DOCSLIB.ORG

Diversity, Flexibility, and Creativity in Jewish Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diversity, Flexibility, and Creativity in Jewish Law A TREE OF LIFE THE LITTMAN LIBRARY OF JEWISH CIVILIZATION Dedicated to the memory of Louis Thomas Sidney Littman who founded the Littman Library for the love of God and as an act of charity in memory of his father Joseph Aaron Littman ͯ· ̯ÎÊ ‡‰È ‘Get wisdom, get understanding: Forsake her not and she shall preserve thee’ prov. 4: 5 The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization is a registered UK charity Registered charity no. 1000784 A TREE OF LIFE Diversity, Flexibility, and Creativity in Jewish Law ◆ second edition ◆ LOUIS JACOBS Oxford · Portland, Oregon The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization Chief Executive Officer: Ludo Craddock Managing Editor: Connie Webber PO Box 645, Oxford ox2 0uj, uk www.littman.co.uk ——— Published in the United States and Canada by The Littman Library of Jewish Civilization c/o ISBS, 920 N.E. 58th Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97213-3786 First published 1984 First issued in paperback with corrections and a new introduction 2000 Paperback reprinted 2007 First digital on-demand edition 2007 © Ivor Jacobs 1984, 2000, 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Littman Library of Jewish Civilization This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jacobs, Louis A tree of life : diversity, flexibility, and creativity in Jewish law / Louis Jacobs. p. cm.—(Littman library of Jewish civilization) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. 1. Jewish law—Philosophy. I. Title. II. Littman library of Jewish civilization (Series) BM520.6 .J33 2000 296.1Ј8—dc21 00–021942 ISBN 978–1–874774–48–8 Publishing co-ordinator: Janet Moth Production: John Saunders Design by Pete Russell, Faringdon, Oxon. Printed in Great Britain by Lightning Source UK, Milton Keynes and in the United States by Lightning Source US, La Vergne, Tennessee This book has been printed digitally and produced in a standard specification in order to ensure its continuing availability. For my grandchildren daniel, paula, ziva, noa, michael and abraham It is a tree of life to them that grasp it (prov. 3: 18). R. Banaah used to say: Whoever busies himself in the Torah for its own sake, his Torah becomes for him an elixir of life. Ta’anit 7a The benediction recited after the reading of the Torah is: ‘Who has given us a Torah of truth’— this refers to the Written Torah— ‘and has planted eternal life in our midst’— this is the Oral Torah. Shulh. an arukh,Orah. h. ayim 139: 10 Contents List of Abbreviations ix Introduction to the Second Edition xi A TREE OF LIFE INTRODUCTION Halakhah and Aggadah 3 1 The Talmud, Source of the Halakhah 14 2 The Spirit of Halakhah 25 3 Exemptions and Extensions 34 4 The Influence of Philosophy 42 5 The Influence of Mysticism and Kabbalah 59 6 Hasidism and Halakhah 72 7 Responses to the Gentile World 80 8 Halakhah and Sectarianism 93 9 Halakhic Responses to Social Change: General Principles 110 10 Halakhic Responses to Social Change: Further Examples 121 11 New Inventions and Discoveries and the Halakhah 152 12 Halakhah and Ethics 168 13 Halakhah and Social Conduct (Derekh Erets) 180 14 Halakhah and Psychology 186 15 Halakhah and Minhag: The Customs of the People as Law 206 16 Towards a Non-Fundamentalist Halakhah 220 APPENDIX A The Literary Form of the Halakhah 232 viii contents APPENDIX B The Problem of the Mamzer 239 Note on Proper Names and Transliteration 255 Note on Talmudic and Halakhic Sources 258 Bibliography 263 Index of Biblical, Mishnaic, and Talmudic References 283 General Index 291 List of Abbreviations AV Authorized Version of the Bible b. ben, son of Bah Joel Sirkes, author of Bayit h.adash BH Ba’er heitev, a commentary printed in most editions of the SA. The parts on OH and EH are by Judah b. Simeon Ashkenazi, the parts on YD and HM are by Zechariah Mendel b. Aryeh Leib Biur hagra a commentary by the Vilna Gaon on the Bible, Talmud, or SA and printed in major editions of these works BT Babylonian Talmud Chajes notes on the Babylonian Talmud, printed in the Romm edn. (Vilna, 1933) DS Dikdukei soferim (variant readings of the talmudic text by Raphael Nathan Rabbinovicz) EH Even ha’ezer (one of the four books comprising the SA) EJ Encyclopaedia Judaica ET Entsiklopediyah talmudit Hatam Sofer Moses Sofer, author of the H. atam sofer HM H. oshen mishpat (one of the four books comprising the SA) HUCA Hebrew Union College Annual JE Jewish Encyclopaedia JJS Journal of Jewish Studies JLA Jewish Law Annual JQR Jewish Quarterly Review JT Jerusalem Talmud Ketsot hah.oshen a commentary on SA, HM by Aryeh Leib b. Joseph Hakohen, printed in major editions of the SA KS Kiryat sefer Magid mishneh a commentary by Vidal Yom Tov of Tolosa on Yad, printed in most editions Maharik Joseph Colon Maharil Jacob b. Moses Moellin Mordekhai a halakhic compilation by Mordecai