DOCSLIB.ORG

Post-Viva Phd Draft, Working Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Post-Viva Phd Draft, Working Version The London School of Economics and Political Science A Constructivist Analysis of Religion’s Role in Foreign Policy: The cases of Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia under the leaderships of Menachem Begin, Ayatollah Khomeini and Fahd bin Abdulaziz Magdalena Charlotte Delgado A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, November 2015 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. The final word count of this thesis, including titles, footnotes and in-text citations, is 78,012 words. 2 ABSTRACT The 1648 landmark signing of the Westphalian Treaties which famously implemented the principle of cuius regio, eius religio has, for International Relations (IR), meant that relatively little attention has been paid to religion as an influential force in international relations. A “turn to religion” amongst a growing body of IR scholars, fueled by post-Cold War studies and empirical events, has sought to change this by placing religion within the study of IR. With a view of adding to this debate, this thesis examines the role of religion in Israeli, Iranian and Saudi Arabian foreign policy during the respective leaderships of Menachem Begin (1977-84), Ayatollah Khomeini (1979-89) and Fahd bin Abdulaziz Al Saud (1975-1995). It does so by drawing on extensive primary material, including private and public discourse of the leaders in question, as well as existing literature from, primarily, Middle East Studies and Religious Studies. The thesis argues, and shows with reference to its empirical findings, that the leaders’ religious beliefs shaped their respective world-views and, by extension, their foreign policy doctrines and foreign policy outcomes. Moreover, it shows that religion played an important role in legitimizing the leaders themselves as well as their respective foreign policies. In this context, the thesis furthermore shows that, for the foreign policy leaders, religion assumed distinct meanings which were seemingly shaped according the context in which they operated. Importantly, the thesis argues, this does not uncritically support the long-standing assumption in IR scholarship that religion is epiphenomal, and/or a tool of instrumentalisation. With reference to Constructivist literature and a dynamic definition of religion developed for this project, the thesis rather explains that the malleable nature of religion can and does interact with variables like material security to shape, and sometimes drive, conceptualisations of national interest and foreign policy outcomes. The project concludes that religion’s role is multi-faceted, and, more to it, that the foreign policies of Khomeini’s Iran, Begin’s Israel and Fahd’s Saudi Arabia cannot be fully understood without it. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My most sincere gratitude goes to my supervisor, Dr. Katerina Dalacoura, who has guided me through this project in so many ways. Her unmatched analytical rigor, attention to detail and intellectual input have helped and inspired me greatly. As if that were not enough, her endless flexibility, kindness and consideration have been a continuous source of support, and meant more to me than I can possibly express here. I am truly grateful to have been guided through this experience by someone who is every bit the mentor a Doctorate student could wish for. I would also like to thank the ever-helpful individuals that have commented on my work, or helped me in some other way over the past four years. First and foremost, staff and students at the Department of International Relations at the LSE, especially Martina Langer and Gabrielle To, for providing a friendly “home.” I also thank Prof. Chris Alden and Dr. James Strong for their constructive feedback during my presentations in the FPA workshop, as well as Prof. Fawaz Gerges and participants of the Middle East workshop, especially Irena Kalhousova for her thorough feedback on my Israel chapter. I am also grateful to Father Michael Lang of the Brompton Oratory, Arnon Lammfrom of the Israeli State Archives, as well as the extraordinarily hospitable individuals I met during my fieldwork in Iran, for taking the time to discuss parts my thesis with me. During this journey, wonderful relationships have formed, shaping my work and myself. A big thank you goes to the PhD cohort of 2011, above all, to Melissa Koluksuz and Neal Suleimanova, for their constant friendship, but also to Emmanuelle Blanc, Julia Muravska, Alex Dueben, Philipp Lamprecht, Martin Niemetz, John Hemmings and Borja Guijarro-Usobiaga, without whom the past four years would not have comprised quite the fun, ridiculous, stimulating, traumatic and altogether extraordinarily fulfilling experience, that they have. In year one, I proclaimed in the Garrick that “social relations are key to intellectual advancement,” admittedly as