DOCSLIB.ORG

San Antonio Bay: Status and Trends Reports PREPARED BY: Kiersten M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Antonio Bay: Status and Trends Reports PREPARED BY: Kiersten M San Antonio Bay Status and Trends Reports REPORT 1: Water Quality, Benthic Macrofauna, and Epibenthic Fauna REPORT 2: Marine Resources REPORT 3: Colonial Nesting Waterbirds REPORT 4: Whooping Crane REPORT 5: Upland Birds REPORT 6: Attwater’s Prairie Chicken REPORT 7: Aplomado Falcon March 2014 San Antonio Bay: Status and Trends Reports PREPARED BY: Kiersten M. Stanzel, Ph.D. James A. Dodson San Antonio Bay Partnership CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Paul Montagna, Ph.D. Terry Palmer Harte Research Institute Tim Anderson Beau Hardegree United States Fish and Wildlife Service Norman Boyd Walter Bubley,Ph.D. Brent Ortego Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Ray Kirkwood Mid‐Coast Chapter, Texas Master Naturalist IN COOPERATION WITH: Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program FUNDING PROVIDED BY: Texas General Land Office, Coastal Management Program, Cycle 16 This paper is funded by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its sub‐agencies. March 2014 Full document should be cited as: Stanzel, K.M and J.A. Dodson, eds. 2014. San Antonio Bay: Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Individual reports should be cited as: Montagna, P.A. and T.A. Palmer. 2014. Report 1: Water Quality, Benthic Macrofauna, dan Epibenthic Fauna (pp. 1‐20). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐XX. pp. 1‐241. Boyd, N. and W. Bubley. 2014. Report 2: Marine Resources (pp. 1‐167). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Hardegree, B. 2014. Report 3: Colonial Nesting Water Birds (pp. 1‐33). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Kirkwood, R. 2014. Report 4: Whooping Crane (pp. 1‐10). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Ortego, B. 2014. Report 5: Upland Birds (pp. 1‐4). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Anderson, T. 2014. Report 6: Attwater’s Prairie Chicken (pp. 1‐4). In San Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. Anderson, T. 2014. Report 6: Aplomado Falcon (pp. 1‐3). Inn Sa Antonio Bay : Status and Trends Reports. Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Publication CBBEP‐92. pp. 1‐241. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i REPORT 1: Water Quality, Benthic Macrofauna, and Epibenthic Fauna ..................................... 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 1.3 Estuarine Data Acquisition ................................................................................................................. 1.3 Changes in Estuarine Water Quality .................................................................................................. 1.3 Changes in Macrofauna and Epifauna Communities ......................................................................... 1.4 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 1.5 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................................... 1.5 Macrofauna and Epifauna Communities ........................................................................................... 1.5 Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 1.19 References ......................................................................................................................................... 1.19 REPORT 2: Marine Resources ..................................................................................................... 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2.2 Fishery Independent Data.................................................................................................................. 2.3 Fishery Dependent Data .................................................................................................................... 2.3 Recreational Harvest Data ............................................................................................................. 2.3 Commercial Harvest Data .............................................................................................................. 2.4 Assemblage Data ............................................................................................................................... 2.4 Spatial Distribution of Species ........................................................................................................... 2.4 Species Diversity ................................................................................................................................ 2.4 Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 2.5 Fishery Independent Data.................................................................................................................. 2.5 Fishery Dependent Data .................................................................................................................... 2.6 Recreational Harvest Data ............................................................................................................. 2.6 Commercial Harvest Data .............................................................................................................. 2.6 Assemblage Data ............................................................................................................................... 2.6 Spatial Distribution of Species ........................................................................................................... 2.7 Species Diversity ................................................................................................................................ 2.8 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 2.9 Fishery Independent Data.................................................................................................................. 2.9 Fishery Dependent Data .................................................................................................................. 