DOCSLIB.ORG

New Handbook for Standardised Measurement of Plant Functional Traits Worldwide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Botany http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT12225 New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide N. Pérez-Harguindeguy A,Y, S. Díaz A, E. Garnier B, S. Lavorel C, H. Poorter D, P. Jaureguiberry A, M. S. Bret-Harte E, W. K. CornwellF, J. M. CraineG, D. E. Gurvich A, C. Urcelay A, E. J. VeneklaasH, P. B. ReichI, L. PoorterJ, I. J. WrightK, P. RayL, L. Enrico A, J. G. PausasM, A. C. de VosF, N. BuchmannN, G. Funes A, F. Quétier A,C, J. G. HodgsonO, K. ThompsonP, H. D. MorganQ, H. ter SteegeR, M. G. A. van der HeijdenS, L. SackT, B. BlonderU, P. PoschlodV, M. V. Vaieretti A, G. Conti A, A. C. StaverW, S. AquinoX and J. H. C. CornelissenF AInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (CONICET-UNC) and FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CC 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina. BCNRS, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (UMR 5175), 1919, Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. CLaboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, UMR 5553 du CNRS, Université Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. DPlant Sciences (IBG2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany. EInstitute of Arctic Biology, 311 Irving I, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. FSystems Ecology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Department of Ecological Science, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. GDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhtattan, KS 66506, USA. HFaculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. IDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 1530 N Cleveland Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. JCentre for Ecosystems, Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands. KDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. LDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. MCentro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CIDE-CSIC), IVIA Campus, Carretera Nàquera km 4.5, 46113 Montcada, Valencia, Spain. NInstitute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 2, LFW C56, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland. OPeak Science and Environment, Station House, Leadmill, Hathersage, Hope Valley S32 1BA, UK. PDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. QNSW Department of Primary Industries, Forest Resources Research Beecroft, NSW 2119, Australia. RNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, and Institute of Environmental Biology, Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. SEcological Farming Systems, Agroscope Reckenholz Tänikon, Research Station ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland and Plant-Microbe Interactions, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. TDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA. UDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. VInstitute of Botany, Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine, University of Regensburg, D-93040, Regensburg, Germany. WDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. XCentro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, CATIE 7170, Cartago, Turrialba 30501, Costa Rica. YCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2013 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ajb B Australian Journal of Botany N. Pérez-Harguindeguy et al. Abstract. Plant functional traits are the features (morphological, physiological, phenological) that represent ecological strategies and determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels and influence ecosystem properties. Variation in plant functional traits, and trait syndromes, has proven useful for tackling many important ecological questions at a range of scales, giving rise to a demand for standardised ways to measure ecologically meaningful plant traits. This line of research has been among the most fruitful avenues for understanding ecological and evolutionary patterns and processes. It also has the potential both to build a predictive set of local, regional and global relationships between plants and environment and to quantify a wide range of natural and human-driven processes, including changes in biodiversity, the impacts of species invasions, alterations in biogeochemical processes and vegetation–atmosphere interactions. The importance of these topics dictates the urgent need for more and better data, and increases the value of standardised protocols for quantifying trait variation of different species, in particular for traits with power to predict plant- and ecosystem- level processes, and for traits that can be measured relatively easily. Updated and expanded from the widely used previous version, this handbook retains the focus on clearly presented, widely applicable, step-by-step recipes, with a minimum of text on theory, and not only includes updated methods for the traits previously covered, but also introduces many new protocols for further traits. This new handbook has a better balance between whole-plant traits, leaf traits, root and stem traits and regenerative traits, and puts particular emphasis on traits important for predicting species’ effects on key ecosystem properties. We hope this new handbook becomes a standard companion in local and global efforts to learn about the responses and impacts of different plant species with respect to environmental changes in the present, past and future. Additional keywords: biodiversity, ecophysiology, ecosystem dynamics, ecosystem functions, environmental change, plant morphology. Received 23 November 2011, accepted 29 January 2013, published online 26 April 2013 Contents 3.9 Vein density ........................................................ AE 3.10 Light-saturated photosynthetic rate ...................AF Introduction and discussion ............................................C 3.11 Leaf dark respiration .........................................AF 1 Selection of species and individuals .........................D 3.12 Photosynthetic pathway ....................................AG 1.1 Selection of species................................................D 3.13 C-isotope composition as a measure of intrinsic 1.2 Selection of individuals within a species............... E water-use efficiency ..........................................AH 1.3 Replicate measurements......................................... F 3.14 Electrolyte leakage as an indicator of frost 2 Whole-plant traits...................................................... F sensitivity ........................................................... AI 2.1 Life history and maximum plant lifespan.............. F 3.15 Leaf water potential as a measure of water 2.2 Life form................................................................G status .................................................................. AJ 2.3 Growth form ..........................................................G 3.16 Leaf palatability as indicated by preference by 2.4 Plant height ............................................................. I model herbivores...............................................AK 2.5 Clonality, bud banks and below-ground storage 3.17 Litter decomposability ..................................... AM organs...................................................................... J 4 Stem traits ..............................................................AO 2.6 Spinescence............................................................K 4.1 Stem-specific density ..........................................AO 2.7 Branching architecture ........................................... L 4.2 Twig dry-matter content and twig drying time...AQ 2.8 Leaf area : sapwood area ratio ................................ L 4.3 Bark thickness (and bark quality) .......................AQ 2.9 Root-mass fraction................................................ M 4.4 Xylem conductivity............................................. AR 2.10 Salt resistance...................................................... M 4.5 Vulnerability to embolism ...................................AS 2.11 Relative growth rate and its components.............O 5 Below-ground traits ............................................... AT 2.12 Plant flammability................................................ P 5.1 Specific root length ............................................. AT 2.13 Water-flux traits ...................................................R 5.2 Root-system morphology....................................AV 3 Leaf traits .................................................................. T 5.3 Nutrient-uptake strategy......................................AV 3.1 Specific leaf area.................................................... T 6 Regenerative traits ................................................AW 3.2 Area of a leaf ........................................................W 6.1 Dispersal syndrome............................................AW 3.3 Leaf dry-matter content..........................................X 6.2 Dispersule
Recommended publications
  • The Prosopis Juliflora - Prosopis Pallida Complex: a Monograph

