Antisthenes' Literary Fragments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antisthenes' Literary Fragments Antisthenes' Literary Fragments: Edited with Introduction, Translations, and Commentary William John Kennedy A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts University of Sydney 2017 1 Statement of Originality This is to certify that the content of this thesis is the product of my own work, that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources used have been acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. William Kennedy, April 2017 2 For Eric 3 4 CONTENTS Preface 7 Acknowledgements 9 Abbreviations & Fragment Numbering 10 INTRODUCTION 1 Biography of Antisthenes 1.i Antisthenes' Reputation in Antiquity and Today 12 1.ii Literature Review 15 1.iii Life of Antisthenes 24 2 Antisthenes' Ideology 2.i Antisthenes' a Cynic? 34 2.ii Antisthenes' Philosophy of Excellence and Justice 47 2.iii Antisthenes and Protagoras 61 3 Antisthenes and the Development of Ethopoiia 67 4 Antisthenes and the Birth of Dialogue 4.i The Development of Socratic Dialogue 75 4.ii Antisthenes as Dialogue Writer 94 5 Antisthenes as Literary Critic 102 6 Dating and Titling of Antisthenes' Works 111 7 A Note on the Approach to the Texts 117 TEXTS AND TRANSLATIONS Dialogica Varia (SD, CD, MD, ED) 120 Tragica & Homerica (TH) 146 Sympotica (Sy) 169 COMMENTARY Dialogica Varia (SD, CD, MD, ED) 174 Tragica & Homerica (TH) 221 Sympotica (Sy) 302 5 APPENDICES Appendix A - Antisthenes' Ajax & Odysseus 322 Appendix B - The Hippias Minor 330 Appendix C - Classification of the bombulios 333 Bibliography 337 Plate and Tables Plate 1 – Florentine Papyrus 113, column 2, lines 26-44 145 Table 1 – TH13 Comparison of Fragments Table 249 Table 2 – TH14 Comparison of Fragments Table 263 6 Preface This thesis deals with a significant portion of the most important fragments of Antisthenes. The closest companion of Socrates, Antisthenes was himself a major thinker and far-famed writer of the late fifth and early fourth centuries BC. A prolific author and an enormously influential figure in the fields of literature and ethical philosophy, the size of Antisthenes' output was matched only by his extraordinary creativity. As a result, in antiquity he enjoyed a stellar reputation. In modern times however, due largely to the inaccessibility of the fragments, he has been almost entirely neglected. As a collection, Antisthenes' fragments had never been translated in any modern language until 2011 (Spanish), had never been the subject of a commentary, nor, it turns out, had they even been edited with due care. Therefore, at the outset of this dissertation project, the intention was to produce an edition of all of Antisthenes' fragments, with translations, commentary and an introductory study. The first step was then to edit all the texts and produce translations. During this phase past editions of Antisthenes' fragments, and the best texts from which his fragments are sourced, were all consulted. It was surprising to discover how many fragments were untranslatable in the state they are printed in existing editions. Many required emendation to make sense of them, and in the process thirteen fragments were added to the corpus, and a further three fragments were significantly extended. It would be fair to say that while Antisthenes has occasionally been edited, he seems rarely ever to have been read. Once all of the fragments had been edited and translated, and the commentary was under way, it gradually became apparent that a full edition would turn out to be well beyond the acceptable length for a dissertation at The University of Sydney. Antisthenes was just so interesting and there was so much to say about his work that a decision had to be made to narrow the focus onto a naturally discrete portion of the fragments. Therefore it was decided to work on all the literary fragments (other than the Ajax & Odysseus, which had been discussed in detail in my previous dissertation: Kennedy 2011). The literary fragments are those that are not specifically philosophical and which show Antisthenes 7 contribution to Greek literary history. These fragments are in any case some of the most interesting, as they display Antisthenes' extraordinary variety and versatility. And to date, compared with his more philosophical fragments, they have been the most neglected. The literary fragments really throw positive light on all of Antisthenes' work and reveal pretty clearly that he needs a complete rethinking. It follows that a major goal of this thesis will be to demonstrate that Antisthenes, as a thinker, was at least as much a literary as he was a philosophical figure. Also, to show that in so far as Antisthenes was a philosophical figure, he was a Socratic through and through, holding ethical values consistent with the elite class he kept company with, and undeserving of his reputation as a founder of Cynicism. That reputation he only acquired in later antiquity, and yet it remains mostly unchallenged in modern scholarship. In demonstrating that Antisthenes was an