DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Math/0605667V5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Math/0605667V5 NOTES ON PERELMAN’S PAPERS BRUCE KLEINER AND JOHN LOTT 1. Introduction These are notes on Perelman’s papers “The Entropy Formula for the Ricci Flow and its Geometric Applications” [51] and “Ricci Flow with Surgery on Three-Manifolds’ [52]. In these two remarkable preprints, which were posted on the ArXiv in 2002 and 2003, Grisha Perelman announced a proof of the Poincar´eConjecture, and more generally Thurston’s Geometrization Conjecture, using the Ricci flow approach of Hamilton. Perelman’s proofs are concise and, at times, sketchy. The purpose of these notes is to provide the details that are missing in [51] and [52], which contain Perelman’s arguments for the Geometrization Conjecture. Among other things, we cover the construction of the Ricci flow with surgery of [52]. We also discuss the long-time behavior of the Ricci flow with surgery, which is needed for the full Geometrization Conjecture. The papers [24, 53], which are not covered in these notes, each provide a shortcut in the case of the Poincar´eConjecture. Namely, these papers show that if the initial manifold is simply-connected then the Ricci flow with surgery becomes extinct in a finite time, thereby removing the issue of the long-time behavior. Combining this claim with the proof of existence of Ricci flow with surgery gives the shortened proof in the simply-connected case. These notes are intended for readers with a solid background in geometric analysis. Good sources for background material on Ricci flow are [22, 23, 33, 66]. The notes are self- contained but are designed to be read along with [51, 52]. For the most part we follow the format of [51, 52] and use the section numbers of [51, 52] to label our sections. We have done this in order to respect the structure of [51, 52] and to facilitate the use of the present arXiv:math/0605667v5 [math.DG] 19 Feb 2013 notes as a companion to [51, 52]. In some places we have rearranged Perelman’s arguments or provided alternative arguments, but we have refrained from an overall reorganization. Besides providing details for Perelman’s proofs, we have included some expository material in the form of overviews and appendices. Section 3 contains an overview of the Ricci flow approach to geometrization of 3-manifolds. Sections 4 and 57 contain overviews of [51] and [52], respectively. The appendices discuss some background material and techniques that are used throughout the notes. Regarding the proofs, the papers [51, 52] contain some incorrect statements and incom- plete arguments, which we have attempted to point out to the reader. (Some of the mistakes in [51] were corrected in [52].) We did not find any serious problems, meaning problems that cannot be corrected using the methods introduced by Perelman. Date: February 13, 2013. Research supported by NSF grants DMS-0306242 and DMS-0204506, and the Clay Mathematics Institute. 1 2 BRUCE KLEINER AND JOHN LOTT We will refer to Section X.Y of [51] as I.X.Y, and Section X.Y of [52] as II.X.Y. A reader may wish to start with the overviews, which explain the logical structure of the arguments and the interrelations between the sections. It may also be helpful to browse through the appendices before delving into the main body of the material. These notes have gone through various versions, which were posted at [39]. An initial version with notes on [51] was posted in June 2003. A version covering [51, 52] was posted in September 2004. After the May 2006 version of these notes was posted on the ArXiv, expositions of Perelman’s work appeared in [15] and [45]. Acknowledgements. In the preparation of the September 2004 version of our notes, we benefited from a workshop on Perelman’s surgery procedure that was held in August 2004, at Princeton. We thank the participants of that meeting, as well as the Clay Mathematics Institute for supporting it. We are grateful for comments and corrections that we have received regarding earlier versions of these notes. We especially thank G´erard Besson for comments on Theorem 13.3 and Lemma 80.4, Peng Lu for comments on Lemma 74.1, Bernhard Leeb for discussions on the issue of uniqueness for the standard solution and Richard Bamler for comments on Proposition 84.1 and Proposition 84.2. Along with these people we thank Mike Anderson, Albert Chau, Ben Chow, Xianzhe Dai, Jonathan Dinkelbach, Sylvain Maillot, John Morgan, Joan Porti, Gang Tian, Peter Topping, Bing Wang, Guofang Wei, Hartmut Weiss, Burkhard Wilking, Jon Wolfson, Rugang Ye and Maciej Zworski. We thank the referees for their detailed and helpful comments on this paper. We thank the Clay Mathematics Institute for supporting the writing of the notes on [52]. