Open As a Single Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open As a Single Document arnoUjaarno ~a Volume 53 Number 4 1993 Page . 2 Emerald Metropolis Karl Arnoldia (ISBN 004-2633; USPS 866-100) is Haglund published quarterly by the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. Second-class postage paid at 18 The Waverly Oaks Boston, Massachusetts. Charles S. Sargent are $20.00 per calendar year Subscriptions domestic, 20 Historic Plants in a New $25.00 in advance. are Setting: foreign, payable Single copies The Evolution of the Hunnewell $5.00 All remittances must be in U.S dollars, by Building check drawn on a U.S. bank, or by international Landscape money order. Send orders, remittances, change-of- Stephen A. Spongberg &> Peter Del Tredici address notices, and all other subscription-related communications to: Circulation Manager, Arnoldia, 26 The Asian Connection The Arnold Arboretum, 125 Arborway, Jamaica Plain, Robert E. Cook MA 02130-3519. Telephone 617/524-1718 31 subsessilis Postmaster: Send address changes to: Introducing Weigela Stephen A. Spongberg Arnoldia, Circulation Manager The Arnold Arboretum Chaenomeles x ’Mandarin’ 125 Arborway 34 Superba Jamaica Plain, MA 02130-3519 Gary L. Koller Karen Madsen, Editor 37 Index to Volume 53 Editorial Committee Phyllis Andersen Front cover: Winter at the Arnold Arboretum, Robert E. Cook looking down from Hemlock Hill to Valley Road. Peter Del Tredici This photograph, by David Akiba, appears on the Gary Koller jacket of New England Natives. A Celebration of Richard Schulhof People and Trees written by Sheila Connor, librarian Stephen A. Spongberg of the Arnold Arboretum, and published by Harvard University Press, 1994. Arnoldia is set in Trump Mediaeval typeface and printed by the Office of the University Publisher, Inside front cover: The Hemlock Gorge Reservation, Harvard University. near the juncture of Wellesley, Needham, and . Newton, was acquired by the Boston Metropolitan Copyright © 1994. The President and Fellows of Park Commission (now the Metropolitan District Harvard College Commission) in 1895. From Report of the Board of Metropohtan Park Commissioners, 1896. Back cover: The Arboretum’s thirty-five-foot Linodendron tuhpifera x chinense (a hybrid tulip tree) is moved to its permanent location in the landscape of the Hunnewell Building. Photograph by Peter Del Tredici. Inside back cover: "The Museum," the Hunnewell Building, as designed by Longfellow, Alden & Harlow, Architects, in 1892. Pen-and-ink watercolor by Harry Fenn for "The Tree Museum" by M C. Robbins, which appeared in the April 1893 issue of Century Luiodendron chmense Magazine. Emerald Metropolis Karl Haglund .i One hundred years ago the founders of Boston’s Metropolitan Park Commission realized a transcendentalist vision by reserving as public open space "the rock hills, the stream banks, and the bay and the sea shores" of the region. At the height of the Panic of 1893 Charles port addressed the urban environment, but not Francis Adams and his brother Henry "packed by focusing on the city center as Chicago’s up our troubles and made for Chicago" to see White City had done. Nor did they advocate the World’s Columbian Exposition. Like thou- taking control of suburban development- sands of others they were captivated and aston- street plans and public transportation as well ished by the fantastic ensemble of images they as parks-an approach that Olmsted and oth- saw there-neoclassical buildings, all perfectly ers had unsuccessfully urged in New York City white, arrayed according to Frederick Law in the 1870s. Looking instead to the margins Olmsted’s site plan to display "the successful and the in-between spaces of the region, they grouping in harmonious relationships of vast envisioned an "Emerald Metropolis." More and magnificent structures." Employing the than a city in a park, more than a second Em- talents of America’s best architects, the fair’s erald Necklace, more, even, than a system of "White City" generated enormous enthusiasm parks, it was a visual definition of the region’s for what soon came to be called the City Beau- structure that could be sustained, they were tiful movement.’1 convinced, even in the face of unimagined In his autobiography, Henry Adams puzzled growth. The Emerald Metropolis would help over the exhibits and the architecture of the Bostonians feel at home by preserving what exposition. Given that these extraordinary Eliot called "the rock-hills, the stream banks, white structures had been "artistically in- and the bay and the sea shores" of greater duced to pass the summer on the shore of Lake Boston-the natural edges, paths, and land- Michigan," the question was, did they seem at marks of the region.2 home there? More than that, Adams wondered whether Americans were at home in the fair’s The Idea Defined idealized New World city. But neither of the Eliot and Baxter moved to shape the region by