DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of City Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of City Planning DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING S UPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT City Planning Commission Case No.: CPC-2009-598-SP CEQA No.: ENV-2009-599-EIR Date: December 13, 2012 Incidental Cases: None Time: After 8:30 am Related Cases: None Place: City Hall Council No.: 1-Reyes 200 N. Spring Street, Room 350 Plan Area: Central City North Los Angeles, CA 90012 Northeast Los Angeles Silverlake/Echo Public Hearing: Public Hearings held Park/Elysian Valley August 30, October 11, and Specific Plan: None November 8, 2012 Certified NC: Lincoln Heights Historic/Cultural GPLU: Various Continued From : November 8, 2012 Zone: Various Applicant: City of Los Angeles Representative: City of Los Angeles PROJECT The project area is located in portions of the Central City North, Northeast Los LOCATION: Angeles, and Silverlake/Echo Park/Elysian Valley Community Plans. The project is bounded by the intersection of San Fernando Boulevard and Avenue 26 on the north; Pasadena Avenue and the Golden State Freeway (I-5) on the east; Main Street for the portion of the project east of the Los Angeles River (River) and the railroad right of way for the portion of the project west of the River on the south; and Broadway Boulevard on the west. The project area includes portions of the Chinatown and Lincoln Heights communities. The River and the Golden State Freeway bisect the project area north to south and the Arroyo Seco and Arroyo Seco Parkway run east to west through the northeastern section of the project area. The project area includes the Lincoln Heights/Cypress Park Goldline Station and immediately abuts the Chinatown Station and the Heritage Square Station in the southwest and northeast corners of the project area respectively. PROPOSED Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan: The Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan PROJECT: (Proposed Plan) revises land use and zoning, and introduces new building form, urban design, open space, parking, conservation, performance, and street standards to reflect recent shifts in existing conditions such as the opening of the Gold Line, the completion of the Los Angeles River Revitalization Master Plan (LARRMP), and the pending development of the Los Angeles State Historic Park (LASHP). The Proposed Plan includes revisions to the Citywide General Plan Framework Element, Transportation Element, and General Plan Land Use designations; Zone changes; and Street Reclassifications. REQUESTED 1. Pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code and City ACTIONS: Charter Sections 555 and 558, amend the Central City North, Northeast Los Angeles, and Silverlake/Echo Park/Elysian Valley Community Plans as part of the General Plan of the City of Los Angeles, as modified in the attached Plan Resolution (Exhibit A), the Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan, (Exhibit B) and CPC-2009-598-SP Page 2 Corresponding Zone and Land Use Changes (Exhibits C, F) 2. Pursuant to Section 12.32 of the Municipal Code, rezoning actions to effect changes of zone as identified on the Land Use Designation Map (Exhibit F) and Zone Change Map (Exhibit C). 3. Pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.5.6 of the Municipal Code and City Charter Sections 555 and 558, amend the Highways and Freeways Map of the Transportation Element of the General plan to reclassify selected streets within the Central City North, Northeast Los Angeles, and Silverlake/Echo Park/Elysian Valley Community Plans as shown on the Street Redesignation Matrix (Exhibit D- A2). RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Approve the Staff Report dated October 11, 2012 and this Supplemental Staff Report as the Commission’s report on the subject. 2. Approve and Recommend that the Mayor approve and the City Council adopt the attached Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan (Exhibit B), Land Use Change Maps (Exhibit C) amending the Central City North, Northeast Los Angeles, Silverlake/Echo Park/Elysian Valley Community Plans as part of the General Plan of the City of Los Angeles, as modified. 3. Approve and Recommend that the City Council adopt the requested zoning actions to effect the changes of zone as identified in the Zone Change Ordinance and Map (Exhibit D). 4. Instruct the Department of City Planning to finalize the necessary zone change ordinances to be presented to City Council, and make other technical corrections as necessary. 5. Authorize the Director of Planning to present the resolution (Appendix A) and Plan (Exhibit B) to the Mayor and City Council, in accordance with Sections 555 and 558 of the City Charter. 6. Amend the Highways and Freeways Map of the Transportation Element of the General Plan to reclassify selected streets within the Central City North, Northeast Los Angeles, Silverlake/Echo Park/Elysian Valley Community Plans as shown in the Street Modification Table in the Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan and the Modified Street Cross-Sections A2. in the Plan’s Appendices (Exhibit B). 