important literary figure, this thesis will show that he played a seminal role in a range of literary innovations, including (but not limited to): the portrayal of character in prose writing; the development of dialogue form; and the deployment of a systematic method of literary criticism. In fact, a case can be made that Antisthenes was the first Greek writer of prose fiction. The genre of fiction he wrote, and which he used as a vehicle to convey his entire ethical programme, was dialogue. Amongst other innovations, he wrote dialogues interpreting Homer, and he deployed a greater variety of strategies in his dialogues than any of his contemporaries – e.g. including mythical characters and including himself as speakers. Antisthenes' great innovativeness, which others built on, was no doubt a contributing factor prompting ancient critics to level accusations of plagiarism against authors such as Plato and Aeschines of Sphettus. In short, Antisthenes was a Socratic philosopher and a major literary figure in his day, whose genre of choice was prose fiction, and more specifically prose dialogues. Antisthenes was known in antiquity as the equal of writers such as Plato and Xenophon and all of his work was part of a consistent and coherent programme. His thoughts therefore should not be considered as detached, discrete objects, and his achievements and contribution to literature and ethical philosophy should not be regarded as mere stepping- 8 stones to understanding someone else's thought. While Antisthenes was naturally a participant in the discourses of his time, his leading and innovative contributions to literature deserve to be considered in their own right. The intention is that this dissertation will provide a major step in that direction. Acknowledgements It is a great pleasure to thank those people who have helped make this dissertation what it is. All remaining misjudgements, errors and omissions are solely my responsibility. I wish to thank my examiners, in particular Andrew Ford and Elizabeth Irwin, for numerous helpful suggestions that have significantly improved the final dissertation. I am grateful to all of the academics of the Classics and Ancient History department at Sydney, and would especially like to mention Peter Wilson, Julia Kindt, Bob Cowan, Jelle Stoop, and Rick Benitez, who have all given me vital feedback, encouragement, and support. I would also like to thank the many friends whose company and conversation has sustained me over the course, including particularly Suzanne Bellamy, Paul Macovaz, Paul Touyz, Tatiana Bur, Gavin Molyneux, and my ever supportive fiancée, Mey Delvion. A few friends deserve special mention. Ben Brown, for his friendship and support at every turn, not to mention for introducing me to Classics, for which I owe him a substantial debt of gratitude. Adam Rowsell for good company, cricket conversations, being a splendid host during my weekly stays in Sydney, and for proofreading the final draft of this document. And my mother, Helen Small, for every kind of support imaginable, without which I would hardly have completed the project. Finally I wish to thank my supervisor, Eric Csapo, to whom this thesis is dedicated. It is impossible to imagine that I could have been more fortunate in my choice of mentor. His belief in my project, and the direction, enthusiasm, and support he has provided every step of the way has been extremely generous, not to mention inspirational. Billy Kennedy Braidwood 9 Abbreviations Agora Various editors. 1953- . Athenian Agora: Results of Excavations conducted by The American School of Classical Studies at Athens. Princeton. Corinth Various editors. 1929- . Corinth: Results of Excavations conducted by The American School of Classical Studies at Athens. Princeton. DC F. Decleva Caizzi. 1966. Antisthenis Fragmenta. Milan. Denniston, GP2 J. D. Denniston. 1954, 2nd. The Greek Particles. Oxford. FGrH F. Jacoby, et alii, eds. 1923- . Die Fragmente der greichischen Historiker. 4 parts. Berlin/Leiden. PCG R. Kassel & C. Austin, eds. 1983-95. Poetae Comici Graeci. 8 vols. Berlin. SSR G. Giannantoni. 1990, 2nd. Socratis et Socratorum Reliquae. 4 vols. Naples. Suda A. Adler. 1928-38. Suidae Lexicon. 5 vols. Leipzig. TrGF B. Snell et al., eds. 1971-2004. Tragicorum Graecorum fragmenta. 6 vols. Göttingen. TGL G. & L. Dindorf & C. Hase, eds. 1831-65. Thesaurus Graecae Linguae ab Henrico Stephano constructus. 9 vols. Paris. All other abbreviations for modern works and Latin authors follow those used in The Oxford Classical Dictionary (4th ed.), and abbreviations for Greek authors follow those in LSJ. Fragment numbering The fragments edited, translated and commented on in this thesis are arranged by category and numbered under the following classifications: SD Socratic Dialogues CD Contemporary Dialogues MD Mythic Dialogues ED Erotic Dialogues TH Tragica & Homerica Sy Sympotica 10 INTRODUCTION 11 1 BIOGRAPHY OF ANTISTHENES 1.i Antisthenes' Reputation in Antiquity and Today In antiquity, Antisthenes enjoyed an outstanding reputation as a thinker and as a prose stylist.
