By Neil Howe and William Strauss E"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Generations are among the most powerful forces in history. Tracking their march through time lends order -and even a measure of predictability -to long-term trends. by Neil Howe and William Strauss URINGTHE MIDDLEAGES, travelers reported an unusual ears of a young child to make sure he remembered that event all his life. Like those medieval villagers, each of us carries deeply felt as- sociations with various events in our lives. For Americans, Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy and King assassinations,the Challenger explosion, and 9/11 are burned into our consciousness;it is im- "E possible to forget what we were doing at the time. As we grow "c: :> older, we realize that the sum total of such events has in many 'cO ways made us who we are. Exactly how they affected us is related ~ to how old we were when they occurred. hbr.org I July-August 2007 I Harvard Business Review 41 MANAGING FORTHE LONG TERM I BIG PICTURE I The Next 20 Years This is what constitutes a generation: launched a "consciousness revolution" what public events they witnessed in It is shaped by events or circumstances to demand that their war-hero elders adolescence, and what social mission according to which phase of life its mem- live up to higher moral standards. they took on as they came of age. bers occupy at the time. ,As each gen- Twenty years later u.s. campuses Our focus as scholars has been on eration agesinto the next phase -from experienced another surprising shift. understanding generational personae youth to young adulthood to midlife to The Wall Streetjournal noted in 1990, and how they come together in soci- elderhood -its attitudes and behaviors "It is college presidents, deans, and ety to create a national character that mature, producing new currents in the faculties -not students -who are the continually evolves as new generations public mood. In other words, people zealots and chief enforcers of Political emerge and old ones pass away. This would be a fascinating study even if it were solely for the Rather than puzzling over why 20-year-olds were self-absorbed purposes of historical un- I ' . h 1960 b b d . k h . d derstanding. But its value is mora Izers In t e s ut are usy an rls -averse ac IE~vers to ay,., lar great er than that. What one must recognize them as members of distinct genera1:ions. we have found is that gen- erations shaped by similar early-life experiences often do not "belong" to their age brackets. Correctness."This batch of students, develop similar collective personae A woman of 40 today has less in com- GenerationX, wasborn during the con- and follow similar life trajectories. The mon with 40-year-oldwomen across sciousnessrevolution. The children of patterns are strong enough to support the agesthan with the restof hergener- divorce,latchkeys, and ad hoc daycare, a measure of prediCtability. Historical ation, whichis united by memories,lan- they showedmuch lessideological pas- precedent makes it possible to foresee guage,habits, beliefs, and life lessons. sionthan their eldersand brought a new how the generations alive today will Generationsfollow observablehis- pragmatismto the nation'scampuses. think and act in decadesto come. torical patterns and thus offer a very Todaygraying college leaders on the In this article we will share some powerful tool for predicting future vergeof retirement continue to carry highlights of our ongoing effort to do trends.To anticipatewhat 40-year-olds the ideologicaltorch, crusading for vari- just that. For businesspeoplewho man- will be like 20 years from now, don't ous causesin ways that often irritate age operations or sell products in the look at today's 40-year-olds;look at their youngerGen X colleagues.Mean- United States,the analysis offered here today's20-year-olds. while, undergraduates are showing has enormous implications for strate- Peopleof a givenage may vary quite yet another generational personality: gic planning, brand positioning, and dramaticallyfrom erato era. Recall,for The membersof this rising Millennial management of the workplace. (More example, Sproul Hall at UC Berkeley Generationtend to be upbeat,team- broadly, of course, it informs discus- in 1964and the studentswearing com- oriented, close to their parents,and sions of war and peace and America's puter punch cards that proclainled confident about their future. Unlike capacity to face its most difficult chal- "I Am a Student! Do Not Fold,Spindle, Boomers,they do not want to "teach lenges,) For executives in other coun- or Mutilate!" They were mocking the the worldto sing."Unlike GenXers.they tries, the analysis suggests insights automated treatment the university don't "just do it" -they plan ahead. that might also be gained in their parts was supposedlygiving them. In the Ratherthan puzzling over why 20- of the world: the insights that come yearsafter World War II, Americanshad year-oldswere self-absorbed moralizers from seeing change through the lens grown usedto the Silent