Annual Report 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 FINMECCANICA ANNUAL REPORT 2011 helicopters space AgustaWestland Telespazio AgustaWestland Tilt-Rotor Company Thales Alenia Space NHIndustries defence systems defence and security Oto Melara electronics WASS DRS Technologies MBDA SELEX Elsag SELEX Service Management energy SELEX Galileo Ansaldo Energia SELEX Sistemi Integrati transportation aeronautics AnsaldoBreda Alenia Aermacchi Ansaldo STS SuperJet International BredaMenarinibus ATR Eurofighter GmbH Owned company Joint venture At 31 March 2012 FINMECCANICA GROUP FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 11% 22% 5% 7% REVENUES 2011 6% €bil. 17.3 15% 34% 15% 22% 7% NEW ORDERS 2011 6% €bil. 17.4 5% 28% 17% This Annual Report 2011 has been translated into English solely for the convenience of the international reader. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms used in the Italian version of the Report and the English version, the Italian version shall prevail, as the Italian version constitutes the sole official document. CONTENTS BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 12 REPORT ON OPERATIONS AT 31 DECEMBER 2011 Group results and financial position 18 “Non-GAAP” performance indicators 32 Transactions with related parties 33 Finmeccanica and the commercial scenario 36 Performance by division 42 HELICOPTERS 42 DEFENCE AND SECURITY ELECTRONICS 46 AERONAUTICS 54 SPACE 60 DEFENCE SYSTEMS 64 ENERGY 68 TRANSPORTATION 74 OTHER ACTIVITIES 78 Reconciliation of net profit and shareholders’ equity of the Group Parent with the consolidated figures at 31 December 2011 82 Significant events in 2011 and events subsequent to closure of the accounts 82 Finmeccanica and risk management 87 Finmeccanica and the environment 92 Finmeccanica and Research and Development 99 Finmeccanica: Human Resources 114 Finmeccanica: Security Policy Statement (SPS) 125 Incentive plans (stock-option and stock-grant plans) 125 Finmeccanica and the financial market 130 Corporate Governance Report and Shareholder Structure 134 Outlook 203 ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 31 DECEMBER 2011 Separate Income Statement 209 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 209 Consolidated Balance Sheet 210 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 211 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity 212 Notes to the consolidated financial statements at 31 December 2011 213 1. General information 213 2. Form, content and applicable accounting standards 213 3. Accounting policies adopted 213 4. Significant issues and critical estimates by management 235 5. Effects of changes in accounting policies adopted 237 6. Significant non-recurring events or transactions 237 7. Segment information 238 8. Intangible assets 240 9. Property, plant and equipment 244 10. Investment properties 245 11. Equity investments 245 12. Business combinations 247 13. Financial transactions with related parties 248 14. Receivables and other non-current assets 252 15. Inventories 252 16. Contract work in progress and advances received 253 17. Trade and financial receivables 253 18. Current financial assets at fair value 253 19. Income Tax receivables and payables 254 20. Other current assets 254 21. Cash and cash equivalents 254 22. Shareholders’ equity 255 23. Borrowings 256 24. Provisions for risks and charges and contingent liabilities 260 25. Employee liabilities 267 26. Other current and non-current liabilities 270 27. Trade payables 271 28. Derivatives 271 29. Guarantees and other commitments 273 30. Transactions with related parties 274 31. Revenue 276 32. Other operating income (expenses) 276 33. Raw materials and consumables used and purchase of services 277 34. Personnel costs 277 35. Amortisation, depreciation and impairment 279 36. Work performed by the Group and capitalised 279 37. Finance income and costs 279 38. Share of profit (loss) of equity accounted investments 281 39. Income taxes 281 40. Discontinued operations and assets held for sale 282 41. Jointly-controlled entities 282 42. Earnings (losses) per share 283 43. Cash flow from operating activities 283 44. Financial risk management 284 45. Information pursuant to Art. 149-duodecies of the CONSOB Issuer Regulation 293 46. Remuneration to key management personnel 294 Certification on the consolidated financial statements pursuant to Art. 154-bis, paragraph 5 of Legislative Decree 58/98 as amended 295 ATTACHMENTS Auditors’ Report on the consolidated financial statements at 31 December 