DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Lakes Basin Water Availability and Use a Study of the National Assessment of Water Availability and Use Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Great Lakes Basin Water Availability and Use a Study of the National Assessment of Water Availability and Use Program Great Lakes Basin Water Availability and Use A study of the National Assessment of Water Availability and Use Program At the request of Congress, the U.S. Basin contains so many communities, Water Availability and Use assessment Geological Survey (USGS) is assessing industries, and ecosystems that depend will provide information to fill this need the availability and use of the Nation’s on present sources of water, and because for the U.S. part of the Great Lakes, their water resources to gain a clearer under- competition for available water is inten- tributary streams, and the ground-water standing of the status of our water sifying, there is a need to quantify the system that feeds the Great Lakes and its resources and the land-use, water-use, region’s water resources and the trends tributaries. and natural climatic trends that affect affecting them so that the potential for them. The goal of the National Assess- possible future water-use conflicts can be Great Lakes Basin Study ment of Water Availability and Use Pro- reduced or avoided. Water availability is a function of gram is to improve our ability to forecast In recent years, numerous govern- water availability for future economic ment agencies, commerce, industry, and many factors, including the quantity and and environmental uses. Simply put, the the general public all have expressed quality of water and the laws, regula- assessment will help characterize how concern about potential large withdrawals tions, economics, and environmental much water we have now, how water of water within the Great Lakes Basin. factors that control its use. The focus availability is changing, and how much In response, the Great Lakes States and of the Great Lakes Basin study is on water we can expect to have in the future. Canadian Provinces signed an Annex improving fundamental knowledge of the Currently (2005), the assessment to the Great Lakes Charter in 2001. The water balance of the basin, including the is focused on the Great Lakes Basin Annex commits the States and Provinces flows, storage, and water use by humans. (fig.1) to determine the best methods to to science-based water-resources manage- An improved quantitative understand- evaluate water resources and to develop ment. This commitment requires a more ing of the basin’s water balance not only strategies for delivering information detailed understanding of the region’s provides key information about water about water availability and use. Other water resources and a synthesis of avail- quantity but also is a fundamental basis water-resources regions will be added able data and information. The USGS to the assessment as evaluation methods 0 0 90 80 improve and as funding permits. JAMES BAY Water-Resources Issues in O N T A R I O the Great Lakes Basin EXPLANATION 0 GREAT LAKES BASIN The Great Lakes Basin, which 50 encompasses Lakes Superior, Michi- CA gan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario (fig. 1), U. NA S. DA ERIOR A. SUP Q U E B E C KE contains 95 percent of the fresh surface LA St. Marys water in North America and 18 percent River Straits of of the fresh surface water in the world. Mackinac St. Lawrence Ground water underlying the basin River LAKE WISCONSIN constitutes another large volume of N HURON A G I freshwater. Humans, animals, and plants H C LAKE I 0 M MICHIGAN ONTARIO have adapted to this abundance in water 45 E K St. Clair A River Niagra L River NEW resources. Yet, even in this water-rich Lake St. Clair YORK DA CANA A. area, water withdrawals, diversions, and Detroit U. S. River LAKE use sometimes conflict with the needs of ERIE PENNSYLVANIA other users and ecosystems in the basin. ILLINOIS For example, pumping of large water- INDIANA OHIO supply wells in Wisconsin and Illinois has lowered ground-water levels in other wells in the area, reducing the yield Base from ESRI, 2001; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,1998; and Environment Canada,1995. 0 50 100 150 200 MILES of water to those wells and increasing 0 50 100 150 200 KILOMETERS pumping costs. Because the Great Lakes Figure 1. Location of the Great Lakes Basin in the United States and Canada. U.S. Department of the Interior Fact Sheet 2005–3113 U.S. Geological Survey Printed on recycled paper November 2005 USGS Minnesota stream gage during 2001 spring flood (photograph by Eric S. Wakeman, U.S. Geological Survey). for many analyses of water quality and characterized in a variety of ways. For of these streamflow changes could be ecosystem health. many uses, an appropriate measure of far greater. Another aspect of quantify- streamflow is the “minimum daily flow,” ing future water availability is to quan- Water Levels of the Great Lakes which is especially important during tify trends—especially those related to The water-level elevations of Lakes droughts. For municipal wastes, a mea- floods, droughts, and seasonal timing. Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario have sure of the low flow of a stream quanti- If significant trends are detected, subse- varied about 6 feet since 1860, when fies water available for effluent dilution quent investigations may determine the accurate records of lake levels were first or “assimilative capacity” for which a cause. That information will help inform recorded. Water levels in Lake Supe- treatment plant is designed. Other statis- plans for future water use or watershed rior varied about 3 feet during the same tics characterize the seasonal distribution development and will help water-resource interval. Prehistoric variations were much or persistence of streamflow. As a first managers determine an appropriate greater and were strongly correlated with step toward quantifying water availability, network for monitoring streamflow in the climate change. Changes in water levels this project will assemble published sta- basin. of the Great Lakes constitute the largest tistics and compute relevant new statistics Unmeasured streamflow. —The USGS changes in the amount of water in the for streams now or previously gaged. currently measures streamflow for only Trends in Streamflow.— region. The Great Lakes Basin study will Streamflow about 70 percent of the U.S. part of summarize what is known about lake is affected by climatic factors (primarily the Great Lakes Basin. Streamflow for levels over the past 4,700 years. This precipitation) and watershed charac- the remaining ungaged tributaries will analysis of lake levels will help put recent teristics including human factors such be estimated for this study by means low lake levels into perspective, espe- as urbanization, stream regulation, and of regional regression and correlation cially given the prospect of future global water diversions. Changes among these techniques to determine the contribution warming. factors have altered the timing and of those areas to the water balance. This rates of streamflow and, in some places method will allow USGS scientists to (especially urban areas), have affected Streamflow make monthly estimates of total tributary the magnitude and frequency of floods streamflow to the Great Lakes, which Streamflow maintains the water levels and low flows. In the past, these effects will be provided online by way of USGS of the Great Lakes, nourishes ecosystem were either unrecognized or dispersed Web sites. habitats, furnishes an essential raw mate- through a sparse, rural population and rial for a variety of industries, and carries economy. Today, the economic, envi- away municipal wastes. Corresponding ronmental, and political consequences to these uses, streamflow availability is Golf-course irrigation well and water distribution system (photograph by N. Grannemann, U.S. Geological Survey). Ground-Water Flow and Storage from aquifers or if natural changes take computed recharge rates. The recharge place in the ground-water system. The component of this assessment will evalu- Ground water is a major natural Great Lakes Water Availability and Use ate new and existing methods to deter- resource in the Great Lakes Basin assessment will delineate ground-water mine spatial recharge rates and trends in because it is, in effect, a large subsur- divides for most aquifers in the Great recharge over time. face reservoir. Ground water discharges Lakes hydrologic system. This delin- Great Lakes Basin Hydrogeologic naturally to streams, lakes, and wetlands. eation will be a synthesis of data and Summary. —Previous hydrogeologic It is also tapped for drinking water by information from previous and current studies in the Great Lakes Basin consist many water suppliers and residents of regional and local studies. Where pos- of a variety of regional and subregional the basin who do not use water directly sible, areas where divides have shifted as investigations that were appropriate for from the lakes. Two major ground-water a result of ground-water withdrawals or a specific purpose but are difficult to resource issues in the Great Lakes Basin natural causes will be delineated. synthesize into a broader view of water are the amount of ground water available Recharge. —Areal recharge is the pri- availability and use basinwide. As part of at a given location and the interaction mary source of water to the ground-water the hydrogeologic summary effort, results of ground water with surface water. The system; however, regional estimates of from published studies will be com- Great Lakes Basin Water Availability ground-water recharge in the Great Lakes piled, evaluated, and synthesized. Where and Use assessment will address various Basin can differ substantially depend- possible, the amount of ground water in aspects of these ground-water issues. ing on the methods used. Consistent and storage will be determined, and changes Ground-water divides. —Ground- accurate estimates are needed to under- in ground-water storage through time will water divides are like watershed (land- stand how recharge to the ground-water be assessed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AN OVERVIEW of the GEOLOGY of the GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J
