A New Species of Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae) from an Anchialine Cave on the French Mediterranean Coast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Species of Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae) from an Anchialine Cave on the French Mediterranean Coast A new species of Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae) from an anchialine cave on the French Mediterranean coast Franck BRÉHIER Alas, F-09800 Balaguères (France) [email protected] Damià JAUME Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), c/ Miquel Marquès 21, E-07190 Esporles (Mallorca) (Spain) [email protected] Bréhier F. & Jaume D. 2009. — A new species of Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae) from an anchialine cave on the French Mediterranean coast. Zoosystema 31 (1) : 17-32. ABSTRACT A new species of the stygobiont melitid amphipod genus Pseudoniphargus Chevreux, 1901 is described from an anchialine cave located on the inner shore of the Salses-Leucate coastal lagoon, on the French Mediterranean coast. Th e new species is distinguished from other members of the genus by the combined display of: 1) gnathopod II not sexually dimorphic, with short carpus; 2) outline of basis of pereopods V-VII sexually dimorphic, with both margins convex and with overhanging posterodistal lobe in male, whereas margins subparallel and posterodistal lobe present but not overhanging in female; 3) uropod I protopod KEY WORDS lacking basofacial robust seta; 4) protopod of uropod III sexually dimorphic, Crustacea, proportionaly more elongated in male; 5) exopod of male uropod III not Amphipoda, Gammaridea, strongly elongated (less than 12 times as long as wide), slightly upcurved and Melitidae, tapering; female exopod similar but shorter (about 8.8 times as long as wide); stygofauna, and 6) telson wider than long, with distal margin shallowly excavated and with France, mixohaline waters, two distal robust setae at each side. Th e relationships of this species are briefl y new species. discussed. ZOOSYSTEMA • 2009 • 31 (1) © Publications Scientifi ques du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. www.zoosystema.com 17 Bréhier F. & Jaume D. RÉSUMÉ Une nouvelle espèce de Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae) d’une grotte anchialine de la côte méditerranéenne française. Un nouvel amphipode stygobionte du genre Pseudoniphargus Chevreux, 1901 (Amphipoda, Melitidae) est décrit d’une cavité anchialine située en bordure de l’étang de Salses-Leucate, sur la côte méditerranéenne française (Leucate, Aude, France). Cette nouvelle espèce se distingue de ses congénères par l’ensemble des caractères suivants : 1) gnathopode II sans dimorphisme sexuel, à carpus court ; 2) basis des péreopodes V à VII à dimorphisme sexuel, avec les marges convexes et le lobe postero-distal bien marqué chez le mâle, alors que les marges sont subparallèles et le lobe postero-distal présent mais peu marqué chez la femelle ; 3) absence de soie robuste basofaciale sur le protopode de l’uropode I ; MOTS CLÉS 4) protopode de l’uropode III à dimorphisme sexuel, proportionnellement plus Crustacea, allongé chez le mâle ; 5) exopode de l’uropode III du mâle ne présentant pas Amphipoda, Gammaridea, de forte élongation (moins de 12 fois plus long que large), légèrement incurvé Melitidae, et effi lé ; exopode de la femelle similaire mais plus court (8,8 fois plus long stygofaune, que large) ; et 6) telson plus large que long, à marge distale peu profondément France, eaux mixohalines, creusée, possédant deux soies robustes distales de part et d’autre. Les parentés espèce nouvelle. de cette espèce sont brièvement discutées. INTRODUCTION the type locality of the cyclopoid copepod Halicyclops troglodytes Kiefer, 1954, and harbours also one of the Th e inland groundwaters of the French Mediter- two known populations of the recently described ranean arc are home to a diverse assemblage of atyid shrimp Typhlatya arfeae Jaume & Bréhier, 2005 thalassoid crustaceans, including cirolanid and (Kiefer 1954; Jaume & Bréhier 2005). In addition, microparasellid isopods, gammarid, salentinellid the cave is inhabited by the stygobiont amphipods and ingolfi ellid amphipods, thermosbaenaceans, Niphargus angelieri Ruff o, 1954 and N. delamarei decapods, and cyclopoid copepods (Table 1; see Ruff o, 1954, plus several epigean species from the Botosaneanu 1986, and references