2011 297 List of equity investments pursuant to Art. 125 of CONSOB resolution 11971 301 Letter to shareholders Dear shareholders and stakeholders, during the lifespan of a company, it is necessary to regularly “take stock” of the situation: examine the operating conditions, the effectiveness of the decisions made, the accuracy of the strategies outlined, and finally, the correspondence of the path followed to the intended objectives. This is important, not only to highlight possible wrong turns that may need correcting, but also and above all to take into account the gap between the operational conditions initially expected, and those that, due to factors outside the company’s control, actually occurred. Giuseppe Orsi Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The world in which we are operating presents a succession of events which change the operating backdrop, challenge the ability of businesses to foresee them and force decisions and consequential actions. The downgrading of bonds issued by some western countries and the falling of regimes in North Africa, along with the consequent progressive deterioration of current economic relations, are just two examples that represent both the intensity and the speed of the change affecting the current political and economic scenario, although seen as one of the most stable orders, and the unpredictability of factors that make up the general operational framework of businesses. This particularly affects companies like those in our Group which operate in global markets and in sectors where success depends on the ability to industrialise progress in scientific knowledge and in technological applications, adapting them to the increasingly complex requirements of the customer. The financial statements we are submitting formalise, in economic terms, the results of the decision to take action now in order to be able to move forward and confront hic et nunc the problems which have emerged from a rigorous revision of the operating conditions of our Group companies, and from a “brave” identification of the necessary changes that need to be made to past strategic decisions. 8 FINMECCANICA ANNUAL REPORT 2011 It is important to underline that this decision is coherent with an understanding of Finmeccanica’s mission, which goes further than the ability to generate profits and value for shareholders in the short term. The safeguarding of a stable balance sheet and sufficient profitability for shareholders are medium and long-term objectives, the pursuit of which is a primary component of the mandate assigned to me and to my Board of Directors. In a wider understanding of Finmeccanica’s mission, a stable balance sheet and profitability are conditions that enable us to maintain and strengthen our leading role in the domestic industrial manufacturing markets, positioned in the most advanced technological frontiers. This is a role which Finmeccanica has performed throughout its history, not only through the activities of its subsidiaries but also through the hundreds of SMEs which make up its satellite industries. By working with the Group, these companies gain expertise, know how, and technical and technological skills which help them grow and become independent players in the market, and drive them to gain added value and to contribute to the advancement of the country’s industrial system. This is the reason why it was deemed necessary to look to the future with a deeper awareness in order to guarantee Finmeccanica a stable balance sheet and profitability that is sustainable over time. In the 2011 financial statements we have taken into account the changing market conditions which have impacted the profitability outlook of some assets, adapting their book value to more realistic levels and making it easier to measure their future performance. We emphasise that we have also decided to go ahead with plans to review the Group’s activities. Over the past few years, Finmeccanica has undertaken, partly through several important acquisitions, a strategy focused on activities in sectors where it can achieve and strengthen its leadership position sustaining the necessary level of investment. The decision to exit certain sectors in which the Group operates derives from an inability to be competitive in the medium-term without necessary investment, which we cannot continue to guarantee in the current climate. This is the reason why, in the short term, we will carry out selective divestments in certain areas. However, this will not mean that we will disregard them, on the contrary, our recent efforts show that we are trying to revive these businesses although we must acknowledge that these sectors can only be fully improved by those possessing the essential economies of scale and long-term commitment to investments, and we believe this would be better undertaken by those with this usage as their core business. The size and sharpness of the competition, in fact impose a more selective idea of the meaning of “core” in terms of technological commitment and specialisation of investments to keep the portfolio of activities competitive. It is for this reason