    The Prosopis Juliflora - Prosopis Pallida Complex: a Monograph

    DFID DFID Natural Resources Systems Programme The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph NM Pasiecznik With contributions from P Felker, PJC Harris, LN Harsh, G Cruz JC Tewari, K Cadoret and LJ Maldonado HDRA - the organic organisation The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph NM Pasiecznik With contributions from P Felker, PJC Harris, LN Harsh, G Cruz JC Tewari, K Cadoret and LJ Maldonado HDRA Coventry UK 2001 organic organisation i The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph Correct citation Pasiecznik, N.M., Felker, P., Harris, P.J.C., Harsh, L.N., Cruz, G., Tewari, J.C., Cadoret, K. and Maldonado, L.J. (2001) The Prosopis juliflora - Prosopis pallida Complex: A Monograph. HDRA, Coventry, UK. pp.172. ISBN: 0 905343 30 1 Associated publications Cadoret, K., Pasiecznik, N.M. and Harris, P.J.C. (2000) The Genus Prosopis: A Reference Database (Version 1.0): CD ROM. HDRA, Coventry, UK. ISBN 0 905343 28 X. Tewari, J.C., Harris, P.J.C, Harsh, L.N., Cadoret, K. and Pasiecznik, N.M. (2000) Managing Prosopis juliflora (Vilayati babul): A Technical Manual. CAZRI, Jodhpur, India and HDRA, Coventry, UK. 96p. ISBN 0 905343 27 1. This publication is an output from a research project funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. (R7295) Forestry Research Programme. Copies of this, and associated publications are available free to people and organisations in countries eligible for UK aid, and at cost price to others. Copyright restrictions exist on the reproduction of all or part of the monograph.
  • Seed Germination and Early Seedling Survival of the Invasive Species Prosopis Juliflora (Fabaceae) Depend on Habitat and Seed Dispersal Mode in the Caatinga Dry Forest

    Seed Germination and Early Seedling Survival of the Invasive Species Prosopis Juliflora (Fabaceae) Depend on Habitat and Seed Dispersal Mode in the Caatinga Dry Forest