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. A reading guide 6 3. An overview of the Ricci flow approach to 3-manifold geometrization 7 3.1. The definition of Ricci flow, and some basic properties 7 3.2. A rough outline of the Ricci flow proof of the Poincar´eConjecture 8 3.3. OutlineoftheproofoftheGeometrizationConjecture 9 3.4. Claim 3.2 and the structure of singularities 11 3.5. The proof of Claims 3.3 and 3.4 13 4. Overview of The Entropy Formula for the Ricci Flow and its Geometric Applications [51] 13 4.1. I.1-I.6 14 4.2. I.7-I.10 15 4.3. I.11 16 NOTES ON PERELMAN’S PAPERS 3 4.4. I.12-I.13 17 5. I.1.1. The -functional and its monotonicity 18 F 6. Basic example for I.1 21 7. I.2.2. The λ-invariant and its applications 22 8. I.2.3. The rescaled λ-invariant 24 9. I.2.4. Gradient steady solitons on compact manifolds 25 10. Ricci flow as a gradient flow 26 11. The -functional 27 W 12. I.3.1. Monotonicity of the -functional 28 W 13. I.4. The no local collapsing theorem I 30 14. I.5. The -functional as a time derivative 32 W 15. I.7. Overview of reduced length and reduced volume 33 16. Basic example for I.7 34 17. Remarks about -Geodesics and exp 34 L L 18. I.(7.3)-(7.6). First derivatives of L 37 19. I.(7.7). Second variation of 39 L 20. I.(7.8)-(7.9). Hessian bound for L 41 21. I.(7.10). The Laplacian of L 42 22. I.(7.11). Estimates on -Jacobi fields 42 L 23. Monotonicity of the reduced volume V 43 24. I.(7.15). A differential inequality for L 44 e 25. I.7.2. Estimates on the reduced length 46 26. I.7.3. The no local collapsing theorem II 47 27. I.8.3. Length distortion estimates 50 28. I.8.2. No local collapsing propagates forward in time and to larger scales 52 29. I.9. Perelman’s differential Harnack inequality 54 30. The statement of the pseudolocality theorem 57 31. Claim 1 of I.10.1. A point selection argument 58 32. Claim 2 of I.10.1. Getting parabolic regions 59 33. Claim 3 of I.10.1. An upper bound on the integral of v 60 34. Theorem I.10.1. Proof of the pseudolocality theorem 62 35. I.10.2. The volumes of future balls 65 36. I.10.4. κ-noncollapsing at future times 66 4 BRUCE KLEINER AND JOHN LOTT 37. I.10.5. Diffeomorphism finiteness 66 38. I.11.1. κ-solutions 67 39. I.11.2. Asymptotic solitons 68 40. I.11.3. Two dimensional κ-solutions 70 41. I.11.4. Asymptotic scalar curvature and asymptotic volume ratio 70 42. Ina κ-solution, the curvature and the normalized volume control each other 74 43. An alternate proof of Corollary 40.1 using Proposition 41.13 and Corollary 42.1 76 44. I.11.5. A volume bound 77 45. I.11.6. Curvature bounds for Ricci flow solutions with nonnegative curvature operator, assuming a lower volume bound 78 46. I.11.7. Compactness of the space of three-dimensional κ-solutions 80 47. I.11.8. Necklike behavior at infinity of a three-dimensional κ-solution - weak version 82 48. I.11.8. Necklike behavior at infinity of a three-dimensional κ-solution - strong version 83 49. More properties of κ-solutions 85 50. I.11.9. Getting a uniform value of κ 85 51. II.1.2. Three-dimensional noncompact κ-noncollapsed gradient shrinkers are standard 86 52. I.12.1. Canonical neighborhood theorem 89 53. I.12.2. Later scalar curvature bounds on bigger balls from curvature and volume bounds 96 54. I.12.3. Earlier scalar curvature bounds on smaller balls from lower curvature bounds and volume bounds 99 55. I.12.4. Small balls with strongly negative curvature are volume-collapsed 101 56. I.13.1. Thick-thin decomposition for nonsingular flows 102 57. Overview of Ricci Flow with Surgery on Three-Manifolds [52] 103 57.1. II.1-II.3 104 57.2. II.4-II.5 104 57.3. II.6-II.8 107 58. II. Notation and terminology 108 59. II.1. Three-dimensional κ-solutions 110 60. II.2. Standard solutions 113 61. Claim 2 of II.2. The blow-up time for a standard solution is 1 115 ≤ 62. Claim 4 of II.2. The blow-up time of a standard solution is 1 115 NOTES ON PERELMAN’S PAPERS 5 63. Claim 5 of II.2. Canonical neighborhood property for standard solutions 116 64.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathematics Opportunities
    Mathematics Opportunities will be published by the American Mathematical Society, NSF Integrative Graduate by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, or jointly by the American Statistical Association and the Education and Research Institute of Mathematical Statistics. Training Support is provided for about thirty participants at each conference, and the conference organizer invites The Integrative Graduate Education and Research Training both established researchers and interested newcomers, (IGERT) program was initiated by the National Science including postdoctoral fellows and graduate students, to Foundation (NSF) to meet the challenges of educating Ph.D. attend. scientists and engineers with the interdisciplinary back- The proposal due date is April 8, 2005. For further grounds and the technical, professional, and personal information on submitting a proposal, consult the CBMS skills needed for