Recommended publications
  • Feasibility Study – Final Report
    RADAR IN-FILL FOR GREATER WASH AREA Feasibility Study – Final Report CONTRACT NUMBER: ED02698 URN NUMBER: 07/1442 COWRIE INFILL-02-2007 Radar In-fill for Greater Wash Area Feasibility Study - Final Report David J Bannister 31 August 2007 This report has been commissioned by COWRIE Ltd © COWRIE Ltd, 2007 Published by COWRIE Ltd. This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium. It may only be re-used accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as COWRIE Ltd copyright and use of it must give the title of the source publication. Where third party copyright material has been identified, further use of that material requires permission from the copyright holders concerned. ISBN: 978-0-9554279-6-1 Bannister, D.J.(2007) Radar In-fill for Greater Wash Area Feasibility Study. (QinetiQ Report No. ED02698) Commissioned by COWRIE Ltd. and BERR (INFILL-02-07). Copies available from: www.offshorewind.co.uk E-mail: [email protected] Contact details: QinetiQ Ltd. Malvern Technology Centre, Malvern, Worcestershire WR14 3PS United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1684 894000 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.qinetiq.com Greater Wash In-fill Radar Feasibility Study – Final Report Table of Contents Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. III LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ IV TABLE OF TABLES .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Italy at a Glance Materials to the Highest Levels and Hence “The 787 Represents Today the High Strategy
    “ Italy is an extremely important U.S. ally and a valued customer and industrial partner in both the commercial and defense markets.” – Rinaldo Petrignani, president of Boeing Italy PHOTO ILLUSTRATION: (Far left) A Boeing 787 Dreamliner flies above Rome’s Colosseum.BRANDON LUONG/BOEING; COLOSSEUM PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK; 787 DREAMLINER PHOTO: BOEING PHOTOS: (Above, from left) A 787 composite fuselage barrel is loaded into the Dreamlifter at the Alenia Aermacchi facility in Grottaglie, located in Italy’s Taranto province. ALENIA AERMACCHI Rinaldo Petrignani, president of Boeing Italy. BOEING (Left) A trio of Alenia employees work in the lower portion of a 787 barrel in Grottaglie. ALENIA AERMACCHI technological expertise in composite Italian Research Office near Naples. president of Business Development and Italy at a glance materials to the highest levels and hence “The 787 represents today the high Strategy. Italy is Boeing’s second-largest to become even stronger and more point of the intense relationship that Boeing supplier in Europe, excluding engine Official name: Italian Republic competitive as a global player in the has been able to develop with the Italian purchases, he said. Location: Southern Europe, a peninsula aerostructures industry.” air industry: a relationship which, as every “Italy represents both an important mar- extending to the Mediterranean Sea; Viva l’Italia Alenia also has made horizontal stabiliz- relationship, has also had its difficulties, but ket for our business units and an important neighbors include France, Switzerland, Boeing and Italy enjoy strong ties and Austria and Slovenia ers for the 787 in Italy, as well as radomes, which constantly proceeds and progresses industrial and research partner,” Hill said.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore, 16 February 2012
