DOCSLIB.ORG

Postpartum Consequences of an Overlap of Breastfeeding and Pregnancy: Reduced Breast Milk Intake and Growth During Early Infancy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Postpartum Consequences of an Overlap of Breastfeeding and Pregnancy: Reduced Breast Milk Intake and Growth During Early Infancy Postpartum Consequences of an Overlap of Breastfeeding and Pregnancy: Reduced Breast Milk Intake and Growth During Early Infancy Grace S. Marquis, PhD*; Mary E. Penny, MBChB, MRCP‡; Judith M. Diaz, BS‡; and R. Margot Marı´n, BS‡ ABSTRACT. Objective. Despite cultural pressure to cultural taboos against continuing to breastfeed.1,2 wean when a new pregnancy occurs, some women choose The practice of continuing to breastfeed during preg- to continue breastfeeding. We determined the effect of an nancy has been reported among US women but overlap of lactation and late pregnancy on breastfeeding might not be discussed with health professionals and growth in early infancy. because of anticipated criticism of the practice.3–5 Methods. We studied 133 Peruvian pregnant women Breastfeeding during pregnancy is more common in who were >18 years of age, had a child <4 years old, and who then had a vaginal birth with a healthy, normal some low-income countries than in the United States weight infant. Of the 133 women, 68 breastfed during the because shorter birth intervals increase the likeli- last trimester of pregnancy (BFP), and 65 had not breast- hood of a pregnancy-lactation overlap. fed during pregnancy (NBFP). On day 2 and at 1-month It has been suggested that an overlap could pro- postpartum, 24-hour intake of breast milk and other liq- duce suboptimal outcomes for both pregnancy and uids was measured. Twice weekly home surveillance subsequent lactation.6–8 Dairy research has demon- documented infant morbidity and dietary intakes. An- strated that a complete overlap of lactation during thropometry was taken at birth and at 1 month. Maternal pregnancy dramatically compromises the total pro- anthropometric, health, and socioeconomic status data duction of mature milk during the next lactation were collected pre- and postpartum. period.9–14 A dry (nonmilking) period of approxi- Results. Pregnant BFP mothers breastfed 5.3 ؎ 4.3 times/day. BFP and NBFP infants did not differ in breast- mately 2 months before calving is usual in the dairy feeding behavior or in colostrum intake on day 2. BFP industry. This is the first human study to provide infants breastfed longer per feed and per 24 hours (35.2 data on the association between the practice of lac- minutes/24 hours) than did NBFP infants; however, tating through late pregnancy and breastfeeding and 1-month intakes per feed tended to be lower among the growth outcomes of young infants. BFP infants. After controlling for confounders, BFP in- fants gained 125 g less than did NBFP infants (about 15% of mean weight gain). A sustained decline would result METHODS in a ؊0.7 z score change in weight-for-age by 6 months. Participants Conclusions. A lactation-pregnancy overlap had a The study was conducted in a poor periurban community of negative effect on early infant outcomes. Additional approximately 800 000 on the outskirts of Lima, Peru. The inclu- studies are needed to determine whether the effect con- sion criteria for mothers were: 1) pregnant; 2) Ն18 years of age; 3) tinues past 1 month of age. Pediatrics 2002;109(4). URL: multiparous and living with her child Ͻ4 years old; 4) without http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/109/4/e56; apparent indicators for elective cesarean section; and 5) either breastfeeding, pregnancy, overlap, breast milk volume, continuing to breastfeed into the third trimester or never breastfed weight gain, infant feeding, Peru. during this pregnancy. Routes to identify possible participants were community census, local prenatal health service registers, and referrals. Between July 1998 and January 2000, 3417 pregnant ABBREVIATIONS. BFP, breastfed during pregnancy; NBFP, did women were identified. Of these, 601 women were not located at not breastfeed during pregnancy; BMI, body mass index; SES, home, and 27 women declined to participate in a screening inter- socioeconomic status; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. view. Field workers screened 2789 pregnant women, and 727 met all of the inclusion criteria: 170 women breastfed their older chil- dren during the third trimester of pregnancy (BFP) and 