the career demands of the future. The website, http://www.cbms.org, or contact: Conference program is intended to catalyze a cultural change in grad- Board of the Mathematical Sciences, 1529 Eighteenth Street, uate education for students, faculty, and universities by NW, Washington, DC 20036; telephone: 202-293-1170; establishing innovative models for graduate education in fax: 202-293-3412; email: [email protected] a fertile environment for collaborative research that tran- or [email protected]. scends traditional disciplinary boundaries. It is also intended to facilitate greater diversity in student participation and —From a CBMS announcement to contribute to the development of a diverse, globally aware science and engineering workforce. Supported pro- jects must be based on a multidisciplinary research theme National Academies Research and administered by a diverse group of investigators from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AROUND PERELMAN's PROOF of the POINCARÉ CONJECTURE S. Finashin After 3 Years of Thorough Inspection, Perelman's Proof of Th
    AROUND PERELMAN'S PROOF OF THE POINCARE¶ CONJECTURE S. Finashin Abstract. Certain life principles of Perelman may look unusual, as it often happens with outstanding people. But his rejection of the Fields medal seems natural in the context of various activities followed his breakthrough in mathematics. Cet animal est tr`esm¶echant, quand on l'attaque, il se d¶efend. Folklore After 3 years of thorough inspection, Perelman's proof of the Poincar¶eConjecture was ¯nally recognized by the consensus of experts. Three groups of researchers not only veri¯ed its details, but also published their own expositions, clarifying the proofs in several hundreds of pages, on the level \available to graduate students". The solution of the Poincar¶eConjecture was the central event discussed in the International Congress of Mathematicians in Madrid, in August 2006 (ICM-2006), which gave to it a flavor of a historical congress. Additional attention to the personality of Perelman was attracted by his rejec- tion of the Fields medal. Some other of his decisions are also non-conventional and tradition-breaking, for example Perelman's refusal to submit his works to journals. Many people ¯nd these decisions strange, but I ¯nd them logical and would rather criticize certain bad traditions in the modern organization of science. One such tradition is a kind of tolerance to unfair credit for mathematical results. Another big problem is the journals, which are often transforming into certain clubs closed for aliens, or into pro¯table businesses, enjoying the free work of many mathemati- cians. Sometimes the role of the \organizers of science" in mathematics also raises questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Differences of Ricci Flow Between Perelman and Hamilton About the Poincaré Conjecture and the Geometrization Conjecture Of
    Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA September 2017, Volume 7, No. 9, pp. 662–670 Doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/09.07.2017/007 © Academic Star Publishing Company, 2017 http://www.academicstar.us The Differences of Ricci Flow between Perelman and Hamilton about the Poincaré Conjecture and the Geometrization Conjecture of Thurston for Mathematics Lectures Karasawa Toshimitsu (YPM Mara Education Foundation/Univertiti Kuala Lumpur, Japan) Abstract: In this paper, it will be given the ideas of the proof the Poincaré conjecture and the geometrization conjecture of Thurston by Perelman who is a Russian mathematician posted the first of a series of three e-prints. Perelman’s proof uses a modified version of a Ricci flow program developed by Richard Streit Hamilton. Someone said that the major contributors of this work are Hamilton and Perelman. Actually Ricci flow was pioneered by Hamilton. But the version of surgery needed for Perelman’s argument which is extremely delicate as one need to ensure that all the properties of Ricci flow used in the argument also hold for Ricci flow with surgery. Running the surgery in reverse, this establishes the full geometry conjecture of Thurston, and in particular the Poincaré conjecture as a special and simpler case. This is the excellent thing for the mathematics lecturer to find in his/her mathematics education. Keywords: Ricci Flow, Poincaré conjecture, Geometrization conjecture, Perelman, Hamilton 1. Introduction The Poincaré conjecture was one of the most important open questions in topology before being proved. In 2000, it was named one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems which were conceived to record some of the most difficult problems with which mathematicians were grappling at the turn of the second millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1996–1997