b. Hillel, printed in most editions of the Talmud after the text x list of abbreviations NEB New English Bible OH Orah. h.ayim (one of the four books comprising the SA) OP Otsar haposekim (a digest of responsa) OY Otsar yisrael, ed. J. D. Eisenstein (Berlin and Vienna, 1924) PT Pith.ei teshuvah (a commentary by Abraham Hirsch b. Jacob Eisenbach, printed in major editions of the SA) R. Rabbi Rabad Abraham ibn David Radbaz David ibn Abi Zimra Rambam Moses b. Maimon (Maimonides) Rema Moses Isserles Ran Nissim of Gerona Rashba Solomon Ibn Adret Rashbash Solomon b. Simeon Duran Rashi Solomon b. Isaac Ribash Isaac b. Sheshet Perfet Rid Isaiah di Trani Ridbaz Jacob David b. Ze’ev Willowsky Rif Isaac Alfasi Rif a commentary by Isaac Alfasi on the Babylonian Talmud, printed in the Romm edn. (Vilna, 1933) Ritba Yom Tov Ishbili Rosh Asher b. Jehiel Rosh a commentary by Asher b. Yehiel on the Babylonian Talmud, printed in the Romm edn. (Vilna, 1933) SA Joseph Caro’s Shulh.an arukh Semag Moses of Coucy, author of Sefer mitsvot gadol Sha’arei teshuvah a collection of geonic responsa Shakh Shabetai Hakohen, author of Siftei kohen Shelah Isaiah Horowitz, author of Shenei luh.ot haberit Taz David Halevi, author of Tur hazahav Yad Yad h.azakah (Maimonides’ Mishneh torah) YD Yoreh de’ah (one of the four books comprising the SA) Introduction to the Second Edition A Tree of Life first appeared in 1984. Reviewers and general readers found little with which to quibble in the book’s main contention that the traditional post-talmudic authorities developed the halakhah with diversity, flexibility, and creativity. What did cause offence, for both Orthodox and Reform critics, was the final chapter, ‘Towards a Non- Fundamentalist Halakhah’, which puts forward the view that it is both desirable and possible to preserve the halakhic system, albeit in a more dynamic form than in the past, even now that it has been demonstrated by the massive researches of the historical school that the halakhah did not simply drop down from Heaven but has had a history. I confess that I thought twice before adding this controversial and speculative chapter to the book, and was tempted to omit the chapter from this revised edition so as not to obscure the book’s basic thesis, which is that the traditional halakhists operated, consciously or subconsciously, in re- sponse to a felt need to make their halakhic decisions conform to their general stance on what Judaism demands of its adherents. Yet to have ignored the new historical challenge to the halakhic system would have been cowardly and dishonest. In this new introduction I try to defend the view presented in the final chapter against strictures from the right and left wings, as well as describing, at least in outline, further work that has been done by scholars in the area covered by the book as a whole. First, reference should be made to a book of the utmost relevance to the themes treated in A Tree of Life that has appeared in the Orthodox Forum series of the Rabbi Isaac Elhanan Theological Seminary, Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy.1 The basic problem to which the Modern Orthodox essayists in the book address themselves is to what extent a contemporary Orthodox rabbi can be innovative and creative in his halakhic decisions. These writers agonize in one way or another over the dilemma of Modern Orthodox rabbis who seek to follow the halakhic process typical of rabbis of the old school while accepting, unlike the latter, many of the values of Western thought and culture. 1 Edited by Moshe Z. Sokol. See also my review in the Jewish Journal of Sociology. xii introduction to the second edition The opening essay in this book exposes the flaws in the notion, preva- lent among the h.aredim or ultra-Orthodox today, that the gedolim (‘great ones’, chiefly the (unelected) members of the Council of Sages of Agudat Yisrael) have a kind of built-in guarantee that their opinions, even in political matters such as attitudes towards Zionism and the State of Israel, are as infallible as what the h.aredim call da’as torah, the view of the Torah, to reject which is to reject the very word of God.2 Far from such a view being traditional and Orthodox it is, in fact, modern, since it only emerged under the influence of hasidic veneration of the tsadik in the early twentieth century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Debate Over Mixed Seating in the American Synagogue
