCENE (C. 5.4-2.4 MA) DECADAL CLIMATE VARIATIONS IN THE PALEOENVIRONMENTS OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC BIGHT USING ISOTOPE AND INCREMENT SCLEROCHRONOLOGY Joel Wayne Hudley A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geological Sciences Chapel Hill 2012 Approved by: Dr. Donna M. Surge Dr. John M. Bane. Dr. Larry Benninger Dr. Joseph G. Carter Dr. Jonathan M. Lees © 2012 Joel Wayne Hudley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JOEL W. HUDLEY: Reconstructing modern and Pliocene (c. 5.4-2.4 Ma) decadal climate variations in the paleoenvironments of the Middle Atlantic Bight using isotope and increment sclerochronology (Under the direction of Donna Surge) Ocean characteristics on geologic timescales are poorly understood, have varied in the past, and are critical to understanding how the ocean may respond to future human- induced climate change. Recent climate studies have identified that environmental variations in the Mid-Atlantic Bight (MAB) are related to larger global climate variations throughout the Late Cenozoic such as the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation pattern and ocean-atmospheric teleconnections. Modern physical oceanographic studies in the MAB using the modern instrument records show high interannual variability with longer, multi-decadal warming trends. The goal of this investigation is to reveal annual to multi-decadal variations in sea surface temperatures of the MAB during the Pliocene (5.4-1.8 Million years ago (Ma). This investigation employs isotope and increment records from marine bivalves as proxies for ocean bottom temperature in conjunction with a basic understanding of the modern physical oceanographic flow model along the Atlantic continental shelf. In the present study, live-collected bivalves from the MAB and fossil bivalve shells from Pliocene deposits along the US Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain (MACP) were used to estimate oceanic conditions (seawater temperature, salinity, etc.) and ocean/atmosphere internal oscillations that currently dominate the basin. Sclerochronologic and stable isotope analyses were used to study this problem. Using the growth increments and iii isotope records of the modern Hemimactra as a comparison, Pliocene surf clams were employed to estimate paleoecologic and paleoclimatologic conditions along with the MACP. Pliocene surf clams documented annual increment marks and oxygen isotope ratios indicating greatly reduced seasonality, similar to the modern S. s. similis, but with similar average temperatures relative to modern SST at the same latitude. Since the surf clams present within the Pliocene MACP represent the short-lived species (~ 5 years old), in order to investigate multi-decadal variations during the Pliocene new bivalve proxies were explored. Large and abundant MACP bivalves, Glycymeris americana and Panopea reflexa were identified as having annual growth increments and significant longevity. Ages of fossil shells were comparable to extant species G. glycymeris (~100 years) and were used to reconstruct regional SST and a spectral analysis of past NAO. Oxygen isotope values were consistent with previous bivalve studies. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would most like to thank Dr. Donna Surge for allowing me to create this project. Without her, I would not have gained so many valuable experiences. I am truly grateful to Dr. Jay Burnett of NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center, who generously donated me the Jeep Cherokee full of live collected Spisula and Arctica and answered all my questions on shell aging. I would like to extend my great thanks to my committee members, Dr. John M. Bane, Jr., Dr. Larry Benninger, Dr. Joseph G. Carter, and Dr. Jonathan Lees for their advice. Thank you Surge Lab: Ann Goewert, Jose Rafa Garcia March, Ting Wang and Ian Winklestern. Lastly, I must thank my family for their endless love and encouragement. This is especially true for my sweet and beautiful wife Melissa and my mother Janice Edgerson who proofread early drafts even though she claims to know nothing about geology. v TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... VII LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ X LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ............................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE, DISSERTATION ORGANIZATION . 10 1.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 10 1.2 RESEARCH PURPOSE ................................................................................................. 14 1.3 DISSERTATION ORGANIZATION ................................................................................... 15 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... 23 2.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................... 23 2.2 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Physical Geographic Setting............................................................................ 