    Department of Mathematics Cornell University Annual Report 1996Ð97 Year in Review: Mathematics Instruction and Research Dedication Wolfgang H. J. Fuchs This annual report is dedicated to the memory of Wolfgang H. J. Fuchs, professor emeritus of mathematics at Cornell University, who died February 24, 1997, at his home. Born on May 19, 1915, in Munich, Germany, Wolfgang moved to England in 1933 and enrolled at Cambridge University, where he received his B.A. in 1936 and his Ph.D. in 1941. He held various teaching positions in Great Britain between 1938 and 1950. During the 1948Ð49 academic year, he held a visiting position in the Mathematics Department at Cornell University. He returned to the Ithaca community in 1950 as a permanent member of the department, where he continued to work vigorously even after his ofÞcial retirement in 1985. He was chairman of the Mathematics Department from 1969 to 1973. His academic honors include a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Fulbright-Hays Research Fellowship, and a Humboldt Senior Scientist award. Wolfgang was a renowned mathematician who specialized in the classical theory of functions of one complex variable, especially Nevanlinna theory and approximation theory. His fundamental discoveries in Nevanlinna theory, many of them the product of an extended collaboration with Albert Edrei, reshaped the theory and have profoundly inßuenced two generations of mathematicians. His colleagues will remember him both for his mathematical achievements and for his remarkable good humor and generosity of spirit. He is survived by his wife, Dorothee Fuchs, his children Ñ Annie (Harley) Campbell, John Fuchs and Claudia (Lewis McClellen) Fuchs Ñ and by his grandchildren: Storn and Cody Cook, and Lorenzo and Natalia Fuchs McClellen.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTERS to the EDITOR Responses to ”A Word From… Abigail Thompson”
    LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Responses to ”A Word from… Abigail Thompson” Thank you to all those who have written letters to the editor about “A Word from… Abigail Thompson” in the Decem- ber 2019 Notices. I appreciate your sharing your thoughts on this important topic with the community. This section contains letters received through December 31, 2019, posted in the order in which they were received. We are no longer updating this page with letters in response to “A Word from… Abigail Thompson.” —Erica Flapan, Editor in Chief Re: Letter by Abigail Thompson Sincerely, Dear Editor, Blake Winter I am writing regarding the article in Vol. 66, No. 11, of Assistant Professor of Mathematics, Medaille College the Notices of the AMS, written by Abigail Thompson. As a mathematics professor, I am very concerned about en- (Received November 20, 2019) suring that the intellectual community of mathematicians Letter to the Editor is focused on rigor and rational thought. I believe that discrimination is antithetical to this ideal: to paraphrase I am writing in support of Abigail Thompson’s opinion the Greek geometer, there is no royal road to mathematics, piece (AMS Notices, 66(2019), 1778–1779). We should all because before matters of pure reason, we are all on an be grateful to her for such a thoughtful argument against equal footing. In my own pursuit of this goal, I work to mandatory “Diversity Statements” for job applicants. As mentor mathematics students from diverse and disadvan- she so eloquently stated, “The idea of using a political test taged backgrounds, including volunteering to help tutor as a screen for job applicants should send a shiver down students at other institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Prize Is Awarded to the Author of an Outstanding Expository Article on a Mathematical Topic
    BALTIMORE • JAN 16–19, 2019 January 2019 BALTIMORE • JAN 16–19, 2019 Prizes and Awards 4:25 P.M., Thursday, January 17, 2019 64 PAGES | SPINE: 1/8" PROGRAM OPENING REMARKS Kenneth A. Ribet, American Mathematical Society CHAUVENET PRIZE Mathematical Association of America EULER BOOK PRIZE Mathematical Association of America THE DEBORAH AND FRANKLIN TEPPER HAIMO AWARDS FOR DISTINGUISHED COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS Mathematical Association of America YUEH-GIN GUNG AND DR.CHARLES Y. HU AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE TO MATHEMATICS Mathematical Association of America LOUISE HAY AWARD FOR CONTRIBUTION TO MATHEMATICS EDUCATION Association for Women in Mathematics M. GWENETH HUMPHREYS AWARD FOR MENTORSHIP OF UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN IN MATHEMATICS Association for Women in Mathematics JOAN &JOSEPH BIRMAN PRIZE IN TOPOLOGY AND GEOMETRY Association for Women in Mathematics FRANK AND BRENNIE MORGAN PRIZE FOR OUTSTANDING RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS BY AN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT American Mathematical Society Mathematical Association of America Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics COMMUNICATIONS AWARD Joint Policy Board for Mathematics NORBERT WIENER PRIZE IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS American Mathematical Society Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics LEVI L. CONANT PRIZE American Mathematical Society E. H. MOORE RESEARCH ARTICLE PRIZE American Mathematical Society MARY P. D OLCIANI PRIZE FOR EXCELLENCE IN RESEARCH American Mathematical Society DAVID P. R OBBINS PRIZE American Mathematical Society OSWALD VEBLEN PRIZE IN GEOMETRY
