Turkmenistan Diagnostic by Hans Holzhacker and Dana Skakova
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Turkmenistan Diagnostic By Hans Holzhacker and Dana Skakova May 2019 Contact persons: Hans Holzhacker (Lead Economist, Central Asia), Dana Skakova (Analyst, Central Asia. Country diagnostics are an EBRD tool to identify the main obstacles to entrepreneurship and private sector development and to help shape the Bank’s strategic priorities and project selection in new country strategies. Each diagnostic informs the EBRD’s policy engagement with the authorities in the country. Each country diagnostic assesses the progress and challenges of the country of operations in developing a sustainable market economy. Private sector development and entrepreneurship are at the heart of the Bank’s mandate in the regions of operation of the bank, but the private sector in all EBRD countries faces a range of problems and obstacles. The diagnostic highlights the key challenges facing private companies and shows where each country stands vis-à-vis its peers in terms of six qualities of transition – competitive, well- governed, resilient, integrated, green, and inclusive – and points out the main deficiencies and gaps in each quality. The diagnostics draw on a range of methodologies and best practice for assessing how big different obstacles are. Extensive use is made of in-house expertise across the EBRD, along with surveys such as the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS) and the Life in Transition Survey (LiTS), as well as other cross-country surveys and reports from institutions such as the World Bank, World Economic Forum and OECD. For some larger countries, the diagnostics also draw on specially commissioned studies of selected issues that are critical for private sector development in the country. The diagnostics are led by the EBRD’s Country Economics and Policy team, drawing substantially on the expertise of sector, governance and political experts in the Economics, Policy and Governance department (EPG) and consulting widely with relevant experts across the EBRD when preparing the final product. The diagnostics are shared with the EBRD Board during the country strategy process and published during the public consultation period. The views expressed in the diagnostic papers are those of the authors only and not of the EBRD. For more information, go to: https://www.ebrd.com/publications/country-diagnostics Or : www.countrydiagnostics.com Turkmenistan Diagnostic May 2019 Contact persons: Hans Holzhacker (Lead Economist, Central Asia), Dana Skakova (Analyst, Central Asia). Executive summary This paper assesses the progress in Turkmenistan The report also presents scores for the six towards a well-functioning, sustainable market desirable qualities of a sustainable market economy, and the challenges ahead. It provides a economy – competitive, well-governed, basis for the design of the forthcoming EBRD Country green, inclusive, resilient and integrated – Strategy for Turkmenistan and for the structure and and a description of the main transition gaps, prioritisation of ongoing and future investment which are among the largest in EBRD activities and policy advice/advocacy in the country. countries of operations. Private sector activity remains severely limited in Turkmenistan despite a range of government programmes and new legislation aimed at increasing its role. The report finds that the main obstacles holding back private sector development are the challenging business climate resulting from heavy state presence in the economy, weak property rights, and in many cases state-directed - instead of market-based - access to resources required for conducting business. Other major obstacles are: Rationing and slow conversion of local currency into foreign exchange because of the fixed, overvalued exchange rate, which weighs both on current businesses and on foreign investment. Lack of reliable data, which complicates policy-making by officials and investment choices by businesses. Turkmenistan Diagnostic May 2019 │ 5 1. The Private Sector: Size and Structure Enhancing the role of the private sector has been Table 1: Active non-state businesses in 20162 declared a priority in the country’s development programmes. A target has been set of 70 per cent of Type Number per cent non-gas GDP to be produced by the private sector by Micro-enterprises 6,505 80.1 2020, excluding the hydrocarbon sector. Officials estimate that some 68 per cent has been reached Small enterprises 890 11.0 already. However, the lack of reliable data makes it Medium enterprises 634 7.8 difficult to pin down what share of GDP the private Large enterprises 88 1.1 sector actually produces. Total enterprises 8,117 100.0 Private sector activity remains limited in Individual entrepreneurs 76, 317 Turkmenistan. According to official data, revenues of Foreign enterprises 581 all types of non-state businesses accounted for some Joint ventures 62 60 per cent of GDP