    Farnborough, July 14, 2014 ATR: 144 firm orders, new sales record for the first half of the year The aircraft manufacturer has also taken options for 112 additional aircraft At the Farnborough Airshow, the turboprop aircraft manufacturer ATR this morning announced that it has taken firm orders for 144 aircraft (119 ATR 72-600 and 25 ATR 42-600), with options for 112 additional aircraft, since the beginning of the year. This year's contracts, of which many will be revealed during the week of the show, represent a total value of over US$3.45 billion (US$6 billion including options). These sales represent 150% compared to the total sales for the year 2013. They will allow ATR to further strengthen its leading position on the market for regional aviation, and thus confirm the predominance of turboprop aircraft, and particularly those of ATR, over short distances. Sales for the first half of the year highlight the appeal of the ATR '-600's for regional companies and the leasing company community, attracted by the economic and environmental performance of the aircraft, their technical reliability and their high standard of comfort. This year, the ATR '-600's have also passed the symbolic mark of 500 firm orders since their launch at the end of 2007. ATR's backlog currently stands at 325 aircraft to be delivered in the coming years, a new record, representing a value of US$8 billion. On the back of this sales performance in the first half the year, ATR has increased its end of 2013 backlog by around 45%, seeing production ensured for almost 4 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanks a Million, Tornado
    Aug 11 Issue 39 desthe magazine for defenceider equipment and support Thanks a million, Tornado Fast jets in focus − Typhoon and Tornado impress See inside Welcome Warrior Goliath’s The future Warfare goes Voyager returns to war giant task is now on screen lockheedmartin.com/f35 NOT JUSTAN AIRCRAFT, THE UK’SAIRCRAFT The F-35 Lightning II isn’t just a cutting-edge aircraft. It also demonstrates the power of collaboration. Today, a host of UK companies are playing their part in developing and building this next-generation F-35 fi ghter. The F-35 programme is creating thousands of jobs throughout the country, as well as contributing LIGHTNINGLIGHTNING IIII to UK industrial and economic development. It’s enhancing the UK’s ability to compete in the global technology marketplace. F-35 Lightning II. Delivering prosperity and security. UNITED KINGDOM THE F-35 LIGHTNING II TEAM NORTHROP GRUMMAN BAE SYSTEMS PRATT & WHITNEY LOCKHEED MARTIN 301-61505_NotJust_Desider.indd 1 7/14/11 2:12 PM FRONTISPIECE 3 lockheedmartin.com/f35 Jackal helps keep the peace JACKAL CUTS a dash on Highway 1 between Kabul and Kandahar, one of the most important routes in Afghanistan. Soldiers from the 9th/12th Royal Lancers have been helping to keep open a section of the road which locals use to transport anything from camels to cars. The men from the Lancers have the tough task of keeping the highway open along with members of 2 Kandak of the Afghan National Army, who man checkpoints along the road. NOT JUSTAN AIRCRAFT, Picture: Sergeant Alison Baskerville, Royal Logistic Corps THE UK’SAIRCRAFT The F-35 Lightning II isn’t just a cutting-edge aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • EFC JIP CBRN Workshop
    EFC JIP CBRN Workshop Finmeccanica areas of interest Michele Genisio Brussels - September 15, 2011 Contents Contents 1. Finmeccanica key data 2010 2. Proposed areas of investigation Commercial in Confidence 1 - Finmeccanica Key Data 2010 FY2010 FY2009 Net Profit 557 M€ 718 M€ Revenues € 18.695 m Order Intake 22,5 B€ 21,1 B€ Employees 75,197 73,056 R & D 2.0 B€ 1.98 B€ DEFENSE AND DEFENSE AERONAUTICS HELICOPTERS TRANSPORT ENERGY SPACE SECURITY SYSTEMS ELECTRONICS 2.809 M€ 3.644 M€ 1.962 M€ 7.137 M€ 1.210 M€ 1.413 M€ 925 M€ . Alenia Aeronautica . AgustaWestland . AnsaldoBreda . DRS Technologies . Oto Melara . Ansaldo Energia . Telespazio . Alenia Aermacchi . BAAC . Ansaldo STS . ElsagDatamat . WASS . Ansaldo Fuel Cells . Thales Alenia Space . SuperJet . BredaMenarini . Selex . MBDA . Ansaldo Nucleare Communications International bus . Selex Galileo . ATR . Selex Sistemi . Eurofighter GmbH Integrati 100% owned by Finmeccanica . Selex Service Management JVs Finmeccanica view Emerging requirements in the CBRN area: C and B detectors • Wide threat range • Speed of Response • Low Detection Levels • Threat Identification M&S of CBRN architectures • representing the whole process, from threat to recovery • enabling military-civil interaction • multi-threat scenarios. M&S of CBRN Architectures OBJECTIVES Modelling & Simulation of a CBRN Architecture representing: - Environment: both predictable (terrain characteristics, urban context, road network, etc) and unpredictable (crowd behaviour, humand behaviour, weather etc ) aspects - Responders:
    [Show full text]
  • Weapon System of Choice 38 New Eurofighter Typhoon Aircraft for the Luftwaffe 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3
    PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES JANUARY 2021 Chain Reaction Pilot Brief: Interoperability Eurofighter and FCAS Weapon System of Choice 38 new Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft for the Luftwaffe 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3 Contents Programme News & Features January 2021 Welcome 4 Weapon System of Choice Airbus’ Head of Combat Aircraft Systems Kurt Rossner discusses the full implications of Germany’s decision to replace its existing Tranche 1 aircraft under the Quadriga programme. Cover: © Picture: images.art.design. GmbH, 12 Chain Reaction Lucas Westphal We speak to four businesses across Europe about the importance of the Eurofighter Typhoon programme for the Looking back, 2020 was a year few of us will ever The Eurofighter programme supports over 400 business- defence industry and the enriched technology capabilities forget. Because of the impact of the Covid-19 es across Europe, sustaining more than 100,000 jobs. it has helped bring about. pandemic we all faced huge professional and personal That’s why in this edition we shine the spotlight on some Eurofighter World is published by challenges. What stood out for me was the way every- of those supply chain businesses. Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH 18 Mission Future: Eurofighter and FCAS one involved in the Eurofighter project worked closer PR & Communications In the first of series of exclusive articles our experts exam- together than ever before to deliver. Elsewhere in the magazine we examine Eurofighter’s Am Söldnermoos 17, 85399 Hallbergmoos [email protected] ine Eurofighter’s place alongside a next generation fighter place alongside a next gen- in the future operating environment. Germany’s decision to replace eration fighter in the future Editorial Team Tony Garner its existing Tranche 1 aircraft battlespace.
    [Show full text]
  • RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War
    RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War INCLUDING Lightning Canberra Harrier Vulcan www.keypublishing.com RARE IMAGES AND PERIOD CUTAWAYS ISSUE 38 £7.95 AA38_p1.indd 1 29/05/2018 18:15 Your favourite magazine is also available digitally. DOWNLOAD THE APP NOW FOR FREE. FREE APP In app issue £6.99 2 Months £5.99 Annual £29.99 SEARCH: Aviation Archive Read on your iPhone & iPad Android PC & Mac Blackberry kindle fi re Windows 10 SEARCH SEARCH ALSO FLYPAST AEROPLANE FREE APP AVAILABLE FOR FREE APP IN APP ISSUES £3.99 IN APP ISSUES £3.99 DOWNLOAD How it Works. Simply download the Aviation Archive app. Once you have the app, you will be able to download new or back issues for less than newsstand price! Don’t forget to register for your Pocketmags account. This will protect your purchase in the event of a damaged or lost device. It will also allow you to view your purchases on multiple platforms. PC, Mac & iTunes Windows 10 Available on PC, Mac, Blackberry, Windows 10 and kindle fire from Requirements for app: registered iTunes account on Apple iPhone,iPad or iPod Touch. Internet connection required for initial download. Published by Key Publishing Ltd. The entire contents of these titles are © copyright 2018. All rights reserved. App prices subject to change. 321/18 INTRODUCTION 3 RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War cramble! Scramble! The aircraft may change, but the ethos keeping world peace. The threat from the East never entirely dissipated remains the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercially Available Low Probability of Intercept Radars and Non-Cooperative ELINT Receiver Capabilities
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Reports and Technical Reports All Technical Reports Collection 2014-09 Commercially Available Low Probability of Intercept Radars and Non-Cooperative ELINT Receiver Capabilities Heinbach, Kathleen Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, Center for Joint Services Electronic Warfare http://hdl.handle.net/10945/43575 NPS-EC-14-003 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE LOW PROBABILITY OF INTERCEPT RADARS AND NON-COOPERATIVE ELINT RECEIVER CAPABILITIES by Kathleen Heinbach, Rita Painter, Phillip E. Pace September 2014 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From-To) 30-09-2014 Technical Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Commercially Available Low Probability of Intercept Radars and Non-Cooperative ELINT Receiver Capabilities 5b.