557 any women throughout the world breast- women had not breastfed at all during the present pregnancy (NBFP). Breastfeeding was confirmed by direct observation; date feed for as long as possible to give their of weaning was obtained from those mothers who had weaned Mchildren the nutritional, immunologic, and during the third trimester and before enrollment. emotional benefits of breastfeeding. When lactation Postpartum follow-up was confined to women who gave birth overlaps a new pregnancy, some women choose not to an infant who was a vaginal delivery, full-term (Ͼ37 weeks’ gestational age), healthy birth weight (Ͼ2500 g), and with no birth to wean their toddlers, although there may be strong defects or complications that would hinder breastfeeding. Of the 170 enrolled BFP women, 70 mother-infant pairs were followed after birth. Reasons for no postpartum follow-up included refusal From the *Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State (N ϭ 40), moved or worked (N ϭ 12), mother not available within University, Ames, Iowa; and ‡Instituto de Investigacio´n Nutricional, Lima, 48 hours of birth (N ϭ 13), birth problems (N ϭ 19), and other (eg, Peru. twins, older child with problems; N ϭ 16). Received for publication Jun 11, 2000; accepted Nov 28, 2000. Of the 557 NBFP women enrolled during pregnancy, 67 were Address correspondence to Grace S. Marquis, PhD, 1127 Human Nutri- followed up. Probable data of delivery was recorded for all NBFP tional Sciences Building, Department of Food Science and Human Nutri- mothers. For each BFP infant born, a NBFP woman was selected at tion, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011. E-mail: [email protected] random from the pool of women scheduled to give birth that PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2002 by the American Acad- month. The first selected NBFP woman who met the postpartum emy of Pediatrics. criteria was included. The reasons for no follow-up were refusal http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/109/4/Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/newse56 by guestPEDIATRICS on September Vol. 29, 2021 109 No. 4 April 2002 1of8 (N ϭ 174), moved or worked (N ϭ 40), not randomly selected (N ϭ Morbidity N ϭ 71), not available within 48 hours of birth ( 99), birth problems Maternal reports of daily symptoms of infants and any treat- N ϭ N ϭ ( 54), and other ( 52). Of the 137 infants who were studied ment were recorded twice weekly for the first month. Stool char- on day 2 postpartum, 133 infants had a repeated study at 1 month acter and frequency as well as general and respiratory symptoms of age. Two BFP and 2 NBFP infants had no repeat study because were recorded along with maternal illness and treatment. A diar- N ϭ N ϭ of refusal ( 2) and moving ( 2). This analysis is based on rheal day was a day with 3 or more liquid/semiliquid stools in 24 the 133 infants with observations for both days. hours. A dichotomous variable of ever having diarrhea was de- veloped. Prevalence of diarrhea and cough in the infant and any Comparison of Included and Excluded Families maternal illness was calculated. Other symptoms were infrequent The included BFP families had some indicators of a better (Ͻ6% of days observed) and, therefore, not considered here. economic status (eg, housing quality) than the excluded BFP fam- ilies. The included NBFP mothers were significantly more likely to be younger, born in the mountains, and live with fewer adults as Socioeconomic Data compared with excluded NBFP families. Other family demo- Socioeconomic data on the quality of housing, hygiene, posses- graphic, socioeconomic, and obstetric data that were collected sions owned, and education and employment of family members during pregnancy did not differ. were collected at the screening interview and day 2 postpartum. Data Collection Data Analysis Obstetric History and Birth Mean group differences for continuous variables were tested At screening, all pregnant women were interviewed about their with the Student t test and analysis of variance; Kruskal-Wallis obstetric history and previous breastfeeding experience. Morbid- 1-way analysis of variance was used for variables with nonnormal ity data were gathered twice monthly for all enrolled women. distribution. Frequency differences were tested with the ␹2 good- Relevant delivery and birth information was collected from clini- ness-of-fit test. Multiple linear regression models were used