DOCSLIB.ORG

This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. FAULT-BASED AND STRICT LIABILITY IN THE LAW OF NEIGHBOURS MARÍA PAZ GATICA RODRÍGUEZ Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2017 Abstract By the end of the twentieth century, and after a long line of conflicting case law, the question about the basis of liability in nuisance was settled: in Scotland, damages are awarded only upon proof of fault (RHM Bakeries (Scotland) Ltd v Strathclyde Regional Council 1985 SC (HL) 17). Fault, in turn, can adopt many forms: malice, intention, recklessness, negligence, and conduct causing a special risk of abnormal damage (Kennedy v Glenbelle Ltd 1995 SC 95). Many aspects of this seemingly clear picture, however, remain problematic. On the one hand, the way in which this model is interpreted and applied gives place to particular forms of liability that can actually be characterised as strict. On the other hand, two other areas of the law of neighbours that overlap with the scope of nuisance do not fit entirely this model, namely the regulation of disputes over uses of water and of those arising from withdrawal of support. The main argument of this thesis is that damages claims in the context of neighbourhood are governed by two distinct rules: a general fault-based liability rule for nuisance, and an exceptional strict liability rule for abnormally dangerous conduct. For the first of these rules, the thesis offers an evaluation of the fault model adopted in Kennedy v Glenbelle Ltd, explaining the interaction between its different elements and highlighting the developments that can result in forms of strict liability. For the second of these rules, the thesis develops an analysis of its elements and nature, as well as a proposal that delineates its scope of application. This two-rule model offers a justification for the current structure of the law applicable to disputes over uses of water. The strict liability rule applicable to interferences with the natural flow of watercourses, traditionally explained as based upon the infringement of property rights, is better explained as danger-based. The regulation of disputes arising from withdrawal of support, however, is not consistent with this model, even though they have also been characterised as nuisances. It is argued that this framework entails unjustified inconsistencies, both internal and by reference to the model proposed, and that it should be adjusted accordingly. i Lay Summary In Scots law, there was a longstanding discussion about whether a person, in order to obtain compensation for harm caused by his neighbour’s use of property, required only to demonstrate that the latter caused the harm (strict liability) or, additionally, that he acted with fault, that is, that he was negligent – i.e. not careful enough – or acted with the intention to harm (fault-based liability). But by the end of the twentieth century, this discussion was resolved: the House of Lords established that fault was indeed required, and the Inner House further clarified that fault could adopt many different forms, namely malice, intention to harm, recklessness, negligence and engaging in particularly dangerous activities. Many aspects of this seemingly clear picture, however, are still problematic. On the one hand, this fault-based liability rule is sometimes applied or interpreted in a way in which the actual result is closer to a strict liability rule. On the other hand, some particular types of conflicts between neighbours are not fully subject to the fault-based rule: disputes over uses of shared natural water (like a river) and those arising from withdrawal of the physical support that lands or buildings provide to each other are subject to dual systems, where in some cases a fault-based rule is applied and in others a strict rule is applied. The main argument of this thesis is that neighbour disputes in general are actually subject to two different rules: one fault-based that is applied broadly to all disputes, and one strict that is applied only to particularly dangerous activities. The thesis explains and analyses the nature, elements and scope of both of these rules, highlighting all their problematic aspects. This model serves also to explain the way in which the law deals with conflicts over uses of water: the dual system for water also operates a distinction on the basis of danger, even though this is not the traditional explanation. The disputes about support, however, are treated differently by the law: the dual system is not based on danger, but on other elements. The thesis argues that this is not justified and that these rules should be