DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents Table of Contents CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Bridge Program Function and Performance Measures 5 Bridge Conditions 6 Investment in Our Bridge Infrastructure 13 2015/16 Bridge Project Summary 15 Western Hills Viaduct Replacement 17 City (DOTE) Bridges 6-Year Plan 20 County Bridges 6-Year Plan 22 Appendices Appendix A Explanation of Rating System Appendix B 2015 Individual Inspection Reports City (DOTE) Bridges County Bridges Fort Washington Way Bridges City (Skywalk) Bridges City (Other) Bridges Railroad Bridges Private Bridges Return to Contents 2 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Bridges are an essential part of Cincinnati’s transportation major maintenance responsibility for these 224 bridges, network, linking roadways and communities. Timely they are not included in this report. maintenance is critically important for the safety and welfare of the traveling public. The Department of The objectives of DOTE’s Bridge Inspection Program Transportation and Engineering (DOTE) is the city agency are to: primarily responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and 1. Provide a current information base on the condition of improving the transportation system within the City bridges within Cincinnati so that maintenance, repair, of Cincinnati. The Bridge Program is the specific program and replacement projects can be programmed within DOTE charged with the responsibility of maintaining efficiently. the bridges within this transportation system. This report is 2. Ensure that the structures continue to satisfy present the annual update to City Council informing Council of the service and safety requirements. condition of the bridges in Cincinnati and DOTE's efforts to 3. Determine the need for establishing or revisiting maintain Cincinnati’s bridge infrastructure. weight restrictions on bridges. 4. Determine and locate the extent of any structural In conformance with state law, every bridge in weakness or damage so that appropriate corrective Cincinnati is inspected on an annual basis. The ODOT actions can be taken to ensure public safety. Bridge Inspection Manual defines a bridge as “Any 5. Satisfy state and federal regulations. structure, including supports, of 10 feet or more clear span or 10 feet or more in diameter on, above, or below a Following the completion of each annual bridge inspection highway.” Within the City limits there are 450 structures cycle, this report is issued by DOTE to inform City Council which meet this criteria and are therefore classified as of the condition of the bridges in Cincinnati which are bridges. Of these 450 bridges, 226 are inspected by specifically inspected by DOTE personnel. This report also DOTE Bridge Program personnel. These inspections are functions as an annual update to inform City Council on performed in accordance with the guidelines specified in how the funds appropriated to the Bridge Program are the ODOT Bridge Inspection Manual. The remaining 224 being utilized. bridges which are part of the Interstate and State Highway systems and are inspected by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). As the City has no inspection or Return to Contents 3 INTRODUCTION Based upon maintenance responsibility, these 6. Railroad Bridges • 50 bridges: Railroad bridges that 226 bridges are divided into the following seven cross over or under public roadways. CSXT, GWRR, categories: Norfolk-Southern, and SORTA own and maintain these bridges. 1. City (DOTE) Bridges • 65 bridges: Vehicular and 7. Private Bridges • 52 bridges: Privately owned, pedestrian bridges owned by the City and maintained mostly pedestrian and utility bridges that cross over by DOTE, 17 of which are pedestrian only structures. public roadways. The applicable private owners 2. County Bridges • 26 bridges: Vehicular bridges maintain these bridges. within City limits that support improved roads which are of general and public utility running into or through Starting July 1st, 2014 an ODOT sponsored 3 year Cincinnati. By contractual agreement with Hamilton inspection program, went into effect. Through this County, DOTE maintains these bridges. Hamilton program, ODOT hired a consultant to perform inspections County funds the work performed on these bridges and load ratings for bridges carrying highway traffic that with the Municipal Road Fund. would normally be inspected by the local municipality. The 3. Fort Washington Way Bridges • 5 bridges: Bridges City of Cincinnati opted to participate in this program at no over Ft. Washington Way constructed with the Ft. direct cost to the City. As a result, in the 2015 inspection Washington Way reconstruction project. DOTE shares season (which began in January 2015 and was concluded maintenance responsibility for these bridges with in December 2015), forty-five out of the 226 bridges that ODOT. are typically inspected by DOTE personnel were inspected 4. City (Skywalk) Bridges • 16 bridges: Central by the ODOT selected consultant, HDR. This program will Business District pedestrian bridges on the skywalk continue in 2016. system owned by the City. The Department of Public Services and property owners adjacent to the bridges Throughout the remainder of this report, most of the maintain these structures. Generally, DOTE is discussion will be focused on the 65 City (DOTE) bridges responsible for the major rehabilitation of these and the 26 County bridges as the DOTE Bridge Program is bridges. responsible for maintaining these 91 bridges. 