DOCSLIB.ORG

Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 2013 Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 2013 Early autumn 2010 photograph of Lower Lolo Creek. Photo credit: Matt Navarre Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ i Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1. Watershed Overview ................................................................................................ 6 Physical and Biological Characteristics ................................................................................... 6 Human History and Use of the Watershed .............................................................................. 7 Geographical, Cultural, and Social Aspects of Lolo Creek .....................................................10 Challenges, Threats, and Opportunities .................................................................................11 Chapter 2. Inventory of Available Information ............................................................................20 Tributaries within the Lolo Creek Watershed .........................................................................20 Climate ..................................................................................................................................21 Stream Flow ..........................................................................................................................21 Groundwater..........................................................................................................................25 Water Temperature ...............................................................................................................27 Floodplain ..............................................................................................................................27 Streambank Erosion/Stabilization ..........................................................................................28 Road Densities ......................................................................................................................30 Effects of Highway 12 Maintenance .......................................................................................31 Sewage Contamination .........................................................................................................32 Fish and Wildlife Concerns in Lolo Creek Watershed ............................................................33 Chapter 3. Impairment Causes and Sources .............................................................................36 Sedimentation .......................................................................................................................37 Fisheries, wildlife, and water quality/quantity issues in the Lolo Creek Watershed ................42 Additional Concerns Related to Human Activities ..................................................................46 Chapter 4. Needs in Lolo Creek ...............................................................................................49 Restoration opportunities and recommendations ...................................................................51 Throughout the watershed .....................................................................................................54 Summary of Suggested Management Measures ...................................................................56 Chapter 5. Technical and Financial Assistance Needs ..............................................................57 Chapter 6. Outreach and Education ..........................................................................................62 Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan: Education, Outreach & Fundraising Plan ...............62 Chapter 7. Implementation Schedule ........................................................................................66 Timeline and Implementation Schedule for Watershed Restoration Plan’s Items Coordinated by State and Federal Agencies ..............................................................................................66 Timeline and implementation schedule for the Lolo Watershed Group ..................................67 March 2013 i Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Chapter 8. Description of Measurable Interim Milestones .........................................................72 Examples of completed work upon which to build ..................................................................72 Framework for future work in Upper Lolo Creek ....................................................................73 Framework for future work in Lower Lolo Creek ....................................................................73 Chapter 9. Criteria to Show Water Quality/Quantity Goals are Being Met .................................82 Load reduction criteria for Upper Lolo Creek. ........................................................................82 Validating TMDL values and tracking progress ......................................................................83 Chapter 10. Technical Monitoring and Analysis Plan ................................................................95 Upper and Lower Lolo Creek TMDL Planning Areas .............................................................95 Additional Monitoring for Lower Lolo Creek public and private ownerships ............................95 Appendix A. Historic Area Map .................................................................................................97 Appendix B. Lolo Creek Physical Information Summary by Tributary ........................................98 Appendix C. Monthly climate summary data for the upper Lolo Creek Watershed .................. 