DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Johannesburg Climate Change Adaptation Plan 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Johannesburg Climate Change Adaptation Plan 1 Climate Change Adaptation Plan City of Johannesburg Acknowledgements The following people contributed to the development of the Climate Change Adaptation Plan : Linda Phalatse and Mzukisi Gwata (City of Johannesburg) for their roles as Project Managers, Elan Theeboom (WSP Environment & Energy) for his Project Management role and preparations for this report, Dr Peter Johnston (UCT Climate Systems Analysis Group) for his key role within the project team and for his contribution to the risk assessment and adaptation planning process across all sectors but with particular focus on Community Development and Livelihood issues; Manfred Braune (WSP Green by Design) likewise for his key role and contribution to the risk assessment and adaptation planning process across all sectors but with particular focus on Infrastructural and Urban Planning issues; and Prof. Bruce Hewitson and Lisa Coop (UCT Climate Systems Analysis Group) for their work on the downscaling of climate model projections for the CoJ region. This assessment has relied on the input of a large number of technical experts across a wide range of environmental and engineering sectors. The authors would like to specifically acknowledge Kobus de Villiers (WSP Consulting Engineers) for his energy-demand modelling for air-conditioning and refrigeration, and Kevin van Blerk (WSP Civil & Structural) for his input on stormwater modelling. The authors would also like to thank the members of the CoJ Johannesburg Climate Change Coordination Committee (JCCCC) and all other CoJ staff members and consultants who took part in the various workshops for their invaluable input and feedback. Contact It is likely that this document is updated and improved over time. Should you have any suggestions please email suggestions to Linda Phalatse at [email protected] Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the City of Joburg. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this guide are factually correct, the City of Joburg does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may result, directly, or indirectly, through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. © City of Joburg, 2009 This work is copyright and no part may be reproduced without written permission. Permission for reproduction should be directed to the City of Joburg. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Policy Framework 1 1.3 Mitigation versus Adaptation 2 1.4 Comparative Vulnerability of the CoJ 3 2. METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 Risk Assessment Methodology 4 2.2 Climate Modelling Methodology 5 3. CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE COJ 6 3.1 Geography of the CoJ 6 3.2 Current Climate 7 3.3 Temperature 8 3.3.1 Current Trends in Temperature 8 3.3.2 Future Trends in Temperature 9 3.3.3 Extreme Temperature 10 3.4 Precipitation 15 3.4.1 Current Trends in Precipitation 15 3.4.2 Future Trends in Precipitation 16 3.4.3 Extreme Precipitation 18 3.5 Other Climatic Variables 22 3.5.1 Evapotranspiration 22 3.5.2 Humidity 22 3.5.3 High Pressure Cell 22 3.5.4 Wind, Hail, Lightning and other Weather-related Events 22 4. VULNERABILITIES OF COJ KEY SECTORS 24 4.1 Introduction 24 4.2 Environment 24 4.2.1 Introduction 24 4.2.2 Air Quality 24 4.2.3 Natural Water Resources 25 4.2.4 Biodiversity 26 4.3 Health 27 4.4 Infrastructure 27 4.4.1 Stormwater 27 4.4.2 Water Supply & Sanitation 29 4.4.3 Transport 30 4.4.4 Energy, Electrical and Telecommunications 30 4.4.5 Built and Urban Environment 32 4.5 Disaster Management 33 4.6 Finance & Economy 33 4.7 Community Development & Livelihood 34 4.7.1 Climate Change and Urban Poverty 34 4.7.2 Employment 35 4.7.3 Housing and Living Environment 35 4.7.4 Food Security 36 4.7.5 Water Security 37 4.7.6 Migration 38 5. RISK ASSESSMENT 40 5.1 Introduction 40 5.2 Risk Assessment Framework 40 5.2.1 Risk Identification 40 5.2.2 Risk Prioritising 40 5.3 Risks due to Changes in Temperature 42 5.4 Risks Due to Changes in Precipitation 45 5.5 Risks Arising from Climate Change Impacts outside the CoJ Boundaries 48 5.6 Risks Due to Changes in Other Synoptic & Climatic Variables 50 5.7 Summary 52 6. KEY FINDINGS - HIGH PRIORITY RISKS 53 6.1 Introduction 53 6.2 Risk T1: Increase in Heat-Related Death 53 6.3 Risk T2: Increase in Energy Demand 56 6.4 Risk TP4: Biodiversity Impacts on Disease Vectors - Health Risks 58 6.5 Risks P1 - P4: Increased Risk of Urban Flooding 60 6.6 Risks X1 & T3: Disruption to Water Security 65 6.7 Risk X2: Climate Change-driven Refugees and Migrants 68 7. ADAPTATION ACTIONS FOR CoJ 69 7.1 Introduction 69 7.2 The Cost of Adaptations 70 7.2.1 Introduction 70 7.2.2 Methodology 71 7.2.3 Future Assessment of Costs and Benefits 71 7.3 Adaptations for High Priority Risks 72 7.3.1 Risk T1: Increase in Heat-Related Death 72 7.3.2 Risk T2: Increase in Energy Demand 73 7.3.3 Risk TP4: Biodiversity Impacts on Disease Vectors - Health Risks 74 7.3.4 Risks P1 - P4: Increased Risk of Urban Flooding 75 7.3.5 Risks X1 & T3: Disruption to Water Security 78 7.3.6 Risk X2: Climate Change-driven Refugees and Migrants 80 7.4 Strategic Adaptations 81 7.5 Summary of Key Adaptations 84 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Decision-Making Framework (UKCIP, 2003)……………………………………………………………………4 Figure 3: Map showing the administrative regions of the City of Johannesburg ........................................................... 