5. City (Other) Bridges • 12 bridges: Unique City owned structures located on, over, or under a roadway The individual bridge inspection reports for all 226 bridges that technically qualify as bridges. Various City under the City’s inspection responsibility are included in agencies including Parking Facilities, Storm water Appendix B of this annual report. The bridge inspection Management Utility and the Park Board maintain these reports are grouped in the order listed above (#1 through bridges. #7). Within each group, the individual bridge inspection reports are arranged alphabetically by bridge name. (-*.Ï,#!-31(, »#.3%31&%16 »#.35 »#.3Ï,#!-65 »#.3 #(.#(91 ,#0.52 Maintained by DOTE (.",-21 »#.3 #(.#(91 County uy Maintained Others ttw #&,)50 »#.3.",12 Return to Contents 4 FUNCTION AND PERFORMANCE BRIDGE PROGRAM FUNCTION AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES The goal of the Bridge Program is to preserve the 3. Performance Measure: structural integrity of all bridges that DOTE maintains so Bridge Program personnel will develop plans, request that they remain safe for the traveling public. DOTE funding, schedule, and manage bridge maintenance, established the following performance measures to track repair, and replacement work so that no less than 95% its progress in accomplishing this objective. of City (DOTE) bridges are open with no load restrictions. 1. Performance Measure: Progress: As identified in this report, 100% of all City Bridge Program personnel will annually inspect or will (DOTE) bridges are open with no load restrictions. cause to be inspected by a consultant all bridges on, over, or under public roadways within the City of Cincinnati (excluding bridges inspected by ODOT and ODOT assigned consultants) and submit this annual bridge condition report, in compliance with the Ohio Revised Code, Section 723.54. Progress: During the 2015 bridge inspection cycle, all such 226 bridges were inspected. The results of those inspections are compiled in this report. 2. Performance Measure: Bridge Program personnel will develop plans, request funding, schedule, and manage bridge maintenance, repair, and replacement work so as to maintain a Weighted Average Bridge Rating of 6 or better for bridges maintained by DOTE. A bridge General Appraisal rating of 6 represents a “Satisfactory” condition, which indicates that all primary structural elements are sound but may show some minor deterioration. Progress: As identified in this report, the present Weighted Average Bridge Rating for City (DOTE) bridges is 6.98. Return to Contents 5 BRIDGE CONDITIONS BRIDGE CONDITIONS The individual bridge ratings for all 65 City (DOTE) bridges bridges and County bridges from 1987 to 2015 is shown in and all 26 County bridges are shown on pages 8 and 10. graphical form at the bottom of page 10. At the writing of A summary of the bridge ratings for all 226 inspected this report, 100% of all City (DOTE) bridges were open bridges is shown in tabular form on page 11. The with no load restrictions. Weighted Average Bridge Rating for both City (DOTE) EXPLANATION OF RATING SYSTEM Rating Description 9 • Excellent 8 • Very Good No problems noted. 7 • Good Some minor problems. 6 • Satisfactory Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 • Fair All primary members are sound, but have minor section loss, etc. 4 • Poor Advance section loss, etc. 3 • Serious Loss of section has seriously affected primary members, local failures possible. 2 • Critical Advance deterioration of primary members. Unless closely monitored, bridge closure possible. 1 • Imminent Major deterioration, bridge is closed. Failure 0 • Failed Out of service, beyond corrective action. As indicated on the graph at the bottom of page 10, the The current Weighted Average Bridge Rating for City condition of both City (DOTE) bridges and County bridges (DOTE) bridges is 6.98. The current Weighted Average have shown general improvement over the past twenty- Bridge Rating for County bridges within the City limits is eight years. 6.34. Return to Contents 6 BRIDGE CONDITIONS WEIGHTED AVERAGE BRIDGE RATING DOTE uses a Weighted Average Bridge Rating to monitor the performance and communicate the effectiveness of the Bridge Program. The Weighted Average Bridge Rating is an adjusted average of all bridge condition ratings that accounts for the importance of the bridge as determined by its size. The weighted average is calculated using a size multiplication factor (SMF) between 1 and 5 as shown below. Size Factor Multiplier SMF Deck Area (ft2) 1 Under 5,000 2 5,000–10,000 3 10,001–20,000 4 20,001–40,000 5 Over 40,000 DOTE has been using the Weighted Average Bridge Rating for over a quarter century and has found it to be an effective tool to stress the importance of larger viaducts while not ignoring the conditions of smaller structures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case Studies of Urban Freeways for the I-81 Challenge
