DOCSLIB.ORG

Protection of Cities from Small Rockets, Missiles, Projectiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protection of Cities from Small Rockets, Missiles, Projectiles 1 Article protection from Rocket after Josephv2 1 5 08 Protection of Cities from Small Rockets, Missiles, Projectiles and Mortar Shells Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F-6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718-339-4563, [email protected], http://Bolonkin.narod.ru Joseph Friedlander Shave Shomron, Israel 44858, [email protected] Abstract The authors suggest a low cost closed AB-Dome, which may protect small cities such as Sederot from rockets, mortar shells, chemical and biological weapons. The offered AB-Dome is also very useful in peacetime because it protects the city from outside weather (violent storms, hail) and creates a fine climate within the Dome. The roughly hemispherical AB-Dome is a gigantic inflated thin transparent film, located at altitude up to 1 – 5 kilometers, which converts the city into a closed-loop air system. The film may be armored with a basalt or steel grille or cloth pocket- retained stones that destroy (by collision or detonation) incoming rockets, shells and other projectiles. Such an AB-Dome would even protect the city in case of a third-party nuclear war involving temporary poisoning of the Earth’s atmosphere by radioactive dust. The building of the offered dome is easy; the film spreads on the ground, the fan engines turn on and the cover rises to the needed altitude and is supported there by a small internal overpressure. The offered method is cheaper by thousands of times than protection of a city by current anti- rocket systems. The AB-Dome may be also used (height is up to 1-5 and more kilometers) for TV, communication, long distance location, tourism, suspended high speed and altitude windmills (energy), illumination and entertainment (projected messages and pictures). The authors developed the theory of AB-Dome, made estimations, computations and computed a typical project. Discussion and results are at the end of the article. Key words: Protection from missile and projectile weapons, protection from chemical, biological weapon, inflatable structures, local weather control, mortar, rocket, Quassam defense, defence, isolation of GM crops, crop protection, pesticide free crops, biological isolation Note: Some background material in this article is gathered from Wikipedia under the Creative Commons license. Introduction One important problem in small countries with hostile borders (or larger countries with leaky borders) is protection of domestic targets from small rockets, missiles and mortar shells. For well over a hundred years there has been no satisfactory solution for this, which is why such weapons are favorites of guerilla groups. Israel, for example, has villages (Alumim, and dozens of others) towns (Sderot, Netivot and Qiryat Shemona), cities such as Ashqelon and numerous installations near unfriendly borders. For example, Sderot lies one kilometer from the Gaza Strip and the town of Beit Hanoun. Since the beginning of the Second Intifada in October 2000, Sederot has been under constant rocket fire from Qassam rockets launched by various armed factions. Despite the imperfect aim of these homemade projectiles, they have caused deaths and injuries, as well as significant damage to homes and property, psychological distress and emigration from the city. Real estate values have fallen by about half. The Israeli government has installed a "Red Dawn" alarm system to warn citizens of impending rocket attacks, although its effectiveness has been questioned. Thousands of Qassam rockets have been launched since Israel's disengagement from 2 the Gaza Strip in September 2005, which essentially has killed popular support for any further withdrawals, particularly from West Bank areas near the heart of the country. Even pro ‘land for peace’ parties have no plausible answer to the question (in its various forms), “And what will you do when they start shooting at (the) Tel Aviv (stock exchange) and the (Ben Gurion International) airport?” Thus, even with perhaps 70 of 120 votes in the Israeli Parliament (Knesset) in favor of negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, no final ‘end of conflict’ agreement is seriously in prospect, nor is likely to be given the impossibility of guaranteeing a stoppage of the bombardments by some unsatisfied Palestinian faction—even one not yet on the scene. In May 2007, a significant increase in shelling from Gaza prompted the temporary evacuation of thousands of residents. By November 23, 2007, 6,311 rockets had fallen on the city. The Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot reported that during the summer of 2007, 3,000 of the city's 22,000 residents (comprised mostly of the city's key upper and middle class residents, the heart of the economy, those most able to move,) had already left for other areas, out of Qassam rocket range. Russian-Israeli billionaire Arkady Gaydamak has in recent years supported relief programs for residents who cannot leave. [5] On December 12, 2007, on a day during which more than 20 rockets