7 Figure 4: Time series of downscaled mean annual daily maximum surface temperature (°C) ......................................11 Figure 5: Mean seasonal cycle of downscaled daily maximum temperature (°C) ........................................................12 Figure 6: Time series of downscaled mean annual daily minimum surface temperature (°C) ........................................13 Figure 7: Mean seasonal cycle of downscaled maximum temperature (°C) .................................................................14 Figure 8: Time series of downscaled mean annual daily precipitation (mm) .............................................................. 20 Figure 9: Mean seasonal cycle of downscaled monthly total precipitation (mm) ..........................................................21 Figure 10: Surface specific humidity simulated by the Meteo-France/CNRM GCM .....................................................23 Figure 11: Weather Fatalities in the U.S ...............................................................................................................54 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Climate Data for the CoJ for the period 1961 - 1990 ..................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Trends in Temperatures 1961-2006 (Krugersdorp weather station) .............................................................. 9 Table 3: Increase in Average Maximum Day-Time Temperature1 ...............................................................................................................................................................9 Table 4: Increase in Average Minimum Night-Time Temperature1 ...........................................................................................................................................................10 Table 5: Frequency of Temperature Thresholds Exceeded (days/month) ...................................................................15 Table 6: Trends in Precipitation 1961-2006. (Krugersdorp weather station) .............................................................. 15 Table 7: Change in Precipitation Projections (mm/month) for the CoJ .........................................................................17 Table 8: Possible Mean Seasonal Increases (%) in Rainfall for the CoJ ......................................................................17 Table 9: Mean Precipitation: historic and potential future rainfall figures ....................................................................17 Table 10: No. of Rain-days in the CoJ: Control Period vs. Future Periods ................................................................ 18 Table 11: No. of Rain-days in the CoJ: Control Period vs. Future Periods ................................................................ 19 Table 12: Relative contribution of different sectors to the CoJ economy for 2000 & 2007 .............................................33 Table 13: Risks due to predicted changes in temperatures within the CoJ region .......................................................42 Table 14: Risks due to predicted changes in precipitation within the CoJ region .........................................................45 Table 15: Risks due to climate change impacts outside of the CoJ region ................................................................ 48 Table 16: Risks due to predicted changes in other synoptic/climatic variables ........................................................... 50 Table 17: Strategic Adaptations for the CoJ and Preliminary Cost/Value Rankings1 .........................................................................................................86 Table 18: Key Adaptations for the CoJ and Draft Preliminary Cost/Value Rankings1 .......................................................................................................88 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Glossary Appendix B: SRES Scenarios EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is broad international consensus that some Risk X2: Climate-Change-driven Refugees and degree