therein; Wagner nearby Salses-Leucate coastal lagoon (viz. the cala- 1994; Jaume & Bréhier 2005). With regard to noid copepod Calanipeda aquaedulcis Kritschagin, melitid amphipods, one of the most character- 1873, the cyclopoid copepod Diacyclops bicuspida- istic thalassoid lineages in inland groundwaters tus odessanus (Schmankevitch, 1875), and the eel elsewhere, no records were known thus far from Anguilla anguilla (Linnaeus, 1758)). the region, although Pseudoniphargus adriaticus S. Together with Font Estramar (Salses-le-Château), Karaman, 1955, a widely distributed stygobiont Aven Station (Fleury), Font Caude (Gruissan), and Mediterranean marine/euryhaline species, has been few other anchialine caves from Aude and Pyrénées- collected repeatedly at marine interstitial stations Orientales not yet sampled, Grotte des Fées de Leu- from Banyuls (Pyrénées-Orientales) to Le Brusc cate represents an original habitat which has proved (Var) (Stock 1980). to harbour a peculiar fauna not present anywhere Here we report the discovery of a new species of else. Even though the cave was sampled repeatedly Pseudoniphargus Chevreux, 1901 from an anchialine between April 2003 and June 2005, Pseudoniphargus cave located on the inner margin of the coastal lagoon leucatensis n. sp. appeared there only once, and only of Salses-Leucate (Aude). Th e cave, Grotte des Fées fi ve specimens were found. Furthermore, searches of de Leucate, is a classical stygofaunal site representing other anchialine (viz. Font Estramar, Aven Station, 18 ZOOSYSTEMA • 2009 • 31 (1) New French anchialine Pseudoniphargus (Crustacea, Amphipoda) TABLE 1. — Checklist of stygobiont thalassoid crustaceans from southern France. Order, family Species Amphipoda Gammaridae Latreille, 1802 Rhipidogammarus rhipidiophorus (Catta, 1878) Salentinellidae Bousfi eld, 1977 Parasalentinella rouchi Bou, 1971 Salentinella delamarei delamarei Coineau, 1962 S. delamarei macrocheles Coineau, 1967 S. gineti Balazuc, 1957 S. petiti Coineau, 1968 Ingolfi ellidae Hansen, 1903 Ingolfi ella catalanensis Coineau, 1963 I. thibaudi Coineau, 1968 Isopoda Cirolanidae Dana, 1852 Faucheria faucheri (Dollfus & Viré, 1900) Sphaeromides raymondi Dollfus, 1897 Microparasellidae S. Karaman, 1933 Angeliera phreaticola Chappuis & Delamare, 1952 Microcharon angelieri Coineau, 1963 M. doueti Coineau, 1968 M. juberthiei ramosus Coineau, 1968 Thermosbaenacea Limnosbaena sp. Decapoda Troglocaris inermis Fage, 1937 Typhlatya arfeae Jaume & Bréhier, 2005 Copepoda Halicyclops troglodytes Kiefer, 1954 N La Franqui Leucate village Grotte des Fées de Leucate Port Leucate Salses-le- Étang de Château Salses-Leucate Grau St Ange Mediterranean Le Barcarès sea FRANCE SPAIN L’Agly (river) 2 km FIG. 1. — Location of Grotte des Fées de Leucate (Leucate, Aude, France). ZOOSYSTEMA • 2009 • 31 (1) 19 Bréhier F. & Jaume D. entrance 3 entrance 5 entrance 4 entrance 1 entrance 2 lagoon 0 ? 025 50 m –34 m FIG. 2. — Profi le of Grotte des Fées de Leucate (Leucate, Aude, France). Survey: F. Bréhier, D. Gramont and G. Tixier. Font Caude) and freshwater caves in the same area and urosomites, and exclude telson length. Material is have not rendered additional specimens. deposited in the Crustacea collection of the Muséum Th e new species described herein, together with national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris (MNHN). Pseudoniphargus adriaticus, are the only members of Following Boxshall (2004), a distinction is made the genus reported to occur in metropolitan France. in antennules and antennae between articles (cor- Nevertheless, Notenboom (1988: 165) mentions the responding to subdivisions of true segments by the presence of the genus in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques formation of annuli, each lacking intrinsic muscu- (SW France), but without giving the species. lature) and proper segments (displaying intrinsic musculature). Th e so-called (medial and lateral) lobes and palp displayed by the amphipod maxil- MATERIAL AND METHODS lule are identifi ed as coxal and basal endites, and as endopod, respectively, on the basis of comparison Th e specimens were collected with baited traps set in with the basic pattern exhibited in malacostracan the deepest submerged passages of the cave for 48 h crustaceans, where this limb is biramous and com- using specialised cave diving techniques. Salinity prises protopod with coxa and basis, each