Adamses, in their published works or private reserving as open space large tracts hitherto writings, connected what they saw in Chicago unbuildable but now on the verge of develop- with Charles’ work as chairman of the Metro- ment ; the shores of rivers and beaches still politan Park Commission in Boston. marshy or shabbily built up; and the most pic- In January 1893 the six-month-old park turesque remaining fragments of the aboriginal commission had published its report, written New England landscape. The natural features by Sylvester Baxter and Charles Eliot, the of the region should establish the armature for commission’s secretary and landscape archi- urban development, not the existing haphaz- tect ; Adams wrote the introduction. Their re- ard assemblage of streets, lots, railroads, and 3 By the 1890s the Middlesex Fells was entirely surrounded by rapidly growmg towns whose boundaries met in the middle of the woods. The towns had already begun to purchase land around the ponds to protect their water supply when the reservation was created m 1894, expandmg the protecuon of the watershed. This view looks across Spot Pond toward Pickerel Rock. From Report of the Board of Metropolitan Park Commissioners, 1895. streetcar lines. Once set aside, these reserva- with another sort of open space. He looked out tions would forever enhance the city’s fitness from the State House and saw, within a ten- for human habitation, joining unique and char- mile radius, many still-surviving remnants of acteristic landscapes to the placemaking the New England wilderness. There were half power of the city’s historic landmarks. The a dozen scenes of uncommon beauty, "well park commission’s plan offered the citizenry of known to all lovers of nature near Boston ... Boston an opportunity to see the metropolis in in daily danger of utter destruction." He urged an entirely new way; the figure and ground of the immediate creation of an association to the region’s topographical features would be hold "small and well-distributed parcels of transposed. land ... just as the Public Library holds books Baxter and Eliot had begun formulating and the Art Museum pictures-for the use and these ideas several years earlier. In February enjoyment of the public." Generous men and 1890, Eliot responded to an editorial by women would bequeath these irreplaceable Charles Sprague Sargent in his new periodical properties to such a group, just as others Garden and Forest that since the cities and give works of art to the city’s museums. Eliot towns around Boston had failed to act, the pro- helped organize a standing committee of vision of "well-distributed open spaces" for twenty-five, which set to work in the spring of public squares and playgrounds would have to 1890. As an energetic member of the commit- wait for the establishment of a commission by tee, Baxter drew on his ties to newspaper edi- the legislature. Eliot, however, was concerned tors and writers across the state and to other 4 veterans of the twenty-year-old campaign to Boston appeared, Eliot read it and proposed preserve the Middlesex Fells. The legislation that they work together to realize the metro- to create a privately endowed Trustees of Pub- politan park system. At their urging the newly lic Reservations was signed in May of 1891.3 organized Trustees of Public Reservations Though Eliot did not note the distinction in agreed to convene a meeting of park commis- his letter, the analogy with the art museum sioners from across Greater Boston in Decem- and the public library suggested two ap- ber 1891. After public hearings the following proaches to preserving open space, one private spring, a temporary Metropolitan Park Com- and the other public. Even before the campaign mission was authorized by the legislature in to organize the Trustees was completed, Eliot June 1892.5 and Baxter moved-first separately and then Baxter’s concerns were the administrative jointly-to promote a public regional park au- inefficiencies and parochial jealousies of the thority. Eliot wrote a letter to his boyhood myriad cities and towns in the Boston basin, friend Governor William Russell in December and Eliot knew firsthand how the wariness of 1890, recommending that the State Board of town officials affected the development of pub- Health develop a plan for metropolitan reser- lic open space. From his extensive explorations vations. Three months later, Baxter wrote a on the region’s fringes, he knew that town bound- series of articles in the Boston Herald about aries often bisected the most scenic areas, what he called "Greater Boston." He too especially along ponds and river valleys. It scanned the ten-mile view from the State would be senseless, he said, for one town to act House, but he described an image that was the without the other, but too often one city had very inverse of Eliot’s fast-disappearing land- refused to spend money for fear that the adjoin- scapes.
