DOCSLIB.ORG

Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal an Analysis of Environment-Related Risk Exposure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal an Analysis of Environment-Related Risk Exposure Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal An analysis of environment-related risk exposure January 2016 Supported by: Authors: Ben Caldecott | Lucas Kruitwagen | Gerard Dericks | Daniel J. Tulloch | Irem Kok | James Mitchell ISBN: 978-0-9927618-2-0 2 Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure Table of Contents About the Stranded Assets Programme 5 Global Advisory Council 6 About the Authors 7 Acknowledgements 8 Executive Summary 9 Coal-Fired Power Utilities 11 Thermal Coal Miners 18 Coal Processing Technology Companies 21 Scenarios 24 Carbon Capture and Storage 24 Implications for Reporting And Disclosure 24 Company Data Intelligence Service 25 1 Introduction 27 1.1 Coal Value Chain 30 1.2 Scenario Development 32 1.3 Scenario Outlook 33 1.4 Data Availability 40 1.5 Dataset Preparation 41 1.6 ISIN Numbers 42 2 Briefing: Coal Processing Technologies 43 2.1 Technology Summary 43 2.2 Development 46 3 Briefing: Role of CCS 48 3.1 Feasibility Update 48 3.2 Scenario Inclusion 49 3.3 Deployment Update 50 3.4 CCS in the Coal Value Chain 50 3.5 Policy and Legal Developments 51 3.6 Emerging Issues 51 3.7 Opinion 52 4 Policy Summaries 54 4.1 Australia 54 4.2 China 57 4.3 Germany 61 4.4 Indonesia 63 Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure 3 Table of Contents Continued 4.5 India 65 4.6 Japan 67 4.7 Poland 69 4.8 South Africa 71 4.9 United Kingdom 73 4.10 United States 76 5 Coal-Fired Power Utilities 81 5.1 Market Analysis 81 5.2 Investment Risk Hypotheses 91 5.3 Summary of Top 100 Coal-Fired Power Utilities 112 6 Thermal Coal Miners 116 6.1 Market Analysis 117 6.2 Investment Risk Hypotheses 123 6.3 Summary of Top 20 Thermal Coal Mining Companies 131 7 Coal Processing Technology Companies 132 7.1 Assessment of Available Information 132 7.2 Market Analysis 134 7.3 Investment Risk Hypotheses 139 7.4 Summary of CPT Companies 146 8 Indirect Impacts 147 8.1 Transport 147 8.2 Workers and Labour Organisations 147 8.3 Banks and Financial Institutions 148 9 Implications for Disclosure and Reporting 149 9.1 Climate Change Risk Disclosure 149 9.2 Insights from Our Research 150 9.3 Company Data Intelligence Service 151 10 Bibliography 153 Appendix A: Top Coal-Fired Power Utilities Tables 167 Appendix B: Top Thermal Coal Mining Companies Tables 177 Appendix C: Top Coal-Processing Technology Companies Tables 182 4 Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure About the Stranded Assets Programme The Stranded Assets Programme at the University of Oxford’s Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment was established in 2012 to understand environment-related risks driving asset stranding in different sectors and systemically. We research how environment-related risks might emerge and strand assets; how different risks might be interrelated; assess their materiality (in terms of scale, impact, timing, and likelihood); identify who will be affected; and what impacted groups can do to pre-emptively manage and monitor risk. We recognise that the production of high-quality research on environment-related risk factors is a necessary, though insufficient, condition for these factors to be successfully integrated into decision-making. Consequently, we also research the barriers that might prevent integration, whether in financial institutions, companies, governments, or regulators, and develop responses to address them. We also develop the data, analytics, frameworks, and models required to enable integration for these different stakeholders. The programme is based in a world leading university with a global reach and reputation. We are the only academic institution conducting work in a significant and coordinated way on stranded assets. We work with leading practitioners from across the investment chain (e.g. actuaries, asset owners, asset managers, accountants, investment consultants, lawyers), with firms and their management, and with experts from a wide range of related subject areas (e.g. finance, economics, management, geography, anthropology, climate science, law, area studies) within the University of Oxford and beyond. We have created the Stranded Assets Research Network, which brings together researchers, research institutions, and practitioners working on these and related issues internationally to share expertise. We have also created the Stranded Assets Forums, which are a series of private workshops to explore the issues involved. The Global Stranded Assets Advisory Council that guides the programme contains many of the key individuals and organisations involved in developing the emergent stranded assets agenda. The council also has a role in helping to informally co-ordinate and share information on stranded assets work internationally. Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure 5 Global Advisory Council The Stranded Assets Programme is led by Ben Caldecott and its work is guided by the Global Stranded Assets Advisory Council chaired by Professor Gordon L. Clark, Director of the Oxford Smith School. The Council is also a high-level forum for work on stranded assets to be co-ordinated internationally. Members are: Jane Ambachtsheer, Partner and Global Head of Responsible Investment, Mercer Investment Rob Bailey, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House Vicki Bakhshi, Head of Governance & Sustainable Investment, BMO Global Asset Management (EMEA) Morgan Bazilian, Affiliate Professor, The Royal Institute of Technology of Sweden Robin Bidwell, Group President, ERM David Blood, Co-Founder and Senior Partner, Generation IM Yvo de Boer, Director-General, Global Green Growth Institute Susan Burns, Founder and CEO, Global Footprint Network James Cameron, Chairman, Overseas Development Institute Diana Fox Carney, Director of Strategy and Engagement, Institute for Public Policy Research Mike Clark, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, also Director, Responsible Investment, Russell Investments Rowan Douglas, CEO, Capital, Science & Policy Practice and Chairman, Willis Research Network, Willis Group Professor Robert Eccles, Professor of Management Practice, Harvard Business School Jessica Fries, Executive Chairman, The Prince’s Accounting for Sustainability Project (A4S) Professor Charles Godfray, Director, Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food Ben Goldsmith, CEO, Menhaden Capital Connie Hedegaard, Chair, KR Foundation, and former European Commissioner for Climate Action Thomas Heller, Executive Director, Climate Policy Initiative Anthony Hobley, CEO, Carbon Tracker Initiative Catherine Howarth, CEO, ShareAction Michael Jacobs, Senior Advisor, IDDRI Zoe Knight, Head, Climate Change Centre of Excellence, HSBC Bernice Lee, Director, Climate Change and Resource Initiatives, World Economic Forum Bob Litterman, Senior Partner and Chairman of Risk Committee, Kepos Capital Mindy Lubber, President, Ceres Nick Mabey, CEO, E3G Richard Mattison, CEO, Trucost David Nussbaum, CEO, WWF-UK Stephanie Pfeifer, CEO, Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change Julian Poulter, Executive Director, Asset Owners Disclosure Project Fiona Reynolds, Managing Director, UN Principles for Responsible Investment Nick Robins, Co-Director, UNEP Inquiry into a Sustainable Financial System Paul Simpson, CEO, Carbon Disclosure Project Andrew Steer, President and CEO, World Resources Institute James Thornton, CEO, ClientEarth Simon Upton, Director, Environment Directorate, OECD Steve Waygood, Chief Responsible Investment Officer, Aviva Investors Peter Wheeler, Executive Vice President, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Michael Wilkins, Managing Director, Infrastructure Finance Ratings, Standard & Poor’s Baroness Worthington, Director, Sandbag Simon Zadek, Co-Director, UNEP Inquiry into a Sustainable Financial System Dimitri Zenghelis, Principal Research Fellow, Grantham Institute, London School of Economics 6 Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure About the Authors Ben Caldecott is the Founder and Director of the Stranded Assets Programme. He is concurrently an Adviser to The Prince of Wales’s Accounting for Sustainability Project and an Academic Visitor at the Bank of England. Lucas Kruitwagen is a Research Assistant in the Stranded Assets Programme. He is also a Visiting Researcher at Imperial College London where his MSc thesis won the research prize. He holds a BEng from McGill University where he was a Loran Scholar. Gerard Dericks is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Stranded Assets Programme. Prior to joining the Smith School he was an analyst at Property Market Analysis LLP and research consultant for Policy Exchange in London. He holds a PhD and MSc from the London School of Economics and a BA from Ritsumeikan University. Daniel J. Tulloch is a Research Associate on the Stranded Assets Programme. Daniel recently submitted his PhD in finance at the University of Otago, New Zealand. He also holds an MSc in International Accounting and Financial Management from the University of East Anglia, Norwich. Irem Kok is a Research Assistant for the Stranded Assets Programme. She is a doctoral candidate and a Clarendon Scholar at the University of Oxford. She holds a BA in Philosophy and Economics, an MA in Political Science from Bogazici University, and an MSc from the University of Oxford with a Weidenfeld-Hoffmann Scholarship. James Mitchell is a Researcher at the Stranded Assets Programme. He is concurrently a Senior Associate at the Carbon War Room, where he leads
