DOCSLIB.ORG

The Coleoptera Families of British Columbia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Coleoptera Families of British Columbia The Coleoptera Families of British Columbia The Coleoptera Families of British Columbia G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings March 31, 2005 Deleted: 04/20/05 G.G.E. Scudder & R.A. Cannings Printed06/23/05 Coleoptera Families of British Columbia Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Deleted: 1 Keys and Descriptions to the Families of Coleoptera of British Columbia.....................................3 Deleted: 3 Order COLEOPTERA (Beetles)..................................................................................................3 Deleted: 3 Deleted: 28 DESCRIPTION OF FAMILIES................................................................................................28 Deleted: 28 Suborder ARCHOSTEMATA...................................................................................................28 Deleted: 28 Family CUPEDIDAE (Reticulated Beetles) [Fig. 1]............................................................ 28 Deleted: 28 Family MICROMALTHIDAE (Telephone-pole Beetles) [Fig. 2]....................................... 28 Deleted: 29 Suborder ADEPHAGA..............................................................................................................29 Deleted: 29 Family RHYSODIDAE (Wrinkled Bark Beetles) [Fig. 3]................................................... 29 Deleted: 29 Family CARABIDAE (Ground Beetles) [Fig. 4] ................................................................. 29 Family GYRINIDAE (Whirligig Beetles) [Fig. 5]............................................................... 30 Deleted: 30 Family HALIPLIDAE (Crawling Water Beetles) [Fig. 6] ................................................... 31 Deleted: 31 Family TRACHYPACHIDAE (False Ground Beetles) [Fig. 7] .......................................... 32 Deleted: 32 Family AMPHIZOIDAE (Trout-stream Beetles) [Fig. 8] .................................................... 32 Deleted: 32 Family DYTISCIDAE (Predaceous Diving Beetles) [Fig. 9] .............................................. 33 Deleted: 33 Suborder POLYPHAGA............................................................................................................34 Deleted: 34 Series STAPHYLINIFORMIA..................................................................................................34 Deleted: 34 Superfamily HYDROPHILOIDEA ...........................................................................................34 Deleted: 34 Family HYDROPHILIDAE (Water Scavenger Beetles) [Fig. 10]....................................... 34 Deleted: 34 Family SPHAERITIDAE (False Clown Beetles) [Fig. 11].................................................. 35 Deleted: 35 Family HISTERIDAE (Hister Beetles) [Fig. 12] ................................................................. 35 Deleted: 35 Superfamily STAPHYLINOIDEA ............................................................................................36 Deleted: 36 Family HYDRAENIDAE (Minute Moss Beetles) [Fig. 13] ................................................ 36 Deleted: 36 Family PTILIIDAE (Feather-winged Beetles) [Fig. 14] ...................................................... 37 Deleted: 37 Family AGYRTIDAE (Primitive Carrion Beetles) [Fig. 15] ............................................... 37 Deleted: 37 Family LEIODIDAE (Round Fungus Beetles) [Fig. 16]...................................................... 38 Deleted: 38 Family SCYDMAENIDAE (Antlike Stone Beetles) [Fig. 17]............................................. 39 Deleted: 39 Family SILPHIDAE (Carrion Beetles) [Fig. 18].................................................................. 39 Deleted: 39 Family STAPHYLINIDAE (Rove Beetles) [Fig. 19]........................................................... 41 Series SCARABAEIFORMIA...................................................................................................42 Deleted: 41 Deleted: 42 Superfamily SCARABAEOIDEA.............................................................................................42 Deleted: 42 Family LUCANIDAE (Stag Beetles) [Fig. 20] .................................................................... 42 Deleted: 42 Family GLARESIDAE (Enigmatic Scarab Beetles) [Fig. 21] ............................................. 43 Deleted: 43 Family TROGIDAE (Hide Beetles) [Fig. 22]....................................................................... 43 Family GEOTRUPIDAE (Earth-boring Scarab Beetles) [Fig. 23] ...................................... 44 Deleted: 43 Family OCHODAEIDAE (Sand-loving Scarab Beetles) [Fig. 24] ...................................... 