adjusted in order to fit the proposed model. ii Declaration According to the Postgraduate Assessment Regulations for Research Degrees, Regulation 25, I hereby declare that (a) this thesis has been composed by me; (b) this work is my own; and (c) this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. María Paz Gatica Rodríguez Edinburgh, 8 May 2017. iii iv Acknowledgements I was lucky enough to count on wonderful people, both here and back home, that helped me survive and succeed in this enterprise of writing a thesis in a never-ending winter. So here are my acknowledgements to all those people who trusted, supported and accompanied me throughout these years. First and foremost, thanks to my family. I will be eternally grateful for their support, especially my parents’. They adjusted their lives to my needs, funded the most wonderful holidays, brought me home when I needed to, and a long etcetera. Then there are the two people that actually made this thesis possible: my supervisors, Prof Elspeth Reid and Scott Wortley. Without their knowledge, commitment, encouragement and endless support, I could not have completed this project. Apart from my supervisors, other members of the community at the Edinburgh Law School contributed in various ways to my research. Thanks to Prof Kenneth Reid, Dr Eric Descheemaeker, and Prof George Gretton. Also to Dr Euan MacDonald, who inspired me more than he knows. Thanks as well to my friends from the Scots Law Discussion Group: Alisdair MacPherson, Alasdair Peterson, Lorna MacFarlane, and Po-Yuan Chang. I am especially grateful to the Edinburgh Legal Education Trust for giving me the possibility of visiting many universities abroad and building a network that will be of immense value for my academic life. I am grateful also to my colleagues and friends from Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile, who kept me updated on all the relevant events happening at work and, more importantly, encouraged me and pushed me to finish the PhD and go home. Thanks especially to Isabel Montt, María Agnes Salah, Cristián Banfi, Mauricio Tapia, and Dean Davor Harasic. Last but not least, I would like to thank my friends. To all the ones I left back home, but very especially to Rosario Grez and Pilar Goycoolea, who taught me every day about unconditional friendship and support. To my temporary Chilean “families” here in Edinburgh: María Ignacia Abogabir & José Luis de Marchena, and Libertad Triviño & Jorge Boldt. And to all my Law School colleagues, with whom I shared long hours in the office, nervous breakdowns, joyful submissions, v hopeful goodbyes, and of course, countless pints: Dr Katarzyna Chałaczkiewick- Ładna, Dr Giedre Jokubauskaite, Dr Paolo Sandro, Diogo de Sousa e Alvim, Evgenia Kanellopoulou, Felipe Oliveira de Sousa, Dr David Rosatti, Dr Konstantine Eristavi, Martin Kelly, Nicolás Ojeda, all the (ex) crew from B22, and especially Pablo Grez, who supported me throughout the very intense last months. Yet the biggest thank you goes to my kind and brilliant flatmate, partner in crime, PhD sister and friend Justine Bendel: without her, this would have been simply impossible. I hope we reunite sooner rather than later. To all of you, a huge thank you. This thesis is because of you. This research was conducted thanks to the financial support of Programa de Formación de Capital Humano Avanzado – Becas Chile (CONICYT), agreement Nº 72140231; and of Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile, through their Política de Perfeccionamiento Académico en Chile y el Extranjero. vi Table of Contents Abstract i Lay Summary ii Declaration iii Acknowledgements v Table of Contents vii Table of Cases xi List of Abbreviations xvii Introduction 1 1. Problem and main argument 1 2. Scope 3 3. Methodology 4 4. Structure 4 1 Conceptual Framework 7 1. Introduction 7 2. Fault 8 2.1. Notion and forms of fault 8 2.2. Intention 9 2.3. Negligence 15 2.4. Recklessness 17 3. Strict and “stricter-than-normal” liability 19 3.1. From fault-based to strict liability 19 3.2. Strict liability 20 3.3. Heightened standard of care 24 3.4. Presumption of fault 25 3.5. Res ipsa loquitur 27 4. Chapter conclusions 29 2 Nuisance 31 1. Introduction 31 2. The fault framework adopted in Kennedy v Glenbelle Ltd 33 2.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam
    A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION This page is blank A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM CONTRACT NUMBER TS/MTRIPS/WKS/2017/01 CONTRACT DOCUMENT VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION This page is blank A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification TRANSPORT SCOTLAND THE A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM TS/MTRIPS/WKS/2017/01 CONTRACT DOCUMENT VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT ISSUE RECORD I hereby confirm that this is the current version of the Specification and supersedes all previous issues of such document by the Employer. Signed Name (Block capitals) Date Contractor Copy of signed page shall be sent to, Transport Scotland, [REDACTED] Contract Document i 21 September 201801 November 2018 A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification This page is blank Contract Document ii 21 September 201801 November 2018 A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam Volume 4 - Specification A9 DUALLING: LUNCARTY TO PASS OF BIRNAM VOLUME 4 OF 5 SPECIFICATION CONTENTS Page PREAMBLE TO THE SPECIFICATION ......................................................................................... 1 SCHEDULE OF PAGES AND RELEVANT PUBLICATION DATES OF SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY WORKS ................................................................................ 3 APPENDIX 0/1: CONTRACT-SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL, SUBSTITUTE AND CANCELLED CLAUSES, TABLES AND FIGURES INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT........... 7 APPENDIX 0/2: CONTRACT-SPECIFIC MINOR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING CLAUSES, TABLES AND FIGURES INCLUDED
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Juridical Yearbook, 2001
    Extract from: UNITED NATIONS JURIDICAL YEARBOOK 2001 Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations Chapter VIII. Decisions of national tribunals Copyright (c) United Nations CONTENTS (continued) Page Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating to the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations CHAPTER VII . ED CISIONS AND ADVISORY OPINIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS Arbitration Tribunal constituted by the Government of the French Republic and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to consider the question of the tax regime governing pensions paid to retired UNESCO officials residing in France . 421 CHAPTER viii . DECISIONS OF NATIONAL TRIBUNALS 1. The Netherlands The Hague District Court—Civil Law Division—President Judgement in interlocutory injunction proceedings of 31 August 2001 Plea of Slobodan Milošević for release from detention by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and returned to the territory of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ....................................... 445 2. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (a) High Court of Justiciary—30 March 2001 Opinion of High Court involving the International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons under international law . 450 (b) House of Lords Shanning International Ltd v. Lloyds TSB Bank plc; Lloyds TSB Bank plc v. Rasheed Bank (28 June 2001) An appeal from the Court of Appeal concerning United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait . 491 (c) Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) R (on the application of Othman) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (28 November 2001) Judicial review of decision of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, involving United Nations Security Council sanctions in relation to the situation in Afghanistan and the Taliban .
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 5 November 2019 PAGE 5-0 of CHAPTER 5 CONSULTATION and SCOPING
    CHAPTER 5 CONSULTATIONNovember 2019 AND SCOPING PAGE 5-0 OF CHAPTER 5 Cross Tay Link Road Revision Date Status Author Technical Checker Approver Number Reviewer WORK IN P01.1 04.01.19 E COOPER R FERGUSON R McLEAN D RITCHIE PROGRESS S4 FOR P01 05.11.19 STAGE E COOPER R McLEAN R McLEAN D RITCHIE APPROVAL BIM Number: 119046-SWECO-EGN-000-RP-EN-20006 This document has been prepared on behalf of Perth and Kinross Council by Sweco for the proposed Cross Tay Link Road Project. It is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. Sweco accepts no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. Prepared for: Prepared by: Perth and Kinross Council Sweco Pullar House Suite 4.2, City Park 35 Kinnoull Street 368 Alexandra Parade Perth Glasgow PH1 5GD G31 3AU CONTENTS 5 CONSULTATION AND SCOPING ........................................................................................ 1 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 5.2 Purpose of Consultation ........................................................................................................... 1 5.3 Public Events ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A13.1 Cultural Heritage: Additional Information