Recommended publications
  • New Insight Into the Phylogeographic Pattern Of
    New insight into the phylogeographic pattern of Liriodendron chinense (Magnoliaceae) revealed by chloroplast DNA: east–west lineage split and genetic mixture within western subtropical China Aihong Yang, Yongda Zhong, Shujuan Liu, Lipan Liu, Tengyun Liu, Yanqiang Li and Faxin Yu The Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Genetic and Improvement of Jiangxi, Institute of Biological Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China ABSTRACT Background: Subtropical China is a global center of biodiversity and one of the most important refugia worldwide. Mountains play an important role in conserving the genetic resources of species. Liriodendron chinense is a Tertiary relict tree largely endemic to subtropical China. In this study, we aimed to achieve a better understanding of the phylogeographical pattern of L. chinense andtoexploretheroleofmountainsintheconservationofL. chinense genetic resources. Methods: Three chloroplast regions (psbJ-petA, rpl32-ndhF, and trnK5’-matK) were sequenced in 40 populations of L. chinense for phylogeographical analyses. Relationships among chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) haplotypes were determined using median-joining networks, and genetic structure was examined by spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA). The ancestral area of the species was reconstructed using the Bayesian binary Markov Chain Monte Carlo (BBM) method according to its geographic distribution and a maximum parsimony (MP) tree based on Bayesian methods. Results: Obvious phylogeographic structure was found in L. chinense. SAMOVA Submitted 13 September 2018 revealed seven groups matching the major landscape features of the L. chinense Accepted 26 December 2018 Published 1 February 2019 distribution area. The haplotype network showed three clades distributed in the eastern, southwestern, and northwestern regions. Separate northern and southern Corresponding author Faxin Yu, [email protected] refugia were found in the Wu Mountains and Yungui Plateau, with genetic admixture in the Dalou Mountains and Wuling Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Magnoliaceae Liriodendron L. Magnolia L
    THE Magnoliaceae Liriodendron L. Magnolia L. VEGETATIVE KEY TO SPECIES IN CULTIVATION Jan De Langhe (1 October 2014 - 28 May 2015) Vegetative identification key. Introduction: This key is based on vegetative characteristics, and therefore also of use when flowers and fruits are absent. - Use a 10× hand lens to evaluate stipular scars, buds and pubescence in general. - Look at the entire plant. Young specimens, shade, and strong shoots give an atypical view. - Beware of hybridisation, especially with plants raised from seed other than wild origin. Taxa treated in this key: see page 10. Questionable/frequently misapplied names: see page 10. Names referred to synonymy: see page 11. References: - JDL herbarium - living specimens, in various arboreta, botanic gardens and collections - literature: De Meyere, D. - (2001) - Enkele notities omtrent Liriodendron tulipifera, L. chinense en hun hybriden in BDB, p.23-40. Hunt, D. - (1998) - Magnolias and their allies, 304p. Bean, W.J. - (1981) - Magnolia in Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles VOL.2, p.641-675. - or online edition Clarke, D.L. - (1988) - Magnolia in Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles supplement, p.318-332. Grimshaw, J. & Bayton, R. - (2009) - Magnolia in New Trees, p.473-506. RHS - (2014) - Magnolia in The Hillier Manual of Trees & Shrubs, p.206-215. Liu, Y.-H., Zeng, Q.-W., Zhou, R.-Z. & Xing, F.-W. - (2004) - Magnolias of China, 391p. Krüssmann, G. - (1977) - Magnolia in Handbuch der Laubgehölze, VOL.3, p.275-288. Meyer, F.G. - (1977) - Magnoliaceae in Flora of North America, VOL.3: online edition Rehder, A. - (1940) - Magnoliaceae in Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in North America, p.246-253.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Approach
