DOCSLIB.ORG

Ship Structures Under Sail and Under Gunfire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ship Structures Under Sail and Under Gunfire Ship structures under sail and under gunfire By Prof. Francisco Fernández-González TABLE OF CONTENTS SHIP STRUCTURES UNDER SAIL AND UNDER GUNFIRE..................................17.1 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................17.1 Memories ............................................................................................................................17.2 Ships, Men, Yards..............................................................................................................17.3 Spanish Ships-of-the-Line ...................................................................................................17.3 French Ships-of-the-Line.....................................................................................................17.4 British Ships-of-the Line (WATT, LAV1)..........................................................................17.5 On British Ships at Trafalgar (WATT)................................................................................17.6 Timelines ............................................................................................................................17.7 HMS Victory ........................................................................................................................17.7 The Bellona Class of 74-gun ships......................................................................................17.8 The San Juan Nepomuceno .................................................................................................17.8 The Santísima Trinidad .......................................................................................................17.9 The Príncipe de Asturias .....................................................................................................17.9 The Santa Ana .....................................................................................................................17.9 The Rayo..............................................................................................................................17.9 The San Ildefonso ................................................................................................................17.9 Structures ...........................................................................................................................17.10 From the West Indies to Europe..........................................................................................17.10 British versus French construction in Spain in the 1760s ...................................................17.16 The design of the San Ildefonso, 1782 ................................................................................17.17 Scarphs, Joints, Dowels.....................................................................................................17.18 Hull complexity ...................................................................................................................17.18 Doweling .............................................................................................................................17.19 Shear ....................................................................................................................................17.19 Lateral design load of bolted joints (RAWI).......................................................................17.20 Design dowel-bearing strength of wood members in dry condition (12-19% MC)............17.21 Effect of moisture content (MC) .........................................................................................17.21 Ultimate compressive strength ............................................................................................17.21 Modes of Failure of Doweled Joints (AFPA)......................................................................17.21 Dowel Bearing Strength Estimates, F (psi) .........................................................................17.23 Dowel Bending Strength Estimates, Fb (psi) ......................................................................17.23 − 17.i − Application to Ships of the Line of 1805............................................................................ 17.24 Loadings on Hull at Sea.................................................................................................... 17.26 Static loads .......................................................................................................................... 17.26 Dynamic loads .................................................................................................................... 17.27 Hull structures of Romero Landa’s Ships ...................................................................... 17.30 Effect of arming/disarming afloat on hull structures .......................................................... 17.35 Cruising and Launching Drafts (JMJG).............................................................................. 17.36 Launching and Floating Out............................................................................................ 17.37 From land to water .............................................................................................................. 17.37 Lightship condition ............................................................................................................. 17.37 Hull structure weight........................................................................................................... 