a justification for our countless coffee-breaks; now, I say it with honest certainty and would, by the way, add “happiness” to the end of that statement. I am sincerely grateful for our memories. May our friendships long outlast the PhD! Finally, a handful of special people from outside the LSE have been part and parcel of this journey. To my parents and extended family, especially my grandmother: thank you for your support and motivation. Above all, I thank my mother, Didde Munck, without whose emotional and financial support this “chapter” of my life would not have been written: your unconditional love has been my rock throughout the past four years, and throughout my life. Thank you to my best friend, Ashaa Khunti, for being a true friend. It seems like yesterday that we submitted our undergraduate dissertations together; seven years and priceless memories later, we are still going strong! To my partner who has endured a fair share of dinner debates about Theology, the Middle East and International Relations (with capital I and R!), and whose emotional and intellectual support has left its own special mark on this work: thank you for your kindness, patience and, above all, love. I would like to dedicate this thesis to my grandfather, Antonio Delgado Álvarez, whose memory has comforted and inspired me throughout the writing of this thesis, and continues to do so in its aftermath. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction and rationale p. 6-13 1.1 Researcher question, argument and contribution p. 14-20 1.2 Methodology, case selection and case design p. 21-30 1.3 Theoretical framework p. 30-42 1.4 Structure of thesis p. 43-46 CHAPTER 2. THINKING ABOUT RELIGION: KEY DEFINITION AND CONCEPTS 2.0 Introduction p. 47-50 2.1 Defining religion p. 50-60 2.2 Surveying the essentialist-functionalist definitional spectrum p. 61-68 2.3 Conclusion p. 68-69 CHAPTER 3. SETTING THE SCENE: THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF BEGIN, KHOMEINI & FAHD 3.0 Introduction p. 70-74 3.1 The Jewish State of Israel p. 74-86 3.1.1 The socio-political landscape of Israel p. 74-81 3.1.2 Menachem Begin’s decision making environment p. 82-86 3.2 The Islamic State of Iran p. 87-95 3.2.1 The socio-political landscape of Israel p. 87-91 3.2.2 Ayatollah Khomeini’s decision making environment p. 92-95 3.3 The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia p. 96-106 3.3.1 The socio-political landscape of Saudi Arabia p. 96-100 3.32 Fahd bin Abdulaziz‘ decision making environment p. 100-105 3.4 Conclusion p. 105-106 CHAPTER 4. RELIGION AND FOREIGN POLICY IN ISRAEL UNDER BEGIN (1977-84) 4.0 Introduction p. 107-118 4.1 Menachem Begin’s worldview p. 118-119 4.2 Menachem Begin’s Foreign Policy Doctrine p. 119-130 4.3 Menachem Begin and the Camp David Accords p. 130-139 4.4 Menachem Begin and Operation Peace for Galilee p. 139-141 CHAPTER 5. RELIGION AND FOREIGN POLICY IN IRAN UNDER KHOMEINI 5.0 Introduction p. 142-143 5.1 Ayatollah Khomeini’s worldview p. 144-153 5.2 Ayatollah Khomeini’s Foreign Policy Doctrine p. 154-159 5.3 Ayatollah Khomeini and the Iran-Iraq war p. 159-170 5.4 Ayatollah Khomeini and the Salman Rushdie Affair p. 170-175 5.5 Conclusion p. 176-177 CHAPTER 6. RELIGION AND FOREIGN POLICY IN SAUDI ARABIA UNDER FAHD (1982-95) 6.0 Introduction p. 178-180 6.1 Fahd Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud’s worldview p. 180-191 6.2 Fahd Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud’s Foreign Policy Doctrine p. 191-192 6.3 Fahd Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, the Camp David Accord and the “Palestinian issue” p. 193-199 6.4 Fahd Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Operation Desert Storm and the Gulf War p. 200-205 6.5 Conclusion p. 205-208 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION 7.0 Discussion of research findings p. 209-213 7.1 Pointers and avenues for future research p. 214-217 BIBLIOGRAPHY p. 218-237 5 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION “God has proven to be alive and well beyond all question” - Karen Armstrong on 9/11, 2001 attacks.1 1.0 Introduction and rationale Armstrong’s opening quote echoes what in many of the social sciences has long been a topic of debate, but in International Relations (IR) only emerged as such in the post-9/11, 2001 era. Although IR scholars have discussed religion within the broader context of Constructivism since the early 1990s, they have done so indirectly, subsuming
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alexander Von Nordheim Mphil Thesis