landed in the Sderot area, including a direct hit to one of the main avenues, the mayor of Sderot, Eli Moyal (a well-known figure in Israeli media) unexpectedly announced his resignation from the job, citing the government's failure to stop the daily rocket attacks. "Maybe this will spark the government to launch an operation for the lives of its [Sderot's] residents. I can't keep making the decisions, they can't keep piling it all on me," Mr. Moyal reportedly said. Later under political pressure, he was asked to resume his job by key national leaders, as a duty rather than a choice. Qassams were first fired at Israeli civilian targets in October 2001.The first Qassam to land in Israeli territory was launched on February 10, 2002. The first time an Israeli city was hit was on March 5, 2002, when two rockets struck Sderot. Some rockets have hit as far as the edge of Ashkelon. The total number of Qassam rockets launched exceeded 1000 by June 9, 2006. During the year 2006 alone, 1000+ rockets were launched. Tons of explosives have been intercepted at the Egyptian border; the uninterrupted shipments must be greater still, and the cumulative detonation yield has easily been in the tens of tons. The introduction of the Qassam rocket took Israeli politicians and military experts by surprise. Reactions have been mixed. The Israeli Ministry of Defense views the Qassams as "more a psychological than physical threat." The rockets are fired largely at civilian populations. There is some evidence of psychological damage to children in the effected areas, particularly in Sderot. The IDF has reacted to the deployment of the Qassam rockets by deploying the Red Color early warning system in Sderot, Ashkelon and other at-risk targets. The system consists of an advanced radar that detects rockets as they are being launched. Loudspeakers warn civilians to take cover approximately twenty seconds before impact in an attempt to minimize the threat posed by the rockets. A rocket once fell into the electricity station in Ashkelon and caused electricity shortages in several areas, other time a rocket-similar to Qassam- fell inside an army base and injured more than 70 Israeli soldiers. The Ashkelon strike in particular was troubling as it added (by its radius) another 250,000 Israelis to the potential target list requiring defenses to be paid for, active or passive. Some military bases of the USA in Afghanistan and Iraq (or in various parts of Asia and Latin America) are in the same situation. Any security consultant working to protect valuable installations in the more volatile corners of Africa, Latin America or Asia will recognize the dangers in the scenarios listed above. Rockets, and remotely triggered mortars, are man-portable and can be smuggled in, can be covertly emplaced and remotely fired with no appreciable warning, 3 and endanger billions in investment with mere thousands in expenses. In Gaza, bonuses are allegedly given to impoverished children to retrieve the launchers, to reduce the expenses of replacing both rounds and launchers. Israel Government plan. (As reported at www.haaretz.com 24/12/07 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/937756.html), the plan of the Israeli government was to fund an anti-missile system, but not to reinforce the homes of all Sderot-area residents, which caused considerable local anger. Many poorer residents don’t have a reinforced secure room they can retire to when the alarm sounds, with metal in the walls, proof against shrapnel. The Government’s position was that the promise to armor all the homes was made before it was understood that the anti-rocket system would cost the same 1.5 billion NIS (New Israeli Shekels) that reinforcing all the homes would. Critics object that the anti-rocket system may fail in at least a fraction of the cases to work, at which point those on the ground without a passive defense (a safe room) would be in mortal danger. Related articles: Security cabinet okays funding for 'Iron Dome' rocket defense system Defense Minister selects Rafael anti-missile defense system Sderot to keep 'special status' due to Qassam fire Court: State must brief court on plans to reinforce Sderot homes</A< span> The currently offered RAFAEL anti-rocket system is shown below: The RAFAEL anti-rocket system (Iron Dome) costs about 1 billion American dollars. It may be ready in 2011. Efficiency of operational system remains unknown. The other system, such as “David’s Sling” or C-RAM from Raytheon have perhaps 70 – 80% efficiency. That means every third to fifth missile would reach the target. From an investor’s standpoint, this would be little better than unchecked bombardament; capital would still flee the targeted city. What is needed is a defense so thorough that the residents are entirely unaware of the bombardament other than possibly distant flashes and evening news summaries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yeshivat Derech Chaim Kiryat Gat American Friends of Sderot  Amutat Lapid the Max & Ruth Schwartz Hesder Institutions Mission Statement