7. Approve and Recommend that the City Council adopt the Administrative Code Amendment establishing the Cornfield Arroyo Seco Floor Area Trust Fund (Exhibit F). 8. Find that the City Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Environmental Impact Report ENV-2009-599-EIR (Appendix E) in its determination approving the Proposed Plan, and transmit the EIR to the City Council for certification . 9. Approve and Recommend that the City Council Adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations . TABLE OF CONTENTS Proposed Plan Analysis ............................................................................................ A-1 Proposed Plan Summary………………………………………………………….A-1 Background……………………………………………………… ……………….. A-1 Discussion of Key Issues………………………………………..........................A-2 Exhibits (Attached): A. Draft Resolution B. Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan + Appendices 1. Specific Plan 2. Appendices C. Proposed Land Use Designation Change Map D. Proposed Zone Change Ordinance and Map E. Final Environmental Impact Report (includes DEIR, RP-DEIR and Appendices) F. Administrative Code Amendment CPC-2009-598-SP A-1 PROPOSED PLAN ANALYSIS Summary On October 11 th and November 8 th 2012 the City Planning Commission (CPC) held public hearings on the Proposed Plan. At the October 11 th hearing there were 31 speakers, many of whom spoke in general support of the Plan but expressed concern over certain issues. Most of the concerns centered on the topics of affordable housing, public parking and protections for industrial development. Based upon the public testimony and subsequent deliberation, the CPC continued the item until November 8, 2012. At the November 8 th hearing, in light of the staff-suggested changes (see below) to parking and industrial design standards, there were 12 speakers, most of whom again spoke in general support but continued to express concern over a couple of remaining issues. Affordable housing continued to dominate the comments and a few developers and/or their representatives continued to press for specific modifications to address site-specific issues. Due to the affordable housing concerns raised on October 11 th the CPC formed an Ad Hoc Sub- Committee (Sub-Committee) of four commissioners to permit the opportunity for further discussion with developers and financing experts of affordable housing projects. The Sub- Committee met once with City Planning staff (staff) and affordable housing experts on October 22, 2012 to discuss concerns that the proposed residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.5:1 in the Urban Village would discourage the development of affordable housing. Subsequent to the October 11 th hearing, staff also worked closely with stakeholders to resolve concerns that particular standards with the Proposed Plan could unintentionally constrain parking flexibility and limit industrial development. Based upon the conversations with stakeholders, staff decided to eliminate the public parking requirement and adjust a variety of design standards to facilitate the expansion of light industrial development within the Plan area. These changes were introduced at the November 8 th hearing and are discussed in further detail below. In light of an independent analysis with respect to the impact of the 2.5:1 FAR on affordable housing (that was presented to the CPC on November 8 th) the item was once again continued in order to provide the development community and other stakeholders the opportunity to review the analysis which, along with other public comments submitted to the CPC, was posted on the Department’s website at: planning.lacity.org/ Ordinances/Proposed Ordinances/Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan. Background The Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan (Proposed Plan) is a regulatory land use ordinance as permitted by Section 11.5.7 of Volume 1 of the City’s Municipal Code. The City establishes specific plans to address area specific land use needs and concerns. The Plan is the result of several years of planning and community engagement that involved community workshops, meetings and conversations with residents, employers, property owners, and community business, and environmental organizations as well as staff input from numerous City, County, State, and federal departments. The Proposed Plan anticipates that by 2035 the population within the Proposed Plan could reach 31,855, that there could be a total of 8.776 units and that there could be a total of 10,546 jobs. As of 2007 the population within the Proposed Plan was 5,304 and there were 1,448 CPC-2009-598-SP A-2 housing units and 2,908 jobs. To enable this growth and to achieve the goals of the General Plan and the LARRMP the Proposed Plan establishes four new zoning districts: Urban Village, Urban