    Case Studies of Urban Freeways for The I-81 Challenge Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council February 2010 Case Studies for The I-81 Challenge Table of Contents OVERVIEW................................................................................................................... 2 Highway 99/Alaskan Way Viaduct ................................................................... 42 Lessons from the Case Studies........................................................................... 4 I-84/Hub of Hartford ........................................................................................ 45 Success Stories ................................................................................................... 6 I-10/Claiborne Expressway............................................................................... 47 Case Studies for The I-81 Challenge ................................................................... 6 Whitehurst Freeway......................................................................................... 49 Table 1: Urban Freeway Case Studies – Completed Projects............................. 7 I-83 Jones Falls Expressway.............................................................................. 51 Table 2: Urban Freeway Case Studies – Planning and Design Projects.............. 8 International Examples .................................................................................... 53 COMPLETED URBAN HIGHWAY PROJECTS.................................................................. 9 Conclusions
    [Show full text]
  • S.E. Johnson Companies, Inc., Docket No. 01-0456
    United States of America OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1924 Building - Room 2R90, 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 Secretary of Labor, Complainant, v. OSHRC Docket No. 01-0456 S. E. Johnson Companies, Inc., Respondent. Appearances: Paul G. Spanos, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Cleveland, Ohio For Complainant Jack Zouhary, Esq., S. E. Johnson Companies, Maumee, Ohio For Respondent Before: Administrative Law Judge Nancy J. Spies DECISION AND ORDER S. E. Johnson Companies (S. E. Johnson) is a general contractor specializing in heavy construction, such as bridges and highways. On September 18, 2000, an employee of S. E. Johnson’s subcontractor fell 17 feet from an elevated work platform and was severely injured. On October 18, 2000, as part of its local fall emphasis program, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) compliance officer Steven Medlock investigated the circumstances surrounding the accident (Tr. 21-22). As a result of the inspection, OSHA issued S. E. Johnson a serious citation on February 16, 2001. The Secretary alleges that S. E. Johnson insufficiently pre-planned for adequate fall protection in violation of § 1926.502(a)(2) (item 1). She further asserts that a section of guardrail had only one railing and that it was not anchored to withstand 200 pounds of force in violation of §§ 1926.502(b)(2) (item 2) and 1926.502(b)(3) (item 3). S. E. Johnson denies the allegations and asserts that if any violation occurred it was the result of the misconduct of the subcontractor’s employee. For the reasons that follow, the Secretary failed to prove a violation for oversight and fall protection planning (item 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Revive Cincinnati: Lower Mill Creek Valley
    revive cincinnati: neighborhoods of the lower mill creek valley Cincinnati, Ohio urban design associates february 2011 STEERING COMMITTEE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Revive Cincinnati: Charles Graves, III Tim Jeckering Michael Moore Emi Randall Co-Chair, City Planning and Northside Community Council Chair, Transportation and OKI Neighborhoods of the Lower Buildings, Director Engineering Dave Kress Tim Reynolds Cassandra Hillary Camp Washington Business Don Eckstein SORTA Mill Creek Valley Co-Chair, Metropolitan Sewer Association Duke Energy Cameron Ross District of Greater Cincinnati Mary Beth McGrew Patrick Ewing City Planning and Buildings James Beauchamp Uptown Consortium Economic Development PREPARED FOR Christine Russell Spring Grove Village Community Weston Munzel Larry Falkin Cincinnati Port Authority City of Cincinnati Council Uptown Consortium Office of Environmental Quality urban design associates 2011 Department of City Planning David Russell Matt Bourgeois © and Buildings Rob Neel Mark Ginty Metropolitan Sewer District of CHCURC In cooperation with CUF Community Council Greater Cincinnati Waterworks Greater Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewer District of Robin Corathers Pat O’Callaghan