Generation's in the 196osbut arebusy and risk-averse of generations. conformistcollege students. Now a new achieverstoday, one must recognize generationwas arriving: the babyboom them as members of distinct genera- The Generational Constellation raisedin the aftermath of the war. By tions. To learn why they (or any two Any society is the sum of its parts -the the end of the 1960sthese confronta- generations)are different,one can look generations that coexist at that mo- tional, megaphone-totingstudents had at how they were raised as children, ment in time. America today combines six. (Nineteen generationshave come of Neil Howe ([email protected]) and William Strauss ([email protected]) are age since the time of the Mayflower; in the authors of Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069 (1991). The the 1620S.See the exhibit "America asa Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy (1997), and Mi//ennials Rising: The Next Great Gen- Sequenceof Generations" for details.) eration (2000), among other books. and are the founding partners of LifeCourse Associates, The GI Generation (born 1901-1924, a publishing, speaking, and consulting company in Great Falls, Virginia. Visit hbr.org for addi- now age 83-106)arrived after the Great tional analysis by the authors regarding how current generations will rise to a national crisis. Awakening of the late nineteenth cen- 42 Harvard Business Review I July-August 2007 I hbr.org tury. Zealouslyprotected by progressive- -~ era parents, its members enjoyed a I "good kid" reputation and accounted I for the sharpest rise in school achieve- ment ever recorded. As-young adults, I they were the first Miss Americas and all-American athletes. In midlife they built up the postwar "affluent society," erecting suburbs, inventing miracle vaccines, plugging missile gaps, and launching moon rockets. Though they ! defended stable families and conven- tional mores, no generation in the his- tory of polling got along worse with its own children. They were greatly in- vested in civic life, and focused more on actions and behavior than on values and beliefs. Their unprecedented grip on the presidency (1961through 1992) began with the New Frontier, the Great Society, and Model Cities, but encom- I passedVietnam, Watergate, Iran-contra, and budget deficits. As "senior citizens" (a term popularized to describe them), the GIs safeguardedtheir "entitlements" but had little influence over culture and values. Early in this century they were honored with memorials, films, and books. Roughly half of those still alive rock and rollers, antiwar leaders, femi- were the indulged products of postwar are in dependent care. nists, public-interest lawyers, and men- optimism, Tomorrowland rationalism, The Silent Generation (born 1925- tors for young firebrands. They were and a Father Knows Best family order. 1942, now age 65-82) grew up as the America's moms and dads during the Though community spirit was strong seen-but-not-heard Little Rascals and divorce epidemic. They rose to political during their youth, the older genera- Shirley Temples of the Great Depres- power after Watergate, their congres- tions were determined to raise young sion and World War II. Its members sional behavior characterized by a push people who would never follow a Hitler, came of age just too late to be war he- toward institutional complexity and a a Stalin, or a Big Brother. Coming of roes and just too early to be youthful vast expansion of the legal process.To age, Boomers loudly proclaimed their free spirits. Instead they became, like date they are the first generation never scorn for the secular blueprints of their James Dean, "rebels without a cause," to elect a u.s. president or to appoint a parents -institutions, civic participa- part of a "lonely crowd" of risk-averse chief justice of the Supreme Court. As tion, and team playing -while seeking technicians in an era in which early elders, they have focused on discussion, inner life, self-perfection, and deeper marriage, the invisible handshake,and inclusion, and process(as with the Iraq meaning. The notion of a melting pot, climbing the career ladder seemed to Study Group's list of 79 recommenda- the full-time mom, the suburbs and big guarantee success.As gray-flannel con- tions) but not on decisive action. Ben- auto at home, and the troops and dom- formists, they acceptedthe institutional efiting more than other generations ino theory abroad all came under their civic life and conventional culture of have or will from ample late-in-life pay- withering criticism. During the Boom- the GIs until the mid-1960s,when they outs (defined-benefit pensions, retiree ers' youth, crime rates,substance abuse, stopped taking their cues from those health care, golden parachutes), they and sexual risk taking all surged while higher up on the age ladder and started have entered retirement with a hip life- academic achievement and SAT scores looking down -following Bob Dylan's style and unprecedented affluence.
Recommended publications
  • A History of the Baby Boomers