with and temperature profi les of the water column were single endite, an up to 3-segmented endopod, and produced with a SEABIRD SBE19 CTD oceano- an unsegmented exopod (see Boxshall 1997). With graphic profi ler programmed to take readings every regard to the segmentation of the maxilliped, it is 0.5 s. Th e descent of the profi ler was controlled to homologised with that of the pereopods, with the a rate of c. 10 cm/s with the profi ler kept in front so-called palp corresponding to the merus-dactylus of the diver to avoid disturbing the water column. portion, whereas the inner and outer lobes are iden- Specimens were fi xed in the fi eld in 70% ethanol and tifi ed as basal and ischial endites, respectively. Th e treated in the laboratory with lactic acid to remove term “spine” in descriptions is restricted for rigid internal tissues to facilitate observation. Drawings armature elements with a hollow central core that were prepared using a camera lucida on Olympus do not articulate basally to the body integument. BH2 and Leica DM 2500 microscopes equipped with Nomarski diff erential interference
Recommended publications
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Microevolutionary Processes in the Stygobitic Genus Typhlocirolana (Isopoda Flabellifera Cirolanidae) As Inferred by Partial 12S and 16S Rdnasequences
    J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 42 (2004) 27–32 Received on 14 January 2003 Ó 2004 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin ISSN 0947–5745 1Department of Animal Biology and Genetics ‘Leo Pardi’, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 2Hydrobiology and Subterranean Ecology, University of Marrakech, Morocco; 3CNR-ISE, Florence, Italy Microevolutionary processes in the stygobitic genus Typhlocirolana (Isopoda Flabellifera Cirolanidae) as inferred by partial 12S and 16S rDNAsequences M. Baratti1,M.Yacoubi Khebiza2 and G. Messana3 Abstract Morocco is one of the regions of the world where many interesting discoveries have recently been made in the field of stygobiology, particularly concerning the cirolanid isopod fauna. One of the most interesting, variable and wide spread of these taxa is the perimediterranean stygobitic genus Typhlocirolana Racovitza, 1905, which has colonized the continental groundwater of Israel, Sicily, Spain, the Balearic Islands, Algeria and Morocco with several species. More populations have recently been found in Morocco, in some southern regions around Agadir, in High Atlas valleys near Marrakech and in the northeastern part of the country close to Oujda. The populations of these zones are not yet described and are the subject of this molecular analysis, together with other already designated species. To investigate the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the Typhlocirolana populations inhabiting the western Mediterranean basin, we analysed DNA sequences from the mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA genes. The molecular data were also used to infer the mechanisms driving the evolution of this thalassoid limnostygobitic cirolanid taxon, considered a good paleogeographic indicator because of its poor dispersion abilities. Vicariance because of paleogeographic events in the western Mediterranean basin played a prime evolutionary role in the Cirolanidae, as already suggested by morphological and ecological studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadzioidea of the NEP (Equator to Aleutians, Intertidal to Abyss): a Review Donald B
    Hadzioidea of the NEP (Equator to Aleutians, intertidal to abyss): a review Donald B. Cadien 31 August 2005 (revised 11Oct 2007) Introduction to the Hadzioidea The superfamily was originally constituted as the Melitoidea (Bousfield 1977). This concept was critiqued by J. L. Barnard and Karaman (1980), and in response Bousfield renamed the group Hadzioidea without changing its composition (Bousfield 1983). Only three families are included in this superfamily, although one of them (Hadziidae) is further divided into three unofficial groups – weckeliids, hadziids, and nuuanids. These were originally included in the broad concept of the gammaroids, but have been separated for several decades. The taxonomic position suggested by Bousfield (2001)is used here, but Barnard and Karaman and others retained them as several groups within the gammaroids s. l.. The discussion of the hadzioids in J. L. Barnard & C. M. Barnard (1983, pp. 137-140, and as “Melita Group” pp. 147-151) may help show how members of this superfamily differ from other gammaroids, and from each other. The first family in the superfamily, the Allocrangonyctidae is confined to freshwater and is not covered here. The remaining two, Hadziidae and Melitidae, are primarily marine, and are both represented in the NEP. Maera sp an undescribed species from Guana Island (Photo Yale Peabody Museum) Diagnosis of the Hadzioidea – “body not carinate nor rostrate, toothed on abdomen only (rarely on peraeon): urosome dorsal spine groups weak or lacking; sexual dimorphism strongly expressed in body size and in gnathopods, and in antenna 2 and peraeopods; antennae 2 lacking calceoli; antennae strongly developed, 1 usually much the longer, peduncular segment 2 elongate; accessory flagellum prominent (occasionally very reduced or lacking); inferior antennal sinus small or sharply incised; eye (when present) basically small, rounded, occasionally reniform.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Melitidae, the Melita Group
    Zootaxa 2260: 718–735 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Melitidae, the Melita group* J.K. LOWRY & R.T. SPRINGTHORPE Crustacea section, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2010, Australia. ([email protected]; [email protected]) * In: Lowry, J.K. & Myers, A.A. (Eds) (2009) Benthic Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Zootaxa, 2260, 1–930. Abstract In the Melita group, new records of Dulichiella pacifica Lowry & Springthorpe are reported from the Great Barrier Reef. The record of Dulichiella australis (Haswell) from the GBR is rejected. The genus Melita (M. myersi G. Karaman and M. sampsonae sp. nov.) is reported from the GBR for the first time. The genus Tegano Barnard & Karaman is amended and reported from Australian (T. atkinsae sp. nov.), New Caledonian (T. levis (Stock & Iliffe)) and Japanese (T. shiodamari (Yamato)) waters for the first time. Key words: Crustacea, Amphipoda, Melitidae, Melita group, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, taxonomy, new species, Dulichiella pacifica, Melita sampsonae, Melita myersi, Tegano atkinsae Introduction The recent description of the Maeridae Krapp-Schickel, 2008 excluded 40 genera from the Melitidae (Krapp- Schickel 2008; Lowry & Hughes 2009). This still leaves about 45 genera in four or five groups within the Melitidae (sensu lato). The Melita group of 22 genera is mainly characterised by: a laterally compressed body; small, dorsal robust setae on urosomite 2; a basofacial seta on the peduncle of uropod 1; a scale-like inner ramus; and elongate outer ramus on uropod 3 which is 1– or 2–articulate, with article 2, when present, short or long, never greatly elongate.
    [Show full text]
  • First Observations on the Phylogeny of the Families Gammaridae
    J N H, 2003, 37, 20, 2461–2486 First observations on the phylogeny of the families Gammaridae, Crangonyctidae, Melitidae, Niphargidae, Megaluropidae and Oedicerotidae (Amphipoda, Crustacea), using small subunit rDNA gene sequences ULRIKE ENGLISCH†‡, CHARLES OLIVER COLEMAN‡ and JOHANN WOLFGANG WA¨ GELE‡ †Lehrstuhl fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie, Ruhr-Universita¨t Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] ‡Humboldt-Universita¨t zu Belrin, Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Institut fu¨r Systematische Zoologie, 10099 Berlin, Germany (Accepted 21 February 2002) This study examines amphipod phylogeny based on small subunit (18S) rDNA sequence data. Complete sequences of 25 species representing six families were used to test the phylogenetic information content of this gene for reconstruction of amphipod phylogeny. The alignment proved to be informative for most of the studied taxa. The monophyly of the families Gammaridae, Crangonyctidae, Niphargidae and Oedicerotidae is supported. The Melitidae are not monophyletic in the reconstructed topologies, but weak molecular evidence for the monophyly of this group could be observed in spectra of supporting positions. A close relationship of Gammaridae+Melitidae or Gammaridae+Crangonyctidae is not supported, rather there are supporting positions for the incompatible sister-group relationship (Gammaridae+Niphargidae) and (Crangonyctidae+Niphargidae). The molecular evidence is in favour of the latter relationship. The evolution of cephalothoracic apodemes is discussed in the light of other phylogenetic hypotheses resulting from molecular data. K: rDNA, Crustacea, Amphipoda, molecular phylogeny, parsimony, maximum likelihood, Physid. Introduction During the last decade considerable advances concerning the taxonomy of amphi- pods have been achieved (Barnard and Karaman, 1991). Nevertheless, the phylogen- etic position of the major amphipod taxa is controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on the Newly Proposed Gammaridean Amphipod Families Crangonycidae and Melitidae
