DOCSLIB.ORG

Criminal Law Involuntary Manslaughter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Criminal Law Involuntary Manslaughter ~ .- ” a .. ,, .rl (I ‘I .. i The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Jack Beatson Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1 N 2BQ. This Consultation Paper, completed for publication on 25 February 1994, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on this Consultation Paper before 31 October 1994. All correspondence should be addressed to: Ms C Haslet1 Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1 N 2BQ Tel: 071-41 1 1214 Fax: 071-41 1 1297 It may be helpful for the Law Commission, either in discussion with others concerned or I in any subsequent recommendations, to be able to refer to and attribute comments submitted in response to this Consultation Paper. Any request to treat all, or part, of a response in confidence will, of course, be respected, but if no such request is made the Law Commission will assume that the response is not intended to be confidential. ! i i i. ~__ The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 135 Criminal Law Involuntary Manslaughter A Consultation Paper, HMSO 0 Crown copyright 1994 Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO ISBN 0 1 I 7302 19 8 17-122-01 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page PART I: SCOPE AND BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT A. THE FRAMEWORK IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS SET 1.1-1.21 1 B. THE PROBLEMS OF THE PRESENT LAW 1.22-1.24 8 C. MANSLAUGHTER AS PART OF THE LAW OF HOMICIDE 1.25-1.26 9 PART 11: UNLAWFUL ACT MANSLAUGHTER A. INTRODUCTION 2.1-2.4 10 B. AN UNLAWFUL ACT 2.5-2.20 11 C. DANGEROUSNESS 2.2 1-2.26 19 D. THE NATURE OF THE REQUIRED CAUSAL LINK 2.27-2.38 21 E. THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE ACT MUST HAVE BEEN "DIRECTED AT" THE DECEASED 2.39-2.42 26 F. RvSCARLETT 2.43-2.47 27 G. THE POSITION IN OTHER COMMON LAW JURISDICTIONS 2.48-2.51 30 H. PROPOSALS FOR REFORM 2.52-2 ..56 32 PART 111: GROSS NEGLIGENCE MANSLAUGHTER A. INTRODUCTION 3.1-3.3 35 B. R v BATEMAN 3.4-3.5 35 C. NEGLIGENCE AND THE DUTY TO TAKE CARE 3.6-3.10 36 The duty to act: liability for omissions 3.1 1-3.18 37 The duty owed by experts 3.19-3.21 40 Other instances of the duty to take care 3.22 40 The "duty of care" as "standard of care" 3.23-3.25 40 Breach of the duty: the standard of care 3.26-3.30 41 Gross negligence 3.3 1-3.41 43 Gross negligence in other jurisdictions 3.42-3.58 46 D. THE MEANING OF "RECKLESSNESS" BEFORE SEYMOUR 3.59-3.60 51 "Recklessness" as a degree of "negligence" 3.61-3.68 51 The meaning of "recklessness": indifference 3.69-3.76 53 Subjective recklessness 3.77-3.82 56 The meaning of "recklessness" in the law of manslaughter of some overseas jurisdictions 3.83-3.90 59 A distinction between recklessness and / negligence based on the seriousness of the ,' harm risked 3.9 1-3.98 61 E. CALDWLL RECKLESSNESS: R v SEYMOUR 3.99-3.104 65 A comparison between Seymour and Andrews 3.105-3.109 67 Kong Cheuk Kwan 3.110-3.112 68 The case-law between Kong Cheuk Kwan and Reid 3.113-3.1 18 69 R v Reid 3.119-3.120 71 ... 111 Paragraphs Page F. R v PREWCE 71 The judgment of the Court of Appeal 3.121-3.133 71 "Breach of duty" in Prentice 3.134-3.139 75 Prentice: a summation 3.140 77 Prentice and the general law of manslaughter 3.141 -3.144 78 The practical application of the new law 3.145-3.155 79 G. MOTOR MANSLAUGHTER 3.156-3.167 82 H. RECKLESSNESS AS A FORMER ELEMENT OF THE LAW OF MURDER 3.168-3.170 87 PART IV: THE LIABILITY OF CORPORATIONS A. INTRODUCTION 4.1-4.4 89 B. THE GENERAL LAW OF CORPORATE LIABILITY 90 Background 4.5-4.6 90 The early development of corporate liability 4.7-4.10 91 The principle of identification 4.11-4.15 93 The controlling officers 4.16-4.20 95 C. CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR MANSLAUGHTER 97 The general theory 4.2 1-4.30 97 The rejection of the principle of aggregation and the requirement that an individual "controlling officer" should be guilty 4.3 1-4.37 101 The "obviousness" of the risk in the