IGCC Quick Reference
Main Office Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, California 92093-0518
Telephone: (858) 534-3352 Fax: (858) 534-7655 Email: [email protected]
Director: (858) 534-0348 Development/External Affairs: (858) 534-0740 Publications: (858) 534-2990 Campus Programs: (858) 534-8602
Washington, D.C., Office 1608 Rhode Island Avenue, NW Third Floor Washington, D.C. 20036
Washington Representative: (202) 974-6295 Assistant: (202) 974-6296 Fax: (202) 974-6299 URL:
Campus Program Offices UC Berkeley Institute of International Studies Michael Watts, (510) 642-1106 UC Davis Institute of Governmental Affairs Alan Olmstead, (530) 752-2043 UC Irvine Center for Global Peace and Conflict Studies Wayne Sandholtz, (949) 824-6410 UC Los Angeles Burkle Center for International Relations Michael Intriligator, (310) 825-0604 UC Riverside Program on Global Studies Juliann Allison, (909) 787-4582 Christopher Chase-Dunn, (909) 787-2063 UC San Diego Institute for International Comparative and Area Studies Miles Kahler, (858) 534-3078 UC San Francisco Program in Health Science and Human Survival Christie Kiefer (415) 476-7543 UC Santa Barbara Global Peace and Security Program Mark Juergensmeyer, (805) 893-4718 UC Santa Cruz The Adlai Stevenson Program on Global Security Alan Richards, (831) 459-4662
IGCCOnline: http: The Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation IGCC Publications Robinson Center Complex 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0518 < http://www-igcc.ucsd.edu/ > IGCC NEWSWired: An Annual Review VOLUME XVIII, NUMBER 1–2, 2001 ISSN 1088-209X INT’L CIRCULATION: 12,500 The University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation Robinson Building Complex 1229 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0518 Institute on Global ConflictPhone: (858)and 534-3352 CooperationFax: (858) 534-7655 E-mail: [email protected]
IGCC NEWSWired: An Annual Review is published by the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation to inform scholars, policymakers, and the public about IGCC-sponsored research, conferences, publications, grants, and seminars. It combines and replaces the semi-annual IGCC Newsletter, and annual IGCC Brochure, Publications Listing, and International Advisory Board Reports. Single copies at no cost are available on request. Annual donations of $7.00 are optional and tax deductible.
Copyright © 2002 IGCCIGCC NEWNEWTheSS RegentsWW irediredof the University of California An Annual Review 2001IGCC is a non-profit institute with official 501 (c) (3) status. 2001We welcome your tax-deductible donations to help support IGCC NEWSWired: An Annual Review VOLUME XVIII, NUMBER 1–2, 2001 ISSN 1088-209X INT’L CIRCULATION: 12,500 The University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation Robinson Building Complex 1229 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0518 Phone: (858) 534-3352 Fax: (858) 534-7655 E-mail: [email protected]
IGCC NEWSWired: An Annual Review is published by the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation to inform scholars, policymakers, and the public about IGCC-sponsored research, conferences, publications, grants, and seminars. It combines and replaces the semi-annual IGCC Newsletter, and annual IGCC Brochure, Publications Listing, and International Advisory Board Reports. Single copies at no cost are available on request. Annual donations of $7.00 are optional and tax deductible.
Copyright © 2002 The Regents of the University of California
IGCC is a non-profit institute with official 501 (c) (3) status. We welcome your tax-deductible donations to help support our work, and encourage you to contact us about our programs and activities. Contents Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation
From the Vice Chancellor of Research 2 From the Director 3 From Campus Programs 4 What is IGCC? 5
Research Initiatives 7
Innovations in International Cooperation 9
International Security Policy 17
International Dimensions of Domestic Conflict 23 and Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy
International Environmental Policy 27
Regional Relations 33
Campus Programs 39
Administration 49
Dissemination 50
Management 56
Noteworthy 63
1 From the Vice Provost for Research UC Office of Research
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI- broad-based links to the U. S. and foreign gov- FORNIA’STHREE-FOLD MIS- ernments and foreign policy institutes from SION—research, educa- around the globe uniquely position it to provide tion, and public service— scholarly expertise on international relations remains as important to Washington policymakers as well as to today as it was when the the world community. IGCC’s presence in University was founded Washington since 1997 and continued close one hundred and fifty association with the University of California years ago in 1868. How Washington Center (UCDC) increases the access best to accomplish this UC researchers have to potential research fun- mission in the twenty-first ders and policy-oriented research opportunities. century is, as it has always Policy seminars and conferences give UC facul- been, the subject of much ty an opportunity to directly educate national Lawrence B. COLEMAN careful study, debate, and and international decision makers. deliberation among schol- With core budgetary support from the ars, administrators, legis- University, IGCC has leveraged external funds lators, and the public at large. from governmental agencies such as the Multi-campus research units (MRUs) such as Departments of the Army, Energy, and State; pri- the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation vate and corporate donors such as the Carnegie (IGCC) coordinate and promote faculty and stu- Corporation and the Markle Foundation, and dent research on a continuing basis across cam- industry leaders such as Netscape Communica- pus boundaries. IGCC also works closely with tions and the Intel Corporation into a plethora of two other facilities that are under the manage- high-level conferences, papers, and working ment of the University: the Los Alamos and groups, all aimed at furthering research in sup- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. port of international cooperation. Seed money As an MRU, IGCC is responsible to the provided by IGCC has funded programs, President of the University and reports through internships, and fellowship opportunities for the Chancellor or Chancellor’s designee at its both graduate and undergraduate students on host campus, UC San Diego. each UC campus. IGCC was founded in 1983 to study the caus- Although the expression of its core mission es of international conflict and devise options for has changed with time from an emphasis on resolving it through international cooperation. security and nuclear nonproliferation to IGCC facilitates multidisciplinary and collabo- research on a wide range of topics, including, for rative research by faculty, non-faculty profes- example, international environmental policy, sional researchers, and post-doctoral scholars globalization and governance, and the deeper and scientists; disseminates research results effects of the communications revolution and through conferences, meetings, and other activi- e-commerce on culture and society, IGCC’s core ties; strengthens graduate and undergraduate mission remains untouched. That it has contin- education by providing students with training ued to grow and prosper is an indication of opportunities and access to facilities; seeks extra- IGCC’s continued fulfillment of the tenets of its mural research funds; and carries out university and the University’s mission. and public-service programs related to its research expertise, as do the several dozen other established UC research units. However, IGCC’s Lawrence B. COLEMAN
2 From the Director UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation
EVERY PUBLIC INSTITUTION HAS CONSIDERED how Prof. David Rapoport best to respond to the events of September 11. (UCLA) is taking the lead IGCC has moved more deliberately than some in this effort to shed light to ensure that we can deliver something of value on current U.S. policy in a manner consistent with our resources and choices. mission. While our specific projects may change We are also revising cur- as we face the challenges of fund-raising and rently planned projects to coordinating the schedules of key scholars, the incorporate more elements principles guiding our choices deserve com- that are responsive to the ment. In short, we have decided that IGCC events of September 11. needs to: 1) stick closely to the core research For example, a proposed strengths of the UC faculty engaged in IGCC- program to support train- related work; 2) continue our prior efforts to ing of doctoral students on Peter F. COWHEY extend the range of UC faculty participation; 3) nuclear weapons policy is experiment with new methods of public out- being fine-tuned to incorporate the special chal- reach; and 4) strengthen our educational train- lenges raised by the capabilities of terrorist net- ing function. works. We are also exploring special funding for These principles mean that IGCC is not rush- UC–system students who do dissertation ing to offer numerous programs on terrorism research relevant to understanding terrorism. across the board. We are looking at our faculty’s This program would build on IGCC’s already strengths to determine what we can do that is strong capabilities as the UC–system’s largest both intellectually rigorous and relevant to poli- supporter of Ph.D. research on international cy. So far, we have identified three undertakings affairs. And, as we have done in the support of that exemplify this approach. students interested in nuclear weapons policy, In the first, three teams of scholars working we hope to bring together biologists, physicians, on the resolution of civil war and ethnic conflict engineers, historians, and social scientists, will compare and contrast the implications of among others, to understand the broad array of their models for the long-term effort of rebuild- issues bundled in the topic of “bioterrorism.” ing Afghanistan in a March workshop in Prior to September 11 we had embarked on Washington, D.C., co-sponsored by Stanford discussions with some of the country’s leading University. Lead UC scholars for this meeting theatrical companies about our Great Drama include Profs. Phil Roeder (UC San Diego), Don and the Issues of War and Peace Project. We Rothchild (UC Davis), and Barbara Walters (UC envision a cycle of theatrical productions San Diego). Collaborating scholars from other throughout the United States featuring major institutions include Jim Fearon and David Laitin dramas that probe such issues as the ethics of (Stanford), and Jack Snyder (Columbia). A sig- personal responsibility in warfare and the forces nificant part of the work to be discussed has of nationalism. International relations scholars been sponsored by IGCC. This forum will bring will collaborate with the theatre companies in the scholars together with key decision makers ways not attempted previously. And the public in the U.S. government, including key analysts will be engaged by the unique mix of intellec- in government agencies. We believe that out- tual and emotional arguments that serious the- reach to line-level analysts is a critical part of our atre can produce. public-education task. Second, in collaboration As the pages of this NewsWired attest, IGCC with the Canadian Centre for Foreign Policy continues to pursue a broad range of research, Development, IGCC will sponsor a workshop teaching, and public outreach projects. We thank on religion and terrorism under the leadership all of you for your support and interest and wel- of Prof. Mark Juergensmeyer (UC Santa come your comments and suggestions. Barbara). Finally, next fall IGCC and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government plan a Washington, D.C., meeting on the comparative historical analysis of anti-terrorism policies.
3 From Campus Programs UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation
IGCC’S STRENGTH •UC Berkeley’s Institute on International AS A MULTI-CAMPUS Studies program “Nuclear Weapons After RESEARCH UNIT lies September 11: Terrorism, Geopolitics, and in the unique con- International Responses.” This November tributions of each event focused on the dangers posed by nuclear of its affiliated weapons in a global environment in which ter- campus programs rorism is a strong force. and partner proj- •UC San Francisco’s Program in Health Christi GILHOI and Alia WELCH, ects with the Law- Science and Human Survival campus-wide rence Livermore Campus Programs invitational symposium, “Global Primary (LLNL) and Los Care: Challenges and Innovations,” held in Alamos National Laboratories (LANL). November as part of their ongoing Global Each of IGCC’s campus-based programs con- Partners for Primary Care project. tinues to involve and support UC faculty and •An IGCC symposium held to honor the life students through grants, fellowships, research and work of the institute’s founder, Dr. and teaching assistantships, internships, em- Herbert F. York. At the symposium, two new ployment opportunities, programming, new fellowships honoring York were announced. major/minor study programs, and the IGCC E- mail Alert. IGCC campus program activities •The establishment of the UC San Diego involve faculty, students, and community mem- Institute for International, Comparative, and bers in UC policy-oriented research and scholar- Area Studies (IICAS) as a new UCSD organ- ship on global conflict and cooperation issues. ized research unit and the new IGCC campus IGCC also continues to seek innovative part- program affiliate in December 2001. Prof. nerships with the Los Alamos and Lawrence Miles Kahler (IR/PS) serves as IICAS director. Livermore National Laboratories. These part- •UCLA’s Burkle Center for International nerships focus on ways to coordinate joint cam- Relations Twenty-second Annual Brodie pus/lab events, provide lab-based fellowship Lecture on the Conditions of Peace, held in opportunities, and encourage faculty and stu- January 2002, which featured Former U.S. dent scholarship exchange between the Secretary of State Warren Christopher. Unversity of California and the national labora- •UC Santa Cruz’s Stevenson Program on tories. Highlights of 2001–2002 campus pro- Global Security “Globalization, State Capaci- gramming include: ty, and Islamic Movements” conference, held •UC Santa Barbara’s Global and International in March 2002. This conference is part of the Studies Program annual commencement ongoing Comparative Muslim States, Move- reception for 2001 graduates in Global Studies, ments, Networks, and Strategies project. Global Peace and Security Studies, Women, •UC Davis’s Institute of Governmental Culture, and Development, and Islamic and Affairs conference “The Next Great Transfor- Near Eastern Studies, held in June 2001. mation? Karl Polanyi and the Critique of •The establishment of UC Riverside’s Program Globalization,” which draws on Polanyi's on Global Studies (POGS) as IGCC’s new insights as a starting point for an analysis of UCR campus program in July 2001. POGS is both theoretical and empirical dimensions of co-directed by Profs. Juliann Emmons Allison current and historical processes of economic (Political Science) and Chris Chase-Dunn globalization. (Sociology). The wide variety of programs is a good indi- •UC Irvine’s Center for Global Peace and cator of the unique strengths of each campus. Conflict Studies (CGPACS) annual forum. We salute the accomplishments of our affiliates Held in October 2001, “The Challenge of and look forward to partnering with them again Terror: Changing the Game Toward Sustain- this year, as well as to developing new partner- able Peace” featured a lecture by John Paul ships at UC Merced. Lederach, Professor of International Peace- building at Notre Dame University.
4 What is IGCC? A Multi-Campus Research Center for International Policy
DESPITE HOPES TO THE CONTRARY, the close of the Hewlett Foundation, the Pew Charitable Trusts, second millennium has not witnessed the end of the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers international conflict. In Africa, Asia, Eastern Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, the W. Alton Europe, and the Middle East, issues of war and Jones Foundation, the Ploughshares Fund, the peace continue to present challenges to the inter- Japan Foundation Center for Global Partner- national community. Moreover, the heinous ter- ship, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York. rorist acts of September 11, 2001 and their after- math have refocused our attention on improv- ing our foreign policies to secure the peace at IGCC’s Mission: Building home and abroad. More than ever, world prob- Bridges Between Theory lems require careful thinking, creative research, and practical approaches. and Practice Since 1983, the University of California IGCC BUILDS BRIDGES between the theory and Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation practice of foreign policy by establishing the (IGCC) has studied the causes of international intellectual foundations for effective policy- conflict and helped devise options for prevent- making, injecting fresh ideas into the policy ing or resolving it through international cooper- process. It provides opportunities and incen- ation. IGCC’s unique structure as a multi-cam- tives for UC faculty and students to interact with pus research unit (MRU) for the entire government officials at home and abroad. University of California system enables research Through collaborative research, conferences, teams to be drawn from all nine UC campuses and publications, the institute serves as a unique and the UC-managed Lawrence Livermore and resource for the state of California, the nation, Los Alamos National Laboratories, providing and the international community. broad-based links to the U.S. government, for- Whenever policy challenges require techni- eign governments, and policy institutes from cal solutions to promoting cooperation around the globe. among nations, Based at UC San Diego, IGCC supports indi- IGCC expressly Through collaborative vidual faculty and graduate student research involves the Law- research, conferences, and throughout the UC system as well as interna- rence Livermore publications, the institute tional affairs programs on each UC campus. and Los Alamos serves as a unique resource IGCC is committed to educating the next gener- National Labora- ation of international problem-solvers and tories in its proj- for the state of California, peacemakers through research and teaching ects. In IGCC’s the nation, and the activities. Nationally, the institute is one of the Northeast Asia international community. largest sources of international studies disserta- Cooperation tion and fellowship support in the country. Dialogue and Middle East Arms Control Work- IGCC receives primary support from the shops, lab participants have played integral Regents of the University of California, the roles. In regional cooperation dialogues, teach- Office of the President of the University of ing seminars, and nuclear weapons policy con- California, and the state of California. Addi- ferences, technical specialists from the labs learn tional funding has been provided by the U.S. about regional policy-making and UC faculty Dept. of Energy, the U.S. Dept. of State, the U.S. learn about the role of technology in building Dept. of Defense, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the regional peace. In 2001–2002, IGCC has teamed Japan–U.S. Friendship Commission, Japan’s with Livermore and Los Alamos National National Institute for Research Advancement Laboratories to develop a long-term program (NIRA), and the Canadian Centre for Foreign for training the next generation of Ph. D. stu- Policy Development. Important foundation sup- dents in Nuclear Weapons and Public Policy. port has come from the John D. and Catherine T. The events of 11 September 2001 have reinforced MacArthur Foundation, the William and Flora our joint commitment to this program.
5 Internal Conflict Blurb.
Last October, the UCSD Representative Assembly voted overwhelmingly to accept the Department’s proposal to reorganize into a Division of Biology
6 6 6 Contents Research Initiatives
IGCC IS A NATIONAL LEADER in reframing the research program has diversified to encom- dimensions of traditional security studies pass several broad areas of inquiry: regional and pioneering innovations in international relations, international environmental policy, cooperation. During IGCC’s first five years internal conflicts, and the proliferation of (1983–88), research focused largely on avert- weapons of mass destruction. Most recently, ing nuclear war through arms control and researchers have examined the role of infor- confidence-building measures between mation technology in economic globalization the superpowers. Since then, the and multinational cooperative regimes.
Innovations in International Cooperation 9 The Great Silk Road Survey 9 Globalization and Governance 10 Global Partnership in Primary Care Innovation 11 Governing the Global E-conomy 12 Governing the Global Network 14 Wired for Peace: Virtual Diplomacy in Northeast Asia 15
International Security Policy 17 The New Nuclear Agenda 18 Strategic Weapons Proliferation 19 Symposium in Honor of Herbert York 20 Arms Control and Security Improvements in the Middle East 21
International Dimensions of Domestic Conflict and 23 Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy Powersharing and Peacemaking: Conditions for Success in Ethnically Divided Societies 24 Holding China Together 25
International Environmental Policy 27 New Directions for International Environmental Policy 29 Transboundary Environmental Management 30 Revelle Program on Climate Science and Policy 31
Regional Relations 33 The Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue 33 Track-One Diplomacy in Northeast Asia 34 Building the APEC International Assessment Network (APIAN) 36 A New Emphasis on Europe 37
Campus Programs 39 Fellowships and Grants 39 Dissertation Fellows 40 Internships 43 Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops 44
For more detail on any program, see IGCCOnline at
7 8 8 Research Initiatives Innovations in International Cooperation
Caspian oil and gas pipelines lie at the heart of multi- national policies aimed at Eurasian re-integration. Transit fees promise revival of regional economies, hearkening to a shared heritage of trade and prosperity along the Great Silk Routes of antiquity.
SINCE ITS INCEPTION, IGCC and its partners have been committed to conflict resolu- tion through international cooperation. By supporting research from a multi- disciplinary platform, IGCC has been on the front line of many innovative solutions in international problem solving.
