Northeast Trail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Northeast Trail June 25, 2019 @atlantabeltline @atlantabeltline @atlantabeltline PROGRAM ELEMENTS Vision: To be the catalyst for making Atlanta a global beacon for equitable, inclusive, and sustainable city life. Northeast Trail Tonight’s Band https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Teeth_and_The_Electric_Mayhem#/media/File:The_Electric_Mayhem.jpg We are here… Northeast Trail: Project Overview Limits: • Monroe Drive to MARTA Lindbergh Tasks: • Alternatives Analysis • Concept Validation • Locally Preferred Alt • Engineering and Design Still Here! • Construction Documents Northeast Trail: GPC Hairpin Line Limits: • Ansley Mall to Buford Highway Tasks: • Pole Work Complete • Line Work Complete • Grading, Storm Water, Walls, Paving, and Grassing forthcoming • Access Point at Montgomery Ferry Road Northeast Trail: ABI Follow-On Limits: • Mayson Street to Westminster Drive Tasks: • Lighting • Landscaping • Connections – Westminster Dr – Piedmont Ave – Mayson St Results: • Full BeltLine Trail Implementation Northeast Trail – Tonight’s Focal Area Future System Interactions… • Northeast Trail • Northeast Transit • Northside Trail • Northside Transit • MARTA Armour Station • Clifton Corridor LRT These are all “defined by placeholders.” Northeast Trail Systems Interactions… • Northeast Trail cannot preclude any viable alternatives along any potential Northside BeltLine Corridor Northeast Trail Connect with Existing System • MARTA Red/Gold Lines • PATH400 • Cheshire Farm Trail • Confluence Trail Consider Future Network Connections Northeast Trail Physical Constraints… • I-85/Buford Hwy • MARTA Red/Gold Line • MARTA Armour Yard • Norfolk Southern Rail • CSX Rail • Peachtree Creek • Brookwood Hills Conservation Easement • Armour Drive – Under Buford Hwy – Under MARTA/NSR Northeast Trail How Did We Move This Forward? 1. Identified Alternatives 2. Developed Performance Measures 3. Analyzed Alternatives 4. Considered Existing Systems Impacts 5. Considered Possible Future Infrastructure 6. Simplified… Northeast Trail Alternatives… 1. Segment Identification 2. Chained Segments 3. How Can We Simplify? 4. Transit Governs 5. If…Then… 6. Simplified. Northeast Trail Alternatives… 1. Segment Identification 2. Chained Segments 3. How Can We Simplify? 4. Transit Governs 5. If…Then… 6. Simplified. Northeast Trail Decision Point 1. Wye Bridges over Buford Highway 2. If Transit on one, then Trail on the other Northeast Trail Decision Point 1. Wye Bridges over Buford Highway 2. If Transit on one, then Trail on the other Northeast Trail Results: Universe 42 Alternatives 5 Alternatives 3 on south Wye 2 on north Wye Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Northeast Trail Open House… • Ask Questions and Provide Feedback on the Alignments Carried Forward Thank you! Beltline.org/engage // [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Southside Trail Design July 12, 2016
// Southwest + Southeast Study Group: Southside Trail Design July 12, 2016 7/12/2016 Page 1 // Trails: Southside Corridor • Includes 4-mile trail between University Ave & Glenwood Ave • Design to include lighting, retaining walls, vertical connections, storm drainage, signage/wayfinding, and bridges • Federally Funded Project, following GDOT Design Process • Design to be complete in 18-24 months followed by construction 7/12/2016 Page 2 MECHANICSVILLE LEGEND EDY PUBLIC LIBRARY I - 20 NODE OPTIONS ENN FULTON WAY GLENWOOD AVE SE