    IRAN'S ISLAMIC REVOLUTION: THE ULAMA, THE WEST, NATIONALISM, AND THE GROWTH OF POLITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS Alexander von Nordheim A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of MPhil at the University of St. Andrews 2012 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3231 This item is protected by original copyright SUBMISSION OF PHD AND MPHIL THESES REQUIRED DECLARATIONS 1. Candidate's declarations: ...... , hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately ..... words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in [month, year] and as a candidate for the degree of ..... in [month, year]; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between [year] and [year]. (If you received assistance in writing from anyone other than your supervisor/s): I, ......, received assistance in the writing of this thesis in respect of [language, grammar, spelling or syntax], which was provided by ....... Date .......signature of candidate .......... 2. Supervisor's declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of ...........in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date .......signature of supervisor ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Unwavering Israel-Hatred
    Iran’s Unwavering Israel-Hatred Dr. Doron Itzchakov BESA Center Perspectives No. 1,104, March 6, 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Four decades ago, the revolutionary movement led by Ayatollah Khomeini overthrew the Pahlavi dynasty and established the Islamic Republic of Iran on its ruins. Since then, significant changes have taken place in the discourse and concepts of its leaders. However, the Iranian political establishment has never wavered in its relentless hostility towards Israel. Once a friend to Israel, Tehran overnight became an archenemy dedicated to its destruction. Iran’s overnight shift from Israel’s friend to its archenemy was a strange and shocking turn of events. The two countries do not share a common border, and there is no conflict between them regarding the presence of an ethnic or religious minority – including the Jewish community living in Iran. So what was the source of such virulent and apparently indestructible hostility? To answer this question, it is helpful to examine the pattern of bilateral relations that developed between the countries not long after the establishment of the State of Israel. Bilateral relations between monarchist Iran and Israel began to warm gradually upon Iran's de facto recognition of Israel in March 1950. Iran was the second Muslim country after Turkey to recognize Israel and even opened consular representation in Jerusalem. The relationship was established during a period of global and regional change that influenced Tehran's geopolitical status, both as a buffer between East and West and within the Muslim world. Iran had to position itself in the new international order. It was a Shiite monarchy in the heart of a volatile Sunni region that was being shaken by new waves of Arab nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Battle for God : Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam Kindle
    THE BATTLE FOR GOD : FUNDAMENTALISM IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Karen Armstrong | 464 pages | 02 Apr 2001 | HarperCollins Publishers | 9780006383482 | English | London, United Kingdom The Battle for God : Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam PDF Book The Battle for God Karen Armstrong Ballantine Books , - Seiten 14 Rezensionen In the late twentieth century, fundamentalism has emerged as one of the most powerful forces at work in the world, contesting the dominance of modern secular values and threatening peace and harmony around the globe. The Battle For God. The username or password you entered is incorrect. By Peter Pomerantsev. In The Battle for God , Karen Armstrong brilliantly and sympathetically shows us how and why fundamentalist groups came into existence and what they yearn to accomplish. This is a book that will prove indispensable. CrossCurrents Forum. Dan heb jij recht op studentenkorting! The First Muslim. Britain's greatest religious historian chronicles the rise and rise of fundamentalism. Also by Karen Armstrong. Armstrong sensitively recognizes one of fundamentalism's great ironies: though they ostensibly seek to restore a displaced, mythical spiritual foundation, fundamentalists often re-establish that foundation using profoundly secular, pseudo-scientific means "creation science" is a prime example. In the late twentieth century, fundamentalism has emerged as one of the most powerful forces at work in the world, contesting the dominance of modern secular values and threatening peace and harmony around the globe. Jesus the King. Fundamentalists view the contemporary world with horror, rejecting its claims to truth, and a state of war now exists over the future of our culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Lions and Roses: an Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007)
