EVALUATION of Ceiba Pentandra for STEM DIEBACK DISEASE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EVALUATION OF Ceiba pentandra FOR STEM DIEBACK DISEASE RESISTANCE AND CHARACTERIZATION BY MOLECULAR MARKERS BY COSMAS SORNGMENENYE ABENGMENENG A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SILVICULTURE AND FOREST MANAGEMENT, KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN SILVICULTURE AND FOREST MANAGEMENT FACULTY OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES, COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES SEPTEMBER 2013 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the PhD and that, to the best of my knowledge; it contains neither material previously published by another person nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree of the University. References to other peoples’ works have been duly acknowledged. …………………………… …………………….. ………….. Student Name Signature Date Certified by: …………………………… …………………….. ………….. 1. Supervisor’s Name Signature Date …………………………… …………………….. ………….. 2. Supervisors’ Name Signature Date …………………………… …………………….. ………….. 3. Supervisor’s Name Signature Date Certified by: …………………………… …………………….. ………….. Head of Department’s Name Signature Date ii Abengmeneng, 2013 DEDICATION This project work is dedicated to the Almighty God, my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit of God for being the source of my wisdom and the anchor of my life. I also dedicate this work to my parents, Mr. and Mrs. Abengmeneng, and my siblings for their prayers, patience, support and understanding. Last but not the least, I dedicate this work to my children and to all brilliant but needy students as an encouragement to be determined and work hard. iii Abengmeneng, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my sincere thanks to the Almighty God for His wonderful wisdom, infinite love and the spiritual guidance that enabled me to produce this piece of work. I remain deeply indebted to my supervisors, Dr. Philomena Kumapley (Department of Silviculture and Forest Management, FRNR-KNUST), Dr. Daniel A. Ofori (Forestry Research Institute of Ghana-Kumasi; and currently at World Agroforestry Centre- ICRAF, Nairobi-Kenya) and Prof. Richard Akromah (Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture-KNUST), for being ready for consultation even outside working days and for their constructive criticisms that have helped shaped this write up. I am very grateful to Dr. Marian D. Quain (Crops Research Institute of Ghana, Fumesua-Kumasi) for guiding me in my practical work. I owe many thanks to the International Foundation for Science (IFS), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology and Tropenbos International Ghana for their financial support. My appreciation also goes to the Director, Management and Staff of the Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Fumesua-Kumasi and the Crops Research Institute, Fumesua- Kumasi, for giving me access to their research environment and facilities. A special note of thanks also goes to all the Laboratory Technicians at the Forestry Research Institute of Ghana-Kumasi and Crops Research Institute, Fumesua-Kuamsi, for their assistance during my practical time in the Biotechnology Laboratories of their respective institutions. I am also grateful to all my lecturers, friends and relations whose contributions in diverse ways have led to the successful completion of this thesis. iv Abengmeneng, 2013 ABSTRACT Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gartn is an important multi-purpose tree species in Ghana and demand for it is rising daily. However, the occurrence of stem dieback disease at the nursery and plantations, coupled with the absence of adequate information on resistance levels and the genetic diversity within and among populations, has limited the success of efforts geared at devising efficient strategies for its sustainable management. This study assessed resistance levels through progeny evaluation at both the nursery and in the field. Narrow sense heritability and genetic gain in stem height were also estimated. The diversity among accessions was characterized using five morphological traits. The genetic diversity and gene flow within and among five populations of the species were also studied using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers. The study also looked at markers that are linked to stem dieback resistance. Screening at the nursery from September to November (SNS) showed survival level ranged from 0.20% to 79.20 %. March to May screening (MMS) showed that all the 59 accessions screened had varied levels of survival ranging from 24.4 % to 100 %. Mortality rate was generally higher in the SNS than the MMS. Field study showed that 5 (13.51 %), 9 (24.33%) and 23 (62.16 %) accessions, out of 37 screened, had survival levels between 70.00 and 100 %, 50.00 and 69.90 % and below 50.00 %, respectively. There were significant differences in mean mortality rates among accessions in the nursery and field studies and also in mean stem height and mean diameter growth (P < 0.001). Narrow sense heritability was 0.56 and genetic gain in height ranged from -29.58 to 20.89 cm/yr. Mean population diversity index, using the Shannon Information Index (I), was 0.425 ± 0.024, 0.306 ± 0.027 and 0.371 ± 0.018 for the RAPD, ISSR and the combined RAPD and ISSR, respectively. Gene flow estimates v Abengmeneng, 2013 showed low to moderate differences among populations with Gst values at 0.0751, 0.0736 and 0.0799 for the RAPD, ISSR and combined RAPD and ISSR, respectively. Ninety-eight percent of the population differentiation was attributed to within population variation with RAPD polymorphism. ISSR and the combined RAPD and ISSR both showed that a high proportion of genetic diversity resided within populations. Chi- square and G-square tests showed differences among population. Percentage polymorphic loci, Ewens-Watterson Neutrality Test, Nei diversity and Shannon diversity indices, showed Dry Semi-deciduous Forest Inner Zone as the most diverse population. Principal component analysis, defined by axes 1 and 2, accounted for 67.15% of the total variation among accessions. None of the ten markers used was able to differentiate between resistant and susceptible accessions. Nine accessions were identified for conservation as seed trees. Dry Semi-deciduous Forest Inner Zone (DSDFZ-Inner) < Dry Semi-deciduous Forest Outer Zone (DSDFZ-Outlier) < Guinea Savanna Zone (GSZ) < Moist Semi-deciduous Forest Zone (MSDFZ) < Moist/Wet Evergreen Forest Zone (M/WEFZ), in order of decreasing importance, should be preferred in C. pentandra seed collection expedition. Decision making for long-term conservation of C. pentandra should be made on the basis of both morphological and molecular considerations. Sampling for seed trees should be concentrated on selecting resistant and unrelated accessions within populations rather than collecting bits from the entire range of the species. Known resistant and susceptible lines should be used in further assessment for dieback resistant markers. A large number of dominant markers and the use of co-dominant markers should also be investigated. vi Abengmeneng, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE Declaration ..................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................ iv Abstract………………………………………………………………………………..v Table of contents .......................................................................................................... vii List of tables .................................................................................................................. xi List of figures .............................................................................................................. xiv List of appendices ....................................................................................................... xvi List of abbreviations ................................................................................................ xviii CHAPTER 1 General Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Statement of the problem ......................................................................................... 4 1.3 Research objectives .................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Key questions of the research .................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review .................................................................................... 8 2.1 Characteristics of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn ...................................................... 8 2.2 Sustainable forest management (SFM) .................................................................. 11 2.3 Plantations as tools for sustainable forest management ......................................... 13 2.4 Dieback disease: a threat to sustainable forest management ................................. 14 2.5 Disease control, resistance and susceptibility in plants ......................................... 16 2.6 Genetic variation in forest trees ............................................................................