Andrew Glenn Steve Schuckman Greater Cincinnati Mill Creek Restoration Project Queensgate Business Alliance Public Services Cincinnati Park Board Bruce Demske Roxanne Qualls Charles Graves Joe Schwind Northside Business Association CONSULTANT TEAM City Council, Vice Mayor City Planning and Buildings, Director Cincinnati Recreation Commission Urban Design Associates Barbara Druffel Walter Reinhaus LiAnne Howard Stefan Spinosa Design Workshop Clifton Business and Professional Over-the-Rhine Community Council Health ODOT Wallace Futures Association Elliot Ruther Lt. Robert Hungler Sam Stephens Robert Charles Lesser & Co. Jenny Edwards Cincinnati State Police Community Development RL Record West End Community Council DNK Architects Sandy Shipley Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati: Many Rivers Run Through It
    Cincinnati: Many Rivers Run Through It Susan Paddock Attendees at ICMA’s 86th Annual Conference 2000 in September, held in Cincinnati/ Hamilton County, will see that the Ohio River is a fascinating local asset. Downtown and riverfront development means that more attractions are yet to come. Cincinnati always has been defined by its relationship to the Ohio River. This enviable river location symbolizes the success Cincinnati enjoys as an ever- changing place to live, work, and play. Cincinnati’s early development was a direct result of its access to the river because commerce thrives in a location with a transportation advantage. Growth and development in the downtown and on the riverfront reflect the “rivers” that now flow through the city, as well as next to it. Cincinnati’s rivers of vitality, tradition, information, creativity, and opportunity demonstrate the city’s advantages not only in transportation but also in quality of life, historic preservation, technology, the arts, and development. River of Vitality Streams of people living, working, and playing in Cincinnati contribute to its urban environment. In particular, the city’s broad-ranging, well-planned housing options create a 24-hour city full of vitality. Eugenie Birch, professor and chair of the department of city and regional planning at the University of Pennsylvania, has compared housing trends in 40 cities from 1990 to 1999. She found in her 1999 study “Downtown Living: A Deeper Look” that Cincinnati had one of the more robust markets in downtown housing in the United States. “Cincinnati is one of the brighter stories,” Ms. Birch says.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Design Master Plan
    urban design associates Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan 33 Urban Design Master Plan urban design associates Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan i Urban Design the cincinnati central riverfront Urban Design Master 34 Plan is the result of a public participation planning process Master Plan begun in October 1996. Hamilton County and the City of Cincinnati engaged Urban Design Associates to prepare a plan to give direction in two public policy areas: • to site the two new stadiums for the Reds and the Bengals • to develop an overall urban design framework for the development of the central riverfront which would capitalize on the major public investment in the stadiums and parking A Riverfront Steering Committee made up of City and County elected officials and staff was formed as a joint policy board for the Central Riverfront Plan. Focus groups, inter- views, and public meetings were held throughout the planning process. A Concept Plan was published in April 1997 which identi- fied three possible scenarios for the siting of the stadiums and the development of the riverfront. The preparation of a final Master Plan was delayed due to a 1998 public referendum on the siting of the Reds Ballpark. Once the decision on the Reds Ballpark was made by the voters in favor of a riverfront site, Hamilton County and the City of Cincinnati in February 1999 appointed sixteen promi- nent citizens to the Riverfront Advisors Commission who were charged to “recommend mixed usage for the Riverfront that guarantees public investment will create sustainable develop- ment on the site most valued by our community.” The result of that effort was The Banks, a September 1999 report from the Advisors which contained recommendations on land use, park- ing, finance, phasing, and developer selection for the Central Riverfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals Entertainment Venue and Event Center at the Banks
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ENTERTAINMENT VENUE AND EVENT CENTER AT THE BANKS THE REDEVELOPMENT OF OHIO’S SOUTHERN GATEWAY CINCINNATI, OHIO ISSUANCE DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2018 PROPOSALS DUE: MARCH 15, 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ENTERTAINMENT VENUE AND EVENT CENTER AT THE BANKS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Project Site Description ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Development Timeline ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Inclusion Policy; Small Business Enterprise ....................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Ownership ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6. Project Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.7. Selection Process .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati Reds Press Clippings January 30, 2019