    Seed germination and early seedling survival of the invasive species Prosopis juliflora (Fabaceae) depend on habitat and seed dispersal mode in the Caatinga dry forest Clóvis Eduardo de Souza Nascimento1,2, Carlos Alberto Domingues da Silva3,4, Inara Roberta Leal5, Wagner de Souza Tavares6, José Eduardo Serrão7, José Cola Zanuncio8 and Marcelo Tabarelli5 1 Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brasil 2 Departamento de Ciências Humanas, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Juazeiro, Bahia, Brasil 3 Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Algodão, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil 4 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brasil 5 Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil 6 Asia Pacific Resources International Holdings Ltd. (APRIL), PT. Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper (RAPP), Pangkalan Kerinci, Riau, Indonesia 7 Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil 8 Departamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil ABSTRACT Background: Biological invasion is one of the main threats to tropical biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Prosopis juliflora (Sw) DC. (Fabales: Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) was introduced in the Caatinga dry forest of Northeast Brazil at early 1940s and successfully spread across the region. As other invasive species, it may benefit from the soils and seed dispersal by livestock. Here we examine how seed Submitted 22 November 2018 Accepted 5 July 2020 dispersal ecology and soil conditions collectively affect seed germination, early Published 3 September 2020 seedling performance and consequently the P.
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With

    Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
  • Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    --------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards.
  • Exploring Patterns of Variation Within the Central-European Tephroseris Longifolia Agg.: Karyological and Morphological Study

    Exploring Patterns of Variation Within the Central-European Tephroseris Longifolia Agg.: Karyological and Morphological Study

    Preslia 87: 163–194, 2015 163 Exploring patterns of variation within the central-European Tephroseris longifolia agg.: karyological and morphological study Karyologická a morfologická variabilita v rámci Tephroseris longifolia agg. Katarína O l š a v s k á1, Barbora Šingliarová1, Judita K o c h j a r o v á1,3, Zuzana Labdíková2,IvetaŠkodová1, Katarína H e g e d ü š o v á1 &MonikaJanišová1 1Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84523 Bratislava, Slovakia, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Matej Bel, Tajovského 40, SK-97401 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia; 3Comenius University, Bratislava, Botanical Garden – detached unit, SK-03815 Blatnica, Slovakia Olšavská K., Šingliarová B., Kochjarová J., LabdíkováZ.,ŠkodováI.,HegedüšováK.&JanišováM. (2015): Exploring patterns of variation within the central-European Tephroseris longifolia agg.: karyological and morphological study. – Preslia 87: 163–194. Tephroseris longifolia agg. is an intricate complex of perennial outcrossing herbaceous plants. Recently, five subspecies with rather separate distributions and different geographic patterns were assigned to the aggregate: T. longifolia subsp. longifolia, subsp. pseudocrispa and subsp. gaudinii predominate in the Eastern Alps; the distribution of subsp. brachychaeta is confined to the northern and central Apennines and subsp. moravica is endemic in the Western Carpathians. Carpathian taxon T. l. subsp. moravica is known only from nine localities in Slovakia and the Czech Republic and is treated as an endangered taxon of European importance (according to Natura 2000 network). As the taxonomy of this aggregate is not comprehensively elaborated the aim of this study was to detect variability within the Tephroseris longifolia agg.
  • Askdoctorbonsai-Book Sm.Pdf

    Askdoctorbonsai-Book Sm.Pdf

    COLD WEATHER VARIETIES Contents Can not be grown indoors - Outside spring through late fall (25 degrees) - Cold location in winter (below 50 degrees) 2 What is Bonsai? 7 Basic Bonsai Care 11 Indoor Trees Non-deciduous Deciduous: 11 Light ! Andromeda ! Beech 12 Humidity ! Atlas Cedar ! Birch ! Blue Moss Cypress ! Crabapples 12 Ventilation ! Cryptomeria ! Elms 13 Temperate trees ! Eastern Hemlock, ! Hornbeams 16 Cold Weather trees ! Hinoki Cypress ! Larch 20 Fertilizing ! Pines, all varieties ! Linden 21 Soils ! ! Rhododendrons Japanese Maples 23 Repotting ! Spruce, all varieties ! Native Maples 28 Pruning, Shaping & Styling ! Yews ! Pears 29 Maintenance pruning ! Privet ! Prunus species 30 Pruning to style ! English Holly ! Hawthorn ! Procumbens Juniper ! Wisteria 31 Wiring ! San Jose Juniper ! Ginkgo 32 Insect Control ! Rocky Mountain Juniper 34 Moss 35 Vacation care 35 Your Bonsai Through the Year 38 Categories of Bonsai 40 What is a Bonsai? TEMPERATE Q Outdoors in summer and fall - Can stay out late into fall (25 degrees) - Cool location for winter The exact origins of Bonsai are difficult to determine, but it is A generally believed that the art form began in China, and from there spread to Japan. Trees from the wild were collected from cliff faces and rocky ledges, ! ! trees that had naturally been growing in limited amounts of soil. A tree Adelyensis Cypress Western Hemlock grows differently under such adverse conditions: it grows more slowly, it ! Azalea ! Ilex Pagoda develops definite bark character, smaller foliage, windswept branches, a rugged aged appearance. A small Bonsai pot imitates those adverse natural ! Bald Cypress ! Japanese Yew conditions. ! Boxwoods ! Procumbens Juniper In simplest terms, a Bonsai is a tree, shrub, tropical plant, grass, or herb, grown in a small container and shaped to recreate the look of an older tree ! Catlin Elm ! Pyracantha in nature.
  • Alpine Flora