102 Appendix D. USGS Gauging Station 12352000 ...................................................................... 103 Appendix E. Stream Flow and Temperature Data at Three Sites on Lolo Creek ..................... 106 Appendix F. Lolo Creek Floodplain Mapping ........................................................................... 109 Appendix G. Lolo Creek Tributary Electrofishing Database 1996-2010 ................................... 112 Appendix H. EPA Elements of the Lolo Watershed Restoration Plan. .................................... 119 EPA 1. Problems/Concerns ................................................................................................. 119 EPA 3. Measures needed to mediate problem ..................................................................... 119 EPA 4. Technical and Financial needs ................................................................................ 119 EPA 6. Timeline or Implementation Schedule ...................................................................... 119 EPA 7. Measurable Milestones ............................................................................................ 119 EPA 8. Criteria to show goals are being met........................................................................ 119 EPA 2. Estimate of expected load reductions. .................................................................... 129 EPA 9. The Monitoring Component. .................................................................................... 133 Appendix I. Lolo Creek Watershed Ownership Map ................................................................ 134 Appendix J. EPA’s Nine Elements of a Watershed-based Restoration Plan (WRP) ................ 135 References ............................................................................................................................. 137 March 2013 ii Lolo Creek Watershed Restoration Plan Acknowledgments The Lolo Watershed Group would like to thank Montana Department of Environmental Quality for providing funding to develop this watershed restoration plan for the Lolo Creek Watershed. In particular we would like to thank Laura Andersen for her editorial help and patience while we tried to put our thoughts to words within the framework of DEQ and EPA’s requirements. In addition we would like to thank the many agency and organization individuals who took the time to review our drafts and discuss details of restoration ideas for Lolo Creek. Included are: Traci Sylte, USFS who provided detailed comments and background on watersheds and beavers; Taylor Greenup, also USFS, who continued to give us encouragement and ideas; Paul Matter, USFS, for discussion and showing us stream-side examples; Shane Hendrickson, USFS, and Ladd Knotek, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, for help in describing fisheries issues; Todd Klietz, Missoula County Floodplain Administrator, for information on floodplain mapping, gaging stations and for sending the 1912 Missoula Quad map. Missoula Valley Water Quality District’s Peter Nielsen, Travis Ross, Jon Harvala and Michelle Hutchins for taking the time to meet with us to review and comment on our plan as it developed; Tara Comfort, Missoula Conservation District for helping us to understand the 310 law and the conservation district’s role in assisting land owners; Will McDowell, Clark Fork Coalition for helping us to try to simplify and put our thoughts into tables; Katie Gaut and Andy Fischer, also Clark Fork Coalition for monitoring sites on Lolo Creek and sharing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Through the Bitterroot Valley -1877
    Th^ Flight of the NezFexce ...through the Bitterroot Valley -1877 United States Forest Bitterroot Department of Service National Agriculture Forest 1877 Flight of the Nez Perce ...through the Bitterroot Valley July 24 - Two companies of the 7th Infantry with Captain Rawn, sup­ ported by over 150 citizen volunteers, construct log barricade across Lolo Creek (Fort Fizzle). Many Bitterroot Valley women and children were sent to Fort Owen, MT, or the two hastily constructed forts near Corvallis and Skalkaho (Grantsdale). July 28 - Nez Perce by-pass Fort Fizzle, camp on McClain Ranch north of Carlton Creek. July 29 - Nez Perce camp near Silverthorn Creek, west of Stevensville, MT. July 30 - Nez Perce trade in Stevensville. August 1 - Nez Perce at Corvallis, MT. August 3 - Colonel Gibbon and 7th Infantry reach Fort Missoula. August 4 - Nez Perce camp near junction of East and West Forks of the Bitterroot River. Gibbon camp north of Pine Hollow, southwest of Stevensville. August 5 - Nez Perce camp above Ross' Hole (near Indian Trees Camp­ ground). Gibbon at Sleeping Child Creek. Catlin and volunteers agree to join him. August 6 - Nez Perce camp on Trail Creek. Gibbon makes "dry camp" south of Rye Creek on way up the hills leading to Ross' Hole. General Howard at Lolo Hot Springs. August 7 - Nez Perce camp along Big Hole River. Gibbon at foot of Conti­ nental Divide. Lieutenant Bradley sent ahead with volunteers to scout. Howard 22 miles east of Lolo Hot Springs. August 8 - Nez Perce in camp at Big Hole. Gibbon crosses crest of Continen­ tal Divide parks wagons and deploys his command, just a few miles from the Nez Perce camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Summer 2015
    Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Summer 2015 Administrator’s Corner Greetings, Trail Fit? Are you up for the challenge? A trail hike or run can provide unique health results that cannot be achieved indoors on a treadmill while staring at a wall or television screen. Many people know instinctively that a walk on a trail in the woods will also clear the mind. There is a new generation that is already part of the fitness movement and eager for outdoor adventure of hiking, cycling, and horseback riding-yes horseback riding is exercise not only for the horse, but also the rider. We are encouraging people to get out on the Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Photo Service Forest U.S. (NPNHT) and Auto Tour Route to enjoy the many health Sandra Broncheau-McFarland benefits it has to offer. Remember to hydrate during these hot summer months. The NPNHT and Auto Tour Route is ripe for exploration! There are many captivating places and enthralling landscapes. Taking either journey - the whole route or sections, one will find unique and authentic places like nowhere else. Wherever one goes along the Trail or Auto Tour Route, they will encounter moments that will be forever etched in their memory. It is a journey of discovery. The Trail not only provides alternative routes to destinations throughout the trail corridor, they are destinations in themselves, each with a unique personality. This is one way that we can connect people to place across time. We hope you explore the trail system as it provides opportunities for bicycling, walking, hiking, running, skiing, horseback riding, kayaking, canoeing, and other activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak Ballot Issue
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Political community and nature| A look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak ballot issue Michael Maurice Welsh The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Welsh, Michael Maurice, "Political community and nature| A look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak ballot issue" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3246. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3246 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. UniversityMontana of The Political Community and Nature A Look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak Ballot Issue By Michael Maurice Welsh B.S. University of Iowa, 1984 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Montana 1990 Approved by / ( i (H ( ( / •<- ' "j ' c L (?L L i . , Chair, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School • ' I J / . / , L Date UMI Number: EP35345 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Hole National Battlefield Brochure and Map
    After the Battle of Big Hole When I walk the battlefi eld it’s sacred ground. A lot of relatives are buried there, but the memories of them are still living on. We are here today because of them. Their love for us lives in my heart. —?ıpelıkítemucet (Frank Andrews) Nez Perce camp at Big Hole Battlefi eld 1877 © CHUCK HANEY THE FLIGHT After the battle at Big Hole, the nımí.pu. ered fl owers and grass. Those leaves are enough already. General Miles had promised he got it by the destruction of our people. had to do with where they placed us. The fl ed. Each time the military caught up, they dead, those fl owers are dead. This tells of the that we might return to our own country. We who yesterday were rich are beggars interpreter asked us, ‘Where you want to go? escaped. “Every day was struggling,” said end of fi ghting. Soon we are to be attacked I thought we could start again. I believed today. We have no country, no people, no Lapwai and be Christian, or Colville and just kulkulsiyeké.t (Matthew Whitfi eld). “Fighting for the last time. Guns will be laid down.” General Miles, or I never would have surren- home.” He and over 250 others made it to be yourself?’ No other question was asked and hurrying on. Faint for food; tired with the dered. He could not have made any other Canada and safety. us. Chief [Young] Joseph was not given hard traveling. Little children, some of THE LAST BATTLE terms with me at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience the Nez Perce Trail
    Lolo, Montana, to the Big Hole National Battlefield, Montana, through the Bitterroot Valley Experience the Nez Perce Trail Bitterroot River © Jerry Bauer 1 The Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Designated by Congress in 1986, the entire Nez Perce National Historic Trail stretches 1,170 miles from the Wallowa Valley of eastern Oregon to the plains of north-central Montana. This segment of the Nez Perce National Historic Trail from Lolo, Montana, to the Big Hole Battlefield, Montana through the Bitterroot Valley is one of eight available tours (complete list on page 35). These are available at Forest Service offices and other federal and local visitor centers along the route. As you travel this historic trail, you will see highway signs marking the official Auto Tour route. Each Mainstream Auto Tour route stays on all-weather roads passable for all types of vehicles. Adventurous and Rugged Routes are an alternative for those seeking the most authentic historic route. They are often on gravel or dirt roads, so plan ahead. Check weather and road conditions before embarking on your journey. Call 511 for road condition reports on major routes. For road condition information on Adventurous and Rugged routes inquire locally. 