Anderson, Michael G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
From the History of Polish-Austrian Diplomacy in the 1970S
PRZEGLĄD ZACHODNI I, 2017 AGNIESZKA KISZTELIŃSKA-WĘGRZYŃSKA Łódź FROM THE HISTORY OF POLISH-AUSTRIAN DIPLOMACY IN THE 1970S. AUSTRIAN CHANCELLOR BRUNO KREISKY’S VISITS TO POLAND Polish-Austrian relations after World War II developed in an atmosphere of mutu- al interest and restrained political support. During the Cold War, the Polish People’s Republic and the Republic of Austria were on the opposite sides of the Iron Curtain; however, after 1945 both countries sought mutual recognition and trade cooperation. For more than 10 years following the establishment of diplomatic relations between Austria and Poland, there had been no meetings at the highest level.1 The first con- tact took place when the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bruno Kreisky, came on a visit to Warsaw on 1-3 March 1960.2 Later on, Kreisky visited Poland four times as Chancellor of Austria: in June 1973, in late January/early February 1975, in Sep- tember 1976, and in November 1979. While discussing the significance of those five visits, it is worth reflecting on the role of Austria in the diplomatic activity of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The views on the motives of the Austrian politician’s actions and on Austria’s foreign policy towards Poland come from the MFA archives from 1972-1980. The time period covered in this study matches the schedule of the Chancellor’s visits. The activity of the Polish diplomacy in the Communist period (1945-1989) has been addressed as a research topic in several publications on Polish history. How- ever, as Andrzej Paczkowski says in the sixth volume of Historia dyplomacji polskiej (A history of Polish diplomacy), research on this topic is still in its infancy.3 A wide range of source materials that need to be thoroughly reviewed offer a number of 1 Stosunki dyplomatyczne Polski, Informator, vol. -
June 1-15, 1972
RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/2/1972 A Appendix “B” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/5/1972 A Appendix “A” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/6/1972 A Appendix “A” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/9/1972 A Appendix “A” 5 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 6/12/1972 A Appendix “B” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-10 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary June 1, 1972 – June 15, 1972 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) THF WHITE ,'OUSE PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON'S DAILY DIARY (Sec Travel Record for Travel AnivilY) f PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day. Yr.) _u.p.-1:N_E I, 1972 WILANOW PALACE TIME DAY WARSAW, POLi\ND 7;28 a.m. THURSDAY PHONE TIME P=Pl.ccd R=Received ACTIVITY 1----.,------ ----,----j In Out 1.0 to 7:28 P The President requested that his Personal Physician, Dr. -
Analyse Der Parlamentswahlen in Polen 2007 Zahlen Und Daten Stephan Raabe Leiter Des Auslandsbüros Polen Der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Warschau, 24
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung in Polen ul. J. Dabrowskiego 56, P-02-561 Warszawa Tel.: 0048-22-845 38 94, [email protected] ; www.kas.de/warschau ; www.kas.pl Analyse der Parlamentswahlen in Polen 2007 Zahlen und Daten Stephan Raabe Leiter des Auslandsbüros Polen der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Warschau, 24. Oktober 2007 Amtliches Endergebnis : 1. Bürgerplattform / Platforma Obywatelska (PO) 41,51 %, 209 Sitze (2005: 24,14 %, 133 Sitze); 2. Recht und Gerechtigkeit / Prawo i Sprawiedliwo ść (PiS) 32,11 %, 166 Sitze (2005: 26,99 %, 155 Sitze); 3. Lewica i Demokraci (LiD) 13,15 %, 53 Sitze (Zusammenschluss von: Bündnis der Demokratischen Linken / Sojusz Lewicy De- mokratycznej ( SLD ) 2005: 11,31 %, 