    Alpine Flora

    ALPINE FLORA -- PLACER GULCH Scientific and common names mostly conform to those given by John Kartesz at bonap.net/TDC FERNS & FERN ALLIES CYSTOPTERIDACEAE -- Bladder Fern Family Cystopteris fragilis Brittle Bladder Fern delicate feathery fronds hiding next to rocks and cliffs PTERIDACEAE -- Maidenhair Fern Family Cryptogramma acrostichoides American Rockbrake two different types of fronds; talus & rocky areas GYMNOSPERMS PINACEAE -- Pine Family Picea englemannii Englemann's Spruce ANGIOSPERMS -- MONOCOTS CYPERACEAE -- Sedge Family Carex haydeniana Hayden's Sedge very common alpine sedge; compact, dark, almost triangular inflorescence Eriophorum chamissonis Chamisso's Cotton-Grass Cottony head; no leaves on culm ALLIACEAE -- Onion Family Allium geyeri Geyer's Onion pinkish; onion smell LILIACEAE -- Lily Family Llyodia serotina Alp Lily white; small plant in alpine turf MELANTHIACEAE -- False Hellebore Family Anticlea elegans False Deathcamas greenish white; showy raceme above basal grass-like leaves Veratrum californicum Cornhusk Lily; CA False Hellebore greenish; huge lvs; huge plant; mostly subalpine ORCHIDACEAE -- Orchid Family Plantanthera aquilonis Green Bog Orchid greenish, in bracteate spike, spur about as long as or a bit shorter than lip POACEAE -- Grass Family Deschampsia caespitosa Tufted Hair Grass open inflorescence; thin, wiry leaves; 2 florets/spikelet; glumes longer than low floret Festuca brachyphylla ssp. coloradoensis Short-leaf Fescue dark; narrow inflorescence; thin, wiry leaves Phleum alpinum Mountain Timothy dark;
  • Unearthing Belowground Bud Banks in Fire-Prone Ecosystems

    Unearthing Belowground Bud Banks in Fire-Prone Ecosystems

    Unearthing belowground bud banks in fire-prone ecosystems 1 2 3 Author for correspondence: Juli G. Pausas , Byron B. Lamont , Susana Paula , Beatriz Appezzato-da- Juli G. Pausas 4 5 Glo'ria and Alessandra Fidelis Tel: +34 963 424124 1CIDE-CSIC, C. Naquera Km 4.5, Montcada, Valencia 46113, Spain; 2Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin Email [email protected] University, PO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; 3ICAEV, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Isla Teja, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile; 4Depto Ci^encias Biologicas,' Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av P'adua Dias 11., CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; 5Instituto de Bioci^encias, Vegetation Ecology Lab, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Av. 24-A 1515, 13506-900 Rio Claro, Brazil Summary To be published in New Phytologist (2018) Despite long-time awareness of the importance of the location of buds in plant biology, research doi: 10.1111/nph.14982 on belowground bud banks has been scant. Terms such as lignotuber, xylopodium and sobole, all referring to belowground bud-bearing structures, are used inconsistently in the literature. Key words: bud bank, fire-prone ecosystems, Because soil efficiently insulates meristems from the heat of fire, concealing buds below ground lignotuber, resprouting, rhizome, xylopodium. provides fitness benefits in fire-prone ecosystems. Thus, in these ecosystems, there is a remarkable diversity of bud-bearing structures. There are at least six locations where belowground buds are stored: roots, root crown, rhizomes, woody burls, fleshy
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2

    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
  • Training and Pruning of Apple and Modern Trends of Development - an Overview