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-13-2007 Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli- Iranian Relations Marsha B. Cohen Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI08081510 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Cohen, Marsha B., "Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations" (2007). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/5 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida LIONS AND ROSES: AN INTERPRETIVE HISTORY OF ISRAELI-IRANIAN RELATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Marsha B. Cohen 2007 To: Interim Dean Mark Szuchman College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Marsha B. Cohen, and entitled Lions and Roses: An Interpretive History of Israeli-Iranian Relations, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Karen+Armstrong+-+The+Battle+For+
    The Battle for God By: KAREN ARMSTRONG (ed. Dr Walter G Tonetto) Synopsis: About 40 years ago popular opinion assumed that religion would become a weaker force and people would certainly become less zealous as the world became more modern and morals more relaxed. But the opposite has proven true, according to theologian and author Karen Armstrong, who documents how fundamentalism has taken root and grown in many of the world's major religions, such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. Even Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism, and Confucianism have developed fundamentalist factions. Reacting to a technologically driven world with liberal Western values, fundamentalists have not only increased in numbers, they have become more desperate, claims Armstrong, who points to the Oklahoma City bombing, violent anti-abortion crusades, and the assassination of President Yitzak Rabin as evidence of dangerous extremes. Yet she also acknowledges the irony of how fundamentalism and Western materialism seem to urge each other on to greater excesses. To "prevent an escalation of the conflict, we must try and understand the pain and perception of the other side," she pleads. With her gift for clear, engaging writing and her integrity as a thorough researcher, Armstrong delivers a powerful discussion of a globally heated issue. Part history lesson, part wake-up call, and mostly a plea for healing, Armstrong's writing continues to offer a religious mirror and a cultural vision. 1 ALFRED A. KNOPF NEW YORK 2000 2 This is a Borzoi Book published by Alfred A. Knopf Copyright 2000 by Karen Armstrong All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Transformation from Revolutionary to Status Quo Power
    Iran’s Transformation from Revolutionary to Status Quo Power in the Persian Gulf Mohsen M. Milani* The following article was written by Mohsen Milani in connection with his participation in the conference entitled “Iran After 25 Years of Revolution: A Retrospective and a Look Ahead,” which was held at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on November 16-17, 2004. The opinions expressed here are those of the author and in no way represent the views or opinions of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. In March 2003, the United States did for Iran what Iran itself tried but failed to achieve after eight long years of bloody war with Iraq, namely to overthrow Saddam Husayn. As a result of this momentous event, the strategic cards in the Persian Gulf were shuffled, creating new opportunities as well as existential threats for Iran. On the one hand, Iraq, Iran’s archenemy, was defeated and its historically oppressed Shi’i majority—a potential ally for Iran—was liberated and energized, and Iran solidified its position as the most powerful indigenous force in the region. On the other hand, the United States virtually encircled Iran with its more than 150,000 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, elevating Iran’s threat perception to an unprecedented level. In what follows, I will discuss the transformation of Iran’s Persian Gulf policy since 1979, its role in past regional security regimes, its reaction to the emerging strategic situation in the region, and its current policy toward Iraq. I will make four main arguments. First, the collapse of Saddam Husayn has accelerated Iran’s transformation from a revolutionary to a regional status quo power in search of creating “spheres of influence.” One of Iran’s ultimate strategic goals is to become a hub for the transit of goods and services between the Persian Gulf and Afghanistan, Central Asia, and possibly China.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economic Dimension of the Indonesian Fundamentalism)