25 2.2.2 Sedimentology .................................................................................................. 31 2.2.3 Oceanographic Setting..................................................................................... 32 2.2.4 Geologic Setting and Stratigraphy................................................................... 36 2.2.5 Sclerochronology ............................................................................................. 37 vii 2.3. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 42 CHAPTER 3: ADDRESSING THE SINGLE COUNTER PROBLEM USING A COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMAGE AGING METHOD .............................................. 57 3.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 58 3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................ 60 3.2.1 Materials .......................................................................................................... 60 3.2.2 Visual aging method ........................................................................................ 62 3.2.3 Computer-assisted aging ................................................................................. 63 3.2.4 Comparison of aging methods ......................................................................... 65 3.3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 66 3.3.1 Visual aging ..................................................................................................... 66 3.3.2 Computer-assisted aging ................................................................................. 66 3.3.3 Comparison of aging methods ......................................................................... 67 3.3.4 Other Bivalve Proxy Results ............................................................................ 68 3.4 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... 69 3.5. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 70 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... 71 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 72 CHAPTER 4: COMPARATIVE SCLEROHRONOLOGY OF MODERN AND MID-PLIOENE SURF CLAM (MACTRIDAE) ALONG THE WESTERN MID- ATLANTIC: THE ARCHETYPE REVISITED.......................................................... 79 4.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 80 vii 4.1.1 ECOLOGY OF MODERN ATLANTIC SURF CLAM ....................................................... 83 4.1.2 MODERN LOCATION .............................................................................................. 85 4.1.3 GEOLOGIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 87 4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................. 88 4.2.1 COLLECTION AND GROWTH INCREMENTS .............................................................. 88 4.2.2 STABLE ISOTOPES .................................................................................................. 93 4.3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................. 97 4.3.1 SHELL AGES AND GROWTH PARAMETERS ............................................................. 97 4.3.2 VARIATIONS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Histopathology of Antique Ark's Mantle (Anadara Antiquata) Post
    The histopathology of antique ark’s mantle (Anadara antiquata) post-depuration with the shells’ filtration Nabila A. Putri, Laksmi Sulmartiwi, Kustiawan T. Pursetyo Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Universitas Airlangga, 60115, Surabaya, Indonesia. Corresponding author: L. Sulmartiwi, [email protected] Abstract. Cockles are marine organisms which have the character of filter feeders so that heavy metals can be neutralized naturally through their shells. However, not all heavy metals can be neutralized, so depuration needs to be done. After depuration, histopathological analysis is needed to determine the condition of the soft tissue of the shells so that the disease can be diagnosed through structural changes that occur in the organs that are the main target of pollutants. This study aims to determine the histopathology of antique ark’s mantle (Anadara antiquata) after post-depuration with the filtration of the cockles’ shells. This research method applies an experimental method with scoring histological damage to antique ark’s mantle that ranges from 0 to 3, depending on the level and extent of the changes that occur. After that, the distribution of normal and non-homogeneous data was obtained, and then the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was conducted. The main parameter is the histopathology of the antique ark’s mantle. Supporting parameters include water quality, namely temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, salinity, levels of heavy metals Pb and Cd, total suspended solid (TSS) and total dissolved solid (TDS). The results of the Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis shows no significant difference between treatments P0 (Control), P1 (Filter 25%), P2 (Filter 50%), P3 (Filter 75%), and P4 (Filter 100%).