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Johannesburg Ward Councillors: Region F
    CITY OF JOHANNESBURG WARD COUNCILLORS: REGION F No. Councillors Party Region Ward Ward Suburbs: Ward Administrator: Name/Surname & Contact : : No: Details: 1. Cllr. Sarah Wissler DA F 23 Glenvista, Glenanda, Nombongo Sitela 011 681- [email protected] Mulbarton, Bassonia, Kibler 8094 011 682 2184 Park, Eikenhof, Rispark, [email protected] 083 256 3453 Mayfield Park, Aspen Hills, Patlyn, Rietvlei 2. VACANT DA F 54 Mondeor, Suideroord, Alan Lijeng Mbuli Manor, Meredale, Winchester 011 681-8092 Hills, Crown Gardens, [email protected] Ridgeway, Ormonde, Evans Park, Booysens Reserve, Winchester Hills Ext 1 3. Cllr Rashieda Landis DA F 55 Turffontein, Bellavista, Lijeng Mbuli [email protected] Haddon, Lindberg Park, 011 681-8092 083 752 6468 Kenilworth, Towerby, Gillview, [email protected] Forest Hill, Chrisville, Robertsham, Xavier and Golf 4. Cllr. Michael Crichton DA F 56 Rosettenville, Townsview, The Lijeng Mbuli [email protected] Hill, The Hill Extension, 011 681-8092 083 383 6366 Oakdene, Eastcliffe, [email protected] Linmeyer, La Rochelle (from 6th Street South) 5. Cllr. Faeeza Chame DA F 57 Moffat View, South Hills, La Nombongo Sitela [email protected] Rochelle, Regents Park& Ext 011 681-8094 081 329 7424 13, Roseacre1,2,3,4, Unigray, [email protected] Elladoon, Elandspark, Elansrol, Tulisa Park, Linmeyer, Risana, City Deep, Prolecon, Heriotdale, Rosherville 6. Cllr. A Christians DA F 58 Vredepark, Fordsburg, Sharon Louw [email protected] Laanglagte, Amalgam, 011 376-8618 011 407 7253 Mayfair, Paginer [email protected] 081 402 5977 7. Cllr. Francinah Mashao ANC F 59 Joubert Park Diane Geluk [email protected] 011 376-8615 011 376-8611 [email protected] 082 308 5830 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5. Identified Sites of Significance Residential Buildings Within Rosettenville (Semi-Detached, Freestanding)
    7.5. Identified sites of significance_Residential buildings within Rosettenville (Semi-detached, freestanding) Introduction Residential buildings are buildings that are generally used for residential purposes or have been zoned for residential usage. It must be noted the majority of residences are over 60 years, it was therefore imperative for detailed visual study to be done where the most significant buildings were mapped out. Their significance could be as a result of them being associated to prominent figures, association with special events, design patterns of a certain period in history, rarity or part of an important architectural school. Most of the sites identified in this category are of importance in their local contexts and are representative of the historical and cultural patterns that could be discerned from the built environment. All the identified sites were given a 3A category explained below. Grading 3A_Sites that have a highly significant association with a historic person, social grouping, historic events, public memories, historical activities, and historical landmarks (should by all means be conserved) 3B_ Buildings of marginally lesser significance (possibility of senstive alteration and addition to the interior) 3C_Buildings and or sites whose significance is in large part significance that contributes to the character of significance of the environs (possibility for alteration and addition to the exterior) Summary Table of identified sites in the residential category: Site/ Description Provisional Heritage Implications
    [Show full text]
  • Gauteng Provincial Gazette Vol 19 No 110 Dated 24 April 2013
    T E U N A G THE PROVINCE OF G DIE PROVINSIE UNITY DIVERSITY GAUTENG P IN GAUTENG R T O N V E IN M C RN IAL GOVE Provincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 19 PRETORIA, 24 APRIL 2013 No. 110 We oil hawm he power to preftvent kllDc AIDS HEIRINE 0800 012 322 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 301707—A 110—1 2 No. 110 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 24 APRIL 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the sender’s respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE 1021 Gauteng Gambling Act, 1995: Application for a gaming machine licence..................................................................... 3 110 BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 24 APRIL 2013 No. 110 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE 1021 OF 2013 Gauteng Gambling and Betting Act 1995 Application for a Gaming Machine Licence Notice is hereby given that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Amsterdam-Olivedale-E-Brochure.Pdf