17.38 Disarming and Careening ................................................................................................... 17.39 Hull Materials.................................................................................................................... 17.42 Stress waves in Wood ......................................................................................................... 17.42 Dynamic Loading................................................................................................................ 17.44 Impact Loads....................................................................................................................... 17.44 Load Duration Factor.......................................................................................................... 17.45 Partial loads and partial durations....................................................................................... 17.45 Mechanical Model............................................................................................................. 17.46 Side shell............................................................................................................................. 17.46 Crushing and Shear ............................................................................................................. 17.47 Bending and Crushing......................................................................................................... 17.48 Deck planking ..................................................................................................................... 17.50 Keel scarphs ........................................................................................................................ 17.50 Frame timbers ..................................................................................................................... 17.51 Effect of chocks between frame timbers............................................................................. 17.51 Cross chocks for frames...................................................................................................... 17.51 Hanging knees..................................................................................................................... 17.52 Lodging knees..................................................................................................................... 17.53 Hooked Wales and Planking............................................................................................... 17.53 Treenails, bolts and nails of a 74-gun ship ......................................................................... 17.53 Application to the San Ildefonso (74) ................................................................................. 17.54 Application to the USS Constitution ................................................................................... 17.55 − 17.ii − Scantling to Rules after 1870 ............................................................................................17.56 Application of the Rules for 1912 .......................................................................................17.56 Application of the Rules for 1871 .......................................................................................17.57 Comparison of iron and wooden knees for equivalent strength and rigidity ......................17.59 Wooden Walls under Gunfire ..........................................................................................17.61 Penetration in wood.............................................................................................................17.61 Alternative model ................................................................................................................17.63 Damage in Combat ..............................................................................................................17.64 Impact Model Tests ...........................................................................................................17.65
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESPS Santa María Frigate EUNAVFOR Med GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
    NAVAL ASSET ESPS Santa María Frigate EUNAVFOR Med GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Frigate: Santa Maria class Lenght: 137,7 m Beam: 14,3 m Draft: 7,8 m Displacement : 4,100 t Speed : 29 kts OVERWIEW Spanish Frigate SANTA MARÍA (F-81) is the first of the Spanish Fleet’s 41st Escorts Squadron, and she takes her name after the Flag Ship of Cristobal Colón expedition, who discovered America the 12th of October of 1492. SANTA MARÍA home port is Rota Naval Base in the southwest of Spain. She is fitted with an AB-212 helicopter that completes her crew capabilities and ensures she conducts missions and tasks assigned by EUNAVFOR MED Force Commander. “Santa María” class frigates are escorts with the main task of protecting other units and maintaining sea lines of communications. However, their versatility allows the F-80 frigates to carry out a wide range of missions, which can be grouped into two broad categories: • Maritime Interdiction Operations: known as “MIO”, these consist of shipping control in a given area to ensure the maintenance of safe passage within any given restrictions or regulations as ruled by International Organisations. This is achieved by identifying, inter- cepting, boarding, searching, and if necessary, the detention of suspect vessels; • Protection of High Value units: the intended task for the “Santa Maria” class was to act as the ocean escort for battle groups or merchant ships. Contact details European Union Naval Force Mediterranean Operation Sophia Media and Public information office Tel: +39 06 4691 9442 ; +39 06 46919451 (IT Office hours) Mobile: +39 334 6891930 (Silent hours and weekend) Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] WEBSITE: www.eeas.europa.eu/eunavfor-med.