2.59 Recreational Harvest .................................................................................................................... 2.59 Commercial Harvest ..................................................................................................................... 2.73 Assemblage Data ............................................................................................................................. 2.88 Annual Species Assemblages within SAB ................................................................................... 2.105 Spatial Distribution of Species ....................................................................................................... 2.108 Bag Seine .................................................................................................................................... 2.108 Bay Trawl .................................................................................................................................... 2.128 Gillnet ......................................................................................................................................... 2.143 Species Diversity ............................................................................................................................ 2.163 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 2.166 Non‐native species ......................................................................................................................... 2.166 Future Threats/Considerations ...................................................................................................... 2.167 References ....................................................................................................................................... 2.167 REPORT 3: Colonial Nesting Waterbirds ..................................................................................... 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3.2 Methods ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Master Document Draft EFH EIS Gulf
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Generic Essential Fish Habitat Amendment to the following fishery management plans of the Gulf of Mexico (GOM): SHRIMP FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO RED DRUM FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO REEF FISH FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO STONE CRAB FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO CORAL AND CORAL REEF FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO SPINY LOBSTER FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL MIGRATORY PELAGIC RESOURCES OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC VOLUME 1: TEXT March 2004 Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council The Commons at Rivergate 3018 U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000 Tampa, Florida 33619-2266 Tel: 813-228-2815 (toll-free 888-833-1844), FAX: 813-225-7015 E-mail: [email protected] This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA17FC1052. COVER SHEET Environmental Impact Statement for the Generic Essential Fish Habitat Amendment to the fishery management plans of the Gulf of Mexico Draft () Final (X) Type of Action: Administrative (x) Legislative ( ) Area of Potential Impact: Areas of tidally influenced waters and substrates of the Gulf of Mexico and its estuaries in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida extending out to the limit of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Agency: HQ Contact: Region Contacts: U.S. Department of Commerce Steve Kokkinakis David Dale NOAA Fisheries NOAA-Strategic Planning (N/SP) (727)570-5317 Southeast Region Building SSMC3, Rm. 15532 David Keys 9721 Executive Center Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Acoustics
    Introduction to Acoustics Acoustics is the branch of physics that is concerned with the properties of sound. Bioacoustics is the branch of acoustics concerned with sounds produced by or affecting living organisms, especially relating to communication. Bioacousticians are scientists that study these sounds. For whales, their sense of sound, above all other senses, In order to help scientists understand and is the most important. It’s how they “see” their world. organize the diversity of life on Earth, animals Have you ever gone swimming off the northern coast of are classified into kingdom, phylum, class, the United States? Could you see very far in the water? order, family, genus, and species. For whales, It’s pretty murky—not because it’s polluted, but because the first classification is as follows: Kingdom: Animal there is so much plankton (free floating plants and Phylum: Chordate animals) floating in the water. Off the coast of Class: Mammals Massachusetts, you can only see about 30 ft. on a good Order: Cetacean (whales, dolphins, and day. (That’s not even a whale’s body length in some porpoises cases.) So, sound is critically important to whales for Sub-Order: Odontocete (Toothed) or communication, hunting, and navigating—the use varies Mysticete (Baleen) depending on the type of whale. OVER 90 DIFFERENT SPECIES OF WHALES This poster includes the over 90 species of the whales, dolphins and porpoises that we know of today. On the right side, you will see all the toothed whales (they tend to be smaller and there are more species). On the left side, you will see the baleen whales (they tend to be larger, but there are fewer species.) Whether a whale has baleen or teeth in their mouth influences how they feed and the social structure of the species, as well as the sounds they produce and how they use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Shorelines Workshop Bill Balboa [email protected] Living Shorelines Workshop