    AN OVERVIEW OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE GREAT LAKES BASIN by Theodore J. Bornhorst 2016 This document may be cited as: Bornhorst, T. J., 2016, An overview of the geology of the Great Lakes basin: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 1, 8p. This is version 1 of A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum Web Publication 1 which was only internally reviewed for technical accuracy. The Great Lakes Basin The Great Lakes basin, as defined by watersheds that drain into the Great Lakes (Figure 1), includes about 85 % of North America’s and 20 % of the world’s surface fresh water, a total of about 5,500 cubic miles (23,000 cubic km) of water (1). The basin covers about 94,000 square miles (240,000 square km) including about 10 % of the U.S. population and 30 % of the Canadian population (1). Lake Michigan is the only Great Lake entirely within the United States. The State of Michigan lies at the heart of the Great Lakes basin. Together the Great Lakes are the single largest surface fresh water body on Earth and have an important physical and cultural role in North America. Figure 1: The Great Lakes states and Canadian Provinces and the Great Lakes watershed (brown) (after 1). 1 Precambrian Bedrock Geology The bedrock geology of the Great Lakes basin can be subdivided into rocks of Precambrian and Phanerozoic (Figure 2). The Precambrian of the Great Lakes basin is the result of three major episodes with each followed by a long period of erosion (2, 3). Figure 2: Generalized Precambrian bedrock geologic map of the Great Lakes basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurentian Great Lakes
    The Laurentian Great Lakes James T. Waples Margaret Squires Great Lakes WATER Institute Biology Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Brian Eadie James Cotner NOAA/GLERL Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota J. Val Klump Great Lakes WATER Institute Galen McKinley University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Atmospheric and Oceanic Services University of Wisconsin-Madison Introduction forests. In the southern areas of the basin, the climate is much warmer. The soils are deeper with layers or North America’s inland ocean, the Great Lakes mixtures of clays, carbonates, silts, sands, gravels, and (Figure 7.1), contains about 23,000 km3 (5,500 cu. boulders deposited as glacial drift or as glacial lake and mi.) of water (enough to flood the continental United river sediments. The lands are usually fertile and have States to a depth of nearly 3 m), and covers a total been extensively drained for agriculture. The original area of 244,000 km2 (94,000 sq. mi.) with 16,000 deciduous forests have given way to agriculture and km of coastline. The Great Lakes comprise the largest sprawling urban development. This variability has system of fresh, surface water lakes on earth, containing strong impacts on the characteristics of each lake. The roughly 18% of the world supply of surface freshwater. lakes are known to have significant effects on air masses Reservoirs of dissolved carbon and rates of carbon as they move in prevailing directions, as exemplified cycling in the lakes are comparable to observations in by the ‘lake effect snow’ that falls heavily in winter on the marine coastal oceans (e.g., Biddanda et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Agreement: What Happens in the Great Lakes Won’T Stay in the Great Lakes
    THE GREAT LAKES-ST. LAWRENCE RIVER BASIN AGREEMENT: WHAT HAPPENS IN THE GREAT LAKES WON’T STAY IN THE GREAT LAKES Kelly Kane This article provides a discussion of the current protections provided for the Great Lakes, and calls for an international binding agreement to ensure their continued protection. All past agreements between the United States and Canada to protect the Lakes have been purely good faith, and have no binding effect on the parties. The Great Lakes states and provinces have committed themselves to a good-faith agreement that bans all major withdrawals or diversions, subject to three exceptions. This Agreement has no legally binding effect on the states and provinces. The states, however, have created a legally binding Compact that does not include the Great Lakes provinces. The Great Lakes states have the power to make decisions regarding major withdrawals or diversions of Great Lakes water without the consent of the provinces. Although the current protections are morally binding, they will not provide enough protection for the Lakes given the increased concerns over water quality and quantity issues across the world. The federal governments of the United States and Canada should enter into a legally binding agreement to ensure the long-lasting enjoyment and protection of the Lakes. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 430 PART I: BACKGROUND ............................................................................... 432 A.Federalism and Water Management Approaches in the United States and Canada ........................................................................ 432 B.Legal History of Protections Placed on the Great Lakes ............. 433 C.Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement .................................................................. 438 D.The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems
    REHABILITATING GREAT LAKES ECOSYSTEMS edited by GEORGE R. FRANCIS Faculty of Environmental Studies University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 JOHN J. MAGNUSON Laboratory of Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706 HENRY A. REGIER Institute for Environmental Studies University of Toronto Toronto. Ontario M5S 1A4 and DANIEL R. TALHELM Department of Fish and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 37 Great Lakes Fishery Commission 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 December 1979 CONTENTS Executive summary.. .......................................... 1 Preface and acknowledgements ................................. 2 1. Background and overview of study ........................... 6 Approach to the study. .................................... 10 Some basic terminology ................................... 12 Rehabilitation images ...................................... 15 2. Lake ecology, historical uses and consequences ............... 16 Early information sources. ................................. 17 Original condition ......................................... 18 Human induced changes in Great Lakes ecosystems ......... 21 Conclusion ............................................. ..3 0 3. Rehabilitation methods ...................................... 30 Fishing and other harvesting ............................... 31 Introductions and invasions of exotics ...................... 33 Microcontaminants: toxic wastes and biocides ............... 34 Nutrients and eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • US Geologic Survey
    round goby<br /><br /> (Neogobius melanostomus) - FactSheet http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=713 NAS - Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Home Alert System Database & Queries Taxa Information Neogobius melanostomus Collection Info (round goby) HUC Maps Fishes Point Maps Exotic to United States Fact Sheet ©Dave Jude, Center for Great Lakes Aquatic Sciences Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas 1814) Common name: round goby Synonyms and Other Names: Apollonia melanostoma (Pallas, 1814), Apollonia melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) See Stepien and Tumeo (2006) for name change. Taxonomy: available through Identification: Distinguishing characteristics have been given by Berg (1949), Miller (1986), Crossman et al. (1992), Jude (1993), and Marsden and Jude (1995). Young round gobies are solid slate gray. Older fish are blotched with black and brown and have a greenish dorsal fin with a black spot. The raised eyes on these fish are also very distinctive (Jude 1993). This goby is very similar to native sculpins but can be distinguished by the fused pelvic fins (sculpins have two separate fins) (Marsden and Jude 1995). Size: 30.5 cm; 17.8 cm maximum seen in United States (Jude 1993). Native Range: Fresh water, prefers brackish (Stepien and Tumeo 2006). Eurasia including Black Sea, Caspian Sea, and Sea of Azov and tributaries (Miller 1986). 1 of 6 7/21/2011 2:11 PM round goby<br /><br /> (Neogobius melanostomus) - FactSheet http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=713 Alaska Hawaii Caribbean Guam Saipan Interactive maps: Point Distribution Maps Nonindigenous Occurrences: DETAILED DISTRIBUTION MAP This species was introduced into the St. Clair River and vicinity on the Michigan-Ontario border where several collections were made in 1990 on both the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Compact
    Great Lakes Compact Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact Summary: > The Great Lakes Agreement and Compact seek to manage the Great Lakes watershed through a collaboration with all the states and provinces in the watershed. > Each state and province must pass a law to enact the Agreement or Compact, and that law will control diversions of water from the Great Lakes watershed. > The Sustainable Water Resources Agreement is an agreement among the Great Lakes States, Ontario and Québec. In Ontario it has been enacted into law through the Safeguarding and Sustaining Ontario’s Water Act of 2007 and legislation has been approved by the National Assembly in Québec. The states are in the process of implementing the Agreement through the Water Resources Compact. Created the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Water Resources Regional Body that includes the Great Lakes Governors and the Premiers of Ontario and Québec. > The Water Resources Compact is an agreement among the Great Lakes States that is passed into law through an interstate compact. The Compact has been enacted into law in all 8 Great Lakes states. Created the Council of Great Lakes Governors composed of Governors from each Great Lakes State or their designees. History of Interstate and International Cooperation: Boundary Waters Treaty - 1909: Purpose - to prevent disputes regarding the use of boundary waters and to ensure the equitable sharing of boundary waters between Canada and the US. Treaty created the International Joint Commission (IJC) to decide issues of water diversion in the Great Lakes, and placed Canada and the US at the forefront of international efforts to protect and manage natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State of the Great Lakes Report Michigan