prosecution of P&O European Ferries (Dover) Ltd 4.38-4.45 104 PART V: OPTIONS FOR REFORM A. UNLAWFUL ACT MANSLAUGHTER 5.1-5.15 108 B. MANSLAUGHTER BY SUBJECTIVE RECKLESSNESS 5.16-5.21 112 C. MOTOR MANSLAUGHTER 114 Introduction 5.22-5.24 114 The disapplication of manslaughter to killings by use of motor vehicles 5.25-5.26 114 The reversal of Seymour 5.27-5.29 115 D. A GENERAL LAW OF MANSLAUGHTER 116 Introduction 5.30 116 Should there be a law of manslaughter at all? 5.31-5.32 116 The special position of homicide 5.33-5.35 116 Accidental and non-accidental death 5.36-5.37 117 The function of the criminal law 5.38-5.43 117 E. ANEWSTART 119 The nature of the offence 5.44-5.48 119 Manslaughter: a crime about death 5.49-5.56 121 The standard of culpability 5.57-5.64 123 Some specific considerations 5.65-5.69 125 F. PUNISHMENT 5.70-5.7 1 127 G. CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR MANSLAUGHTER 127 Introduction 5.72-5.73 127 iv Paragraphs Page The difficulties of corporate liability 5.74-5.76 128 Corporate liability and manslaughter 5.77-5.78 129 The corporation should have been aware of the risk 5.79-5.84 129 The corporation’s conduct fell seriously and significantly below what could reasonably have been demanded of it in dealing with that risk 5.85-5.90 131 H. THE PUNISHMENT OF CORPORATIONS 5.91-5.92 133 PART VI: SUMMARY OF OUR PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS A. UNLAWFUL ACT MANSLAUGHTER 6.2-6.3 134 B. MANSLAUGHTER BY SUBJECTIVE RECKLESSNESS 6.4 134 C. MOTOR MANSLAUGHTER 6.5-6.7 135 D. THE GENERAL LAW OF MANSLAUGHTER 6.8-6.19 135 E. PUNISHMENT 6.20 136 F. CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR MANSLAUGHTER 6.21-6.22 136 V INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER PART I SCOPE AND BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT A. The framework in which the project is set 1.1 This Consultation Paper is concerned with that part of our criminal law which is called, perhaps not entirely happily, "involuntary" manslaughter. The law of involuntary manslaughter today has two, separate, main branches:' causing death in the course of doing an unlawful act and causing death by an act of recklessness or by "gross negligence". 1.2 The Paper is not concerned with those parts of the law of manslaughter (sometimes collectively called the law of voluntary manslaughter) which depend on the presence of the necessary mens rea for murder, and are therefore most easily regarded as partial defences to a charge of murder. The law of killing whilst under diminished responsibility,' the law of killing whilst under provocation3 and killing by a survivor of a suicide pact4 are therefore not discussed in the Paper. 1.3 We believe we should explain the reasons why we have decided to limit the scope of this new law reform project in this way. In 1989 we published our report on a Criminal Code for England and Wales.' This represented the culmination of eight years of work which had the central purpose of making the criminal law more accessible, comprehensible, consistent and certain. The Code was not in itself an exercise in law reform, although it included among its provisions certain unimplemented recommendations for law reform made in recent years by official bodies, including ourselves, or by ad hoc committees whose recommendations carried weight. 1.4 We are now embarked on the next part of this major exercise, which is to take different areas of the criminal law and to subject them to critical scrutiny with a view to producing a series of discrete law reform Bills, each complete in themselves, and ready for immediate implementation. These will also serve, once they have passed into law, as the material for consolidation into the complete Criminal Code which this country so badly ' A third topic, killing by an act of subjective recklessness, has recently fallen into this area, and is considered at paras 5.16-5.21 below. Homicide Act 1957, s 2. Bid, s 3. Bid, s 4. Criminal Law: A Criminal Code for England and Wales, (1989) Law Corn No 177. 1 needs.6 In November 1993 we published a report, on non-fatal Offences against the Person and General Principles, which formed the first stage of this part of our work.7 This report received support on its publication' which was just as enthusiastic as the support we received at its consultation stage,9 and it is now available to be enacted as soon as Parliament can find the time for such an essential and much-needed piece of criminal law reform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam
    A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION This page is blank A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM CONTRACT NUMBER TS/MTRIPS/WKS/2017/01 CONTRACT DOCUMENT VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION This page is blank A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification TRANSPORT SCOTLAND THE A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM TS/MTRIPS/WKS/2017/01 CONTRACT DOCUMENT VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT ISSUE RECORD I hereby confirm that this is the current version of the Specification and supersedes all previous issues of such document by the Employer. Signed Name (Block capitals) Date Contractor Copy of signed page shall be sent to, Transport Scotland, [REDACTED] Contract Document i 21 September 201801 November 2018 A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification This page is blank Contract Document ii 21 September 201801 November 2018 A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION CONTENTS Page PREAMBLE TO THE SPECIFICATION ......................................................................................... 1 SCHEDULE OF PAGES AND RELEVANT PUBLICATION DATES OF SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY WORKS ................................................................................ 3 APPENDIX 0/1: CONTRACT-SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL, SUBSTITUTE AND CANCELLED CLAUSES, TABLES AND FIGURES INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT........... 7 APPENDIX 0/2: CONTRACT-SPECIFIC MINOR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING CLAUSES, TABLES AND FIGURES INCLUDED
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Juridical Yearbook, 2001
    Extract from: UNITED NATIONS JURIDICAL YEARBOOK 2001 Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations Chapter VIII. Decisions of national tribunals Copyright (c) United Nations CONTENTS (continued) Page Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating to the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations CHAPTER VII . ED CISIONS AND ADVISORY OPINIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS Arbitration Tribunal constituted by the Government of the French Republic and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to consider the question of the tax regime governing pensions paid to retired UNESCO officials residing in France . 421 CHAPTER viii . DECISIONS OF NATIONAL TRIBUNALS 1. The Netherlands The Hague District Court—Civil Law Division—President Judgement in interlocutory injunction proceedings of 31 August 2001 Plea of Slobodan Milošević for release from detention by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and returned to the territory of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ....................................... 445 2. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (a) High Court of Justiciary—30 March 2001 Opinion of High Court involving the International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons under international law . 450 (b) House of Lords Shanning International Ltd v. Lloyds TSB Bank plc; Lloyds TSB Bank plc v. Rasheed Bank (28 June 2001) An appeal from the Court of Appeal concerning United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait . 491 (c) Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) R (on the application of Othman) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (28 November 2001) Judicial review of decision of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, involving United Nations Security Council sanctions in relation to the situation in Afghanistan and the Taliban .