    ech Chaim er K i D r t y a a v t i G h s a e t Y The Friedberg Community Initiative Program The Yedidut-Toronto Foundation Yeshivat Derech Chaim Kiryat Gat American Friends of Sderot Amutat Lapid The Max & Ruth Schwartz Hesder Institutions Mission Statement Giving back to the community is no burden on our students – it is the direct, inescapable consequence of their studies here. It is not in vain that our Yeshiva is called "Derech Chaim" – the "Path of Life". We make every effort to make it clear to our students that the Torah that they study here is not theoretical – it is geared is to lead and direct them to take those same high ideals and put them into practice in their daily lives - in their hobbies, careers and life-choices. The Rashbi Study Partners Program Twice a week, Kiryat Gat Hesder students go to study Talmud and Parshat Shavua with young students at the nearby "Rashbi" Mamlachti Dati elementary school. Due to its proximity our students can now engage in this activity twice a week and the young children are in turn encouraged to visit the Yeshiva as well. In general, these children come from very economically and religiously challenged backgrounds. Having a "big brother" from the local Hesder Yeshiva is invaluable in building their respect for Torah and connecting them to proper role models. Community Rabbinate Program Amit L’Mishpacha A number of our Rabbis also serve as the beloved The Family Associate Program spiritual leaders of different local congregations. In this context, they are busy giving talks and lectures as well as helping families in their community in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Exo-Atmospheric Intercepts: Bringing New Challenges to Standard Missile
    G. A. SULLINS Exo-atmospheric Intercepts: Bringing New Challenges to Standard Missile Gary A. Sullins The Navy Theater Wide System is being designed to provide defense for U.S. forces and our Allies against medium- to long-range tactical ballistic missiles. As part of this system, a new variant of Standard Missile, SM-3, will be introduced to the Fleet. SM-3 will perform a hit-to-kill intercept of the ballistic missile while it is in exo-atmospheric flight (i.e., while outside the Earth’s atmosphere). Exo-atmospheric flight and hit-to-kill intercepts have brought new challenges to the SM Program. These challenges have intro- duced new technologies, which in turn have created the need for new tests to be added to an already robust SM ground test program. This article discusses these new challenges and describes tests geared to verify SM-3 design, with emphasis given to those tests performed at APL. INTRODUCTION The threat of ballistic missile attacks to U.S. forces and the ability of the combat system to engage them and our Allies continues to grow. Currently over 40 by guiding the missile to an intercept. Modifications are nations have the capability to launch ballistic missile being made to the AWS to change the logic consistent attacks. Most of these missiles are not capable of reaching with tracking and engaging ballistic missiles rather than U.S. soil; nevertheless, they do pose a significant threat its traditional Anti-Air Warfare role. to our forces stationed overseas. Many of these nations In addition to modifications to the AWS, the NTW also have the ability to build chemical, biological, or System is developing a new SM variant, SM-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Both Sides Retaliate in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict
    Both sides retaliate in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict Johannes Haushofera,1, Anat Biletzkib,c, and Nancy Kanwisherd,1 aInstitute for Empirical Economics, University of Zürich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland; bDepartment of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; cQuinnipiac University, Hamden, CT 06518; and dMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Contributed by Nancy G. Kanwisher, August 25, 2010 (sent for review June 30, 2010) Ending violent international conflicts requires understanding the imprisonment, blockades, and restrictions of movement by Israel causal factors that perpetuate them. In the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, against Palestinians. Any of these nonlethal forms of aggression Israelis and Palestinians each tend to see themselves as victims, engag- could either cause or constitute retaliation. Second, vector autore- ing in violence only in response to attacks initiated by a fundamentally gression asks whether killings of one side follow killings by the other and implacably violent foe bent on their destruction. Econometric side at a consistent time lag. However, given the lower level of or- techniques allow us to empirically test the degree to which violence ganization and technology of the various armed Palestinian factions, on each side occurs in response to aggression by the other side. Prior such time-locked responses may be difficult for Palestinians to ach- studies using these methods have argued that Israel reacts strongly to ieve; Jaeger and Paserman (8) suggest, alternatively, that Pales- attacks by Palestinians, whereas Palestinian violence is random (i.e., tinians may intentionally randomize the timing of their attacks not predicted by prior Israeli attacks).