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coal Production
    Coal Production A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK 1 2 Summary of coal production entered on entity worksheets 3 Richard Heede 4 Climate Mitigation Services 5 22-May-13 6 7 8 1850s 1860s 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 9 Coal 10 11 12 13 1 Alpha Natural Resources, USA 14 15 2 Anglo American, UK 16 17 3 Arch Coal Company, USA 18 19 4 British Coal Corporation, UK 20 21 5 BP Coal, UK 22 23 6 BHP Billiton, Australia 24 25 7 China, Peoples Republic 26 27 8 Coal India, India 28 29 9 ConocoPhillips, USA 30 31 10 Consol Energy, USA 0.03 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0 32 33 11 Cyprus Amax, USA 34 35 12 Czechoslovakia 36 37 13 Czech Republic + Slovakia 38 39 14 ExxonMobil, USA 40 41 15 FSU (Former Soviet Union) 42 43 16 Kazakhstan 44 45 17 Kerr-McGee Coal (Anadarko), USA 46 47 18 Kiewit Mining Group, USA 48 49 19 Luminant, USA 50 51 20 Massey Energy, USA 52 53 21 Murray Coal, USA 54 55 22 North American Coal Corp., USA 56 57 23 North Korea 58 59 24 Occidental, USA 60 61 25 Peabody Energy, USA 62 63 26 Pittsburgh & Midway Coal (Chevron) 64 65 27 Poland 66 67 28 Rio Tinto, Australia 68 69 29 RAG (Ruhrkohle AG), Germany 70 71 30 Russian Federation (not including FSU) 72 73 31 RWE, Germany 74 75 32 Sasol, South Africa 76 77 33 Singareni Collieries Company, India 78 79 34 UK Coal, UK 80 81 35 Ukraine 82 83 36 Westmoreland Coal, USA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 84 85 37 Xstrata, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • The Gxp Dictionary 1St Edition
    Testo Expert Knowledge The GxP Dictionary 1st edition Definitions relating to GxP and Quality Assurance 1 Note: Some of the information contained in this GxP Dictionary does not apply equally to all countries. Depending on the respective local legislation, other definitions may apply to certain terms and topics. The sections affected are not separately identified. 2 Foreword Efficacy, identity and purity are qual- This GxP Dictionary explains the ity attributes, which are required of majority of terms relating to GxP, products from the GMP-regulated qualification, validation and quality environment. The term “Good Manu- assurance. facturing Practice” sums up the quality assurance requirements from national It is intended as a compact reference and international regulations and laws. guide and aid for all those involved Other GxP forms have now been de- in GMP, and does not purport to be veloped, whose scope also expands complete. to adjacent sectors such as medical devices and life sciences. Testo SE & Co. KGaA The complex requirements of the “GMP compliance” generate a variety of specific concepts and abbrevia- tions. 3 GxP Dictionary Contents Contents 10 Terms and Definitions C 15 Calibration 0-9 15 CAPA 10 21 CFR 210/211 15 Capacity Test 10 483 15 CEP (Certificate of Suitability of Monographs of the European A Pharmacopoeia) 11 Action Limits 15 CFR 11 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient 15 CFU (Colony-Forming Unit) (API) 16 cGMP 11 ADI (Acceptable Daily Intake) 16 Challenge Test 11 Airlock Concept 16 Change Control 11 Annex 16 Clean Corridor
    [Show full text]
  • Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia
    Cerrejón coal mine Colombia Sectors: Coal Mining Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: May 19 2021 Contact: Alex Scrivener, Policy Officer, Global Justice Now Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.cerrejon.com/site/ About Cerrejón coal mine The Cerrejón coal mine in La Guajira, Colombia, is the largest in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Its steady expansion since its founding in 1976 has led to the destruction of whole villages populated by local indigenous and Afro-Colombian people. The extracted coal is almost exclusively for export to rich countries with local people seeing few benefits. The mine is owned by three giant UK-listed mining companies: BHP Billiton, Anglo American and Glencore. All of which receive billions of pounds in finance from UK banks and pension funds. Roche, Chancleta, Tamaquitos, Manantial, Tabaco, Palmarito, El Descanso, Caracoli, Zarahita, Patilla. These are the names of just some of the communities that have been devastated or simply wiped off the map by the Cerrejón mining project. Latest developments Anglo American to exit from Cerrejon shareholding, BHP Group to follow Feb 25 2021 Glencore leaving, passing mining contracts to Republic of Colombia Feb 4 2021 Impacts Social and human rights impacts While the Cerrejón mining company's promotional material gives the impression that it is helping the displaced communities, the reality is that the mining company has used underhand tactics to buy off individuals and sow internal division within the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Last Chance for Coal Making Carbon Capture and Storage a Reality