    [Show full text]
  • USS CONSTELLATION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 USS CONSTELLATION Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Summary The USS Constellation’s career in naval service spanned one hundred years: from commissioning on July 28, 1855 at Norfolk Navy Yard, Virginia to final decommissioning on February 4, 1955 at Boston, Massachusetts. (She was moved to Baltimore, Maryland in the summer of 1955.) During that century this sailing sloop-of-war, sometimes termed a “corvette,” was nationally significant for its ante-bellum service, particularly for its role in the effort to end the foreign slave trade. It is also nationally significant as a major resource in the mid-19th century United States Navy representing a technological turning point in the history of U.S. naval architecture. In addition, the USS Constellation is significant for its Civil War activities, its late 19th century missions, and for its unique contribution to international relations both at the close of the 19th century and during World War II. At one time it was believed that Constellation was a 1797 ship contemporary to the frigate Constitution moored in Boston. This led to a long-standing controversy over the actual identity of the Constellation. Maritime scholars long ago reached consensus that the vessel currently moored in Baltimore is the 1850s U.S. navy sloop-of-war, not the earlier 1797 frigate. Describe Present and Historic Physical Appearance. The USS Constellation, now preserved at Baltimore, Maryland, was built at the navy yard at Norfolk, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islands Great War Study Group
    CHANNEL ISLANDS GREAT WAR STUDY GROUP Le Défilé de la Victoire – 14 Juillet 1919 JOURNAL 27 AUGUST 2009 Please note that Copyright for any articles contained in this Journal rests with the Authors as shown. Please contact them directly if you wish to use their material. 1 Hello All It will not have escaped the notice of many of us that the month of July, 2009, with the deaths of three old gentlemen, saw human bonds being broken with the Great War. This is not a place for obituaries, collectively the UK’s national press has done that task more adequately (and internationally, I suspect likewise for New Zealand, the USA and the other protagonists of that War), but it is in a way sad that they have died. Harry Patch and Henry Allingham could recount events from the battles at Jutland and Passchendaele, and their recollections have, in recent years, served to educate youngsters about the horrors of war, and yet? With age, memory can play tricks, and the facts of the past can be modified to suit the beliefs of the present. For example, Harry Patch is noted as having become a pacifist, and to exemplify that, he stated that he had wounded, rather than killed, a German who was charging Harry’s machine gun crew with rifle and bayonet, by Harry firing his Colt revolver. I wonder? My personal experience in the latter years of my military career, having a Browning pistol as my issued weapon, was that the only way I could have accurately hit a barn door was by throwing the pistol at it! Given the mud and the filth, the clamour and the noise, the fear, a well aimed shot designed solely to ‘wing’ an enemy does seem remarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice Pipe June 2021
    TINGIRA AUSTRALIA TINGIRA AUSTRALIA VOICEPIPE JUNE 2021 TINGIRA Welcome National Committee BRAD MURPHY Tingira President ANZAC DAY National Roundup JOHN JRTS Billy Stokes PERRYMAN 1st Intake 2021 Stonehaven Medal TINGIRA.ORG.AU PATRON CHAIRMAN VADM Russ Crane Lance Ker AO, CSM, RANR QLD ACT TINGIRA NATIONAL COMMITTEE 2021 - 2024 PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY TREASURER Brad Murphy - QLD Chris Parr - NSW Mark Lee - NSW David Rafferty - NSW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Darryn Rose - NSW Jeff Wake - WA Graeme Hunter - VIC Paul Kalajzich - WA Kevin Purkis - QLD TINGIRA AUSTRALIA VOICEPIPE JUNE 2021 DISTRIBUTION & CORRESPONDENCE E. [email protected] W. tingira.org.au • All official communication and correspondence for Tingira Australia Association to be sent in writing (email) to the Association Secretary, only via email format is accepted. • No other correspondence (social media) in any format will be recognised or answered • VoicePipe is published 2-3 times annually on behalf of the Committee for the Tingira Australia Association Inc, for members and friends of CS & NSS Sobraon, HMAS Tingira, HMAS Leeuwin and HMAS Cerberus Junior Recruit Training Schemes FRONT COVER • VoicePipe is not for sale or published as a printed publication John Perryman with his • Electronic on PDF, website based, circulation refurbished antique 25 cm worldwide Admiralty Pattern 3860A signalling projector • Editors - Secretary & Tingira Committee • Copyright - Tingira Australia Association Inc. Photograph 1 January 2011 Meredith Perryman WHEEL to MIDSHIPS Welcome - Tingira National Committee ife is like a rolling predict that we move through stone, well so be the rest of 2021 with more L it. confidence on life than the Here at Tingira, we don’t experience of the 2020 Covid “ year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turtle Free