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Vanishing act has math pros re-solving riddle http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/08/20/MN... Return to regular view Print This Article Vanishing act has math pros re-solving riddle - Dennis Overbye, New York Times Sunday, August 20, 2006 Grisha Perelman, where are you? Three years ago, a Russian mathematician by the name of Grigory Perelman, a.k.a. Grisha, in St. Petersburg, announced that he had solved a famous and intractable mathematical problem, known as the Poincare conjecture, about the nature of space. After posting a few short papers on the Internet and making a whirlwind lecture tour of the United States, Perelman disappeared back into the Russian woods in the spring of 2003, leaving the world's mathematicians to pick up the pieces and decide if he was right. Now they say they have finished his work, and the evidence is circulating among scholars in the form of three book-length papers with about 1,000 pages of dense mathematics and prose among them. As a result there is a growing feeling, a cautious optimism that they have finally achieved a landmark not just of mathematics, but of human thought. "It's really a great moment in mathematics," said Bruce Kleiner of Yale, who has spent the past three years helping to explicate Perelman's work. "It could have happened 100 years from now, or never." In a speech at a conference in Beijing this summer, Shing-Tung Yau of Harvard said the understanding of three-dimensional space brought about by Poincare's conjecture could be one of the major pillars of math in the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • View This Volume's Front and Back Matter
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/gsm/077 Hamilton's Ricci Flow This page intentionally left blank Hamilton' s Ricc i Flo w Bennett Chow Peng Lu Lei Ni Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volum e 11 j^^ MtSJff l America n Mathematica l Societ y Wm^jz Scienc e Pres s Editorial Board David Cox Walter Craig Nikolai Ivanov Steven G. Krantz David Saltman (Chair) This edition is published by the American Mathematical Society under license from Science Press. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53C44, 53C21, 58J35, 35K55. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/gsm-77 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Chow, Bennett. Hamilton's Ricci flow / Bennett Chow, Peng Lu, and Lei Ni. p. cm. — (Graduate studies in mathematics, ISSN 1065-7339 ; v. 77) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8218-4231-7 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8218-4231-5 (alk. paper) 1. Global differential geometry. 2. Ricci flow. 3. Riemannian manifolds. I. Lu, Peng, 1964- II. Ni, Lei, 1969- III. Title. QA670.C455 2006 516.3/62—dc22 2006043027 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poincaré Conjecture
    Smalltalk: The Poincar´eConjecture Brian Heinold Mount St. Mary's University April 11, 2017 1 / 59 Let's examine each term so we can understand the whole statement. The Poincar´eConjecture Statement of the problem, as given on Wikipedia: Every simply connected, closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. 2 / 59 The Poincar´eConjecture Statement of the problem, as given on Wikipedia: Every simply connected, closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. Let's examine each term so we can understand the whole statement. 3 / 59 Simply Connected Every simply connected, closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere. 4 / 59 Simply Connected Roughly speaking, a 2D region is simply connected if it has no holes, like below. 5 / 59 Imagine hitting the circles with a shrink ray. Will they be able to get as small as we like, or will the region get in the way? Simply Connected More formally, a region is simply connected if every closed curve can be shrunk to a point without leaving the region. 6 / 59 Simply Connected More formally, a region is simply connected if every closed curve can be shrunk to a point without leaving the region. Imagine hitting the circles with a shrink ray. Will they be able to get as small as we like, or will the region get in the way? 7 / 59 Simply Connected This applies in higher dimensions as well. For 3D shapes, there can be holes, but they can't \go all the way through" the object. The same curve definition applies here as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture
    Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture CARLO MANTEGAZZA Pisa 10 September 2016 Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Geometric Flows The Ricci Flow – Richard Hamilton The Program to Prove Poincare´ Conjecture The Difficulties The Work of Grisha Perelman The Proof of Poincare´ Conjecture Other Developments Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Poincare´ and the Birth of Topology Even if several results that to- day we call “topological” were already previously known, it is with Poincare` (1854–1912), the last universalist, that topology (Analysis Situs) gets its modern form. In particular, regarding the prop- erties of surfaces or higher di- mensional spaces. Poincare´ introduced the funda- mental concept of simple con- nectedness. Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Surfaces – Examples Closed surfaces (compact, without boundary, orientable): Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Surfaces – Examples Closed surfaces (compact, without boundary, orientable): Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Surfaces – Examples Closed surfaces (compact, without boundary, orientable): Perelman, the Ricci Flow and the Poincare´ Conjecture The Poincare´ Conjecture Surfaces – Examples Closed surfaces (compact, without boundary, orientable): Perelman, the Ricci Flow
    [Show full text]
  • Seed: Not Feeling the Fields file:///Users/Joshuaroebke/Desktop/My Articles/Fields.Html
    Seed: Not Feeling the Fields file:///Users/joshuaroebke/Desktop/My Articles/Fields.html PHYSICS & MATH Not Feeling the Fields Grisha Perelman becomes the first person ever to turn down math's top prize. by JOSHUA ROEBKE • Posted August 25, 2006 12:41 AM Grigory Perelman lives with his mother in an undistinguished apartment in St. Petersburg, Russia. On Tuesday, August 22, rather than being honored at a palace in Madrid, where he would receive a gold medallion from King Juan Carlos of Spain, he was probably in his flat, enjoying a late lunch of borscht or writing equations in solitude. Perelman is the first person in history to turn down the Fields Medal, mathematics' biggest prize. It's an honor he won the right to refuse by audaciously solving the hundred-year-old Poincaré conjecture. The week-long International Congress of Mathematicians has attracted nearly 5,000 Grisha Perelman Courtesy International Congress of Mathematicians Press mathematicians from 100 countries to the Spanish capital. Like the Olympics, the very Office best travel to the host city from all corners of the globe every four years, where they put their hard work and talents on display and see who takes home the gold medals. "There are always lots of rumors swirling around before the Congress," said Columbia University mathematician John Morgan. "And basically everybody is there to see the Fields." This year's Congress is not unlike a major sporting event--there's the pre-event buzz, not to mention the tender age of most of the competitors. Like athletics, math is a game for the young.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Conant Prize
    2009 Conant Prize John W. Morgan received the 2009 AMS Levi L. undergoing scrutiny by experts. It made the Conant Prize at the 115th Annual Meeting of the momentous developments surrounding the con- AMS in Washington, DC, in January 2009. jectures of Poincaré and Thurston accessible to a wide mathematical audience. The article captured Citation key concepts and results from topology and dif- The Levi L. Conant Prize for 2009 is awarded to ferential geometry and conveyed to the reader the John Morgan for his article, “Recent progress on significance of the advances. the Poincaré Conjecture and the classification of Morgan’s exposition is elegant and mathemati- 3-manifolds”, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (2005), cally precise. The paper transmits a great amount 57–78. of information in a seemingly effortless flow of The celebrated Poincaré Con- mathematical ideas from across a broad spectrum jecture, formulated in modern of topics. It was a valuable survey when it appeared terms, asks, “Is a closed 3-mani- and remains so today. fold having trivial fundamen- tal group diffeomorphic to the Biographical Sketch 3-dimensional sphere?” This Morgan received his Ph.D. in mathematics from conjecture evolved from Poin- Rice University in 1969. From 1969 to 1972 he caré’s 1904 paper and inspired was an instructor at Princeton University, and an enormous amount of work from 1972 to 1974 an assistant professor at the in 3-dimensional topology in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. From 1974 the ensuing century. Thurston’s to 1976 he was member of Institut des Hautes Geometrization Conjecture sub- Etudes Scientifiques in Paris.
    [Show full text]