    Toward the ultimate phylogeny of Magnoliaceae: phylogenomic approach Sangtae Kim*1, Suhyeon Park1, and Jongsun Park2 1 Sungshin University, Korea 2 InfoBoss Co., Korea Mr. Carl Ferris Miller Founder of Chollipo Arboretum in Korea Chollipo Arboretum Famous for its magnolia collection 2020. Annual Meeting of Magnolia Society International Cholliop Arboretum in Korea. April 13th~22th, 2020 http://WWW.Chollipo.org Sungshin University, Seoul, Korea Dr. Hans Nooteboom Dr. Liu Yu-Hu Twenty-one years ago... in 1998 The 1st International Symposium on the Family Magnoliaceae, Gwangzhow Dr. Hiroshi Azuma Mr. Richard Figlar Dr. Hans Nooteboom Dr. Qing-wen Zeng Dr. Weibang Sun Handsome young boy Dr. Yong-kang Sima Dr. Yu-wu Law Presented ITS study on Magnoliaceae - never published Ten years ago... in 2009 Presented nine cp genome region study (9.2 kbp) on Magnoliaceae – published in 2013 2015 1st International Sympodium on Neotropical Magnoliaceae Gadalajara, 2019 3rd International Sympodium and Workshop on Neotropical Magnoliaceae Asterales Dipsacales Apiales Why magnolia study is Aquifoliales Campanulids (Euasterids II) Garryales Gentianales Laminales Solanales Lamiids important in botany? Ericales Asterids (Euasterids I) Cornales Sapindales Malvales Brassicales Malvids Fagales (Eurosids II) • As a member of early-diverging Cucurbitales Rosales Fabales Zygophyllales Celestrales Fabids (Eurosid I) angiosperms, reconstruction of the Oxalidales Malpighiales Vitales Geraniales Myrtales Rosids phylogeny of Magnoliaceae will Saxifragales Caryphyllales
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Genetic Structure Based on Geographic Populations of the Endangered Tree Species: Liriodendron Chinense
    Article Study on the Genetic Structure Based on Geographic Populations of the Endangered Tree Species: Liriodendron chinense Peng-Yan Zhou 1,† , Li-Xing Hui 1,†, Shu-Jing Huang 1, Zhou-Xian Ni 1 , Fa-Xin Yu 2 and Li-An Xu 1,* 1 Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; [email protected] (P.-Y.Z.); [email protected] (L.-X.H.); [email protected] (S.-J.H.); [email protected] (Z.-X.N.) 2 The Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Genetic and Improvement of Jiangxi Province, Institute of Biological Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang 330096, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-025-8542-7882 † Peng-Yan Zhou and Li-Xing Hui contributed equal. Abstract: Liriodendron chinense (Hemsley) Sargent is a Class II protected plant in China as natural populations are on the verge of extinction. There is still a lack of systematic research on the genetic resources of its geographic populations. In this study, we used 20 pairs of SSR markers with high polymorphism to analyze a total of 808 L. chinense samples from 22 regions, and 63 Liriodendron tulipifera Linn samples from 2 regions were used as a comparison group. The results revealed a total of 78 alleles in L. chinense, and the average expected heterozygosity (He) was 0.558, showing a low level of genetic diversity. The degree of differentiation of L. chinense was high, with the differentiation coefficient (Fst) as high as 0.302, which is related to the low gene flow (Nm = 0.578).