to cal records when available and from mothers. For deliveries at estimate the effect of breastfeeding late in pregnancy on day 2 and health facilities, dystocia (abnormal duration of labor) was defined 1-month breast milk intake and 1-month growth. Logistic regres- by practitioners, using the World Health Organization’s parto- sion was used to estimate the effect of an overlap on the risk of graph to monitor cervical dilatation and fetal descent.15 All home very low (Ͻ25th percentile) milk intake and growth. Both models births were assumed to have involved normal labor. controlled for confounding factors including sex, age, first weight, feeding behaviors (duration and frequency of feeds, breastfed by Breastfeeding Behavior another woman, hours postpartum), and maternal characteristics (age, parity, pregnancy complication, anthropometric measure- Once a month during pregnancy, BFP mothers recorded their ments). With birth weight or length in an equation predicting toddlers’ feeding frequency or the date of weaning. After birth at 1-month weight or length, the other coefficients reflected their twice-weekly home visits, mothers recalled their breastfeeding effects on the corresponding increment from birth. Morbidity (eg, practices of the previous days, including whether the infant was prevalence of diarrhea and cough) and socioeconomic status (SES) breastfed by another woman and whether the mother breastfed variables were not significant predictors of the milk and growth another child.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Common Breastfeeding Questions
    Common Breastfeeding Questions How often should my baby nurse? Your baby should nurse 8-12 times in 24 hours. Baby will tell you when he’s hungry by “rooting,” sucking on his hands or tongue, or starting to wake. Just respond to baby’s cues and latch baby on right away. Every mom and baby’s feeding patterns will be unique. Some babies routinely breastfeed every 2-3 hours around the clock, while others nurse more frequently while awake and sleep longer stretches in between feedings. The usual length of a breastfeeding session can be 10-15 minutes on each breast or 15-30 minutes on only one breast; just as long as the pattern is consistent. Is baby getting enough breastmilk? Look for these signs to be sure that your baby is getting enough breastmilk: Breastfeed 8-12 times each day, baby is sucking and swallowing while breastfeeding, baby has 3- 4 dirty diapers and 6-8 wet diapers each day, the baby is gaining 4-8 ounces a week after the first 2 weeks, baby seems content after feedings. If you still feel that your baby may not be getting enough milk, talk to your health care provider. How long should I breastfeed? The World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends mothers to breastfeed for 12 months or longer. Breastmilk contains everything that a baby needs to develop for the first 6 months. Breastfeeding for at least the first 6 months is termed, “The Golden Standard.” Mothers can begin breastfeeding one hour after giving birth.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Hale's Lactation Risk Categories
    Just like during pregnancy, it is extremely important to talk to your doctor, pharmacist or lactation consultant before taking any medications. Most medications are safe, but there are many that can pass through your breastmilk to baby. Your lactation consultant also has access to resources about medication safety and breastfeeding. Medication Category Dr. Hale’s Lactation Risk Categories Acetaminophen (Tylenol) L1 L1 Safest Amoxicillin L1 Drug which has been taken by a large number of breastfeeding moth- ers without any observed increase in adverse effects in the infant. Aspirin L3 Controlled studies in breastfeeding women fail to demonstrate a risk to the infant and the possibility of harm to the breastfeeding infant is Birth Control – ONLY Acceptable remote; or the product is not orally bioavailable in an infant. L2 Safer Norethindrone, Depo-Provera, Drug which has been studied in a limited number of breastfeeding Implanon, Mirena, Plan B women without an increase in adverse effects in the infant; And/or, the evidence of a demonstrated risk which is likely to follow use of this medication in a breastfeeding woman is remote. Cetrizine (Zyrtec) L2 L3 Moderately Safe There are no controlled studies in breastfeeding women, however Dextromethorphan (Robitussin L1 the risk of untoward effects to a breastfed infant is possible; or, con- etc.) trolled studies show only minimal non-threatening adverse effects. Drugs should be given only if the potential benefit justifies the poten- Dimenhydrinate (Dramamine) L2 tial risk to the infant. L4 Possibly Hazardous Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) L2 There is positive evidence of risk to a breastfed infant or to breast- milk production, but the benefits of use in breastfeeding mothers Fluoxetine (Prozac) L2 may be acceptable despite the risk to the infant (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Melasma (1 of 8)