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Geoducks—A Compendium
    34, NUMBER 1 VOLUME JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH Vol. 34, No. 1 APRIL 2015 JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH CONTENTS VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 APRIL 2015 Geoducks — A compendium ...................................................................... 1 Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan P. Davis .......................................................................................... 3 Paul E. Gribben and Kevin G. Heasman Developing fisheries and aquaculture industries for Panopea zelandica in New Zealand ............................... 5 Ignacio Leyva-Valencia, Pedro Cruz-Hernandez, Sergio T. Alvarez-Castaneda,~ Delia I. Rojas-Posadas, Miguel M. Correa-Ramırez, Brent Vadopalas and Daniel B. Lluch-Cota Phylogeny and phylogeography of the geoduck Panopea (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) ..................................... 11 J. Jesus Bautista-Romero, Sergio Scarry Gonzalez-Pel aez, Enrique Morales-Bojorquez, Jose Angel Hidalgo-de-la-Toba and Daniel Bernardo Lluch-Cota Sinusoidal function modeling applied to age validation of geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa ................. 21 Brent Vadopalas, Jonathan P. Davis and Carolyn S. Friedman Maturation, spawning, and fecundity of the farmed Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa in Puget Sound, Washington ............ 31 Bianca Arney, Wenshan Liu, Ian Forster, R. Scott McKinley and Christopher M. Pearce Temperature and food-ration optimization in the hatchery culture of juveniles of the Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa ......... 39 Alejandra Ferreira-Arrieta, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Marco A. Gonzalez-G omez and Enrique Valenzuela-Espinoza Growth, survival, and feeding rates for the geoduck Panopea globosa during larval development ......................... 55 Sandra Tapia-Morales, Zaul Garcıa-Esquivel, Brent Vadopalas and Jonathan Davis Growth and burrowing rates of juvenile geoducks Panopea generosa and Panopea globosa under laboratory conditions .......... 63 Fabiola G. Arcos-Ortega, Santiago J. Sanchez Leon–Hing, Carmen Rodriguez-Jaramillo, Mario A.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Classification – Using Family Plates
    Shell Classification USING FAMILY PLATES YEAR SEVEN STUDENTS Introduction In the following activity you and your class can use the same techniques as Queensland Museum The Queensland Museum Network has about scientists to classify organisms. 2.5 million biological specimens, and these items form the Biodiversity collections. Most specimens are from Activity: Identifying Queensland shells by family. Queensland’s terrestrial and marine provinces, but These 20 plates show common Queensland shells some are from adjacent Indo-Pacific regions. A smaller from 38 different families, and can be used for a range number of exotic species have also been acquired for of activities both in and outside the classroom. comparative purposes. The collection steadily grows Possible uses of this resource include: as our inventory of the region’s natural resources becomes more comprehensive. • students finding shells and identifying what family they belong to This collection helps scientists: • students determining what features shells in each • identify and name species family share • understand biodiversity in Australia and around • students comparing families to see how they differ. the world All shells shown on the following plates are from the • study evolution, connectivity and dispersal Queensland Museum Biodiversity Collection. throughout the Indo-Pacific • keep track of invasive and exotic species. Many of the scientists who work at the Museum specialise in taxonomy, the science of describing and naming species. In fact, Queensland Museum scientists
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Defined Research Priorities
    Journal Pre-proof Fundamental questions and applications of sclerochronology: Community-defined research priorities Tamara Trofimova, Stella J. Alexandroff, Madelyn Mette, Elizabeth Tray, Paul G. Butler, Steven Campana, Elizabeth Harper, Andrew L.A. Johnson, John R. Morrongiello, Melita Peharda, Bernd R. Schöne, Carin Andersson, C. Fred T. Andrus, Bryan A. Black, Meghan Burchell, Michael L. Carroll, Kristine L. DeLong, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Peter Grønkjær, Daniel Killam, Amy L. Prendergast, David J. Reynolds, James D. Scourse, Kotaro Shirai, Julien Thébault, Clive Trueman, Niels de Winter PII: S0272-7714(20)30708-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106977 Reference: YECSS 106977 To