    FREE THE TURTLE PDF Cynthia Rylant,Preston McDaniels | 48 pages | 01 Apr 2006 | Beach Lane Books | 9780689863127 | English | New York, NY, United Kingdom Turtle (submersible) - Wikipedia They scored their biggest and best-known hit in with the song " Happy Together " [2]. The band broke up in Adhering to the prevailing musical trend, they rebranded themselves as a folk rock group under the name The Tyrtlesan intentionally stylized misspelling inspired by The The Turtle and The Beatles. However, the trendy spelling did not survive long. As with the Byrds, the Turtles achieved breakthrough success with a cover of a Bob The Turtle song. One single, the tough "Outside Chance", written by Warren Zevon and featuring guitar work in the The Turtle of The Beatles' " Taxman ", did not chart. At the start ofdrummer Don Murray and bassist Chuck Portz quit the group. The first of several key Turtles singles co-written by Garry Bonner and Alan Gordon" Happy Together " had already been rejected by countless performers. The Turtles' only No. An album of the same name followed and peaked at No. Impressed by Chip Douglas's studio arrangements, Michael Nesmith approached him after a Turtles show at the Whisky a Go Go and invited him to become The Monkees ' new producer, as that band wanted to break out of their "manufactured" studio mold. Douglas was replaced by Jim Pons on bass. Nineteen sixty-seven proved to be the Turtles' most successful year on the music charts. Both 45s signaled a certain shift in the band's style. Golden Hits was released later The Turtle year, charting in the top The similar album covers for The Turtle Turtles! Inrhythm guitarist Jim Tucker left the band citing the pressure of touring and recording new material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Family of Admiral Sir Philip Broke, Bt
    FRIENDS OF HMS TRINCOMALEE SUMMER 2016 The Life of Sir Philip Broke TS Foudroyant at the Movies Mess Deck Crossword / Wordsearch / Future events Annual General Meeting Notice is hereby given of our: Annual General Meeting 2016 Wednesday 14th September at 7.30pm Hart Village Hall, Hartlepool, TS27 3AW AGENDA: 1. Welcome and apologies for absence 2. Minutes of the last Annual General Meeting held on 23rd September 2015 3. Chairman’s report 4. Honorary Treasurer’s report and accounts for the 12 month period ending 31st March 2016 5. Election of Trustees 6. Appointment of Honorary Auditor 7. Any other business (Notified to the Secretary prior to the meeting) Members interested in joining the Committee are warmly encouraged to make themselves known to the Secretary of the ‘Friends’. All candidates for election need at least one nominee from the present Committee. The closing time for all nominations to be submitted to the Secretary is 2nd September 2016. Ian Purdy Hon. Secretary Any correspondence concerning the Friends Association should be sent to: The Secretary, Ian Purdy 39 The Poplars, Wolviston, Billingham TS22 5LY Tel: 01740 644381 E-mail: [email protected] Correspondence and contributions for the magazine to: The Editor, Hugh Turner Chevin House, 30 Kingfisher Close, Bishop Cuthbert, Hartlepool TS26 0GA Tel: 01429 236848 E-Mail: [email protected] Membership matters directed to: The Membership Secretary, Martin Barker The Friends of HMS Trincomalee, Jackson Dock, Maritime Avenue, Hartlepool TS24 0XZ E-Mail: [email protected] –– 22 –– Editorial At the time of writing this editorial, our negotiations with the National Museum of the Royal Navy are still in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Massachusetts Schooner
    1 Warren (1) Commander William Coas Schooner 2 August 1776-[] October 1776 Massachusetts Privateer Schooner (2) Commander John Coulston 21 October 1776-[] 26 December 1776 (3) Commander Silas Howell 3 September 1777-9 September 1777 Commissioned/First Date: 2 August 1776 Out of Service/Cause: 9 September 1777/captured by HM Frigate Unicorn Owners: (1) Joseph Foster, Winthrop Sargent and Epes Sargent, all of Gloucester, Massachusetts and John Winthrop, Jr. of Boston, Massachusetts; (2) John Coffin Jones of Newburyport, Massachusetts and Stephen Bruce of Boston, Massachusetts et al Tonnage: 70 Battery: Date Reported: 2 August 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 4/4-pounder 16 pounds 8 pounds 4/3-pounder 12 pounds 6 pounds Total: 8 cannon/28 pounds Broadside: 4 cannon/14 pounds Swivels: twelve Date Reported: 21 October 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 8/ Total: 8 cannon/ Broadside: 4 cannon/ Swivels: Date Reported: 1 December 1776 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 12/6-pounder 72 pounds 36 pounds Total: 12 cannon/72 pounds Broadside: 6 cannon/36 pounds ©awiatsea.com-posted August 2019 --1-- Swivels: twelve Date Reported: 3 September 1777 Number/Caliber Weight Broadside 10/ Total: 10 cannon/ Broadside: 5 cannon/ Swivels: Crew: (1) 2 August 1776: 53 [ total (2) 21 October 1776: 61 []total (3) 1 December 1776: 85 []total (4) 3 September 1777: 53 []total Description: Officers: (1) First Lieutenant Coas Gardner, 2 August 1776-; (2) First Lieutenant Benjamin Tucker, 3 September 1777-9 September 1777; (3) Second Lieutenant Moses Harris, 2 August1776-;