    COMMENTS ON THE NEWLY PROPOSED GAMMARIDEAN AMPHIPOD FAMILIES CRANGONYCIDAE AND MELITIDAE BY JOHN R. HOLSINGER Department of Biology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23508, U.S.A. Bousfield (1973), in his recent book entitled "Shallow-water Gammaridean Amphipoda of New England", has elevated the Crangonyx group to the family Crangonycidae and the melitids to the family Melitidae. The division of the heterogeneous and widely distributed family Gammaridae into separate families that more clearly reflect evolutionary phylogenies and delineate natural groups is certainly justified. However, in view of the many unresolved taxonomic and zoo- geography problems within the Gammaridae and especially within the generic clusters making up the crangonycids and the melitids, the erection of the new families Crangonycidae and Melitidae seems to me to be premature. The three or four of us (M. Straškraba and myself in particular) who are currently working on genera and species in the Crangonyx group on a world-wide basis have still failed to reach agreement on precisely how to define this group, much less elevate it to familial level. Moreover, the taxonomic status of the melitids (roughly equivalent to the Hadzia group; see Holsinger & Minckley, 1 97 1 ) is also in a state of flux. In my opinion, the most acceptable approach to the subdivision of Gammaridae would be to treat newly established families on a cosmopolitan basis, considering all potential genera, their morphological affinities, distributional patterns, etc., inste4d of choosing only a few examples from a narrowly defined geographical region and basing whole new taxa on them. The elevation of the Crangonyx group, an exclusively freshwater group of amphipods, to the familial level seems out of place in a guidebook devoted almost entirely to marine and brackish water amphipods of the New England region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Saco Estuary Final Report 2015 Sustaining the Saco Estuary
    Sustaining the Saco estuary final report 2015 Sustaining the Saco estuary final report 2015 Project Leaders Christine B. Feurt, Ph.D. Pamela A. Morgan, Ph.D. University of New England and University of New England Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Tel: (207) 602-2227 Tel: (207) 602-2834 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Project Team University of New England Mark Adams, Ph.D. Noah Perlut, Ph.D. Anna Bass, Ph.D. Michele Steen-Adams, Ph.D. Carrie Byron, Ph.D. James Sulikowski, Ph.D. Michael Daley, Ph.D. Stephan I. Zeeman, Ph.D. Michael Esty Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve Jacob Aman Jeremy Miller Michele Dionne, Ph.D. Kristin Wilson, Ph.D. This research is part of Maine’s Sustainability Solutions Initiative, a program of the Senator George J. Mitchell Center, which is supported by National Science Foundation award EPS-0904155 to Maine EPSCoR at the University of Maine. Report Editing and Design: Waterview Consulting CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: Why Is the Saco Estuary an Ideal Living Laboratory for Sustainability Science?.......................1 by Christine B. Feurt and Pamela A. Morgan CHAPTER 2 RECOGNIZING AND ENGAGING THE StewardsHIP NETWORK: Actively Working to Sustain the Saco Estuary .......7 by Christine B. Feurt CHAPTER 3 PLANTS OF THE SACO EstuarY: Tidal Marshes............17 by Pam Morgan CHAPTER 4 BENTHIC MACROINVertebrates OF THE SACO EstuarY: Tidal Flats and Low Marsh Habitats .......................29 by Anna L. Bass CHAPTER 5 FISH OF THE SACO EstuarY: River Channel and Tidal Marshes ........................................39 by Kayla Smith, Kristin Wilson, James Sulikowski, and Jacob Aman CHAPTER 6 BIRD COMMUNITY OF THE SACO EstuarY: Tidal Marshes ...57 by Noah Perlut CHAPTER 7 FOOD WEB OF THE SACO Estuary’S Tidal MARSHES .