    A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam DMRB Stage 3 Environmental Statement Appendix A13.1: Cultural Heritage: Additional Information A13.1 Cultural Heritage: additional information 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This appendix presents additional information in support of Chapter 13 (Cultural Heritage) of the A9 Dualling: Luncarty to Pass of Birnam ES. 1.1.2 The assessment was prepared based on the guidance provided by the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB), Volume 11, Section 3 Part 2 Cultural Heritage (HA 208/07) and the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA) Standard and Guidance for an historic environment desk based assessment (IfA 2012). The results of consultation with the statutory consultees are provided in Chapter 6 of the ES (Consultation and Scoping). 1.1.3 This appendix presents the following information: background information on local cultural heritage; a description and assessment of the full cultural heritage baseline; the assessment of non-significant impacts (Slight or Neutral impacts); and a gazetteer of heritage assets. 1.1.4 The sources of baseline information and methodology for the assessment are identified in Section 13.2 of Chapter 13. 1.1.5 Significant impacts (impacts of Medium or above significance) are detailed in Section 13.4 (Potential Impacts) of Chapter 13. 1.2 Background 1.2.1 The baseline information below is based on the sources identified in Section 13.2 (Cultural Heritage) of the ES. Soils and Geology Superficial Deposits 1.2.2 The British Geological Survey (BGS) geological maps, scale 1:50,000 and 1:10,560, have been consulted to determine the geology of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadet Families
    ROBERTSON OF STRUAN CONAN OF GLENEROCHIE, was a younger son of Henry, Earl of Atholl, and to whom his father assigned the lands of Glenerochie. He made a grant of the woods of these lands to the monks at Coupar Angus in around 1240x45, in which charter he is styled “Conan son of Henry, Earl of Atholl,”1 and granted the dead wood of his lands of Tulyhen to the Abbey of Lindores in 1240x1245.2 He was father of : 1. Ewen of Glenerochie, (see below). 2. A daughter who m. Hath, son of Gilbrid. He is styled “genero” to Conan when witness to a charter by Conan to the Abbey of Lindores.3 EWEN OF GLENEROCHIE, styled as son of Conan when witness to a charter by his father to the Abbey of Lindores in around 1240x1245.4 He granted his lands of Calziebrochan to the Monks of Coupar Angus Abbey in 1282 to be held by them of Ewan and his daughters and their respective husbands as superiors. He m. Muriel, daughter of Conghal, grandson of Malise, Steward of Strathearn, and d. without male issue prior to 1284. Although his daughters were his heirs in certain parts of his lands such as those of Calziebrochan, he was ultimately succeeded in his lands of Glenerochie by the Robertsons of Struan as heirs male. ANDREW DE ATHOLIA, OF GLENEROCHIE, is the first ancestor of the Clan Donnachaidh for whom there is positive proof. He is styled as father to Duncan de Atholia and grandfather to Robert de Atholia in several documents executed in the first half of the 14th century.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Site Address: Land 200M Soutth East of AM Howie Yard File
    Development Description: 5 Site address: Land 200M soutth east of A M Howie Yard File ref: PPA-340-2108 NEW APPEALS CHECKLIST - use for PPA/ CLUD / TWCA cases -see Admin GN 2 for more detailed information on checking new appeals (This checklist should be completed electronically and saved to eRDM as part of the official case record. A hard copy should also be inserted in the physical file) 1. The following documents must be submitted (essential): Fully completed appeal form Full statement of appeal All documents, materials and evidence which the appellant intends to rely on Including a location plan? – if no location plan submitted, include the standard paragraph in the shell letter appellant/agent to request one and tick box once received. 2. Additional documents that might be submitted (desired): Application to planning authority, including all plans/drawings and other documents relevant to the application which is now subject of this appeal Planning authority’s decision notice (if any), which is the subject of this appeal Where application/appeal relates to an earlier consent (e.g. approval of matters specified in conditions; variation of previous conditions), the application, approved plans and decision notice from that earlier consent. The Report of Handling prepared by the planning authority in respect of the application, where one exists 3. Preferred procedure indicated by appellant/agent: Review of all relevant information provided by the appellant and other parties only, with no further procedure Inspection of the land subject of the appeal Further written submissions on specific matters Holding of one or more hearing sessions on specific matters Holding of one or more formal inquiry sessions on specific matters None J139879 -Admin Appeal Checklist – PPA / CLUD / TWCA 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bealtaine in Irish and Scottish Place-Names
