Sewing Alliances: Anti-Sweatshop Activism in the

By Dan La Botz

icketers surround a chainstore clothing outlet and hand out leaflets about labor conditions on the Pacific island of P Saipan. A mainline church sponsors a talk on how the world’s largest sneaker companies use Indonesian sweatshop labor. Students at the local college take over a campus building, demanding that the school quit licensing its logo to appear on goods made in sweatshops.

These are just some of the events happening with coherence around strategy, vision, or how to move ever-greater frequency in cities across the United States. forward,” says Lynda Yanz, director of the Toronto- Dozens of overlapping activist networks and hundreds based Maquila Solidarity Network. of groups—some with paid staffing and thousands of supporters—are mobilizing to improve wages and con- Sweatshop History ditions in sweatshops. Most United States anti- United States-based organizing against sweatshops sweatshop groups specialize in one of four areas: gener- dates back to the 1890s, when progressives helped ating mainstream media attention, mobilizing activists garment workers organize legislative campaigns. But 63 nationwide, developing a base in a particular sweatshops remained widespread until workers formed community, or supporting workers at a particular unions and carried out industry-wide strikes. The company or location. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, formed Picking up steam since the early 1990s, the in 1900, and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of movement has pushed the sweatshop issue into the America, founded in 1914, won labor contracts that national consciousness, forcing corporations to adopt dramatically improved wages and working conditions “codes of conduct” for their suppliers, creating organiza- and set up programs for worker healthcare, pensions, tions to monitor compliance with the codes, and and even housing. By mid-century, the two unions and helping workers in at least two overseas sweatshops the Textile Workers Union of America, formed in 1939, forge union contracts. “There have been great represented nearly one million workers. advances,” says Stephen Coats, executive director of the In the 1960s, however, apparel production began -based United States/Labor Education in the relocating from northern cities to the United States Americas Project (US/LEAP). “We are light years ahead South and eventually to Central America, the in terms of the power we can bring to bear on Caribbean, and Asia. Factories in more than 60 nations companies.” now supply the United States market. And, as But the movement has yet to significantly improve unionized factories have closed in the United States, the industry’s wages and labor conditions, either in the shady garment-assembly shops have made a comeback, United States or abroad. The missing ingredients, especially in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. leading activists say, include sweat-free alternatives for More than half of the apparel production in this country consumers, resources for workers to organize industry- now happens in illegal sweatshops, according to the wide, and enforceable laws and international pacts pro- United States Labor Department. tecting worker rights. All told, about 75 percent of clothing sold in this “[Inside] the movement there’s not enough country is made in sweatshops. The typical worker is a

Race, Poverty & the Environment | Spring 2007 Organizing

young woman whose wages leave Mobilizing the Masses her struggling at less than one- Groups focusing on mass mobiliza- third of her country’s official tion constitute the movement’s second poverty level. Her work week pillar. Two based in Washington, may extend to 80 hours or more. D.C.—the Campaign for Labor Her chances of encountering Rights (CLR), founded in 1993, and sexual harassment, pregnancy dis- United Students Against Sweatshops crimination, and safety hazards (USAS), initiated in 1997—have are high. She’d likely be fired for created communication networks to trying to form a union. mobilize supporters in dozens of Mergers among the three locations simultaneously. “We work apparel and textile unions led to on campaigns that support workers the 1995 creation of the Union of when they’re trying to organize sweat- Needletrades, Industrial and shops,” says Daisy Pitkin, CLR’s Textile Employees. Faced with national coordinator. “We become dwindling resources and a membership of just 150,000, involved when a United States retail company is UNITE further merged with the Hotel and involved, because that’s how grassroots activists can get Restauraunt Employees union to form UNITE HERE. a handle. We never work on a campaign alone. We Working as part of the Change to Win coalition, their always work in coalition with other groups.” current campaign focuses on CINTAS, the largest USAS chapters pressure universities across the uniform manufacturing company in the United States. country to keep school names and logos off sweatshop “Taking on the retail industry requires an interna- clothing. “The organization functions like an informa- tional solution,” union organizer Ginny Coughlin says. tion clearinghouse,” says Amber Gallup, who became 64 Toward that end, the United States-based union has the USAS field coordinator after volunteering for the strengthened ties with unions and worker organizations Indiana University chapter. “We have the strategy of in the garment and textile sectors of 10 countries, national, coordinated grassroots action that seems to including , the Dominican Republic, have worked really well in a couple of campaigns. We Guatemala, China, Thailand, and Indonesia. have built student power on campus to leverage our The National Labor Committee did extensive work administrators and then leverage large companies to focusing public attention on sweatshop practices. The make real changes in workers’ lives.” committee captured extensive media coverage with a The third type of anti-sweatshop group focuses on a series of exposés, including a 1996 disclosure that Wal- local base, like churches or K–12 schools. The most Mart clothing marketed under Kathie Lee Gifford’s powerful example is the New York State Labor-Religion name was produced in Honduras by 13-year-old girls Coalition, a network of nine affiliates. Last year, the working 13-hour shifts for 31 cents an hour. When coalition convinced the state legislature and Gov. Gifford cried on TV, the movement was on the national George Pataki to enact a law permitting schools to radar. reject bids from companies for using sweatshop labor. Global Exchange expanded the awareness with The coalition now works with teacher unions and child- high-profile litigation, including a 1999 lawsuit labor activists on a campaign for sweat-free purchasing against United States corporations that held workers in policies in the state’s 740 school districts.