    A History of the Baby Boomers

    Book reviews Renewing the Family: A History of the Baby Boomers by Catherine Bonvalet, Céline Clément, and Jim Ogg New York: Springer Press 2015 ISBN: 978-3-319-08544-9 Hardcover, $129.00, 240 pp. Reviewed by Rosemary Venne Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan Renewing the Family: A History of the Baby Boomers represents a comprehensive examination of the baby boom generation in the context of family relations over the postwar period, charting the generation’s entire life cycle with a French and British comparative analysis of the first wave of the boom. This volume is part of a series of publications devoted to population studies and demography by the French National Institute for Demography (INED, Paris). The 2015 English version of the book is said to have some minor differences from the French edition, which was originally published in 2011. The authors, all based in France, are Catherine Bonvalet, a researcher at INED, Céline Clément, a researcher from Universite Paris (Ouest Nanterre), and Jim Ogg a sociologist and researcher at Caisse Nationale D’Assurance Vieillesse (CNAV) in Paris. This book is in the tradition of Great Expectations: America and the Baby Boom Generation by Landon Jones (1980), The Lyric Generation: the Life and Times of the Baby Boomers by François Ricard (1994), and Born at the Right Time: A History of the Baby-Boom Generation by Doug Owram (1996). The first book, Great Expectations, can be characterized as describing the American baby-boom generation from its babyhood until early adulthood, while the second can be described as an examination of the early wave of the baby boom and the societal changes in Canada, with an emphasis on the province of Quebec.
  • Presentation

    Presentation

    AIM Leadership Development Conference Sheraton New Orleans Hotel April 23‐24, 2015 This event is made possible through a Merck educational grant and with support from our partners at South Central Public Health Partnership and the Louisiana Public Health Institute. Thank YOU! Diane Thielfoldt Learning Strategist and Co‐ Founder The Learning Café 2 Leading a Multigenerational Workforce AIM Leadership Development Conference Diane Thielfoldt The Learning Cafe ©2015 The Learning Café meet the 4 generation workforce Silent Boomers Gen X Millennials 1933 - 1945 1946 - 1964 1965 - 1976 1977 - 1998 Cuspers 1960 - 1968 “Each generation has a shared history, common biases, and core beliefs.” 4 ©2015 The Learning Café shifting demographics Silents are past the traditional retirement age of 65. the labor force of those 65 to 75 is growing at a rate of 80% Silents are the most likely generation to read a daily newspaper and watch the news on television. 5 ©2015 The Learning Café shifting demographics Baby Boomers were the largest generation of children born in the US. The last 4.5 million Baby Boomers turned 50. 75 million Baby Boomers are redefining consumerism during the “Golden Years.” Boomers @65 AARP 6 ©2015 The Learning Café shifting demographics 65 % of Gen X is currently employed in full-time jobs. Gen X is the emerging management class in American Companies. Gen X is firmly in position as the leader of American parenting philosophy. 7 ©2015 The Learning Café shifting demographics The Millennials are now officially the largest and most influential adult population in American history. 8 ©2015 The Learning Café shifting demographics Professionals interact 85% with at least 3 other generations at work.
  • Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace

    Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace

    Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Mountain States Employers Council Evan Abbott Guess When? “Pupils entering school cannot write well. Their thoughts are immature, they are miserably expressed, and they do not know how to spell.” Guess Who? “The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority. They show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents and tyrannize their teachers.” 1 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Overview The Next Generations 1.0 Generations 2.0 Applications Workforce • Generations • Work Ethic and • Labor Market • Workplace Construct Commitment • Baby Boomers, • Work practices • Key Concepts • Communication Xers & & Technology Millennials Gen 1.0: What Do You Know? Silent Baby Generation Boomers Generation Millennials X Generational Peer group = a group whose members share a common historical location and have similar experiences Generation Born Raised Silent 1923-1946 30s, 40s, 50s Baby Boomers 1946-1963 50s, 60s, 70s Generation X 1963-1980 70s, 80s, 90s Millennials 1980-2000 90s - today 2 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Adversity Family Influences Diversity Organizations Economy Technology Gen 2.0 FACT Silent Baby Generation Boomers or Generation Millennials X FICTION 3 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Values Attitudes Beliefs Experiences Expectations Behaviors Communication & Technology Silent Generation X Baby Boomers Millennials Work Ethic Silent Baby Boomers Generation X Millenials 4 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace What’s Next? Silent Baby Generation Boomers Generation Millennials X The Next Workforce: Boomers No Longer in their “Prime” Move of the Median Here to stay .
  • The Post-80S Generation in Beijing: Collective Memory and Generational Identity