    Cincinnati Reds Press Clippings January 30, 2019 THIS DAY IN REDS HISTORY 1919-The Reds hire Pat Moran as manager, replacing Christy Mathewson, when no word is received from him while his is in France with the U.S. Army. Moran would manage the Reds until 1923, collecting a 425-329 record 1978-Former Reds executive, Larry MacPhail, is elected to the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum 1997-The Reds sign Deion Sanders to a free agent contract, for the second time ESPN.COM Busy Reds in on Realmuto, but would he make them a contender? Jan. 29, 2019 Buster Olney ESPN Senior Writer The last time the Cincinnati Reds won a postseason series, Joey Votto was 12 years old, Bret Boone was the team's second baseman and the organization had only recently drafted his kid brother, a third baseman out of the University of Southern California named Aaron Boone. Since the Reds swept the Dodgers in a Division Series in 1995, they have built more statues than they have playoff wins. In recent years, a Dodger said he was sick of Kirk Gibson -- not because of anything Gibson had done, but because the team had felt the need to roll out the highlight of Gibson's epic '88 World Series home run, in lieu of subsequent championship success. Similarly, most of the biggest stars in the Reds organization continue to be Johnny Bench, Joe Morgan, Pete Rose and Tony Perez, as well as announcer Marty Brennaman, who recently announced he will retire after the upcoming season.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucin1250530675.Pdf (8.44
    U UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: I, , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: in It is entitled: Student Signature: This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Approval of the electronic document: I have reviewed the Thesis/Dissertation in its final electronic format and certify that it is an accurate copy of the document reviewed and approved by the committee. Committee Chair signature: Skywalks as Heritage: Exploring Alternatives for the Cincinnati Skywalk System A thesis submitted to Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF COMMUNITY PLANNING School of Planning College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning August 2009 By SILVIA GUGU Bachelor of Urban Design, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Design, Bucharest Thesis Committee: Chair: MAHYAR AREFI, Ph. D. Faculty Member: FRANK RUSSELL, AIA. Abstract Skywalks are a unique typology of second level covered pedestrian networks linking parking and downtown destinations. They were implemented throughout North American cities to attract pedestrians and sustain retail in central business districts. The relative rarity of skywalk systems (Robertson 1994), their relevance to the particularities of American urban design history (Fruin 1971; Robertson 1994) and their position at the intersection of major concerns of the 20th century American city: traffic (Fruin 1971; Robertson 1994), downtown revitalization (Robertson 1994), and identity (McMorough 2001) provided the departure point for examining skywalks as 20th Century heritage. As the viability of skywalks is questioned, this paper employs a toolkit based on the theory and values of heritage preservation to evaluate skywalks as built heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.0 Public Involvement and Agency
    Cincinnati Streetcar Project Environmental Assessment 6.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND AGENCY COORDINATION Public outreach activities for the Cincinnati Streetcar project have occurred through the project website, mailings, news articles, meetings and presentations with stakeholders and citizens since 2007. A public involvement program for the Cincinnati Streetcar project was initiated for the Cincinnati Streetcar Feasibility Study (July 2007). The City of Cincinnati will continue to develop and implement this program throughout all phases of the project to keep citizens informed and engaged in the streetcar project. 6.1 Videos and Website The City of Cincinnati developed a video of the proposed modern streetcar, which was distributed throughout the community and posted on www.youtube.com. The City also developed an enhanced streetcar website found at www.cincinnati-oh.gov. This website contains a wide range of information about the streetcar and its benefits to Cincinnati and the region. The website is updated to reflect the latest information associated with the project. 6.2 Mailings The City of Cincinnati distributes project information through mass mailings to citizens within the study area. In February 2011, approximately 6,000 postcards were mailed to citizens and businesses within a three block radius of the streetcar route. This postcard promoted the benefits of the streetcar and provided an opportunity for citizens to sign up for project updates and construction news. 6.3 Community Briefings and Presentations The following is a list