Center, Urban Innovation, and Greenway (See Appendix B1- Zoning Districts Map). The Plan also includes an area-specific Density Bonus Option, a Community Benefit Option, and a Transfer of Floor Area (TFAR) program which together provide incentives for affordable housing, community benefits (open space, child care, library), and the preservation of lower- density industrial and residential uses, open space, and historic resources. The Plan includes a variety of standards addressing building form and massing, urban design, park, conservation, maintenance, noise, parking and streets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art Guide a Tour of Metro’S Artwork Metro Commissions Artists to Create Engaging and Thought-Provoking Artworks to Make Your Journey More Inviting and Pleasurable
    metro.net Art Guide A tour of Metro’s artwork Metro commissions artists to create engaging and thought-provoking artworks to make your journey more inviting and pleasurable. The artworks weave a multi-layered cultural tapestry that mirrors Los Angeles County’s rich contemporary and popular cultures. Established in 1989, the Metro Art program has commissioned over 250 artists for a wide variety of both temporary and permanent projects. explore Artists are selected through a peer review process with community input; all works are created especially for their transit related sites. This guide is intended to help you discover artworks throughout the Metro system. For more detailed information on the artwork and the artists, please visit metro.net/art. Artwork copyrighted, all rights reserved. Metro Lines and Transitways Metro Contents Art’s a Trip. Art’s a Trip Metro Environments Free Metro Rail Tours Tours are o=ered the >rst Saturday, > Thursdays – Meet at 7pm at Sunday and Thursday of each month. the street level entrance to the Metro Rail Metro Customer Center It’s free. It’s provocative. The tours are roundtrip and last Hollywood/Highland Metro l Metro Red Line Metro Vehicles It’s a great ride. approximately two hours. Rail Station. Union Station Bus Plaza l Metro Purple Line Tours for groups of 15 or more are > Saturdays – Meet at 10am at > Each tour is unique, visits l Metro Gold Line Metro Headquarters available by special arrangement. the street level entrance to the di=erent stations and is led Metro Division 3 Hollywood/Highland Metro by a member of the Metro Art l Metro Blue Line Call 213 .922.2738 for information Rail Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Line Final Report April 9, 2007
    Final Report GOLD LINE CORRIDOR STUDY March 2007 Prepared by Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies University of California, Los Angeles Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Principal Investigator Douglas Houston, Project Manager Ava Bromberg, Director of Fieldwork for Southern California Association of Governments 818 W. Seventh Street 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-3435 GOLD LINE CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared by Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies University of California, Los Angeles Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, Principal Investigator Douglas Houston, Project Manager Ava Bromberg, Director of Fieldwork Graduate Research Assistants Christine Aure Jane Choi Michelle Coulter John Kenyon Lily Song Paul Travis for Southern California Association of Governments 818 W. Seventh Street 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017-3435 The preparation of this report was funded in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration – under provisions of the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Additional financial assistance was provided by the California State Department of Transportation. Gold Line Corridor Study Final Report i Gold Line Corridor Study Final Report ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements iv Executive Summary 1 Section 1. Gold Line Corridor Baseline Profile and Trends 12 1.1 Overview of the Gold Line 12 1.2 Ridership Patterns 13 1.3 Demographic & Socioeconomic Characteristics and Trends of Station Areas 15 1.4 Housing Patterns of Station Areas 23 1.5 Commute Patterns of Station Areas 23 1.6 Jobs & Economic Base of Station Areas 27 1.7 Land Use Characteristics and Trends of Station Areas 31 1.8 Development Activity: Building Permit and Property Sale Patterns 43 1.9 Vacant Properties in Station Areas 50 1.10 Station Area Typologies Classifications 63 1.11 Development Goals & Plans 67 1.12 Overview of Development Projects 72 1.13 References 77 Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Seco Parkway National Scenic Byway Interpretive Plan