    Living Shorelines Workshop Bill Balboa [email protected] Living Shorelines Workshop • MBF • Need • Planning • Shoreline protection projects • Grassy Point • Mouth of Carancahua Bay • GIWW • Observations • The Matagorda Bay Foundation is dedicated to the wise stewardship of central Texas’ estuaries and the coastal watersheds that sustain them. • Created in 1995 Inflows for Whoopers– Blackburn, Hamman & Garrison • February 2019 • San Antonio Bay Partnership, Lavaca Bay Foundation and East Matagorda Bay Foundation Matagorda Bay • The unknown coast Foundation • 2nd Largest estuary in Texas • Cultural, biological, economic importance • Freshwater - Colorado and Lavaca-Navidad • Gulf passes at Mitchell’s Cut and Pass Cavallo and the Matagorda Jetties • >270,000 acres of open water and bay bottom (East and West Bays) • ~100,000 acres of wetlands • >6500 acres of oyster habitat • ~8000 acres of seagrasses Planning Shoreline Projects Grassy Point Grassy Point Mouth of Carancahua Bay Schicke Pt. Redfish Lake Mouth of Carancahua Bay Rusty Feagin, Bill Balboa, Dave Buzan, Thomas Huff, Matt Glaze, Woody Woodrow, Ray Newby Mouth of Carahcahua Bay The problem • Carancahua Bay mouth widens • Larger waves impacting Port ~122 feet per year by erosion Alto’s docks and bulkheads • Already 61 acres of marsh and • Water quality declining seagrass lost • Altered fishing prospects as • Future loss of 624 acres of marsh Carancahua and Keller Bays and seagrass under threat merge with West Matagorda Bay Schicke Point 2005 2017 Mouth of Carancahua Bay Partners •
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Flounder, Sea Trout and Redfish the Panhandle Inshore Slam
    Flounder, Sea Trout and Redfish The Panhandle Inshore Slam Presented by Ron Barwick Service Manager, Half Hitch (850) 234-2621 Hosted by Bob Fowler (850) 708-1317 Marinemax.com halfhitch.com 1 FLOUNDER IDENTIFICATION Gulf Flounder – Paralichthys albigutta Note three spots forming a triangle Southern Flounder – Paralichthys lethostigma Note absence of spots Summer Flounder – Paralichthys dentatus Note five spots on the body near the tail SIZE & BAG LIMITS 12 inch minimum overall length size limit all species 10 bag limit per person per day all species combined Southern flounder move out to the Gulf to spawn in September through November while Gulf flounder move into the Bay to spawn 6 types of flounder live in our bay 2 Rod Selection Fast and Extra Fast action rods are best for jig fishing Medium or moderate action rods are preferred when using bait Longer rods will increase casting distance while shorter rods provide more leverage and control Be careful not to confuse Action and Power Look at Line ratings and Lure Weight 3 SPINNING vs. CASTING Easiest to cast Poor leverage Better leverage Limited drag Best drag More difficult to cast Greater line control 4 Braid or Mono fishing line Braid Mono •Zero Stretch •Reasonable priced •Small Diameter •Able to stretch •No memory •Multiple colors •Can not color, coat •Has memory only not able to die •Pricey •Very durable 5 Fluorocarbon Leader • Great Leader – High abrasion resistance – Stiffer – Larger Diameter – Same density as saltwater – Carbon fleck stops light transmittal – Has UV inhibitors
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey G. Paine
    Jeffrey G. Paine Professional Summary September 24, 2021 Business address: The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology University Station, Box X Austin, TX 78713-8924 Telephone: (512) 471-1260 E-mail address: [email protected] Professional Preparation Academic Background Ph.D. Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1991 M.S. Geology, University of Washington, 1982 B.S. Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1980 Professional Appointments Present Position: Research Scientist, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin (September 1996 - Present).Develop and apply geophysical exploration techniques (seismic reflection profiling, airborne and ground-based electromagnetic induction methods, and ground-penetrating radar) in near-surface hydrogeological and stratigraphic studies. Program Director, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin (March 1998 - May 1998).Manage Geology, Geotechnology, and GIS group. Duties include identifying funding opportunities, writing and tracking proposals, allocating staff effort on projects, coordinating project use of research resources, tracking publication progress, and summarizing monthly staff activities. Research Associate, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin (July 1991 - August 1996).Develop and apply geophysical exploration techniques (seismic reflection profiling, airborne and ground-based electromagnetic induction methods, and ground-penetrating radar) in near-surface hydrogeological and stratigraphic studies. Research Scientist Associate, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin (July 1982 - June 1991).Study effects of recent and historical hurricanes on barrier islands, analyze shoreline movement from aerial photographs and topographic charts, and determine Quaternary paleogeography of the Texas coastal zone and shelf from cores and seismic data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Freshwater Inflows in Sustaining Estuarine Ecosystem Health in the San Antonio Bay Region
