DOCSLIB.ORG

A Century of Advancing Mathematics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Century of Advancing Mathematics c 2015 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated) Library of Congress Control Number: 2015936096 Print ISBN: 978-0-88385-588-1 Electronic ISBN: 978-1-61444-522-7 Printed in the United States of America Current Printing (last digit): 10987654321 A Century of Advancing Mathematics Stephen F. Kennedy, Editor Associate Editors Donald J. Albers Gerald L. Alexanderson Della Dumbaugh Frank A. Farris Deanna B. Haunsperger Paul Zorn ® Published and distributed by The Mathematical Association of America Contents Preface ........................................................................ ix Part I Mathematical Developments 1 The Hyperbolic Revolution: From Topology to Geometry, and Back .................. 3 Francis Bonahon A CenturyofComplexDynamics ................................................ 15 Daniel Alexander and Robert L. Devaney Map-ColoringProblems ........................................................ 35 Robin Wilson SixMilestonesinGeometry ..................................................... 51 Frank Morgan Defying God: the Stanley-Wilf Conjecture, Stanley-Wilf Limits, and a Two-GenerationExplosionof Combinatorics ............................ 65 Eric S. Egge WhatIstheBestApproachtoCountingPrimes? .................................. 83 Andrew Granville A CenturyofEllipticCurves ................................................... 117 Joseph H. Silverman Part II Historical Developments 133 The Mathematical Association of America: Its First 100 Years .................... 135 David E. Zitarelli The Stratification of the American Mathematical Community: The Mathematical Association of America and the American Mathematical Society, 1915–1925 . 159 Karen Hunger Parshall Time and Place: Sustainingthe American Mathematical Community ............... 177 Della Dumbaugh Abstract (Modern) Algebra in America 1870–1950:A Brief Account .............. 191 Israel Kleiner Part III Pedagogical Developments 217 The History of the Undergraduate Program in Mathematics in theUnitedStates ..... 219 Alan Tucker v vi A Century of Advancing Mathematics Inquiry-BasedLearningThroughthe LifeoftheMAA ............................ 239 Michael Starbird A PassporttoPleasure ......................................................... 253 Bob Kaplan and Ellen Kaplan Strength in Numbers: Broadening the View of the Mathematics Major ............. 257 Rhonda Hughes A Historyof Undergraduate Research in Mathematics ............................ 263 Joseph A. Gallian The CalculusReformMovement: A Personal Account ............................ 275 Paul Zorn Introducing ex ................................................................ 283 Gilbert Strang Part IV Computational Developments 295 Computational Experiences in the Pre-Electronic Days .. ... ...................... 297 Philip J. Davis A CenturyofVisualization:One Geometer’s View ............................... 301 Thomas F. Banchoff TheFutureofMathematics:1965to2065 ....................................... 313 Jonathan M. Borwein Part V Culture and Communities 331 Philosophy of Mathematics: What Has Happened Since G¨odel’s Results? ........... 333 Bonnie Gold Twelve Classics People who Love Mathematics Should Know; or, “Whatdoyoumean, youhaven’t read E.T.Bell? ............................ 351 Gerald L. Alexanderson The Dramatic Life of Mathematics: A Centennial History of the Intersection of Mathematics and Theater in a Prologue, Three Acts, and an Epilogue .......... 365 Stephen D. Abbott 2007:TheYearofEuler ....................................................... 379 William Dunham The PutnamCompetition:Origin,Lore, Structure ................................ 387 Leonard F. Klosinski GettingInvolvedwiththeMAA:APath Less Traveled ........................... 393 Ezra “Bud” Brown HenryL.Alder ............................................................... 397 Donald J. Albers and Gerald L. Alexanderson LidaK.Barrett ............................................................... 401 Kenneth A. Ross RalphP.Boas ................................................................ 405 Daniel Zelinsky Contents vii LeonardGillman—Reminiscences ............................................ 407 Martha J. Siegel PaulHalmos:NoApologies .................................................... 411 John Ewing IvanNiven ................................................................... 415 Kenneth A. Ross GeorgeP´olyaandtheMAA .................................................... 