    Melasma (1 of 8) 1 Patient presents w/ symmetric hyperpigmented macules, which can be confl uent or punctate suggestive of melasma 2 DIAGNOSIS No ALTERNATIVE Does clinical presentation DIAGNOSIS confirm melasma? Yes A Non-pharmacological therapy • Patient education • Camoufl age make-up • Sunscreen B Pharmacological therapy Monotherapy • Hydroquinone or • Tretinoin TREATMENT Responding to No treatment? See next page Yes Continue treatment © MIMSas required Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. B94 © MIMS 2019 Melasma (2 of 8) Patient unresponsive to initial therapy MELASMA A Non-pharmacological therapy • Patient education • Camoufl age make-up • Sunscreen B Pharmacological therapy Dual Combination erapy • Hydroquinone plus • Tretinoin or • Azelaic acid Responding to Yes Continue treatment treatment? as required No A Non-pharmacological therapy • Patient education • Camoufl age make-up • Sunscreen • Laser therapy • Dermabrasion B Pharmacological therapy Triple Combination erapy • Hydroquinone plus • Tretinoin plus • Topical steroid Chemical peels 1 MELASMA • Acquired hyperpigmentary skin disorder characterized by irregular light to dark brown macules occurring in the sun-exposed areas of the face, neck & arms - Occurs most commonly w/ pregnancy (chloasma) & w/ the use of contraceptive pills - Other factors implicated in the etiopathogenesis are photosensitizing medications, genetic factors, mild ovarian or thyroid dysfunction, & certain cosmetics • Most commonly aff ects Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III & IV • More common in women than in men • Rare before puberty & common in women during their reproductive years • Solar & ©ultraviolet exposure is the mostMIMS important factor in its development Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding Contraindications
    WIC Policy & Procedures Manual POLICY: NED: 06.00.00 Page 1 of 1 Subject: Breastfeeding Contraindications Effective Date: October 1, 2019 Revised from: October 1, 2015 Policy: There are very few medical reasons when a mother should not breastfeed. Identify contraindications that may exist for the participant. Breastfeeding is contraindicated when: • The infant is diagnosed with classic galactosemia, a rare genetic metabolic disorder. • Mother has tested positive for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome) or has Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). • The mother has tested positive for human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus type I or type II (HTLV-1/2). • The mother is using illicit street drugs, such as PCP (phencyclidine) or cocaine (exception: narcotic-dependent mothers who are enrolled in a supervised methadone program and have a negative screening for HIV and other illicit drugs can breastfeed). • The mother has suspected or confirmed Ebola virus disease. Breastfeeding may be temporarily contraindicated when: • The mother is infected with untreated brucellosis. • The mother has an active herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection with lesions on the breast. • The mother is undergoing diagnostic imaging with radiopharmaceuticals. • The mother is taking certain medications or illicit drugs. Note: mothers should be provided breastfeeding support and a breast pump, when appropriate, and may resume breastfeeding after consulting with their health care provider to determine when and if their breast milk is safe for their infant and should be provided with lactation support to establish and maintain milk supply. Direct breastfeeding may be temporarily contraindicated and the mother should be temporarily isolated from her infant(s) but expressed breast milk can be fed to the infant(s) when: • The mother has untreated, active Tuberculosis (TB) (may resume breastfeeding once she has been treated approximately for two weeks and is documented to be no longer contagious).