    The Role of Freshwater Inflows in Sustaining Estuarine Ecosystem Health in the San Antonio Bay Region Contract Number 05-018 September 15, 2006 1. Introduction Estuaries are vital aquatic habitats for supporting marine life, and they confer a multitude of benefits to humans in numerous ways. These benefits include the provision of natural resources used for a variety of market activities, recreational opportunities, transportation and aesthetics, as well as ecological functions such as storing and cycling nutrients, absorbing and detoxifying pollutants, maintaining the hydrological cycle, and moderating the local climate. The wide array of beneficial processes, functions and resources provided by the ecosystem are referred to collectively as “ecosystem services.” From this perspective, an estuary can be viewed as a valuable natural asset, or natural capital, from which these multiple goods and services flow.1 The quantity, quality and temporal variance of freshwater inflows are essential to the living and non-living components of bays and estuaries. Freshwater inflows to sustain ecosystem functions affect estuaries at all basic physical, chemical, and biological levels of interaction. The functional role of freshwater in the ecology of estuarine environments has been scientifically reviewed and is relatively well understood. This role is summarized in section 3, after a brief overview of the geographical context of the San Antonio Bay Region in the next section. Section 4 follows with discussion of the impacts of reduced freshwater inflow to the San Antonio Bay. Section 5 concludes with some general observations. 2. Geographical Context The San Antonio Bay Region, formed where the Guadalupe River meets the Guadalupe Estuary, teems with life.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–11 Edition) § 80.840
    § 80.840 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–11 Edition) Point Au Fer Reef Light 33; thence to Freeport Entrance Light 6; thence Atchafalaya Bay Pipeline Light D lati- Freeport Entrance Light 7; thence the tude 29°25.0′ N. longitude 91°31.7′ W.; seaward extremity of Freeport South thence to Atchafalaya Bay Light 1 lati- Jetty. tude 29°25.3′ N. longitude 91°35.8′ W.; [CGD 77–118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Re- thence to South Point. designated by CGD 81–017, 46 FR 28154, May (b) Lines following the general trend 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84–091, 51 FR of the highwater shoreline drawn 7787, Mar. 6, 1986] across the bayou and canal inlets from the Gulf of Mexico between South § 80.850 Brazos River, TX to the Rio Point and Calcasieu Pass except as oth- Grande, TX. erwise described in this section. (a) Except as otherwise described in (c) A line drawn on an axis of 140° this section lines drawn continuing the true through Southwest Pass general trend of the seaward, Vermillion Bay Light 4 across South- highwater shorelines across the inlets west Pass. to Brazos River Diversion Channel, San (d) A line drawn across the seaward Bernard River, Cedar Lakes, Brown extremity of the Freshwater Bayou Cedar Cut, Colorado River, Matagorda Canal Entrance Jetties. Bay, Cedar Bayou, Corpus Christi Bay, (e) A line drawn from Mermentau and Laguna Madre. Channel East Jetty Light 6 to (b) A line drawn across the seaward Mermentau Channel West Jetty Light extremity of Matagorda Ship Channel 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee
    Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee May 25, 2012 Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, & Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas, & San Antonio Bays Basin & Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (GSA BBASC) Work Plan for Adaptive Management Preliminary Scopes of Work May 25, 2012 May 10, 2012 The Honorable Troy Fraser, Co-Presiding Officer The Honorable Allan Ritter, Co-Presiding Officer Environmental Flows Advisory Group (EFAG) Mr. Zak Covar, Executive Director Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Dear Chairman Fraser, Chairman Ritter and Mr. Covar: Please accept this submittal of the Work Plan for Adaptive Management (Work Plan) from the Guadalupe, San Antonio, Mission, and Aransas Rivers and Mission, Copano, Aransas and San Antonio Bays Basin and Bay Area Stakeholders Committee (BBASC). The BBASC has offered a comprehensive list of study efforts and activities that will provide additional information for future environmental flow rulemaking as well as expand knowledge on the ecosystems of the rivers and bays within our basin. The BBASC Work Plan is prioritized in three tiers, with the Tier 1 recommendations listed in specific priority order. Study efforts and activities listed in Tier 2 are presented as a higher priority than those items listed in Tier 3; however, within the two tiers the efforts are not prioritized. The BBASC preferred to present prioritization in this manner to highlight the studies and activities it identified as most important in the immediate term without discouraging potential sponsoring or funding entities interested in advancing efforts within the other tiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 80.525
    Coast Guard, DHS Pt. 80 Madagascar Singapore 80.715 Savannah River. Maldives Surinam 80.717 Tybee Island, GA to St. Simons Is- Morocco Tonga land, GA. Oman Trinidad 80.720 St. Simons Island, GA to Amelia Is- land, FL. Pakistan Tobago Paraguay 80.723 Amelia Island, FL to Cape Canaveral, Tunisia Peru FL. Philippines Turkey 80.727 Cape Canaveral, FL to Miami Beach, Portugal United Republic of FL. Republic of Korea Cameroon 80.730 Miami Harbor, FL. 80.735 Miami, FL to Long Key, FL. [CGD 77–075, 42 FR 26976, May 26, 1977. Redes- ignated by CGD 81–017, 46 FR 28153, May 26, PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 1981; CGD 95–053, 61 FR 9, Jan. 2, 1996] SEVENTH DISTRICT PART 80—COLREGS 80.738 Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. DEMARCATION LINES GULF COAST GENERAL SEVENTH DISTRICT Sec. 80.740 Long Key, FL to Cape Sable, FL. 80.01 General basis and purpose of demarca- 80.745 Cape Sable, FL to Cape Romano, FL. tion lines. 80.748 Cape Romano, FL to Sanibel Island, FL. ATLANTIC COAST 80.750 Sanibel Island, FL to St. Petersburg, FL. FIRST DISTRICT 80.753 St. Petersburg, FL to Anclote, FL. 80.105 Calais, ME to Cape Small, ME. 80.755 Anclote, FL to the Suncoast Keys, 80.110 Casco Bay, ME. FL. 80.115 Portland Head, ME to Cape Ann, MA. 80.757 Suncoast Keys, FL to Horseshoe 80.120 Cape Ann, MA to Marblehead Neck, Point, FL. MA. 80.760 Horseshoe Point, FL to Rock Island, 80.125 Marblehead Neck, MA to Nahant, FL.