WAY DUNBAR GLENWOOD ELEMENTARY PARK L K VERTICAL CONNECTION SCHOOL BILL KENNEDY BILL KENNEDY BIL ROSA L BURNEY SOUTHSIDE TRAIL AT GRADE PARK HERITAGE PARK MAYNARDD CONNECTION TO ATLANTA JACKSON BELTLINE COORIDOR H.S. PHOENIX III PARK|SCHOOL|LIBRARY| PARK WINDSOR GREENSPACE STREET GRANT PARK MERCER ST SE KILLIANKKILLIKILLKIL IANAN TO FOCUS AREA PHOENIX II PARK PARKSIDEARKSIDE ELEMENELEMENTARYTA ORMEWORMEORMEWOODRMEWWOODODOD PARK SCHOOL BROWN ORMEWOODWOOD AVEE MIDDLE WELCH ORMEWOODOORORMEWOOMEWOOD SCHOOL STREET PARK PARKPARK ROSE CIRCLE ADAIR DELMAR AVE SESE DELMARDELMDEDELLMAMAR PARK PARK II ORMOND AVEAVENUEENUENUNUE CHARLES L GRANT GIDEONS PARK ELEMENTARY VARD SE SCHOOL GGRANTRANT PPARKARK PPEOPLESEOPLES TTOWNOWN SE AVE CHEROKEE BOULEVARD SE BOULEVARD PITMAN SE BOULEVARD LEE ST AADAIRDAIR D.H. STANTON PARK E CCONFEDERATECONFEDE AVE SE I - 75 ELEMENTARY O PPARKARK PPITTSBURGHITTSBURGH SCHOOL RAATE AVE SE OOAKLANDAKLAND FOUR D.H. STANTON CORNERS WALTER LEONARD PARK PARK HILL ST SE CCITYITY ADAIR PARKS MIDDLE PARK I JACCIJAC FULLER ALLENE AVE SW ALLENE AVE SCHOOL WOODLAND GARDEN BBOULEVARDOULEVARD PARK METROPOLITAN PKWY METROPOLITAN BOULEVARD HANK AARON DR SE HANK AARON CCHOSEWOODHOSEWOOD HHEIGHTSEIGHTS CARVER D.H. CROSSING SCHOOLS FINCH UNIVERSITY AVE MILTONSTANTON AVE SE PPARKARK PARK ELEMENTARY TO PARK SCHOOL MCDONOUGH BLVDO SE EENGLEWOODNGLEWOOD THE REV.
[Show full text]
Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
[Show full text]
The Atlanta Beltline: Creating a TOD Real Estate Market Pre-Transit
//The Atlanta BeltLine: Creating a TOD Real Estate Market Pre-Transit NACTO 2012 Designing Cities Conference 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 1 // Context The Atlanta BeltLine connects the heart of the region and utilizes historic freight rail ROW circling the city: • Located inside the I-285 loop highway • Connects 45 neighborhoods ringing the CBD • 22% of City of Atlanta population and 19% of city land mass within ½ mile of corridor 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 2 // HistoryThe Project + Context Elements Providing the Region with Needed Connectivity •Economic Development •Transit •Brownfield cleanup •Affordable housing •Parks •Trails 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 3 //The Project Elements Transit Parks Trails Jobs & Economic 22-mile loop 1300 + new acres, 33 miles Development 40% increase 20 areas, 30k jobs 6,500 acre TAD Affordable & Existing Public Art & Environmental Workforce Communities & Streetscapes Clean-up Housing Historic 1100 + acres Preservation 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 4 // Case Study for Urban TOD Historic Fourth Ward / Poncey Highlands Redevelopment Historic Fourth Ward Park Site The old Sears Distribution Center next to the Atlanta BeltLine and lots of parking 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 5 // Historic Fourth Ward & Poncey Highlands Existing Conditions “Buttermilk Bottom” Confluence of 3 watersheds Described by The Atlanta Journal Constitution as … “A barren expanse of cracked concrete, weeds, and towering trees surviving against a background of neglect.” 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 6 // The Planning Process Led to Projects Atlanta BeltLine Master Plan Promote improved connectivity Promote denser development Promote improved livability 10/23/2012 Confidential // Atlanta BeltLine // © 2012 Page 7 // The Planning Process Led to Projects Historic Fourth Ward Park Vision and Construction 1 2 3 1.