    Arroyo Seco Parkway National Scenic Byway Interpretive Plan May 2012 This plan was prepared for Mountains Recreation Conservation Authority This plan was prepared by Engaging Places, LLC, a design and strategy (MRCA) in partnership with Caltrans with funding provided by a grant firm that connects people to historic places. from the National Scenic Byway program, funded in part by Federal Highway Administration Max A. van Balgooy Engaging Places, LLC Mountains Recreation & Conservation Authority 313 Twinbrook Parkway 570 West Avenue 26, Suite 100 Rockville, Maryland 20851-1567 Los Angeles, CA 90065 (301) 412-7940 [email protected] (323) 221-9944 EngagingPlaces.net 1 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Section One: Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University College of Social Sciences
    FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY MULTI-SCALAR ASSESSMENT OF BUILT-ENVIRONMENT AND BUS NETWORKS INFLUENCE ON RAPID-TRANSIT PATRONAGE - THE CASE OF LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSIT NETWORK - By LUIS ENRIQUE RAMOS SANTIAGO A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Urban and Regional Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Luis Enrique Ramos Santiago defended this dissertation on June 19, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jeffrey Brown Professor Directing Dissertation Mark Horner University Representative Michael Duncan Committee Member John Felkner Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii I dedicate this doctoral dissertation to a group of special people who have supported me in a variety of ways throughout my doctoral studies. To my mother, Carmen Luz Santiago de Ramos, for her unrelenting love and support of my personal, professional, and intellectual pursuits. To my wife, Yasha N. Rodríguez Meléndez, for her continuous encouragement, patience, and work ethic. You have been and exemplary model to our daughter and myself as we make progress towards better life conditions from fast changing and uncertain economic circumstances at our homeland. To my parents-in-law, Don Angel Rodríguez and Doña Carmen Meléndez, for their continuous and unwavering support to my family and myself during the years of doctoral studies as well as preceding ones when our well-being and that of many other young Puerto Rican families was (and still is) challenged by exceptional economic and environmental circumstances, and where grandparents emerged as stable foundations from which a new generation of Puerto Ricans begin to rebuild a centuries-old noble, resilient, and unique nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Local Highways Final 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program
    Los Angeles County Local Highways Final 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County Project Listing Local Highway (in $000`s) Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LA0G230 Los Angeles SCAB 1AL04 NCRT3 L NON-REPORTABLE TCM 0 Description: PTC 20,000 Agency AGOURA HILLS U.S.101/PALO COMADO Interchange. Widen from 40' to ultimate width of 76'. One lane in each direction and one left-turn lane, Class II bike lanes (0.53 miles), sidewalks,and aesthetic enhancements. (widening is for left turn lanes only) Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 Total MEASURE R 20H - HIGHWAY 4,000 7,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 CAPITAL MEASURE M 9,000 9,000 4,000 4,000 1,000 9,000 LA0G230 Total 4,000 16,000 20,000 11,000 4,000 4,000 1,000 20,000 Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LAF7600 Los Angeles SCAB 1O1008 NCR10 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Description: PTC 1,028 Agency ALHAMBRA ALHAMBRA PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT/WALKING VIABILITY PROJECT ON VALLEY: (1) Installs ADA curb ramps. (2) Installs bus stop improvements, including pedestrian benches, covered shelters, trash cans, wayfinding/signage, crosswalk enhancements, pedestrian hybrid beacons, pedestrian lighting, pedestrian countdown signals, and removing obstructions from walkways. Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 Total CITY FUNDS 363 363 33 330 363 LOCAL TRANS FUNDS 665 665 60 605 665 LAF7600 Total 1,028 1,028 93 935 1,028 Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LAF3607 Los Angeles SCAB 1NL04 NCR25 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Description: PTC 2,379 Agency ARCADIA Arcadia Gold Line Station Pedestrian Linkage Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Cpc-2018-5580-Sp
    DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT City Planning Commission Case No.: CPC-2018-5580-SP CEQA No.: ENV-2009-599-EIR Date: January 10, 2019 Incidental Cases: None Time: After 8:30am Related Cases: CPC-2009-598-SP Place: City Hall Council No.: 1 – Cedillo 200 N. Spring Street, Room 350 Plan Area: Central City North, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Northeast Los Angeles, Silver Lake – Echo Park – Public Hearing: Limited Hearing Required. Public Elysian Valley Hearing held November 7, 2018. Specific Plan: Cornfield Arroyo (CASP) Appeal Status: Not Applicable Certified NC: Greater Cypress Park, Lincoln Heights, Los Expiration Date: March 17, 2019 Angeles Historic Cultural, Multiple Approval: N/A Echo Park GPLU: Various Zone: Various