The Great Silk Road Survey
MULTINATIONAL ACCORDS to construct Caspian vened a La Jolla planning workshop, fol- Sea oil and gas export pipelines over a 1,100- lowed by an international plenary co-hosted mile route from Baku, Azerbaijan, through by the Middle East Technical University the Republic of Georgia, to Mediterranean Center for the Study of Historical Environ- tanker ports in Turkey have been lauded as ments (TAÇDAM) in Ankara, Turkey, in June successes in “pipeline diplomacy.” “Baku- 2001. Participants agreed on collaborative Tbilisi-Ceyhan” aims to spur economic devel- frameworks and assessed technical capacities opment along the western leg of the ancient and standards. Pipeline operator British Pet- trade route known as the Great Silk Road. roleum then conducted a preliminary archae- The resources mobilized for pipeline con- ological survey along the BTC route. In struction make possible the collection and September 2001, a GSRS team including sen- sharing of data of inestimable value to local ior archaeologists from the Azerbaijan and and international development planners. Georgia National Academies of Science visit- IGCC is assembling experts from the oil ed field locations, assessed local needs, and industry, international lending institutions, made formal proposals for support. and the archaeological, remote sensing, Through 2002, the Great Silk Road Survey telecommunications, informatics, and geolog- will help national facilities and museums ical communities to capitalize upon this build local capacity to curate “digital jour- opportunity. Expert discussion and field tests neys” showing the connections of local arti- have opened local, national, regional, and facts and landscapes to regional climate and international conversations relating the Great culture along the BTC transect. A regional vis- Silk Road of the past to the energy, trans- ualization center will help development plan- portation, and telecommunications projects of ners anticipate seismic risks, assess climatic the future. Best practices for knowledge shar- impacts, and understand the policy implica- ing are being written into workable, reusable tions of geosciences assessments. For illustrat- protocols for regional capacity-building—an ed reports and press releases, see
GLOBALIZATION IS The volume focuses on a central aspect of glob- OFTEN DEFINED EX- alization, economic integration at the global PANSIVELY as net- level. The reduction of barriers to economic works of inter- exchange and factor mobility is gradually creat- dependence that ing one economic space from many, although span interconti- that process is far from complete. In turn, impor- nental distances. tant shifts in governance have occurred in all As such, the term three directions: upward to the supranational incorporates a level, downward to the subnational level, and David LAKE (l.) host of profound changes in world politics: laterally to the realm of private actors. However, and Miles growing political linkages at the global level, these trends are neither universal nor uniform. The papers document these profound changes KAHLER (r.) erosion of local space and time as structures of economic life, and homogenization of social life in governance and explore their causes. In doing Photo: Maissa Sanders through global standards, products, and culture. so, the authors adopt an explicitly actor-oriented A two-year project to explore these profound political theory of globalization. Rather than see- changes, led by professors David A. Lake and ing globalization as an inexorable and imper- Miles Kahler (UCSD), has resulted in a soon-to- sonal set of market forces, the authors empha- be-published volume, Globalizing Authority: size how globalization changes the preferences Economic Integration and Governance. The intro- of some actors, increases the bargaining power ductory and concluding chapters and the com- of others, and opens new institutional options plete table of contents can be found at for still others. In this way, they reintroduce
10 Innovations in International Cooperation Global Partnership in Primary Care Innovation
REPRESENTATIVES FROM UC SAN FRANCISCO, help students understand and integrate differ- China, Cuba, South Africa, Thailand, and the ent models of primary care through internation- United Kingdom met in San Francisco 10–17 al experience. They envision a curriculum that November 2001 to define the vision and the emphasizes and facilitates the development of goals of a new program, the Global Partnership appropriate and innovative modes of primary in Primary Care Innovation (GPPCI). The part- care in various settings, communities, and soci- nership seeks to enhance general health and eties. The partners see research regarding the well-being through the development of pri- delivery of cost-effective family care as a neces- mary-care professional education programs. sity, as is developing a web-based teaching Co-sponsors of the conference included the package through which the public and medical Schools of Medicine and Nursing at UC San professionals can research available primary- Francisco, the Office of the Vice Chancellor, care courses, personnel, and methods. Administration and Finance, UC San Francisco, UC San Francisco will serve as the hub and the Center for Health and Community. through which bilateral exchanges with each Several other departments at UC San Francisco partner and the program’s administration takes are also actively involved, including Family and place. The six international partners hope that Community Medicine, Community Health through their long-term collaboration they will Systems, and Anthropology, History, and Social be able to encourage the creation of innovative, Medicine. high-quality, primary care-oriented nursing and GPPCI’s aims were conceptualized in three medical educational programs. broad areas: faculty and staff development, GPPCI members will meet again next year to teaching and learning development, and knowl- assess their progress. For further information on edge development. The partners expressed the the project, please contact Dr. Peter Lovett at importance of creating an international faculty [email protected] or Christie Kiefer at and staff base. They also recognize the need to [email protected].
UC San Francisco, 10–17 November 2001 GPPCI PARTICIPANTS Dr. Thomas L. HALL, School of Prof. Kobkul PHANCHARO- UC San Francisco Medicine, UC San Francisco ENWORUKUL, School of Nursing Students Ron BEE, IGCC William HOLZEMER, School of Nursing, Mahidol University, Leslie CRAIGIN Haile DEBAS, Dean, School of Nursing, UC San Francisco Bangkok Medicine, UC San Francisco Teri LINDGREN Susan JANSON, School of Dr. Sampol PONGTHAI, Kathleen DRACUP, Dean, UC San Francisco Nursing, UC San Francisco School of Medicine, Mahidol School of Nursing, UC San University, Bangkok Medical Students Christie KIEFER, Dept. of Francisco Linda CHANG Anthropology, History, and Dr. Julio Antonio Portal Vari DRENNAN, Dept. of Social Medicine, UC San PINEDA, Ministry of Public Justin DAVIS Primary Care and Population Francisco Health, Cuba Abigail Dorit HANKIN Sciences, Royal Free and Dr. Jonathan RODNICK University College Medical Dr. Barry KISTNASAMY, Maya DULAY School of Medicine School, London Nelson Mandela School of Rheinila FERNANDES Medicine, University of Natal, UC San Francisco Dr. Sue FU, Capitol University, Dana FUCHS Durban, South Africa Dr. Leana UYS, School of Beijing Gary R. HENSLEY Dr. Peter LOVETT, School of Nursing, University of Natal, Claire GOODMAN, Dept. of Dustin MARK Medicine, UC San Francisco Durban, South Africa Primary Care and Population Dr. Suriya WONGKONG- Christina MILANO Sciences, Royal Free and Jeremiah MOCK , School of KATHEP, Institute for Health Ying PAN University College Medical Medicine, UC San Francisco Manpower Development, School, London Dr. Elizabeth MURRAY, Dept. Lisa QUINONES Bangkok Prof. Guifang GUO, Dept. of of Primary Care and Population Karen SKJEI Nursing-Related Humanities, Sciences, Royal Free and Ali ZAIDI Beijing University, Bejing University College Medical Hui ZHANG School, London 11 Innovations in International Cooperation Governing the Global E-conomy
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALI-FOR- tors, hearing instruments, food, textiles, and NIA E-CONOMY PROJECT is a trucking. collaborative undertaking of A collaborative research meeting on wireless IGCC, the Berkeley Round- technology was held 10 December 2001 at UC table on the International Berkeley. Participants from the Research Economy (BRIE), the Califor- Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA) and nia Institute for Telecommu- the E-conomy Project discussed the evolution of nications and Information broadband access and mobile internets, open Technology at UC San Diego standards versus proprietary standards, the next and UC Irvine, and a number generation of network technology and how it of units at the University of will be regulated, and the macroeconomic impli- California, Berkeley, includ- cations of the “new economy.” The meeting John ZYSMAN ing the College of Engineer- ended with an open session on how to better ing, the Haas School of carry out comparative work. A follow-up meet- Business, and the School of Information ing was hosted by the European Commission in Management and Systems (SIMS). Participating Brussels on 1 February 2002. The E-conomy faculty represent a broad interdisciplinary range Project will co-sponsor its first Workshop on of UC Berkeley departments as well as faculty Spectrum Allocation and Assignment 12–14 from UC campuses at Davis, Irvine, Los May 2002 at UC San Diego. Angeles, and Santa Barbara. The project fuses For more information on the E-conomy these academics’ research agendas with the Project, visit the project web site at
12 Berkeley, California, 10 December 2001 ETLA-BRIE Collaborative Research Meeting
WELCOME Jonathan ARONSON (USC) Peter COWHEY Director Prof. John ZYSMAN (BRIE) Michael KLEEMAN (Catenas) IGCC Pekka YLÄ-ANTTILA (ETLA) Session IV: Organization Brad DELONG and Management of Dept. of Economics UC Berkeley SESSION CHAIRS Production and R&D Laura PAIJA (ETLA) Martin KENNEY Steve COHEN (BRIE) Management of Strategic Dept. of Human and Jay STOWSKY (BRIE) Partnerships with Technology Community Development John ZYSMAN (BRIE) Suppliers UC Davis Martin KENNEY (UC Davis) Michael KLEEMAN The Evolving E-conomy: Catenas Where to Start the Policy, Governance, and Heli KOSKI Conversation—From Strategy ETLA “Net95” to the Broadband John CIOFFI (UC Riverside) Aija LEIPONEN and Mobile Internet(s) Jonathan SALLET ETLA François BAR (Stanford U.) (Quintessence, LLC) Laura PAIJA ETLA Peter COWHEY (IGCC) Steve WEBER (BRIE) John ZYSMAN (BRIE) Petri ROUVINEN Macroeconomics and ETLA Productivity in the “New Jonathan SALLET Economy” PARTICIPANTS Quintessence, LLC Petri ROUVINEN (ETLA) Jonathan ARONSON Jay STOWSKY Haas School of Business Steve COHEN (BRIE) Director, School of UC Berkeley Brad DELONG (UC Berkeley) International Relations USC Steve WEBER Next Generation Network François BAR Dept. of Political Science UC Berkeley Technology and Dept. of Communication Pekka YLÄ-ANTTILA Regulation Stanford University ETLA Heli KOSKI (ETLA) John CIOFFI John ZYSMAN Diffusion of Mobile Dept. of Political Science Dept. of Political Science Communication Technologies UC Riverside UC Berkeley Aija LEIPONEN (ETLA) Steve COHEN Organization of Standard Setting: Dept. of Regional Planning A Strategic Perspective UC Berkeley
13 Innovations in International Cooperation Governing the Global Network: International Workshops on Communication Regulation
MANY DEVELOPING COUN- International Affairs (APSIA) for 1998. An expert on TRIES are introducing gen- international trade and monetary relations and inter- eral competition as the national communications policy, Aronson is the new way of organizing author or co-author of Managing the World Economy: The Consequences of Corporate Alliances, (with P. their national communi- Cowhey, Council on Foreign Relations), Changing cations industries. This Networks: Mexico’s Telecommunications Options (UCSD), transformation has pro- When Countries Talk: International Trade in Telecommuni- duced numerous benefits, cations Services (with P. Cowhey, Ballinger), Trade Talks: including faster network America Better Listen! (Council on Foreign Relations), build-out and better serv- and Money and Power: Banks and the World Monetary ice. It is commonly argued, System (Sage). Most recently, he was the primary con- however, that it takes tributor to the report on “Protecting International Jonathan ARONSON sound competition and Intellectual Property,” published by the Pacific Council on International Policy at USC. Prof. Aronson Photo: Staff regulatory policies to received his undergraduate degree from Harvard deliver strong benefits to University and his graduate training in political sci- society. As the UN Development Program has ence and economics at Stanford University. He is a pointed out, getting these policies right is impor- member of the Council on Foreign Relations. tant for development policy. To aid these efforts, IGCC’s E-conomy Project Peter F. COWHEY was named IGCC director 1 July and the Annenberg Center for Communications 2000 after serving as acting director. Cowhey holds a at the University of Southern California in 2000 joint appointment and is a professor of political science established an annual Workshop on Communi- at the Graduate School of International Relations and cations Regulation. The workshops harness the Pacific Studies (IR/PS), UC San Diego. His major convening power of the university to the analyt- fields of research are international political economy, ic skills of its faculty to assist policymakers. The comparative foreign policy, and international relations communications regulators of three developing theory. In 1994 Prof. Cowhey took leave from UC San Diego to join the Federal Communications Commis- countries are invited to present in depth one of sion. In 1997 he became the Chief of the International their hardest policy challenges. A team of schol- Bureau of the FCC, where he was in charge of all poli- ars and other industry experts then provides cy and licensing for international telecommunications advice as to the “best practices” for solving the services, including all satellite issues and licensing for problem. Mixing senior regulators and leading the FCC. Prior to becoming Bureau Chief he was the analysts from several countries assures a blend Commission’s Senior Counselor for International of realism and imagination while drawing on Economic and Competition Policy. His current diverse national experiences. research includes the political determinants of foreign Led by Profs. Peter Cowhey and Jonathan policy, the reorganization of the global communica- Aronson, this year’s workshop, held at USC on tions and information industries, and the future of for- eign trade and investment rules in the Pacific Rim. His 12–13 January 2001, considered problems extensive research and writings on international involving restructuring the pricing of telephone telecommunications markets and regulation have services, the funding of subsidies for poor been supported by the World Bank, Council on households, and the promotion of telephone Foreign Relations, American Enterprise Institute, the network construction in rural areas. The Markle Brookings Institution, the Markle Foundation, and the Foundation again provided financial support Twentieth Century Fund. His books include The for this meeting. Problems of Plenty: Energy Policy and International Politics; When Countries Talk: International Trade in Jonathan D. ARONSON is director of the School of Telecommunications Services (with J. Aronson); Manag- International Relations and professor in the ing the World Economy: The Consequences of Corporate Annenberg School for Communication at the Alliances (with J. Aronson); and Structure and Policy in University of Southern California. He also was presi- Japan and United States (co-edited with Mathew dent of the Association of Professional Schools of McCubbins).
14 Innovations in International Cooperation Wired for Peace: Virtual Diplomacy in Northeast Asia
WIRED FOR PEACE (W4P)
Los Angeles, California, 12–13 January 2001 International Workshop on Communications Regulation
EXPERT ADVISERS Elizabeth DAILY, Director, Ruth MILKMAN, Lawler, Maissa SANDERS, Conference Annenberg Center for Metzger and Milkman, LLC, Coordinator, IGCC Donald ABELSON, Communication, University of Washington, D.C. International Bureau Chief, Howard SHELANSKI, School Southern California Federal Communications Julia MOFFETT, Markle of Law, UC Berkeley Commission Molly GAVIN, Research Foundation, New York, New Donald STOCKDALE, Director Assistant, IGCC York Rebecca ARBOGAST, Chief, of Research, Federal Telecommunications Division, Michael KATZ, Director, Center Eli NOAM, Columbia Business Communications Commission International Bureau, Federal for Telecommunications and School, Columbia University Thomas SUGRUE, Chief, Communications Commission Digital Convergence, Haas Robert PEPPER, Chief, Office of Wireless Telecommunications School of Business, UC Berkeley Jonathon ARONSON, Director, Plans and Policy, Federal Bureau, Federal Communica- School of International Michael KLEEMAN, Senior Communications Commission, tions Commission Relations, University of Fellow, Berkeley Roundtable on Washington, D.C. Dr. Bjorn WELLENIUS, Southern California the International Economy, UC Gregory ROSSTON, Deputy Consultant, Potomac, Md. Berkeley Martin BEVERSDORF, UC Director, Stanford Institute for Berkeley Karen LYNCH, Markle Economic Policy Research, Foundation, New York, New Stanford University Peter COWHEY, Director, IGCC York
15 From the Director Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation
Last October, the UCSD Representative Assembly voted overwhelmingly to accept the Department’s proposal to reorganize into a Division of Biology
1616 Research Initiatives International Security Policy
SINCE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, American society has sponsored a state- been absorbed by the heinous terrorist plane wide teaching se- attacks against New York and Washington, D.C., minar on the history and an outbreak of anthrax from unknown of strategic weapons sources through our postal system. American proliferation and and allied leaders declared a “new war” to elim- efforts to limit it and inate terrorism at home and abroad. The nation's held an initial meet- immediate goal has been to stop the attacks, root ing of the New out the terrorists, and devise a range of domes- Nuclear Agenda. tic and international measures to protect against These meetings and future terrorist attacks. their teams of partic- The implications of September 11 are still ipants are important unfolding. Many have noted the foreign policy building blocks for realignments, changing domestic and interna- future collaborative tional foreign policy responses, and how those research. After Sep- responses reflect a sea change in world affairs. tember 11, IGCC IGCC and the University of California possess drew on these UC unique interdisciplinary assets to help our stu- personnel to create a dents, faculty, citizens, and policymakers make “toolbox on terror- better sense of what has happened and to ism” that the state inform the important public policy debate that and nation could has evolved since that tragic day. use in response to While we must address these short-term this threat. A Russian soldier loads an SS-19 threats, it is crucial to look at longer-term trends An important strategic missile into a silo at a in international affairs if we are to emerge as part of the New site near Saratov. The role of smarter partners at home and abroad. IGCC has Nuclear Agenda traditional strategic weapons may long studied such trends and identified their is the recognized be lessened as countries seek implications through independent collaborative need to train a new ways to protect themselves from generation of aca- research and track-two regional security dia- chemical and biological threats. logues in the Middle East and Northeast Asia, demics, analysts, AP/Wide World Photo: Str and by providing incentives for faculty and a and experts about new generation of Ph.D. students to conduct weapons of mass policy-oriented work in international affairs. destruction. In that light, IGCC has begun a ded- The mission of IGCC has always been to icated development campaign for a six-year study the causes of conflict and devise options statewide program entitled Nuclear Weapons for resolving it through international coopera- and Public Policy: Training the Next Generation. tion. In 1983, Dr. Herbert York, IGCC’s founder, As part of our evolving international dimen- recognized this need and began marshalling sions of domestic conflict, IGCC has gathered statewide UC interdisciplinary research toward UC political scientists, sociologists, historians, improving our understanding of world affairs lawyers, doctors, and technical experts at the and informing public policy. In 2001, IGCC not national laboratories to examine the domestic only honored Dr. York's career (page 20), but it and international responses to modern terrorism recommitted itself to this important mission. since 1880 for their current and future lessons. Participants in the New Nuclear Agenda (page IGCC also began applying the lessons of its 18), a joint project of IGCC and Lawrence Powersharing and Peacemaking project (page Livermore and Los Alamos National 24) to the war in Afghanistan and potential Laboratories, explored the nonproliferation future third-party interventions. regime, how the end of the Cold War has As this brief summary suggests, IGCC is changed deterrence, and the new roles and adapting its research agenda and assets to threats posed by weapons of mass destruction. address the contemporary issues of internation- Now, more than ever, that exploration is al security policy. 2001 was a turning point in urgently needed. Before September 11, IGCC co- that institutional recommitment.