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic Missile Defense Technology: Weapons, Power, Communications, and Space Transportation CONTENTS Page Introduction
    Chapter 5 Ballistic Missile Defense Technology: Weapons, Power, Communications, and Space Transportation CONTENTS Page Introduction . ......................105 5-6b. Boost and Post-Boost Kill Weapons . ..................,......105 Effectiveness (500 single-RV Kinetic-Energy Weapons (KEW) ....106 ICBMs atone site) . ...........117 Directed-Energy Weapons . .........123 5-7. Boost and Post-Boost Kill Power and Power Conditioning . ......142 Effectiveness (200 “medium- Space Power Requirements . ........142 bum-booster” ICBMs at one site). .............118 Space Power Generation Technology .143 5-8. Schematic of an Electromagnetic Power Conditioning . .. ..........145 Launcher (EML) or “Railgun” ..119 Communication Technology . .........146 5-9. Lightweight Homing Projectile. .l2l 60-GHz Communication Links .. ....147 5-10. Illustration of the Relationships Laser Communication Links . .......148 Between Laser Parameters and Space Transportation . ..............148 Power Density Projected on a Space Transportation Target . .............125 Requirements. ................149 5-11. FEL Waveforms . .............125 Space Transportation Alternatives ...149 5-12. Schematic of a Neutral Particle Space Transportation Cost Beam Weapon.. .............129 Reduction . ................153 5-13a. Annual Space Launch Capacity .152 Conclusions . ....................153 5-13b. Space Transportation . .........152 Weapon Technology Conclusions ....153 Space Power Conclusions. .........155 Tables Space Communications Conclusion. ..l55 Table No. Page Space Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • CERTIFICATE This Is to Certify That the Information Security Management System of HP INDIGO LTD
    CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the Information Security Management System of HP INDIGO LTD. 10, Einstein St. , Ness Ziona , Israel Has been assessed and complies with the requirements of : ISO/IEC 27001:2013 This Certificate is Applicable to Business processes: Development, manufacturing and technical support of HP Indigo products. System/products: The HP indigo information systems and services required to deliver and support HP Indigo digital presses, HP Production Pro servers (DFE) and software solutions. According to Statement of Applicability: Version: 2.0, Date: Jannuary 20th 2019 Certificate No.: 101898 Certificate Issue Date: 05/02/2019 Initial Certification Date: 05/02/2019 Certification Expiry Date: 04/02/2022 SII-QCD assumes no liability to any party other than the client, and then only in accordance with the agreed upon Certification Agreement. This certificate’s validity is subject to the organization maintaining their system in accordance with SII-QCD requirements for system certification. The continued validity may be verified via scanning the code with a smartphone, or via website www.sii.org.il. This certificate remains the property of SII-QCD. Ilan Carmit Avital Weinberg Acting Director General R.N 511468464 Director, Quality & Certification Division Page 1 of 2 Our Vision: To Enhance Both Global Competitiveness of our Services, with our Uncompromised Quality and Integrity Annex to Certificate of Registration no. 101898 HP INDIGO LTD. 10, Einstein St. , Ness Ziona , Israel With Additional Sites At: HP Indigo Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Forces
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • H. Res. 951 in the House of Representatives, U
    H. Res. 951 In the House of Representatives, U. S., March 5, 2008. Whereas more than 4,000 rockets and mortar shells have been fired at Israel from the Gaza Strip by Hamas and other terrorist organizations since Israeli forces withdrew from there in 2005; Whereas, since January 1, 2008, terrorists have fired nearly a thousand rockets and mortar shells into Israel; Whereas the near-daily rocket fire has been targeted pri- marily and intentionally at civilian communities in Israel, such as Sderot and Ashkelon, making life in such areas agonizing; Whereas the terrorist rockets have hit homes, schools, build- ings, roads, power lines, and other such infrastructure in Israel; Whereas these unprovoked rocket and mortar attacks have murdered over a dozen Israelis, inflicted hundreds of cas- ualties, produced thousands of cases of shock and post- traumatic stress, especially among