Applicant: City of Los Angeles PROJECT The project area is located in portions of the Central City North, Northeast Los Angeles, and LOCATION: Silverlake-Echo Park-Elysian Valley Community Plans. The project is bounded by the intersection of San Fernando Boulevard and Avenue 26 on the north; Pasadena Avenue and the Golden State Freeway (I-5) on the east; Main Street for the portion of the project east of the Los Angeles River (River) and the railroad right of way for the portion of the project west of the River on the south; and Broadway Boulevard on the west. The project area includes portions of the Chinatown and Lincoln Heights communities. The River and the Golden State Freeway bisect the project area north to south and the Arroyo Seco and Arroyo Seco Parkway run east to west through the northeastern section of the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Rapid-Transit Station-Level Ridership Determinants (Partial Table): Research Methods and Demographic / Socioeconomic Factors 1996-2013
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Multi-Scalar Assessment of Built- Environment and Bus Networks Influence on Rapid-Transit Patronage: The Case of Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Network Luis Enrique Ramos Santiago Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PUBLIC POLICY MULTI-SCALAR ASSESSMENT OF BUILT-ENVIRONMENT AND BUS NETWORKS INFLUENCE ON RAPID-TRANSIT PATRONAGE - THE CASE OF LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSIT NETWORK - By LUIS ENRIQUE RAMOS SANTIAGO A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Urban and Regional Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Luis Enrique Ramos Santiago defended this dissertation on June 19, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jeffrey Brown Professor Directing Dissertation Mark Horner University Representative Michael Duncan Committee Member John Felkner Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii I dedicate this doctoral dissertation to a group of special people who have supported me in a variety of ways throughout my doctoral studies. To my mother, Carmen Luz Santiago de Ramos, for her unrelenting love and support of my personal, professional, and intellectual pursuits. To my wife, Yasha N. Rodríguez Meléndez, for her continuous encouragement, patience, and work ethic. You have been and exemplary model to our daughter and myself as we make progress towards better life conditions from fast changing and uncertain economic circumstances at our homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 FTIP Amendments
    FOUND 452 PROJECTS 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County- 100% Prior Local Highway, State Highway, Transit Including Amendments 1 - 4 (In $000`s) FTIP ID LEAD AGENCY COUNTY CONFORM CATEGORY AIR BASIN PROJECT COST RTP ID SYSTEM LA0G610 Agoura Hills, City of Los Angeles EXEMPT - 93.127 SCAB $1,150 1AL04 Local PRIMARY PROGRAM CODE PROJECT LIMITS MODELING FTIP AMENDMENT NCRH1 - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS/CHANNELIZATION From NA to NA NO 21-00 DESCRIPTION The Kanan Road/Agoura Road Ultimate Intersection Improvements Project design consists of designing a signalized intersection that would improve circulation, reduce delays, facilitate large truck movements, reduce conflict points and be located and constructed within an area close in proximity to a freeway interchange and bordered on the north side by built-out and fully improved land. The Kanan Road/Agoura Road Ultimate Intersection Improvements Project was the former Roundabout project. PHASE FUND SOURCE PRIOR 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 FUTURE TOTAL PE MR20H - Measure R $1,130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,130 20% Highway ROW MR20H - Measure R $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20 20% Highway TOTAL TOTAL $1,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,150 FTIP ID LEAD AGENCY COUNTY CONFORM CATEGORY AIR BASIN PROJECT COST RTP ID SYSTEM LAF7600 Alhambra, City of Los Angeles EXEMPT - 93.126 SCAB $1,028 1O1008 Local PRIMARY PROGRAM CODE PROJECT LIMITS MODELING FTIP AMENDMENT NCR10 - PASSENGER BENCHES & SMALL SHELTERS From Atlantic Blvd to Garfield AVe NO 21-00 DESCRIPTION ALHAMBRA PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT/WALKING VIABILITY PROJECT ON VALLEY: (1) Installs ADA curb ramps.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Metro Summer Guide