    Jack Wertheimer (ed.) The American Synagogue: A Sanctuary Transformed. New York: Cambridge 13 University Press, 1987 The Debate over Mixed Seating in the American Synagogue JONATHAN D. SARNA "Pues have never yet found an historian," John M. Neale com­ plained, when he undertook to survey the subject of church seating for the Cambridge Camden Society in 1842. 1 To a large extent, the same situation prevails today in connection with "pues" in the American syn­ agogue. Although it is common knowledge that American synagogue seating patterns have changed greatly over time - sometimes following acrimonious, even violent disputes - the subject as a whole remains unstudied, seemingly too arcane for historians to bother with. 2 Seating patterns, however, actually reflect down-to-earth social realities, and are richly deserving of study. Behind wearisome debates over how sanctuary seats should be arranged and allocated lie fundamental disagreements over the kinds of social and religious values that the synagogue should project and the relationship between the synagogue and the larger society that surrounds it. As we shall see, where people sit reveals much about what they believe. The necessarily limited study of seating patterns that follows focuses only on the most important and controversial seating innovation in the American synagogue: mixed (family) seating. Other innovations - seats that no longer face east, 3 pulpits moved from center to front, 4 free (un­ assigned) seating, closed-off pew ends, and the like - require separate treatment. As we shall see, mixed seating is a ramified and multifaceted issue that clearly reflects the impact of American values on synagogue life, for it pits family unity, sexual equality, and modernity against the accepted Jewish legal (halachic) practice of sexual separatiop in prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism
    eSharp Issue 20: New Horizons A Fresh Perspective on the History of Hasidic Judaism Eva van Loenen (University of Southampton) Introduction In this article, I shall examine the history of Hasidic Judaism, a mystical,1 ultra-orthodox2 branch of Judaism, which values joyfully worshipping God’s presence in nature as highly as the strict observance of the laws of Torah3 and Talmud.4 In spite of being understudied, the history of Hasidic Judaism has divided historians until today. Indeed, Hasidic Jewish history is not one monolithic, clear-cut, straightforward chronicle. Rather, each scholar has created his own narrative and each one is as different as its author. While a brief introduction such as this cannot enter into all the myriad divergences and similarities between these stories, what I will attempt to do here is to incorporate and compare an array of different views in order to summarise the history of Hasidism and provide a more objective analysis, which has not yet been undertaken. Furthermore, my historical introduction in Hasidic Judaism will exemplify how mystical branches of mainstream religions might develop and shed light on an under-researched division of Judaism. The main focus of 1 Mystical movements strive for a personal experience of God or of his presence and values intuitive, spiritual insight or revelationary knowledge. The knowledge gained is generally ‘esoteric’ (‘within’ or hidden), leading to the term ‘esotericism’ as opposed to exoteric, based on the external reality which can be attested by anyone. 2 Ultra-orthodox Jews adhere most strictly to Jewish law as the holy word of God, delivered perfectly and completely to Moses on Mount Sinai.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogma, Heresy, and Classical Debates: Creating Jewish Unity in an Age of Confusion
    Dogma, Heresy, and Classical Debates: Creating Jewish Unity in an Age of Confusion Byline: Rabbi Hayyim Angel Judaism includes the basic tenets of belief in one God, divine revelation of the Torah including an Oral Law, divine providence, reward-punishment, and a messianic redemption. Although there have been debates over the precise definitions and boundaries of Jewish belief, these core beliefs have been universally accepted as part of our tradition.[1] The question for believing Jews today is, how should we relate to the overwhelming majority of contemporary Jews, who likely do not fully believe in classical Jewish beliefs? Two medieval models shed light on this question. Rambam: Dogmatic Approach Rambam insists that proper belief is essential. Whether one intentionally rejects Jewish beliefs, or is simply mistaken or uninformed, non-belief leads to one’s exclusion from the Jewish community and from the World to Come: When a person affirms all these Principles, and clarifies his faith in them, he becomes part of the Jewish People. It is a mitzvah to love him, have mercy on him, and show him all the love and brotherhood that God has instructed us to show our fellow Jews. Even if he has transgressed out of desire and the overpowering influence of his base nature, he will be punished accordingly but he will have a share in the World to Come. But one who denies any of these Principles has excluded himself from the Jewish People and denied the essence [of Judaism]. He is called a heretic, an epikoros, and “one who has cut off the seedlings.” It is a mitzvah to hate and destroy such a person, as it says (Psalms 139:21), “Those who hate You, God, I shall hate.” (Rambam, Introduction to Perek Helek) Scholars of Rambam generally explain that Rambam did not think of afterlife as a reward.