    a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality foreword by Rt Hon Margaret Beckett MP Jon Gibbins & Hannah Chalmers David Hawkins Graeme Sweeney Jules Kortenhorst Linda McAvan MEP Alain Berger Ruud Lubbers Frances O’Grady Mike Farley Matthew Lockwood Ben Caldecott & Thomas Sweetman Keith Allott Karla Hill & Tim Malloch Sheryl Carter compiled and edited by Chris Littlecott This publication is part of Green Alliance’s climate change theme (www.green-alliance.org.uk/climatechange), which is kindly supported by Shell. Green Alliance’s work on the financing of CCS demonstration projects is kindly supported by BP. The views expressed in this publication remain those of the individual authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Green Alliance or its sponsors. Acknowledgments Many thanks to all those who have advised and assisted in the preparation of this publication, particularly Rebecca Collyer, Mark Johnston and Jesse Scott. Special thanks are due to Catherine Beswick, Karen Crane, Maureen Murphy, Rebekah Phillips and Faye Scott for their invaluable editorial input. a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality Edited by Chris Littlecott ISBN 978-1-905869-15-2 © Green Alliance 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Medical Device Law and Regulation March 2-4, 2021 | Live Virtual Event Speaker Biographies
    Introduction to Medical Device Law and Regulation March 2-4, 2021 | Live Virtual Event Speaker Biographies DEBORAH BAKER-JANIS joined NSF International in 2013 after working in the medical device industry for over 10 years, including in both regulatory affairs and product development. Her experience includes the development of pre‐clinical testing protocols, risk documentation, quality system and regulatory affairs standard operating procedures, sales training materials, safety reports and domestic and international regulatory strategies and submissions. Ms. Baker‐Janis has supported the development and commercialization of a wide range of products including cardiovascular devices, general and plastic surgery devices, gastroenterology devices and general hospital devices. Her educational background is in biomedical engineering. MAHNU DAVAR is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Arnold & Porter. His practice focuses on assisting FDA-regulated entities with complex regulatory and compliance matters. He has represented early stage medical technology companies, clinical labs, major academic research institutions, and some of the largest multinational drug and device companies in the oncology, ophthalmology, pain, and diabetes care spaces. Mr. Davar routinely counsels clients on the regulatory and compliance aspects of promotional launch campaigns, clinical research, educational grants and charitable giving, manufacturing and supply chain, deal diligence, and other mission-critical activities. He has conducted significant compliance investigations and audits for business operations in the US, Europe, and Asia, and has extensive experience defending companies in criminal and civil healthcare fraud investigations. He has also assisted clients to prepare for and navigate state and federal regulatory inspections. Mr. Davar is a lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, a Fellow of the Salzburg Global Seminar, and a former Fulbright Scholar to India.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Annual Report 2020
    2020 Annual Report Annual Report 2020 For further details about information disclosure, please visit the website of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited at Important Notice The Board, Supervisory Committee and the Directors, Supervisors and senior management of the Company warrant the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the information contained in the annual report and there are no misrepresentations, misleading statements contained in or material omissions from the annual report for which they shall assume joint and several responsibilities. The 2020 Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited has been approved by the eleventh meeting of the eighth session of the Board. All ten Directors of quorum attended the meeting. SHINEWING (HK) CPA Limited issued the standard independent auditor report with clean opinion for the Company. Mr. Li Xiyong, Chairman of the Board, Mr. Zhao Qingchun, Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Xu Jian, head of Finance Management Department, hereby warrant the authenticity, accuracy and completeness of the financial statements contained in this annual report. The Board of the Company proposed to distribute a cash dividend of RMB10.00 per ten shares (tax inclusive) for the year of 2020 based on the number of shares on the record date of the dividend and equity distribution. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual report regarding the Company’s future plans do not constitute any substantive commitment to investors and investors are reminded of the investment risks. There was no appropriation of funds of the Company by the Controlling Shareholder or its related parties for non-operational activities. There were no guarantees granted to external parties by the Company without complying with the prescribed decision-making procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertek Pharmaceutical Services
    PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES Laboratory & Assurance Solutions INTERTEK PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES Total Quality Assurance for Pharmaceutical Development and Manufacturing Across your product lifecycle, our expertise brings you the insight you need to accelerate pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical or medical device product development. Our assurance solutions allow you to identify and mitigate risks associated with products, processes, operational and quality management systems, assets and supply chains. Our specialists bring many years of experience across a variety of product areas including: • Innovative and Generic Pharmaceuticals • Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products • Peptides, Proteins • Nutritional Products, Dietary • Biosimilars Supplements • Monoclonal Antibodies • Consumer Healthcare and Cosmetics • Antibody-drug Conjugates • Medical Devices • Oligonucleotide Therapeutics • Veterinary Medicines • Vaccines • Over-the-Counter (OTC) Drugs 2 Achieving Total Quality You can rely on our global network of experts, Assurance laboratories and specialists to deliver support We have delivered flexible including analysis, bioanalysis, formulation Our scientists, regulatory experts and auditors development, biologics characterization, contract services to the work with you at every stage of development specialist inhalation development expertise, global pharmaceutical and manufacturing, providing responsive, regulatory consultancy, risk assessment, quality compliant solutions. auditing and supply chain management industry for over 25 years At Intertek,
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Subject to Exclusion
    Opdateret 01-08-2021 Vellivs Ekslusionsliste Velliv ønsker ikke at investere i selskaber, som bryder med Vellivs ESG-kriterier fastlagt i politikken for ansvarlig investering og aktivt ejerskab og som ikke udviser forandringsvilje i forhold til deres håndtering af ESG-risici. Endelig ønsker Velliv ikke at investere i tobaksselselskaber, selskaber med aktivteter i kontroversielle våben eller selskaber, hvor mere end 5 pct. af omsætningen stammer fra udvinding af kul og oliesand. Selsakb Kommentar 22nd Century Group, Inc. Tobacco AECOM Contr.Weapons Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. Contr.Weapons Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. Contr.Weapons Aeroteh SA Contr.Weapons Airbus SE Contr.Weapons Al-Eqbal Co. for Investment Plc Tobacco ALLETE, Inc. Kul Alliance Holdings GP LP Coal Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP Coal Alliance Resource Partners LP Coal Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc Coal Alpha Natural Resources Inc Coal Altadis Emisiones Financieras SA Tobacco Altadis SA Tobacco AltaGas Ltd. Gas/ESG Altius Minerals Corporation Coal Altria Group, Inc. Tobacco Anglo American plc Kul Anglo Pacific Group plc Coal Arch Resources, Inc. Coal Arcis Resources Corp. Tobacco Aryt Industries Ltd. Contr.Weapons Asenovgrad Tabac AD Tobacco Ashtrom Group Ltd. Normviolation>human rights Athabasca Oil Corporation Oilsand Avco Corp. Contr.Weapons B.A.T. Capital Corp. Tobacco B.A.T. Finance BV Tobacco B.A.T. International Finance Plc Tobacco Babcock International Group plc Contr.Weapons BADECO ADRIA dd Tobacco BAE Systems (Finance) Ltd. Contr.Weapons BAE Systems plc Contr.Weapons Bat Brasil Tobacco Bathurst Resources Limited Coal Baytex Energy (LP) Ltd. Oilsand Baytex Energy Corp. Oilsand Bellatora, Inc. Tobacco BHP Group Limited Kul BHP Group Plc Kul BlackPearl Resources, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Price Floor Consultation: the Government Response