17 International Security Policy The New Nuclear Agenda
FACULTY AND ASSOCIATES OF IGCC and the ation treaty is that there is no mechanism to deal National Laboratories met to discuss current with states that openly have weapons but are and future strategic relations between states not part of the regime. with nuclear capability at an IGCC-hosted Deterrence is no longer simply a binary phe- nuclear policies workshop 17–18 May 2001. The nomenon. Thinking of states as “deterable” or workshop was co-sponsored by IGCC and the “undeterable” is not as useful as thinking about Lawrence Livermore (LLNL) and Los Alamos deterrence in terms of active competition that (LANL) National Laboratories. may involve military conflict at varying levels. Workshop discussions centered on four main In the case of nuclear conflict, deterrence alone is areas: 1) Strategic relations between Russia, not sufficient protection. Defense is a valuable China, and the United States; 2) the nonprolifer- tool missing from the U.S. tool kit. While missile ation regime; 3) defense and deterrence; and 4) defense may be effective in many scenarios, a the future of nuclear weapons. Participants dis- rogue state may not be held off by missile cussed the changing triangular relationship defense without deterrence. between Russia, China, and the United States, As extremists seek to use nuclear, chemical, agreeing that, with the end of the Cold War, tra- and biological weapons for their own political ditional foreign policy between the states is col- motives, terrorism becomes a new wild card in ored by domestic politics and needs to accom- the security equation. modate other institutions. The chance for nuclear war may be greater The nonproliferation regime may be fraying now than in the days of the Cold War. at the edges. The interests of the great powers Safeguarding problems, especially in Russia; who initially constructed the regime have proliferation in rogue states; build-ups in the changed. Participants remained optimistic, not- newer nuclear weapons states; and the move ing that the lack of a breakout of new aspirants from a bipolar to a multipolar world all present may illustrate the strength of the nonprolifera- complex challenges. Participants concluded tion norm. In many instances, the factors that that the increasing complexities of a post–Cold keep states from obtaining nuclear weapons are War world require a new generation of experts external to the regime. Good statecraft and on nuclear weapons issues. As traditional diplomacy can help to improve cooperation expertise gives way, a new generation of leaders with the regime; globalization and economic must be trained and current leaders must be interdependence may also provide new incen- retrained. tives. An intractable problem in the nonprolifer-
La Jolla, California, 17–18 May 2001 Nuclear Policy Workshop PARTICIPANTS Elaine CHANDLER William CHANDLER, UC San David A. LAKE, Diego UC San Diego LANL Zachary DAVIS Mark DANNER, UC Berkeley Pat MORGAN, UC Irvine Ken APT Larry FERDERBER Doug EARDLEY, UC Santa Robert POWELL, UC Berkeley Kory BUDLONG-SYLVESTER Neil JOECK Barbara Harry RADOUSKY, UC Office Jim DOYLE Ron LEHMAN Christi GILHOI, IGCC of the President Bryan FEAREY Eileen VERGINO Michael INTRILIGATOR, UC Phil ROEDER, UC San Diego Chad OLINGER Other Los Angeles Larisa SATARA, IGCC Joseph PILAT Ruth ADAMS, IGCC Cynthia KAPLAN, UC Santa Susan SHIRK, IGCC Dennis POWELL Tyler ALLEN, IGCC Barbara Etel SOLINGEN, UC Irvine Paul WHITE Lawrence BADASH, UC Santa Barbara KOREMENOS, UC Steve SPIEGEL, UC Los Barbara Los Angeles LLNL Angeles Ronald J. BEE, IGCC Harry KREISLER, UC Berkeley Debbie BALL Herb YORK, IGCC Paul BROWN
18 International Security Policy The History of Strategic Weapons Proliferation and Efforts to Limit It
THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC WEAPONS has changed tion policy. At various points during the work- immensely in the post–Cold War era. With the shop, the large group broke into two smaller focus now on nonproliferation rather than groups and worked on creating a syllabus for a deterrence, policy makers must rely on a new nonproliferation course. The end result was a set of tools and skills. A new generation of poli- compilation of ideas and tools to use in teaching cy practitioners must be trained to fully under- courses in nonproliferation. stand the new implications of strategic The NPEC/IGCC faculty teaching seminar weapons. To help meet this need, the was funded by the United States Institute on Nonproliferation Policy Education Center Peace. For more information and links to (NPEC) and the Institute on Global Conflict and the syllabi resulting from the conference, go to Cooperation (IGCC) held a faculty teaching
La Jolla, California, 11–14 July 2001 History of Strategic Weapons Proliferation
PARTICIPANTS Navneet GREWAL, IGCC Amy SANDS, Monterey Institute for International Michael BARLETTA, Monterey Helen KEARENY Studies Institute for International Jeffrey KNOPF, Naval Studies Postgraduate School, National Larisa SATARA, IGCC Ron BEE, IGCC Security Affairs Department Clifford E. SINGER, U. of Illinois Mark CLARK, California Joshua MURAVCHIK, The State U., San Bernardino American Enterprise Institute Adam STULBERG, Sam Nunn School of International Affairs Zachary DAVIS, LLNL Gordon OEHLER, SAIC Raju THOMAS, Marquette U. Allen GREB, San Diego State Marianne OLIVA, NPEC University David RAPOPORT, UC Los Paul VIOTTI, U. of Denver William GREEN, California Angeles State U., San Bernardino
19 International Security Policy Symposium in Honor of Herbert York
WORLD-RENOWNED NUCLEAR Brown, former secretary of defense, and Michael PHYSICIST Herbert York, UC May, like York, a past director of the Lawrence San Diego’s first Chancellor Livermore National Laboratory. York, who and founder and Director mixed personal anecdotes about each speaker Emeritus of the Institute on with his own analysis and opinions, seemed to Global Conflict and Coopera- enjoy the day. tion (IGCC), was honored As part of the festivities, the creation of two with a campus symposium 2 scholarships in York’s name were announced: November 2001. Chancellor the IGCC Herbert York Fellowship and the Robert Dynes and IGCC Lawrence Livermore Herbert York Postdoctoral Director Peter Cowhey spon- Fellowship. Herbert YORK sored the event to honor York. The IGCC Herbert York Fellowship is intend- Photo: Alan Decker Director Cowhey set the ed to support innovative research on interna- tone in his opening remarks, tional policy issues in natural science, engineer- saying that the day would not ing, or science policy, but also may be awarded be filled with testimonials to an applicant from any discipline with about York but instead would research interests related to the intersection of be a conversation centered on science and international policy. Reflecting Dr. the three themes of York’s York’s distinguished career, there is special inter- public life: building national est in dissertation topics relating to arms control, defense, the evolution of arms but all subjects pertaining to science and inter- control, and the changing role national policy will receive serious considera- of the university in society. tion. Recipients will be invited to spend at least Members of the three panels one quarter at the Lawrence Livermore or Los Harold BROWN included York’s past and pres- Alamos National Laboratories. Photo: Rachel York-Williams ent colleagues, such as Harold (continued on p. 49)
La Jolla, California, 2 November 2001 Symposium in Honor of Herbert York
INTRODUCTION Richard C. ATKINSON, Duane SEWELL, Lawrence Ruth ADAMS, IGCC President, University of Livermore National Laboratory Peter F. COWHEY, Director, UC Peif PANOFSKY California Institute on Global Conflict and Hugh BRADNER, IGPP, Scripps Institution of Third Panel: The Cooperation First Panel: Building OCeanography Changing Role of the REMARKS National Defense: From University in Society the Manhattan Project to Second Panel: The Mark THIEMENS, Dean of Robert C. DYNES, Chancellor, National Missile Defense Evolution of International Physical Sciences Division, UC UC San Diego Michael M. MAY, Center for Arms Control San Diego Michael M. MAY, Director International Security and Etel SOLINGEN, Dept. of Jim ARNOLD, Chemistry Emeritus, Lawrence Livermore Arms, Stanford University Political Science, UC Irvine Dept., UC San Diego National Laboratory Harold BROWN, Center for George RATHJENS, Center for Merf GOLDBERGER, Dean, Richard L. GARWIN, IBM Strategic International Studies International Studies, Natural Sciences Dept., UC San Fellow Emeritus, Thomas J. Sandy LAKOFF, Dept. of Massachusetts Institute of Diego Watson Research Center Political Science, UCSD Technology Andy VITERBI Susan L. SHIRK, Research Susan SHIRK, UC Institute on Stan SHEINBAUM, Publisher, Director, UC Institute on Global Global Conflict and New Perspectives Quarterly Conflict and Cooperation Cooperation Rachel YORK-WILLIAMS, Daughter
20 International Security Policy Arms Control and Security Improvement in the Middle East
THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS suffered a num- process. His publications include The ber of serious setbacks in 2001. It becomes even Arab-Israeli Search for Peace (ed., more important, therefore, that university-based Rienner, 1992), Conflict Management in institutes such as IGCC help keep the dialogue the Middle East (ed., Westview, 1992), the award-winning The Other Arab- going between adversaries. IGCC has been Israeli Conflict: Making America’s engaged in brokering such discussions since the Middle East Policy from Truman to mid-1980s and currently provides funding from Reagan (U. Chicago Press, 1995), government sources for a range of Middle East World Politics in a New Era (Harcourt Dialogues. Led by Steven Spiegel (UC Los Brace College, 1995), and The Dyna- Angeles), six “track-two,” off-the-record dia- mics of Middle East Nuclear Proliferation logues take place annually. IGCC administers (ed., with J. Kibbe and E. Matthews, Arms Control and Security Improvements in the Edwin Mellen , 2001). His classic book Middle East, whereby civil and military leaders of U.S. foreign policy readings, At Anthony CORDESMAN meet quietly in a collegial setting to discuss spe- Issue: Politics in the World Arena, is in Photo: Maissa Sanders its seventh edition (St. Martin’s, 1994). cific options for improving regional security relations. Recent seminars included participants Anthony CORDESMAN joined the Center for from twenty-two countries, including Israelis, Strategic and International Studies from Senator John Palestinians, Turks, and key Arab states. McCain’s office, where he served as assistant for Discussion issues have included the security national security. He is also an adjunct professor of concerns of individual states, the Israeli- security studies at Georgetown University and a mili- Palestinian peace process, work on regional mil- tary analyst for ABC. He has held senior positions in itary codes of conduct, and the war on terrorism. the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the State Formerly funded by the U.S. Departments of Department, the Department of Energy, and the Energy and State, all Middle East Dialogues are Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. His now funded by Congress through the U.S. most recent books include The Arab-Israeli Military Department of Defense. Balance and the Middle East Peace Process (Westview, 1996), Iran’s Military Forces in Transition (Praeger, 1996), It is worth noting that the goodwill built and Iraq and the War of Sanctions (Praeger, 1999). He is through these dialogues was not destroyed by author/coauthor of the series CSIS Middle East the events of 11 September nor the ongoing strife Dynamic Net Assessment (Westview, 1997). He was for- in the Middle East. In fact, in an October 2001 merly the international editor of the Armed Forces session, participants crafted a unanimous state- Journal and U.S. editor of Armed Forces (UK). ment that included the following language: “The Indiscriminate and deliberate targeting of General Anthony C. ZINNI, US Marine Corp., Ret., civilians with a view to causing mass casualties, has had a long and distinguished military career. Gen. for whatever ideological, political, religious, or Zinni joined the Marine Corps in 1961 and was com- other justification, as was the case on September missioned an infantry second lieutenant in 1965 upon 11, 2001 in the United States, is considered ter- graduation from Villanova University. He held rorism to be clearly and unequivocally con- numerous command and staff assignments and was also a tactics and operations instructor at several Ma- demned.” IGCC hopes to carry the same spirit rine Corps schools and colleges. His operational expe- of cooperation forward in its future dialogues. riences include two tours in Vietnam, operations in the For background information on IGCC’s Philippines, Africa, and the Persian Gulf, and past multilateral arms control efforts in the Operation Infinite Reach against terrorist targets in the Middle East, visit
Research Initiatives International Dimensions of Domestic Conflict and Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy
Workers transfer an aid shipment bound for Afghanistan from a cargo plane 6 October 2001. The power vaccum created by the removal of the Taliban from power may lead to increased ethnic strife in an already troubled area. AP/World Wide Photo: Vahid Salemi
ETHNIC CONFLICT, traditionally regarded This work focused attention on concrete as a domestic problem, rapidly became aspects of the interrelationships between a serious international security domestic and foreign policies, and internal issue in the aftermath of the conflicts with real potential for spreading Cold War. As a bipolar world across international boundaries or otherwise devolved into a multipolar one, five par- commanding international attention. Parti- ticular regions displayed heightened cularly fruitful in cases with high potential ethnic schisms and transnational con- for international repercussions are investiga- flicts: Eastern Europe, Africa, the former tions of effective institutions for managing Soviet Union, the Middle East, and South and terminating volatile civil conflicts; effec- Asia. The International Spread and Manage- tive regulatory policies for managing interna- ment of Ethnic Conflict, a landmark project tional refugee and labor migration; and directed by Prof. David Lake (UC San Diego) assessments of global economic restructuring and Prof. Donald Rothchild (UC Davis) impacts on internal institutional reforms. slashed through a decade of muddy thinking IGCC continued to build on this line of to determine concrete conditions for the research in 2001. Prof. Rothchild teamed with spread and management of ethnic conflict. Prof. Phil Roeder (UC San Diego) to assess Their findings were published as The conditions for success in ethnically divided International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, societies. Barry Naughton (UC San Diego) Diffusion, and Escalation (Princeton U. Press, concluded his multi-year study of China and 1998). its provinces and presented his findings in Washington, D.C.
23 Int’l Dimensions and Domestic Sources Powersharing and Peacemaking: Conditions for Success in Ethnically Divided Societies
IN THE EARLY 1990S, tlements for civil wars and on the international IGCC recognized that spread and management of ethnic conflict. ethnic conflicts have Following up on last year’s successful project become increasingly workshop, participants met again 7–8 December serious international 2001 for two days of presentations and discus- security issues, espe- sion. The project is led by Prof. Philip G. Roeder cially in Africa, Eas- (UC San Diego), a specialist in the politics of tern Europe, Central Soviet successor states, and Prof. Donald and South Asia, and Rothchild (UC Davis), an expert in the field of Don ROTHCHILD (l.) and Philip the Middle East. Dem- ethnic conflict and conflict management in ROEDER (r.) ocratic powersharing Africa. It is funded by the Carnegie Corporation Photo: Maissa Sanders has often been a pre- of New York. ferred solution in the settlement of such con- flicts. However, the strategic problems of gover- Philip G. ROEDER is an associate professor of politi- nance, third-party interpretation, and credible cal science at UC San Diego. His research encompass- commitment in the aftermath of civil wars make es authoritarian politics and comparative ethnic poli- powersharing schemes difficult to maintain. As tics, especially in the Soviet successor states. He is the a consequence, such political arrangements can author of Red Sunset: The Failure of Soviet Politics (Princeton U. Press, 1993), and Soviet Political Dynamics prove a highly unstable basis for durable peace (HarperCollins, 1988). His articles have appeared in in multi-ethnic societies. American Political Science Review, World Politics, and IGCC’s Powersharing and Peacemaking proj- International Studies Quarterly. ect compares successful and failed experiments in ethnic powersharing and examines under Donald ROTHCHILD is professor of political science what conditions such institutional arrange- at UC Davis. His recent works include Managing ments might be appropriate. Case studies Ethnic Conflict in Africa: Pressures and Incentives for include work on decentralization, electoral sys- Cooperation (Brookings, 1997), and The International tems, federalism and fiscal distributions in Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation India, Russia, Eastern Europe, and Ethiopia, and (Princeton U. Press, 1998), co-edited with David Lake. two large-N studies on the effectiveness of pow- His new book, Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of ersharing alternatives. This research agenda Peace Agreements, coauthored with Stephen John Stedman and Elizabeth Cousens, is scheduled for pub- builds on past IGCC work on durable peace set- lication later this year.
La Jolla, California 7–8 December 2001 Powersharing and Peacemaking
PARTICIPANTS Maureen FEELEY, Dept. of Stephanie MCWHORTER, Daniel TREISMAN, Dept. of Political Science, UC San Diego Dept. of Political Science, UC Political Science, UC Los Amit AHUJA, Dept. of Political San Diego Angeles Science, University of Michigan Caroline HARTZELL, Dept. of Political Science, Gettysburg Ben REILLY, National Center Ashutosh VARSHNEY, Dept. Eduardo ALEMAN, Dept. of College for Development Studies, ANU of Political Science, University Political Science, UC Los of Michigan Angeles Matthew HODDIE, Dept. of Phil ROEDER, Dept. of Political Political Science, Texas A&M Science, UC San Diego Stephen WATTS, Dept. of Mikhail ALEXSEEV, Dept. of University Government, Cornell University Political Science, San Diego Donald ROTHCHILD, Dept. of State University Edmond KELLER, Dept. of Political Science, UC Davis Peter YORK, Dept. of Political Political Science, UC Los Science, UC San Diego Ronald J. BEE, IGCC Lahra SMITH, Dept. of Political Angeles Science, UC Los Angeles Marie-Joelle ZAHAR, Dept. of Valerie BUNCE, Dept. of David A. LAKE, Dept. of Political Science, University of Government, Cornell University Christoph STEFES, Graduate Political Science, UC San Diego School of International Studies, Montreal University of Denver
24 Int’l Dimensions and Domestic Sources Holding China Together: The Center, the Provinces, and the Future
PROFESSOR BARRY NAUGHTON of the Graduate served as discussant, noting the School of International Relations and Pacific importance of the study for those Studies (IR/PS), UC San Diego, and Professor seeking to understand recent Dali Yang, University of Chicago, briefed repre- internal developments in China, sentatives from the NSC, Congressional staff, and acted a moderator for the the Departments of State, Treasury, Defense, and ensuing discussion. Agriculture, the CIA, and a number of universi- ties and think tanks on their current work on Barry NAUGHTON is professor of China. Their exhaustive, four-year investigation Chinese economy and Sokwanlok into the evolving relationship between China’s Chair in Chinese International Affairs central authorities and its regional and local at the Graduate School of Inter- power centers was funded by the Smith national Relations and Pacific Studies (IR/PS), UC San Diego. An authority Richardson Foundation. The event was hosted on the Chinese economy, his recent Barry NAUGHTON by the IGCC Washington, D.C., office. research focuses on regional economic growth in the Professors Naughton and Yang described People's Republic of China and the relationship how, after a decade of decentralization and frag- between foreign trade and investment and regional mentation, China’s center restored its capacity in growth. His book, Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese the 1990s. Naughton and Yang analyzed how Economic Reform, 1978–1993, received the Ohira the center’s restoration manifested itself and Memorial Prize in 1996. Naughton is the author of what its implications were for future develop- numerous articles on the Chinese economy and is edi- ments of China’s political organization, econo- tor or co-editor of Reforming Asian Socialism: The my, and its implementation of WTO commit- Growth of Market Institutions, Urban Spaces in Contemporary China, and The China Circle: Economics ments. IGCC Research Director Susan Shirk and Technology in the PRC, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.
Washington, D. C., 26 March 2001 Holding China Together
PARTICIPANTS Stanley CROCK, Business Week Dale KENT, UC Riverside Steve SCHLAIJKER, POLAD, Chief of Naval Operations Somwaru AGAPI, U.S. Dept. of Dennis CULKIN, Ind. Dr. Y LEE, TECRO Agriculture, ERS Consultant Chris LEGOFF, Office of David SEDNEY, State Dept., EAP/CM Michael ALDER Kerry DUMBAUGH, Senator Snowe American Enterprise Institute Congressional Research Service Deborah LEHR, Mayer, Platt, Michael SHARDING, Japan Embassy Michael ALLEN, Brookings Amb. H. FELDMAN, Heritage Brown Institution Foundation Bryan LOHMAR, U.S. Dept. of Susan SHIRK, IGCC Hiroyanu ANDO, Minister, David FINKELSTEIN, CNA Agriculture, ERS Hope STEWART, Asia Embassy of Japan Corp. Project Asia Joseph MCGHEE, IGCC Foundation Dean ARKEMA, Ind. Fred GALE, U.S. Dept.of Washington, D.C. Benjamin TSAI Consultant Agriculture, ERS Emily METZGAR, U.S. Honying WANG, George Ronald BEE, IGCC Lin GANG, Woodrow Wilson Institute for Peace Washington U. Center Larry BERMAN, UC Rebecca MORTER, American Jacqueline A. WILLIS, Hong Washington Center Richard GARBACCIO, EPA Bankers Assoc. Kong Trade Commission Richard BUSH, American Jim HANSEN, U.S. Dept. of Barry NAUGHTON, IR/PS, Dali YANG, U. of Chicago Institute for Taiwan Agriculture, ERS UC San Diego Yiping YANG, China Institute David CLINGAMAN, World Prof. Harry HARDING, George Susan O’SULLIVAN, State of Contemporary International Bank Washington U. Dept., DRL Relations Anna CORFIELD, Treasury Paul HEER, Ind. Consultant Donald ROTHCHILD, UC Diao XINSHEN, IFPRI Dept. Kenneth JARRETT, NSC Davis Wang ZHI, U.S. Dept of Deborah CRANE, Treasury James Gan JIN, Atlantic Lee SANDS, Mayer, Platt, Agriculture Dept. Institute Brown
25
Research Initiatives International Environmental Policy
The 5 February 2001 opening session of a week-long UN meeting in Nairobi addressing the effects of global warming and other environmental threats. The meeting was attended by policy planners and environment ministers from all around the globe. AP Photo/Jean-Marc Bouju
AS UNDERSTANDING OF GLOBAL research includes analyses of the interplay environmental degradation and among international lending practices, trade the transboundary effects of agreements, and environmental/health con- environmental pollution grew cerns. IGCC supports international environ- throughout the 1990s, IGCC ini- mental policy research with conference tiated a research program in international grants, research grants to faculty members, environmental policy to respond to the need dissertation fellowships, and internships in for greater scholarly and policy attention to Washington, D.C. In January 2000 the UC these issues. This program seeks to promote Revelle Program on Climate Science and multinational policy cooperation on global Policy was established as a joint project problems of climate change, biodiversity, between IGCC, the Scripps Institution of ozone depletion, and deforestation, and Oceanography, and the Graduate School of regional issues of pollution control, resource International Relations and Pacific Studies, management, and restoration of basic agri- UC San Diego. This and other IGCC environ- cultural, environmental, and health services mental initiatives are described on pages after military conflict. The scope of IGCC’s 28–31.