    [Show full text]
  • An Autobiographical Sketch
    An Autobiographical Sketch My own personal concern for the relationship between human rights and religion stems from my upbringing and background. I was brought up in the Jewish tradition in Germany and became a refugee child in England at the age of three. My status as a refugee taught me that you can adapt to wherever you live, and in so doing experi- ence a breadth of human society which enriches you. is was made possible for me through the concerns and caring attitude of others. We kept the major Jewish holidays and went to synagogue, and although we were more liberal than orthodox, my father kept traditional values. Our family on my fa- ther’s side were partly of Sephardi origin. Sefarad is the old rabbinic word for Spain and Portugal, thus ‘Sephardi’ denotes those Jews whose ancestors hailed from Spain or Portugal and who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula in (Spain) and (Portugal) respectively. Many of the merchant families found refuge in North- Western European cities such as Amsterdam, Copenhagen, London and Hamburg. In Hamburg, the Sephardi Jewish community was the first Jewish group to be allowed to settle within that city, partly because they successfully pretended to be Portuguese Catholic merchants. Yet the community was quickly allowed to practise Judaism and, unusually, given permission to establish a synagogue, a privilege that local German Jews would not be accorded until the second half of the seventeenth century. e two communities were separate from very early on. Some of my family were thus part of a long Sephardi history in the midst of the northern ‘Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg’ which itself had a longstanding tradi- tion of trade and exchange all over the world, although my forefathers came from Copenhagen and Rendsburg, which was originally Danish before it became part of Prussia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Goren and the Disintegration of the Rabbanut • Chava Ginsburg Was Born in A
    Rabbi Goren and the Disintegration of the Rabbanut https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggljfAfREjU • Chava Ginsburg was born in a small town in Poland in the early 1920s. At around 14 years old, she met and eloped with a Polish Christian man, who, after converting, took the name Avraham Borokovsky. After living for a few months in Poland, the Borokovskys made Aliyah along with Chava’s parents sometime in the 1930’s. • Soon after they arrived in Israel, Chava and Avrohom’s marriage fell apart and they separated without obtaining a Get. This became problematic when Chava did not disclose this fact to the Beit Din that issued a license for her to marry her second husband, Otto Langer, in 1944. Two children, Chanoch and Miriam, were born to Otto and Chava Langer. • In 1951, Avraham Borokovsky and Chava Langer went to the Tel Aviv Beit Din in order to execute a Get before Borokovsky’s second wedding. The Beit Din, while investigating the facts of the case, discovered Chava’s second marriage, and subsequently banned Otto and Chava from living together. Otto passed away in 1952. • IN 1955 When Chava seeked to remarry, the status of her children became known, and they were declared Mamzerim by the Beit Din. • This status was upheld until 1966, when Chanoch Langer, then a soldier in the IDF, approached Beit Din to get married. When the Beit Din ruled he was a Mamzer, he brought the case to the Supreme Rabbinical Court of Appeals. He argued that Avraham Borokovsky did not undergo a valid conversion and that he was still a practicing Christian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Mirror: Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha
    The Greatest Mirror Heavenly Counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha Andrei A. Orlov On the cover: The Baleful Head, by Edward Burne-Jones. Oil on canvas, dated 1886– 1887. Courtesy of Art Resource. Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2017 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu Production, Dana Foote Marketing, Fran Keneston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Orlov, Andrei A., 1960– author. Title: The greatest mirror : heavenly counterparts in the Jewish Pseudepigrapha / Andrei A. Orlov. Description: Albany, New York : State University of New York Press, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016052228 (print) | LCCN 2016053193 (ebook) | ISBN 9781438466910 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781438466927 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Apocryphal books (Old Testament)—Criticism, interpretation, etc. Classification: LCC BS1700 .O775 2017 (print) | LCC BS1700 (ebook) | DDC 229/.9106—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016052228 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For April DeConick . in the season when my body was completed in its maturity, there imme- diately flew down and appeared before me that most beautiful and greatest mirror-image of myself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha
    t HaRofei LeShvurei Leiv: The Contemporary Jewish Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha Senior Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Undergraduate Program in Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Prof. Reuven Kimelman, Advisor Prof. Zvi Zohar, Advisor In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts by Ezra Cohen December 2018 Accepted with Highest Honors Copyright by Ezra Cohen Committee Members Name: Prof. Reuven Kimelman Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Lynn Kaye Signature: ______________________ Name: Prof. Zvi Zohar Signature: ______________________ Table of Contents A Brief Word & Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………... iii Chapter I: Setting the Stage………………………………………………………………………. 1 a. Why This Thesis is Important Right Now………………………………………... 1 b. Defining Key Terms……………………………………………………………… 4 i. Defining Depression……………………………………………………… 5 ii. Defining Halakha…………………………………………………………. 9 c. A Short History of Depression in Halakhic Literature …………………………. 12 Chapter II: The Contemporary Legal Treatment of Depressive Disorders in Conflict with Halakha…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 d. Depression & Music Therapy…………………………………………………… 19 e. Depression & Shabbat/Holidays………………………………………………… 28 f. Depression & Abortion…………………………………………………………. 38 g. Depression & Contraception……………………………………………………. 47 h. Depression & Romantic Relationships…………………………………………. 56 i. Depression & Prayer……………………………………………………………. 70 j. Depression &
    [Show full text]
  • Chabad Chodesh Marcheshvan 5771
    בס“ד MarCheshvan 5771/2010 SPECIAL DAYS IN MARCHESHVAN Volume 21, Issue 8 In MarCheshvan, the first Beis HaMikdash was completed, but was not dedicated until Tishrei of the following year. MarCheshvan was ashamed, and so HaShem promised that the dedication of the Third Beis HaMikdash would be during MarCheshvan. (Yalkut Shimoni, Melachim I, 184) Zechariah HaNavi prophesied about the rebuilding of the Second Beis HaMikdash. Tishrei 30/October 8/Friday First Day Rosh Chodesh MarCheshvan MarCheshvan 1/October 9/Shabbos Day 2 Rosh Chodesh MarCheshvan father-in-law of the previous Lubavitcher Shlomoh HaMelech finished building the Rebbe, 5698[1937]. Beis HaMikdash, 2936 [Melachim I, 6:35] Cheshvan 3/October 11/Monday Cheshvan 2/October 10/Sunday Yartzeit of R. Yisroel of Rizhyn, 5611[1850]. The Rebbe RaShaB sent a Mashpiah and "...The day of the passing of the Rizhyner, seven Talmidim to start Yeshivah Toras Cheshvan 3, 5611, was very rainy. At three in Emes, in Chevron, 5672 [1911]. the afternoon in Lubavitchn, the Tzemach Tzedek called his servant to tear Kryiah for Yartzeit of R. Yosef Engel, Talmudist, 5679 him and told him to bring him his Tefilin. At [1918]. that time news by telegraph didn't exist. The Rebbitzen asked him what happened; he said Yartzeit of R. Avrohom, son of R. Yisroel the Rizhyner had passed away, and he Noach, grandson of the Tzemach Tzedek, LUCKY BRIDES - TZCHOK CHABAD OF HANCOCKI NPARK HONOR OF THE BIRTHDAY OF THE REBBE RASHAB The fifth Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Sholom ular afternoon he remained in that position for DovBer, used to make frequent trips abroad a much longer time than usual.