    [Show full text]
  • Arborerum Spring Planting Notes
    ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION _ of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 16 .~Z.41~ 4, 1956 NUMBERS 4-5 ARBORETUM SPRING PLANTING NOTES planting at the Arnold Arboretum goes on year after year, unheralded Sand PRING unsung, yet many extremely interesting plants will eventually grow into the public’s notice. Young plants are necessarily pruned very heavily when they are transplanted to the grounds here, so that frequently several years elapse be- fore such plants eventually reach any real size and become noticeable to the horticultural-minded visitor. However, a close scrutiny of any year’s planting list will show many an old variety being replaced in young form (making it pos- sible to remove diseased or damaged specimens), and many new plants being placed that have never been in the Arboretum collections before. Some are prob- ably new to any American planting. Brief information concerning a few of the trees and shrubs planted out this spring will be of interest m this respect. It should be pointed out that to reach planting size, these plants ha~ e been growing in the nurseries of the Arnold Arboretum anywhere from one to sixteen years. Some must be tested for hardiness before they are planted in the perma- nent collections ; others must be checked when they flower to make certain they are named correctly. So, although they may be noted in the following pages as "new" to the permanent collections, they have all been growing in the Arbore- tum nurseries for several years. This is only part of a lengthy testing program for new plants which is going on continually, year after year.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07017-2 - Plants of China: A companion to the Flora of China Edited BY Hong De-yuan and Stephen Blackmore Excerpt More information Chapter Introduction 1 Stephen Blackmore HONG De-Yuan Peter H. Raven and Alexandra H. Wortley 1.1 Introduction: China – garden of the world At the time the first humans (the genus Homo) first appeared on Earth, about 2.3 million years ago, the The flora of China is astonishing in its diversity. With climates thus cycled between cold and warm, depending 32 500 species of vascular plants, over 50% of them on the position of the ice sheets. The vegetation of the endemic, it has more plant species and more botanical planet reflected these climatic and physical factors, with variety than any other temperate country, and more than all lush equatorial rainforests, prairies and savannas, alpine but a few tropical countries. meadows extending to their vertical limits, boreal forests and arctic tundra. Until around 11 200 years ago, when Just why the flora of China is so diverse is a complex agriculture was first developed, humans lived in bands issue: many historical factors can account for the degree of ca. 30–45 people that rarely came into contact with of richness of plant life found in different places on Earth, one another; it is estimated that the total global human including the changing face of the Earth itself. Some 180 population on all continents amounted to perhaps three million years ago, before vascular plants had evolved, the million people. As human numbers increased, at first continents were gathered together as a gigantic land mass slowly and then with increasing rapidity, to perhaps 300 known as Pangaea.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Pathway Design Modifications Could Greatly Improve Safety for All Visitors
    CONTENTS 03 Project Details 07 Exhibit A | Park Map 08 Exhibit B | Link to Relevant Documents 09 Exhibit C | Strategic Plan 02 Level 1 Multimodal Pathway Design Improvements for the Charles River Esplanade in Boston, MA SUMMARY The Esplanade Association (EA), in partnership with the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), seeks professional services including planning, design, permitting, and construction management for multimodal pathway design modifications within the Charles River Esplanade park. The consultant will work in collaboration with representatives from EA and DCR to develop site-specific solutions to improve pathway safety for all users in this dynamic urban green space. EA is embarking on what is expected to be a series of multi-year, multi-level projects to improve the Esplanade pathway system, beginning with Immediate Impact improvements such as signage and pavement markings, building up to Major Impact improvements such as pathway design changes, and culminating with Multigenerational Impact projects that will see the expansion of the Esplanade’s multimodal pathway network. This RFP is designated for the Level 1 Immediate Impacts Project with the goal of improving pathway safety at priority locations on the Esplanade. Proposals from qualified applicants are requested by Thursday, May 20, 2021. Qualified Level 1 applicants may be eligible to receive the RFPs designated for the Level 2 Major Impact Projects and/or the Level 3 Multigenerational Impact Projects, when they become available. ORGANIZATIONAL BACKGROUND The Esplanade Association is a 100% privately funded nonprofit organization that works to revitalize and enhance the Charles River Esplanade, sustain its natural green space, and build community by providing educational, cultural, and recreational programs for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Liriodendron Tulipifera Family: Magnoliaceae