55 Sitze; Sozialdemokraten / Socjaldemokracja Polska ( SDPL ) 2005: 3,89 %, 0 Sitze; Demokratischer Partei / Partia Demokratyczna - Demokraci.pl ( PD ) (ehemals Freiheitsunion: Unia Wolno ści) 2005: 2,45 %, 0 Sitze); 4. Polnische Volkspartei / Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (PSL) 8,91, 31 Sitze (2005: 6,96 %, 25 Sitze); 5. Deutsche Minderheit /Mniejszo ść Niemiecka (MN) 1 Sitz (2005: 0,48 %, 2 Sitze); 6. Selbstverteidigung der Republik Polens / Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej ( Sam ) 1,53 Prozent, 0 Sitze (2005: 11,41 %, 56 Sitze); 7. Liga der polnischen Familien / Liga Polskich Rodzin ( LPR ) 1,3 %, 0 Sitze (2005: 7,97 %, 34 Sitze); Sitzverteilung im Parlament 460 Sitze PO 209 PSL 31 PiS 166 LiD 53 Dt. Mind. 1 2 Offizielles Endergebnis der Wahlen in Polen 50 40 30 20 10 0 PO PiS LiD PSL Sam LPR 41,51 32,11 13,15 8,91 1,53 1,30 Wahlen 2007 Wahlen 2005 Wahlbeteiligung so hoch wie nie seit 1989 Die Wahlbeteiligung war so hoch wie noch nie bei freien demokratischen Parlamentswahlen seit 1989. -
Soviet Union
Eastern Europe Soviet Union A HE SOVIET authorities continued to maintain strict control, censorship, and rigid application of the party line to all areas of Soviet life. The system was obviously oppressive; repression without a legal framework was still the law; camps continued to exist, as did mental clinics for dissidents, but swift and secret execution of the opposition as practiced under Stalin, now was a thing of the past. According to available sources, there existed in the Soviet Union some 900 camps and special institutions, including prisons, in which about one million persons were being held. Among them were an estimated 10,000 political prisoners (according to PeterReddaway, New York Times. January 13, 1974). After more than half a century, the revolutionary regime had in fact reverted to the system of czarist Russia.Aside from internal repression, the Kremlin has introduced exile abroad as an effective measure against dissidence. Vladimir Maksimov, Andrei Siniavskii, Andrei Volkonskii, and Michael Kalik joined many others who had been exiled earlier (see AJYB, 1972 and 1973) [Vol. 73 and 74], Dissidence While the forced departure of many of the leading personalities of the dissident movement weakened its activities, the Soviet authorities have not been able to liquidate the opposition, particularly among the intelligentsia, the youth, and certain religious circles. Visibly increased pressure by the police, however, has created some confusion among the opposition and forced recantations of "unjust attitudes toward our 491 492 / AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK. 1974-75 social and state systems" by the well-known dissidents Piotr Iakir and Viktor Krasin. These two men, who were jailed for their activities, received relatively mild sentences. -
Pamięć I Sprawiedliwość Pismo Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej
PAMIĘĆ I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ PISMO INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ ISSN 1427-7476 2 (24) 2014 PAMIĘĆ I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ PISMO NAUKOWE POŚWIĘCONE HISTORII NAJNOWSZEJ PAMIĘĆ I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ PISMO NAUKOWE POŚWIĘCONE HISTORII NAJNOWSZEJ 2 (24) 2014 Warszawa RADA PROGRAMOWA: dr Petr Blažek, dr Jochen Böhler, dr José M. Faraldo, prof. Idesbald Goddeeris, prof. dr hab. Ryszard Kaczmarek, dr Łukasz Kamiński, prof. Padraic Kenney, dr hab. Marek Kornat, prof. dr hab. Paweł Machcewicz, dr Andrij Portnow, prof. dr hab. Rafał Stobiecki, prof. dr hab. Dariusz Stola REDAKCJA: dr Władysław Bułhak, dr Natalia Jarska (II sekretarz redakcji), dr Małgorzata Choma-Jusińska (sekretarz redakcji), dr Patryk Pleskot, dr Sławomir Poleszak (redaktor naczelny), dr Grzegorz Waligóra, dr hab. Marek Wierzbicki, dr hab. Rafał Wnuk Spis recenzentów współpracujących z czasopismem „Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość” przy tomach wydanych w 2014 r.: dr hab. Tomasz Balbus, dr hab. Grzegorz Berendt, dr Karolina Bittner, dr hab. Daniel Boćkowski, dr hab. Robert Borkowski, dr Błażej Brzostek, dr Jan Bury, dr hab. Adam Dziurok, prof. Tadeusz Dubicki, prof. Jerzy Eisler, dr hab. Ry- szard Gryz, prof. Andrzej Friszke, dr Łukasz Garbal, dr Piotr Gontarczyk, dr Andrzej Grajewski, dr hab. Igor Hałagida, dr hab. Grzegorz Hryciuk, dr hab. Wanda Jarząbek, dr Sławomir Kalbarczyk, dr Bartosz Kaliski, dr Daniel Koreś, Paweł Knap, dr Marcin Kruszyński, dr hab. Dariusz Libionka, dr Sebastian Ligarski, dr Piotr M. Majewski, dr hab. Mariusz Mazur, dr Anna Mazurkiewicz, dr hab. Grzegorz Motyka, dr hab. Filip Musiał, dr hab. Piotr Niwiński, dr hab. Sławomir M. Nowinowski, prof. Andrzej Paczkowski, dr Mariusz Patelski, prof. Maria Pasztor, dr hab. Joanna Sadowska, dr Paweł Sasanka, dr Paweł Skubisz, dr hab. -
Uni International 300 N ZEEB ROAD
INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The follomng explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. -
POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Scho
MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD: POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. By Siobhan K. Doucette, M.A. Washington, DC April 11, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Siobhan K. Doucette All Rights Reserved ii MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD: POLISH INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING, 1976-1989 Siobhan K. Doucette, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrzej S. Kamiński, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the rapid growth of Polish independent publishing between 1976 and 1989, examining the ways in which publications were produced as well as their content. Widespread, long-lasting independent publishing efforts were first produced by individuals connected to the democratic opposition; particularly those associated with KOR and ROPCiO. Independent publishing expanded dramatically during the Solidarity-era when most publications were linked to Solidarity, Rural Solidarity or NZS. By the mid-1980s, independent publishing obtained new levels of pluralism and diversity as publications were produced through a bevy of independent social milieus across every segment of society. Between 1976 and 1989, thousands of independent titles were produced in Poland. Rather than employing samizdat printing techniques, independent publishers relied on printing machines which allowed for independent publication print-runs in the thousands and even tens of thousands, placing Polish independent publishing on an incomparably greater scale than in any other country in the Communist bloc. By breaking through social atomization and linking up individuals and milieus across class, geographic and political divides, independent publications became the backbone of the opposition; distribution networks provided the organizational structure for the Polish underground. -
FINAŁ Imię I Nazwisko Ucznia
KONKURS WIEDZY HISTORYCZNEJ VIII EDYCJA FINAŁ Imię i nazwisko ucznia Adres e-mail Nazwa i adres szkoły Punktowane są tylko poprawne odpowiedzi. Odpowiedzi wielokrotnie poprawiane nie będą brane pod uwagę. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D B C D A C C C A C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A B C A A B A A B B 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 D A B C B B A B C A 1. Instytucja prawna w średniowieczu, polegająca na zwolnieniu dóbr ze świadczeń na rzecz władcy państwa (seniora) i przyznaniu lennikom prawa sądzenia na określonym terytorium to: a. Seniorat b. Komendacja c. Inwestytura d. Immunitet 2. Św. Tomasz z Akwinu, filozof, jeden z najwybitniejszych myślicieli w dziejach chrześcijaństwa, był: a. Franciszkaninem, profesorem w Paryżu b. Dominikaninem, profesorem w Paryżu c. Benedyktynem