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 Finmeccanica
    HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AT 30 JUNE 2013 FINMECCANICA Disclaimer This Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 has been translated into English solely for the convenience of the international reader. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms used in the Italian version of the report and the English version, the Italian version shall prevail, as the Italian version constitutes the sole official document. CONTENTS BOARDS AND COMMITTEES ...................................................................................................... 4 REPORT ON OPERATIONS AT 30 JUNE 2013 .......................................................................... 5 Group results and financial position in the first half of 2013 .................................................................. 5 Outlook ................................................................................................................................................. 12 “Non-GAAP” alternative performance indicators ................................................................................. 22 Industrial and financial transactions ...................................................................................................... 26 Corporate Governance .......................................................................................................................... 29 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 30 JUNE 2013 ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Publisher Will Re-Type the Main Title, Author
    ITEC 2019 M-346 ITS Interoperability by Design ITEC 2019 – M-346 ITS Interoperability by Design Abstract — The world of military training is by nature conservative, typically customers planning future training systems base their ideas and expectations on how were trained. M-346 ITS design and development have been built around an innovative training paradigm where the Aircraft, the Ground Based Training Systems and the Interoperability functionality are strictly connected. Based on a number of developments and experiences, the user community is seeking to blur the boundaries to get more training value from an Interoperable System. Furthermore, the introduction of advanced Fighters (4th and 5th generation) implies a new Concept of Operations (CONOPS) of level of interoperability during training joint events. 1 M-346 Advanced Trainer Aircraft and LVC is definitively a System-of-System made by the Interoperability most modern system integration technologies and it is one of the core components of the ITS that includes real aircraft, simulators and additional training aids and The M-346 Advanced Trainer Aircraft has been ground/support stations. designed around the concept of interoperability, as a key factor in order to provide improved Teaching Besides, the M-346 ITS platform has been involved in Effectiveness capabilities compared to the other existing international Red Air missions achieving considerable trainer aircrafts, with the final aim to achieve the most success. cost effective training by downloading training tasks from 4th/5th generation combat aircraft. 2 M-346 ITS “Networked architecture design” starting from an advanced TNA Since the first design phases the Aermacchi M-346 has been considered not only as an aircraft but as a M-346 ITS was conceived around specific networked element of the Leonardo’s Integrated Requirements derived from a Training Need Analysis Training System (ITS); this also includes Ground Based (TNA) to fill the gap generated by new generation Training System (GBTS) and Mission Support Station combat aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale Al 30 Giugno 2016
    RELAZIONE FINANZIARIA SEMESTRALE AL 30 GIUGNO 2016 Relazione finanziaria semestrale al 30 giugno 2016 INDICE ORGANI SOCIALI E COMITATI ................................................................................................. 4 RELAZIONE SULL’ANDAMENTO DELLA GESTIONE AL 30 GIUGNO 2016 ................... 5 Risultati del Gruppo e situazione finanziaria .......................................................................................... 5 Outlook .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Operazioni industriali e finanziarie ....................................................................................................... 16 Operazioni con parti correlate ............................................................................................................... 18 Indicatori di performance “non-GAAP” ............................................................................................... 19 BILANCIO CONSOLIDATO SEMESTRALE ABBREVIATO AL 30 GIUGNO 2016.......... 22 Conto economico abbreviato separato consolidato ............................................................................... 23 Conto economico abbreviato complessivo consolidato......................................................................... 24 Situazione patrimoniale finanziaria abbreviata consolidata .................................................................. 25 Rendiconto finanziario abbreviato consolidato ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]