appear in: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science Received Date: 1 February 2020 Revised Date: 15 July 2020 Accepted Date: 4 August 2020 Please cite this article as: Trofimova, T., Alexandroff, S.J., Mette, M., Tray, E., Butler, P.G., Campana, S., Harper, E., Johnson, A.L.A., Morrongiello, J.R., Peharda, M., Schöne, B.R., Andersson, C., Andrus, C.F.T., Black, B.A., Burchell, M., Carroll, M.L., DeLong, K.L., Gillanders, B.M., Grønkjær, P., Killam, D., Prendergast, A.L., Reynolds, D.J., Scourse, J.D., Shirai, K., Thébault, J., Trueman, C., de Winter, N., Fundamental questions and applications of sclerochronology: Community-defined research priorities, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106977. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding, Anatomy and Digestive Enzymes of False Limpet Siphonaria Guamensis
    World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences 5 (1): 104-109, 2013 ISSN 2078-4589 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wjfms.2013.05.01.66144 Feeding, Anatomy and Digestive Enzymes of False Limpet Siphonaria guamensis K.V.R. Murty, A. Shameem and K. Umadevi Department of Marine Living Resources Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, A.P., India Abstract: Very little information has been available in the literature on the feeding habits, anatomy and histology of digestive system of siphonariid limpets. The present study revealed Siphonaria guamensis feeds on the crustose red alga Hildenbrandia prototypus browsing on the rocks by rasping action of radula. The anatomy of digestive system of Siphonaria guamensis is similar with that of the other siphonariid limpets but the length of gut and colon are shorter than the patellogastropod limpets like Cellana radiata, patella vulgata, Fissurella barbadensis and species of Acmaea. The salivary glands are the main source of the enzyme system of Siphonaria guamensis. They contained enzymes which can act on carbohydrates, proteins and polysaccharides. The enzyme which can act on proteins was found only in salivary glands and not detected in any other part of the digestive system. No lypolytic activity was seen in any part of the digestive system of the animal. Key words: False Limpet Feeding Anatomy Digestive Enzymes INTRODUCTION tridentatum and C. minimum, where he described the morphology and histology of the digestive system at Little work has been done on the feeding, digestion length. anatomy and histology of the digestive organs of limpets Very little information has been available in the with an exception of patella vulgata (Davies and Fleure literature on the feeding methods, anatomy and histology [1], Graham [2], Stone and Morton [3], Fretter and Graham of the digestive system of siphonariid limpets.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoology Department, University of Cape Town. Patella Vulgata and P. Aspersa Are Attacked by Haematopus Ostralegus, P. Aspersa Be
    THE RESPONSES OF SOUTH AFRICAN PATELLID LIMPETS TO INVERTEBRATE PREDATORS G M BRANCH Zoology Department, University of Cape Town. Accepted: February 1978 ABSTRACT The starfISh Marthasterias glacialis is a generalized predator, feeding particularly on Choromytillis meridiOflalis, but also on several limpets, notably Patella longicosta. T1Iais d"bia (Gastropoda) feeds mainly on barnacles, mussels, and Patella gran"laris. The gastropods BumUJH!na delalandii and B. cincta are principally scavengers, feeding on damaged or dead animals. The responses of Patella spp. to these predators are described. P. gran"laris. P. concolor. P. compressa and P. miniata all retreat rapidly on contact. Small P. grallQtina and P. oculus respond similarly, but larger specimens react aggressively, smashing their shells downwards and often damaging the predator. The territorial species (P.longicosta. P. coch/ear and P. tablilaris) all retreat to their scan and remain clamped there. P. argenvillei and P. tablilaris are usually unresponsive, possibly because they are too large to fall prey. Cellana capensis rolls its mantle upwards to cover the shell, preventing predators from attaching. The responses and their effectiveness are discussed in relation to other behavioural patterns displayed by limpets. There is no correlation between the intensity of a prey's response to a predator and the degree of contact . ) 0 between the two in the field. 1 0 2 d e INTRODUCTION t a d A variety of limpet predators has been recorded. Several birds attack limpets by knocking ( r them off the rock, and either picking out the flesh or consuming the whole limpet and e h s regurgitating the shell: oyster catchers (Haemlltopus spp.), various gulls (LaTUS spp.) and the i l b u sheathbill (Chionus alba) (Test 1945; Feare 1971; Walker 1972).