[Show full text]
Citywide Conversation
Citywide Conversation Transit Routing Options and MARTA Connectivity Assessments Atlanta BeltLine West Citywide Conversation October 30, 2014 10/30/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 1 Citywide Conversation • Open House • Welcome and Introductions • Today’s Agenda: . Schedule . Project Background . Screening Process and Results • Questions and Discussion • Adjourn 10/30/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 2 Community Engagement Schedule Summer and Fall 2014 We are here are We Study Group Study Group SAC Kickoff Citywide SAC/TAC Citywide Meetings Meetings Meeting Conversation Meetings Conversation Round #1 Round #2 Sept 22 & 25, Oct 6 & 9, Sept 9, 2014 Sept 15, 2014 Oct 14, 2014 2014 2014 Oct 30, 2014 Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC): Advisory committee for Study Groups: Residents and business owners with an each project corridor representing business and property interest in the project within each geographical area. owners, adjacent neighborhoods, and community groups. Citywide Conversations: Citywide public meetings are Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Advisory committee forums to educate the public at large with upcoming plans, comprised of representatives with technical and/or policies, and studies. environmental expertise. 10/30/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 3 Milestone Schedule We are here are We Transit Routing Technical Studies Complete Draft Public/Agency Finding of No Project Options/MARTA and Evaluation Environmental Review and Significant Development Connectivity Assessment (EA) Public Hearing Impact (FONSI)
[Show full text]
ATLANTA BELTLINE MASTER PLAN • July 18, 2011 SUBAREA 4 B
I. Executive Summary The recommendations of the Atlanta BeltLine To better defi ne streetscape, pedestrian and Master Plan for Subarea 4 are summarized in the roadway projects and associated cost estimates following pages. The recommendations include for high priority corridors necessary to support brief sections on land use, design, mobility, and future development as identifi ed in the parks. Complete recommendations follow this Redevelopment Plan and Street Framework section in the Plan Recommendations Report. Plan. To refi ne projects and programming related to parks and open spaces along the BeltLine. a. Study Overview The Atlanta BeltLine will combine greenspace, Upon completion of all Subarea Master Plans, trails, transit, and new development along 22 miles Atlanta BeltLine Inc. will develop a comprehensive of historic rail segments that encircle the core of Implementation Plan and budget for projects the city. It will connect 45 neighborhoods and identifi ed and prioritized in individual subareas. affect more than 100,000 people who live within This phased process will ensure a uniform one-half mile of the corridor. approach to implementing projects and an equitable distribution of development across all In 2005, the Atlanta City Council adopted the geographies of the Atlanta BeltLine over time BeltLine Redevelopment Plan. This important – regardless of the sequencing of Subarea Master planning document created a broad vision for the Plans. Atlanta BeltLine project and enabled the creation of the BeltLine Tax Allocation District (TAD), a key Master Plans by their nature are subject to source of implementation funds. The Subarea 4 periodic review and changes to refl ect changing Master Plan builds on the foundation of previous local conditions, refi ned neighborhood visions and planning efforts by refi ning recommendations city policies, demographic shifts, and other factors.