w Rzymie d. Profesorem w Bolonii 3. Dynastia Arpadów panowała: a. w Czechach b. w Polsce c. na Węgrzech d. na Krymie 4. Poradlne to: a. Dziesięcina na rzecz władcy b. Nowy sposób uprawiania ziemi polegający na stosowaniu radła z odkładnicą c. Karczunek łanów ziemi pod uprawę d. Podatek bezpośredni płacony od łana 5. W wyniku drugiego pokoju toruńskiego w 1466 r. do Polski zostały przyłączone: a. Prusy Królewskie b. Prusy Książęce c. Prusy Górne d. Pomorze Zachodnie 6. Ziemie Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego włączone do Korony Polskiej w 1569 r. w wyniku unii lubelskiej to: a. Wołyń, Podole, Inflanty, Mołdawia b. Podole, Kijowszczyzna, Ziemia Smoleńska c. Podlasie, Wołyń, Podole, Kijowszczyzna d. -
SR April 2015
THE SARMATIAN REVIEW Vol. XXXV, No. 2 __ _____________ _________ __ April 2015 Zbigniew Romaszewski: RIP Zbigniew Romaszewski (1940–2014) at home in Warsaw. Courtesy of Trzecia Strona Publishers (www.trzeciastrona.pl). April 2015 THE SARMATIAN REVIEW 2014): A Life in Human Rights . 1911 The Sarmatian Review (ISSN 1059- Dariusz Skórczewski, Between clichés and erasure: 5872) is a triannual publication of the Polish Institute of Eastern and Central non-Germanic Europe as an Houston. The journal deals with Polish, Central, and Eastern European affairs, and it explores their implications empty syntagm in contemporary public for the United States. We specialize in the translation of discourse. .1919 documents. Sarmatian Review is indexed in the American MORE BOOKS : Piotr Skwieciński’s Romaszewscy Bibliography of Slavic and East European Studies, EBSCO, and Maja Trochimczyk’s Slicing the Bread . 1931 and P.A.I.S. International Database. From January 1998 on, Joseph A. Kotarba, The Long Way Home: An files in PDF format are available at the Central and Eastern American Journey from Ellis Island to the Great War European Online Library (www.ceeol.com). Subscription (review). 1932 price is $21.00 per year for individuals, $28.00 for John Guzlowski, In Paradise (review) . 1933 institutions and libraries ($28.00 for individuals, $35.00 for Letter to the Editor . 1934 libraries overseas, air mail). The views expressed by authors of articles do not necessarily represent those of the THANK YOU NOTE . 1934 Editors or of the Polish Institute of Houston. Articles are subject to editing. Unsolicited manuscripts and other materials are not returned unless accompanied by a self- addressed and stamped envelope. -
Economic History – Introduction and Lectures. Part 1
Łukasz Dwilewicz Economic History – Introduction and Lectures. Part 1. Introduction to Economic History!..................................................3 1. Economic history – boundaries and development of the field!.....................3 2. Economic history in Poland!......................................................................38 3. Selected general problems of economic history!.........................................42 References:!....................................................................................................61 Part 2. Lectures and their Structure!.........................................................66 Lecture 1!.......................................................................................................66 Lecture 2!.......................................................................................................72 Lecture 3!......................................................................................................79 Lecture 4!......................................................................................................86 Lecture 5!.......................................................................................................93 Lecture 6!....................................................................................................106 Lecture 7!....................................................................................................112 Lecture 8!....................................................................................................115 -