    [Show full text]
  • Drum and Croaker (Family Sciaenidae) Diversity in North Carolina
    Drum and Croaker (Family Sciaenidae) Diversity in North Carolina The waters along and off the coast are where you will find 18 of the 19 species within the Family Sciaenidae (Table 1) known from North Carolina. Until recently, the 19th species and the only truly freshwater species in this family, Freshwater Drum, was found approximately 420 miles WNW from Cape Hatteras in the French Broad River near Hot Springs. Table 1. Species of drums and croakers found in or along the coast of North Carolina. Scientific Name/ Scientific Name/ American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name Aplodinotus grunniens – Freshwater Drum Menticirrhus saxatilis – Northern Kingfish Bairdiella chrysoura – Silver Perch Micropogonias undulatus – Atlantic Croaker Cynoscion nebulosus – Spotted Seatrout Pareques acuminatus – High-hat Cynoscion nothus – Silver Seatrout Pareques iwamotoi – Blackbar Drum Cynoscion regalis – Weakfish Pareques umbrosus – Cubbyu Equetus lanceolatus – Jackknife-fish Pogonias cromis – Black Drum Larimus fasciatus – Banded Drum Sciaenops ocellatus – Red Drum Leiostomus xanthurus – Spot Stellifer lanceolatus – Star Drum Menticirrhus americanus – Southern Kingfish Umbrina coroides – Sand Drum Menticirrhus littoralis – Gulf Kingfish With so many species historically so well-known to recreational and commercial fishermen, to lay people, and their availability in seafood markets, it is not surprising that these 19 species are known by many local and vernacular names. Skimming through the ETYFish Project
    [Show full text]
  • Sabine Lake Galveston Bay East Matagorda Bay Matagorda Bay Corpus Christi Bay Aransas Bay San Antonio Bay Laguna Madre Planning
    River Basins Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin TPWD Canadian River Basin Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Wolf Creek Colorado River Basin Lipscomb Gene Howe WMA-W.A. (Pat) Murphy Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin R i t Strategic Planning a B r ve Gene Howe WMA l i Hartley a Hutchinson R n n Cypress Creek Basin Moore ia Roberts Hemphill c ad a an C C r e Guadalupe River Basin e k Lavaca River Basin Oldham r Potter Gray ive Regions Carson ed R the R ork of Wheeler Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin North F ! Amarillo Neches River Basin Salt Fork of the Red River Deaf Smith Armstrong 10Randall Donley Collingsworth Palo Duro Canyon Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin Playa Lakes WMA-Taylor Unit Pr airie D og To Nueces River Basin wn Fo rk of t he Red River Parmer Playa Lakes WMA-Dimmit Unit Swisher Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Castro Briscoe Hall Childress Caprock Canyons Caprock Canyons Trailway N orth P Red River Basin ease River Hardeman Lamb Rio Grande River Basin Matador WMA Pease River Bailey Copper Breaks Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger W To Wichita hi ng ver Sabine River Basin te ue R Foard hita Ri er R ive Wic Riv i r Wic Clay ta ve er hita hi Pat Mayse WMA r a Riv Rive ic Eisenhower ichit r e W h W tl Caddo National Grassland-Bois D'arc 6a Nort Lit San Antonio River Basin Lake Arrowhead Lamar Red River Montague South Wichita River Cooke Grayson Cochran Fannin Hockley Lubbock Lubbock Dickens King Baylor Archer T ! Knox rin Bonham North Sulphur San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Crosby r it River ive y R Bowie R B W iv os r es
    [Show full text]