27 International Environmental Policy New Directions for International Environmental Policy
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRON- is affiliated with the World Bank and the United MENTAL ISSUES have Nations, promotes international cooperation in become leading features the financing of globally important environmen- of the political and diplo- tal resources in developing countries. Fieldwork matic landscape. Presi- for the project will be conducted in Malaysia dents and prime minis- and will involve a mix of ecologists, anthropolo- ters now discuss, and gists, and economists. A second forest-related disagree about, global study will examine illegal activities in the tropi- climate change. Environ- cal timber sector, which contribute to conflicts mental standards are a over the use of tropical forests. That project will frequent source of trade also be multidisciplinary, with political scientists disputes and a stum- and legal scholars playing especially important Jeff VINCENT bling block for economic roles. Photo: Paula Cichocka integration. Conflicts over Training activities will be aimed at multiple control of natural re- levels. Funds are being sought for extended sources complicate efforts to promote stability in internships that will place graduate students in Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and other leading agencies that are dealing with interna- troubled regions of the world. tional environmental issues and will support the IGCC’s International Environment Program preparation of case materials that will bring the seeks to improve our understanding of peaceful lessons of the interns’ experience into the class- means of resolving such issues. It pays particu- room. Executive training programs on skills for lar attention to the role of developing countries. resolving international environmental disputes Negotiations of international environmental are being developed in cooperation with the agreements are typically marked by sharp dif- University of California’s Washington Center. ferences between the positions of developed and IGCC also plans to assist the newly established developing countries. A better understanding of Center for Environmental Economics and Policy the factors that shape developing countries’ per- in Africa, which provides Master’s-level training ceptions of environmental problems will for individuals interested in addressing Africa’s enhance international cooperation to address numerous transboundary natural resource man- those problems. agement problems. The International Environment Program is led by Jeffrey R. Vincent, who became IGCC’s Jeffrey R. VINCENT is professor of environmental environmental research director in July 2001. and resource economics in the Graduate School of Vincent’s plan International Relations and Pacific Studies (IR/PS), A better understanding of the for the Interna- UC San Diego. Before joining IGCC and IR/PS, he factors that shape developing tional Environ- served for a decade at Harvard University’s Institute countries’ perceptions of ment Program for International Development, where he led research includes a mix and technical assistance projects funded by the World environmental problems will of research and Bank, Asian Development Bank, USAID, the United Nations, and other international organizations. His enhance international training projects. research focuses on natural resource and environmen- cooperation to address Farthest along is tal management in developing countries, especially those problems. a study that will ones in Asia. He is lead author of Environment and help the Global Development in a Resource-Rich Economy: Malaysia Environment Facility (GEF) develop improved Under the New Economic Policy (Harvard Studies in methods for assessing and valuing biological International Development, 1997) and co-editor of the diversity in tropical rainforests. The GEF, which Handbook of Environmental Economics (forthcoming).
28 International Environmental Policy Transboundary Environmental Management
IGCC BEGAN ITS RESEARCH PROGRAM in interna- Project authors presented drafts of their tional environmental policy in the 1990s in papers at a conference at UC San Diego in April response to a growing need. Climate change on 2001. These will appear in Both Sides of the Border: a global scale, whether warming or cooling, is a Transboundary Environmental Management Issues great concern of scientists and policymakers Facing Mexico and the United States (Kluwer, alike. Most marine resources are held in com- forthcoming April 2002), co-edited by mon, necessitating joint management practices Fernandez and Carson. to avoid the depletion of fisheries and further degradation of aquatic environments. Trans- Linda FERNANDEZ is assistant professor of envir- boundary environmental issues such as restora- onmental and resource economics at UC Riverside. tion of basic agricultural, environmental, and Her research focuses on economic incentives for pub- health services after a military conflict continue lic and private protection of water, aquatic habitat, and to be important in war-torn areas such as other environmental resources. Currently, she con- ducts research on national wetlands policy, incentives Afghanistan, while pollution control, water allo- to manage offshore fisheries in the presence of offshore cation, control of straddling oil fields, and oil mining, cost-benefit analyses of fuel alternatives, wildlife conservation are relevant to researchers and pollution control on international borders such as on both sides of many borders. the U.S.–Mexico border. She received her Ph.D. in An IGCC project headed by Linda Fernandez Environmental Econo-mics from UC Berkeley in 1996. (UC Riverside) and Richard Carson (UC San Diego) examined these border concerns in Richard T. CARSON, Jr., is professor of economics at greater depth. Looking first at what defines a UC San Diego and a senior fellow at the San Diego border community, a group of scholars in the Supercomputer Center. Carson has extensive experi- natural and social sciences, their Mexican col- ence in the assessment of the benefits and costs of leagues, and researchers from several U.S. gov- environmental policies. He has been a consultant to a ernment agencies examined the implications of number of nonprofit organizations and government agencies, including the California Department of Fish two sets of policies on water allocation and and Game, the Electric Power Research Institute, availability, air pollution, transportation, energy, Environment Canada, Interameri-can Development hazardous materials disposal, and habitat pro- Bank, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric tection along the U.S.–Mexico border. The par- Administration, Research Triangle Institute, the ticipation of scholars from both sides of the bor- Resource Assessment Commission (Aus-tralia), U.S. der allowed discussion of a range of timely envi- Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Forest ronmental concerns in the interest of solving Service, and the World Bank. Carson's publications problems cooperatively. It also created a model appear in numerous professional journals and edited for similar collaboration along other boundaries. volumes.
La Jolla, California, April 2001 Transboundary Environmental Management Issues Facing Mexico and the United States
PROJECT Magriet CASWELL, ERS, U.S. Ernesto FRANCO-VIZCAINO, Katherine HANKINS, Udall PARTICIPANTS Dept. of Agriculture Institute of Earth Systems Center for Studies in Public Peter DUTTON, Sea Turtle Science, CSU Monterey Bay Policy, U. of Arizona United States Research Program, Southwest George FRISVOLD, Dept. of Richard HALVEY, Senior Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Agricultural and Resource Researcher, Western Governor’s Jim BOOKER, College of Linda FERNANDEZ, Dept. of Economics, U. of Arizona Association Business, Alfred University Environmental Sciences , UC Chris GIANOS, Marshall Carlos Velez IBANEZ, Dept. of Richard CARSON, Dept. of Riverside Business School, USC Anthropology, UC Riverside Economics, UC San Diego continued on p. 31
29 International Environmental Policy University of California Revelle Program on Climate Science and Policy
SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANO- questions freely. Some of the topics discussed GRAPHY (SIO), the Institute on included the linkage between air quality and Global Conflict and Coopera- global warming, environmental economics, pol- tion (IGCC), and the UC San icy approaches, industry perspectives, and the Diego Graduate School of interaction of science and policy. Overall, there International Relations/Pacific was much positive interaction between the sci- Studies (IR/PS) established the entific and policy communities. UC Revelle Program on In support of UCRP’s communications role, Climate Science and Policy Prof. Richard Somerville, scientific co-leader of (UCRP) in January 2000 to the UCRP, and Dr. Lisa Shaffer, the program’s bring together scientists, policy- executive director, appeared on San Diego’s makers, and the private sector public radio station, KPBS, for a call-in show on Lisa SHAFFER to improve communication climate science and policy. In addition, seven Photo: Staff and enhance the impact of nat- graduate students from six UC campuses ural and social science on the received travel support from the UC Revelle issue of global climate change. The program Program to enable them to attend the Fall meet- does not take policy positions or make policy ing of the American Geophysical Union in San recommendations. Rather, it endeavors to iden- Francisco in December 2001. In return for receiv- tify important research in the natural and social ing funding, the students were required to write sciences relevant to policy issues and to make a short report on their experience and what they this knowledge readily available, in an under- learned about how science and policy intersect standable form, to nonscientific audiences. in the context of climate issues. These reports During 2001, the Revelle program conducted were posted on the UCRP web site at two workshops. The first provided an opportu-
30 La Jolla, California, 10–11 September 2001 Regional Air Quality and Global Climate Change
PARTICIPANTS Amb. Mark G. HAMBLEY Prof. Kimberly PRATHER Prof. Mark THIEMENS Shakespear Associates Dept. of Chemistry and Dept. of Chemistry and Ellen BAUM Biochemistry Biochemistry Ecosystem Scientist Dr. James HANSEN UC San Diego UC San Diego Clean Air Task Force NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies Prof. Ronald G. PRINN Prof. Jeffrey R. VINCENT Ronald BEE TEPCA Prof. of Atmospheric IGCC Senior Analyst Dr. John R. HOLMES Chemistry IGCC California EPA Air Resources Prof. Ray WEISS Board Massachusetts Institute of Scripps Institute of Paul BREST Technology Oceanography President Angelica JACOME Prof. V. RAMANATHAN William and Flora Hewlett Attaché to the UN Ministry of Dianne WITTENBERG Victor C. Alderson Prof. and Foundation Foreign Affairs of Panama President Permanent Mission of Panama Director, Center for California Climate Action Chancellor Ralph CICERONE to the UN Atmospheric Sciences Registry UC Irvine Dr. Todd M. JOHNSON Scripps Institute of Dr. Mariana CONTE GRAND STEERING Senior Env. Economist Oceanography Dept. of Economics Environmental Dept. Prof. Kal L. RAUSTIALA COMMITTEE Universidad del CEMA UCLA School of Law The World Bank Prof. Charles KOLSTAD Wenhua DI Prof. Charles KOLSTAD Dr. Lisa SHAFFER Bren School of Environmental Kennedy School of Government Bren School of Environmental Director, Policy Programs and Science and Management Harvard University Science and Management International Relations UC Santa Barbara Dr. Pierre H. DUVAIR Scripps Institute of UC Santa Barbara Prof. Richard SOMERVILLE Global Climate Change Prog. Oceanography Denise MICHELSON Scripps Institute of California Energy Commission Manager Prof. Richard SOMERVILLE Oceanography Dr. Alfonso GARCIA- Scripps Institute of Environmental Programs BP Prof. Jeffrey R. VINCENT GUTIERREZ Oceanography Sec. Mary D. NICHOLS IGCC National Institute of Ecology Dr. Eve S. SPRUNT California Resources Agency Prof. Ray WEISS Dr. Alexander GOLUB Senior Science and Technology William O’KEEFE Scripps Institute of Climate Change Economist Coordinator President Oceanography Environmental Defense George C. Marshall Institute Chevron Corporation Greg GREENWOOD Resources Agency State of California
La Jolla, California, April 2001 Transboundary Environmental Issues Continued from page 29 Helen INGRAM, Dept. of Richard A. MINNICH, Dept. of Roberto SANCHEZ, Dept. of Agricultural Business, New Urban and Regional Planning, Earth Sciences, UC Riverside Environmental Studies, UC Mexico State University UC Irvine Guillermina NUNEZ, Dept. of Santa Cruz Mexico Suzanne LEVESQUE, Anthropology, UC Riverside Gian-Claudia SCIARA, Environmental Health Science Len ORTOLANO, Civil and Transportation and Urban Nicole CARTER, Public and Policy, UC Irvine Environmental Engineering, Planner, New York Administration Division Loretta LYNCH, Dept. of Stanford University Mark SPALDING, IR/PS, UC Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas Agricultural Economics, U. of Martin PASQUALETTI, Dept. San Diego Maryland of Geography, Arizona State U. Dale SQUIRES, Southwest Patricia Romero LANKAO University Autonoma de Phillip MARTIN, Dept. of Carlos RINCON, Senior Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Mexico Agricultural and Resource Researcher, Environmental Robert VARADY, Udall Center Economics, UC Davis Defense Fund for Studies in Public Policy, U. Réne MARQUEZ, INP Mexico Suzanne MICHEL, Institute for Dominic RISSDO, Dept. of of Arizona Laura SARTI, SEMARNAT Regional Studies of the Anthropology, UC Riverside Frank WARD, Dept. of Californias, San Diego State U. Agricultural Economics and
31
Research Initiatives Regional Relations
Workers prepare to destroy a batch of 5,000 drachma banknotes at the Greek National Mint 27 December 2001 in preparation for the adoption of the Euro. Economic integration within and across regions has profound implications for both domestic and international policy. AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis
WITH THE END OF THE COLD WAR, more important since 1989, embedding this regions captured increased atten- trend squarely within international relations tion as primary in the context of theory. The result of this work, Regional Orders: interstate relations. While regions Building Security in a New World (Pennsylvania have always played an important role State U. Press, 1997) helped re-conceptualize in international governance, the demise of the regional relations for international relations bipolar security system raised their profile and scholars, as well as underpin IGCC's policy-ori- importance in both intellectual and policy cir- ented research agenda, including its regionally- cles. IGCC recognized this early on, and helped based track-two programs in North-east Asia shape the comparative study of regional gover- and the Middle East. The events of September nance and a number of activities employing 11, 2001, have served to highlight the impor- regional understandings of conflict and cooper- tance of regional cooperation for conflict pre- ation. It provided support to David Lake (UC vention and resolution, and coordination of San Diego) and Patrick Morgan (UC Irvine) to counter-terrorism initiatives. articulate how and why regions had become Regional Relations The Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue
THE NORTHEAST ASIA COOPERATION DIALOGUE Admiral Dennis Blair, Commander-in-Chief (NEACD) convened its eleventh plenary session of the U.S. Pacific Command (USCINCPAC), set in Honolulu, Hawaii, on 8–9 October 2001 the tone of the conference with a presentation on against the backdrop of the U.S.-led war against Asia-Pacific in the twenty-first century, empha- terrorism. Participants had decided prior to the sizing the importance of developing regional September 11 attacks to discuss enhanced cooperation among militaries and governments. regional cooperation and the role of multilater- Participants then spent two days discussing pos- alism in Northeast Asia, a theme that took on sible methods of regional cooperation with a new pertinence with the start of the “war on ter- sense of great urgency. Japan’s legislation to rorism.” (continued on p. 34)
33 Regional Relations The Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue (continued from p. 33)
expand the role of its Self- Military and defense ministry officials focused Defense Forces to assist the specifically on the military dimension of region- United States in the war against al cooperation and reviewed recent develop- terrorism was an important topic, ments in each state’s military doctrine and strat- as were the lack of progress in egy. Both the plenary session and the Defense rapprochement on the Korean Information Sharing study project agreed to Peninsula, and track-one process meet again in April 2002. The spring meeting possibilities in Northeast Asia. will be held in Japan. Meeting roughly every eight months, NEACD provides a Susan SHIRK, professor of political science at UC San “track-two,” or unofficial, forum Diego and the Graduate School of International Rela- where foreign and defense min- tions and Pacific Studies (IR/PS), was IGCC’s director Susan SHIRK istry policy-level officials, mili- from 1991–97, where she founded the Northeast Asia Photo: Alan Decker tary officers, and academics from Cooperation Dialogue in 1993. From 1997–2000, Shirk served as the deputy assistant secretary for China, China, Russia, North and South Korea, Japan, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, U.S. and the United States are able to meet and Department of State. She then returned to IGCC as frankly discuss regional security issues. research director of Global Security Studies. She is the Founded in 1993, the forum is considered the author of How China Opened Its Door: The Political leading track-two forum in Northeast Asia. At Success of the PRC's Foreign Trade and Investment present there is no official “track-one” multilat- Reforms (Brookings, 1994) and The Political Logic of eral process in Northeast Asia. Economic Reform in China (U. California Press, 1993), In conjunction with the NEACD plenary ses- and the editor of Power and Prosperity: Economic and sion, the ongoing NEACD Defense Information Security Linkages in the Asia Pacific (Transaction Sharing study project convened its fifth meeting Publications, 1996). on 6–7 October (see participants list on page 37).