    Fundamentalism Versus Social Injustice FUNDAMENTALISM VERSUS SOCIAL INJUSTICE (Political Economic Dimension of the Indonesian Fundamentalism) Eduardus Lemanto* Department of Social Philosophy of People’s Friendship University of Russia Email*: [email protected] ABSTRACT Karen Armstrong in The Battle for God expresses her fear of the rise of fundamentalism. She alerts and takes a deep look at its horrific manifestations. She stresses that “ One of the most startling developments of the late twentieth century has been the emergence within every major religious tradition of militant piety popularly known as “fundamentalism"….Fundamentalists have gunned down worshippers in mosque, have killed doctors and nurses…have shots their president, and have even toppled a powerful government….Fundamentalists have no time for democracy, pluralism, religious toleration, peacekeeping, free speech….”1 Indonesia can be an “exact laboratory” to prove Armstrong’s concerns about fundamentalism, where there have been series of terrorist attacks and suicide bombings since 2000 that behooves the Indonesian stakeholders to giving their very eyes on the roots of the problem. There have been 552 acts of terror in 21 years since 2000.2 However, is fundamentalism solely rooted in the religious militant piety? The studies of the roots of fundamentalism are generally divided into two lines of thoughts. The first is those who admit the religious militant piety as the only root of fundamentalism. The other is those who take into account the problem of social injustice in the field of politics and economy as the foundation of the movement of the fundamentalists. This article is going to examine the second opinion of the absence of social justice and multidimensional approach of development at all level as the backbones and the determining factors of the emergence of the Indonesian fundamentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Sufism in Post-Revolutionary Iran Seema
    The Social Life of Gnosis: Sufism in Post-Revolutionary Iran Seema Golestaneh Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2014 ©2014 Seema Golestaneh All rights reserved Abstract The Social Life of Gnosis: Sufism in Post-Revolutionary Iran Seema Golestaneh My research examines the social and material life of gnosis for the contemporary Sufi community in post-revolutionary Iran. In contrast to literatures which confine Sufism to the literary and poetic realms, I investigate the ways in which gnosis (mystical epistemology) is re- configured as a series of techniques for navigating the realm of the everyday. In particular, I focus on the ways in which mystical knowledge (ma'arifat-e 'erfani) is utilized by the Sufis to position themselves as outside of the socio-political areana, a move that, within the context of the Islamic Republic, in and of itself possesses vast political and social repercussions. I approach gnosis in two ways: both as object of study but also as critical lens, utilizing the Sufis' own mystical epistemology to guide me in understanding and interpreting my ethnographic case studies. In my dissertation, I address the following questions: What is the role of the Sufis, a group positioned on neither side of the orthodoxy-secular divide, within post-revolutionary Iran? How does a religious group attempt to create and maintain a disavowal of the political realm in a theocracy? More broadly, what is the role of mysticism within late modernity, and how might such a question be answered anthropologically? At the heart of my dissertation is the analysis of four ethnographic case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿali Hosseini Khamenei
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Out of the Mouth of the Leader: The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce 2013 © Copyright by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Out of the Mouth of the Leader: The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Leonard Binder, Chair The political ideologies of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, are identified and analyzed based on 500 speeches (1989-2013), 100 interviews (1981-1989), his biography and other works published in Iran. Islamic supremacy, resistance to foreign powers, and progress are the core elements of his ideology. Several critical themes emerge that are consistently reflected in the formation of his domestic and foreign policies: America, Palestine, Israel, Muslim unity, freedom, progress, the nuclear program, youth, and religious democracy. Khamenei’s sociopolitical development is examined in three critical phases: In Phase I, prior to the revolution, he is seen as a political activist protesting for an Islamic government; factors shaping his early political ideology are evaluated. Phase II examines Khamenei’s post- ii revolutionary appointments and election to president; he governs the country through the eight- year Iraq-Iran war. After the death of the father of the revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini, Khamenei enters into Phase III when he assumes the office of supreme leadership; internal and external issues test and reveal his political ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGION and CONFLICT in AFRICA with a SPECIAL FOCUS on EAST AFRICA Bjørn Møller DIIS REPORT 2006:6 DIIS REPORT DIIS