children, and caused severe disruption of daily life; Whereas these deliberate cross-border rocket and mortar at- tacks on civilian populations constitute a blatant violation of human rights and international law; 2 Whereas those responsible for launching rocket attacks against Israel routinely embed their production facilities and launch sites amongst the Palestinian civilian popu- lation, utilizing them as human shields; Whereas intentionally targeting civilian populations and the use of human shields violates international humanitarian and human rights law; Whereas numerous reports have cited the copious amounts of sophisticated weapons, small arms, and weapons manu-
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Optimization of an Electromagnetic Railgun
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2018 DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC RAILGUN Nihar S. Brahmbhatt Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2018 Nihar S. Brahmbhatt Recommended Citation Brahmbhatt, Nihar S., "DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC RAILGUN", Open Access Master's Report, Michigan Technological University, 2018. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/651 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Controls and Control Theory Commons DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC RAIL GUN By Nihar S. Brahmbhatt A REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Electrical Engineering MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Nihar S. Brahmbhatt This report has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Electrical Engineering. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Report Advisor: Dr. Wayne W. Weaver Committee Member: Dr. John Pakkala Committee Member: Dr. Sumit Paudyal Department Chair: Dr. Daniel R. Fuhrmann Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments........................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 30 October 2020 SDEROT Shabbat Greetings to Everyone, I Feel That The
    Friday Evening Message – 30 October 2020 SDEROT Shabbat greetings to everyone, I feel that the Friday night message is a great idea by the community and hopefully it will continue beyond this time of craziness. I have recently started a new project myself which is reconnecting with friends who I haven’t spoken to for a while, there is nothing as nice as getting a message from someone who we haven’t heard from in ages, especially during these difficult days. So I have started to contact someone every week just to wish them Shabbat Shalom and check in with them. One of those who I have recently reconnected with was a dear friend Stewart Ganullin who happens to be the CEO of an organisation who I volunteered with on my many trips to Israel. Stewart is the amazing head of Hope for Sderot based in what is sadly known as the rocket capital of the world. The small “museum” of Kassam, Grad and Kadyusha rockets in the cities police station is a reminder of the over 16000 rockets to be fired from the nearby Gaza Strip to the civilian population 2km away in Sderot. The “rocket museum” located at Sderot police station. In the year preceding, to the year following, the Gush Katif disengagement rocket attacks on Sderot and surrounding Western Negev increased by ten-fold. Even though those who could afford to flee reducing the city population to less than 20000 it was allowed to retain city status and at the last year’s census had risen to almost 28000.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Danger from Gaza's Weapons Stockpile
    NatSec Brief - June 2021 JINSA’s Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy Evaluating the Danger from Gaza’s Weapons Stockpile Blaise Misztal - Vice President for Policy Charles Perkins - Director for U.S.