    JOHANNESBURG NORTH GATEHOUSE FOURWAYS 7km SUNNINGHILL 12km Coca-Cola Dome RIVONIA 11km Northgate Shopping Centre BRYANSTON 8km MORNINGSIDE 12km SCHOOLS SHOPPING HOSPITALS The Kings College - 1km Olivedale Corner - 1.0km Olivedale Hospital - 1.0km Sharonlea Primary - 1.9km All Saints - 0.9km Life Fourways Hospital - 5.5km SANDTON Little Steps Pre-school - 0.4km Northriding Square - 1.5km Morningside Medi-clinic - 8.3km 11km Summerfield Nursery School -0.6km Phoenix Centre - 1.9km Life Flore Clinic - 11.9km Toddies Play Group - 0.7km Bel Air Shopping Centre - 2.5km Netcare Waterfall City Hospital - 13.1km Clever Kids Nursery School - 0.8km Douglasdale Shopping Centre - 2.5km BLAIRGOWRIE Swimming School - 0.8km Northgate Shopping Centre - 2.0km 9km Northriding Secondary School - 1.9km Oxford Preschool - 2.5km O’Summit Montessori - 2.0km CRESTA 12km DEVELOPMENT LIFESTYLE CENTRE LIFESTYLE CENTRE SHOW APARTMENTS SHOW APARTMENTS APARTMENT LAYOUTS A A1 B C D 3 Bedroom 2 Bathroom 3 Bedroom 2 Bathroom 2 Bedroom 2 Bathroom 1 Bedroom 1 Bathroom 1 Bedroom 1 Bathroom Ground Floor First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Third Floor Apartment Area 86.8m2 Apartment Area 94.4m2 Apartment Area 94.4m2 Apartment Area 40.5m2 Apartment Area 46.0m2 Covered Balcony 12.9m2 Covered Patio 12.7m2 Covered Balcony 10.4m2 Open Balcony 7.0m2 Open Balcony 7.0m2 Open Balcony 6.7m2 TOTAL AREA 107.1m2 TOTAL AREA 104.8m2 TOTAL AREA 47.5m2 TOTAL AREA 53.0m2 TOTAL AREA 106.4m2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIFICATIONS & FINISHES S4 Sandton - Randburg You must have a valid Gautrain Card to board a Bus.
    [Show full text]
  • BUILDING from SCRATCH: New Cities, Privatized Urbanism and the Spatial Restructuring of Johannesburg After Apartheid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH 471 DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12180 — BUILDING FROM SCRATCH: New Cities, Privatized Urbanism and the Spatial Restructuring of Johannesburg after Apartheid claire w. herbert and martin j. murray Abstract By the start of the twenty-first century, the once dominant historical downtown core of Johannesburg had lost its privileged status as the center of business and commercial activities, the metropolitan landscape having been restructured into an assemblage of sprawling, rival edge cities. Real estate developers have recently unveiled ambitious plans to build two completely new cities from scratch: Waterfall City and Lanseria Airport City ( formerly called Cradle City) are master-planned, holistically designed ‘satellite cities’ built on vacant land. While incorporating features found in earlier city-building efforts, these two new self-contained, privately-managed cities operate outside the administrative reach of public authority and thus exemplify the global trend toward privatized urbanism. Waterfall City, located on land that has been owned by the same extended family for nearly 100 years, is spearheaded by a single corporate entity. Lanseria Airport City/Cradle City is a planned ‘aerotropolis’ surrounding the existing Lanseria airport at the northwest corner of the Johannesburg metropole. These two new private cities differ from earlier large-scale urban projects because everything from basic infrastructure (including utilities, sewerage, and the installation and maintenance of roadways),
    [Show full text]
  • The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, the Early Days. Compiled by René
    The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, The Early Days. Compiled by René de Villiers. Proclamation of The Reserve The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, or the reserve for short, has always had a special place in the hearts and minds of the people living along its borders and is safe to say that most of the residents in Mondeor feel that way about it. It was certainly the case in the early days of the reserve, and I count myself among them. Since the very early days the Klipriviersberg Nature Reserve Association (KNRA) had been arranging guided walks in the reserve, and with the modest finances at its disposal strove to keep alien vegetation in check, combat fires, arrange guided walks and bring the reserve to the attention of the greater Johannesburg and the rest of the country. One of its earliest projects was to lobby, successfully, for the formal proclamation of the area as a nature reserve. For the record, it was proclaimed on 9th October 1984 in terms of section 14 of the Nature Conservation Ordinance (Ordinance 12 of 1983); Administrator’s Notice 1827. It comprises Erf 49 Alan Manor, Erf 1472 Mondeor, Erf 1353 Kibler Park and Ptn 14 of the Farm Rietvlei 101. All of these erven belong to the (then) Johannesburg City Council Parks and Recreation Department. Portion 17 of the farm Rietvlei 101 which falls within the fenced borders of the reserve, belongs to the University of the Witwatersrand. In all its endeavours the KNRA has done a sterling job and we owe a large debt of gratitude to those early pioneering committees and members in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Johannesburg Spatial Development Framework 2040