    Bealtaine in Irish and Scottish Place-names Kay Muhr Ulster Place-Name Society The term Bealtaine (older spelling Beltine), attested from the Early Irish period, appears in a small number of Irish and Scottish place-names. In Ireland there are possibly ten, most of which are names of townlands in the north (of which two are now obsolete); in the south, there is a townland in Co. Tipperary and one in Co. Cork. In Scotland, Tullybelton PER is the earliest attested of all such names. Bealtaine is used as the name of a time of year, May Day or the month of May. This day was significant both as a quarter day beginning the summer, when young animals increased in value and were taken to their summer grazing, and for the lighting of ceremonial bonfires, the ritual also known as Bealtaine.1 The term Bealtaine was common to the Gaelic-speaking area, including Man,2 while the fire ritual has parallels throughout Europe.3 This paper will study some accounts of what happened during the season of Bealtaine in Ireland and Scotland, and consider the various attempts to explain the origin of the term. This is followed by the history and topography of the place-names containing Bealtaine, in order to compare what is known of the traditions and their development with the origin of the place-names themselves. Bealtaine in the Gaelic year The Early Irish year was divided into four seasons, apparently beginning, not at the equinox or solstice, but between them. All four quarter days, counted from the night before, are mentioned in the Early Irish story of Cú Chulainn’s wooing of his wife Emer.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper, Including Copies of Responses, May Be Made Available in Terms of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002
    NOTES 1. Please note that information about this Discussion Paper, including copies of responses, may be made available in terms of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. Any confidential response will be dealt with in accordance with the 2002 Act. We may also (i) publish responses on our website (either in full or in some other way such as re-formatted or summarised); and (ii) attribute comments and publish a list of respondents' names. 2. Where possible, we would prefer electronic submission of comments. A downloadable electronic response form for this paper as well as a general comments form are available on our website. Alternatively, our general email address is [email protected]. 3. The Discussion Paper is available on our website at http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/ or can be purchased from TSO (http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/). 4. Please note that all hyperlinks in this document were checked for accuracy at the time of final draft. 5. If you have any difficulty in reading this document, please contact us and we will do our best to assist. You may wish to note that the pdf version of this document available on our website has been tagged for accessibility. 6. © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    A COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR USING BOTH RULES AND PREVIOUSLY-DECIDED CASES IN A LEGAL DECISION MAKING PROCESS UCL KAMALENDU PAL Department of Computer Science University College London Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the University of London June 1997 / B Ib L . ( l o n o i k .] UNIV., ProQuest Number: U642047 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U642047 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 A b stra ct A hybrid knowledge-based system, Advisory Support for Home Settlement in Divorce (ASHSD), which exploits both general legal rules (for rule-based reasoning or RBR) and specific information taken from previously-decided similar cases (for case-based reasoning or CBR), is described. Legal knowledge in the system covers three aspects of matrimonial home settlement in divorce in English law, namely owned home settlement, transfer of tenancy, and injunctions to protect a spouse, or a family member in the custody of a spouse. The user can select either reasoning method (RBR or CBR), or indicate no preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Involuntary Manslaughter