    [Show full text]
  • Blogging Rav Lichtenstein
    BLOGGING RAV LICHTENSTEIN A JOURNEY THROUGH A GIANT’S WRITINGS AS THE SERIES ORIGINALLY APPEARED ON TORAHMUSINGS.COM by GIDON ROTHSTEIN Please note that throughout the text, RA”L, Rav Lichtenstein and R. Lichtenstein all refer to Rabbi Dr. Aharon Lichtenstein zt”l. Blogging Rav Lichtenstein: A Journey Through a Giant’s Writings © 2016 Gidon Rothstein. All Rights Reserved. Blogging Rav Lichtenstein INTRODUCTION AND INVITATION This past Rosh Chodesh Iyyar, the world of Torah and avodat Hashem lost a giant, mori ve-rabi R. Aharon I in ,ואני בעניי ,Lichtenstein. Many people are taking on important acts and learning projects in his memory my limited capabilities, wanted to join in that. The idea that came to me was to review R. Lichtenstein z”l’s published volumes. While he wrote more than many realize (here’s the bibliography), there are, as far as I know, thirteen books he wrote or that were based on his talks. Eight of those are notes on shiurim he gave at Yeshivat Har Etzion, one is a collection, Minchat Aviv, of articles he published, and four volumes (By His Light, two volumes of Leaves of Faith, and Varieties of Religious Experience) collect English language talks he gave or articles he wrote. As I try to review for myself some of the fruit of R. Lichtenstein’s toiling and tilling in the garden of Torah, I hope to share one stimulating idea a week. I make no pretense that I will be comprehensive, will capture all or a representative sample of what is found in those works, only that I can, in a few hundred words, share a thought worth knowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewishness, Birth and Giyyur
    1 Zvi Zohar All Jews are Jews by Birth Biblical and Rabbinic Judaism agree, that anyone born to the appropriate Jewish parent – is Jewish. To most Jews, it sounds quite reasonable for Jewishness to derive from birth. However, such a determination is far from self-evident. Consider a counter-example: if a person was born on a kibbutz, and her two parents are members of the kibbutz, she is not automatically a member. Rather, upon reaching a certain age, she must decide if she wishes to apply for membership. If she applies, her application comes up for discussion by the kibbutz assembly, who then decide the matter by a vote. While it is reasonable to assume that a child born and grown on the kibbutz will be accepted for membership if she applies, it is not automatic. The important point (in the current context) is, that her membership is contingent upon at least two decisions: her decision to apply, and the assembly’s decision to accept her. In contrast, Jewishness is not contingent upon any person’s decision, but is regarded by tradition as a ‘fact of birth’. The sources of this self-understanding are very ancient: in the Bible, the Israelites are the “Children of Israel”, i.e., the lineal descendents of the Patriarch Jacob and his twelve sons. In the bible, then, the People of Israel are made up of persons born into a (very) extended family. Some notions accepted in Biblical times were abrogated or modified by the Oral Torah (Torah she- b’al peh); significantly, the concept of the familial nature of Jewishness was not only retained, but also even reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Dissertation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Arbiters of the Afterlife: Olam Haba, Torah and Rabbinic Authority A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Candice Liliane Levy 2013 © Copyright by Candice Liliane Levy 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Arbiters of the Afterlife: Olam Haba, Torah and Rabbinic Authority by Candice Liliane Levy Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Carol Bakhos, Chair As the primary stratum of the rabbinic corpus, the Mishna establishes a dynamic between rabbinic authority and olam haba that sets the course for all subsequent rabbinic discussions of the idea. The Mishna Sanhedrin presents the rabbis as arbiters of the afterlife, who regulate its access by excluding a set of individuals whose beliefs or practices undermine the nature of rabbinic authority and their tradition. In doing so, the Mishna evinces the foundational tenets of rabbinic Judaism and delineates the boundaries of ‘Israel’ according to the rabbis. Consequently, as arbiters of the afterlife, the rabbis constitute Israel and establish normative thought and practice in this world by means of the world to come. ii There have been surprisingly few studies on the afterlife in rabbinic literature. Many of the scholars who have undertaken to explore the afterlife in Judaism have themselves remarked upon the dearth of attention this subject has received. For the most part, scholars have sought to identify what the rabbis believed with regard to the afterlife and how they envisioned its experience, rather than why they held such beliefs or how the afterlife functioned within the rabbinic tradition.
    [Show full text]