    The Post-80S Generation in Beijing: Collective Memory and Generational Identity

    SANDRA VALéRIE CONSTANTIN. The post-80s generation in Beijing 5 DOI: 10.2478/ijas-2013-0001 Sandra Valérie ConStantin UniVerSitY oF GeneVa The post-80s generation in Beijing: collective memory and generational identity Abstract This article questions the relevance of the notion of generation to describe the cohort who lives in Beijing and who was born in the 1980s and early 1990s, after the implementation of the reforms and opening-up policy in China. The analysis relies on 627 questionnaires collected in Beijing in 2010. The sample was stratified by age and sex, and, based on quotas; it was split into five age groups (18-26 year-olds, 33-41 year-olds, 48-56 year-olds, 63-71 year-olds and 78-86 year-olds). The respondents were questioned on their perception of turning points and socio-historical changes that occurred during their lifetime. After having analysed the data in a comparative perspective, we came to conclusion that the word generation is suitable to describe the young people from Beijing born in the 1980s and early 1990s not only because they do share autobiographical and collective historical memories, but also because these memories have by and large taken place between their adolescence and entry into adulthood (supporting the hypothesis of the existence of a reminiscence bump). Keywords: China, collective memory, generation, identity, life course, youth Theoretical framework Individual life course and History are strongly imbedded. Since the middle of the last century, sociologists have been seeking to understand the mechanics of this embedded-ness on micro-, meso-, and macro-socioeconomic levels.
  • Measuring and Explaining the Baby Boom in the Developed World in the Mid-20Th Century

    Measuring and Explaining the Baby Boom in the Developed World in the Mid-20Th Century

    DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 38, ARTICLE 40, PAGES 1189-1240 PUBLISHED 27 MARCH 2018 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol38/40/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.40 Research Article Measuring and explaining the baby boom in the developed world in the mid-20th century Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte © 2018 Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte. This open-access work is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany (CC BY 3.0 DE), which permits use, reproduction, and distribution in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are given credit. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/legalcode. Contents 1 Introduction 1190 2 Data and methodology 1191 2.1 Fertility indicators used 1191 2.2 Measurement of timing and volume 1192 3 Descriptive analysis of the timing and volume of the TBB 1194 4 What had the greatest impact on the TBB, the rise in marital 1202 fertility or the rise in nuptiality? 5 Descriptive analysis of the timing and volume of the BBM 1208 6 Explaining the BBM 1212 6.1 Previous explanations 1212 6.2 An alternative explanation: A new research proposal (back to the 1215 economic factors) 7 Conclusions 1221 8 Acknowledgments 1222 References 1223 Appendix 1229 Demographic Research: Volume 38, Article 40 Research Article Measuring and explaining the baby boom in the developed world in the mid-20th century Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte1 Abstract BACKGROUND The early research on the baby boom tried to account for it as a logical recovery following the end of the Second World War (WWII).
  • THE PROBLEM of GENERATIONS As to Be Capable of Choosing Rationally the Form of Government Most Suitable for Himself

    THE PROBLEM of GENERATIONS As to Be Capable of Choosing Rationally the Form of Government Most Suitable for Himself

    HOW THE PROBLEM STANDS AT THE MOMENT 277 forms of historical being. But if the ultimate human relationships are changed, the existence of man as we have come to understand it must cease altogether-culture, creativeness, tradition must all disappear, or must at least appear in a totally different light. Hume actually experimented with the idea of a modification of such ultimate data. Suppose, he said, the type of succession of human generations to be completely altered to resemble that of CHAPTER VII a butterfly or caterpillar, so that the older generation disappears at one stroke and the new one is born all at once. Further, suppose man to be of such a high degree of mental development THE PROBLEM OF GENERATIONS as to be capable of choosing rationally the form of government most suitable for himself. (This, of course, was the main problem I. HOW THE PROBLEM STANDS AT THE MOMENT of Hume's time.) These conditions given, he said, it would be both possible and proper for each generation, without reference A. THE POSITIVIST FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM to the ways of its ancestors, to choose afresh its own particular form of state. Only because mankind is as it is-generation follow• of investigation into his problem. All too often it falls to ing generation in a continuous stream, so that whenever one THEhis lotfirsttotaskdealofwiththe sociologiststray problemsis to toreviewwhichtheallgeneralthe sciencesstate person dies off, another is b-9rn to replace him-do we find it in turn have made their individual contribution without anyone necessary to preserve the continuity of our forms of government.
  • Talking About Whose Generation?