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended FY 2016-FY 2017 Biennial Budget Document
    May 13, 2015 Dear Council Members, I am transmitting to you a copy of the City Manager’s Recommended 2016-2017 Fiscal Year Budget (“proposed budget”) for review and also making a copy available to the general public via the City’s website. For the second consecutive year, a structurally balanced budget has been proposed that places an emphasis on fiscal sustainability. It is my belief that the City Manager’s proposed budget generally makes sound and reasonable fiscal recommendations, including strategic investments designed to continue Cincinnati’s recent momentum on economic growth. Most important, this budget will take our inventory of roads from being rated as “fair” and “deteriorating” to “good” and “improving.” Additionally, the proposed budget includes performance metrics for the first time to create greater accountability for City departments. It also funds an important priority, the City’s first-ever Department of Economic Inclusion. This initiative will help minority- and women-owned businesses navigate the process to bid for municipal contracts and ensure a level playing field. In the next few weeks, we will discuss the proposed budget and solicit input from residents. I am looking forward to working cooperatively with you all in what’s sure to be a lively and productive budget deliberation. I recommend passage without amendment, but will work with you on reasonable changes. Sincerely, Mayor John J. Cranley, City of Cincinnati City of Cincinnati - FY 2014-2015 Recommended Biennial Budget 1 Fiscal Years 2016-2017 All Funds Operating Budget City Manager’s Recommended Biennial Operating Budget Mayor John Cranley Vice-Mayor David Mann Members of City Council Kevin Flynn Amy Murray Chris Seelbach Yvette Simpson P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucin974836791.Pdf (6.08
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI _____________ , 20 _____ I,______________________________________________, hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: ________________________________________________ in: ________________________________________________ It is entitled: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Approved by: ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Highway Bridges A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science of the College of Engineering 2000 by Victor J. Hunt B.S.E.E., University of Cincinnati, 1988 M.S., University of Cincinnati, 1991 Committee Chair: Arthur J. Helmicki, Ph.D. Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Highway Bridges Abstract This research seeks the rational organization and integration of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technologies, the methods of structural identification, and concepts of reliability and fault detection, each according to its merits, within a system devoted to monitoring the state-of-health of an instrumented structure. A global NDE methodology has
    [Show full text]
  • 505 Vine Street FOUNTAIN Place FOUNTAIN Place Fountain Place Is a Mixed-Use Development Overlooking Fountain Square - the Epicenter of Downtown Cincinnati
    505 Vine Street FOUNTAIN Place FOUNTAIN Place Fountain Place is a mixed-use development overlooking Fountain Square - The epicenter of downtown Cincinnati. Fountain place is the lynchpin of Downtown retail, connecting Fountain Square to the hotels, convention center and surrounding offices. Moreover, Fountain Square is the bridge connecting The Reds and Bengals stadium district (The Banks) to the South and the Over-The-Rhine (OTR) neighborhood to the North. Fountain Place is the most visible and accessible location to all Downtown visitors and daily population. FOUNTAIN Place 84.510 FOUNTAIN • Approximately 4,893 - 8,730 PLACE SF of ground-level retail space with various demising options. STREETCAR STOP • Located on the corner of 5th & Vine Street, Fountain place faces Fountain Square, the epicenter of the FUTURE CONVENTION CBD where 3 Million people gather HOTEL throughout the year for multiple events 4TH & RACE on the square. • 1 block away from the Cincinnati Bell Streetcar Connector - A 3.6 mile loop that connects Cincinnati’s riverfront at The Banks, Downtown and Over-The-Rhine. • Other retail opportunities by 3CDC available at 84.51° and 4th & Race. PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS CENTRAL PKWY W CLIFTON AVE McMICKEN AVE E AC R JACKSON HILL PARK HENRY LAP M UN D EL FINDLAY MULBERRY FINDLAY MARKET VINE ELDER IC Y BL U PKW McMICKEN AVE JOHN LIBERTY L REP SYCAMORE GREEN CENTRA LOGAN BAUER AVE L RA NT WADE E CE MOORE NT AC R MILTON ODEON UBLIC LIBERTY PLEASA REP VINE 15TH NUT AL W 15TH IN MAGNOLIA MA ORCHARD 14TH EZZARD CHARLES DR HIGHLAND 14TH CAMORE
    [Show full text]