Regional Relations Track-One Diplomacy in Northeast Asia: An NEACD Study Project
THE NORTHEAST ASIA COOPERATION DIALOGUE breakfast, and then plan further meetings from (NEACD) convened in Seoul in March for a there. Any suggestion for a track-one forum study project on the prospect of an official, track- needs to come from the academics involved, one dialogue process in Northeast Asia. The rather than as a formal government proposal. group, eight academics from Russia, South The establishment of an NEACD track-one Korea, Japan, China, and the United States, dis- process depends on the willingness of North cussed the possibility of such a process and its Korea to participate. potential formats, addressing a variety of struc- The prospect of a track-one process was also tures, appropriate levels of participation, and discussed at the October 2001 NEACD plenary possible agendas. meeting. Academic participants reported on the Two key goals of the discussion were keeping study project, and all participants continued to the program simple and developing a format discuss further how to pursue this goal. Because that North Korea would feel comfortable join- relations between the DPRK, the United States, ing. It was suggested that a new track-one ini- and South Korea had deteriorated in the months tiative could most efficiently begin around an prior to the plenary, NEACD participants recog- already established meeting, such as the ASEAN nized that a track-one process was not likely to Regional Forum. Northeast Asian participants be initiated in the near future. could join for an informal meeting, such as a
34 Honolulu, Hawaii, 8–9 October 2001 NEACD Plenary Session XI
The People’s Republic of Col. Yanagihara TAKASHIGE, Col. Alexander GURVICH, Mr. Ralph COSSA, President, China Deputy Director for Policies, Chief of Branch, Dept. of Pacific Forum, CSIS, Honolulu, Prof. CHU Shulong, Dept. of Joint Staff Office, Japan Defense International Military Hawaii International Studies, Tsinghua Agency, Tokyo Cooperation, Ministry of Observers Defense, Moscow University, Beijing The United States of Tyler ALLEN, Institute on Prof. Vasily MIKHEEV, Deputy Global Conflict and Maj. LI Donglei, Asian Bureau, America Foreign Affairs Office, Ministry Director, Institute for Far Cooperation of National Defense, Beijing Rick DEVILLAFRANCA, Eastern Studies, Moscow Scott DAVIS, Office of Director, Regional and Security LUO Zhaohui, Political Victor TRIVONOV, Principal International Policy Analysis, Policy, East Asian and Pacific Councilor, Asia Dept., Ministry Counselor, Bureau of Asia- Dept. of Energy Affair Bureau, U.S. Dept. of of Foreign Affairs, Beijing Pacific Regional Issues, Ministry Capt. William HICKS, Chief, State of Foreign Affairs, Moscow Prof. SU Ge, Senior Fellow, Regional Engagement Division, Prof. Robert SCALAPINO, China Institute of International USCINCPAC, Camp Smith, Institute of East Asian Studies, The Republic of Korea Studies, Beijing Hawaii UC Berkeley Prof. AHN Byung-Joon, SUN Weidong, First Secretary, JUNG Ga-Yeon, Assistant Prof. Susan SHIRK, Research Political Science Dept., Yonsei Deputy Director, Policy Director, Inter-Korean Policy Director, Institute on Global University, Seoul Planning Division, Asia Dept., Division, Ministry of Foreign Conflict and Cooperation Com. KIM Byeong-Ho, Policy Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Affairs and Trade, Seoul, Korea Officer, Arms Control Bureau, Beijing RADM William SULLIVAN, Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Director, Strategic Planning and Ministry of National Defense, Seoul TOSHIHIRO, J-5 Joint Staff Japan Policy, USCINCPAC Office, Japan Defense Agency, Capt. KWON Byung-Joo, Naval Ishizuka YASUHISA, Dir. of Capt. Kenneth WALKER, Chief, Tokyo, Japan Attaché, Consulate of the Education Division, Person-nel Northeast Asia Branch, Political- OH Gab-Riel, Vice-Consul, and Education Bureau, Japan Military Affairs Directorate, Republic of Korea, Honolulu, Hawaii General, Consulate of the Defense Agency, Tokyo Joint Staff (J-5), Washington, Republic of Korea, Honolulu, PARK Hee-Kwon, Deputy Kikuchi TSUTOMU, Research D.C. Hawaii Fellow, Japan Institute of Director General for Policy The Russian Federation Planning, Ministry of Foreign Mr. Saito KENICHI, Major International Affairs, Tokyo Assistant Director, Foreign Dr. Anatoly BOLYATKO, Affairs and Trade, Seoul Ogawachi TOSHIRO, Senior Policy Bureau, Ministry of Director, Center for Asian- Analyst, Intelligence and Foreign Affairs, Tokyo, Japan Pacific Studies, Institute of Far Special Presenters Analysis Bureau, Ministry of Eastern Studies, Moscow Adm. Dennis BLAIR, Delia STOEHR, Foreign Affairs, Tokyo Commander-in-Chief, U.S. USCINCPAC, Camp Smith, Prof. Tanaka AKIHIKO, Dept. Pacific Command, Camp Smith, Hawaii of International Politics, Tokyo Hawaii (continues on p. 37 with DIS University Study Project participants list)
Seoul, Korea, 29–30 March 2001 Track-One Diplomacy in Northeast Asia
PARTICIPANTS Republic of Korea Russia Prof. AHN Byung-Joon, Prof. Alexander SIZONENKO, Japan Political Science Dept., Yonsei Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Prof. Kikuchi TSUTOMU, University, Seoul Moscow Japan Institute of International Prof. LEE Seohang, Dir. Gen- Prof. Viatcheslav ZIMONINE, Affairs, Tokyo eral, Institute of Foreign Affairs Institute of Far Eastern Studies, People’s Republic of and National Security, Seoul Moscow Prof. MOON Chung-In, Yonsei China United States University, Seoul Dr. CHU Shulong, China Prof. Susan SHIRK, Research Institute of Contemporary Director, Institute for Global International Relations, Beijing Conflict and Cooperation 35 Regional Relations Building the APEC International Assessment Network (APIAN)
SINCE 1989, THE ASIA PACIFIC Led by Professor Richard Feinberg (UC San ECONOMIC COOPERATION (APEC) Diego), APIAN has issued two major reports. forum has generated official The first of these policy reports, “Learning from declarations with hundreds of Experience,” was released in November 2000 on action items. These initiatives the eve of the annual Leaders Meeting of the cover trade integration, financial APEC Forum in Brunei. The second report, stability, environmental protec- “APIAN Update: Shanghai, Los Cabos, and tion, technical cooperation, and Beyond,” was widely circulated at the such social matters as labor November 2001 APEC Leaders Meeting in rights and educational training. Shanghai, where Feinberg briefed APEC senior APEC’s purpose is to create a officials, business leaders, and the media on the more cooperative and fluid report’s major findings and recommendations. Richard E. FEINBERG security environment through- The third APIAN report will focus on APEC as Photo: Alan Decker out the Pacific Rim, yet currently an institution and will be released prior to the there is no independent monitoring and evalua- October 2002 Leaders Meeting in Los Cabos, tion of the implementation of APEC initiatives. Mexico. This absence has created ignorance and skep- Mexico’s official representatives in APEC ticism about APEC within the academic and held an international symposium on “Expand- general communities. Without scholarly input, ing the Benefits of Economic Growth and APEC is deprived of valuable sources of expert Development: Implementing the Vision” 3–4 information and critical feedback. In addition, December 2001, with the support of the APEC without transparency and public debate, APEC Study Program at El Colegio de Mexico. During officials often do not feel obliged to act upon the symposium various issues relevant to APEC official promises. and the International Consortium of APEC The APEC International Assessment Net- Study Centers were raised, among which was a work (APIAN) was created as a collaborative, suggestion that the consortium might play a independent project among participating APEC more active role in APEC through its analytical Study Centers (ASC), to track and assess the capabilities, contributing to the consolidation of design and execution of select APEC initiatives. the multiple initiatives currently under course in APIAN’s goal is to enhance knowledge among the forum and to the definition of the themes of government officials and the general public with APEC´s renewed agenda. regard to APEC activities, to encourage the ful- For more information and to read the first fillment of APEC objectives and commitments, APIAN policy reports visit
36 Honolulu, Hawaii, 6–7 October 2001 NEACD Defense Information Sharing Study Project
PARTICIPANTS Capt. KWON Byung-Joo, Naval Policy, USCINCPAC, Camp Special Presenters Attaché, Consulate of the Smith, Hawaii Dr. Stanley WEEKS, Senior Republic of Korea, Honolulu, The Russian Federation Capt. Kenneth WALKER, Chief, Scientist, Science Applications Hawaii Dr. Anatoly BOLYATKO, Northeast Asia Branch, Political- International Cooperation, Military Affairs Directorate, Director, Center for Asian- People’s Republic of McLean, Virginia Joint Staff (J-5), Washington, Pacific Studies, Institute of Far Capt. William HICKS, Chief, China D.C. Eastern Studies, Moscow Regional Engagement Dicision, Maj. LI Donglei, Asian Bureau, Col. Alexander GURVICH, USCINCPAC, Camp Smith, Foreign Affairs Office, Ministry Japan Chief of Branch, Dept. of Hawaii International Military of National Defense, Beijing Ishizuka YASUHISA, Director Cooperation, Ministry of of Education Division, Observers The United States of Personnel and Education Defense, Moscow Tyler ALLEN, Institute on America Bureau, Japan Defense Agency, Global Conflict and Tokyo The Republic of Korea Prof. Susan SHIRK, Research Cooperation, La Jolla, Calif. Director, Institute on Global Col. Yanagihara TAKASHIGE, Com. KIM Byeong-Ho, Policy Lt. Cdr. Nakamura Conflict and Cooperation Deputy Director for Policies, Officer, Arms Control Bureau, TOSHIHIRO, J-5 Joint Staff Joint Staff Office, Japan Defense Ministry of National Defense, RADM. William SULLIVAN, Office, Japan Defense Agency, Agency, Tokyo Seoul Director, Strategic Planning and Tokyo, Japan
Regional Relations A New Emphasis on Europe
THE CONTINUING IMPORTANCE OF EUROPE to the hopes to partner with German stability of global relations cannot be underesti- and British research centers on mated. The post–Cold War expansion of NATO these important initiatives. to include some former Soviet satellite states is promising on some fronts and troubling on oth- William M. CHANDLER (Ph.D, ers. European integration, while pushing at the University of North Carolina) is a pro- limits of what it means to be a sovereign state, fessor of political science at UC San offers new models for economic and social coop- Diego and co-Research Director for eration among nations. International Relations (with Miles Arenewed IGCC emphasis on Europe, led by Kahler). His research and teaching Research Director William Chandler, will be have concentrated on European developed in two principal directions. The first affairs, with particular focus on German, French, and Italian politics will explore transformations in transatlantic William M. CHANDLER relations and international security systems. The as well as on issues of European inte- Photo: Staff second concentrates on the governance chal- gration. He is a member of the edito- rial advisory board of German Politics, lenges facing modern societies and alternative a regional director of the Conference Group on policy responses. German Politics, and has served on the board of direc- Related projects may develop around the new tors of the Canadian Political Science Association. He problems of regionalism, supranationalism, and is the author of Public Policy and the Provincial Powers multi-level governance. A special theme will be (Mc-Graw-Hill, 1979), and co-editor of Federalism and the intersection of the post-September 11 securi- the Role of the State (U. Toronto Press, 1987), and ty agenda (with its emphasis on domestic secu- Challenges to Federalism: Policy-Making in Canada and the rity measures) with the challenges of interna- Federal Republic of Germany (Institute of Intergovern- tional economic and social cooperation. IGCC mental Relations, 1989). 37
Research Initiatives Campus Programs
IGCC’S CAMPUS PROGRAMS PRO- During 2001, IGCC funds supported research MOTE research, training, and out- activities for undergraduate and graduate stu- reach on each of the UC campuses. dents, university faculty, visiting scholars, gov- Through its annual internship, fel- ernment officials, and the general public. lowship, and grant competition, IGCC stimu- Highlights of this year’s on-campus programs lates independent and collaborative research may be found on page 4. throughout the UC system. The independent IGCC is one of the largest sources of support IGCC-affiliated for research in international affairs nationally. IGCC is one of the largest campus program For the 2001–2002 academic year the IGCC sources of support for offices reflect the Steering Committee awarded a total of seven research in international unique intellectu- summer internships in Washington, D.C., twen- affairs nationally. al resources and ty-two doctoral dissertation fellowships, and diversity of the fourteen faculty grants. Highlights of the work entire UC system: the UC Berkeley Institute of of three recent dissertation fellows and one sum- International Studies; UC Davis Institute of mer intern may be found on pages 40–42. Re- Governmental Affairs; UC Irvine Global Peace search, conference, and teaching activities fund- and Conflict Studies; UC Los Angeles Center for ed during the annual fellowships and grants International Relations; UC Riverside Program competition included disciplines such as envi- on Global Studies; UC San Diego Institute for ronmental science, political science, history, International, Comparative, and Area Studies; public health, philosophy, sociology, public pol- UC San Francisco Health and Human Survival icy, and agriculture and resource economic poli- Program; UC Santa Barbara Global Peace and cy. (See listings, pp. 40, 43.) Security Program; and UC Santa Cruz Adlai Stevenson Program on Global Security.
Campus Programs Fellowships and Grants
THE CAMPUS PROGRAMS AND THE SERVICES IGCC ties to promote international cooperation. It is provides to them continue to evolve as we enter one of the largest sources of graduate research the new century. Several of the campuses have support in the United States in international or are currently active in plans to develop minor studies, and over the years has funded over 300 or bachelor degree programs in conflict resolu- individual dissertation fellowships from disci- tion and international and global studies on plines such as political science, economics, soci- their respective campuses. IGCC is committed ology, anthropology, literature, history, commu- to seeking innovative partnerships with extra- nications, urban development, legal studies, mural organizations that could benefit UC grad- philosophy, geography, energy resources, envi- uate students and faculty and provide a bridge ronmental studies, and religious studies. IGCC between UC scholars and the national and inter- has also committed significant resources to the national policy communities. support of individual and collaborative UC fac- ulty research. IGCC research, research confer- Fellowships and Grants ence, and teaching grants are designed to stimu- late independent research and education proj- Awarded ects on international issues of contemporary SINCE ITS INCEPTION, IGCC has committed signif- importance. icant resources on all UC campuses to stimulat- A searchable database of past awards is avail- ing research and course development on the able at on the IGCC web site at
39 Campus Programs Dissertation Fellows
Managing Family and Gender Through Immigration Policy
Gina Crivello is currently migration. This may function to further institutionalize the enrolled in the Ph.D. pro- fragmentation of Moroccan families across Spanish and gram in anthropology at Moroccan borders. UC Riverside. Her project During the 2001–2002 year Crivello carried out ethno- focuses on family dynam- graphic research in Madrid, Spain, within a political climate ics within transnational that sought to restrict “undesirable” immigration through migration contexts. immigration policy reform. In addition to other conclusions, it Gina CRIVELLO In July 2001, Morocco’s was realized that policymakers should take into account the Social Development and heterogeneous character of Spain’s immigrant population and Solidarity Minister, Abbas El Fassi, and the Spanish Interior the divisions of gender and ethnicity that are reproduced Minister, Mariano Rajoy, signed an agreement that will allow within migrant groups and shape family life. between 12,000 and 20,000 Moroccan workers a year into Crivello will spend the 2001–2002 academic year as a Spain to fill determined temporary jobs, mainly in the agri- Fulbright Student grantee in Morocco, carrying out ethno- cultural sector. The agreement aims to regulate migrant flows graphic fieldwork in Alhoceima, a community in the Rif across the Strait of Gibraltar by allowing “labor value,” in the region that sends out many migrant workers. Her research form of migrant workers, to enter Spain without the “messy among migrant families across Morocco and Spain adds an family baggage” that is often associated with long-term important binational dimension to her study.
IGCC Ph.D. Dissertation Fellows *partial funding Melinda K. HERROLD, UC Michael T. KOCH, UC Davis, Victor A. PESKIN, UC Berkeley, Mark ANTAKI, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, Environmental Science Political Science Political Science Jurisprudence and Social Policy Policy and Management The Domestic Electoral Environ- Conflicts of Justice: International A Genealogy of Crimes Against Conflicts and Cranes: NGO ment and Violent Foreign Policy Political Tribunals and Domestic Humanity Programs to Improve People-Park Kathleen LYTLE,* UC Los Political Pressure Nielan M. BARNES, UC San Relations in Russia and China Angeles, History Simone PULVER,* UC Berkeley, Diego, Sociology Ethan J. HOLLANDER, UC San Cowboys and Mexicans: A History Sociology Binational Collaboration Between Diego, Political Science of the U.S. Border Patrol, Political Pipelines: The Multiple the U.S. and Mexican HIV/AIDS Ethnic Violence and Military 1924–1954 Roles of Transnational Oil Corpor- Sectors Conquest: Implementing and Sharon L. MCCONNELL,* UC ations in the Climate Debates Omayra CRUZ, UC San Diego, Subverting the Final Solution in Irvine, Political Science Chad RECTOR, UC San Diego, Literature Nazi-Occupied Europe Election Monitoring in Latin Political Science International Racial Antagonism Anne M. HOLOHAN, UC Los America: The Transnational Federation and Formation of and Racial Internationalism: Angeles, Sociology Politics of Democracy Promotion Interstate Contracts Models of Official and Unofficial Webs, Not Walls, in Crisis Amanda MOORE,* UC Irvine, Jennifer W. SEE,* (renewal) UC Japan-U.S. Relations, 1919–1931 Management: Cooperation and Anthropology Santa Barbara, History Kyle EISCHEN, UC San Diego, Coordination in Kosovo Whales and the Politics of Love: The Origins of the Containment Sociology Jennifer D. KIBBE* (renewal) Global Biodiversity and Trans- Policy in the United States, Regional Information-Economies UC Los Angeles, Political national Activism Britain, and France, 1943–1950: A and Global Networks: Mapping the Science Lina NEWTON, (UCSD Fellow) Comparative History Subnational Structure of Competi- Why U.S. Presidents Choose to UC Irvine, Political Science Michael STRUETT, UC Irvine, tion and Cooperation in the Inter- Overthrow Other Governments: The Success of Laws that Fail: U.S. Political Science national Economy Toward a Theory of Covert Action Immigration Policy and the Social The Politics of Constructing an Christian W. ERICKSON, UC Decision Making Construction of Mexican Migration International Criminal Court Davis, Political Science Jeffrey A. KILE, UC Berkeley, Angela J. O’MAHONY, UC San Benjamn C. ZULUETA, UC The Internal Face of the Garrison Anthropology Diego, Political Science Santa Barbara, History State: Regime Type, War, and Transnational Guerilla Warfare: Determinants of Monetary Forging the Model Minority: Domestic Security in the Twentieth Kashmir Militants in the Diaspora Regimes: The Interrelated Choices Chinese Immigrant Intellectuals, Century and the Prospects for Indo- of Monetary Policy, Exchange, and American Science, and the Cold Pakistani Peace Capital Restrictions War, 1949–1965 40 Campus Programs Dissertation Fellows
The Levant Company and English Merchant Writing in Early Modern Turkey
The generous support provided by the IGCC Dissertation IGCC sponsorship has Fellowship, through two academic years of funding, has permitted me to present enabled my progress in several major areas. In the past year, my work several times in because of the renewal grant for a second year of funding, I conference and workshop was able to continue my research. After examining much settings. Two meetings of manuscript data, I was able to draft a strong historical chapter IGCC’s Working Group on on Levant Company merchants as transnational actors and Global, National, and further research the current literature on sovereignty and glob- Ethnic Citizenship Rights Jill M. HOLSLIN alization. Further research has led me to somewhat limit the and the Transformation of Political Space have given me the project’s reliance on colonial discourse theory. opportunity to present my argument and gain valuable feed- During the first year of funding, I was able to complete my back from the other two IGCC fellows and our faculty advi- archival research, attend conferences for my own professional sor, Gershon Shafir. In January and March 2000 I presented development, and conduct further research in a major field. my work at two special sessions, one in conjunction with an The IGCC travel grant awarded in 1999–2000 allowed me to IGCC conference on Globalization and Human Rights at complete two research trips where I gathered essential University of California, Irvine, and the other at an archival materials of Levant Company merchant writings International Relations Conference in Los Angeles. This year, from manuscripts in the British Library and London’s Public I have continued to work closely with another research fellow, Record Office. I spent December 1999–January 2000 in Maureen Feeley, sharing ideas while working on my writing. London, and I was able to return during June 2000 to gather Jill M. Holslin is a Ph.D. candidate in the Deptartment of Literature, my final data. UC San Diego.
Amalia Elizabeth of Hesse-Cassel: Power and Complexity in the Thirty Years’ War
Trynjte Helfferich received her M.A. in History at the cally destructive to many, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque and is currently a possessed their own inter- doctoral candidate at UC Santa Barbara. Her project investi- nal rationality and order. gates the causes and mechanisms of war by studying the Her actions were not sense- motivations of a particular person at a particular time in a par- less, but were based on a ticular war. Specifically, it examines the first great pan- strong belief in their ulti- European conflict, the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648), from the mate success, and were perspective of the life of the Landgravine of the German state focused unflinchingly on a Trynjte HELFFERICH of Hesse-Cassel, Amalia Elisabeth, a key but overlooked fig- single multifaceted goal. ure in both the war’s continuation and in its final conclusion Rationality, in other words, is in the eye of the beholder, and is at the Peace of Westphalia. thus an ineffective tool in understanding international con- In order to understand this, and, as Helfferich argues, any flict. other war, we must understand the people who waged it and As a corollary, this study of Amalia Elisabeth has also ask why they continued despite staggering losses to them- underlined the importance of examining religion and ideolo- selves and to their states. In doing so, this study has produced gy in attempting to understand the motivations for war. a number of important policy implications, especially note- Combatants who believe they are doing God’s work or fulfill- worthy given the events of September 11. ing a destiny chosen by God, as she did, will behave very dif- First, this project has shown conclusively that one cannot ferently from those who are defending themselves, their fam- truly understand international relations in terms of rational ilies, or their states, and very differently again from those who choice or raison d’etat (terms frequently used interchangeably). are attempting to thwart an economic or political rival. Amalia Elizabeth’s choices, which seemed bizarre and politi-
41 Campus Programs Fellowships and Internships
IGCC–UC DC Fellowships in students from a broad range of fields with inter- ests in international affairs. Over the past three Foreign Policy Studies years, students have been placed at such diverse FOR THE 2001–02 ACADEMIC YEAR, IGCC has a organizations as the World Bank, Overseas grant from the UC Office of the President to offer Private Investment Corporation, the Asia one doctoral dissertation fellowship for conduct Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Women, of research in Washington, D.C. This fellowship Law, and Development International, the is intended to encourage and support graduate Congressional Research Service, World student research by drawing on the array of Resources Institute, and the International resources there, including access to policymak- Human Rights Law Group/Cambodia Project. ers for research-oriented interviews, internation- For the summer of 2001, IGCC offered seven al organizations and foreign government masters or doctoral pre-dissertation level intern- embassies, and historical archives. ships, allowing recipients to gain experience working in the city where U.S. foreign policy is made. Graduate students in master's, J.D., M.D., Internships or professional degree programs gain valuable ONE OF THE MAJOR SUCCESSES of the IGCC practical experience, preparation, and contacts Washington office is the master's and pre-doc- for future career opportunities. Similarly, gradu- toral International Affairs Graduate Summer ate students in the early stages of doctoral pro- Internship Program in Washington, D.C. This is grams gain valuable experience as well as refine an interdisciplinary program open to graduate their research interests.
the independence . . . offered me the Washington Internship opportunity to negotiate the kind The IGCC award allowed The personnel at WOLA were extremely helpful and me to intern with the friendly. More important, they were excellent researchers and of internship Washington Office on Latin top-quality analysts, not only of the current situation, but also responsibilities America (WOLA), a lead- of the history of conflict in Latin America. This has made them that will be most ing human rights research one of the most respected and credible organizations when it and policy institute in comes to human rights concerns in Latin America. It also useful for future Washington, D.C. My proj- helped make my internship a great learning experience. career plans. ect consisted of two com- A positive aspect of the program was the meeting sched- ponents. The primary com- uled for us to meet all the other award recipients. It was a ponent involved an in-depth investigation of the right-wing great opportunity to meet and network with others and pro- Colombian paramilitary death-squad organization called the vided a sense of camaraderie. It also allowed us to meet with United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), the leading the support staff, especially Joseph McGhee and our respec- human rights violator in the Colombian conflict. The project tive campus representatives. The Organization of American involved investigating and documenting the structure, tactics, States tour was also an excellent event, giving us access to one finances, objectives, development, and growth of the AUC. It of the important regional multilateral organizations. included collecting and analyzing statistical data on type, fre- Another positive aspect of the program is the great flexibil- quency, intensity, and location of human rights violations by ity that it allows. By not limiting or prescribing with whom paramilitaries and culminated in a written report document- we can work, the program provided a broad range of oppor- ing paramilitary growth and spread between 1997 and 2000. tunities that would not otherwise have been available. The secondary component was policy advocacy. It consisted Additionally, the independence it allows offered me the of networking, strategy, and coalition work with other organ- opportunity to negotiate the kind of internship responsibili- izations and key congressional leaders that are also working ties that will be most useful for future career plans. to promote a reassessment of U.S. policy toward Colombia, Hector Perla is a Ph.D candidate in the Department of Political with efforts geared toward presenting compelling informa- Science at UC Los Angeles. tion and testimony on human rights concerns.