in 2017. However, the true share of GDP produced by the private sector is believed to be well below this figure, for the following reasons: Source: State Statistics Committee of Turkmenistan. first, state-ownership is defined as a 100 per cent state share in equity, and therefore activities of firms Table 2: Non-state sector revenues and employment with even a small privately-owned share would count 2016 as “non-state”; and second, the official calculations by the State Committee of Turkmenistan for Employment, Revenue, Revenue, Statistics show revenues, not value added.1 thousand billion per cent persons manat of GDP3 A privatization programme has been in place for Domestic non- 124 19.2 15.2 several years. In December 2013, Turkmenistan state adopted the Law on the Denationalization and enterprises Individual 76 19.6 15.5 Privatization of State Property, which took effect in entrepreneurs July 2014. Since then, some 400 non-strategic Foreign 81 38.2 30.2 enterprises have been privatised. Privatisation companies tenders are regularly published in the local media. Total 279 77.0 60.9 The energy sector, however, is not being considered for privatisation and the government has stated its Source: State Statistics Committee of Turkmenistan. intention to keep it this way for the time being. At the same time, energy sector companies were reported While private sector development is progressing to to absorb up to 70 per cent of the funds available some extent, the number of private companies as from state programmes. well as their share in employment and GDP has remained low. There were over 8,000 domestic non- state enterprises active in 2016 (see Table 1). They employed 124,000 persons and had revenues4 equivalent to 15.2 per cent of GDP (see Table 2). Most of them were active in agriculture, construction 1 If one assumes that value added is roughly 70 per cent of revenues, the non-state sector would account for some 40 per cent of GDP, or some 60 per cent of non- energy GDP, on the assumption that energy accounts for about one-quarter of GDP. This would be roughly in line with statements of officials. However, probably 2 There are 2017 enterprise data published in the 2018 Statistical Yearbook of the assumptions both of 70 per cent value added share and 25 per cent energy in Turkmenistan; however data allowing combining the number of enterprises, GDP share are too high. If state-ownership is defined as an above 25 per cent employment and revenue are only up to 2016 available. state share in equity, and if calculated at more reasonable assumptions for the 3 GDP was 126.6 billion manat in 2016, US$ 36.2 billion according to the official ratio of value added to revenues, the share of the private sector in GDP would be exchange rate. substantially lower than official figures suggest. 4 There are no value added data been published, only revenue data. 6 │ Turkmenistan Diagnostic May 2019 and manufacturing. About 80 per cent were micro- enterprises5, and 11 per cent small enterprises. There were also some 76,000 individual entrepreneurs active in 2016, which had revenues equivalent to 15.5 per cent of GDP. About 79 per cent of these were engaged in trade, 7 per cent in transportation, and 6 per cent in real estate activities. In other countries of the region the number of non-state enterprises is several times higher.6 The number of foreign companies has remained limited as well, but they provide a significant share of investment, particularly in the mining sector (including oil and gas). There were 581 foreign companies and 62 joint ventures active in 2016 with revenues of about 30 per cent of GDP. Revenues per employee were more than twice as high in foreign as in domestic companies. Two-thirds of revenues were generated in construction, and much of the rest in mining. Foreign companies and joint ventures employed together 93,700 people in 2016, of which 75 per cent were employed in construction and another 17 per cent in mining. Investments by foreign enterprises amounted to almost 5 per cent of GDP (6.2 billion manat) in 2016, albeit substantially lower than the almost 9 per cent of GDP (10.8 billion manat) in 2015.7 Of these investments, 82 per cent went to the mining sector in 2016. 5 Micro-enterprises are defined as employing up to 15 persons in industry, construction, electricity, gas, water and up to 10 persons in other industries; small enterprises 16-50 persons in industry, construction, electricity, gas, water and 11- 25 persons in other industries; medium enterprises 51-200 persons in industry, construction, electricity, gas, water and 26-100 persons in other industries; large enterprises more than 200 persons in industry, construction, electricity, gas, water more than 100 persons in other industries 6 For comparison: There were 256 thousand domestic non-state enterprises in Kazakhstan and over one million individual entrepreneurs. The number of foreign companies was about 23 thousand, the number of joint ventures 11 thousand.