    City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality Spatial Development Framework 2040 In collaboration with: Iyer Urban Design, UN Habitat, Urban Morphology and Complex Systems Institute and the French Development Agency City of Johannesburg: Department of Development Planning 2016 Table of Contents Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Existing Spatial Structure of Johannesburg and its Shortcomings ........................................ 11 2.2. Transformation Agenda: Towards a Spatially Just City ......................................................... 12 2.3. Spatial Vision: A Compact Polycentric City ........................................................................... 12 2.4. Spatial Framework and Implementation Strategy ................................................................ 17 2.4.1. An integrated natural structure .................................................................................... 17 2.4.2. Transformation Zone ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State, South Africa
    Higher Education in Regional and City Development Higher Education in Regional and City Higher Education in Regional and City Development Development THE FREE STATE, SOUTH AFRICA The third largest of South Africa’s nine provinces, the Free State suffers from The Free State, unemployment, poverty and low skills. Only one-third of its working age adults are employed. 150 000 unemployed youth are outside of training and education. South Africa Centrally located and landlocked, the Free State lacks obvious regional assets and features a declining economy. Jaana Puukka, Patrick Dubarle, Holly McKiernan, How can the Free State develop a more inclusive labour market and education Jairam Reddy and Philip Wade. system? How can it address the long-term challenges of poverty, inequity and poor health? How can it turn the potential of its universities and FET-colleges into an active asset for regional development? This publication explores a range of helpful policy measures and institutional reforms to mobilise higher education for regional development. It is part of the series of the OECD reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development. These reviews help mobilise higher education institutions for economic, social and cultural development of cities and regions. They analyse how the higher education system T impacts upon regional and local development and bring together universities, other he Free State, South Africa higher education institutions and public and private agencies to identify strategic goals and to work towards them. CONTENTS Chapter 1. The Free State in context Chapter 2. Human capital and skills development in the Free State Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rietvallei Road, Zandspruit, Randburg Unlock the Potential of Space
    Rietvallei Road, Zandspruit, Randburg Unlock the potential of space A space is more than its surface area and walls; it’s a canvas for human experience. More than structure and aesthetics, spaces enable connections and inspire. Spaces engage us; they are sensory and invite interaction. They draw us in and influence our wellbeing. Spaces hold history. They can be imagined and reimagined. At Investec Property, we don’t just look at how a space is, but at how it can be and what it can bring to people’s lives. We see the value it holds and the opportunities it presents. We see the potential of space. Location We get the fundamentals right. Everything we’ve achieved is built on the understanding that location is strategic. Once we have the right Relation location and understand We engage with our the context of the space, stakeholders and tenants we begin to imagine how to understand their we can repurpose it to requirements now, and its full potential. Then, we anticipate how these we create a sought-after might change in future. environment that both From this knowledge, we complements and adds evolve spaces so that Innovation to its surrounds. It’s they work optimally for We innovate to realise how we develop quality our occupiers. We also the potential of space assets that hold value prioritise the preservation and collaborate with new and deliver attractive of sound covenants to partners, shifting the long-term returns. ensure low vacancies. emphasis from assets to By valuing and investing experiences that meet our in human connections, clients’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Province of Kwazulu-Natal