■ virtual slavery on Saipan, the largest island of the The fourth anti-sweatshop pillar—groups focusing United States “commonwealth” known as the on a particular company or location—includes Photo: An immigrant Northern Marianas. Global Exchange backed the suit US/LEAP, Educating for Justice, Sweatshop Watch, worker from India feeds napkins into an ironing with demonstrations and picket lines at Gap stores and STITCH, Make the Road by Walking, and many machine in Oakland, company headquarters in San Francisco. Most of the others. retailers eventually settled, agreeing to pay for inde- The power all four types of groups can wield when © David Bacon pendent monitoring of the plants. coordinated is evident at Mex Mode, a Korean-owned

Race, Poverty & the Environment | Spring 2007 sweatshop in the central Mexican state of Puebla. The commercial monitors that plant, formerly called Kukdong, makes fleece garments come in for two days,” says for Reebok and Nike. When its workers went on strike Yanz, the Maquila Solidarity for union recognition in January 2001, the AFL-CIO’s Network director. office relayed the news to United States anti-sweatshop groups. Coordinating the USAS sent members to investigate the factory and Coalition used its involvement in a factory-monitoring organiza- The movement’s effect tion called the Worker Rights Consortium to pressure on labor conditions ulti- university administrations. “We created listservs and mately depends on greater conference calls and we started coordinating this coordination among anti- campaign together,” Gallup says. “We got 30 schools to sweatshop actors: agreeing send letters to Nike on the same day. Nike was forced on which corporations to by the pressure of these administrators—and the fear of target and which union losing this college market and having its public image organizing to support; affected—to get its manufacturer to recognize an inde- joining forces behind pro- pendent union, and it was forced to keep the produc- worker legislation and treaty proposals; and linking tion there.” local grassroots bases for nationwide responses when CLR, for its part, mobilized religious groups, union workers are fired for organizing. “We’re often behind in locals, and others to visit 40 of Mexico’s 45 consular bringing all of our leverage to bear,” Coats says. “By the offices across the United States last July. Others rallying time people in the north hear about a problem, it’s for the Kukdong workers included Global Exchange, often too late.” US/LEAP, the International Labor Rights Fund, and a A large antisweatshop alliance could convince foun- myriad of local groups in Canada, the United States, dations to devote more money to the movement. A 65 Europe, and Australia. national coordinating center, perhaps modeled after The workers won their first union contract in Canada’s Maquila Solidarity Network, could enable September and another this April. “This is the first unions, NGOs, faith-based groups, and students to time that workers in [Mexico’s] maquiladora zones have develop a coherent strategy and increase the been able to create an independent union,” Gallup says. movement’s political power. Two initiatives appear to be steps in the right direction. The National Labor Corporate Concessions Committee is working on an international effort, the Under pressure from the movement, some apparel Abolish Sweatshops Campaign, modeled after the corporations have agreed to “multi-stakeholder arrange- campaign to abolish land mines. Participants include ments”—standards and enforcement mechanisms set by USAS, the International Labor Rights Fund, the company, consumers, and sometimes workers, local TransAfrica, the United Steel Workers of America, and NGOs, and other groups. The standards cover the labor and NGO leaders in Nicaragua, Honduras, company or a particular assembly plant. Bangladesh, Hong Kong, and Mexico. In El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, the anti- The other promising initiative is called SweatFree sweatshop movement and worker groups have managed Communities, a network for local actions against sweat- ■ to open some factories to independent monitoring to shops. “We’re still growing as a movement—growing Photo: Workers sewing verify whether the nation’s labor laws and United States in both our reach and creativity,” says Larry Weiss, the blue jeans in garment factory in the city of apparel company codes are being followed. The most Resource Center of the Americas organizer. “And we’re Shenzhen, one of effective monitors are local NGOs or plant workers. more connected than ever with workers in the various China's first Special Economic Zones. “Local groups that understand labor rights in the places. I believe we’re close to some changes for apparel community can better understand the situation than workers, both in terms of organizing and conditions.” ■ © 2005 Rob Crandall / The Image Works