    Cultivation Notes No. 51 THE RHODE ISLAND WILD PLANT SOCIETY Winter 2010 Tulip-tree – Liriodendron tulipifera Family: Magnoliaceae By Dick Fisher Liriodendron tulipifera is one of Rhode Island’s majestic native trees. Its common name refers both to its tulip-like spring flowers and to its classic leaf shape. It is also known as Whitewood, Tulip-poplar, and Yellow Poplar, although it is not actually related to the poplars, but instead is a member of the Magnolia family. It has a long history originating in the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago) and, in the pre-glacial L. tulipifera, flower L. tulipifera era, grew throughout Europe and Asia. Today its native range is confined to eastern North America. Liriodendron chinense, a native of China, is the only other species in the Liriodendron genus. The Tulip-tree’s current range is from southern New England, including Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont, west to the great lakes and south to Louisiana and Florida. In our area it commonly attains a height of 50 to 100 feet with a diameter of two to six feet, often growing taller than maples and oaks. In the southern Appalachian states it may reach a height of 200 feet and live 250 to 300 years. A truly magnificent tree, it is the designated state tree of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Indiana. The Rhode Island Tree Council Champion Trees registry lists four individual Liriodendron in its top 25 biggest trees, and it appears eight times in the top 25 tallest. For individual height it holds second place in Rhode Island at 115 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the American Horticultural Society, Inc
    Journal of the American Horticultural Society, Inc. 901 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 For United Horticulture ... The particular objec.ts and business of the American Horticultural Society a.ye to promote and encourage national in·terest in scientific research and education in horticulture in all of its branches. 1970-71 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (*) President Treasurer DR. DAVID G. LEACH (1971) MR. JOHN M. PATEK (1972) 1674 Trinity Road President North Madison, Ohio 44057 Color Data, Inc. 434 Mount Airy Drive First Vice President Rochester, New York 14617 MRS. ERNESTA D. BALLARD (1973) Director, Pennsylvania MembeT of the Board Horticultural Society DR. HENRY M. CATHEY (1973) 325 Walnut Street Leader, Ornamental Investigations Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 Agricultural Research Service Second V ice President U.S. Department of Agriculture Beltsville, \!faryland 20705 MR. FREDERICK J. CLOSE (1971) 6189 Shore Drive Immediate Past President North Madison, Ohio 44057 MR. FRED C. GALLE (1971) (U) Secretary Director of Horticulture DR. GEORGE H. M. LAWRENCE (1971) Callaway Gardens 390 Forge Road Pine Mountain, Georgia 31822 East Greenwich, Rhode Island 02818 MR. O. KEISTER EVANS Executive Director Washington, D. C. (e) Members of the 1970-71 Board of Directors per bylaw provision. ( ..) Ex officio, and without vote. THE AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL MAGAZINE is the official publication of The American Horticultural Society and is issued during the Winter, Spring, Summer, and Fall quarters. The magazine is included as a benefit of membership in The American Horticultural Society, individual membership dues being $15 .00 a year. THE AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL MAGAZINE is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge in the science and art of growing ornamental plants, fruits, vegetables, and related subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston's Emerald Necklace Conservancy Announces Critical Restoration of Charlesgate Park As an Essential Link to Connect the E
    MEDIA CONTACT: Edwina A. Klünder 617.888.5859 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Boston’s Emerald Necklace Conservancy announces critical restoration of Charlesgate Park as an essential link to connect the Emerald Necklace parks, Charles River Esplanade and Commonwealth Avenue Mall This transformational project is being realized in partnership with Charlesgate Alliance, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation and Massachusetts Department of Transportation Left drawing: Charlesgate Park lies at the juncture of several regional park systems, including the Emerald Necklace, the Charles River Esplanade and the Charles River Reservation. Right drawing: Proposed improvements to Charlesgate Park would directly connect regional park systems like the Emerald Necklace and the Charles River Esplanade for the first time in more than half a century. Photo credit: Landing Studio Boston, MA June 11, 2020 – The Emerald Necklace Conservancy is announcing the re-envisioning of Charlesgate Park in Boston. This critical project will be a major improvement for urban recreation and public health, including a universally accessible children’s play area, one of the largest dog parks in the city, new pathways for bike and pedestrian use, the implementation of green infrastructure and resilience throughout including the completion of a major transportation link. Charlesgate Park, located at the intersection of Boston’s Back Bay, Fenway and Kenmore neighborhoods, was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted as the first part of the Emerald Necklace, connecting the Charles River Esplanade, Commonwealth Avenue Mall, several neighborhoods and the five-mile, six-park linear park system known as the Emerald Necklace. In the 1950s and 1960s, prioritization of road construction over parkland (Storrow Drive) compromised this once-idyllic space, overshadowing it with a highway overpass (Bowker Overpass), and dividing it with new roads and on- ramps, ultimately increasing pollution of the Muddy River and deteriorating the park’s usability.