[Show full text]
Atlanta Beltline/Atlanta Streetcar West Transit Route Options and MARTA
Study Group Transit Routing Options and MARTA Connectivity Assessments Atlanta BeltLine West Westside Study Group: October 6, 2014 Southwest Study Group: October 9, 2014 10/6/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 1 Study Group • Welcome and Introductions • Today’s Agenda: . Schedule . Community Engagement Synthesis . Phase 1 Screening Results • Questions and Discussion • Adjourn 10/6/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 2 Community Engagement Schedule Summer and Fall 2014 We are here are We Study Group Study Group SAC Kickoff Citywide SAC/TAC Citywide Meetings Meetings Meeting Conversation Meetings Conversation Round #1 Round #2 Sept 22 & 25, Oct 6 & 9, Sept 9, 2014 Sept 15, 2014 Oct 14, 2014 2014 2014 Oct 30, 2014 Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC): Advisory committee for Study Groups: Residents and business owners with an each project corridor representing business and property interest in the project within each geographical area. owners, adjacent neighborhoods, and community groups. Citywide Conversations: Citywide public meetings are Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Advisory committee forums to educate the public at large with upcoming plans, comprised of representatives with technical and/or policies, and studies. environmental expertise. 10/6/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 3 Milestone Schedule We are here are We Transit Routing Technical Studies Complete Draft Public/Agency Finding of No Project Options/MARTA and Evaluation Environmental Review and Significant Development Connectivity Assessment (EA) Public Hearing Impact (FONSI) (PD) Entry Assessments Request June 2014 to September 2014 November 2014 to March 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 Summer 2015 10/6/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 4 Study Group Phase 1 Screening Results Atlanta BeltLine West 10/6/2014 Atlanta BeltLine // © 2014 Page 5 Screening Process Preliminary Evaluation Criteria • Five Guiding Principles .
[Show full text]
Atlanta Streetcar System Plan
FINAL REPORT | Atlanta BeltLine/ Atlanta Streetcar System Plan This page intentionally left blank. FINAL REPORT | Atlanta BeltLine/ Atlanta Streetcar System Plan Acknowledgements The Honorable Mayor Kasim Reed Atlanta City Council Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Staff Ceasar C. Mitchell, President Paul Morris, FASLA, PLA, President and Chief Executive Officer Carla Smith, District 1 Lisa Y. Gordon, CPA, Vice President and Chief Kwanza Hall, District 2 Operating Officer Ivory Lee Young, Jr., District 3 Nate Conable, AICP, Director of Transit and Cleta Winslow, District 4 Transportation Natalyn Mosby Archibong, District 5 Patrick Sweeney, AICP, LEED AP, PLA, Senior Project Alex Wan, District 6 Manager Transit and Transportation Howard Shook, District 7 Beth McMillan, Director of Community Engagement Yolanda Adrean, District 8 Lynnette Reid, Senior Community Planner Felicia A. Moore, District 9 James Alexander, Manager of Housing and C.T. Martin, District 10 Economic Development Keisha Lance Bottoms, District 11 City of Atlanta Staff Joyce Sheperd, District 12 Tom Weyandt, Senior Transportation Policy Advisor, Michael Julian Bond, Post 1 at Large Office of the Mayor Mary Norwood, Post 2 at Large James Shelby, Commissioner, Department of Andre Dickens, Post 3 at Large Planning & Community Development Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Board Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director of Planning, Department of Planning & Community The Honorable Kasim Reed, Mayor, City of Atlanta Development John Somerhalder, Chairman Joshuah Mello, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning Elizabeth B. Chandler, Vice Chair – Transportation, Department of Planning & Earnestine Garey, Secretary Community Development Cynthia Briscoe Brown, Atlanta Board of Education, Invest Atlanta District 8 At Large Brian McGowan, President and Chief Executive The Honorable Emma Darnell, Fulton County Board Officer of Commissioners, District 5 Amanda Rhein, Interim Managing Director of The Honorable Andre Dickens, Atlanta City Redevelopment Councilmember, Post 3 At Large R.
[Show full text]
Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
[Show full text]
MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta
MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta October 10, 2018 Jeffrey A. Parker | General Manager/CEO PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • More MARTA Atlanta Program / Approved Plan • State of Service • Ongoing Coordination Issues • Q & A 2 MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM / APPROVED PLAN MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM • Unanimous Approval by MARTA Board of Directors • $2.7 billion in sales tax over 40 years • Additional public/private funding to be sought • Targeted Investments: 22 Miles - Light Rail Transit (LRT) 14 Miles - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 26 Miles - Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) 2 New Transit Centers Additional Fixed-Route Bus Service Upgrades to existing Rail Stations • Two Years of Comprehensive Planning and Outreach • Nine Guiding Principles • Opportunities for more transit 4 THE PEOPLE’S PRIORITIES Based on public feedback, MARTA and City leaders refined the program, with emphasis on: Atlanta BeltLine Southeast/Southwest Station Enhancements $570M $600M+ $200M Plan builds out 61% of City‐adopted Includes LRT on Campbellton & SW Includes better access, amenities Atlanta BeltLine Streetcar Plan BeltLine and BRT link to downtown and ADA enhancements Clifton Corridor Downtown/Streetcar Bus System $250M $553M $238M Plus additional $100M contingent Connects BeltLine with downtown Includes more frequent bus on securing other local funding destinations and existing Streetcar service and new circulator routes 5 APPROVED PROGRAM 6 MORE MARTA Program MORE MARTA IMPLEMENTATION TO DATE • MARTA has already responded to public feedback. Since 2017, the
[Show full text]
Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019
DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................
