Setting the Context 11
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East River Basin District
South East River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B: Sub Areas in the South East river basin district March 2016 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2016 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1 Sub-areas in the South East river basin district .............................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Flood Risk Areas ......................................................................................................................... 9 Management catchments ............................................................................................................ 9 2 Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk for the Brighton and Hove Flood Risk Area.......................................................................................................................... -
Using High-Frequency Phosphorus Monitoring for Water Quality Management: a Case Study of the Upper River Itchen, UK
Environ Monit Assess (2020) 192:184 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0 Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK Gary R. Fones & Adil Bakir & Janina Gray & Lauren Mattingley & Nick Measham & Paul Knight & Michael J. Bowes & Richard Greenwood & Graham A. Mills Received: 16 July 2019 /Accepted: 5 February 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total par- high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five ticulate phosphorus) present and how these varied tempo- rally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with Electronic supplementary material The online version of this the available Environment Agency total reactive phospho- article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. rus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the : G. R. Fones (*) A. Bakir major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth PO1 3QL, UK the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to e-mail: [email protected] wash off from agricultural activities. -
Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. by Dr
Streams, Ditches and Wetlands in the Chichester District. By Dr. Carolyn Cobbold, BSc Mech Eng., FRSA Richard C J Pratt, BA(Hons), PGCE, MSc (Arch), FRGS Despite the ‘duty of cooperation’ set out in the National Planning Policy Framework1, there is mounting evidence that aspects of the failure to deliver actual cooperation have been overlooked in the recent White Paper2. Within the subregion surrounding the Solent, it is increasingly apparent that the development pressures are such that we risk losing sight of the natural features that underscore not only the attractiveness of the area but also the area’s natural health itself. This paper seeks to focus on the aquatic connections which maintain the sub-region’s biological health, connections which are currently threatened by overdevelopment. The waters of this sub-region sustain not only the viability of natural habitat but also the human economy of employment, tourism, recreation, leisure, and livelihoods. All are at risk. The paper is a plea for greater cooperation across the administrative boundaries of specifically the eastern Solent area. The paper is divided in the following way. 1. Highlands and Lowlands in our estimation of worth 2. The Flow of Water from Downs to Sea 3. Wetlands and Their Global Significance 4. Farmland and Fishing 5. 2011-2013: Medmerry Realignment Scheme 6. The Protection and Enhancement of Natural Capital in The Land ‘In Between’ 7. The Challenge to Species in The District’s Wildlife Corridors 8. Water Quality 9. Habitat Protection and Enhancement at the Sub-Regional Level 10. The policy restraints on the destruction of natural capital 11. -
Thames Basin Heath
Appendix JO5: Countryside Character – Volume 7: South-East and London’ National Character Area 129: Thames Basin Heath 59 Countryside Character Volume 7: South East & London The character of England’s natural and man-made landscape 60 Contents page Chairman’s Foreword 4 Areas covered by more than one 1 volume are shown Introduction 5 hatched 2 3 The character of England 5 The Countryside Agency and 8 4 countryside character 5 6 How we have defined the character of 8 England’s countryside – The National Mapping project 8 7 – Character of England map: a joint approach 11 8 – Describing the character of England 11 The character of England: shaping the future 11 This is volume 7 of 8 covering the character of England Character Areas page page 81 Greater Thames Estuary 13 119 North Downs 94 88 Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands 18 120 Wealden Greensand 99 90 Bedfordshire Greensand Ridge 25 121 Low Weald 106 91 Yardley–Whittlewood Ridge 30 122 High Weald 111 95 Northamptonshire Uplands 35 123 Romney Marshes 116 107 Cotswolds 40 124 Pevensey Levels 121 108 Upper Thames Clay Vales 45 125 South Downs 125 109 Midvale Ridge 52 126 South Coast Plain 131 110 Chilterns 56 127 Isle of Wight 137 111 Northern Thames Basin 62 128 South Hampshire Lowlands 142 112 Inner London 73 129 Thames Basin Heaths 146 113 North Kent Plain 76 130 Hampshire Downs 152 114 Thames Basin Lowlands 80 131 New Forest 156 115 Thames Valley 84 132 Salisbury Plain and West Wiltshire Downs 162 116 Berkshire and Marlborough Downs 89 134 Dorset Downs and Cranborne Chase 167 135 Dorset Heaths 172 Acknowledgements The Countryside Agency acknowledges the contribution to this publication of a great many individuals, partners and organisations without which it would not have been possible. -