Recommended publications
  • The Astronomical Garden of Venus and Mars-NG915: the Pivotal Role Of
    The astronomical garden of Venus and Mars - NG915 : the pivotal role of Astronomy in dating and deciphering Botticelli’s masterpiece Mariateresa Crosta Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF- OATo), Via Osservatorio 20, Pino Torinese -10025, TO, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This essay demonstrates the key role of Astronomy in the Botticelli Venus and Mars-NG915 painting, to date only very partially understood. Worthwhile coin- cidences among the principles of the Ficinian philosophy, the historical characters involved and the compositional elements of the painting, show how the astronomi- cal knowledge of that time strongly influenced this masterpiece. First, Astronomy provides its precise dating since the artist used the astronomical ephemerides of his time, albeit preserving a mythological meaning, and a clue for Botticelli’s signature. Second, it allows the correlation among Botticelli’s creative intention, the historical facts and the astronomical phenomena such as the heliacal rising of the planet Venus in conjunction with the Aquarius constellation dating back to the earliest represen- tations of Venus in Mesopotamian culture. This work not only bears a significant value for the history of science and art, but, in the current era of three-dimensional mapping of billion stars about to be delivered by Gaia, states the role of astro- nomical heritage in Western culture. Finally, following the same method, a precise astronomical dating for the famous Primavera painting is suggested. Keywords: History of Astronomy, Science and Philosophy, Renaissance Art, Educa- tion. Introduction Since its acquisition by London’s National Gallery on June 1874, the painting Venus and Mars by Botticelli, cataloged as NG915, has remained a mystery to be interpreted [1]1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue with Tissue 2.0: How the Tree-To-Toilet Pipeline Fuels Our Climate Crisis
    JUNE 2020 R: 20-05-A REPORT THE ISSUE WITH TISSUE 2.0: HOW THE TREE-TO-TOILET PIPELINE FUELS OUR CLIMATE CRISIS AUTHORS Shelley Vinyard and Jennifer Skene ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors of this report would like to express their deep gratitude to all the people who made its publication possible. In particular, Ashley Jordan and Margie Kelly both played critical roles in the research and communication of the report’s findings. Anthony Swift oversaw the conceptualization and creation of this report. Leah Stecher, Tina Swanson, Lauren Gruber, and Joshua Mukhopadhyay’s diligence, patience, and expert edits elevated and refined this report. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the many people who reviewed the report and gave us valuable feedback: Jeff Wells, Tyson Miller, Darby Hoover, Jeff Conant, Joshua Martin, Merel van der Mark, Joshua Axelrod, Neva Murtha, Steve Blackledge, Ian Corbet, Debbie Hammel, and Mélissa Filion. Finally, the authors would like to thank the incredible campaigners and organizers who carry this work forward on the ground in Canada and the United States, in particular Jim Ace, Jen Mendoza, Hayley Berliner, and Gwen Nahnsen. This report is dedicated to Indigenous Peoples everywhere whose fight for self-determination on their lands and whose guardianship of those lands is creating a more just and sustainable future. ENDORSED BY: United States About NRDC NRDC is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Aelius Aristides , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.279
    BLOIS, LUKAS DE, The "Eis Basilea" [Greek] of Ps.-Aelius Aristides , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.279 The Ei~ BauLAea of Ps.-Aelius Aristides Lukas de Blois HE AUTHENTICITY of a speech preserved under the title El~ Ba­ T utAia in most MSS. of Aelius Aristides (Or. 35K.) has long been questioned.1 It will be argued here that the speech is a basilikos logos written by an unknown author of the mid-third century in accordance with precepts that can be found in the extant rhetorical manuals of the later Empire. Although I accept the view that the oration was written in imitation of Xenophon's Agesilaus and Isoc­ rates' Evagoras, and was clearly influenced by the speeches of Dio Chrysostom on kingship and Aristides' panegyric on Rome,2 I offer support for the view that the El~ BautAia is a panegyric addressed to a specific emperor, probably Philip the Arab, and contains a political message relevant to a specific historical situation. After a traditional opening (§ § 1-4), the author gives a compar­ atively full account of his addressee's recent accession to the throne (5-14). He praises the emperor, who attained power unexpectedly while campaigning on the eastern frontier, for doing so without strife and bloodshed, and for leading the army out of a critical situation back to his own territory. The author mentions in passing the em­ peror's education (1lf) and refers to an important post he filled just before his enthronement-a post that gave him power, prepared him for rule, and gave him an opportunity to correct wrongs (5, 13).