    PROVINCE OF KWAZULU-NATAL Socio-Economic Review and Outlook 2019/2020 KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government ISBN: ISBN No. 1-920041-43-5 To obtain further copies of this document, please contact: Provincial Treasury 5th Floor Treasury House 145 Chief Albert Luthuli Road 3201 P.O. Box 3613 Pietermaritzburg 3200 Tel: +27 (0) 33 – 897 4444 Fax: +27 (0) 33 – 897 4580 Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Demographic Profile ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………... 3 2.2 Global population growth ............................................................................................. 4 2.3 South African population ............................................................................................. 7 2.4 Population growth rate……………………………………………………………… .......... 8 2.4.1 Population distribution by age and gender ............................................................... 8 2.4.2 Population by race…………………………………………………………………… ...... 9 2.5 Fertility, mortality, life expectancy and migration……………………………… .............. 10 2.5.1 Fertility…………………………………………………………………………….. ............ 11 2.5.2 Mortality………………………………………………………………………………… ..... 13 2.5.3 Life expectancy……………………………………………………………………… ........ 16 2.5.4 Migration…………………………………………………………………………… ........... 17 2.6 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Pikitup Waste Facilities-Private Recyclers
    Sector Class Waste_Focus Management Existing/Proposed Company Name/ Site Name City Longitude Latitude Physical Address Materials Recycled Equipment Depot Region CIP/Pikitup_ref Pikitup Landfill assigned Column3 Priority Co-Operatives Recycling Pikitup Existing ABNP/BFGA Coop Johannesburg 28,038314 -26,231728 Robinson Deep Landfill. Turffontein Road, Turfontein SOUTHDALE F Robinson Deep / Goudkoppies Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Allie Street Garden Site Johannesburg 27,885747 -26,299961 Allie Street Eldorado Park Ext 9 No Recycling, Green Waste, Occasional Waste AVALON G Goudkoppies/Ennerdale Recycling Company Recycling Private Existing Amalgamated Metals Recycling Johannesburg 27,865584 -26,153144 2849 Albertina Sisulu Road,Cnr Nywerheid Manufacta RoodepoortMetals ROODEPOORTC Marie Louise Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Ashanti Garden Site Johannesburg 27,979519 -26,195217 Ashanti Street (RE 560) Coronationville Plastic only. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow, Green Waste, OccasionalWATERVAL WasteB Robinson Deep Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Ashburton Garden Site Johannesburg 27,982678 -26,212214 Ashburton Street, Riverlea Cardboard. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow, Green Waste, OccasionalWATERVAL WasteB Robinson Deep Depot Logistics Pikitup Existing Avalon Depot Johannesburg 27,877553 -26,289331 Calandula Street, Klipspruit West AVALON D Goudkoppies/Ennerdale Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Babiana Garden Site Johannesburg 27,960594 -26,203431 Babiana Street, Riverlea Cardboard. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow,
    [Show full text]
  • A Gis Approach for Flood Vulnerability and Adaptation Analysis in Diepsloot, Johannesburg
    A GIS APPROACH FOR FLOOD VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION ANALYSIS IN DIEPSLOOT, JOHANNESBURG ADELINE NGIE (Student No. 201003585) Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies Supervisors: Prof. H.J. Annegarn Maryna Storie Gauteng City-Region Observatory, (A collaboration between the University of Johannesburg, the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg and the Gauteng Provincial Government) A minor dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Management. 30 January 2012 Affidavit TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This serves to confirm that I, Adeline NGIE with student number 201003585 and bearer of Cameroonian Passport Number 01138195, enrolled for an MSc in Environmental Management with the Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies in the Faculty of Science, herewith declare that my academic work titled: A GIS approach for flood vulnerability and adaptation analysis in Diepsloot, Johannesburg, is in line with the Plagiarism Policy of the University of Johannesburg, with which I am familiar. I further declare that this work is authentic and original unless clearly indicated otherwise and in such instances full reference to the source is acknowledged and I do not pretend to receive any credit for such acknowledged quotations, and that there is no copyright infringement in my work. I declare that no unethical research practices were used or material gained through dishonesty. I understand that plagiarism is a serious offence and that should I contravene the Plagiarism Policy notwithstanding signing this affidavit, I may be found guilty of a serious criminal offence (perjury) that would amongst other consequences compel the University to inform all other tertiary institutions of the offence and to issue a corresponding certificate of reprehensible academic conduct to whoever request such a certificate from the institution.
    [Show full text]