    Training and Pruning of Apple and Modern Trends of Development - an Overview

    Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue: 1, 2014 TÜRK TURKISH TARIM ve DOĞA BİLİMLERİ JOURNAL of AGRICULTURAL DERGİSİ and NATURAL SCIENCES www.turkjans.com Training and Pruning of Apple and Modern Trends of Development - An Overview Stefan GANDEV , Vasiliy DZHUVINOV Fruit Growig Institute, Plovdiv, Bulgaria *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Since Second stage of intensification of apple industry in Europe started during early of 1970`s with Dutch `Slender spindle` training system for high density plantations. Other systems such as `Verical axis', V and Y- shaped system,`Tatura trellis`,`Solen`, `Solax`, `Cone` etc. were developed in different countries of the world. Planting systems were classified at five group as low to ultra high density, that is since less 1000 to more than 8000 trees per hectare. According to studies in France during the last 40 years, apple tree cultivars have been classified in four group depend of their fruiting type - I type Starkrimson, II- Reine des Reinettes, III-Golden Delicious and IV-Granny Smith. This classification give us the answer why we have biennial bearing for the apple cultivars in type I and regular bearing for type IV, and why is very important to maintain good balance between vegetative growth and reproductive shoots as a part of apple canopy architecture. Keywords: Malus domestica (Borkh), training and pruning systems, fruiting type and habit Introduction - an annual production and better quality fruit The evolution of apple industry in different which requires a balance between fruiting and countries from 1950 to 1970, apple training (goblets, vegetation vigour. structured hedgerow) and pruning have resulted in good High yield performance of fruit crops results fruit production in terms of yield and fruit quality.
  • The Cost of Protection: Frost Avoidance and Competition in Herbaceous Plants

    The Cost of Protection: Frost Avoidance and Competition in Herbaceous Plants

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-26-2019 10:30 AM The Cost of Protection: Frost Avoidance and Competition in Herbaceous Plants Frederick Curtis Lubbe The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Henry, Hugh A. L. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Frederick Curtis Lubbe 2019 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Biology Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Lubbe, Frederick Curtis, "The Cost of Protection: Frost Avoidance and Competition in Herbaceous Plants" (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6398. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6398 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Perennial herbaceous plants in regions that experience winter freezing must survive using belowground structures that can tolerate or avoid frost stress. Soil and plant litter can insulate plant structures from frost exposure, but plants must invest into growth to penetrate through these layers to reach the surface in the spring. The overall goal of my thesis was to test the hypothesis that the protection of overwintering clonal structures by soil or plant litter (frost avoidance) comes at the expense of subsequent reduced growth and competitive ability in absence of freezing stress. I first explored this trade-off with a suite of experiments using plants with bulbs and stem tubers - storage-focused organs that are typically located below the soil surface.
  • Fern News 64

    Fern News 64

    ASSOCIATION Of W2?» M 64 ISSN 0811-5311 DATE— MARCH 1994 6,-0.2}- ****************************************************************** LEADER: Peter Hind, 41 Miller Street, Mount Druitt, 2770 SECRETARY: Moreen Woollett, 3 Currawang Place, Como West, 2226 TREASURER: Joan Moore, 2 Gannet Street, Gladesville, 2111 SPORE BANK: Dulcie Buddee, 4 Leigh Street, Merrylands, 2160 ****************************************************************** 9:5gBN75gRVE¥70F7EQBDeHBNEilStANDeeeeeiw Contributed by Calder Chaffey In November 1993 eight of us SGAPpers. seven also belonging to the Fern Study Group, spent a week (Two of us two weeks) on Lord Howe Island. Ne were Geoff ahd Ann Long, Qllan and Moreen Noollett, Roy and Beatrice Duncan and Calder and Keith Chaffey. Our leader was Ian Hutton who gave us his generous and unstinting help, and the benefit of his enormous knowledge of the flora and fauna of Lord Howe Island. Anyone interested in Lord Howe Island must have a copy of Ian‘s book, ”Lord Howe Island” in which he discusses the natural history flora and fauna of the Island. He also describes most trees, shrubs and Climbers with a key. There is also a fern list. The new edition to appear shortly will describe all discovered ferns as well as other expanded Chapters. His ”Birds of Lord Howe Island Past’and Present" is also a must. Both books are obtainable from him c/o P.O. Box 6367. Coffs Harbour Plaza. New, 2450. Ne sighted and identified specimens of all except two of the 180 native trees, shrubs and climbers, including 57 endemic species. Some of us were especially interested in the ferns. Of the 56 species we found 51 of which 26 were endemic.