    Talking About Whose Generation?

    issue 6 | 2010 Complimentary article reprint Talking About Whose Generation? why western generational models can’t account for a global workforce By daVid hole, le zhong and jeff SChwartz > PhotograPhy By daVid ClugSton This publication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, its member firms, or its and their affiliates are, by means of this publication, render- ing accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your finances or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. None of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, its member firms, or its and their respective affiliates shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and its member firms. Copyright © 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 84 Talking About Whose Generation? Why Western generational models can’t account for a global workforce By DaviD Hole, le ZHong anD Jeff ScHwartZ > pHotograpHy By DaviD clugSton Deloitte Review deloittereview.com talking about Whose gener ation? 85 it is 8 pm in shanghai, and Kan, a marketing manager for a large global retailer has just gotten off of another call with a headhunter.
  • Are Millennials Really All That Different Than Generation X? an Analysis of Factors Contributing to Differences in Vehicle Miles of Travel

    Are Millennials Really All That Different Than Generation X? an Analysis of Factors Contributing to Differences in Vehicle Miles of Travel

    Are Millennials Really All That Different Than Generation X? An Analysis of Factors Contributing to Differences in Vehicle Miles of Travel Denise Capasso da Silva Arizona State University, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 Tel: 480-727-3613; Email: [email protected] Sebastian Astroza Universidad de Concepción, Department of Industrial Engineering Edmundo Larenas 219, Concepción, Chile Tel: +56-41-220-3618; Email: [email protected] Irfan Batur Arizona State University, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 Tel: 480-727-3613; Email: [email protected] Sara Khoeini Arizona State University, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 Tel: 480-965-5047; Email: [email protected] Tassio B. Magassy Arizona State University, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 Tel: 480-727-3613; Email: [email protected] Ram M. Pendyala Arizona State University, School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment 660 S. College Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-3005 Tel: 480-727-4587; Email: [email protected] Chandra R. Bhat (corresponding author) The University of Texas at Austin Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering 301 E. Dean Keeton St. Stop C1761, Austin TX 78712 Tel: 512-471-4535; Email: [email protected] and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong August 2019 ABSTRACT This paper is motivated by a desire to understand and quantify the extent to which millennials are truly different in their activity-travel behavior when compared with Generation X that preceded them.
  • GENERATION INFORMATION Adapted From: the Center for Generational Studies

    GENERATION INFORMATION Adapted From: the Center for Generational Studies

    GENERATION INFORMATION Adapted from: The Center for Generational Studies www.gentrends.com Baby Boomers (Born 1946-1964) Baby Boomers entered a thriving economy after WWII. The US had established itself as the preeminent power in the world. Factories were pumping out new cars and appliances. Houses were being built at a record pace. The proliferation of TVs in the 1950s forever changed the way that those growing up viewed the world. Boomers grew up feeling more secure than their parents. They began to question policies, rules and practices that had been in place for years. From this emerged civil rights protests, anti-war protests and a host of other rumbling that unsettled prior generations. Because of their size, this generation has received lots of attention. Companies focused their products. Politicians focused their messages. Rock and roll music took over the air waves. As a result, Boomers have grown up thinking the world is their oyster. As boomers entered the work place, they forever changed the way business was done. Many have taken advantage of college opportunities which raised the bar for many positions. Boomers focused on efficiency, teamwork, quality, and service. These efforts have produced a thriving “self-help” industry which feeds Boomers’ optimism and quest for eternal youth. The size of this generation continues to drive the economy and they place increasing emphasis on convenience. Financial security will remain a central issue for many, forcing thousands to work well past the age at which their parents retired. Their quest to remain eternally young will alter the face of lifestyles, the work force, consumer products, entertainment and public policy.
  • Women's Education and Cohort Fertility During the Baby Boom