421 Gerald L. Alexanderson Preface Searching, in the early years of the twentieth century, for a source of support for the fledg- ing and financially unstable American Mathematical Monthly Herbert Ellsworth Slaught conceived the idea of a new society. Our MAA was founded in 1915 to serve as a home for the Monthly. The full details of that story are contained in David Zitarelli’s contribution to this volume beginning on page 135. Within a decade we had published our first book, Calculus of Variations by G. A. Bliss. We now publishthree world-class print journals, one magazine, a newsmagazine, eight book series, and a host of online material. Our identity, from our inceptionrising from the Monthly’sneed for support up to the present-day centen- nial celebration, is firmly rooted in extraordinary exposition of mathematics. This makes it fitting to produce a volume of essays by some of the great mathematicians and expositors writing today as part of that celebration. But, Slaught’s vision was larger and the MAA’s mission has always been much more than just producing great expository mathematics. That mission—to advance the mathe- matical sciences, especially at the collegiate level—has been reflected in the Association’s deep engagement with pedagogical practices and public policy issues, with the history and philosophy of mathematics, and with the connections between mathematics and the arts and other sciences. It seems only natural for this volume to sample from the entire broad cultural sweep of mathematics throughout the century of the MAA’s existence. To organize this broad collection of material, the present volume is divided thematically into five sections. First, of course, comes the mathematics. The MAA century began, mathematically speaking, at the tail end of the move towards axiomatization and formalism that started in the nineteenth century. That movement, finished off by Kurt G¨odel’s stunner in the early thirties, gave way to a movement towards deep abstraction and ever increasing distance be- tween, so-called, pure and applied mathematics. The introduction of computing machines has, over the past decades, heightened interest in heuristic and algorithmicthinking and en- ergized areas like chaotic dynamics and combinatorics where computing power can reveal new phenomena and prime new intuitions. Our section on mathematical developments includes some legendary, and some new, voices in mathematical exposition. Bob Devaney and Dan Alexander chronicle the early history of complex dynamics, touring the highlights up to the present day. Eric Egge takes on the challengingtask of givingus a lookat the explosionof interest in combinatoricsover the last few decades, focusing on the astounding developments surrounding the Stanley- Wilf Conjecture. Along the lines of famous conjectures that have fallen—Joe Silverman will show us some of the details that unraveled Fermat’s Last Theorem and Robin Wil- son takes us on a historico-mathematical magic ride through the story of the Four-Color ix x A Century of Advancing Mathematics Theorem. Frank Morgan chooses his favorite half-dozen geometric milestones of the last few decades and Andrew Granville gives us a new way to think about the Prime Number Theorem after a deep, and deeply historical, tour through our efforts to count the primes. Finally, Francis Bonahon pays tribute to the contributions of Bill Thurston in unearthing the deep connections between geometry, particularly hyperbolic geometry, and topology. From the very beginning the MAA has been about more than just world-class expo- sition; within three months of our founding the organization had constituted the National Committee on Mathematics Requirements charged with investigating the teaching of sec- ondary and post-secondary mathematics, making curricular recommendations, and working towards improving the teaching of mathematics. It is fitting that we devote a section of this volume to the pedagogy of mathematics. A commitment to effective teaching and learning of mathematics is in the organization’s DNA; the perceived lack of such a commitment from our sister organization contributed to the movement that led to the MAA’s found- ing. Alan Tucker leads off with a fascinating history of the evolution of the undergraduate mathematics major. Joe Gallian, the founding father of the mathematics REU, recounts the early history of that pedagogical innovation. Michael Starbird writes historically and per- suasively about inquiry-based pedagogy, while Bob and Ellen Kaplan—the founders of the original Math Circle—write, passionately and lyrically, on the same topic. Rhonda Hughes offers advice on attracting underrepresented groups to our subject. Gil Strang tells us how we ought to teach the exponential function; and Paul Zorn, a key player in the Calculus Reform movement, tells us what that movement hoped to achieve. Zorn’s contributionhighlightshow calculus teaching was changed, even given new life, by computing technology. Egge and Alexander & Devaney made clear that massive compu- tational power wrought seismic
Recommended publications
  • Hyperbolic Manifolds: an Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More Information