Institute of National Remembrance
Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/231,Curator-of-National-Remembrance-Prize-June-19-2007-Warsaw.html 2021-10-01, 08:22 13.06.2007 Curator of National Remembrance Prize, June 19, 2007, Warsaw In July 2002 the President of the Institute of National Remembrance established Curator of National Remembrance Prize. This honorary title is awarded to a person, institution or public organization for outstanding deeds commemorating Polish Nation’s history between 1939-1989 as well as public activity converging with statutory aims of the Institute. The prize is granted annually by the Chapter presided over by the President of IPN. The capitularies are i.a. laureates of the prize. The idea of National Remembrance Prize is to restore respect for the nation’s history and to preserve values, which let Poland survive the years of enslavement. The laureates in 2002: Colonel Professor Elżbieta Zawadzka, Professor Tomasz Strzębosz Andrzej Zagórski In 2003: Professor Janusz Kazimierz Zawodny Commission of History of Women in the Struggle for Independence Polish Underground Movement (1939-1945) Study Trust In 2004: Professor Władysław Bartoszewski Editorial staff of Association of “Freedom and Independence” in Documents Zofia Leszczyńska In 2005: Professor Barbara Otwinowska General Bolesław Nieczuja-Ostrowski Lieutenant colonel Stanisław Dąbrowa-Kostka Father Józef Mońko Association “Solidarity Archive” In 2006: The Order of Pauline Fathers Czesława and Euheniusz Cydzik Andrzej Kunert, PhD Zofia and Zbigniew Romaszewski The 2007 ceremony of Curator of National Remembrance Prize, under honorary patronage of Lech Kaczyński, President of Poland, took place on June 19th 2007, at Royal Castle in Warsaw. -
Wotum Nieufności W PRL? Odpowiedzialność Parlamentarna Rady Ministrów W Okresie Obowiązywania Konstytucji Z 22 Lipca 1952 R
STUDIA Z D ZIEJÓ W PAŃSTWA I PRAWA POLSKIEGO XX — 2017 STUDIES II HISTORY OF POLISH STATE AND LAW e-ISSN 2450-6095; ISSN 1733-0335 M a c i e j R a k o w s k i (Ł ó d ź ) Wotum nieufności w PRL? Odpowiedzialność parlamentarna Rady Ministrów w okresie obowiązywania konstytucji z 22 lipca 1952 r. Przez wiele lat władza przedstawiała się jako monolit, co najwyżej ujawniano, i to dopiero po jakimś czasie, konflikty personalne. Był to obraz nieprawdziwy1. 1. Wprowadzenie; 2. Konstytucyjna regulacja zmian w składzie Rady Ministrów PRL; 3. Zmiana na stanowisku prezesa Rady Ministrów PRL; 4. Odwołanie rządu po wyborach do Sejmu; 5. Forma prawna decyzji o zmianie rządu PRL; 6. Uwagi końcowe. 1 Wotum nieufności to instytucja kluczowa dla systemu parlamentarno-gabi netowego. Ten model ustrojowy występuje wówczas, gdy rząd ponosi odpowie dzialność polityczną przed parlamentem, a nie ponosi jej (co do zasady) przed głową państwa. Wotum nieufności przybiera różne formy - może dotyczyć całego ministerium lub tylko poszczególnych członków; może być równoznaczne z od wołaniem rządu albo wyrażać tylko żądanie jego dymisji (jak w Wielkiej Brytanii); może przybierać postać wyraźnej uchwały izby albo stanowić tzw. wotum dorozu miane; może też funkcjonować tzw. konstruktywne wotum nieufności. Zdarzało się, że interesująca nas instytucja ustrojowa opierała się na zwyczajach konstytu cyjnych, a nie na treści przepisów ustawy zasadniczej2. Czy w systemie ustrojowym PRL odnajdziemy przejawy takiego parlamentar nego wotum nieufności? W konstytucji z 1952 r. izba ustawodawcza została opi 1 Z. Messner, 19 września 1988 r. (fragment przemówienia, w którym podał swój rząd do dymisji), Sejm Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej Kadencja IX - Sesja VII, Sprawozdanie Ste nograficzne z 37posiedzenia Sejmu Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej w dniu 19 września 1988 r., W arszawa 1988, s.