    DIIS REPORT 2006:6 RELIGION AND CONFLICT IN AFRICA WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON EAST AFRICA Bjørn Møller DIIS REPORT 2006:6 DIIS REPORT DIIS DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 DIIS REPORT 2006:6 © Copenhagen 2006 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK -1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: Allan Lind Jørgensen Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 87-7605-145-5 Price: DKK 50.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Hardcopies can be ordered at www.diis.dk This publication is part of DIIS’s Defence and Security Studies project which is funded by a grant from the Danish Ministry of Defence. Bjørn Møller, Senior Research Fellow, DIIS,DIIS, [email protected]@diis.dk The author holds an MA in History and a Ph.D. in International Relations, both from the University of Copenhagen. Since 1985, he has been (senior) research fellow, subsequently programme director at the Copenhagen Peace Research Institute (COPRI), which in 2003 became part of the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). He served as Secretary General of the International Peace Research Association (IPRA) from 1997 to 2000, and has been External Lecturer at the Institute of Political Studies, University of Copenhagen since 1994 and at the Centre of African Studies since 2002. In the academic year 2003/04, he served as Visiting Associate Professor at the research centre on Development and International Relations (DIR) at Aalborg University, where he is pres- ently external lecturer.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Overview of Saudi–Iranian Relations 1
    Notes 1 Overview of Saudi–Iranian Relations 1. Saudi Arabia and Iran share at least three joint oilfields, each known by its Persian or Arabic name, respectively: Esfandiar/Al Louloua, Foroozan/Marjan, and Farzad/Hasbah. Arash/Al Dorrah is shared between Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. The three states have yet to reach an agreement over the demarca- tion of the maritime boundary in the northern Persian Gulf that affects the field. Iran’s share of the Esfandiar and Foroozan fields has dropped to levels that make their further development uneconomic, in part due to Saudi ability to extract faster from the fields. Saudi Arabia and Iran signed an agreement to develop the Farzad/Hasbah A gas field in January 2012, and were scheduled to sign a second agreement to develop the Farzad B gas field and Arash/Al Dorrah oilfield, pend- ing the removal of international sanctions against Iran. In 2014, they contested their respective shares in the Arash/Al Dorrah. 2 . British administration in the Persian Gulf began in 1622, when the British fleet helped the Persian Safavid king, Shah Abbas, expel the Portuguese from Hormuz island. The period of the British Residency of the Persian Gulf as an official colonial subdivision extended from 1763 to 1971. 3 . Interview with Abdulaziz Sager, chairman of Gulf Research Center, Riyadh, November 30, 2011. 4 . Alinaqi Alikhani, yad dasht ha-yi asaddollah alam , jeld shesh, 1355–1356 [The Diaries of Alam], vol. 6, 1975–1976 (tehran: entesharat maziar va moin, 1377), pp. 324–325; 464. When the shah insists that the United States should under- stand that it cannot make Iran “a slave [puppet] government,” Alam informs him that the Americans have tried to make contact with different groups in Iranian society—alluding to dissidents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Religion in Today's Conflict
    The Role of Religion in Today’s Conflict.1 By Ms. Karen Armstrong As we are all agreed, the conflict between the Muslim world and the West is essentially political but on a popular level religion is seen as one of its root causes. Islam is regarded in the West as an essentially violent faith that impels worshippers to acts of terror and on the Muslim side claim to be inspired wholly by the Qur’an and the Shari’ah. Secularists sometimes regard all religion as essentially divisive and obscurantist. There is a symbiotic relationship between religion and contemporary politics: each influences and exacerbates each other. It is, therefore, essential that our report looks at this dimension of the current impasse, dispels misapprehensions, gives an accurate appraisal of the precise role of religion in the current crisis, and makes some practical recommendations for the future. • First, it is important to make it clear that none of the so-called “world religions” condones or encourages killing. My recent studies show that at their inception, they were all rooted in a disciplined rejection of violence. All promote the ideals of compassion, justice and respect for the sacred rights of the individual. This is no less true of Islam than of Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism, Confucianism or Daoism. • It is true, however, that all these faiths first developed in periods of great violence and that their scriptures often bear the marks of the warfare and aggression of their time. We see this clearly in the Jewish Scriptures, the New Testament and the Qur’an, which all contain passages that can and have been used by extremists to justify violence and intolerance.
    [Show full text]