    [Show full text]
  • Zhang Et Al., 2015
    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 153 (2015) 38e53 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecss Modeling larval connectivity of the Atlantic surfclams within the Middle Atlantic Bight: Model development, larval dispersal and metapopulation connectivity * Xinzhong Zhang a, , Dale Haidvogel a, Daphne Munroe b, Eric N. Powell c, John Klinck d, Roger Mann e, Frederic S. Castruccio a, 1 a Institute of Marine and Coastal Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA b Haskin Shellfish Research Laboratory, Rutgers University, Port Norris, NJ 08349, USA c Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, MS 39564, USA d Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA e Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062, USA article info abstract Article history: To study the primary larval transport pathways and inter-population connectivity patterns of the Atlantic Received 19 February 2014 surfclam, Spisula solidissima, a coupled modeling system combining a physical circulation model of the Accepted 30 November 2014 Middle Atlantic Bight (MAB), Georges Bank (GBK) and the Gulf of Maine (GoM), and an individual-based Available online 10 December 2014 surfclam larval model was implemented, validated and applied. Model validation shows that the model can reproduce the observed physical circulation patterns and surface and bottom water temperature, and Keywords: recreates the observed distributions of surfclam larvae during upwelling and downwelling events. The surfclam (Spisula solidissima) model results show a typical along-shore connectivity pattern from the northeast to the southwest individual-based model larval transport among the surfclam populations distributed from Georges Bank west and south along the MAB shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoduck Aquaculture Research Program (GARP)
    FINAL REPORT Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Washington Sea Grant website at wsg.washington.edu/geoduck For more information contact: Washington Sea Grant University of Washington 3716 Brooklyn Ave. N.E. Box 355060 Seattle, WA 98105-6716 206.543.6600 wsg.washington.edu [email protected] November 2013 • WSG-TR 13-03 Acknowledgements ashington Sea Grant expresses its appreciation to the many individuals who provided information and support Wfor this report. In particular, we gratefully acknowledge research program funding provided by the Washington State Legislature, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Department of Ecology, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and University of Washington. We also would like to thank shellfish growers who cooperated with program investigators to make this research possible. Finally, we would like to recognize the guidance provided by the Department of Ecology and the Shellfish Aquaculture Regulatory Committee. Primary Investigators/ Contributing Scientists Washington Sea Grant Staff Recommended Citation Report Authors Jeffrey C. Cornwell David Armstrong Penelope Dalton Washington Sea Grant Carolyn S. Friedman Lisa M. Crosson Marcus Duke (2013) Final Report: P. Sean McDonald Jonathan Davis David G. Gordon Geoduck aquaculture Jennifer Ruesink Elene M. Dorfmeier Teri King research program. Report Brent Vadopalas Tim Essington Meg Matthews to the Washington State Glenn R. VanBlaricom Paul Frelier Robyn Ricks Legislature. Washington Aaron W. E. Galloway Eric Scigliano Sea Grant Technical Report Micah J. Horwith Raechel Waters WSG-TR 13-03, 122 pp. Perry Lund Dan Williams Kate McPeek Roger I. E. Newell Julian D. Olden Michael S. Owens Jennifer L. Price Kristina M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jocelyn A. Sessa
    Jocelyn A. Sessa Current: Assistant Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology, Academy of Natural Sciences, & Assistant Professor, Department of Biodiversity, Earth & Environmental Science of Drexel University. Past Positions: 2016 to 2017 Senior Scientist in Paleontology & Education, American Museum of Natural History. Postdoctoral Fellowships: 2012 to 2016 Departments of Paleontology & Education, American Museum of Natural History. 2010 to 2012 Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. 2009 to 2010 Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University. Education: Ph.D., 2009 Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. M.S., 2003 Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. B.A., 2000 Department of Geological Sciences, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY. Cum laude, minor in Environmental Studies. Publications (* indicates student author; for student work, ‡ indicates corresponding author): Buczek, A.J.