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipoda Key to Amphipoda Gammaridea
    GRBQ188-2777G-CH27[411-693].qxd 5/3/07 05:38 PM Page 545 Techbooks (PPG Quark) Dojiri, M., and J. Sieg, 1997. The Tanaidacea, pp. 181–278. In: J. A. Blake stranded medusae or salps. The Gammaridea (scuds, land- and P. H. Scott, Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa hoppers, and beachhoppers) (plate 254E) are the most abun- Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. 11. The Crustacea. dant and familiar amphipods. They occur in pelagic and Part 2 The Isopoda, Cumacea and Tanaidacea. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California. benthic habitats of fresh, brackish, and marine waters, the Hatch, M. H. 1947. The Chelifera and Isopoda of Washington and supralittoral fringe of the seashore, and in a few damp terres- adjacent regions. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 10: 155–274. trial habitats and are difficult to overlook. The wormlike, 2- Holdich, D. M., and J. A. Jones. 1983. Tanaids: keys and notes for the mm-long interstitial Ingofiellidea (plate 254D) has not been identification of the species. New York: Cambridge University Press. reported from the eastern Pacific, but they may slip through Howard, A. D. 1952. Molluscan shells occupied by tanaids. Nautilus 65: 74–75. standard sieves and their interstitial habitats are poorly sam- Lang, K. 1950. The genus Pancolus Richardson and some remarks on pled. Paratanais euelpis Barnard (Tanaidacea). Arkiv. for Zool. 1: 357–360. Lang, K. 1956. Neotanaidae nov. fam., with some remarks on the phy- logeny of the Tanaidacea. Arkiv. for Zool. 9: 469–475. Key to Amphipoda Lang, K.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific
    Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific (Equator to Aleutians, intertidal to abyss): XIV. Gammaroidea – an updated and expanded review Donald B. Cadien, LACSD 22Jul2004 (revised 1Mar2015) Preface The purpose of this review is to bring together information on all of the species reported to occur in the NEP fauna. It is not a straight path to the identification of your unknown animal. It is a resource guide to assist you in making the required identification in full knowledge of what the possibilities are. Never forget that there are other, as yet unreported species from the coverage area; some described, some new to science. The natural world is wonderfully diverse, and we have just scratched its surface. Introduction to the Gammaroidea The superfamily, while having both marine and freshwater members, is most prominent in epigean fresh-waters. Marine occurrences are coastal, with no superfamily members belonging to pelagic or deep-sea communities. There is a vast literature on the fresh-water members of the superfamily, particularly in European waters, where they have been studied for centuries. According to Bousfield (1982) they are a fairly recently derived group which appeared in the Tertiary. The superfamily contains a number of families not represented in the NEP, including the Acanthogammaridae, Caspicolidae, Macrohectopidae, Micruropidae, Pachyschesidae, and the Typhlogammaridae. These families are most prominent in Indo- European fresh-water habitats. The Gammaridae is poorly represented in the NEP, with only one widely distributed arctic-boreal form, and two species introduced from the Atlantic. One additional member of the family has been introduced to the waters of the saline relict Salton Sea, now landlocked in southern California (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Common Tidal Marsh Invertebrates of the Northeastern
    - J Mississippi Alabama Sea Grant Consortium MASGP - 79 - 004 Guide to Common Tidal Marsh Invertebrates of the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico by Richard W. Heard University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 and Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, MS 39564* Illustrations by Linda B. Lutz This work is a result of research sponsored in part by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, under Grant Nos. 04-S-MOl-92, NA79AA-D-00049, and NASIAA-D-00050, by the Mississippi-Alabama Sea Gram Consortium, by the University of South Alabama, by the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, and by the Marine Environmental Sciences Consortium. The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for govern­ mental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. • Present address. This Handbook is dedicated to WILL HOLMES friend and gentleman Copyright© 1982 by Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium and R. W. Heard All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission from the author. CONTENTS PREFACE . ....... .... ......... .... Family Mysidae. .. .. .. .. .. 27 Order Tanaidacea (Tanaids) . ..... .. 28 INTRODUCTION ........................ Family Paratanaidae.. .. .. .. 29 SALTMARSH INVERTEBRATES. .. .. .. 3 Family Apseudidae . .. .. .. .. 30 Order Cumacea. .. .. .. .. 30 Phylum Cnidaria (=Coelenterata) .. .. .. .. 3 Family Nannasticidae. .. .. 31 Class Anthozoa. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3 Order Isopoda (Isopods) . .. .. .. 32 Family Edwardsiidae . .. .. .. .. 3 Family Anthuridae (Anthurids) . .. 32 Phylum Annelida (Annelids) . .. .. .. .. .. 3 Family Sphaeromidae (Sphaeromids) 32 Class Oligochaeta (Oligochaetes). .. .. .. 3 Family Munnidae . .. .. .. .. 34 Class Hirudinea (Leeches) . .. .. .. 4 Family Asellidae . .. .. .. .. 34 Class Polychaeta (polychaetes).. .. .. .. .. 4 Family Bopyridae . .. .. .. .. 35 Family Nereidae (Nereids). .. .. .. .. 4 Order Amphipoda (Amphipods) . ... 36 Family Pilargiidae (pilargiids). .. .. .. .. 6 Family Hyalidae .