    metro.net Summer Guide Go Metro Guía de verano SANTA MONICA PIER MANHATTAN BEACH CHINATOWN HOLLYWOOD HIGHLAND LONG BEACH AQUARIUM NOKIA THEATER AT LA LIVE Summer Guide Metro Red Line/Purple Line 9 Vermont/Sunset Station ● Metro Gold Line Metro Blue Line 1 Union Station ●●● Take the LADOT Griffith Observatory Shuttle, on 19 Union Station ●●● 30 Pico Station ● weekends only to: Barnsdall Art Park/Hollyhock House, Avila House, Olvera Street (El Pueblo de Griffith Observatory Avila House, Olvera Street (El Pueblo de LA LIVE, LA Convention Center, Lucky Strike Lanes Summer 2009 Los Angeles), Old Plaza Fire House, Olvera Street, Los Angeles), Old Plaza Fire House, Olvera Street, & Lounge, Nokia Theatre, Staples Center, Sepulveda House 10 Hollywood/Western Station ● Sepulveda House The Grammy Museum 2 Civic Center Station ●● Thai Town 20 Chinatown Station ● 31 103rd Street Station ● Take Dash A from 1st/Hill to: Ahmanson Theatre/Mark 11 Hollywood/Vine Station ● Chinatown Art Galleries, Old Chinatown, Los Angeles City Library, Watts Towers Art Center, Taper Forum, Dorothy Chandler Pavillion, Little Tokyo, Amoeba Music, Arclight Cinerama Dome, Ford Los Angeles State Historic Park Watts Towers of Simon Rodia Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA), Walt Disney Amphitheatre, Henry Fonda Theatre, Hollywood Walk 21 Lincoln/Cypress Station ● 32 Artesia Station ● Concert Hall, Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels of Fame, Los Angeles Fire Department Museum, Pantages Theatre Arroyo Seco Bike Path, Cypress Park, LA River Gateway Towne Center 3 Pershing Square Station ●● Center and Gardens Grand Central Market, Pershing Square Historic 12 Hollywood/Highland Station ● 33 1st Street Station ● 22 Heritage Square Station ● Center, Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Connect Socal Draft PEIR Plan Project List
    APPENDIX 2.0 Plan Project List For more information on transportation conformity and the interrelation between the plans and TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM the programs, please refer to Chapter 5 of Connect SoCal and the Transportation Conformity Analysis Technical Report. Project List FIGURE 1 RTP Framework FRAMEWORK The project list is divided into three sections, consistent with the framework in FIGURE 1. At the center is Strategic Plan the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), which forms the foundation of the RTP project investment strategy and represents the first six years of already-committed funding for projects requiring federal approval or those that are regionally significant. This RTP incorporates the adopted 2019 FTIP. The RTP contains an additional financially constrained set of transportation projects above and beyond the Financially Contrained FTIP. Finally, the Strategic Plan represents an unconstrained list of potential projects that the region would RTP pursue given additional funding and commitment. As part of the 2019 FTIP, projects from the 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and New Additional any subsequent STIP are reviewed for consistency with the RTP before inclusion into the adopted 2019 Funding FTi Invest- ments FTIP and upcoming 2021 FTIP. The STIP is comprised of the Interregional Transportation Program (ITIP) and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Reasonale Availale Funding or OM and Committed Please note that within the project list, the completion year for non-modeled projects that are exempt Projects from conformity may be inconsistent with upcoming 2019 FTIP amendments or the 2021 FTIP. Since these projects are exempt from conformity, changes in completion years are granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of City Planning to Amend Strategy B of the Affordable Housing Incentives in the Cornfield - Arroyo Seco Specific Plan (“CASP”)
    PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL CITY PLANNING CASE: COUNCIL DISTRICT: DOCUMENT: CPC-2018-5580-SP ENV-2009-599-EIR 1 - Cedillo PROJECT ADDRESS: The project is bounded by the intersection of San Fernando Boulevard and Avenue 26 on the north; Pasadena Avenue and the Golden State Freeway (I-5) on the east; Main Street for the portion of the project east of the Los Angeles River (River) and the railroad right of way for the portion of the project west of the River on the south; and Broadway Boulevard on the west. The project area includes portions of the Chinatown and Lincoln Heights communities. The River and the Golden State Freeway bisect the project area north to south and the Arroyo Seco and Arroyo Seco Parkway run east to west through the northeastern section of the project area. The project area includes the Metro Lincoln Heights/Cypress Park and Chinatown Gold Line Stations and abuts the Heritage Square Station in the southwest and northeast corners of the project area respectively. APPLICANT TELEPHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: CITY OF LOS ANGELES APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE TELEPHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: N/A APPELLANT TELEPHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: N/A APPELLANT’S REPRESENTATIVE TELEPHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: N/A PLANNER CONTACT INFORMATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: Gabriela Juarez, City Planner 213-978-1337 [email protected] ENTITLEMENTS FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Specific Plan Transmittal Rev 04/05/17 1 FINAL ENTITLEMENTS NOT ADVANCING: N/A ITEMS APPEALED: None ATTACHMENTS:
    [Show full text]