DOCSLIB.ORG

The “Land of the Free”? the United States in the Eyes of Italian American Radicals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The “Land of the Free”? the United States in the Eyes of Italian American Radicals View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs The “Land of the Free”? The United States in the Eyes of Italian American Radicals stefano luconi This short essay examines how Italian American radicals perceived American in- stitutions and political environment between the late nineteenth century and the mid nineteen-twenties. It argues that, after an early fascination with the United States, whose liberties seemed to offer a fitting context for the establish- ment of a socialist society, disillusionment eventually set in and even made some of the subversives receptive to nationalistic feelings. To many Italians, America had been a promised land since William Penn’s suc- cessors promoted Pennsylvania as the epitome of religious tolerance and self-gov- ernment to attract settlers from the Venetian Republic in the eighteenth century (Del Negro). The image of the United States as a free nation gained momentum following independence from Great Britain and, more especially, after the eman- cipation of the slaves in the wake of the Civil War because it had been precisely the legality of human bondage that had previously stood out as detrimental to the ide- ological appeal of the country (Gemme 31-32). As Gianfausto Rosoli has remarked, a long tradition rooted in the enlightenment and the Risorgimento in Italy made America seem “an absolute model of liberty” in the eyes of the Italians (223). The identification of the United States with freedom was so entrenched that it also lured a few Italian anarchists and socialists into making their way across the Atlantic and pursuing an American dream of their own at the turn of the twentieth century. In the decades of mass immigration from Italy, between the 97 early eighteen-eighties and the outbreak of World War I, most newcomers ar- rived for economic reasons. Nonetheless, the United States stood out as a land of opportunity not only for the unskilled laborers endeavoring to improve their standard of living in a thriving industrial society, but also for the political radi- cals who intended to propound the demise of capitalism and to establish a work- ers’ paradise on Earth. American Republicanism, as opposed to Italy’s monarchic institutions, seemed ideally suited to make the United States a more attractive setting than their native land (Testi). Karl Marx warned in the late eighteen-sixties that the United States had un- dergone such a fast centralization of capitalistic power after the Civil War that the era of the “Great Republic” as “the Promised Land for emigrant laborers” had seen its own demise (847). Yet, his words fell on deaf ears among many of his support- ers in Italy. Consequently, few agreed with Socialist leader Napoleone Colajanni, when he maintained that “the times of Washington and Franklin, of Madison, Jefferson, etc. have faded away” and that, therefore, the United States was far from being a workers’ potential paradise in the early twentieth century (323). On the contrary, the radical press in Italy continued to cherish the myth of the United States as a place where the class struggle was still viable and poten- tially effective. In this perspective, according to the Milan-based Socialist fort- nightly newspaper Critica Sociale, the land that represented the most advanced “stage of organized capitalism” was also the milieu in which a Socialist revolu- tion was most likely to succeed (Massimo 109). As a result, Giacinto Menotti Serrati, after moving to the United States in 1902 to become the editor of Il Pro- letario, the most authoritative mouthpiece of Italian American revolutionary socialism, contended that “in no other country than this should the Socialist Party thrive and reach great achievements” (qtd. in Rosada 149). It was not a matter of chance, therefore, that just two years later, the Socialist-turned-An- archist Carlo Tresca, when facing the alternative between exile in Switzerland or in the United States, chose the latter on the assumption that America was still “the land of the free” (The Autobiography 64). Again in 1904, after spending some time in Canada, another political émigré, Arturo Giovannitti, settled in the United States, because it seemed to him a more suitable environment for propounding his own ideals of humanitarian socialism among workers (Vecoli, “Arturo Giovannitti” 63). Referring to the attraction that the American insti- tutions had exerted on him, he argued that he had “learnt upon the knees of my father and mother to worship the name of a republic with tears in my eyes since I was a child” and, therefore, upon settling in the United States, he “really thought” that he had reached “a better and freer land than my country” (Giovan- nitti 331). Italian socialists, including leaders such as Filippo Turati, even envis- aged the establishment of rural colonies in North America as a viable means of diffusing their propaganda in a receptive milieu such as the countryside and, thereby, preventing militancy from being confined to industrial urban centers only (Dore 183-85). stefano luconi 98 Against this backdrop, Italian radicals also conceived the United States as ei- ther a temporary or a lasting haven from the