    Hyperbolic Manifolds: an Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11674-0 - Hyperbolic Manifolds: An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More information HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLDS An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Over the past three decades there has been a total revolution in the classic branch of mathematics called 3-dimensional topology, namely the discovery that most solid 3-dimensional shapes are hyperbolic 3-manifolds. This book introduces and explains hyperbolic geometry and hyperbolic 3- and 2-dimensional manifolds in the first two chapters, and then goes on to develop the subject. The author discusses the profound discoveries of the astonishing features of these 3-manifolds, helping the reader to understand them without going into long, detailed formal proofs. The book is heav- ily illustrated with pictures, mostly in color, that help explain the manifold properties described in the text. Each chapter ends with a set of Exercises and Explorations that both challenge the reader to prove assertions made in the text, and suggest fur- ther topics to explore that bring additional insight. There is an extensive index and bibliography. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11674-0 - Hyperbolic Manifolds: An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More information [Thurston’s Jewel (JB)(DD)] Thurston’s Jewel: Illustrated is the convex hull of the limit set of a kleinian group G associated with a hyperbolic manifold M(G) with a single, incompressible boundary component. The translucent convex hull is pictured lying over p. 8.43 of Thurston [1979a] where the theory behind the construction of such convex hulls was first formulated.
  • Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article

    Arxiv:1006.1489V2 [Math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 Ril.Ias Rfie Rmraigtesre Rils[14 Articles Survey the Reading from Profited Also I Article

    Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly Volume 8, Number 1 (Special Issue: In honor of F. Thomas Farrell and Lowell E. Jones, Part 1 of 2 ) 1—14, 2012 The Work of Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones in Topology and Geometry James F. Davis∗ Tom Farrell and Lowell Jones caused a paradigm shift in high-dimensional topology, away from the view that high-dimensional topology was, at its core, an algebraic subject, to the current view that geometry, dynamics, and analysis, as well as algebra, are key for classifying manifolds whose fundamental group is infinite. Their collaboration produced about fifty papers over a twenty-five year period. In this tribute for the special issue of Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly in their honor, I will survey some of the impact of their joint work and mention briefly their individual contributions – they have written about one hundred non-joint papers. 1 Setting the stage arXiv:1006.1489v2 [math.GT] 8 Aug 2010 In order to indicate the Farrell–Jones shift, it is necessary to describe the situation before the onset of their collaboration. This is intimidating – during the period of twenty-five years starting in the early fifties, manifold theory was perhaps the most active and dynamic area of mathematics. Any narrative will have omissions and be non-linear. Manifold theory deals with the classification of ∗I thank Shmuel Weinberger and Tom Farrell for their helpful comments on a draft of this article. I also profited from reading the survey articles [14] and [4]. 2 James F. Davis manifolds. There is an existence question – when is there a closed manifold within a particular homotopy type, and a uniqueness question, what is the classification of manifolds within a homotopy type? The fifties were the foundational decade of manifold theory.
  • Hilbert Constance Reid

    Hilbert Constance Reid

    Hilbert Constance Reid Hilbert c COPERNICUS AN IMPRINT OF SPRINGER-VERLAG © 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York Originally published by Springer-Verlag New York, Inc in 1996 All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Library ofCongress Cataloging·in-Publication Data Reid, Constance. Hilbert/Constance Reid. p. Ctn. Originally published: Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag, 1970. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-387-94674-0 ISBN 978-1-4612-0739-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0739-9 I. Hilbert, David, 1862-1943. 2. Mathematicians-Germany­ Biography. 1. Title. QA29.HsR4 1996 SIO'.92-dc20 [B] 96-33753 Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 543 2 1 ISBN 978-0-387-94674-0 SPIN 10524543 Questions upon Rereading Hilbert By 1965 I had written several popular books, such as From liro to Infinity and A Long Way from Euclid, in which I had attempted to explain certain easily grasped, although often quite sophisticated, mathematical ideas for readers very much like myself-interested in mathematics but essentially untrained. At this point, with almost no mathematical training and never having done any bio­ graphical writing, I became determined to write the life of David Hilbert, whom many considered the profoundest mathematician of the early part of the 20th century. Now, thirty years later, rereading Hilbert, certain questions come to my mind.
  • Publications of Members, 1930-1954