    Carbon price floor consultation: the Government response March 2011 Carbon price floor consultation: the Government response March 2011 Official versions of this document are printed on 100% recycled paper. When you have finished with it please recycle it again. If using an electronic version of the document, please consider the environment and only print the pages which you need and recycle them when you have finished. © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-84532-845-0 PU1145 Contents Page Foreword 3 Executive summary 5 Chapter 1 Government response to the consultation 7 Chapter 2 The carbon price floor 15 Annex A Contributors to the consultation 21 Annex B HMRC Tax Impact and Information Note 25 1 Foreword Budget 2011 re-affirmed our aim to be the greenest Government ever. The Coalition’s programme for Government set out our ambitious environmental goals: • introducing a floor price for carbon • increasing the proportion of tax revenues from environmental taxes • making the tax system more competitive, simpler, fairer and greener This consultation response demonstrates the significant progress the Coalition Government has already made towards these goals. As announced at Budget 2011, the UK will be the first country in the world to introduce a carbon price floor for the power sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Energy Bill: Pre–Legislative Scrutiny
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre–legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012-13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 24 May, 12, 19 and 26 June, 3 July, and 10 July 2012 Published on Monday 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited
    THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this circular or as to what action to take in relation to this circular, you should consult your licensed securities dealer, bank manager, solicitor, professional accountant or other professional adviser. If you have sold or transferred all your shares in Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, you should at once hand this circular to the purchaser(s) or transferee(s) or to the bank, or a licensed securities dealer or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser(s) or transferee(s). Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this circular, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this circular. This circular is for information only and does not constitute an invitation or offer to acquire, purchase or subscribe for any securities in the Company. 兗州煤業股份有限公司 YANZHOU COAL MINING COMPANY LIMITED (A joint stock limited company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China with limited liability) (Stock Code: 1171) (1) PROPOSED APPOINTMENT OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS; (2) PROPOSED APPOINTMENT OF NON-STAFF REPRESENTATIVE SUPERVISORS; (3) PROPOSED RENEWAL OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR DIRECTORS, SUPERVISORS AND SENIOR
    [Show full text]
  • ABM Investama Tbk PT Involvement in Coal Mining Adani Ports & Special
    Company Comment ABM Investama Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd Violation of established norms Adaro Energy Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Adaro Indonesia PT Involvement in coal mining Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc Involvement in nuclear weapons Aeroteh SA Involvement in cluster munitions Agritrade Resources Ltd Involvement in coal mining Airbus SE Involvement in nuclear weapons Alfa Energi Investama Tbk PT Involvement in coal mining Alliance Holdings GP LP Involvement in coal mining Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP / Alliance Involvement in coal mining Resource Finance Corp Alliance Resource Partners LP Involvement in coal mining Alpha Natural Resources Inc Involvement in coal mining Altius Minerals Corp Involvement in coal mining Ammunition & Metallurgy Industries Group Involvement in anti-personnel mines Anglo Pacific Group plc Involvement in coal mining Anhui Great Wall Military Industry Co Ltd Involvement in cluster munitions Arch Coal Inc Involvement in coal mining Armament Research and Development Involvement in cluster munitions & anti- Establishment personnel mines Arrow Exploration Corp Involvement in oil sand Aryt Industries Ltd Involvement in cluster munitions Ashakacem PLC Involvement in coal mining Asia Resource Minerals PLC Involvement in coal mining Athabasca Oil Corp Involvement in oil sand Atomenergoprom JSC (Atomic Energy Power Corp) Involvement in nuclear weapons Babcock International Group PLC Involvement in nuclear weapons BAE Systems PLC Involvement in nuclear weapons
    [Show full text]