3 Experience the Nez Perce Trail How do I get there? Mainstream Traveler (Passable for all types of vehicles.) This Auto Tour begins at Fort Fizzle, 4.6 miles west of Lolo Montana. Lolo is located approximately 7 miles south For most travelers this will be the appropriate route. of Missoula, Montana. The roads are generally paved and won’t pose a challenge for typical cars, campers with trailers, and RVs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-001 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Elfers. Jurden Henry. Barn and Field other names/site number IHSI #49-17934: SITS #10-IH-527 2. Location street & number John Day Creek N/A not for publication City or town Lucile X vicinity state Idaho code ID county Idaho code 049 zip code 83530 3. State/Federal Agency Certification_____ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _X_nationally _statewide _locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Lolo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2018 to 06/30/2018 Lolo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R1 - Northern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Bob Marshall Wilderness - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:04/2015 04/2015 Debbie Mucklow Outfitter and Guide Permit - Special use management Scoping Start 03/29/2014 406-758-6464 Reissuance [email protected] CE Description: Reissuance of existing outfitter and guide permits in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=44827 Location: UNIT - Swan Lake Ranger District, Hungry Horse Ranger District, Lincoln Ranger District, Rocky Mountain Ranger District, Seeley Lake Ranger District, Spotted Bear Ranger District. STATE - Montana. COUNTY - Flathead, Glacier, Lewis and Clark, Missoula, Pondera, Powell, Teton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. FNF Plan Revision & NCDE - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:05/2018 06/2018 Joseph Krueger GBCS Amendment to the Lolo, Objection Period Legal Notice 406-758-5243 Helena, Lewis & Clark,and 12/14/2017 [email protected] Kootenai NFs Description: The Flathead NF is revising their forest plan and preparing an amendment providing relevant direction from the EIS NCDE Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy into the forest plans for the Lolo, Helena, Kootenai, and Lewis & Clark *UPDATED* National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/flathead/fpr Location: UNIT - Kootenai National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Flathead National Forest All Units, Helena National Forest All Units, Lolo National Forest All Units.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolo Lake 2/7/2011
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior JOO National Park Service 010/ 8 Z 330 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 09Zc jiAiaoau This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets If needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Tolo Lake other names/site number NEPE Site # 29; Tepahlewam; Split Rocks; Tipahxlee’wuhm; Tolo Lake Camp 2. Location Street & number N/A not for publication XX city or town Granqeville vicinity state Idaho code county Idaho code 049 zip code 83530 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X_nomination___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets___does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: X national statewide local Die. 3.010 Signature of certifying/ing oflofncial/Tifle Date Suzi Pengilly, Deputy SHPO state or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property__ meets___ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tragic Destruction of the Nez Perce
    A 2019 BGES Americana Field University Program: The Tragic Destruction of the Nez Perce Of the many shameful episodes of Indian harassment and containment, none is more telling than the 1877 flight of the Nez Perce. Your trip chronologically follows the bands of the Nez Perce as they depart their naturally beautiful homelands in Idaho and are eventually cornered and defeated on the stark plains of northern Montana. While most of the Indian Wars are disjointed and take place over a long period of time, this campaign is continuous and cogent, with each day in chronological order. Easily understood and appreciated as we experience the homeland of the migrant tribe and the hundreds of miles they traverse to escape Federal oppression. Friday, August 16, 2019 5:00 PM: Check in at Ramada Inn at your leisure. If you have driven in, work out where you will be leaving your car. Let’s meet at 5 in the lobby to pick up your name tag and reading book and to receive introductory remarks from Len and Neil about the program that is to come. Hotel included. The food in the hotel restaurant is very good. Breakfast the next morning is included with your hotel room. Saturday, August 17, 2019 8:00 AM. Have your bags onboard for an 8 AM departure for Lewiston, Idaho. We’ll stop en route at the Steptoe Battlefield where, in 1858, 160 American soldiers engaged Indians from three tribes in a running fight until nightfall, when the Americans escaped. Following lunch on your own in Lewiston, you will go to the Nez Perce National Historic Park to learn about the Nez Perce and examine the mission site close by.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Did the Nez Perces Go in Yellowstone in 1877?