The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of -
England's Light Pollution and Dark Skies
England‘s Light Pollution and Dark Skies Final Report Prepared by LUC May 2016 Project Title: England‘s Light Pollution and ark Skies Client: Campaign to Protect Rural England Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 30.03.16 First draft iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 2.0 13.04.16 Second draft iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 3.0 25.04.16 raft final report iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern 4.0 31.05.16 Final Report iana Manson (ate Ahern (ate Ahern CPRE Light Pollution Mapping,1).doc. Last saved: 0300602016 12:23 England‘s Light Pollution and Dark Skies Prepared by LUC May 2016 Planning 1 E2A LUC LON ON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England esign 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management N61 17 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T 944 ,0-20 7383 5784 London N61 17 Mapping 1 3isualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100A recycled paper Contents Introduction 2 Creating a National Map 2 Obtaining night light imagery from satellites 2 Selecting a baseline dataset and processing the data 3 The national map 3 3 Headline findings 5 National findings 5 Regional findings 6 4 Detailed analysis 0 County 10 istricts ,including Unitary Authorities, London Boroughs and Metropolitan Boroughs) 11 Protected Landscapes 13 National Character Areas 17 5 Case studies 2 2nvestigating change over time 21 6 Supporting tools and information 24 Potential uses for the updated light pollution maps 24 -
Appendices A
Appendix A Appendix A - Planning Policy - Under Review Propsed Planning Policies A.1 For details of Eastleigh Borough Council Local Plan 2011-2029 proposals, see www.eastleigh.gov.uk/localplan 178 Landscape Character Assessment for Eastleigh Borough Appendix B Appendix B - Green Infrastructure The Green Infrastructure Framework B.1 Theme I: Sustainable economic development, attractive workplaces and desirable tourist destinations Objective 1 Ensure the design of existing and new workplaces leads to diverse and attractive green environments for businesses wishing to relocate, grow or set-up in the PUSH sub-region. Objective 2 Complement the resources of existing visitor destinations, facilitate increased tourism opportunities and enhance the visitor economy. Objective 3 Promote businesses and markets that provide low carbon, multifunctional and cost-effective delivery of Green Infrastructure Themes and Objectives. B.2 Theme II: Maximising biodiversity opportunities, adapting to change and protecting European sites Objective 4 Conserve and enhance existing biodiversity: restoring habitats according to Biodiversity Opportunity Area priorities helping deliver Habitat Action Pans and Species Action Plans in BAP and improving connectivity of habitats at all scales and levels of designation. Objective 5 Contribute to the mitigation of the impacts of growth on European sites using buffer zones, providing alternative recreation destinations and reducing the effects of coastal squeeze by providing new habitat sites. B.3 Theme III: Landscape quality and diversity, distinctive features, cultural heritage and appreciation of sense of place Objective 6 Protect the unique quality, diversity and distinctiveness of the sub-region’s landscape and heritage. Objective 7 Maintain and where necessary improve the identity and character of settlements in urban and rural locations. -
3C: Itchen Valley