44 Deleted: 44 Family GLAPHYRIDAE (Bumble Bee Scarab Beetles) [Fig. 25]....................................... 45 Deleted: 44 Family SCARABAEIDAE (Scarab Beetles) [Fig. 26]......................................................... 45 Deleted: 45 Series ELATERIFORMIA.........................................................................................................46 Deleted: 45 Superfamily SCIRTOIDEA.......................................................................................................46 Deleted: 46 Family EUCINETIDAE (Plate-thigh Beetles) [Fig. 27]....................................................... 46 Deleted: 46 Family CLAMBIDAE (Minute Beetles) [Fig. 28] ............................................................... 47 Deleted: 46 Deleted: 47 Coleoptera Families of British Columbia Deleted: 47 Deleted: 48 Family SCIRTIDAE (Marsh Beetles) [Fig. 29].................................................................... 47 Deleted: 48 Superfamily BUPRESTOIDAE.................................................................................................48 Deleted: 49 Family BUPRESTIDAE (Metallic Wood-boring Beetles) [Fig. 30].................................... 48 Deleted: 49 Superfamily BYRRHOIDEA.....................................................................................................49 Deleted: 50 Family BYRRHIDAE (Pill or Moss Beetles) [Fig. 31]........................................................ 49 Deleted: 50 Family ELMIDAE (Riffle Beetles) [Fig. 32] ....................................................................... 50 Deleted: 50 Family DRYOPIDAE (Long-toed Water Beetles) [Fig. 33] ................................................ 50 Deleted: 51 Family LIMNICHIDAE (Minute Marsh-loving Beetles) [Fig. 34]...................................... 50 Deleted: 51 Family HETEROCERIDAE (Variegated Mud-loving Beetles) [Fig. 35]............................ 51 Deleted: 52 Family PTILODACTYLIDAE (Ptilodactylid Beetles) [Fig. 36] ......................................... 51 Deleted: 52 Superfamily ELATEROIDEA...................................................................................................52 Deleted: 52 Family ARTEMATOPODIDAE (Artematopodid Beetles) [Fig. 37]................................... 52 Deleted: 53 Family EUCNEMIDAE (False Click Beetles) [Fig. 38] ...................................................... 52 Deleted: 53 Family THROSCIDAE (Throscid Beetles) [Fig. 39] ........................................................... 53 Deleted: 54 Family ELATERIDAE (Click Beetles) [Fig. 40] ................................................................. 53 Deleted: 55 Family LYCIDAE (Net-winged Beetles) [Fig. 41] .............................................................. 54 Family LAMPYRIDAE (Fireflies) [Fig. 42]........................................................................ 55 Deleted: 55 Family CANTHARIDAE (Soldier Beetles) [Fig. 43] .......................................................... 55 Deleted: 56 Series BOSTRICHIFORMIA ....................................................................................................56 Deleted: 56 Superfamily DERODONTOIDEA ............................................................................................56 Deleted: 56 Family DERODONTIDAE (Tooth-necked Fungus Beetles ) [Fig. 44] ............................... 56 Deleted: 57 Superfamily BOSTRICHOIDEA...............................................................................................57 Deleted: 57 Family NOSODENDRIDAE (Wounded-tree Beetles) [Fig. 45].......................................... 57 Deleted: 57 Family DERMESTIDAE (Dermestid Beetles) [Fig. 46]...................................................... 57 Deleted: 58 Family BOSTRICHIDAE (Bostrichids and Powder-post Beetles) [Fig. 47] ....................... 58 Deleted: 59 Family ANOBIIDAE (Deathwatch, Furniture and Spider Beetles) [Fig. 48] ...................... 59 Deleted: 59 Series CUCUJIFORMIA ...........................................................................................................59 Deleted: 60 Superfamily CLEROIDEA ........................................................................................................60 Deleted: 60 Family TROGOSSITIDAE (Bark-gnawing Beetles) [Fig. 49] ............................................ 60 Deleted: 60 Family CLERIDAE (Checkered Beetles) [Fig. 50].............................................................. 60 Deleted: 61 Family MELYRIDAE (Soft-winged Flower Beetles) [Fig. 51] ........................................... 61 Deleted: 61 Superfamily CUCUJOIDEA......................................................................................................61 Deleted: 61 Family SPHINDIDAE (Cryptic Slime Mold Beetles) [Fig. 52]........................................... 61 Deleted: 62 Family BRACHYPTERIDAE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management for Raspberry Beetle