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Care, Hair Care and Cosmetic Treatments in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding
    Skin Care, Hair Care and Cosmetic Treatments in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Information in this leaflet is general in nature and should not take the place of advice from your health care provider. With every pregnancy there is a 3 to 5% risk of having a baby with a birth defect. Issues for pregnancy Many pregnant women have skin and hair concerns just as they did before pregnancy. Sometimes conditions such as acne actually worsen during pregnancy because of hormonal changes and often women notice darkening of their skin (melasma). However, due to concern about potentially hazardous exposures to their unborn babies, pregnant women are often uncertain about which products are safe for them to use. Generally cosmetic treatments are discretionary (not medically necessary) and if safety is uncertain, women should consider whether the product or treatment is really required. There are several considerations when evaluating whether a specific skin or hair product is unsafe in pregnancy. Firstly, the active ingredient in the product needs to be considered unsafe. Secondly, it also has to be able to reach the unborn baby in its mother’s womb by inhalation or absorption through the mother’s skin (topical application). Although there is often limited information about the actual safety of specific ingredients in skin products during pregnancy, if it is known that skin absorption is minimal then the exposure to the unborn baby is generally insignificant and the product or treatment is regarded as safe. Below is a summary of current advice. Cosmetics, Moisturisers and other Skin Care Products Cosmetics and over the counter skin products generally contain ingredients that are unlikely to be harmful in pregnancy as they are used by applying to the skin (rather than swallowing a tablet).
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding Matters
    Breastfeeding Matters An important guide for breastfeeding families ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Best Start by Health Nexus would like to thank the Public Health Units of Ontario who supported the creation and development of this provincial resource and generously shared their resources and expertise. We would also like to thank the parents and the experts who provided input for this booklet. Final review was done by Marg La Salle, RN, BScN, IBCLC, and BFI Lead Assessor. The information in this booklet is current at the time of production but information can change over time. Every effort will be made to ensure the information remains current. Throughout this resource, gender-specific language such as “woman”, “women” and “mother” is used in order to accurately cite the research referred to. We intend these terms to refer to all childbearing individuals, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation. Funded by the Government of Ontario. Table of Contents SECTION 1 .......................... 3 SECTION 4 ........................ 27 The Importance of Breastfeeding Important Things to Know • Risks of Not Breastfeeding • Waking a Sleepy Baby • Your Breastfeeding Rights • Calming a Fussy Baby • The Baby-Friendly Initiative • Burping Your Baby • Making an Informed Decision • Growth Spurts • Family Support • Sore Nipples • Peer Support • Using a Pacifier (Soother) • Engorgement SECTION 2 ........................ 11 • Storing Your Breast Milk Helping Your Baby Get a Good Start • Skin-to-Skin SECTION 5 ........................ 33 • Safe Positioning
    [Show full text]
  • In a New Video, the Mom of Two Reveals the Dark Spot Toner She Swears By
    In a new video, the mom of two reveals the dark spot toner she swears by. Hilary Duff, who is mom to Luca, 7, and Banks, 1, recently shared her “busy mom makeup routine” with Vogue — including the product she uses to treat her pregnancy melasma. “I’m a busy mom,” the actress says in the video. “I don’t have a ton of time to do my makeup, but this version today is on a day when I have my kids but also have a couple of meetings and I want to look like I put some effort in.” Duff starts off her routine by washing her hands or using hand sanitizer. She then reaches for her toner. “One really ‘cool’ thing that happened to me when I had babies is I got melasma,” she shared, pointing to a dark spot near the top of her forehead. “Every day, I say a little prayer that it’s taking care of that dark spot right there,” she says, rubbing on Ole Henriksen’s Glow2OH Dark Spot Toner ($29; sephora.com). Other products in Duff's kit include REN Clean Skincare Keep Young and Beautiful Anti-Aging Eye Cream ($44; sephora.com) and Perricone MD No Makeup Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 20 ($60; ulta.com). What is melasma, exactly? Melasma is a common skin condition that causes brown to gray-brown patches to develop, usually on the face. Also referred to as the mask of pregnancy, melasma appears when a sharp rise in estrogen and progesterone levels stimulates excess melanin production, also known as hyperpigmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding Support Credentials