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Cultural Landscape Report - Introduction 1
    C U L T U R A L L A N D S C A P E R E P O R T T H E E S P L A N A D E B O S T O N , M A S S A C H U S E T T S Prepared for The Esplanade Association 10 Derne Street Boston, MA 02114 Prepared by Shary Page Berg FASLA 11 Perry Street Cambridge, MA 02139 April 2007 CONTENTS Introduction . 1 PART I: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 1. Early History (to 1893) . 4 Shaping the Land Beacon Hill Flat Back Bay Charlesgate/Bay State Road Charlesbank and the West End 2. Charles River Basin (1893-1928) . 11 Charles Eliot’s Vision for the Lower Basin The Charles River Dam The Boston Esplanade 3. Redesigning the Esplanade (1928-1950) . 20 Arthur Shurcliff’s Vision: 1929 Plan Refining the Design 4. Storrow Drive and Beyond (1950-present) . 30 Construction of Storrow Drive Changes to Parkland Late Twentieth Century PART II: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS 5. Charlesbank. 37 Background General Landscape Character Lock Area Playground/Wading Pool Area Lee Pool Area Ballfields Area 6. Back Bay. 51 Background General Landscape Character Boating Area Hatch Shell Area Back Bay Area Lagoons 7. Charlesgate/Upper Park. 72 Background General Landscape Character Charlesgate Area Linear Park 8. Summary of Findings . 83 Overview/Landscape Principles Character Defining Features Next Steps BIBLIOGRAPHY. 89 APPENDIX A – Historic Resources . 91 APPENDIX B – Planting Lists . 100 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The Esplanade is one of Boston’s best loved and most intensively used open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston “Emerald Necklace” Case Study
    Report MIT Wescoat Boston “Emerald Necklace” Case Study Product of research on “Enhancing Blue-Green Environmental and Social Performance in High Density Urban Environments” Sponsored by the Ramboll Foundation 20 July 2015 Authors: Alex Marks, James L. Wescoat Jr., Karen Noiva, and Smita Rawoot Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 Report MIT Wescoat CONTENTS 1. PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. DEFINING BLUE-GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE (BGI) IN BOSTON ............................................ 5 3. SITUATING BOSTON’S BLUE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN A LOCAL, REGIONAL & COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 9 4. CHALLENGES THAT CITIES LIKE BOSTON FACE TODAY .................................................... 24 5. RESEARCH FINDINGS ON HOW BOSTON HAS ADDRESSED SUCH CHALLENGES USING BGI: THE EXPANDED PROCESS MODEL APPROACH ...................................................... 31 6. RESEARCH FINDINGS ON THE VALUES ADDED BY BGI IN BOSTON .............................. 37 7. RESEARCH FINDINGS ON INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS .......................................................... 48 8. RESEARCH FINDINGS RELEVANT FOR IMPLEMENTING FUTURE BGI PROJECTS ... 56 9. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 58 10. ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]