    Publications of Members, 1930-1954

    THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY PUBLICATIONS OF MEMBERS 1930 • 1954 PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY . 1955 COPYRIGHT 1955, BY THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, PRINCETON, N.J. CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 DIRECTORY OF INSTITUTE MEMBERS, 1930-1954 205 MEMBERS WITH APPOINTMENTS OF LONG TERM 265 TRUSTEES 269 buH FOREWORD FOREWORD Publication of this bibliography marks the 25th Anniversary of the foundation of the Institute for Advanced Study. The certificate of incorporation of the Institute was signed on the 20th day of May, 1930. The first academic appointments, naming Albert Einstein and Oswald Veblen as Professors at the Institute, were approved two and one- half years later, in initiation of academic work. The Institute for Advanced Study is devoted to the encouragement, support and patronage of learning—of science, in the old, broad, undifferentiated sense of the word. The Institute partakes of the character both of a university and of a research institute j but it also differs in significant ways from both. It is unlike a university, for instance, in its small size—its academic membership at any one time numbers only a little over a hundred. It is unlike a university in that it has no formal curriculum, no scheduled courses of instruction, no commitment that all branches of learning be rep- resented in its faculty and members. It is unlike a research institute in that its purposes are broader, that it supports many separate fields of study, that, with one exception, it maintains no laboratories; and above all in that it welcomes temporary members, whose intellectual development and growth are one of its principal purposes.
  • On the Similarity Transformation Between a Matirx and Its Transpose

    On the Similarity Transformation Between a Matirx and Its Transpose

    Pacific Journal of Mathematics ON THE SIMILARITY TRANSFORMATION BETWEEN A MATIRX AND ITS TRANSPOSE OLGA TAUSSKY AND HANS ZASSENHAUS Vol. 9, No. 3 July 1959 ON THE SIMILARITY TRANSFORMATION BETWEEN A MATRIX AND ITS TRANSPOSE OLGA TAUSSKY AND HANS ZASSENHAUS It was observed by one of the authors that a matrix transforming a companion matrix into its transpose is symmetric. The following two questions arise: I. Does there exist for every square matrix with coefficients in a field a non-singular symmetric matrix transforming it into its transpose ? II. Under which conditions is every matrix transforming a square matrix into its transpose symmetric? The answer is provided by THEOREM 1. For every n x n matrix A — (aik) with coefficients in a field F there is a non-singular symmetric matrix transforming A into its transpose Aτ'. THEOREM 2. Every non-singular matrix transforming A into its transpose is symmetric if and only if the minimal polynomial of A is equal to its characteristic polynomial i.e. if A is similar to a com- panion matrix. Proof. Let T = (ti1c) be a solution matrix of the system Σ(A) of the linear homogeneous equations. (1) TA-ATT=O ( 2 ) T - Tτ = 0 . The system Σ(A) is equivalent to the system (3) TA-ATTT = 0 ( 4 ) T - Tτ = 0 which states that Γand TA are symmetric. This system involves n2 — n equations and hence is of rank n2 — n at most. Thus there are at least n linearly independent solutions of Σ(A).1 On the other hand it is well known that there is a non-singular matrix To satisfying - A* , Received December 18, 1958.
  • Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Department Of

    Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Department Of

    Basilios Bessarion Mystras 1436 Guarino da Verona Johannes Argyropoulos 1408 Università di Padova 1444 Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Vittorino da Feltre Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Università di Padova 1416 Università di Firenze 1462 Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo Angelo Poliziano Florens Florentius Radwyn Radewyns Geert Gerardus Magnus Groote Università di Mantova 1433 Università di Mantova Università di Firenze 1477 Constantinople 1433 DepartmentThe Mathematics Genealogy Project of is a serviceMathematics of North Dakota State University and and the American Statistics Mathematical Society. Demetrios Chalcocondyles http://www.mathgenealogy.org/ Heinrich von Langenstein Gaetano da Thiene Sigismondo Polcastro Leo Outers Moses Perez Scipione Fortiguerra Rudolf Agricola Thomas von Kempen à Kempis Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Accademia Romana 1452 Université de Paris 1363, 1375 Université Catholique de Louvain 1485 Università di Firenze 1493 Università degli Studi di Ferrara 1478 Mystras 1452 Jan Standonck Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin Johannes von Gmunden Nicoletto Vernia Pietro Roccabonella Pelope Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Jean Tagault François Dubois Janus Lascaris Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro Matthaeus Adrianus Alexander Hegius Johannes Stöffler Collège Sainte-Barbe 1474 Universität Basel 1477 Universität Wien 1406 Università di Padova Università di Padova Université Catholique de Louvain 1504, 1515 Université de Paris 1516 Università di Padova 1472 Università
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013