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Solon in Plato's Dialogues
    The Roles of Solon in Plato’s Dialogues Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Samuel Ortencio Flores, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Bruce Heiden, Advisor Anthony Kaldellis Richard Fletcher Greg Anderson Copyrighy by Samuel Ortencio Flores 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a study of Plato’s use and adaptation of an earlier model and tradition of wisdom based on the thought and legacy of the sixth-century archon, legislator, and poet Solon. Solon is cited and/or quoted thirty-four times in Plato’s dialogues, and alluded to many more times. My study shows that these references and allusions have deeper meaning when contextualized within the reception of Solon in the classical period. For Plato, Solon is a rhetorically powerful figure in advancing the relatively new practice of philosophy in Athens. While Solon himself did not adequately establish justice in the city, his legacy provided a model upon which Platonic philosophy could improve. Chapter One surveys the passing references to Solon in the dialogues as an introduction to my chapters on the dialogues in which Solon is a very prominent figure, Timaeus- Critias, Republic, and Laws. Chapter Two examines Critias’ use of his ancestor Solon to establish his own philosophic credentials. Chapter Three suggests that Socrates re- appropriates the aims and themes of Solon’s political poetry for Socratic philosophy. Chapter Four suggests that Solon provides a legislative model which Plato reconstructs in the Laws for the philosopher to supplant the role of legislator in Greek thought.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras
    The Classical Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ Additional services for The Classical Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras A. E. Taylor The Classical Quarterly / Volume 11 / Issue 02 / April 1917, pp 81 - 87 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800013094, Published online: 11 February 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009838800013094 How to cite this article: A. E. Taylor (1917). On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras. The Classical Quarterly, 11, pp 81-87 doi:10.1017/S0009838800013094 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ, IP address: 128.122.253.212 on 28 Apr 2015 ON THE DATE OF THE TRIAL OF ANAXAGORAS. IT is a point of some interest to the historian of the social and intellectual development of Athens to determine, if possible, the exact dates between which the philosopher Anaxagoras made that city his home. As everyone knows, the tradition of the third and later centuries was not uniform. The dates from which the Alexandrian chronologists had to arrive at their results may be conveniently summed up under three headings, (a) date of Anaxagoras' arrival at Athens, (6) date of his prosecution and escape to Lampsacus, (c) length of his residence at Athens, (a) The received account (Diogenes Laertius ii. 7),1 was that Anaxagoras was twenty years old at the date of the invasion of Xerxes and lived to be seventy-two. This was apparently why Apollodorus (ib.) placed his birth in Olympiad 70 and his death in Ol.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman & Early Christian Antiquity : Seeing the Gods
    9 Pilgrimage as Elite Habitus: Educated Pilgrims in Sacred Landscape During the Second Sophistic Marco Galli A Rita Zanotto Galli, con profonda amicizia e stima PATTERNS OF RELIGIOUS MEMORY AND PAIDEIA DURING THE SECOND SOPHISTIC Is it possible to reconstruct, at least in part, the suggestive and intricate frame that connected the monuments and images, the ritual actions, and the pilgrim who actively and subjectively participated as collector and observer of sacred experience? What indices permit us to trace the emotional reactions of pilgrims in contact with the sacred landscape? What mental processes and emotional reactions made the tangible objects (the monuments, the images, and the rites) into mental objects, and how did these become Wxed in the memory of the pilgrim? With these questions as guidelines, I shall argue that we can apply a contem- porary approach to the investigation of the social functions of ancient pilgrimage. For the exploration of the relationship between the religious experiences of the pilgrim and social instances of collective memory for the reconstruction and reactivation of a sacred traditional landscape, we may turn to a moment in history that provides an unusually dense 254 Marco Galli representation of the internal states of sacred experience.1 This is the period dubbed ‘The Second Sophistic’. It was a period virtually obsessed with the problem of memory, when even religious tradition, because it formed one of the most signiWcant communicative functions of collect- ive life, was subjected to fundamental revision within the process of social memory.2 Plutarch’s writings cast light on the role of memory and its interaction with religious tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Agorapicbk-17.Pdf