Dan La Botz teaches Latin American studies at in Oxford, Ohio. He edits Mexican Labor News and Analysis and is the author of several books on labor. This article is excerpted with permission from Resources Center of the Americas.(www.americas.org).

Race, Poverty & the Environment | Spring 2007 Race,Poverty the A Project of & Environment Urban Habitat a journal for social and environmental justice

First published as a joint project of the Urban Habitat Program and the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, RP&E is now published twice annually by Urban Habitat and is dedicated to exploring the intersection of race, class, and environmental and social justice. Don’t miss any of our passionate, in-depth discussions of important social topics!

Spring 1990  Earth Day Summer 1990  Cultural Diversity Winter 1991  Women of Color Support RP&E: Spring 1991  Pesticides Summer 1991  Energy subscribe today! Winter 1992  The Summit Spring 1992  Asian/Pacific Islanders Summer 1992  Water Fall 1992  Native Nations in 1992 Spring 1993  Urban Problems Summer 1993  Population and Immigration & the Fall 1993  Latinos and the Environment Published by Spring 1994  Military Base Conversion Urban Habitat Program a journal for social and environmental justice Winter 1995  Environmental Justice and the Law Vol. 14 No. 1 | Spring 2007 | $10 Summer 1995  Nuclear Technology & Communities of Color JUST jobs? Fall 1995  Social Justice and Transportation Spring 1996  Multicultural Environmental Education Fall 1996  The Border Winter 2000  A Place at the Table: Food & Environmental Justice Winter 2001  Reclaiming Land and Community: Brownfields & Environmental Justice Summer 2002  Fixin’ to Stay: Anti-Displacement Policy Options & Community Response Summer 2003  Where Do We Go from Here? A Look at the Long Road to Environmental Justice Fall 2003  Governing from the Grassroots: EJ and Electoral Activism Summer 2004  Reclaiming our Resources: Organizing for Economic Justice Imperialism and Environmental Justice Winter 2005  Burden of Proof: Using Research for Environmental Justice Winter 2006  Moving the Movement: Use the form below or order online: Transportation Justice www.urbanhabitat.org/subscribe Summer 2006  Getting Ready for Change: Green Economics and Climate Justice

Yes! I want an annual subscription to Race, Poverty & the Environment. Name: ______Sent free of charge to grassroots groups upon request. Organization: ______$20 (Individuals) $40 (Institutions) Address: ______State: ____ Zip: ______Email: ______Yes! I want to support the advancement of social, economic, A check is enclosed Please charge my Visa/MasterCard and environmental justice in the Bay Area and beyond. Visa/MC Number: ______Exp. Date: _____ I want to support Urban Habitat with a tax-deductible donation of: (Please include the 3-4 digit card verification number found on the back of most credit cards.) $25 $50 $100 $500 $1,000 Other $______Signature: ______

Please make checks payable to Urban Habitat. Mail this form to 436 14th St., #1205, Oakland, CA 94612