42 Campus Programs Faculty Grants
2001Ð2002 RESEARCH Monica J. CASPER, UC Santa Transnational Networks and the UC Davis Institute of Govern- CONFERENCE GRANT Cruz, Sociology Conduct of War: Three Case mental Affairs RECIPIENTS Quinacrine Sterilization and Studies Human Rights Speaker Series Fred BLOCK, UC Davis, Population Politics: Collaboration Kal L. RAUSTIALA, UC Los UC Irvine Global Peace and Sociology and Conflict Among International Angeles, School of Law Conflict Studies Program Women’s Groups A Third Great Transformation? The Choice of Form in Multilateral Religion, Ethics, and Security in Using Polanyi to Understand Christopher J. COSTELLO, UC Agreements International Studies Globalization Santa Barbara, Bren School of Etel SOLINGEN,* UC Irvine, UC Los Angeles Burkle Center Environmental Policy Wayne A. CORNELIUS, UC Political Science for International Relations San Diego, Center for Compara- On the Preservation of Trans- Internationalization, Norms, and International Law Speaker Series tive Immigration Studies boundary Non-Harvested Species the Transformation of Domestic International Migration and Barry EICHENGREEN, UC Politics UC San Diego Project in International Security Affairs Economic Integration in the Asia- Berkeley, Economics Barbara F. WALTER, UC San Pacific Region: the Role of Japan, The Political Economy of Diego, Graduate School of What Have We Learned from with Comparative Reference to the International Monetary and International Relations and Cross-Border Collaboration on the United States Financial Reform Pacific Studies (IR/PS) U.S.-Mexican Border Patrick M. MORGAN, UC Jack A. GOLDSTONE, UC Explaining the Persistence of Environment? Irvine, Political Science Davis, Sociology Territorial Conflict Transitions to Democracy: State Achieving Security in International Identifying the Causes of Collapsed Formation and Identity in Africa Politics: The East Asian Experience States from Global Data, UC Santa Barbara Global and IGCC CAMPUS 1955–2000 International Studies Program PROGRAM ACTIVITY 2001Ð2002 FACULTY Barbara KOREMENOS,* UC Women, Culture, and Development Los Angeles, Political Science AWARDS RESEARCH GRANT Global Peace, Security, and Human International Agreement Study UC Berkeley Institute of RECIPIENTS Rights Symposium Mark LICHBACH, UC International Studies *partial funding COWHIG Cold War History Riverside, Political Science Environmental Politics Colloquium Victoria BERNAL,* UC Irvine, Group Global Order and Local Resistance International Relations Colloquium Anthropology UC Santa Cruz Adlai Stevenson Richard A. MATTHEW, UC Wired for War? Diasporas, Program on Global Security Irvine, Urban and Regional Cyberspace, and Conflict in the Planning Humanistic Methodologies in the Horn of Africa Social Sciences: International Relations Considered
International Affairs Graduate Summer Internship Program 2001 Interns
*partial funding Jeff COLGAN* Subhadra GANGULI Rachel IDOWU Emily BOSANQUET* Goldman School of Public Economics School of Medicine Bren School of Environmental Policy UC Riverside UC San Francisco Science Management UC Berkeley Environmental Protection Agency, World Relief, Summer 2001 UC Santa Barbara World Bank, Summer 2001 Summer 2001 Greenpeace, Summer 2001 Alejandra DOMENZAIN Tamara GARDNER Jaquelin COCHRAN Latin American Studies, Urban School of Public Health UC Berkeley Planning UC Berkeley Energy and Resource Group, UC Los Angeles USAID FANTA project, Natural Resources Defense World Bank, Summer 2001 Summer 2001 Council, Summer 2001
43 Campus Programs Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops
IGCC SUPPORTS CAMPUS-BASED EVENTS that stimulate research by bringing world-class speakers and scholars together in the aca- demic community. For more information, contact the appropriate campus program office. A directory of campus program offices begins on page 60.
UC Berkeley Institute of 24 October 2001. “Systems, Causes, and 7 November 2001. “Nonparametric Model International Studies Rates: Units of Analysis in the Study of Discrimination in International Relations” African Fertility” CGES Politics and Enterprise Speaker Series Kevin A. CLARKE, Dept. of Political and International Relations Theory Jennifer JOHNSON-HANKS, Dept. of Science, University of Rochester Demography, UC Berkeley 29 August 2001. “Comparative Capitalism Berkeley Workshop on Environmental Politics, 31 October 2001. “The Fertility of in the Global Economy: Understanding Colloquium Series National Production Systems” Immigrant Women: Selectivity and Assimilation” 21 September 2001. “Divergent Peter GOUREVITCH, Deforestation in Bolivia and El Salvador: Lorenzo BLANCO, Dept. of Economics, UCSD Globalization from Above and Below” UC Berkeley Demography Brown Bag Susanna HECHT, Urban Planning, UC 7 November 2001. “A New Method to Los Angeles 29 August 2001. “Detecting the Effect of Estimate the Rate of Illegal Induced Medical Care on Mortality” Abortion? Results from Rural Burkina 28 September 2001. “Cycles of Resource Ray CATALANO, Public Health, UC Faso” Exploitation in the Bering Sea: The Role of the Aleuts, Russia, and the United States” Berkeley Clementine ROSSIER, Dept. of 5 September 2001. “The Role of Labor Demography, UC Berkeley Helen CORBETT, Director, Amiq Institute, Alberta, Canada Market Opportunities in Explaining 14 November 2001. “Gender, Equality, School Attendance” (by Elisabeth and Reproductive Health” 12 October 2001. “Water and Inequality in Sadoulet, Frederico Finan, and Alain de the Global South” Dr. Nancy PADIAN, UC San Francisco, Janvry) AIDS Research Institute Ben CROW, Dept. of Sociology, UC San Elisabeth SADOULET, Agricultural and Francisco 28 November 2001. “Health Risk and Resource Economics, UC Berkeley Portfolio Choice” 26 October 2001. “How Agricultural 12 September 2001. “Rescaling the Life Demonstration Projects Can Influence Ryan EDWARDS, Dept. of Economics, Cycle: Longevity and Proportionality” Policy and Practice: Comparing the Joint UC Berkeley Ronald LEE (with Josh GOLDSTEIN) Forest Management and an Indigenous 5 December 2001. “The Friend We Have Dept. of Demography, UC Berkeley Rice Gene Bank in India” Lost, the Understanding We Have Debal DEB, Consultant, Research 19 September 2001. “Accidents Will Gained: Peter Laslett, in Memoriam” Happen? Unintentional Childhood Foundation for Science, Technology, and Gene HAMMEL, Dept. of Demography, Injuries and Child Care Policy” Ecology, New Delhi, India UC Berkeley Janet CURRIE, Dept. of Economics, UC 30 November 2001. “Development? Oh, Ken WACHTER, Dept. of Demography, Los Angeles and NBER Please Tell Me Another Story” UC Berkeley 26 September 2001. “Mortality in South Debal DEB, Consultant, Research Africa: From Apartheid to AIDS” International Relations Theory, Colloquium Foundation for Science, Technology, and Ecology, New Delhi, India Ian TIMAEUS, London School of Series Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 4 September 2001. “Honest Threats: The 7 December 2001. “Regional Politics and Agrarian Conflict: The Case of the INCO 3 October 2001. “The Migrations of Serbs Interaction of Reputation and Political Nickel Mine in Sulawesi” and Albanians In and Between Kosovo Institutions in International Crises” and Inner Serbia circa 1930–81” Alastair SMITH, Dept. of Political Arianto SANGAJI, Executive Director, Yayasan Tanah Merdeka (Free Land Gene HAMMEL, Dept. of Demography, Science, Yale University Foundation), Central Sulawesi, Indonesia UC Berkeley 20 September 2001. “Democracy’s Fourth 14 December 2001. “The Commodification Mirjana STEVANOVIC, Archeological Virtue” of Nature and the Legibility of Property: Research Facility, UC Berkeley Dan REITER, Dept. of Political Science, Emory University Debating Eastern India’s Ecological 10 October 2001. “Early Childhood Revolution and the Origins of Its 10 October 2001. “Why Rush to Free Conditions and Later Life Mortality in the Contemporary Hydraulic Crisis” United States” Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries” Rohan D’SOUZA, Ciracy-Wantrup Douglas ALMOND, Dept. of Economics, Fellow and ERG Visiting Scholar, UC Helen MILNER, Dept. of Political Science, UC Berkeley Berkeley Columbia University 17 October 2001. “Did Industrialization Miscellaneous Destroy Social Capital in Indonesia?” 17 October 2001. “The Effects of Uncertainty and Sex in a Crisis Simulation 14 March 2001. “Thucydides: The First Edward MIGUEL, Dept. of Economics, Constructivist” UC Berkeley Game” Rose MCDERMOTT, Dept. of Richard Ned LEBOW, History, Political Government, Cornell University Science, and Psychology, Ohio State University
44 Campus Programs Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops
4 April 2001. “Fragmentation: New Panel Two: Human Rights and Health Emily GOLDMAN, John R. HALL, and Production Patterns in the World Tida VIOLENTE, Public Health: UNICEF, Steven M. SHEFFRIN, UC Davis Economy” Ethiopia 17 October 2001. “September 11, 2001, and Henryk K. KIERZKOWSKI, Dept. of Mark HUNTER, Geography: Its Aftermath: Historical Perspectives” Co- Economics, Graduate Institute of Gingindlovu AIDS and Health Awareness sponsored with the Institute on Global International Studies, Geneva Group/University of Natal, Community Conflict and Cooperation 23 April 2001. “The Causes of War Outreach and Service Learning, South “Islamic Movements and the Taliban” Termination” Africa Barbara D. METCALF, UC Davis Hein GOEMANS, Dept. of Political Lisa BUTLER and Ann Maria XET “Inner Asia in Historical Perspective” Science, Duke University MULL, Public Health: California Daniel BROWER, UC Davis Department of Health 25 April 2001. “International Norms and 29 October 2001. “No Peace, No Honor: National Corruption” Panel Three: State Politics and Vulnerable Nixon, Kissinger, and Betrayal in Wayne SANDHOLTZ, Dept. of Political Populations Vietnam” Science, UC Irvine Joshua PAGE, Sociology: Joint Legislative Larry BERMAN, Director, UC 25 October 2001. “September 11: Causes, Committee on Prison Operations and Washington Academic Center Consequences, and Responses” Construction, California 14 November 2001. “The Threat of Joel BEININ, Dept. of History, Stanford U. Srinivasu SUNKARA, Development Emerging Diseases and Bioterrorism” Robin EINHORN, Dept. of History, UC Studies/Biochemistry: Comision Mexicana Frederick MURPHY, Dean Emeritus, UC Berkeley de Defensa y Promocion de los Derechos Davis School of Veterinary Medicine and Steve WEBER, Dept. of Political Science, Humanos, Mexico former director of the Center for UC Berkeley Daniela YANAI, School of Law: Infectious Diseases Kiren CHAUDHRY, Dept. of Political Alternative Information Center, Israel 28 November 2001. “Impressions of Israel Science, UC Berkeley Discussant: Eugene BARDACH, Public in Its Present Agony: An Outsider’s View Moderator: Michael WATTS, Institute of Policy from Jerusalem” International Studies 14 November 2001. “Ground Zero: Henry William HAGEN, UC Davis Moore’s ‘Atom Piece’ and the Geography Chancellor’s Forum on Nuclear Danger and Contemporary Issues in Pacific Rim of Sacrifice” Global Survival Countries Series Lain A. BOAL, Dept. of Geography, UC 8 November 2001. “Nuclear Weapons Berkeley 12 October 2001. “The Economic After September 11: Terrorism, Geography of Growth in China” Geopolitics, and International Responses” 16 November 2001. “On Re-interpreting Islamic Gender Rights” Wing WOO, UC Davis David CARON, Nayan CHANDA, Scott 19 October 2001. “Leaving and Returning SAGAN, Susan SHIRK, and Shibley M. Suraj SAIT, University of East to China’s Villages: The Dynamics of TELHAMI London, former State Prosecutor on Human Rights in India Migration in China During the Reforms” 8 November 2001. Presentation by Scott ROZELLE, UC Davis Summer Human Rights Fellows UC Davis Institute on Panel One: Human Rights and the Governmental Affairs Alan DEBRAUW, UC Davis Environment 2 November 2001. “Who Recovers First? PolicyWatch Series Logan HENNESSY, ESPM, Center for Banking Crises Resolution in Developing 14 March 2001. “Domestic Politics and American Indian Rights and Countries” Foreign Policy in China” Environmental Law, Guyana Gabriella MONTINOLA, UC Davis Susan L. SHIRK, Research Director, IGCC Mary Beth KAUFMAN, Law: Oil 16 November 2001. “Chaebols and Watch/Center for Economic and Social 4 April 2001. “Global Production Catastrophe: A New View of Korean Rights, Ecuador Networks” Business Groups and Their Role in the Diana PEI WU, ESPM: The Borneo Henryk KIERZKOWSKI, Dept. of Financial Crisis” Project, Borneo Economics, Graduate Institute of Robert FEENSTRA, UC Davis International Studies, Geneva Leena PENDHARKAR, Journalism: 30 November 2001. “The Microeconomics International Rivers Network, India 10 October 2001. “September 11, 2001 and of Globalization: Examples from Mexico, Faculty its Aftermath: A Forum” China, El Salvador, and the Galapagos Discussant: Louise FORTMANN, ESPM Islands” Ed TAYLOR, UC Davis
45 Campus Programs Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops
IGCC Human Rights Speaker Series 27 February 2001. “Current Views of the 21 May 2001. “Muslim-Jewish Relations: 5 October 2001. “Violations, Restrictions, Taliban” Harmony and Discord Throughout and the Promise of Democratic Sayed Rahmatullah HASHIMI, History” Pacification” Ambassador at Large, Government of Rashid KHALIDI, Director, Center for Christian DAVENPORT, University of Afghanistan International Studies, University of Maryland Chicago Center for Social Theory and Comparative 7 September 2001. “Housing Needs in History Annual Colloquium Series Steven SPIEGEL, Associate Director of Selected Counties and Farm Worker the Burkle Center for International 12 March 2001. “After the Cold War: Housing Needs” Relations Democratic Peace or U.S. Hegemony?” Conference organized by Professor Phil 4 June 2001. “Pursuit of Arab-Israeli John MEARSHEIMER, Dept. of Political MARTIN, Dept. of Agriculture and Peace: A Retrospective” Science, University of Chicago Resource Economics, UC Davis Aaron MILLER, Senior Advisor for Chalmers JOHNSON, Japan Policy 4 October 2001. “Anthropometric Middle East Negotiations, Bureau of Near Research Organization Measures of Living Standards in Russia Eastern Affairs 16 March 2001. “President Nixon: Film from the Eighteenth Century to Stalin” 6 June 2001. “Organizational Evolution of and Foreign Policy” Boris MIRONOV, Russian Academy of Nonproliferation Policy” Eric HAMBURG, Visiting Scholar, Burkle Sciences and St. Petersburg State Amy ZEGART, UCLA Law School Center for International Relations University 25 September 2001. “The September 11th 4 April 2001. “Ethnic Religious Conflicts 18–20 October 2001. Western Humanities Attacks on New York and Washington and Arms Proliferation in Central Asia Alliance 20th Annual Conference and the U.S. Response” and Caucasus” “Civility and Uncivil Society” Moderator: Michael D. INTRILIGATOR, Amin TARZI, Center for Nonproliferation Co-sponsored with the Davis Humanities Director, Burkle Center for International Studies, Monterey Institute for Institute Relations International Studies 23 October 2001. “The Pacific Rim Panelists: Tad DALEY, Visiting Scholar, 6 April 2001. “Globalization of the World Research Program: An Informational Burkle Center for International Relations Workshop for Prospective Applicants” Economy: Potential Benefits and Costs and a Net Assessment” Steven SPIEGEL, Associate Director, Florence MOU, Pacific Rim Research Burkle Center for International Relations Program Grant/Fellowship Administrator Michael INTRILIGATOR, Director, Martin BACKSTROM, Pacific Rim Burkle Center for International Relations Political Study of International Law Series Research Program Coordinator 18 April 2001. “Moving Beyond the Great 22 February 2001. “Multilateral Game: Agenda Control and Russia's Environmental Governance: Lessons from UC Los Angeles Burkle Center Leverage in the Caspian Basin” the Last Thirty Years” for International Relations Adam N. STULBERG, Visiting Fellow, Peter HAAS, University of Massachusetts 16 January 2001. “Problematic Monterey Institute for International 26 February 2001. Sovereignty” Studies Anne-Marie SLAUGHTER, Professor of Stephen KRASNER, Dept. of Political 4 May 2001. “Nuclear Proliferation Law, Harvard University Science, Stanford University Challenges in the New Millennium” 7 March 2001. “Form and Substance in Fifth Annual Arnold Harberger Lecture William C. POTTER, Director, Center for Multilateral Agreements” Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey 17 January 2001. ”The Impact of Kal RAUSTIALA, Law School, UC Los Institute of International Studies Globalization on World Peace” Angeles 7 May 2001. “The Challenges Limited Thomas FRIEDMAN, foreign affairs 15 March 2001. “Hard Law Versus Soft Conflicts Pose for Western Democracies: columnist for the New York Times Law in International Relations” Israel and Palestinians as a Case Study” 19 January 2001. “Exploring India's Kenneth ABBOTT, School of Law, Ariel LEVITE, Visiting Fellow, Center for Nuclear Labyrinth” Northwestern University International Security and Cooperation Raju George C. THOMAS, Dept. of (CISAC) 21 March 2001. Political Science, Marquette University 10 May 2001. “Missile Defense: Where Do Barbara KOREMENOS, Dept. of Political 26 February 2001. “The Iranian Approach We Go From Here?” Science, UC Los Angeles to International Relations” Richard L. GARWIN, Senior Fellow of the 25 April 2001. Seyed Hossein SEIFZADEH, Teheran Council on Foreign Relations Judy GOLDSTEIN, Dept. of Political University and Iranian Ministry of Science, Stanford University Foreign Affairs
46 Campus Programs Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops
4 October 2001. “The Law and Politics of Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Pan GUANG, Director, Institute for Treaty Compliance: Explaining the Russian Federation; and Member of the European and Asian Studies, Shanghai Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash State Council of the Russian Federation Academy of Social Sciences Against Human Rights Regimes” 15 October 2001. “Missile Defense: 20 November 2001. “Reinventing the Laurence HELFER, Prof. of Law and Realities and Perspectives” (co-sponsored United Nations System” Lloyd Tevis Fellow, Loyola Law School by the Center for European and Russian Tad DALEY, Visiting Scholar, Burkle 15 October 2001. “International Studies) Center for International Relations Governance and the Politics of Expertise” Amb. Oleg GRINEVSKY, Head of the 6 December 2001. “September 11 in David KENNEDY, Henry Shattuck Soviet Delegation to the Conference on Context: The Four International Waves of Professor, Harvard Law School Disarmament in Europe; Gorbachev’s Modern Terror” Ambassador-at-Large; Head of the Soviet 26 October 2001. ”Which Environmental David C. RAPOPORT, Professor Delegation to the Vienna Conference on Treaties Work Best? Toward a Theory of Emeritus, Dept. of Political Science, UC Conventional Armed Forces Reductions Relative Effectiveness” Los Angeles, and editor of the journal in Europe; and Russian Ambassador to Ron MITCHELL, Stanford University Terrorism and Political Violence Sweden 14 November 2001. The Burkle Center International Relations 24 October 2001. ”Russian Elite Attitudes Town Meeting Andrew GUZMAN, Acting Professor, UC to NATO Enlargement in the Context of Berkeley School of Law the War on Terrorism” 18 October 2001. “Town Meeting on the Terrorist Attacks and the U.S. Response” Burkle Center for International Relations Dr. Leonid KOSALS, Chief Researcher, Panelists: Michael D. INTRILIGATOR Seminars Institute for Socio-Economic Problems of the Population, Russian Academy of (Chair and Moderator), Director, Burkle 5 March 2001. “U.S. Policy in the Middle Center for International Relations East: What Is Old and What Is New” Sciences, Moscow 31 October 2001. “The Impact of Steven SPIEGEL, Associate Director, Shibley TELHAMI, Anwar Sadat Burkle Center for International Relations Professor of Peace, Dept. of Political September 11 on the Middle East Khaled ABOU EL FADLM, School of Science, University of Maryland, and Conflict” Law, UC Los Angeles Brookings Institution Dr. Steven SPIEGEL, Associate Director, Ted DALEY, Visiting Scholar, Burkle 6 March 2001. “The Risks of Nuclear War Burkle Center for International Relations Center for International Relations in South Asia” 5 November 2001. “The Potential Role of Scott SAGAN, Co-Director, Center for the Media in Preventing Deadly Conflict” UC Irvine International Security and Cooperation David HAMBURG, Former President, Margolis Lecture Carnegie Corporation of New York and (CISAC), Stanford University 8 May 2001. “What Kind of Rising Power Co-Chair, Carnegie Commission on 13 March 2001. “European Defense Is China?” Preventing Deadly Conflict Cooperation” Susan L. SHIRK, Research Director, IGCC Roger MORGAN, Chatham House, Eric HAMBURG, Visiting Scholar, Burkle Center for International Relations 18–20 May 2001. Civil Wars and Post- London Conflict Transitions Conference 8 November 2001. “U.S. Grand Strategy 14 March 2001. “Rewards and Sanctions Co-sponsored by the the World Bank in Strategic Relations” and Nuclear Stability: Are They Incompatible?” Research Group (DECRG) Gitty AMINI, BCIR Pre-doctoral Fellow, UC Los Angeles Michael MAY, Professor Emeritus, Dept. UC Riverside Program on of Engineering-Economic Systems and 24 April 2001. Michael NACHT, Dean, International Affairs Operations Research, UC Los Angeles and Goldman School of Public Policy, UC 13 February 2001. “Global Order and former Director, Lawrence Livermore Berkeley Local Resistance: The Protest Coalition in National Laboratory 3 May 2001. “What if Nuclear Weapons the Battle of Seattle” 13 November 2001. “The People Grow Are Used Again?” Mark I. LICHBACH, Dept. of Political Tired of a Confusion Whose End is Not in Science, UC Riverside George QUESTER, Dept. of Government Sight: Vietnam Then and Afghanistan and Politics, University of Maryland Now” UC San Diego Project in 12 October 2001. “Where is Russia Jack VALENTI, President of the Motion International Security Affairs Headed?” (co-sponsored by the Center for Picture Association of America 12 March 2001. “Policy Uncertainty and European and Russian Studies) 19 November 2001. “The Shanghai Plant Location: Japanese Multinational Governor Victor Ivanovich ISHAEV, Cooperation Organization and Its Possible Corporations 1990–1996.” Governor of the Khabarovsk Region of Role in the War on Terrorism” Witold HENISZ, The Wharton School, Russia; Member of the Council of University of Pennsylvania