repression of the post-unification governments of Italy. Indeed, the first significant exodus of anarchists and social- ists to America followed on the heels of Prime Minister Francesco Crispi’s 1894 quelling of the Sicilian fasci as well as the reactionary policies of his successor, Antonio Starabba di Rudinì, who dissolved the Chamber of Deputies in 1897 and declared a state of siege in most large cities the following year (Cartosio). Furthermore, in the eyes of some radicals the United States was, to all intents and purposes, an effective school of political extremism for Left-wingers. While Benito Mussolini was still a socialist activist, he distrusted Tresca’s credentials as a fully-fledged radical. But, upon learning that Tresca was moving to the United States, Mussolini expressed his conviction that “America, powerful America, will make you [Tresca] a true revolutionary comrade” (Tresca, The Autobiography 68). Ettore Ciccotti, a translator of Karl Marx’s works and a Socialist member of the Italian Parliament in the early twentieth century, even made a point of encourag- ing workers to move to the United States. In 1912 he published an article in Avan- ti!, the Milan-based Socialist daily organ, in which he contended that the Italian labor movement would benefit from the temporary resettlement of workers in the United States. Contrary to his comrades who held that expatriation to Amer- ica was tantamount to a denial of class consciousness, a rejection of militancy, and an apolitical stand in general, Ciccotti advocated emigration especially to the United States. He was confident that returning workers would import American ideas that would enrich the class struggle in Italy thanks to the strategies in fight- ing capitalism they had learned in the United States. In his opinion, as late as 1912, America was still a source of progressivism in the field of politics and labor (Degl’Innocenti 206). It was, in fact, in 1912, that the Socialist Party of America reached the apex of its electoral strength when its presidential candidate, Eugene V. Debs, gained six per- cent of the popular vote in the race for the White House (Kipnis 420). It is not sur- prising, therefore, that when the Socialist Party registered a decline in votes in the subsequent elections, the Italian radicals’ enthusiasm for the United States waned. Ciccotti was an emigrant himself. He had spent some time in Switzerland between 1898 and 1899 in the wake of di Rudinì’s crackdown on radicals, while he was on the run from the Italian police, but he never set foot on American soil (Manganaro Favaretto). His concept of the United States resulted from hearsay and did not tie in with the ensuing vision of his comrades who had firsthand knowledge of America. As a matter of fact, by the time Avanti! had published Cic- cotti’s article in 1912 few Italian anarchists and socialists who had settled in the United States shared his optimism about the political opportunities of the Amer- ican environment. The actual experience of life and work in the United States usually led to a feeling of disenchantment. Many radicals disembarked from Eu- rope to breathe American freedom, but they ended up being stifled by what they perceived as the American police state. They also witnessed the daily, grinding, the “land of the free”? 99 exploitation of workers within a capitalistic regime that was uncompromising in the claims made by wage earners. If Ciccotti urged Italian workers to leave for the United States in 1912, this was not the case of anarcho-syndicalist Edmondo Rossoni. In the same year, writing from San Francisco, he warned the readers of L’Internazionale—the organ of the Chamber of Labor in Parma¬that the United States was a “free country” merely in theory. As he put it, “Slavery was abolished on paper . ! Only for Blacks, how- ever, not for the wretched ‘company of the dead’ of white emigrants” (qtd. in Tin- ghino 45). Similarly, Il Proletario contended in 1920 that white industrial workers were the present-day American slaves (“Un appello”). Other radicals shared Rossoni’s feelings. In 1908, the Chicago-based and So- cialist-oriented weekly La Parola dei Socialisti reiterated that curbs on the access of radical newspapers to the postal service and a number of anti-union rulings by federal and state courts had turned the United States into a travesty of the land of freedom (“A proposito di libertà americana”; “Libertà americana”; “Le nostre libertà”). In the same year, anarchist Michele¬alias Ludovico¬Caminita pub- lished a pamphlet that he ironically entitled Free Country! The booklet stressed the “bitter disillusionment” awaiting those who disembarked in front of the Statue of Liberty and expected to enjoy the benefits of Republicanism and “equal- ity” among men as spelled out in the United States Declaration of Independence (qtd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revolutionary Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War: A
    Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Darlington, RR http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2012.731834 Title Re-evaluating syndicalist opposition to the First World War Authors Darlington, RR Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/19226/ Published Date 2012 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Re-evaluating Syndicalist Opposition to the First World War Abstract It has been argued that support for the First World War by the important French syndicalist organisation, the Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) has tended to obscure the fact that other national syndicalist organisations remained faithful to their professed workers’ internationalism: on this basis syndicalists beyond France, more than any other ideological persuasion within the organised trade union movement in immediate pre-war and wartime Europe, can be seen to have constituted an authentic movement of opposition to the war in their refusal to subordinate class interests to those of the state, to endorse policies of ‘defencism’ of the ‘national interest’ and to abandon the rhetoric of class conflict. This article, which attempts to contribute to a much neglected comparative historiography of the international syndicalist movement, re-evaluates the syndicalist response across a broad geographical field of canvas (embracing France, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Britain and America) to reveal a rather more nuanced, ambiguous and uneven picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Molisans Between Transoceanic Vocations and the Lure of the Continent
    / 4 / 2011 / Migrations Molisans between transoceanic vocations and the lure of the Continent by Norberto Lombardi 1. The opening up of hyper-rural Molise After the armies had passed through Molise, on the morrow of the end of World War II, Molisans’ main preoccupation was not leaving their land and looking for better job and life prospects abroad. There were more immediate concerns, such as the return of prisoners, the high cost of living, rebuilding bombed towns, restoring roads and railways, restoring the water and electricity supply, and finding raw materials for artisanal activities. The recovery of the area was thus seen in a rather narrow perspective, as the healing of the wounds inflicted by the war to local society and the productive infrastructure, or, at most, as a reinforcement and development of traditional activities. The only sector where this perspective broadened was that of interregional transportation. The hope was to overcome the isolation of the region, although as a long-term project. When one peruses the local pages of the more or less politically engaged newspapers and journals that appeared with the return of democracy, and when one looks at institutional activities, especially those of the Consiglio provinciale di Campobasso, one is even surprised by the paucity and belatedness of references to the theme of emigration, deeply rooted as it is in the social conditions and culture of the Molisans.1 For example, one has to wait until 1949 for a report from Agnone, one of the historical epicenters of Molisan migration, to appear in the newspaper Il Messaggero.2 The report 1 For an overview of the phenomenon of migration in the history of the region, see Ricciarda Simoncelli, Il Molise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini's Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità
    “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità Benjamin Barron Senior Honors Thesis in History HIST-409-02 Georgetown University Mentored by Professor Foss May 4, 2009 “A Mysterious Revival of Roman Passion”: Mussolini’s Ambiguous and Opportunistic Conception of Romanità CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgments ii List of Illustrations iii Introduction 1 I. Mussolini and the Power of Words 7 II. The Restrained Side of Mussolini’s Romanità 28 III. The Shift to Imperialism: The Second Italo-Ethiopian War 1935 – 1936 49 IV. Romanità in Mussolini’s New Roman Empire 58 Conclusion 90 Bibliography 95 i PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I first came up with the topic for this thesis when I visited Rome for the first time in March of 2008. I was studying abroad for the spring semester in Milan, and my six-month experience in Italy undoubtedly influenced the outcome of this thesis. In Milan, I grew to love everything about Italy – the language, the culture, the food, the people, and the history. During this time, I traveled throughout all of Italian peninsula and, without the support of my parents, this tremendous experience would not have been possible. For that, I thank them sincerely. This thesis would not have been possible without a few others whom I would like to thank. First and foremost, thank you, Professor Astarita, for all the time you put into our Honors Seminar class during the semester. I cannot imagine how hard it must have been to read all of our drafts so intently. Your effort has not gone unnoticed.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus for Mussolini? Popular Opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943)
    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM SCHOOL OF HISTORY AND CULTURES Department of History PhD in Modern History Consensus for Mussolini? Popular opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943) Supervisor: Prof. Sabine Lee Student: Marco Tiozzo Fasiolo ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017 2 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of Birmingham is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of my words. 3 Abstract The thesis focuses on the response of Venice province population to the rise of Fascism and to the regime’s attempts to fascistise Italian society.