    Integrated Pest Management for Raspberry Beetle Order: Coleoptera Family: Byturidae Species: Byturus unicolor The raspberry beetle, also known as the raspberry fruitworm, is a product contaminant pest found in raspberry fields in Washington. The larvae, or fruitworm, may fall off with the fruit during machine harvest. This pest has often been controlled by a diazinon treatment at 5% bloom, before pollinators are brought into the field. The United States Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to reduce the use of organophosphates, such as diazinon, through higher restrictions and cancellations. New monitoring tools for the raspberry beetle have been developed and tested in Whatcom County. The Rebell® Bianco white sticky trap can be used to detect raspberry beetle levels in a field. This may help in determining what treatment, if any, is Figure 1: Adult raspberry required for control of the pest. beetle on a raspberry bud Biology: The adult raspberry beetle is between 0.15 and 0.2” in length, a reddish brown color with short hairs covering its whole body (see figure 1). Overwintering in the soil, the adult emerges in the spring between mid-April and mid-May depending on soil temperatures. The adults feed on leaves, often on the new primocane leaves, but in areas of high populations they will also feed on upper floricane leaves. Adults are then attracted to flower buds and blooms where mating and, subsequently, ovipositing occurs. Larvae (or fruitworm) emerge from the eggs on the flower or immature fruit and begin feeding on the receptacle. The larvae are between 0.1” and 0.25” in length depending on the time of season.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 9.xii.2011 Volume 51(2), pp. 551–585 ISSN 0374-1036 A review of the Japanese Kateretidae fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Sadatomo HISAMATSU Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi 3–5–7, Matsuyama, 790–8566 Japan; e–mail: [email protected] Abstract. The family Kateretidae of Japan is revised. Nine species belonging to 6 genera are recognized, including: Kateretes japonicus Hisamatsu, 1985, K. takagii S-T. Hisamatsu, 2006, Platamartus jakowlewi Reitter, 1892, Heterhelus (Heterhelus) scutellaris (Heer, 1841), H. (Heterhelus) morio (Reitter, 1878), H. (Boreades) solani (Heer, 1841), Sibirhelus corpulentus (Reitter, 1900), Brachyp- terus urticae (Fabricius, 1792), and Brachypterolus pulicarius (Linnaeus, 1758). Heterhelus morio, which was synonymized under H. scutellaris by KIREJTSHUK (1989), is found to be a valid species, and is herein resurrected. Platamartus jakowlewi is newly recorded from Japan. Brachypterolus shimoyamai Hisamatsu, 1985, syn. nov., is synonymized under Brachypterolus pulicarius. Dorsal habitus images, illustrations of male and female genitalia, and other important diagnostic characters are provided for all species. A key for identifi cation of all Japanese taxa is also provided. Key words. Coleoptera, Kateretidae, taxonomy, new synonym, new record, key, Japan, Palaearctic Region Introduction The family Kateretidae, belonging to the superfamily Cucujoidea, is mainly distributed in the Holarctic Region, and comprises about 95 species within 14 genera worldwide (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010). Both larval and adult Kateretidae are anthophagous: the larvae are monophagous or oligophagous, while adults are more generalized feeders, occurring on true host plants only during mating and ovipositing periods; otherwise, they feed on a broader assortment of fl owering plants (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth Northwest Forests'
    AMER. ZOOL., 33:578-587 (1993) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth mon et al., 1990; Hz Northwest Forests complex litter layer 1973; Lattin, 1990; JOHN D. LATTIN and other features Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, tural diversity of th Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2907 is reflected by the 14 found there (Lawtt SYNOPSIS. Old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest extend along the 1990; Parsons et a. e coastal region from southern Alaska to northern California and are com- While these old posed largely of conifer rather than hardwood tree species. Many of these ity over time and trees achieve great age (500-1,000 yr). Natural succession that follows product of sever: forest stand destruction normally takes over 100 years to reach the young through successioi mature forest stage. This succession may continue on into old-growth for (Lattin, 1990). Fire centuries. The changing structural complexity