    [Show full text]
  • Dial H for Homicide: Il Buono, Il Cattivo, Il Brutto
    DIAL H FOR HOMICIDE: IL BUONO, IL CATTIVO, IL BRUTTO George L. Schraer To whom the following words of Ronald Reagan not only fully apply, but aptly and applicably apply: “Deep down, he’s shallow” TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. 1 I. General Overview. 3 II. A Few Preliminary Concepts. 4 A. Fetal Attraction.. 4 B. Causation. 5 C. Jury Unanimity. 8 III. First Degree Murder. 10 A. Premeditated Murder. 11 1. Express Malice. 11 2. Premeditation and Deliberation. 14 B. Murder by Various Means. 15 1. Destructive Device or Explosive. 16 2. Lying in Wait. 17 3. Torture.. 19 C. First Degree Felony Murder. 20 IV. Second Degree Murder. 25 A. Second Degree Murder With Express Malice But Without Premeditation or Deliberation. 25 B. Second Degree Murder with Implied Malice.. 25 C. Second Degree Murder Based on Provocation Sufficient to Negate Premeditation or Deliberation. 32 D. Second Degree Felony Murder. 33 1. General Principles of Law. 33 2. Inherently Dangerous Felonies.. 34 i 3. The Merger or Ireland Doctrine. 36 V. Attempted Murder and Attempted Manslaughter. 38 A. Attempted Murder. 38 1. General Legal Principles.. 38 2. Kill Zone. 40 B. Attempted Manslaughter. 43 VI. Voluntary Manslaughter. 44 A. Sudden Quarrel/Heat of Passion. 45 B. Imperfect Self-Defense.. 48 C. Imperfect Defense of Others. 51 VII. Involuntary Manslaughter. 51 A. Misdemeanor Involuntary Manslaughter . 52 B. Lawful Act Involuntary Manslaughter . 53 C. Felony Involuntary Manslaughter. 55 D. Additional Theories of Involuntary Manslaughter. 56 VIII. Vehicular Manslaughter. 60 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. FAULT-BASED AND STRICT LIABILITY IN THE LAW OF NEIGHBOURS MARÍA PAZ GATICA RODRÍGUEZ Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2017 Abstract By the end of the twentieth century, and after a long line of conflicting case law, the question about the basis of liability in nuisance was settled: in Scotland, damages are awarded only upon proof of fault (RHM Bakeries (Scotland) Ltd v Strathclyde Regional Council 1985 SC (HL) 17). Fault, in turn, can adopt many forms: malice, intention, recklessness, negligence, and conduct causing a special risk of abnormal damage (Kennedy v Glenbelle Ltd 1995 SC 95). Many aspects of this seemingly clear picture, however, remain problematic. On the one hand, the way in which this model is interpreted and applied gives place to particular forms of liability that can actually be characterised as strict.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Assault Includes Both a Specific Intent to Commit a Battery, and a Battery That Is Otherwise Unprivileged Committed with Only General Intent
    QUESTION 5 Don has owned Don's Market in the central city for twelve years. He has been robbed and burglarized ten times in the past ten months. The police have never arrested anyone. At a neighborhood crime prevention meeting, apolice officer told Don of the state's new "shoot the burglar" law. That law reads: Any citizen may defend his or her place of residence against intrusion by a burglar, or other felon, by the use of deadly force. Don moved a cot and a hot plate into the back of the Market and began sleeping there, with a shotgun at the ready. After several weeks of waiting, one night Don heard noises. When he went to the door, he saw several young men running away. It then dawned on him that, even with the shotgun, he might be in a precarious position. He would likely only get one shot and any burglars would get the next ones. With this in mind, he loaded the shotgun and fastened it to the counter, facing the front door. He attached a string to the trigger so that the gun would fire when the door was opened. Next, thinking that when burglars enter it would be better if they damaged as little as possible, he unlocked the front door. He then went out the back window and down the block to sleep at his girlfriend's, where he had been staying for most of the past year. That same night a police officer, making his rounds, tried the door of the Market, found it open, poked his head in, and was severely wounded by the blast.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 200 - Crimes Against the Person
    CHAPTER 200 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON HOMICIDE SECTION 200.010 “Murder” defined. SECTION 200.020 Malice: Express and implied defined. SECTION 200.035 Circumstances mitigating first degree murder. SECTION 200.040 “Manslaughter” defined. SECTION 200.050 “Voluntary manslaughter” defined. SECTION 200.060 When killing punished as murder. SECTION 200.070 “Involuntary manslaughter” defined. SECTION 200.080 Punishment for voluntary manslaughter. SECTION 200.090 Punishment for involuntary manslaughter. SECTION 200.120 “Justifiable homicide” defined. SECTION 200.130 Bare fear insufficient to justify killing; reasonable fear required. SECTION 200.140 Justifiable homicide by public officer. SECTION 200.150 Justifiable or excusable homicide. SECTION 200.160 Additional cases of justifiable homicide. SECTION 200.180 Excusable homicide by misadventure. SECTION 200.190 Justifiable or excusable homicide not punishable. SECTION 200.200 Killing in self-defense. SECTION 200.210 Killing of unborn quick child; penalty. SECTION 200.240 Owner of animal