[Show full text]
I-20 East Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Contents Tables The Adopted LPA 1 Table 1: Reasons for Selection of LPA 3 Refinements to the Recommended LPA 1 Table 2: Goals and Objectives 8 Proposed LPA Operations 4 Table 3: Tier 1Alternatives 8 Adoption of the LPA 4 Table 4: Tier 1 Screening Results 10 Project Description and Background 6 Table 5: Tier 2 Alternatives 11 FTA Project Development Process 6 Table 6: Cost and Performance Comparison of Tier 2 Alternatives 13 Purpose and Need 7 Table 7: Assumptions 13 Goals and Objectives 8 Table 8: Tier 2 Evaluation Matrix 14 Alternatives Evaluation Framework 8 Table 9: Public Involvement 15 Tier 1 Screening 8 Tier 2 Screening 11 Figures Stakeholder and Public Involvement 15 Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities to Implementing the LPA 16 Figure 1: Adopted LPA (HRT3) 1 Figure 2: Map of the Adopted LPA – HRT3 2 Figure 3: LPA Operation in MARTA System 4 Figure 4: System Integration Map 5 Figure 5: Study Area 6 Figure 6: Timeline of Previous Studies 6 Figure 7: FTA Project Development Process 7 Figure 8: The Alternatives Analysis Process 8 Figure 9: Tier 1 Alternatives 9 Figure 10: Transit Technologies Considered 11 Figure 11: Tier 2 Alternatives 12 1 I-20 East Locally Preferred Alternative Summary Report Following a two-tiered Detailed Corridor Analysis (DCA), which evaluated a FIGURE 1: ADOPTED LPA (HRT3) variety of transit alignments and modes, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) Authority (MARTA) I-20 East Transit Initiative has selected and refined a Locally Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Preferred Alternative (LPA).
[Show full text]
Atlanta Region's Plan RTP (2020) PROJECT FACT SHEET AR-411
AR-411 Atlanta Region's Plan RTP (2020) PROJECT FACT SHEET Short Title CLIFTON CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT - PHASE 1 FROM LINDBERGH MARTA STATION TO EMORY UNIVERSITY GDOT Project No. N/A Federal ID No. N/A Status Long Range Service Type Transit / Rail Capital Sponsor MARTA Jurisdiction Regional - Central Analysis Level In the Region's Air Quality Conformity Analysis Existing Thru Lane N/A LCI Network Year 2040 Planned Thru Lane N/A Flex Corridor Length 6 miles Detailed Description and Justification This project will construct light rail service along the Clifton Corridor from the Lindbergh MARTA station to the Emory University/CDC campus along existing rail corridors. This includes provisions for both heavy rail and light rail service to meet the complex travel patterns and needs within the service corridor as identified within the Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative - Alternatives Analysis (AA). The project includes construction of 6, possibly 7, light rail stations and 4.24 miles of bi-directional trackage and auxiliary infrastructure, as well as the provision of feeder and circulator bus service. This provides high capacity transit mobility options for residents and commuters traveling between Lindbergh Center, the Emory University Main Campus and Clairmont Campus and the Centers for Disease Control Roybal Campus. Further, the project will provide long distance travelers approaching the Clifton Corridor from points along the Gold line or Red line with rail service into the Emory/CDC complex, which serves the travel demand patterns as
[Show full text]