of the forest over time, and diseases, are combined with the many different plant species that characterize succes- bances. The prolot sion, results in an array of arthropod habitats. It is estimated that 6,000 a continually char arthropod species may be found in such forests—over 3,400 different ments and habitat species are known from a single 6,400 ha site in Oregon. Our knowledge (Southwood, 1977 of these species is still rudimentary and much additional work is needed Lawton, 1983). throughout this vast region. Many of these species play critical roles in arthropods have lx the dynamics of forest ecosystems. They are important in nutrient cycling, old-growth site, tt as herbivores, as natural predators and parasites of other arthropod spe- mental Forest (HJ cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew Immelg Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew immelG Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gimmel, Matthew, "Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2857. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2857 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. REVISION AND RECLASSIFICATION OF THE GENERA OF PHALACRIDAE (COLEOPTERA: CUCUJOIDEA) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Matthew Gimmel B.S., Oklahoma State University, 2005 August 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the following individuals for accommodating and assisting me at their respective institutions: Roger Booth and Max Barclay (BMNH), Azadeh Taghavian (MNHN), Phil Perkins (MCZ), Warren Steiner (USNM), Joe McHugh (UGCA), Ed Riley (TAMU), Mike Thomas and Paul Skelley (FSCA), Mike Ivie (MTEC/MAIC/WIBF), Richard Brown and Terry Schiefer (MEM), Andy Cline (CDFA), Fran Keller and Steve Heydon (UCDC), Cheryl Barr (EMEC), Norm Penny and Jere Schweikert (CAS), Mike Caterino (SBMN), Michael Wall (SDMC), Don Arnold (OSEC), Zack Falin (SEMC), Arwin Provonsha (PURC), Cate Lemann and Adam Slipinski (ANIC), and Harold Labrique (MHNL).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
    November - December 2008 633 ECOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND BIONOMICS Wolbachia in Two Populations of Melittobia digitata Dahms (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) CLAUDIA S. COPELAND1, ROBERT W. M ATTHEWS2, JORGE M. GONZÁLEZ 3, MARTIN ALUJA4 AND JOHN SIVINSKI1 1USDA/ARS/CMAVE, 1700 SW 23rd Dr., Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected], [email protected] 2Dept. Entomology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; [email protected] 3Dept. Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2475, USA; [email protected] 4Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Ap. postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico; [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 37(6):633-640 (2008) Wolbachia en Dos Poblaciones de Melittobia digitata Dahms (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) RESUMEN - Se investigaron dos poblaciones de Melittobia digitata Dahms, un parasitoide gregario (principalmente sobre un rango amplio de abejas solitarias, avispas y moscas), en busca de infección por Wolbachia. La primera población, provenía de Xalapa, México, y fue originalmente colectada y criada sobre pupas de la Mosca Mexicana de la Fruta, Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae). La segunda población, originaria de Athens, Georgia, fue colectada y criada sobre prepupas de avispas de barro, Trypoxylon politum Say (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Estudios de PCR de la región ITS2 confi rmaron que ambas poblaciones del parasitoide pertenecen a la misma especie; lo que nos provee de un perfi l molecular taxonómico muy útil debído a que las hembras de las diversas especies de Melittobia son superfi cialmente similares. La amplifi cación del gen de superfi cie de proteina (wsp) de Wolbachia confi rmó la presencia de este endosimbionte en ambas poblaciones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A03v24n3.Pdf
    Revista peruana de biología 24(3): 243 - 248 (2017) ISSN-L 1561-0837 A New Species of DODECACIUS (Coleoptera: Elateridae) from Madre de Dios, Peru doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v24i3.13903 Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas UNMSM TRABAJOS ORIGINALES A New Species of Dodecacius Schwarz (Coleoptera: Elateridae) from Madre de Dios, Peru Una nueva especie de Dodecacius Schwarz (Coleoptera: Elateridae) de Madre de Dios, Perú Paul J. Johnson Insect Biodiversity Lab, Box 2207A, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Abstract Dodecacius Schwarz is reviewed, it includes two species known only from the eastern lower slopes of the Andes and adjacent Amazonia in southeastern Peru. Dodecacius