3C: ITCHEN VALLEY Valley floor in downland setting between Itchen Abbas and Ovington. Permanent pasture, numerous small woods and scattered individual trees, few hedges. Ovington – Clear chalk streams, oftenValley floor– Lower reaches urban There are numerous historic mills wooded banks. edge, pony paddocks and wooded and bridges – along the Itchen. (from ridge backdrop at Bishopstoke. SDILCA) Cheriton – canalised section of theItchen Valley Country park; sluice as Playing fields with poplar windbreaks Itchen on the left. part of restored water meadows. in Lower Itchen Valley. Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment Itchen Valley 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area includes the river valley floor and its sides which make up the visual envelope of the valley. The valley tops are defined approximately where there is a break/slackening in slope angle. The southern boundary is formed at the County/Southampton unitary edge. The upper most reaches of the valley follow three spring fed tributaries/headwaters, which join close to New Arlesford namely the Candover stream to the north, River Arle to the east and Cheriton stream to the south. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Open Downs, Downland Mosaic Large Scale, Downland Mosaic Small Scale, River Valley Floor, Lowland Mosaic Medium Scale, Lowland Mosaic Small Scale, Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated, Settlement. 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: Winchester CC Eastleigh BC Upper Itchen Valley Broom Hill Farmland and Woodland Lower Itchen Valley Upper Itchen Valley Floodplain Lower Itchen Valley Floodplain Eastleigh Airport Itchen Valley Sports Pitches The extent of the valley sides is comparable with the two Itchen valley character areas in the Winchester assessment. -
The State of England's Chalk Streams
FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site. -
Hedge End SDA Landscape Appraisal Summary
North-North East of Hedge End Strategic Development Area SUMMARY LANDSCAPE APPRAISAL Introduction The South East Plan (published July 2009) refers to the allocation of a Strategic Development Area (SDA) in close proximity to Southampton ‘within the broad location to the North North/East of Hedge End’ (Policy SH2). The policy requires that areas of open land between the SDA and neighbouring settlements will be identified and maintained in order to prevent coalescence between the SDA and existing settlements and, additionally, to protect the separate identities of individual settlements. As part of the LDF work for Winchester District, it is expected that specific boundaries indicating these areas of ‘open land’ would be defined in DPDs (Development Plan Documents) and will include land which has a predominantly open and/or rural appearance. This landscape appraisal forms part of the wider evidence base that will be used to assess constraints and opportunities and influence the location of these boundaries. The SDA study area is broadly defined as the land between Botley, Hedge End, Horton Heath, Durley and Curdridge. The SDA crosses the district boundary between Eastleigh Borough Council and Winchester City Council. Since this landscape appraisal was started the South East Plan has been revoked by Government. The future of the SDA proposal is therefore uncertain, but the landscape appraisal has been concluded and published in order to be able to inform any future decisions about the location of an SDA or other major development in the area. Methodology The appraisal is a combination of field work/professional judgement resulting from a visual site assessment carried out in 2009/2010 and a desk top study based on GIS constraint maps and recognised documents, some with recommendations as listed below. -
Appendix 2: Plans & Programmes Review
Appendix 2 HRA Screening Report: Winchester Draft Local Plan Part 2 Appendix 2: Plans & Programmes Review Regional South East River Basin Management Plan, December 2009. Document Details Potential impacts that could cause ‘in-combination’ effects The River Basin Management Plan describes the main issues for A Habitats Regulations Assessment of this plan has been carried out to the South East river basin district and highlights some key consider whether it is likely to have a significant effect on any Natura 2000 actions proposed for dealing with them set out in brief the sites. The assessment was undertaken by the Environment Agency, in actions the EA propose should be taken. The document sets consultation with Natural England. out detailed proposals for the next six years and beyond. The assessment concluded that the river basin management plan is unlikely Key actions for the Test and Itchen Catchment are: to have any significant negative effects on any Natura 2000 sites. The plan itself does not require further assessment under the Habitats Regulations. The Environment Agency will modify abstraction licences This conclusion is reliant on the fact that before any measures in the plan and discharge consents to ensure no adverse impact on are implemented they must be subject to the requirements of the Habitats the River Itchen Special Area of Conservation. Regulations. Any plans, project or permissions required to implement the Southern Water will improve sewage works at three measures must undergo an appropriate assessment if they are likely to a locations including Eastleigh and Millbrook to reduce levels have a significant effect. -
127. Isle of Wight Area Profile: Supporting Documents
National Character 127. Isle of Wight Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 127. Isle of Wight Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.