that kills human being guilty of manslaughter under certain circumstances; penalty. SECTION 200.260 Death resulting from unlawful manufacture or storage of explosives; penalty. BODILY INJURY SECTION 200.275 Justifiable infliction or threat of bodily injury not punishable. MAYHEM SECTION 200.280 Definition; penalty. SECTION 200.290 Instrument or manner of inflicting injury immaterial. SECTION 200.300 Injury not resulting in permanent injury; defendant may be convicted of assault. KIDNAPPING SECTION 200.310 Degrees. SECTION 200.320 Kidnapping in first degree: Penalties. SECTION 200.330 Kidnapping in second degree: Penalties. SECTION 200.340 Penalty for aiding or abetting. SECTION 200.350 Where proceedings may be instituted; consent is not defense. SECTION 200.357 Law enforcement officer required to take child into protective custody if child in danger of being removed from jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Protection Handed to the DG for “Law, Order and Security”
    statewatch monitoring the state and civil liberties in the UK and Europe vol 15 no 2 March-April 2005 EU policy “putsch”: Data protection handed to the DG for “law, order and security” In a little reported decision the full European Commission the individual. The draft articles in the draft Framework meeting on 11 February 2005 the policy brief for data protection Decisions on exchanging information and intelligence between in the EU was transferred from the Directorate-General on the law enforcement agencies and on the mandatory retention and Internal Market to the Directorate-General on "Freedom, justice exchange of telecommunications data simply refer to the secure and security". There was no public debate and no consultation transfer of the personal data between the agencies. No rights are with national or European parliaments. provided in either for the individual to be told what information The Internal Market DG has been responsible for data is held nor who it has been transferred to (which can include protection since the 1980s. In 1990 after pressure from national non-EU states). This approach is backed by the so-called data protection commissioners, the European Commission "principle of availability", namely that all information and produced a series of proposals (COM(90)314). Five years later intelligence held nationally by law enforcement agencies in all in 1995 the EU Data Protection Directive came into force. Its 25 EU member states should be available to all the other scope was limited to the "first pillar" (social and economic agencies. An unpublished overview report on this "principle" affairs) to provide protection to individuals whose data was held (EU doc no: 7416/05) says that EU citizens want "freedom, and processed by, for example, commercial companies and security and justice" and that: banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict in Selected Arab and Western Newspapers Aziza Zaher A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2009 This work is the intellectual property of Aziza Zaher. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner(s) of the Intellectual Property Rights. Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Historical Background ............................................. 3 1.1 Introduction to Research ........................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Aims of research ................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Research questions ............................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Research Hypotheses ............................................................................ 4 1.2 History of the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict ..................................................... 5 1.3 Perceptions of Israel and the Palestinians in the West ............................... 28 2 Theoretical Background ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 5 November 2019 PAGE 5-0 of CHAPTER 5 CONSULTATION and SCOPING
    CHAPTER 5 CONSULTATIONNovember 2019 AND SCOPING PAGE 5-0 OF CHAPTER 5 Cross Tay Link Road Revision Date Status Author Technical Checker Approver Number Reviewer WORK IN P01.1 04.01.19 E COOPER R FERGUSON R McLEAN D RITCHIE PROGRESS S4 FOR P01 05.11.19 STAGE E COOPER R McLEAN R McLEAN D RITCHIE APPROVAL BIM Number: 119046-SWECO-EGN-000-RP-EN-20006 This document has been prepared on behalf of Perth and Kinross Council by Sweco for the proposed Cross Tay Link Road Project. It is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. Sweco accepts no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. Prepared for: Prepared by: Perth and Kinross Council Sweco Pullar House Suite 4.2, City Park 35 Kinnoull Street 368 Alexandra Parade Perth Glasgow PH1 5GD G31 3AU CONTENTS 5 CONSULTATION AND SCOPING ........................................................................................ 1 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 5.2 Purpose of Consultation ........................................................................................................... 1 5.3 Public Events ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INQUEST Evidence Submission to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on “Systemic Racism, Violations Of