    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013

    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
  • RM Calendar 2017

    RM Calendar 2017

    Rudi Mathematici x3 – 6’135x2 + 12’545’291 x – 8’550’637’845 = 0 www.rudimathematici.com 1 S (1803) Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja RM132 (1878) Agner Krarup Erlang Rudi Mathematici (1894) Satyendranath Bose RM168 (1912) Boris Gnedenko 1 2 M (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius (1905) Lev Genrichovich Shnirelman (1938) Anatoly Samoilenko 3 T (1917) Yuri Alexeievich Mitropolsky January 4 W (1643) Isaac Newton RM071 5 T (1723) Nicole-Reine Etable de Labrière Lepaute (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille Jordan Putnam 2002, A1 (1871) Federigo Enriques RM084 Let k be a fixed positive integer. The n-th derivative of (1871) Gino Fano k k n+1 1/( x −1) has the form P n(x)/(x −1) where P n(x) is a 6 F (1807) Jozeph Mitza Petzval polynomial. Find P n(1). (1841) Rudolf Sturm 7 S (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Emile Borel A college football coach walked into the locker room (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher Paley before a big game, looked at his star quarterback, and 8 S (1888) Richard Courant RM156 said, “You’re academically ineligible because you failed (1924) Paul Moritz Cohn your math mid-term. But we really need you today. I (1942) Stephen William Hawking talked to your math professor, and he said that if you 2 9 M (1864) Vladimir Adreievich Steklov can answer just one question correctly, then you can (1915) Mollie Orshansky play today. So, pay attention. I really need you to 10 T (1875) Issai Schur concentrate on the question I’m about to ask you.” (1905) Ruth Moufang “Okay, coach,” the player agreed.
  • Historical Notes on Loop Theory

    Historical Notes on Loop Theory

    Comment.Math.Univ.Carolin. 41,2 (2000)359–370 359 Historical notes on loop theory Hala Orlik Pflugfelder Abstract. This paper deals with the origins and early history of loop theory, summarizing the period from the 1920s through the 1960s. Keywords: quasigroup theory, loop theory, history Classification: Primary 01A60; Secondary 20N05 This paper is an attempt to map, to fit together not only in a geographical and a chronological sense but also conceptually, the various areas where loop theory originated and through which it moved during the early part of its 70 years of history. 70 years is not very much compared to, say, over 300 years of differential calculus. But it is precisely because loop theory is a relatively young subject that it is often misinterpreted. Therefore, it is extremely important for us to acknowledge its distinctive origins. To give an example, when somebody asks, “What is a loop?”, the simplest way to explain is to say, “it is a group without associativity”. This is true, but it is not the whole truth. It is essential to emphasize that loop theory is not just a generalization of group theory but a discipline of its own, originating from and still moving within four basic research areas — algebra, geometry, topology, and combinatorics. Looking back on the first 50 years of loop history, one can see that every decade initiated a new and important phase in its development. These distinct periods can be summarized as follows: I. 1920s the first glimmerings of non-associativity II. 1930s the defining period (Germany) III. 1940s-60s building the basic algebraic frame and new approaches to projective geometry (United States) IV.
  • Cusp Geometry of Fibered 3-Manifolds