    [Show full text]
  • Abludomelita Obtusata (Montagu, 1813)
    Abludomelita obtusata (Montagu, 1813) AphiaID: 102788 ANFÍPODE Animalia (Reino) >Arthropoda (Filo) >Crustacea (Subfilo) >Multicrustacea (Superclasse) >Malacostraca (Classe) >Eumalacostraca (Subclasse) > Peracarida (Superordem) > Amphipoda (Ordem) > Senticaudata (Subordem) > Hadziida (Infraordem) > Hadziidira (Parvordem) > Hadzioidea (Superfamilia) > Melitidae (Familia) Hans Hillewaert Hans Hillewaert, via Wikimedia Commons Sinónimos Cancer (Gammarus) obtusatus Montagu, 1813 Cancer obtusatus Montagu, 1813 Melita obtusata (Montagu, 1813) Referências additional source Howson, C. M.; Picton, B. E. (1997). The species directory of the marine fauna and flora of the British Isles and surrounding seas. Ulster Museum Publication, 276. The Ulster Museum: Belfast, UK. ISBN 0-948150-06-8. vi, 508 (+ cd-rom) pp. [details] basis of record Bellan-Santini, D.; Costello, M.J. (2001). Amphipoda. in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels 50: pp. 295-308. [details] additional source Bachelet, G.; Dauvin, J.-C.; Sorbe, J.C. (2003). An updated checklist of marine and brackish water Amphipoda (Crustacea: Peracarida) of the southern Bay of Biscay (NE Atlantic). Cah. 1 Biol. Mar. 44(2): 121-151 [details] additional source Muller, Y. (2004). Faune et flore du littoral du Nord, du Pas-de-Calais et de la Belgique: inventaire. [Coastal fauna and flora of the Nord, Pas-de-Calais and Belgium: inventory]. Commission Régionale de Biologie Région Nord Pas-de-Calais: France. 307 pp., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/145561.pdf [details] original description Montagu, George. (1813 [not 1815]). Descriptions of several new or rare animals, principally marine, discovered on the South coast of Devonshire.
    [Show full text]
  • (Amphipoda) Pseudoniphargus, Formerly Usually Pseudoniphargus
    Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 50 (1): 105-144 — 1980 Regression model evolution as exemplified by the genus Pseudoniphargus (Amphipoda) by Jan H. Stock Institute of Taxonomie Zoology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract A forma described in 1955 by S. Karaman, was raised to specific rank by G. Karaman in 1978. The has been considered genus Pseudoniphargus long mono- In the I have revised of the present paper, most specific. Its unique species, Ps. africanus, was supposed to materials attributed to the as well occur both sides of the the Atlantic existing on Mediterranean, on genus, Iberian Ma- side of the peninsula, on the Azores, and on as a good number of newly collected samples. This deira, in localities from the shore than ranging sea to more nine named resulted in a classification into species, 1000 m of altitude, and covering almost the entire natural and a number of unnamed left-overs because of salinity range (0-36‰). A taxonomie revision revealed that at least nine named insufficient material. The actual names for the species and several unnamed forms (of which insufficient taxa of Pseudoniphargus, formerly usually recorded material is available) hide under the name Ps. africanus, Ps. shown in table each with and as africanus, are I. a narrow ecological geographical range. The evolutionary scenario of the members of the is Like in the Gammarus identification of genus group, discussed of marine at some length: they are presumably females is much more difficult than that of males. origin, and got adapted to conditions of continental waters both sexes should be available for a during various marine regressions in the Eocene and Oligo- Preferably cène, but notably in the Miocene.
    [Show full text]