    Portland State University PDXScholar History Faculty Publications and Presentations History 1-1-1990 Where did the Nez Perces go in Yellowstone in 1877? William L. Lang Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/hist_fac Part of the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Lang, W. L. (1990). Where did the Nez Perces go in Yellowstone in 1877?. Montana: The Magazine Of Western History, 40(1), 14-29. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Where Did the Nez Perces by William L. Lang On October 5, 1877, at the end of one of the trulyheroic episodes in the Indian Wars in the Northwest, Chief Joseph of the Nez Percessurrendered to General Nelson A. Miles on a snow-dustedbattlefield along Snake Creek near present- day Havre, Montana. The Indians gave up just forty-some miles short of their destination-the international border with Canada,where they hoped to find a sanctuary.They had been pursued for nearly three months and over thirteen hundredmiles fromtheir reservationin central Idaho,testing the military'sskill and their own stamina. In his surrender message,Joseph describedhis people's condition as destitute and his warriorsas tired of the struggle."I will fight no more forever"-purportedly Joseph's words-became an anthem and was symbolic of the Nez Perces' struggleand failure to .
    [Show full text]
  • Some Effects of Rural Subdivisions on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Around Lolo Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1975 Some effects of rural subdivisions on wildlife and wildlife habitat around Lolo Montana Brace Hayden The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hayden, Brace, "Some effects of rural subdivisions on wildlife and wildlife habitat around Lolo Montana" (1975). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4802. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4802 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOME EFFECTS OF RURAL SUBDIVISIONS ON WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AROUND LOLO, MONTANA By Brace Hayden B.3., University of Montana, 1973 B.S., University of California at Davis, 1969 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1975 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners GrSfua^^chool /a , Date 7 UMI Number: EP40266 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Plan Adopts Non-Motorized Use for Their Portion of the Proposed Great Burn Wilderness
    Lolo KaNlispaell tional Forest Figure 3 Geographic Areas Kootenai NF Lower Clark Lewis Flathead & Fork Polson Thompson NF Clark Falls NF 200 Flathead Reservation Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes Superior North Fork Idaho Panhandle Seeley Lake Blackfoot NF Helena Middle Ninemile/Petty NF Clark Creek Seeley Fork Greater Missoula 200 Missoula Vicinity Map CANADA USA Lolo Creek Clearwater NF Rock Creek MONTANA Beaverhead - Deerlodge Bitterroot NF NF IDAHO 4/2006 Proposed Lolo National Forest Land Management Plan 2006 Geographic Area Desired Conditions Component Introduction While the forest-wide desired conditions indicate Plan Components broad trends which we expect to see over the next 10 to 15 years, we recognize that individual places Desired Conditions across the Lolo National Forest have unique Objectives Suitability of Areas characteristics and conditions. These places, referred Special Areas to as “geographic areas,” define a landscape that Guidelines people associate with on the Forest. Identifying these areas gives us the opportunity to fine-tune our forest- wide management to better respond to more local conditions and situations. The Lolo National Forest has been divided into the following eight geographic areas (see vicinity map on previous page): • Greater Missoula • Lolo Creek • Lower Clark Fork • Middle Clark Fork • Ninemile/Petty Creek • North Fork Blackfoot • Rock Creek • Seeley Lake Geographic Areas Each geographic area description provides the following: Geographic area map shows management areas (defined in Chapter 2) and acres in each, locations of unique features, primary population centers, and major rivers and roads. Unique characteristics and general overview provides a brief characterization of the area such as landscape features, primary land uses and ownership patterns, resource and recreational uses, and an indication of social and economic factors.
    [Show full text]