    Who’s Who? A glance at breastfeeding support in the United States Lactation support is often needed to help mothers initiate and continue breastfeeding. There are many kinds of help available for breastfeeding mothers including peer counselors, certified breastfeeding educators and counselors, and lactation professionals such as the International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC®). Breastfeeding support is valuable for a variety of reasons, from encouragement and emotional support to guidance and assistance with complex clinical situations. Mothers benefit from all kinds of support, and it is important to receive the right kind at the right time. The breastfeeding support categories listed below each play a vital role in providing care to mothers and babies. Breastfeeding Support Prerequisites Training Required Scope of Practice Type • 90 hours of lactation-specific education Recognized health Provide professional, • College level health science professional or evidence based, clinical courses Professional satisfactory completion lactation management; • 300-1000 clinical practice hours (International Board Certified of collegiate level educate families, health Lactation Consultant, IBCLC®) • Successful completion of a health sciences professionals and others criterion-referenced exam offered coursework. about human lactation. by an independent international board of examiners. Certified • 20-120 hours of classroom training Provide education and • Often includes a written exam guidance for families (i.e. Certified Lactation N/A Counselor, Certified or “certification” offered by the on basic breastfeeding Breastfeeding Educator, etc. ) training organization issues. Provide breastfeeding information, Peer Personal breastfeeding • 18-50 hours of classroom training encouragement, and (i.e. La Leche League, WIC experience. Peer Counselor, etc.) support to those in their community. Copyright © 2016 by USLCA.
    [Show full text]
  • MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH Technical Information Bulletin
    A Review of the Medical Benefits and Contraindications to Breastfeeding in the United States Ruth A. Lawrence, M.D. Technical Information Bulletin Technical MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH MATERNAL October 1997 Cite as Lawrence RA. 1997. A Review of the Medical Benefits and Contraindications to Breastfeeding in the United States (Maternal and Child Health Technical Information Bulletin). Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health. A Review of the Medical Benefits and Contraindications to Breastfeeding in the United States (Maternal and Child Health Technical Information Bulletin) is not copyrighted with the exception of tables 1–6. Readers are free to duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this publi- cation except for tables 1–6 as noted above. Please contact the publishers listed in the tables’ source lines for permission to reprint. In accordance with accepted publishing standards, the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health (NCEMCH) requests acknowledg- ment, in print, of any information reproduced in another publication. The mission of the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health is to promote and improve the health, education, and well-being of children and families by leading a nation- al effort to collect, develop, and disseminate information and educational materials on maternal and child health, and by collaborating with public agencies, voluntary and professional organi- zations, research and training programs, policy centers, and others to advance knowledge in programs, service delivery, and policy development. Established in 1982 at Georgetown University, NCEMCH is part of the Georgetown Public Policy Institute. NCEMCH is funded primarily by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tips for Sore/Cracked Nipples
    Tips for Sore/Cracked Nipples Nipples can become sore and cracked due to many reasons such as a shallow latch, tongue-tie or other anatomical variations, thrush, a bite, milk blister, etc. Keep in mind that one of the most important factors in healing is to correct the source of the problem. Continue to work on correct latch and positioning, thrush treatment, etc. as you treat the symptoms, and talk to a board certified lactation consultant (IBCLC). During the nursing session • Breastfeed from the uninjured (or less injured) side first. Baby will tend to nurse more gently on the second side offered. • Experiment with different breastfeeding positions to determine which is most comfortable. • If breastfeeding is too painful, it is very important to express milk from the injured side to reduce the risk of mastitis and to maintain supply. Pump on a low setting. Salt water rinse after nursing This special type of salt water, called normal saline, has the same salt concentration as tears and should not be painful to use. To make your own normal saline solution: Mix 1/2 teaspoon of salt in one cup (8 oz) of warm water. Make a fresh supply each day to avoid bacterial contamination. • After breastfeeding, soak nipple(s) in a small bowl of warm saline solution for a minute or so–long enough for the saline to get onto all areas of the nipple. Avoid prolonged soaking (more than 5-10 minutes) that “super” hydrates the skin, as this can promote cracking and delay healing. • Pat dry very gently with a soft paper towel.