    MICHIGAN State of the Great Lakes 2019 REPORT 2019 STATE OF THE GREAT LAKES REPORT Page 1 Contents Governor Whitmer’s Message: Collaboration is Key ............................................................... 3 EGLE Director Clark’s Message: New Advocates for the Great Lakes Community ................. 4 New Standards Ensure Safe Drinking Water in the 21st Century ............................................ 5 Public Trust Doctrine and Water Withdrawals Aim to Protect the Great Lakes ........................ 8 High Water Levels Put State on Alert to Help Property Owners and Municipalities .................11 Asian Carp Threat from Chicago Area Looms Over Health of Lakes and Aquatic Life ............ 13 EGLE Collaborates on Research into Harmful Algal Blooms and Response Measures .......... 15 Initiatives Foster Stewardship, Raise Water Literacy for All Ages.......................................... 18 Michigan Communities Empowered to Take Action for Great Lakes Protection ...................... 22 EGLE Strengthens Michigan’s Sister State Relationship With Japan’s Shiga Prefecture ....... 24 Soo Locks Project Finally Underway with 2027 Target Date for Opening............................... 25 Great Lakes Cruises Make Bigger Waves in State’s Travel Industry ............................................. 26 MICHIGAN.GOV/EGLE | 800-662-9278 Prepared by the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy on behalf of the Office of the Governor (July 2020) 2019 STATE OF THE GREAT LAKES REPORT Page 2 Collaboration is Key hroughout the Great Lakes region, the health of our communities and the strength of our T economies depend on protecting our shared waters. The Great Lakes region encompasses 84 percent of the country’s fresh surface water, represents a thriving, $6 trillion regional economy supporting more than 51 million jobs, and supplies the drinking water for more than 48 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans of the Great Lakes Basin
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267883780 Ichthyofauna of the Great Lakes Basin Conference Paper · September 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 26 5 authors, including: Brian M. Roth Nicholas Mandrak Michigan State University University of Toronto 33 PUBLICATIONS 389 CITATIONS 173 PUBLICATIONS 2,427 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Greg G Sass Thomas Hrabik Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources University of Minnesota Duluth 95 PUBLICATIONS 796 CITATIONS 68 PUBLICATIONS 1,510 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Ecological Grass Carp Risk Assessment for the Great Lakes Basin View project All content following this page was uploaded by Greg G Sass on 14 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans of the Great Lakes Basin Brian M. Roth, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Th omas R. Hrabik, Greg G. Sass, and Jody Peters The primary goal of the first edition of this chapter (Coon 1994) was to provide an overview of the Laurentian Great Lakes fish community and its origins. For this edition, we have taken a slightly diff erent approach. Although we have updated the checklist of fishes in each of the Great Lakes and their watersheds, we also include a checklist of decapod crustaceans. Our decision to include decapods derives from the lack of such a list for the Great Lakes in the literature and the importance of decapods (in particular, crayfishes) for the ecology and biodiversity of streams and lakes in the Great Lakes region (Lodge et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Erie Watershed (Great Lakes Basin) Facts
    Lake Erie Watershed (Great Lakes Basin) Facts Drainage Area: Total: 30,140 square miles (78,063 square kilometers) In Pennsylvania: 511 square miles (1,323 square kilometers) of land and 750 square miles of lake Size of Lake Erie: Length: 241 miles east to west Width: 57 miles north to south Depth: 62 feet average and 210 feet at maximum Surface Area of the Water: 9,910 square miles th Volume: 119 cubic miles (4 largest of the Great Lakes) Watershed Address from Headwaters to Mouth: The inflow of water comes via the Detroit River from Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and many tributaries. The outflow of water is through the Niagara River and the Welland Canal. Major Tributaries in Pennsylvania: Conneaut Creek, Crooked Creek, Elk Creek, Mill Creek, Six Mile Creek, Sixteen Mile Creek, and Walnut Creek Population: Total: over 11 million people (10 million in the U.S. and 1.6 million in Canada) In Pennsylvania: more than 240,000 people Major Cities in Pennsylvania: Erie Who Is Responsible for the Overall Management of the Water Basin? Great Lakes Commission International Joint Commission – this Commission regulates flows on the St. Marys and St. Lawrence Rivers Economic Importance and Uses: Shipping, commercial and sport fishing, recreation, and drinking water Industrial Uses (2% of water usage): Manufacturing within PA includes plastics products, boilers, engines, turbines, castings, forgings, pipe equipment, motors, meters, tools, locomotives, and plastics. The fourth largest fossil-fueled electrical generating plant in North America is located on Lake Erie at Monroe, Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin
    A Report of the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board to the International Joint Commission February 2010 GROUNDWATER IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin A Report to the International Joint Commission from the IJC Great Lakes Science Advisory Board February 2010 The views expressed in this report are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in its compilation. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. i Citation: Great Lakes Science Advisory Board to the International Joint Commission (IJC), 2010. Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin, 2010. IJC, Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within the report or its appendices. ISBN 1-894280-97-0 International Joint Commission Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Ave., 8th Floor Windsor, Ontario N9A 6T3 Canada Telephone: (519) 257-6700, (313) 226-2170 World Wide Web: http://www.ijc.org This report is available in English in pdf format at: http://www.ijc.org/en/reports/2010/groundwater-in- the-great-lakes-basin This report, minus the Appendices, is available in French in pdf format at: http://www.ijc.org/fr/ reports/2010/groundwater-in-the-great-lakes-basin ii Contents Commissioners’ Preface v Groundwater in the Great Lakes Basin 1 Letter of Transmittal 8 Acknowledgements, Activities and Meetings, and Membership 10 Appendices 12 Appendix A Progress on Understanding Groundwater Issues in the Great Lakes Basin 13 Appendix B Threats to Groundwater Quality in the Great Lakes Basin — Pathogens 22 Appendix C Threats to Groundwater Quality in the Great Lakes -St.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Great Lakes
    Our Great Lakes What is happening to them, what it means and what you can do to help keep them great Table of contents A report to the public . 2 About the Great Lakes . 3 How the Great Lakes are doing . 5 Can we drink the water? . 7 Can we swim at the beach? . 9 Can we eat the fish? . 11 How are the fish doing? . 13 How is the wildlife doing? . 15 How are non-native species affecting the Great Lakes? . 17 What can you do to help? . 20 Information Resources About the Great Lakes . 24 Sources Credits Acknowledgments List of figures 2 Our Great Lakes A report to the public As Great Lakes citizens, we need a healthy Great Lakes ecosystem to ensure our own health, well-being, and economic security. The lakes were in decline during much of the 1900s, but decades of sustained efforts have been reversing the damage. People in both nations have put a tremendous effort into cleaning up our lakes and protecting them from pollution, habitat destruction, loss of native species, and invasions by non-native creatures. Governments at all levels have spent billions of dollars and assigned thousands of people to the task. Businesses and industry have spent similar sums to change products and production methods to reduce their impacts, and to clean up polluted areas. Community groups and non- governmental organizations have played important roles in the restoration of the Great Lakes. The governments of Canada and the United States want to keep everyone in the Great Lakes area informed about what is happening to the lakes, why it is happening, what is being done to restore and Under the Great Lakes Water Quality protect them, and how all of us can reduce our environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book" Re- Flection Conveys a Message That Our Actions in the Basin Are Likely to Be Reflected in the Great Lakes
    53rd Annual Conference on Great Lakes Research MAY 17 – 21 TORONTO International Association for Great Lakes Research Conference Theme Lessons from the past, Solution for the future The 53rd International Association for Great Lakes Research conference will explore how far re- search science in the Great Lakes and large lakes around the world has come over the decades, highlighting the science and policy research that has helped to improve and protect some as- pects of the Great Lakes. Today’s challenges and tomorrow’s solutions are rooted in this history as many of yesterday’s problems continue or have resurfaced today. Science and policy research presented in the areas of ecology, limnology, habitat, fisheries, invasive species, contaminants, climate impacts, watershed interactions, water quality and quantity will become part of the solu- tions for the future! Conference Logo The IAGLR-2010 logo symbolizes the conference theme. The pale blue coloured wave in the background represents the problem-plagued Great Lakes of the past, while the bright sky blue coloured wave in the foreground mimics the prosperous, rejuvenated Great Lakes aimed for in future. The CN Tower drawing highlights the conference venue—Toronto, Canada. Front Cover Design 53rd Annual Conference on Great Lakes Research The front cover of the program and abstract books illustrate the con- ference theme: Lessons from the past, Solutions for the future. The left vertical panel consisting of four pictures represents (mostly) historical or continuing issues for the Great Lakes such as point source pollution from industrial activities, nutrient & algae problems in Lake Erie, and the invasion of sea lamprey and mussels.
    [Show full text]