47 Campus Programs Conferences, Seminars, and Workshops
16 March 2001. “Information Disclosure UC Santa Barbara Global Peace Prof. Dru GLADNEY, Dept. of Asian Process in Monetary Policy: Transparency and Security Progam Studies, University of Hawaii and Between the BoJ and the Fed” Global Peace, Security, and Human Rights Research Scholar at the East-West Center. Shuji KOBAYAKAWA, New York Lecture Series 24 October 2001. “India’s Role in the Representatives Office, Bank of Japan 17 April 2001. “Revolutions in Current Global Crisis” 20 March 2001. “Global Order and Local Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern Prof. Manoranjan MOHANTY, Chair of Resistance: The Neoliberal Institutional International Relations” Political Science Dept., Delhi University Trilemma and the Battle of Seattle” Daniel PHILPOTT, Dept. of Political Global Forces in the Post-Cold War World Science, UC Santa Barbara Mark LICHBACH, Dept. of Political Lecture Series Science, UC Riverside 29 May 2001. “Globalization and Its 4 April 2001. “The Power of One: How Discontents” 19 April 2001. “Partisanship and Trade One Person Can Work for Human Rights Policy: Is there a Left-Right Divide on Robert B. REICH, Maurice B. Hexter and Change the World” Trade Policy?” Professor of Social and Economic Policy, Marc KIELBURGER, Director of Brandeis University Helen MILNER, Columbia University International Projects for Free the 25 April 2001. “Challenges of a Rapidly 10 October 2001. “National Missile Children Aging Society: China to Follow Japan and Defenses and the Politics of Nostalgia” Taiwan” Frances FITZGERALD, Author Cold War History Public Lecture Series Jersey LIANG, School of Public Health, 14 November 2001. “The New Middle 13 March 2001. “Russian Anti- University of Michigan East: From Lebanon to Iran” Americanism: From Stalin to Putin” 25 October 2001. “The International Giandomenico PICCO, Personal Vladislav ZUBOK, National Security Organization and Enforcement of Labor Representative of the Secretary General for Archive Standards” (co-sponsored by the Applied the United Nations’ Year of Dialogue UC Santa Cruz Adlai E. Micro Workshop) Among Civilizations Stevenson Progarm on Global Robert STAIGER, Dept. of Economics, 28 November 2001. “Women Building Security University of Wisconsin Peace: From the Village Council to the May 2001. “Social Networks and Regional 14 November 2001. “International Negotiating Table” Economies: International Linkages, Protection of Intellectual Property” (co- Sanam NARAGHI-ANDERLINI, Senior Migration, and Economic Growth” (co- sponsored by the Applied Micro Policy Advisor, International Alert sponsored by the Institute for Workshop) Global and International Studies Program International Studies, UC Berkeley, and Gene GROSSMAN, Dept. of Economics, 26 April 2001. “Memory and Narcissism: the Dept. of Sociology, Stanford Princeton University The Ayodhaya Narrative and Civil Society University) UC San Francisco Program in in India” 1–2 June 2001. Air Quality and Health Science and Human Prof. Neera CHANDHOKE, Dept. of Environmental Justice Workshop Survival Political Science, Delhi University 7 November 2001. “Greener Is Safer: Spring 2001. “Shaping the Future of 7 October 2001. “The New U.S. Missile Energy Dimensions of the Crisis” International Health” Third Annual Defense Program and Arms Control in the Alan RICHARDS, Dept. of Health Conference Post-Cold War Era” Environmental Studies, UC Santa Cruz 10–17 November 2001. Global Partnership Randall FORSBERG, Executive Director Brent HADDAD, Dept. of Environmental in Primary Care Innovation (GPPCI) of the Institute for Defense and Studies, UC Santa Cruz Planning Conference Disarmament Studies (IDDS) 30 November 30–1 December 2001. “Re- 22 October 2001. “China’s Islamic thinking Food Production-Consumption: Terrorists” Integrative Perspectives on Agrarian Restructuring, Agro-Food Networks, and Food Politics”
48 International Security Policy Symposium in Honor of Herbert York (continued from p. 20)
Participants in the second panel (from l. to r.): Etel SOLINGEN, George RATHJENS, Stan SHEINBAUM, Ruth ADAMS, Peif PANOFSKY Photo: Rachel York-Williams
The Herbert York Postdoctoral Fellowship and was co-founder and chief scientist of the Program will provide support for one fellow in Department of Defense advanced research proj- residence at LLNL’s Center for Global Security ects. York was an ambassador and chief negotia- Research (CGSR). The CGSR brings together tor for comprehensive test ban negotiations dur- diverse expert communities to address common ing the Carter administration. He has remained challenges with significant security policy impli- a key figure on the UC San Diego campus and cations. The York Fellow will participate in the has continued his close association with IGCC, the center’s activities and develop a relevant the institute he founded. In 2001 he received study under the guidance of a senior staff men- three prestigious awards: the Enrico Fermi tor. Recent Ph.D.s in science and engineering are Award from the United States for his contribu- encouraged to apply. tions to nuclear deterrence and arms control York, 79, has had an extensive and distin- agreements, the Clark Kerr Award for Distin- guished career, beginning with his work on the guished Leadership in Higher Education from Manhattan Project. He served as director of the UC Berkeley’s Academic Senate, and the Vanne- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and var Bush Award from the National Science as a science adviser to President Eisenhower, Board.
Participants in the third panel (from l. to r.): Mark THIEMENS, Jim ARNOLD, Merf GOLDBERGER, Andy VITERBI Photo: Rachel York-Williams
49
Contents Administration
Dissemination 52 IGCC in Washington, D.C. 52 Teaching Seminars 52 Opinion-Editorial 52 Public Lectures and Colloquia 52 Partner Institutions 52 Publications 53 IGCCOnline 55 Management 2001 56 Supporters 56 Research Directors 56 Financial Summary 57 Steering Committee 58 Campus Program Directory 60 Facilities 62 Masthead Inside Back Cover
Noteworthy 63 IGCC Washington Event 63 Upcoming Deadlines 64 Noteworthy 64
51 Administration Dissemination
IGCC in Washington, Dali YANG, Dept. of Political Science, Susan SHIRK. “Korea Policy in University of Chicago Transition: Will Confrontation Win Out D.C. 25 October 2001. “No Peace, No Honor” Over Negotiation? San Diego Union- Tribune, 17 March 2001. IN 1997, IGCC ESTABLISHED AN OFFICE in Larry BERMAN, Director, UC Washington to promote closer links Washington Academic Center between UC research and the policy Public Lectures and community. IGCC’s unique structure Teaching Seminars Colloquia enables research teams to be drawn INANEFFORT TO PROMOTE undergradu- IGCC PROVIDES A SUBSTANTIAL RE- from all UC campuses and the UC- ate teaching of contemporary interna- SOURCE to the public as well as the managed Lawrence Livermore, Law- tional security issues and provide edu- academic community. In keeping with rence Berkeley, and Los Alamos cators with new course materials, its work to find peaceful solutions to National Laboratories. IGCC’s Wash- IGCC sponsors semiannual one- to current world conflicts, IGCC faculty ington representative Joseph McGhee two-day intensive teaching seminars. speak in public forums, respond to helps facilititate the communication of Faculty from throughout the Univer- inquiries by the press and provide ideas and research results to “the hill” sity of California, the California State news analyses. IGCC Washington through conferences, seminars, work- Universities, and California communi- events are highlighted on pages 25 shops, and policy briefings. The office ty colleges attend, as well as UC Ph.D. and 63. For a sampling of scholarly has provided the U.S. Congress with students. Faculty organizers take events open to the public at the cam- expert testimony, member and staff advantage of the strengths represent- puses, see pages 44–47. briefings, and UC faculty opinion- ed on the nine UC campuses and the editorials, articles, and publications on National Laboratories to pull together Partner Institutions subjects such as the Asian economic programs suited to a multi-discipli- IGCC’S DIRECTOR AND RESEARCH DIREC- crisis, global climate change, compar- nary audience. Agendas include small TORS are directly involved by invita- ative immigration policy, Middle East group discussions, samples of course tion in high-level policy discussions, policy, Asian security cooperation, syllabi, case studies, or other demon- such as Wilton Park (U.K.) confer- Latin American affairs, and nuclear strations of experiential teaching tech- ences, Aspen Institute retreats, and issues in South Asia. niques. testimony before U.S. Congressional With time, funders have become subcommittees. more particular about seeing evidence Opinion-Editorial In addition to affiliate programs of dissemination of research results. based on each of the nine UC cam- Policy briefings and seminars to dis- IGCC FACULTY ARE SOUGHT OUT as com- puses, IGCC's research partners often seminate UC faculty research can be mentators on world affairs. Below is a act as co-publishers and disseminate easily arranged by IGCC’s Washing- small selection of the interviews, let- research findings through their own ton office, and plans for such events ters and comments that appear in programs. These include the UC can be built into initial grant propos- public media annually. Berkeley Roundtable on the Inter- als. For more information or to sched- Richard FEINBERG. “Americas Sum-mit: national Economy, UC San Diego ule a meeting, contact Joseph McGhee, Progress or Photo-Op? Los Angeles Times, 15 April 2001. Graduate School of International IGCC Washington Representative, at Relations and Pacific Studies, UC [email protected]; or Ron Bee, Richard FEINBERG. “San Diego's Role in International Trade.” San Diego Union- San Diego Scripps Institution of IGCC Development and External Tribune, 23 December 2001. Oceanography, Lawrence Livermore Affairs, at [email protected]. Richard FEINBERG. “Why Doha Will Do National Laboratory Center for Special IGCC Washington events What Seattle Did Not.” The Straits Times, 7 Global Security Research, the held in 2001 are listed below and fur- November 2001. Annenberg School for Communica- ther featured on pages 25 and 63. Richard FEINBERG and Kathy WARD. tion at USC, and the Washington, 26 March 2001. “Holding China Together? “San Diego and Hemispheric Trade.” San D.C.-based Nonproliferation Policy The Center, the Provinces, and the Diego Union-Tribune, 8 May 2001. Future.” Education Center. IGCC also enters David A. LAKE. “A World of Conflict into partnerships with appropriate Barry NAUGHTON, Graduate School of Without Borders.” San Diego Union- overseas academic institutions for its International Relations and Pacific Studies Tribune, 3 October 2001. (IR/PS), UC San Diego ongoing track-two projects. Susan SHIRK. “A New Relationship Particularly strong in this regard Between the United States, China?” San are information technology collabora- Diego Union-Tribune, 25 October 2001. 52 Dissemination Partner Institutions
tions. For example, until a decade ago, culated internationally among POLICY BRIEFS ISSN 1089- from the IGCC perspective Europe research institutions, businesses, and 8352 naturally remained at the core of “the government agencies. Providing Sandra JOIREMAN. 2001. Policy East-West divide.” Now, European opinion on current issues, reporting Brief 14: Good Fences Make Good integration, security relations within on ongoing research, encouraging and Neighbors. and among the Commonwealth of informing public debate on critical Independent States (CIS) states, and issues concerning global conflict and BOOKS the transformation of Eastern and cooperation, IGCC’s in-house publi- Richard ANDERSON, Jr., M. Steven Central European economies com- cations rapidly disseminate the poli- FISH, Stephen E. HANSON, and mand new attention at the nexus of e- cy-relevant results of academic Philip G. ROEDER. 2001. conomics and security. The Univer- endeavor. Substantial works are also Postcommunism and the Theory of sity of Ulster/UN University Initi- placed with international publishers, Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton ative on Conflict Resolution and peer-reviewed journals, and academic University Press. Ethnicity
53 Dissemination Publications
Joseph LEPGOLD and Miroslav Arena.” Physics in Perspective Revue Scientifique et Technique de la NINCIC. 2001. Beyond the Ivory Tower: 3:76–105. Défense 54 (December): 1–18. International Relations Theory and the Martin BECKSTROM. 2001. “The Akos RONA-TAS and Alya GUSEVA. Issue of Policy Relevance. New York: Great Silk Road Survey.” University of 2001. “Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Columbia University Press. California MRU News 1 (2): 1. Russian and American Credit Card Robert E. LITAN and Alice M. Scott A. BOLLENS. 2001. “City and Markets Compared.” American RIVLIN. 2001. Beyond the Dot.coms: Soul: Sarajevo, Johannesburg, Sociological Review 66 (5): 623–46. The Economic Promise of the Internet. Jerusalem, Nicosia.” Analysis of Urban Barry H. STEINER. 2001. “Preventive Washington, D.C.: Brookings Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 5 Diplomacy in the Endgame.” Global Institution Press. (2): 169–87. Society 15 (April): 173–200. Michael NAGLER. 2001. Is There No Jack HIRSHLEIFER. 2001. ———. 2001. “Diplomacy as Other Way: The Search for a Nonviolent “Appeasement: Can It Independent and Dependent Future. Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Hills Work?”American Economic Review Variable.” International Negotiation Books. Papers and Proceedings (May). 6:79–104. T. V. PAUL. 2001. Power Versus Jack HIRSHLEIFER and Evan MONOGRAPHS AND BOOK Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear OSBORNE. 2001. “Truth, Effort, and CHAPTERS Weapons. Toronto, Ont.: McGill- the Legal Battle.” Public Queens University Press Choice 108: 169–95. Scott A. BOLLENS. 2001. “The Role of T. V. PAUL and John A. HALL. 2001. David HUGHES. 2001. “Cadastral Public Policy: Belfast, Jerusalem, and International Order and the Future of Politics: The Making of Community- Johannesburg.” In Democracy at the World Politics. Cambridge: Based Resource Management in Local Level: The International IDEA Cambridge University Press. Zimbabwe and Mozambique.” Handbook on Participation, Representation, Conflict Management, T. V. PAUL, J. HARKNETT, and James Development and Change 32 (4): and Governance, edited by Timothy J. WIRTZ. 2001. The Absolute Weapon 741–68. Sisk and Igor Koryakov, 82–89. Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of . 2001. “Rezoned for Business: ——— Stockholm: Institute for Democracy Michigan Press. How Eco-Tourism Unlocked Black Farmland in Eastern Zimbabwe.” and Electoral Assistance. David PION-BERLIN, Felipe Jack HIRSHLEIFER. 2001. AGÜERO, J. Samuel FITCH, Wendy Journal of Agrarian Change 1 (4): 575–99. “Game-theoretic Interpretations of HUNTER, Ernesto LÓPEZ, Brian Commitment.” In Evolution and the Philip L. MARTIN and Michael S. LOVEMAN, David R. MARES, Capacity for Commitment, edited by TEITELBAUM. 2001. “The Mirage of Deborah L. NORDEN, and Harold A. Randolph M. Nesse. New York: Mexican Guest Workers.” Foreign TRINKUNAS. 2001. Civil-Military Russell Sage Foundation. Relations in Latin America: New Affairs 80 (6): 117–19. David HUGHES. 2001. “Water as a Analytical Perspectives. Durham: Afaf MELEIS. 2001. “Small Steps and Boundary: National Parks, Rivers, University of North Carolina Press. Giant Hopes: Violence on Women is and the Politics of Demarcation in More than Wife Battering.” Health Stephen M. SAIDEMAN. 2001. The Chimanimani, Zimbabwe.” In Care for Women International 22 (4). Ties That Divide: Ethnic Politics, Foreign Reflections on Water: New Approaches to Policy, and International Conflict. New Vladimir OBORONKO and Paula Transboundary Conflicts and York: Columbia University Press. POWERS. 2001. “Wired for Peace Cooperation, edited by Helen Ingram Irwin WALL. 2001. France, the United Project: International Diplomacy and and Joachim Blatter, 267–94. States, and the Algerian War. Berkeley: the Virtual Private Network.” IEEE Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Distributed Systems Online. University of California Press. Alan P. L. LIU. 2001. “Provincial Marguerite R. WALLER and Jennifer Michael A. OSBORNE. 2001. Identities and Political Cultures: RYCENGA, eds. 2001. Frontline “Acclimatizing the World: A History Modernism, Traditionalism, Feminisms: Women, War, and of the Paradigmatic Colonial Parochialism, and Separatism.” In Resistance. London: Routledge. Science.”Osiris 15:135–51. Chinese Political Culture 1989–2000, ARTICLES ———. 2001. “Identity and edited by Shiping Hua, 246–75. Distinctiveness in Nineteenth- Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe. Lawrence BADASH. 2001. “Nuclear Century French Naval Medicine.” Winter: Scientists in the Political
54 Dissemination IGCCOnline
David S. WOODRUFF. 2001. Full-Text Publications Richard FEINBERG. PP58: Building the “Sustainable Agriculture and and Abstracts APEC International Assessment Biodiversity Conservation.” In
55 Management 2001 Supporters
ISN Links Research Directors Updated daily, ISN Links serves as a clearing- IGCC’S RESEARCH DIRECTORS CONSULT with the house for Internet sites relevant to international director, steering committee, campus program relations and security studies. A comprehensive, heads and international advisory board to frame expert, juried links catalogue, with icon-based development goals and lead substantive UC annotation showing type and extent of linked system-wide research efforts within their areas materials, ISN Links saves researchers from sift- of competency. ing through piles of irrelevant material.