    Women's Education and Cohort Fertility During the Baby Boom

    Women’s Education and Cohort Fertility during the Baby Boom Jan Van Bavel, Martin Klesment, Eva Beaujouan and (in alphabetical order) Zuzanna Brzozowska, Allan Puur, David Reher, Miguel Requena, Glenn Sandström, Tomas Sobotka, Krystof Zeman Abstract While today, women exceed men in terms of participation in advanced education, female enrollment rates beyond primary education were still very low in the first half of the 20th century. In many Western countries, this started to change around mid-century, with the proportion of women obtaining a degree in secondary education and beyond increasing steadily. The expected implication of rising female education was fertility decline and the postponement of motherhood. Yet, many countries experienced declining ages at first birth and increasing total fertility instead. How can we reconcile these fertility trends with women’s increasing participation in education? Using census and large survey data for the USA and fourteen European countries, this paper analyzes trends in cohort fertility underlying the Baby Boom and how they relate to women’s educational attainment. The focus is on quantum components of cohort fertility and parity progression, and their association with the age at first childbearing. We find that progression to higher parities continued to decline in all countries, in line with fertility transition trends that started back in the nineteenth century. However, in countries experiencing a Baby Boom, this was more than compensated by decreasing childlessness and parity progression after the first child, particularly among women with education beyond the primary level. As a result, the proportions having exactly two children went up steadily in all countries and all educational groups.
  • Generation X: Workplace Issues with Today’S Emerging Workforce

    Generation X: Workplace Issues with Today’S Emerging Workforce

    Generation X: Workplace Issues with Today’s Emerging Workforce Terry A. Sanders Abstract Generation X, those persons born between 1961 and 1981, are the emerging workforce of the 1990's and beyond. This generation is the first to be born into a world where both parents are working to make ends meet, Corporate America is downsizing to work "smarter", and the world is a tumultuous place to exist. The intricacies of this generation’s upbringing have contributed to the dichotomies that make the generation unique. They exhibit an air of independence while seeking constant input as to their work product; they covet the team approach to problem solving while relishing their time away to escape and ‘do nothing’ and they are easily bored and want to change tasks while wanting to be a part of the future of their workplace. The situation remains that this is the generation that is poised to take America into the 21st. Century. Our role is to blend our workplace ideology with the Generation X philosophy of life, a task that is as interesting as any journey that America’s workplace has endeavored to go. Introduction The management and leadership of a workplace is a formidable task. Personnel, with their specific needs and expectations are neatly balanced with the needs and expectations of an organization that provides a service or expects a profit. What happens when the emerging workforce does not ‘fit’ into the existing paradigms of a corporation or governmental entity? Can you find another workforce; can the emerging workforce be ‘changed’ by placing them along side the existing workforce with the hope they will pattern their concepts to the existing ones? Generation X, the emerging workforce of the 90's is pushing the envelope of workplace structure as they exercise their concepts of how things are done.
  • Quickstats: Expected Number of Births Over a Woman's Lifetime

    Quickstats: Expected Number of Births Over a Woman's Lifetime

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report QuickStats FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS Expected Number of Births over a Woman’s Lifetime* — National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1940–2018 4.0 3.5 n a m 3.0 o w r e p Replacement rate s 2.5 h t r i b d 2.0 e t c e p x E 1.5 Baby boomers Generation X Generation Y Generation Z born born (Millennials) born born 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 Year * The total fertility rate (TFR), the expected number of births that a woman would have over her lifetime, is the sum of the birth rates for women by 5-year age groups for ages 10–49 years in a given year, multiplied by 5 and expressed per woman. During 1940–2018, the expected number of births a woman would have over her lifetime, the TFR, was highest for women during the post- World War II baby boom (births during 1946–1964). In 1957, the TFR reached a peak of 3.77 births per woman. The TFR generally declined for the birth cohort referred to as Generation X from 2.91 in 1965 to 1.84 in 1980. For the birth cohorts referred to as Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation Z, the TFR first increased to 2.08 in 1990 and then remained generally stable until it began to decline in 2007. By 2018, the expected number of births per women fell to 1.73, a record low for the nation.