    INQUEST evidence submission to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights report on “systemic racism, violations of international human rights law against Africans and people of African descent by law enforcement agencies, especially those incidents that resulted in the death of George Floyd and other Africans and people of African descent, to contribute to accountability and redress for victims” December 2020 Introduction 1. INQUEST Charitable Trust is an independent non-governmental organisation which provides expertise on state-related deaths and their investigation to bereaved people, lawyers, advice and support agencies, the media and parliamentarians. Our policy, parliamentary, campaigning and media work is grounded in the day to day experience of working with bereaved people. 2. Our specialist casework with bereaved families focuses on deaths in police and prison custody, immigration detention, mental health settings and deaths involving multi- agency failings or where wider issues of state and corporate accountability are in question, such as Hillsborough and the Grenfell Tower fire. INQUEST works primarily in England and Wales, and advises on a small number of cases in Scotland. We have also shared our expertise on the investigation of state related deaths and the treatment of bereaved people at an international level. 3. Over the past 40 years, INQUEST has advised and assisted countless bereaved families, including many families bereaved by deaths in contact with the police. As a result, we have a unique overview of the investigatory processes, the treatment of bereaved people and the issues arising from these deaths. We have worked consistently to strengthen the institutional framework for accountability for deaths in all forms of state detention and how this works in pursuit of goals of truth, justice and accountability for bereaved families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Investigation and Prosecution of Potentially Unlawful Death a Practitioners' Guide
    7 The Investigation and Prosecution of Potentially Unlawful Death A Practitioners’ Guide Migration and International Human Rights Law 14 Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952 and active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realization of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession. ® The Investigation and Prosecution of Potentially Unlawful Death - A Practitioners’ Guide © Copyright International Commission of Jurists, June 2019 The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) permits free reproduction of extracts from any of its publications provided that due acknowledgment is given and a copy of the publication carrying the extract is sent to its headquarters at the following address: International Commission of Jurists P.O. Box 91 Rue des Bains 33 Geneva Switzerland With the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland The Investigation and Prosecution of Potentially Unlawful Death Practitioners’ Guide No. 14 Acknowledgments This Practitioners Guide was researched and written by Stuart Casey-Maslen, Honorary Professor, Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, with assistance from ICJ Senior Legal Adviser and Coordinator of the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative Kings ley Abbott, both of whom were involved in the drafting of the Minnesota Protocol on the Inv estigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016) , which lies at the heart of this Guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict, Economic Closure and Conflict in Gaza
    org-human-security-gaza-final.qxd 03/10/2007 16:22 Page 1 OxfordResearchGroup building bridges for global security CONFLICT, ECONOMIC CLOSURE AND HUMAN SECURITY IN GAZA Justin Alexander BRIEFING PAPER OCTOBER 2007 org-human-security-gaza-final.qxd 03/10/2007 16:22 Page 2 Published by Oxford Research Group, October 2007. Oxford Research Group Development House 56-64 Leonard Street London EC2A 4LT United Kingdom Copyright © Oxford Research Group, 2007. Some rights reserved. This paper is licensed under a Creative Commons licence that allows copy and distribution for non-profit use, provided the author and ORG are attributed properly and the work is not altered in any way. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for full details. Please contact Oxford Research Group if you would like to translate this report. About the Author Justin Alexander has been working with Oxford Research Group as a Middle East analyst on their “Inclusive Approaches to the Arab-Israeli Conflict” project. In 2005-06 he served with the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI), supporting the process of drafting the Iraqi Constitution and reconciliation initiatives, including organising a study tour in South Africa for senior Iraqi parliamentarians. He is currently the principal consultant for Fertile Crescent Consulting, working on conflict resolution and development in the Middle East and beyond. Acknowledgements Oxford Research Group (ORG) gratefully acknowledges the support of the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Polden-Puckham Charitable Foundation, the Allan and Nesta Ferguson Charitable Trust and the EU Partnerships for Peace Programme, as well as our many supporters and sustainers, for making the publication of this report possible.
    [Show full text]