    ~ .- ” a .. ,, .rl (I ‘I .. i The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Jack Beatson Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1 N 2BQ. This Consultation Paper, completed for publication on 25 February 1994, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on this Consultation Paper before 31 October 1994. All correspondence should be addressed to: Ms C Haslet1 Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1 N 2BQ Tel: 071-41 1 1214 Fax: 071-41 1 1297 It may be helpful for the Law Commission, either in discussion with others concerned or I in any subsequent recommendations, to be able to refer to and attribute comments submitted in response to this Consultation Paper. Any request to treat all, or part, of a response in confidence will, of course, be respected, but if no such request is made the Law Commission will assume that the response is not intended to be confidential. ! i i i. ~__ The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 135 Criminal Law Involuntary Manslaughter A Consultation Paper, HMSO 0 Crown copyright 1994 Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO ISBN 0 1 I 7302 19 8 17-122-01 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page PART I: SCOPE AND BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT A.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Office Perth Directory
    3- -6 3* ^ 3- ^<<;i'-X;"v>P ^ 3- - « ^ ^ 3- ^ ^ 3- ^ 3* -6 3* ^ I PERTHSHIRE COLLECTION 1 3- -e 3- -i 3- including I 3* ^ I KINROSS-SHIRE | 3» ^ 3- ^ I These books form part of a local collection | 3. permanently available in the Perthshire % 3' Room. They are not available for home ^ 3* •6 3* reading. In some cases extra copies are •& f available in the lending stock of the •& 3* •& I Perth and Kinross District Libraries. | 3- •* 3- ^ 3^ •* 3- -g Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://www.archive.org/details/postofficeperthd1878prin THE POST OFFICE PERTH DIRECTORY FOR 1878 AND OTHER USEFUL INFORMATION. COMPILED AND ARRANGED BY JAMES MARSHALL, POST OFFICE. WITH ^ Jleto ^lan of the Citg ant) i^nbixons, ENGRAVED EXPRESSLY FOR THE WORK. PERTH: PRINTED FOR THE PUBLISHER BY LEITCH & LESLIE. PRICE THREE SHILLINGS. I §ooksz\ltmrW'Xmm-MBy & Stationers, | ^D, SILVER, COLOUR, & HERALDIC STAMPERS, Ko. 23 Qeorqe $treet, Pepjh. An extensive Stock of BOOKS IN GENERAL LITERATURE ALWAYS KEPT IN STOCK, THE LIBRARY receives special attention, and. the Works of interest in History, Religion, Travels, Biography, and Fiction, are freely circulated. STATIONEEY of the best Englisli Mannfactura.. "We would direct particular notice to the ENGRAVING, DIE -SINKING, &c., Which are carried on within the Previises. A Large and Choice Selection of BKITISK and FOEEIGU TAEOT GOODS always on hand. gesigns 0f JEonogntm^, Ac, free nf rhitrge. ENGLISH AND FOREIGN NE^A^SPAPERS AND MAGAZINES SUPPLIED REGULARLY TO ORDER. 23 GEORGE STREET, PERTH. ... ... CONTENTS. Pag-e 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (SECOND ARTICLE). by DAVID MARSHALL, F.S.A
    4 41 PROCEEDING SOCIETYE , 18998 TH Y F . O SMA , I. E EECORNOTETH N O DSE CIT ROOTH Y F MO O F PERTH (SECOND ARTICLE). By DAVID MARSHALL, F.S.A. SCOT. e Sessio th e honou th f n 1895-9I o nd o submi t r ha o thit I 6t s Societ yseriea f e contentNoteso th e Recor n th s o f o s d Roo mf Pertho , which I had been employed by the Magistrates in arranging. I then stated that there was still a remnant of the papers untouched, which it was hoped might, in the near future, be overtaken. After giving in a report, at the request of Lord Provost Dewar, of what more I thought shoul s recallee doneb dwa I o complet,t d e arrangementth e t i d an , seems desirable tha furthea t r notice given e shoulb w .dno It was my misfortune to underrate the extent of the work involved in the second undertaking, and the time which had to be spent in free- inpapere gth s fro e extraneoumth s matters among which the chiefly yla y upon the floor of one of the attics, every movement of the pile raising cloua f dustdo , whic e firsth htf o affected en lungsy e m d tha th o s ,t a t month I thought it would be necessary to give it up; but after a few days' res I returnet it again to d , and, after month laboursof ablewas , to restore many valuable documents to the principal Eecord Room, from which they had from time to time been ruthlessly torn.
    [Show full text]