paititi new species is described. Dodecacius testaceus Schwarz is treated as a new synonym of D. nigricollis Schwarz. Keywords: taxonomy; endemic; Andes; Amazonia; species discovery. Resumen El género Dodecacius Schwarz es revisado, incluye dos especies conocidas solamente de las laderas orientales bajas de los Andes y la Amazonia adyacente en el sureste de Perú. Se describe la nueva especie Dodecacius paititi y Dodecacius testaceus Schwarz es considerado como un nuevo sinónimo de D. nigricollis Schwarz. Palabras clave: taxonomía; endemismo; Andes; Amazonia; descubrimiento de especies. Publicación registrada en Zoobank/ZooBank article registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF42CC9C-F496-4B4F-9C1A-FBB413A43E02 Acto nomenclatural/nomenclatural act: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:84A545F1-FAF8-42C1-83DA-C9D90CA0CA39 Citation: Johnson P.J. 2017. A New Species of Dodecacius Schwarz (Coleoptera: Elateridae) from Madre de Dios, Peru. Revista peruana de biología 24(3): 243 - 248 (octubre 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Record of Fossil Solid-Wood-Borer Larvae—Immature Beetles in 99 Million-Year-Old Myanmar Amber
    Palaeoentomology 004 (4): 390–404 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.4.14 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F96DA9A-E2F3-466A-A623-0D1D6689D345 The earliest record of fossil solid-wood-borer larvae—immature beetles in 99 million-year-old Myanmar amber CAROLIN HAUG1, 2, *, GIDEON T. HAUG1, ANA ZIPPEL1, SERITA VAN DER WAL1 & JOACHIM T. HAUG1, 2 1Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Biocenter, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany 2GeoBio-Center at LMU, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 München, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-4229 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6963-5982 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-4445 �[email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-8777 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8472 *Corresponding author Abstract different plants, including agriculturally important ones (e.g., Potts et al., 2010; Powney et al., 2019). On the Interactions between animals and plants represent an other hand, many representatives exploit different parts of important driver of evolution. Especially the group Insecta plants, often causing severe damage up to the loss of entire has an enormous impact on plants, e.g., by consuming them. crops (e.g., Metcalf, 1996; Evans et al., 2007; Oliveira et Among beetles, the larvae of different groups (Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, partly Eucnemidae) bore into wood and are al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadwood and Saproxylic Beetle Diversity in Naturally Disturbed and Managed Spruce Forests in Nova Scotia
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysDeadwood 22: 309–340 and (2009) saproxylic beetle diversity in disturbed and managed spruce forests in Nova Scotia 309 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.22.144 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Deadwood and saproxylic beetle diversity in naturally disturbed and managed spruce forests in Nova Scotia DeLancey J. Bishop1,4, Christopher G. Majka2, Søren Bondrup-Nielsen3, Stewart B. Peck1 1 Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2 c/o Nova Scotia Museum, 1747 Summer St., Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada 3 Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada 4 RR 5, Canning, Nova Scotia, Canada Corresponding author: Christopher G. Majka ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jan Klimaszewski | Received 26 March 2009 | Accepted 6 April 2009 | Published 28 September 2009 Citation: Bishop DJ, Majka CG, Bondrup-Nielsen S, Peck SB (2009) Deadwood and saproxylic beetle diversity in naturally disturbed and managed spruce forests in Nova Scotia In: Majka CG, Klimaszewski J (Eds) Biodiversity, Bio- systematics, and Ecology of Canadian Coleoptera II. ZooKeys 22: 309–340. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.22.144 Abstract Even-age industrial forestry practices may alter communities of native species. Th us, identifying coarse patterns of species diversity in industrial forests and understanding how and why these patterns diff er from those in naturally disturbed forests can play an essential role in attempts to modify forestry practices to minimize their impacts on native species. Th is study compares diversity patterns of deadwood habitat structure and saproxylic beetle species in spruce forests with natural disturbance histories (wind and fi re) and human disturbance histories (clearcutting and clearcutting with thinning).
    [Show full text]