-Israel Security Policy Jonathan Ruhe - Director of Foreign Policy Ari Cicurel - Senior Policy Analyst Yoni Weiner-Tobin - Research Intern The fighting between Israel and Gaza that took place from May 10-21, known in Israel as Operation Guardian of the Walls (OGW), proved that Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) maintain a large, diverse, and growing arsenal of projectiles of increasing range that can be fired in coordinated salvos intended to overwhelm Israel’s robust air defenses. These advancements in Palestinian rocket technology threaten Israel’s ability to deter future conflicts and defend against attacks when they occur; they are also a harbinger of the much more devastating potential conflict with Hezbollah on Israel’s northern front. Israel’s ability to deter and defend itself against these growing rocket arsenals, while abiding by the law of armed conflict, requires pairing advanced air defenses with offensive capabilities that can accurately target rocket production sites, depots and launchers spread widely across Gaza and embedded within densely-populated zones. The United States should support Israel’s deterrence by not only replenishing its supply of Iron Dome interceptors but also by expanding its air defense and precision munition capabilities. What Happened? • On May 10, terrorist organizations Hamas and PIJ began firing rockets and other unguided projectiles at Jerusalem. • In the 11-day conflict that followed, 4,428 rockets and missiles were fired from Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill No. 944
    FIRST REGULAR SESSION HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 944 101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1836H.02C DANA RADEMAN MILLER, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal section 571.030, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to unlawful use of weapons, with penalty provisions. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Section 571.030, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu 2 thereof, to be known as section 571.030, to read as follows: 571.030. 1. A person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons, except as 2 otherwise provided by sections 571.101 to 571.121, if he or she knowingly: 3 (1) Carries concealed upon or about his or her person a knife, a firearm, a blackjack or 4 any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any area where firearms are restricted under 5 section 571.107; [or] 6 (2) Sets a spring gun; [or] 7 (3) Discharges or shoots a firearm into a dwelling house, a railroad train, boat, aircraft, 8 or motor vehicle as defined in section 302.010, or any building or structure used for the 9 assembling of people; [or] 10 (4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of 11 lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; [or] 12 (5) Has a firearm or projectile weapon readily capable of lethal use on his or her person, 13 while he or she is intoxicated, and handles or otherwise uses such firearm or projectile weapon 14 in either a negligent or unlawful manner or discharges such firearm or projectile weapon unless 15 acting in self-defense; [or] 16 (6) Discharges a firearm within one hundred yards of any occupied schoolhouse, 17 courthouse, or church building; [or] EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted from the law.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel
    U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel Updated November 16, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33222 SUMMARY RL33222 U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel November 16, 2020 This report provides an overview of U.S. foreign assistance to Israel. It includes a review of past aid programs, data on annual assistance, and analysis of current issues. For general information Jeremy M. Sharp on Israel, see Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief, by Jim Zanotti. Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Israel is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II. Successive Administrations, working with Congress, have provided Israel with significant assistance in light of robust domestic U.S. support for Israel and its security; shared strategic goals in the Middle East; a mutual commitment to democratic values; and historical ties dating from U.S. support for the creation of Israel in 1948. To date, the United States has provided Israel $146 billion (current, or noninflation-adjusted, dollars) in bilateral assistance and missile defense funding. At present, almost all U.S. bilateral aid to Israel is in the form of military assistance, although from 1971 to 2007, Israel also received significant economic assistance. In 2016, the U.S. and Israeli governments signed their third 10-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on military aid, covering FY2019 to FY2028. Under the terms of the MOU, the United States pledged to provide—subject to congressional appropriation—$38 billion in military aid ($33 billion in Foreign Military Financing grants plus $5 billion in missile defense appropriations) to Israel.
    [Show full text]