    [Show full text]
  • La Guerra È Perduta Ma Mussolini Temporeggia, Mentre Il Re E Gli Industriali Si Defilano Nazionalsocialista
    30 commenti giovedì 25 luglio 2002 Enrico Manera tazione scomposta. Di lì in poi si susse- guivano le riunioni in cui si affacciava, più o meno chiaramente, l’ipotesi di pro- el tardo pomeriggio del 24 lu- porre a Mussolini di «mettersi da parte». glio 1943 si apre la lunga riunio- Mentre Roma subiva un pesante Nne del Gran Consiglio del fasci- bombardamento, Mussolini incontrava smo protrattasi fino a notte fonda, che Hitler a Feltre, il 19 luglio. L'intenzione decreta la caduta di Benito Mussolini. È del duce di convincere l’alleato tedesco a un crollo impietoso, l’atto definitivo di sciogliere il patto di alleanza per condur- un sistema di potere durato vent’anni le re l’Italia fuori dal conflitto, non veniva cui fondamenta, pregne del sangue degli nemmeno prospettata. Il Führer, deciso oppositori, della violenza delle guerre co- a mantenere fino all’ultimo la sua linea loniali, della vergo- politico-militare, gna delle leggi raz- si impegnava a in- ziali e del sostegno viare in Italia altre dei poteri forti, truppe: una minac- hanno incomincia- cia - appena velata to a sgretolarsi da - di occupazione. tempo, dall’inter- A questo pun- no. to, allo stallo del- Dalla fine del l’iniziativa di Mus- 1942 le condizioni solini si contrappo- della popolazione ne l’azione cospira- erano state messe toria dei gerarchi. a dura prova dalla Il 22 luglio Dino guerra e dai bom- Grandi, presidente bardamenti; svaria- della Camera dei ti segnali indicava- fasci e delle corpo- no che la rottura razioni, incontra di un legame di fi- Mussolini e gli pro- ducia con il regi- spetta i contenuti me si era ormai dell’ordine del completamente giorno che segnerà consumata.
    [Show full text]
  • Imigração, Sindicalismo Revolucionário E Fascismo Na Trajetória Do
    Imigração, sindicalismo revolucionário e fascismo na trajetória do militante italiano Edmondo Rossoni IMIGRAÇÃO, SINDICALISMO REVOLUCIONÁRIO E FASCISMO NA TRAJETÓRIA DO MILITANTE ITALIANO EDMONDO ROSSONI RESUMO Atraído pelo chamado de alguns companheiros exilados no Brasil em virtude da repressão que se seguiu a uma grande greve agrária ocorrida na Itália em 1908, o militante sindicalista revolucionário Edmondo Rossoni, que se tornaria, anos mais tarde, o grande organizador do sindicalismo fascista, deixava, em 1909, o exílio francês para um período de exílio brasileiro. Este artigo analisa alguns aspectos fundamentais de suas idéias e da sua intensa experiência política e sindical e também sua experiência brasileira, que se manifestou através de artigos, conferências, participação em organizações de trabalhadores e greves, além de uma experiência educativa mais formal como professor da Escola Moderna do bairro da Água Branca em São Paulo. Além disso, o artigo apresenta uma reflexão, a partir da trajetória de Rossoni, sobre as fortes ligações entre a experiência da imigração e o amadurecimento de convicções sindicalistas e nacionalistas que explicam, em parte, a trajetória de alguns militantes que, como ele, por caminhos tortuosos, foram parar nos braços do fascismo. Assim, torna-se central no artigo uma reflexão sobre o sindicalismo revolucionário e o fascismo e sobre as relações, reais ou fictícias, que foram estabelecidas entre eles. PALAVRAS-CHAVE Imigração. Sindicalismo Revolucionário. Fascismo. Corporativismo. Edilene Toledo1 IMIGRAÇÃO, SINDICALISMO REVOLUCIONÁRIO E FASCISMO NA TRAJETÓRIA DO MILITANTE ITALIANO EDMONDO ROSSONI Um dos fenômenos mais desconcertantes da história do movimento operário internacional foi a passagem de vários sindicalistas revolucionários ao governo fascista de Mussolini, e a sua participação ativa na idealização e na organização do sindicalismo fascista.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1 Revolutionary Apprenticeship
    Notes Introduction 1. Felice Guadagni and Renato Vidal, eds., Omaggio alla memoria imperitura di Carlo Tresca (New York: Il Martello, 1943), 43 (cited hereafter as Omaggio). 2. Ibid., 46. 3. David Montgomery, Workers’ Control in America: Studies in the History of Work, Technology, and Labor Struggles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 105. 4. Arturo Giovannitti’s foreword to Who Killed Carlo Tresca? (New York: Tresca Memorial Committee, 1945), 3. 5. Normad wrote an unpublished biography of Tresca bearing that title. Copies in the author’s collection and the Tresca Memorial Committee papers at the New York Public Library. 6. Guadagni and Vidal, Omaggio, 46. 1 Revolutionary Apprenticeship 1. See Italia Gualtieri, ed., Carlo Tresca: Vita e morte di un anarchico italiano in America (Chieti: Casa Editrice Tinari, 1994). 