SIPRI-FIRST Peter F. COWHEY
his Ph.D. at the University of North Carolina at Pacific international affairs. Shirk was IGCC’s direc- Chapel Hill. His research and teaching have con- tor from 1991–97, where she founded the Northeast centrated on European affairs, with particular Asia Cooperation Dialogue. From July 1997 to focus on German, French, and Italian politics as September 2000, she served as the deputy assistant well as on issues of European integration. secretary for China in the bureau of East Asian and Chandler previously served as a guest professor Pacific Affairs in the U.S. Department of State. Shirk in Germany at Tübingen and Oldenburg is the author of How China Opened Its Door: The Universities. He is a member of the editorial Political Success of the PRC's Foreign Trade and advisory board of German Politics, a regional Investment Reforms (Brookings, 1994) and The director of the Conference Group on German Political Logic of Economic Reform in China (U. Politics, and has served on the board of directors California Press, 1993) and the editor of Power and of the Canadian Political Science Association. Prosperity: Economic and Security Linkages in the Asia He is the author of Public Policy and the Provincial Pacific (Transaction Publications, 1996). She has Powers (Mc-Graw-Hill, 1979), and co-editor of served on the board of directors for the National Federalism and the Role of the State (U. Toronto Committee on U.S.-China Relations, the editorial Press, 1987), and Challenges to Federalism: Policy- board of the American Political Science Review, The Making in Canada and the Federal Republic of Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, and is a member Germany (Institute of Intergovernmental Rela- of the Council on Foreign Relations. tions, 1989). Chandler shares the position of research director of international relations with Miles Kahler. Jeffrey VINCENT International Environmental Policy Jeff VINCENT is professor of environmental and Miles KAHLER development economics at the Graduate School of International Relations Miles KAHLER is Rohr Professor of Pacific Financial Summary International Relations at the Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies INCOME Fiscal Year 2000–2001 (IR/PS), UC San Diego, and interim director of INTRAMURAL FUNDS $2,216,837 the IGCC-affiliated Institute for International, UC Regents $ 895,641 Comparative, and Area Studies (IICAS) at UC Carry Forward $ 513,170 San Diego. From 1994–96 Kahler was Senior State of California $ 550,000 Fellow in International Political Economy at the General Funds $ 250,026 Council on Foreign Relations. His publications Other income $ 8,000 include Leadership Selection in the Major EXTRAMURAL FUNDS $1,950,252 Multilaterals (IIE, 2001); Legalization and World Carry Forward $ 297,611 Politics (co-editor, MIT Press, 2001); Capital Flows Extramural Grants $1,652,641 and Financial Crisis (ed., Cornell U. Press, 1998); TOTAL $4,167,089 and International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration (Brookings, 1995). Kahler EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 2000–2001 shares the position of research director of inter- Administration $ 944,610 national relations with William Chandler. Research/Extramural Grants/IGCC Grant $1,266,774 Awards to Campuses Susan SHIRK (Director’s discretionary funds awarded International Security to other campuses) Susan SHIRK is professor of political science at Other Functions $ 376,099 the Graduate School of International Relations (Conferences, Travel, Advisory Committees, and Pacific Studies (IR/PS) and in the Teaching Seminars, Publications, Development) Department of Political Science, UC San Diego. Unexpended Extramural/Admin. Funds 2000–01 $1,579,606 She is an Asia specialist, with an emphasis on TOTAL $4,167,089 Chinese politics, U.S–China relations, and
57 Management 2001 Steering Committee
International Relations and Pacific Studies UC Berkeley (IR/PS), UC San Diego. He joined IGCC in 2001 Beth SIMMONS is associate professor in the Political after serving as a fellow at the Harvard Institute Science Department at UC Berkeley. She received her for International Development (1990– Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1991. Her fields of 2001) and as an assistant professor at Michigan interest include international relations, international State University (1987–1990). His research focus- political economy, and international law. Simmons’ es on national resource and environmental man- current research focus is on the effects of international agement in developing countries, in particular law and institutions on state behavior and policy countries in Asia. In addition to his research, choice. Her publications include Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy During the Vincent has extensive experience on policy- Interwar Years, 1923–1939 (Princeton U. Press, 1994), advising and capacity-building projects spon- winner of the 1995 APSA Woodrow Wilson Award for sored by the World Bank, the Asian the best book published in the previous year in gov- Development Bank, USAID, the UN Commis- ernment, politics, or international relations. She has sion for Sustainable Development, the UN also published articles on international institutions in Development Program, the UN Food and International Organization and World Politics. Agriculture Organization, and other interna- tional organizations. He is lead author of UC Davis Environment and Development in a Resource-Rich Martin KENNY is professor of community studies Economy: Malaysia Under the New Economic Policy and development in the Human and Community (Harvard Studies in International Development, Development Department at UC Davis. He received 1997) and co-editor of the forthcoming Handbook his Ph.D. from Cornell University in 1984. His fields of of Environmental Economics (North-Holland, interest include technology and regional develop- 2002). ment, Japanese foreign direct investment, labor rela- tions, and biotechnology and society. He was the 2000 Arthur Andersen Distinguished Visitor Senior Project Steering Committee Director for the Berkeley Roundtable on the Inter- THE IGCC STEERING COMMITTEE is composed of national Economy (BRIE) at UC Berkeley. His most UC faculty from each campus and representa- recent books include Understanding Silicon Valley: The tives of the Livermore and Los Alamos National Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region (ed., Stanford, Laboratories. It advises the director on ongoing 2000); and Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System program activities and allocates fellowships and Its Transfer to the United States, coauthored with and grants. Richard Florida (Oxford, 1993).
Chair UC Irvine Helen INGRAM, School of Social Ecology, is Manuel PASTOR Jr., UC Santa Cruz, is the IGCC Warmington Endowed Chair of Social Ecology. She steering committee chair. Pastor is professor of Latin received her Ph.D. in Public Law and Government at American and Latino Studies and director of the Columbia University and for more than two decades Center for Justice, Tolerance and Community at UC taught at the University of Arizona, where she was Santa Cruz. He has carried out research in U.S. urban Director at the Udall Center for Studies in Public issues and economic development strategies in Latin Policy. Since moving to UC Irvine in 1995, she has pur- America. He is currently working on issues of envi- sued her long-term interests in transboundary envi- ronmental justice with the California Endowment and ronment and water policy. Among her publications on the California Policy Research Center. Pastor has pub- the subject are Reflections on Water: New Approaches to lished extensively on Latin American development Transboundary Conflicts and Cooperation (MIT Press, and is currently working on the political economy of 2000); and Divided Waters: Bridging the U.S./Mexico free trade in Mexico and Argentina as well as econom- Border (co-author, U. of Arizona Press, 1995). She was ic reform in Cuba. Pastor’s most recent books include the invited keynote speaker on institutional arrange- Modern Political Economy and Latin America: Theory and ments for the Second International River Management Policy (Westview Press), co-edited with Jeffrey Frieden Symposium in Brisbane, Australia, in September 1999. and Michael Tomz, and Regions That Work: How Cities and Suburbs Can Grow Together (U. of Minnesota Press), co-authored with Peter Dreier, Eugene Grigsby, and Marta Lopez-Garza.
58 Management 2001 Steering Committee
IGCC campus program directors and steering committee members at their joint meeting in San Francisco, October 2002.
UC Los Angeles cation is Postmodernism, Economics, and UC Santa Barbara Knowledge (Routledge, 1997), co-edited Richard STEINBERG, School of Law, Fredrik LOGEVALL, has taught in the with Jack Amariglio and David Ruccio. teaches international law and politics. He History Department at UC Santa Barbara is also a senior research fellow and former since 1992. His fields of interest are U.S. project director at the Berkeley Roundtable UC San Diego Foreign Relations and Twentieth-Century on the International Economy (BRIE) at Andrew MACINTYRE is interim dean of U.S. History. He has also been a co-leader UC Berkeley. Steinberg was named a the Graduate School of International in the Cold War History Group at UC MacArthur Fellow in International Relations & Pacific Studies (IR/PS), and Santa Barbara. This group provides a high- Security Affairs at the Center for associate professor of Pacific International ly intellectual forum for discussion among International Security Arms Control, Affairs. He also directs IR/PS’s ASEAN- students and faculty, and has been invigor- Stanford University. He has also worked Pacific Project. His fields of interest include ated by the addition of two dozen eminent as assistant general counsel to the United Southeast Asian comparative political scholars from outside UC Santa Barbara States Trade Representative in Washing- economy, with a regional focus on over the past three years. Logevall received ton, D.C. In spring 1997, Professor Stein- Indonesia. He has conducted extensive his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1993. His berg hosted a workshop on Trade and research in Indonesia, Thailand, South recent publications include Choosing War: Environment in the Americas. The pro- Korea, Vietnam, and the Philippines. The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of gram featured speakers from universities, MacIntyre served as Senior Lecturer at War In Vietnam (U. California Press, 1999). government offices, and private organiza- Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia, In 2000, he received the Pacific Coast tions throughout the Americas. from 1990–1994. He joined IR/PS in 1994. Branch Book Award from the Pacific Coast Branch of the American Historical UC Riverside UC San Francisco Association. Prof. Stephen CULLENBERG, chair of Judith JUSTICE, Institute for Health the Economics Department at UC River- Policy, is associate professor of medical UC Santa Cruz side, joined the steering committee in fall anthropology and health policy. Her re- Nirvikar SINGH is professor of economics 1999. From 1993–1999 he was director of search interests include international and at UC Santa Cruz. His major fields of inter- the IGCC-affiliated International Econ- domestic health policy, child health, repro- est include political economy, public omic Conflict and Cooperation Program at ductive health, comparative medical sys- finance, federalism, economic develop- UC Riverside. The program emphasized tems, the role of nongovernmental organi- ment, technology change and growth, the economic and political economy zations and development, health beliefs international and interstate water disputes, aspects of global cooperation. Cullenberg and practices in Asia, and immigrant and and water allocation. From 1992–1995, he is an expert in international political econ- refugee health. She was awarded the Full- served as chair of the Economics omy and Marxian economics and a mem- bright Senior Scholars Grant in 1998–1999 Department at Santa Cruz. In 1997, Singh ber of the editorial board for the journal for her work Re-examining the Fit Between In- served as a consultant to the World Bank Rethinking Marxism. His most recent publi- ternational Health Policies and Local Realities.
59 Management 2001 Campus Program Directory
on issues of local government reform and posia. For more information, contact UC Irvine water issues in India. He is a referee for the the respective campus office. Global Peace and Conflict Studies National Science Foundation and the
UC Riverside (IICAS) became the UCSD campus affiliate Prof. Mark JUERGENSMEYER, Chair in December 2001. Its director, Miles (805) 893-4718 Program on Global Studies Kahler, is a specialist in international rela- [email protected] Department of Political Science tions and international political economy. Debra NASH, Program Manager Watkins Hall 2219 His current research and teaching interests (805) 893-4718 Prof. Juliann E. ALLISON, Co-Director include globalization and governance, [email protected] (909) 787-4582 international relations of the Pacific region, [email protected] the evolution of the nation-state, interna- Mark Juergensmeyer is a professor and for- mer chair of the Department of Sociology Prof. Christopher CHASE-DUNN, tional institutions, and the political econo- at UC Santa Barbara. Juergensmeyer is my of international finance. Edited and Co-Director chair of the Global Peace and Security authored publications include Legalization (909) 787-2063 Program (GPS), IGCC’s affiliated campus and World Politics, Capital Flows and [email protected] program at UC Santa Barbara. He also cur- Shayna CONAWAY Financial Crises, and International Institu- rently serves as director of the Global and Center Administrator tions and the Political Economy of Integration. International Studies Program at UC Santa (909) 787-3594 From 1994 to 1996 he was Senior Fellow in Barbara, which houses GPS. His current [email protected] International Political Economy at the research interests include the comparative Council on Foreign Relations. Kahler is a Juliann E. Allison is assistant professor of study of religious terrorism, the study of member of the editorial board of the sociology of global religion, and ethno- political science and co-director of the International Organization and a member of graphic introductions to religion. Program on Global Studies at UC the Executive Committee of the Program Riverside. She received her Ph.D. from for International Studies in Asia. UCLA in 1995. She teaches international UC Santa Cruz political economy and environmental pol- UC San Francisco The Adlai E. Stevenson Program on itics. Professor Allison's most recent publi- Global Security cations include “Trade Liberalization and Program in Health Science and Human the Natural Environment: Conflict or Survival
61 Management 2001 Facilities
The Lawrence and Ewa Robinson Complex THE ROBINSON BUILDING COMPLEX (RBC), home to IGCC’s main administrative offices, sits on two acres at the northwest corner of UC San Diego. Located adjacent to the Institute of the Americas, the complex is a “campus within a campus,” and houses both IGCC and the Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies (IR/PS), the only professional school of international affairs in the UC system. Structures include a 300-seat auditorium, a com- puter laboratory, lecture halls, the IR/PS Library, student commons, faculty offices, and an administration/student services building. The complex is named in honor of Lawrence The Robinson Building Complex is home to the and Ewa Robinson, whose generous donation UC San Diego Graduate School of International helped to fund construction of the school, and Relations and Pacific Studies and IGCC’s main whose continuing support provides invaluable administrative offices. assistance to IR/PS students and programs. Photo: Alan Decker
UC Washington Academic Center Since 1997, IGCC has maintained offices in Washington, D.C., at the UC Washington Academic Center. The center moved to its brand-new facil- ity at 1608 Rhode Island Avenue, NW, in October 2001. The eleven-story, mixed-use facility serves both as residence for almost 300 UC students and home to the University’s academic programs in the nation’s capital. The center has several teaching venues, including a 96-seat auditori- um on the first floor, a multipurpose room that can be subdivided into three classrooms, a computer lab, a distance learning lab, two seminar rooms, and four conference rooms. All venues have access to the build- ing’s extensive array of multimedia, network, Internet, and video-con- ferencing services. The auditorium is designed to be a showcase for dis- tance learning technology. It is to be not only a teaching venue but also a place for lectures, academic symposia, forums of educators, national policymakers, and leaders, and virtual town meetings. Visiting IGCC faculty and students may reserve short-term office space in advance by contacting Margaret Ray at the IGCC Washington office. Doctoral dissertation students and faculty using the Library of Congress holdings can make arrangements through IGCC for the use of study carrels in the Library’s Jefferson Building. The new UC Washington Academic Center at 1608 Rhode Island Avenue, NW. Photo courtesy of UCDC.
62 Noteworthy IGCC Washington Event
LARRY BERMAN, AUTHOR of the highly acclaimed received his B.A. magna cum laude No Peace, No Honor: Nixon, Kissinger, and Betrayal from the American Univer-sity in in Vietnam, discussed the book and the research Washington, D.C., and his Ph.D. from behind his conclusions on 25 October 2001 at an Princeton University in 1977. He became an assistant professor of polit- IGCC-sponsored event. ical science at UC Davis the same year. The event, one of many planned by the IGCC Berman is the author or co-author of Washington office, was held at the newly- ten books and numerous articles. In opened University of California Washington addition, he has appeared on a num- Academic Center. Attendees were among the ber of broadcasts, including Bill first to participate in an event at the new facility, Moyers’ Public Broadcasting System which will be officially dedicated in April 2002. series, “The Public Mind.” In addition No Peace, No Honor offers extraordinary new to his work in political science, documentary evidence, including North Viet- Berman is an authority on integrating Larry BERMAN and reengineering liberal arts educa- namese accounts of the secret talks, to reveal the Photo: Staff tion with technology. He regularly true story behind the Vietnam peace process. presents seminars and workshops on the subject to educators across the United States, and has lectured in Larry BERMAN was appointed the first director of China, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands on the UC Washington Academic Center in September American politics, foreign policy, and multi-media 1999. Berman served as chairman of the UC Davis technology in the classroom. Political Science Department from 1989–1997. He
Washington, D.C., 25 October 2001 No Peace, No Honor, by Larry Berman
PARTICIPANTS Mike GRAVEL David OLIVE former U.S. Senator Fujitsu Corp. Karen AKERSON UC Office of the President Andrew JONES Gerhard PETERS Historian’s Office UC Santa Barbara Carole BLAIR Dept. of State UC Davis Prof. Herbert SCHANDLER Larry LAUERHAUS National Defense University John BRANDON UC Los Angeles Asia Society Hedrick SMITH Daniel LAWLER New York Times Bill BUR Historian’s Office Nancy SMITH Kurt CAMPBELL Dept. of State National Archives, CSIS Joshua LONDON Channa THREAT Jim DESVEAUX Jewish Policy Center UCDC UC Los Angeles/CAPPP Allen LOWE James THURBER Michael DOYLE Ashcraft and Girelle American University McClatchy Newspapers Matt MARTIN Andrew VINCENT Alan ELMAS Stimson Center Dept. of State UC Davis Joseph MCGHEE EAP Amb. H. FELDMAN IGCC Washington Office Carla WESLEY Journal of International Security Paul MILES UC Davis Affairs Princeton University Dean YAP Michael GILLETTE Tom OLIPHANT Dept. of State National Archives Boston Globe EAP Michael GLENNON Woodrow Wilson Center
63 Noteworthy Announcements
Upcoming Deadlines
Doctoral Fellowships, Faculty Research Grants, Visiting Scholar Program and Washington, D.C, Graduate Internships IGCC’s visiting scholar program facilitates independent in International Affairs (2002–03) research by scholars on leave from their home institutions. Applications for fellowships, research grants, and internships The institute offers no stipend, but does provide office space, are available annually in mid-November from IGCCOnline computing support, and Internet access. Space is limited, and under “Campus Programs,” or through any of the nine UC preference will be given to scholars whose research relates to campus program offices. These are available only to graduate ongoing projects at IGCC or who plan to work directly with a students and faculty within the University of California sys- faculty member at IGCC or the Graduate School of tem. Application deadlines are the end of January for intern- International Relations and Pacific Studies, UC San Diego. To ships and early February for dissertation fellowships and fac- apply, please send a current curriculum vitae, a brief project ulty research and teaching grants. Decisions are usually proposal, a statement indicating the applicant’s source of announced in mid-April. Applicants can find out more about funding, and two references to Peter Cowhey, Director. IGCC funding opportunities by emailing [email protected] Deadlines are rolling, with award announcements from for a current schedule of campus-based informational work- February through May 2002 for the 2002–03 academic year. shops. Noteworthy
Royal College of Defense Studies Luncheon. A tour party from SMITH (Political Science, UC San Diego) on democracy in the U.K. Royal College of Defense Studies (RCDS) visited Latin America. The event provided analysis of key foreign IGCC on 24 September 2001 for a luncheon discussion policy issues and an opportunity to build capacity in chaired by IGCC Director Peter COWHEY. The RCDS is the Canada and the United State for informed public engage- pre-eminent British defense college. The group’s visit to the ment in foreign policy development. United States was part of a one-year course aimed at senior New IGCC Washington Staff. IGCC is pleased to introduce serving officers from the armed forces of a wide range of Joseph MCGHEE, the new IGCC Washington Representa- countries, as well as police officers and civilian officials. The tive. McGhee serves as the key liaison between IGCC schol- course prepares participants to take up positions where they ars and the policy community in Washington, D.C. He has will provide advice to their respective governments on secu- been busy organizing events to bring IGCC research to pol- rity policy. The group was led by British Air Vice Marshal icymakers, implementing programs for UC faculty and stu- Tony NICHOLSON and included representatives from the dents at UCDC, and developing relationships between U.K. armed services and Ministry of Defense, as well as par- IGCC, government, nongovernmental organizations and ticipants from Egypt, Korea, Israel, Turkey, and Ukraine. foundations in Washington. McGhee has over 20 years of Britain and America Working Together in a World in Crisis. experience in international affairs. He most recently served IGCC sponsored a discussion 30 November 2001 with Sir as a European Security Affairs Consulate to the U.S. State Christopher MEYER, British Ambassador to the United Department. States, at the Graduate School of International Relations and We are also pleased to introduce McGhee’s assistant, Pacific Studies, UC San Diego. The discussion was moderat- Program Coordinator Margaret RAY, who joined the ed by Prof. William CHANDLER, IGCC co-Research Director Washington office on 27 November 2001. Ray recently grad- for International Relations. uated from New College, Sarasota, Florida, with a combined Foreign Policy Trends in the Bush Administration. IGCC and undergraduate degree in International Studies and Spanish. the Canadian Center for Foreign Policy hosted a roundtable She looks forward to working closely with IGCC in San discussion on the Bush administration’s foreign policy at Diego. UC San Diego 20 March 2001 . Presenters included Susan SHIRK (IGCC) on Asia and security issues, Richard FEINBERG (IR/PS) on summitry in the Americas, Herb YORK (Director Emeritus, IGCC) on ballistic missile defense, Willliam CHANDLER (IGCC) on EU integration, and Peter
64