    Cusp Geometry of Fibered 3-Manifolds

    CUSP GEOMETRY OF FIBERED 3{MANIFOLDS DAVID FUTER AND SAUL SCHLEIMER Abstract. Let F be a surface and suppose that ': F ! F is a pseudo-Anosov homeomor- phism, fixing a puncture p of F . The mapping torus M = M' is hyperbolic and contains a maximal cusp C about the puncture p. We show that the area (and height) of the cusp torus @C is equal to the stable translation distance of ' acting on the arc complex A(F; p), up to an explicitly bounded multiplicative error. Our proof relies on elementary facts about the hyperbolic geometry of pleated sur- faces. In particular, the proof of this theorem does not use any deep results from Teichm¨uller theory, Kleinian group theory, or the coarse geometry of A(F; p). A similar result holds for quasi-Fuchsian manifolds N =∼ F × R. In that setting, we find a combinatorial estimate for the area (and height) of the cusp annulus in the convex core of N, up to explicitly bounded multiplicative and additive error. As an application, we show that covers of punctured surfaces induce quasi-isometric embeddings of arc complexes. 1. Introduction Following the work of Thurston, Mostow, and Prasad, it has been known for over three decades that almost every 3{manifold with torus boundary admits a hyperbolic structure [37], which is necessarily unique up to isometry [30, 33]. Thus, in principle, it is possible to trans- late combinatorial data about a 3{manifold into a detailed description of its geometry | and conversely, to use geometry to identify topological features. Indeed, given a triangulated manifold (up to over 100 tetrahedra) the computer program SnapPy can typically approxi- mate the manifold's hyperbolic metric to a high degree of precision [17].
  • Preface Issue 4-2014

    Preface Issue 4-2014

    Jahresber Dtsch Math-Ver (2014) 116:199–200 DOI 10.1365/s13291-014-0108-4 PREFACE Preface Issue 4-2014 Hans-Christoph Grunau © Deutsche Mathematiker-Vereinigung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 The last few years have been a good time for solving long standing geometrical- topological conjectures. This issue reports on the solution of the Willmore conject-√ ure—the “best” topological torus is a “real” torus with ratio of radii equal to 2— and one of Thurston’s conjectures—every hyperbolic 3-manifold can be fibered over a circle, up to passing to a finite cover. Starting in the 1960s, Thomas Willmore studied the integral of the squared mean curvature of surfaces in R3 as the simplest but most interesting frame invariant elas- tic bending energy. This energy had shown up already in the early 19th century—too early for a rigorous investigation. Willmore asked: What is the shape of a compact surface of fixed genus minimising the Willmore energy in this class? (In the 1990s, existence of minimisers was proved by Leon Simon, with a contribution by Matthias Bauer and Ernst Kuwert.) Willmore already knew that the genus-0-minimiser is a sphere. Assuming that symmetric surfaces require less energy than asymmetric ones (which has not been proved, yet) he studied families√ of geometric tori with the smaller radius 1 fixed and found that the larger radius 2 would yield the minimum in this very special family. He conjectured that this particular torus would be the genus- 1-minimiser. Almost 50 years later Fernando Marques and André Neves found and published a 100-page-proof.
  • Council Congratulates Exxon Education Foundation

    Council Congratulates Exxon Education Foundation

    from.qxp 4/27/98 3:17 PM Page 1315 From the AMS ics. The Exxon Education Foundation funds programs in mathematics education, elementary and secondary school improvement, undergraduate general education, and un- dergraduate developmental education. —Timothy Goggins, AMS Development Officer AMS Task Force Receives Two Grants The AMS recently received two new grants in support of its Task Force on Excellence in Mathematical Scholarship. The Task Force is carrying out a program of focus groups, site visits, and information gathering aimed at developing (left to right) Edward Ahnert, president of the Exxon ways for mathematical sciences departments in doctoral Education Foundation, AMS President Cathleen institutions to work more effectively. With an initial grant Morawetz, and Robert Witte, senior program officer for of $50,000 from the Exxon Education Foundation, the Task Exxon. Force began its work by organizing a number of focus groups. The AMS has now received a second grant of Council Congratulates Exxon $50,000 from the Exxon Education Foundation, as well as a grant of $165,000 from the National Science Foundation. Education Foundation For further information about the work of the Task Force, see “Building Excellence in Doctoral Mathematics De- At the Summer Mathfest in Burlington in August, the AMS partments”, Notices, November/December 1995, pages Council passed a resolution congratulating the Exxon Ed- 1170–1171. ucation Foundation on its fortieth anniversary. AMS Pres- ident Cathleen Morawetz presented the resolution during —Timothy Goggins, AMS Development Officer the awards banquet to Edward Ahnert, president of the Exxon Education Foundation, and to Robert Witte, senior program officer with Exxon.