*, Hendy, A., Hopkins, M. Sessa, J.A.‡ 2020. On the reconciliation of biostratigraphy and strontium isotope stratigraphy of three southern Californian Plio-Pleistocene formations. Geological Society of America Bulletin 132 ; doi.org/10.1130/B35488.1. Oakes, R.L., Sessa, J.A. 2020. Determining how biotic and abiotic variables affect the shell condition and parameters of Heliconoides inflatus pteropods from a sediment trap in the Cariaco Basin. Biogeosciences 17:1975–1990; doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1975-2020. Oakes, R.L., Hill Chase, M., Siddall, M.E., Sessa, J.A. 2020. Testing the impact of two key scan parameters on the quality and repeatability of measurements from CT scan data. Palaeontologia Electronica 23(1):a07; doi.org/10.26879/942. Ferguson, K.*, MacLeod, K.G.‡, Landman, N.H., Sessa, J.A.‡ 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Ponderous Ark Aquaculture in Florida
    The Potential of Blood Ark and Ponderous Ark Aquaculture in Florida Results of Spawning, Larval Rearing, Nursery and Growout Trials Leslie N. Sturmer, Jose M. Nuñez, R. LeRoy Creswell, and Shirley M. Baker TP-169 SEPTEMBER 2009 Cover illustration: Ann Meyers This research was supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under USDA Special Research Grant No. 2002-3445-11946; and by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration (NOAA) under NOAA Grant No. NA06 OAR-4170014. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of these organizations. Additional copies are available by contacting: Shellfish Aquaculture Extension Program Florida Sea Grant University of Florida University of Florida PO Box 89 PO Box 110409 Cedar Key, FL 32625-0089 Gainesville, FL 32622-0409 (352)543-5057 (352) 392-2801 www.flseagrant.org TP 169 September 2009 The Potential of Blood Ark (Anadara ovalis) and Ponderous Ark (Noetia ponderosa) Aquaculture in Florida Results of Spawning, Larval Rearing, Nursery, and Growout Trials Leslie N. Sturmer Shellfish Aquaculture Extension Program Cooperative Extension Service Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Cedar Key Jose M. Nuñez The Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience University of Florida St. Augustine R. LeRoy Creswell Florida Sea Grant College Program Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Fort Pierce Shirley M. Baker Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program School of Forest Resources and Conservation Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida Gainesville September 2009 TP 169 ii Preface In November 1999, a workshop on New Molluscs for Aquaculture was conducted by the University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Florida Sea Grant, and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF FISHING IMPACTS ON HABITAT - SEPTEMBER 2003 UPDATE Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission SEPTEMBER 2003 GSMFC No.: 115 Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update Edited by Jeffrey K. Rester Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission September 2003 Introduction This is the third in a series of updates to the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat originally produced in February 2000. The Commission’s Habitat Subcommittee felt that the gathering of pertinent literature should continue. The third update contains 52 new articles since the publication of the last update. The update uses the same criteria that the original bibliography and first and second updates used to compile articles. It attempts to compile a listing of papers and reports that address the many effects and impacts that fishing can have on habitat and the marine environment. The bibliography is not limited to scientific literature only. It includes technical reports, state and federal agency reports, college theses, conference and meeting proceedings, popular articles, and other forms of nonscientific literature. This was done in an attempt to gather as much information on fishing impacts as possible. Researchers will be able to decide for themselves whether they feel the included information is valuable. Fishing, both recreational and commercial, can have many varying impacts on habitat and the marine environment. Whether a fisher prop scars seagrass, drops an anchor on a coral reef, or drags a trawl across the bottom, each act can alter habitat and affect fish populations.
    [Show full text]