2. For details regarding Tresca’s parents, see The Autobiography of Carlo Tresca, edited by Nunzio Pernicone (New York: The John D. Calandra Italian American Institute, 2003), 1–7; Guadagni and Vidal, Omaggio, 6–7. Also, the author’s interview with Tresca’s daughter, Beatrice Tresca Rapport, Arlington, MA, November 12–14, 1973. After the ini- tial interview, Mrs. Rapport provided the author with additional information in several lengthy letters and more than a dozen long-distance telephone calls. For the sake of brevity, only the interview will be cited hereafter. 3. Tresca, Autobiography, 11–15; Interview with Beatrice Tresca Rapport; Cenno Biografico, in the Archivio Centrale dello Stato, Ministero dell’Interno, Direzione Generale di Pubblica Sicurezza, Casellario Politico Centrale: Tresca, Ettore. See also the commemorative issue of Il Martello (February 17, 1942) honoring Ettore after his death on January 15, 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • IWW Records, Part 3 1 Linear Foot (2 MB) 1930-1996, Bulk 1993-1996
    Part 1 Industrial Workers of the World Collection Papers, 1905-1972 92.3 linear feet Accession No. 130 L.C. Number MS 66-1519 The papers of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) were placed in the Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs in February of 1965, by the Industrial Workers of the World. Other deposits have been made subsequently. Over the turn of the century, the cause of labor and unionism had sustained some hard blows. High immigration, insecurity of employment and frequent economic recessions added to the problems of any believer in unionism. In January, 1905 a group of people from different areas of the country came to Chicago for a conference. Their interest was the cause of labor (viewed through a variety of political glasses) and their hope was somehow to get together, to start a successful drive for industrial unionism rather than craft unionism. A manifesto was formulated and a convention called for June, 1905 for discussion and action on industrial unionism and better working class solidarity. At that convention, the Industrial Workers of the World was organized. The more politically-minded members dropped out after a few years, as the IWW in general wished to take no political line at all, but instead to work through industrial union organization against the capitalist system. The main beliefs of this group are epitomized in the preamble to the IWW constitution, which emphasizes that the workers and their employers have "nothing in common." They were not anarchists, but rather believed in a minimal industrial government over an industrially organized society.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Communists, the Cold War, and West-East Migration from Venezia Giulia, 1945-1949
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Liberation by Emigration: Italian Communists, the Cold War, and West-East Migration from Venezia Giulia, 1945-1949 Luke Gramith West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Labor History Commons, Political History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Gramith, Luke, "Liberation by Emigration: Italian Communists, the Cold War, and West-East Migration from Venezia Giulia, 1945-1949" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3914. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3914 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBERATION BY EMIGRATION: ITALIAN COMMUNISTS, THE COLD WAR, AND WEST-EAST MIGRATION FROM VENEZIA GIULIA, 1945-1949 Luke Gramith Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Joshua Arthurs, Ph.D., Chair Katherine Aaslestad, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology (1901 - 1919)
    EMMA GOLDMAN: A GUIDE TO HER LIFE AND DOCUMENTARY SOURCES Candace Falk, Editor and Director Stephen Cole, Associate Editor Sally Thomas, Assistant Editor CHRONOLOGY (1901 - 1919) 1901 January-March Goldman supports herself by working as a nurse in New York City; helps to arrange a U.S. tour for Peter Kropotkin in March and April. Goldman reestablishes friendship with her former lover Edward Brady. April-July Goldman lecture tour begins with a free-speech battle in Philadelphia when she is prevented from speaking before the Shirt Makers Union. Goldman and the organizations that sponsor her talks, including the Single Tax Society, defy police orders; Goldman speaks in public on at least two occasions. On April 14 she speaks at an event sponsored by the Social Science Club; other speakers include Voltairine de Cleyre. Despite the Social Science Club's opposition to Goldman's anarchist views, it passes a resolution protesting the violation of her right to free speech. Speaks in Lynn, Mass., Boston, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, St. Louis, Chicago, and Spring Valley, Ill., on such topics as "Anarchism and Trade Unionism," "The Causes of Vice," and "Cooperation a Factor in the Industrial Struggle." July 15-August 15 Goldman spends a month with her sister Helena, in Rochester, N.Y., traveling briefly to Niagara Falls and to Buffalo, N.Y., to visit the Pan-American Exposition. Early September Goldman visits Alexander Berkman at the penitentiary in Allegheny, Pa., the first time she has seen him in nine years. 