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding and Breast Milk – from Biochemistry to Impact
    Breastfeeding and Breast Milk – from Biochemistry to Impact A Multidisciplinary Introduction About the Foundation Published by The Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation is one of the first foundations in the Family Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation world with a prime focus on promoting and supporting breast milk and bre- astfeeding. Based in Zug, Switzerland, it was founded in 2013 with the aim of promoting the scientific and public recognition of breastfeeding and breast milk as – given the current state of science – the best nutrition for newborns and infants. It considers itself as an instigator and promoter of new knowledge. The Book Foundation invests globally in projects and scientific research in breastfeeding and breast milk. It places high value on multidisciplinary collaboration and sup- ports projects with a sustainable impact on the well-being of mother and child. Preview With compliments An Evidence-Based Reference Book: a Key Resource for Decision Makers and Practitioners Available at the end of September 2018 Authors from around the globe, each of all the benefits that breastfed infants a specialist within their field have readily enjoy. Based on sound science but written contributed to provide readers with a in popular science style, ensuring an easy Also available as an e-book comprehensive overview of breastfeeding read, the book provides a comprehensive and human milk to encourage and empower and solid foundation including sources and interested parties to move breastfeeding references. It also features a unique in-depth higher up on the public health agenda. scientific glossary of lactation that provides There are many books available looking definitions for a plethora of important at “how to” breastfeed or focusing on a terms of breastfeeding and human milk single topic within the field, others look at that are science based and reviewed by the biomedical aspects of milk, however acknowledged experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs of Effective Breastfeeding
    BREASTFEEDING PROTOCOL: Signs of Effective Breastfeeding The Breastfeeding Protocols are based on the City of Toronto’s Breastfeeding Protocols for Health Care Providers (2013) and are co-owned by the City of Toronto, Toronto Public Health Division (TPH) and the Toronto East Health Network, Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) Strategy for Ontario. Revised Protocols are being released as they are completed, and they are available available at https://breastfeedingresourcesontario.ca/resource/breastfeeding-protocols-health-care-providers. All revised Protocols, as well as the complete set of 2013 Protocols, are available at www.toronto.ca/ wp-content/uploads/2017/11/9102-tph-breastfeeding-protocols-1-to-21-complete-manual-2013.pdf. For more details on the revision process and terminology, please see the Introduction to Breastfeeding Protocols for Health Care Providers. Funding for this project was received from the Government of Ontario. The views expressed in the publication are the views of the Recipient and do not necessarily reflect those of the Province. Process The process of revising and updating the Protocol followed a clear methodology based on Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health www.nccmt.ca, developed by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) and is described in the full Introduction, linked above. Every effort has been made to ensure the highest level of evidence is reflected. Contributors Project Lead: Sonya Boersma, MScN, RN, IBCLC, BFI Strategy for Ontario. Thanks to the following individuals and organizations for their contributions: Revising Authors: Susan Gallagher, BScN, RN, and Tracy Petrou, BScN, RN, IBCLC, Toronto Public Health. External Reviewers: NAME ROLE AND/OR LOCATION ORGANIZATION QUALIFICATIONS Within Ontario Jennifer Abbass-Dick Assistant Professor Central University of Ontario Institute RN, PhD, IBCLC of Technology Lina Al-Imari MD, CCFP, Hon.
    [Show full text]