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period Kristin MacLeod Tomlin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Kristin MacLeod, "The Influence of the Introduction of Heavy Ordnance on the Development of the English Navy in the Early Tudor Period" (1980). Master's Theses. 1921. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1921 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF HEAVY ORDNANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENGLISH NAVY IN THE EARLY TUDOR PERIOD by K ristin MacLeod Tomlin A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis grew out of a paper prepared for a seminar at the University of Warwick in 1976-77. Since then, many persons have been invaluable in helping me to complete the work. I would like to express my thanks specifically to the personnel of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, England, and of the Public Records Office, London, for their help in locating sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Pier 17 Fender System Improvements Permit Application
    Pier 17 Fender System Improvements Permit Application Prepared for: South Street Seaport, LP 199 Water Street, 28th Floor New York, NY, 10036 McLaren No. 210036.00 March 2021 Prepared by: 530 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07677 Tel: (201) 775-6000 Fax: (201) 746-8522 TABLE OF CONTENTS Agency Submittal Information iii Project Narrative Section I New York District Section II United States Army Corps of Engineers Joint Application for Permit Environmental Questionnaire List of Adjacent Property Owners New York State Section III Department of Environmental Conservation Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEQR) Environmental Remediation Database Forms New York State Department of State Section IV Coastal Management Program Federal Consistency Assessment Form Addendum to Federal Consistency Assessment Form New York City Section V Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency New York City WRP Consistency Assessment Form Addendum to NYC WRP Consistency Assessment Form Flood Evaluation Worksheet Site Photos Section VI Drawings Section VII Essential Fish Habitat Worksheet Section VIII Previously Issued NYSDEC Permit Appendix A March 2021 Agency Submittal Information ii March 2021 Agency Submittal Information Attention: Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District Office (USACE) 26 Federal Plaza, Room 16-406 New York, NY 10278-0090 (917) 790-8511 Attention: Regional Permit Administrator New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) NYS DEC Region 2 1 Hunter’s Point Plaza 47-40 21st Street
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf
    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010)
    Department for Culture, Media and Sport Architecture and Historic Environment Division Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010) Compiled by English Heritage for the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites. Text was also contributed by Cadw, Historic Scotland and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland. s e vi a D n i t r a M © Contents ZONE ONE – Wreck Site Maps and Introduction UK Designated Shipwrecks Map ......................................................................................3 Scheduled and Listed Wreck Sites Map ..........................................................................4 Military Sites Map .................................................................................................................5 Foreword: Tom Hassall, ACHWS Chair ..........................................................................6 ZONE TWO – Case Studies on Protected Wreck Sites The Swash Channel, by Dave Parham and Paola Palma .....................................................................................8 Archiving the Historic Shipwreck Site of HMS Invincible, by Brandon Mason ............................................................................................................ 10 Recovery and Research of the Northumberland’s Chain Pump, by Daniel Pascoe ............................................................................................................... 14 Colossus Stores Ship? No! A Warship Being Lost? by Todd Stevens ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH ISSN: 1076-156X | Vol. 26 Issue 1 | DOI 10.5195/JWSR.2020.917 | jwsr.pitt.edu Coppering the Industrial Revolution History, Materiality and Culture in the Making of an Ecological Regime Daniel Cunha Binghamton University [email protected] Abstract No copper, no Industrial Revolution. Although accountants listed it in the very last position in the table of “value added” per sector in 1831, the British copper industry was essential for the Industrial Revolution, the period of British hegemony over the world-economy. In this article, I use the figure-ground method proposed by Terence K. Hopkins to show that the copper industry played key roles in the ecological regime of the 1700-1840 period, due to its material properties and related historical contingencies and cultural valuations. By focusing in on particular production processes, historical contingencies, and cultural phenomena in which copper played an important and unique role, and then zooming out again to the world-economy as a whole, I show that an Industrial Revolution would not have happened without copper. From sugar production in the Caribbean to textile printing, from the slave trade to the Battle of the Saintes, from the development of the steam engine to gin and rum production, from the telegraph to buckles and buttons, copper was conspicuous. This demonstrates the ecological regime of the period, in which the removal of a single commodity from the picture—i.e., copper—disrupts the whole constellation of relations. This study also shows that a “copper boom” immediately before and at the start of the Industrial Revolution (~1700-1800), instrumental in the British struggle against France for the hegemony over the world- economy, has been overlooked in the literature.
    [Show full text]