1 September 6 President William McKinley shot by self-proclaimed anarchist Leon Czolgosz in Buffalo, N.Y., at the Pan-American Exposition.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States in the Eyes of Italian American Radicals
    The “Land of the Free”? The United States in the Eyes of Italian American Radicals stefano luconi This short essay examines how Italian American radicals perceived American in- stitutions and political environment between the late nineteenth century and the mid nineteen-twenties. It argues that, after an early fascination with the United States, whose liberties seemed to offer a fitting context for the establish- ment of a socialist society, disillusionment eventually set in and even made some of the subversives receptive to nationalistic feelings. To many Italians, America had been a promised land since William Penn’s suc- cessors promoted Pennsylvania as the epitome of religious tolerance and self-gov- ernment to attract settlers from the Venetian Republic in the eighteenth century (Del Negro). The image of the United States as a free nation gained momentum following independence from Great Britain and, more especially, after the eman- cipation of the slaves in the wake of the Civil War because it had been precisely the legality of human bondage that had previously stood out as detrimental to the ide- ological appeal of the country (Gemme 31-32). As Gianfausto Rosoli has remarked, a long tradition rooted in the enlightenment and the Risorgimento in Italy made America seem “an absolute model of liberty” in the eyes of the Italians (223). The identification of the United States with freedom was so entrenched that it also lured a few Italian anarchists and socialists into making their way across the Atlantic and pursuing an American dream of their own at the turn of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussolini and Italy Additional Case Study for Authoritarian and Single-Party States Author and Series Editor: Allan Todd
    History for the IB Diploma Mussolini and Italy Additional case study for Authoritarian and Single-Party States Author and series editor: Allan Todd Cambridge University Press’s mission is to advance learning, knowledge and research worldwide. Our IB Diploma resources aim to: • encourage learners to explore concepts, ideas and topics that have local and global significance • help students develop a positive attitude to learning in preparation for higher education • assist students in approaching complex questions, applying critical-thinking skills and forming reasoned answers. Contents Mussolini and Italy: Introduction 2 Unit 1 Origins and rise, 1900–22 3 How did the historical context of Italy before 1919 contribute to Mussolini’s rise to power? 4 What were the key stages in Mussolini’s rise to power in the period 1919–22? 9 Why was Mussolini successful in his bid for power? 13 Unit 2 Ideology and the nature of the state 18 What role did ideology play in Mussolini’s rise to power? 18 To what extent was Mussolini a fascist? 23 What was the nature of Italy’s fascist state? 25 Unit 3 Establishment and consolidation of Mussolini’s rule 32 How did Mussolini establish his power in the period 1922–24? 32 What measures were taken after 1924 to further consolidate Mussolini’s power? 38 What other methods did Mussolini use to consolidate his power? 40 Unit 4 Domestic policies and their impact 48 What were the main features of Mussolini’s economic policies? 49 How successful were Mussolini’s economic policies? 51 What were the main social policies in Mussolini’s fascist Italy? 53 What were Mussolini’s policies towards women, ethnic and other minorities, and religion? 55 What impact did fascist rule have on education, young people and the arts? 59 Exam practice 63 Paper 1 exam practice 63 Paper 2 exam practice 68 Further information and acknowledgements 75 © Cambridge University Press 2011 Mussolini and Italy Introduction In October 1922, Benito Mussolini became prime minister of Italy.
    [Show full text]