    Excavations of the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 17 Prepared by Mabel L. Lang Dedicated to Eugene Vanderpool o American School of Classical Studies at Athens ISBN 87661-617-1 Produced by the Meriden Gravure Company Meriden, Connecticut COVER: Bone figure of Socrates TITLE PAGE: Hemlock SOCRATES IN THE AGORA AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1978 ‘Everything combines to make our knowledge of Socrates himself a subject of Socratic irony. The only thing we know definitely about him is that we know nothing.’ -L. Brunschvicg As FAR AS we know Socrates himselfwrote nothing, yet not only were his life and words given dramatic attention in his own time in the Clouds of Ar- istophanes, but they have also become the subject of many others’ writing in the centuries since his death. Fourth-century B.C. writers who had first-hand knowledge of him composed either dialogues in which he was the dominant figure (Plato and Aeschines) or memories of his teaching and activities (Xe- nophon). Later authors down even to the present day have written numerous biographies based on these early sources and considering this most protean of philosophers from every possible point of view except perhaps the topograph- ical one which is attempted here. Instead of putting Socrates in the context of 5th-century B.C. philosophy, politics, ethics or rhetoric, we shall look to find him in the material world and physical surroundings of his favorite stamping- grounds, the Athenian Agora. Just as ‘agora’ in its original sense meant ‘gathering place’ but came in time to mean ‘market place’, so the agora itself was originally a gathering place I.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MYTH of ORPHEUS and EURYDICE in WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., Universi
    THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN LITERATURE by MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A., University of Toronto, 1953 M.A., University of Toronto, 1957 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY in the Department of- Classics We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, i960 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada. ©he Pttttrerstt^ of ^riitsl} (Eolimtbta FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES PROGRAMME OF THE FINAL ORAL EXAMINATION FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of MARK OWEN LEE, C.S.B. B.A. University of Toronto, 1953 M.A. University of Toronto, 1957 S.T.B. University of Toronto, 1957 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1960 AT 3:00 P.M. IN ROOM 256, BUCHANAN BUILDING COMMITTEE IN CHARGE DEAN G. M. SHRUM, Chairman M. F. MCGREGOR G. B. RIDDEHOUGH W. L. GRANT P. C. F. GUTHRIE C. W. J. ELIOT B. SAVERY G. W. MARQUIS A. E. BIRNEY External Examiner: T. G. ROSENMEYER University of Washington THE MYTH OF ORPHEUS AND EURYDICE IN WESTERN Myth sometimes evolves art-forms in which to express itself: LITERATURE Politian's Orfeo, a secular subject, which used music to tell its story, is seen to be the forerunner of the opera (Chapter IV); later, the ABSTRACT myth of Orpheus and Eurydice evolved the opera, in the works of the Florentine Camerata and Monteverdi, and served as the pattern This dissertion traces the course of the myth of Orpheus and for its reform, in Gluck (Chapter V).
    [Show full text]
  • Aelius Aristides As Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2019 Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults Josie Rose Portz University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Portz, Josie Rose, "Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Josie Rose Portz entitled "Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in English. Janet Atwill, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jeffrey Ringer, Tanita Saenkhum Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) AELIUS ARISTIDES AS ORATOR-CONFESSOR: EMBODIED ETHOS IN SECOND CENTURY HEALING CULTS A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Josie Rose Portz August 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my wonderful committee who has supported me these past two years in furthering my education in rhetorical studies, many thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations in Classics and Ancient History
    Citations in Classics and Ancient History The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. Quick guides for each of MLA and Chicago 2 are readily available as PDF downloads. The Chicago Manual of Style Online offers a guide on their web-page: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html The Modern Language Association (MLA) does not, but many educational institutions post an MLA guide for free access. While a specific citation style should be followed carefully, none take into account the specific practices of Classical Studies. They are all (Chicago, MLA and others) perfectly suitable for citing most resources, but should not be followed for citing ancient Greek and Latin primary source material, including primary sources in translation. Citing Primary Sources: Every ancient text has its own unique system for locating content by numbers. For example, Homer's Iliad is divided into 24 Books (what we might now call chapters) and the lines of each Book are numbered from line 1. Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers. The purpose of such a system is that the Iliad, or any primary source, can be cited in any language and from any publication and always refer to the same passage. That is why we do not cite Herodotus page 66. Page 66 in what publication, in what edition? Very early in your textbook, Apodexis Historia, a passage from Herodotus is reproduced.
    [Show full text]