Volatile Leaf Oils of Some South-Western and Southern Australian Species of the Genus Eucalyptus. Part VII. Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Exsertaria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volatile Leaf Oils of Some South-Western and Southern Australian Species of the Genus Eucalyptus. Part VII. Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Exsertaria FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, VOL. 11,35-41(1996) Volatile Leaf Oils of some South-western and Southern Australian Species of the Genus Eucalyptus. Part VII. Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Exsertaria C. M. Bignell and P. J. Dunlop Department of Chemistry, University of Adelaide, South Australia, SM5, Australia J. J. Brophy Department of Organic Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 20S2, Australia J. F. Jackson Department of Viticulture, Oenology and Horticulture, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia The volatile leaf oils of Eucalyptus seeana Maiden, E. bancrofrii (Maiden) Maiden, E. parramattensis C. Hall, E. amplifolia Naudin, E. tereticornis J. Smith, E. blakelyi Maiden, E. dealbata A. Cunn. ex. Schauer, E. dwyeri Maiden & Blakely, E. vicina L. A. S. Johnson & K. D. Hill, E. flindersii Boomsma, E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var camaldulensis, E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Blakely, E. rudis Endl., E. exserta F. Muell. and E. gillenii Ewart & L. R. Kerr, isolated by vacuum distillation, were analysed by GC-MS. Most species contained a-pinene (1.5-14%), 1,&cineole (0-81%), p-cymene (O.6-28%) and aromadendrene/terpinen-4-01 (0.6-24%) as principal leaf oil components. KEY WORDS Eucalyptus seeana Maiden; Eucalyptus bancrofrii (Maiden) Maiden; Eucalyptus parramattensis C. Hall; Eucalyptus amplifolia Naudin; Eucalyptus tereticornis J. Smith; Eucalyptus blakelyi Maiden; Eucalyptus dealbata A. Cunn. ex. Schauer; Eucalyptus dwyeri Maiden & Blakely; Eucalyptus vicina L. A. S. Johnson & K. D. Hill; Eucalyptusflindersii Boomsma; Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldulensis; Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Blakely; Eucalyptus rudis Endl.; Eucalyptus exserta F. Muell.; Eucalyptus gillenii Ewart & L. R. Kerr; Myrtaceae; leaf essential oil composition; torquatone; mono-and sesquiterpenoids; GC-MS INTRODUCTION vicina L. A. S. Johnson & K. D. Hill, E. dealbata A. Cunn. ex. Schauer, E. amplijolia Naudin and Continuing our investigation of the volatile leaf E. parramattensis C. Hall, occur mainly in New oils of indigenous Australian eucalypts'-6 we South Wales while four others, E. blakelyi have examined the oils of 15 of the species Maiden, E. rereticornis J. Smith, E. bancroftii belonging to section Exsertaria of the Eucalyptus (Maiden) Maiden and E. seeana Maiden, occur in subgenus Symphyomyrtus (see system M. I. H. New South Wales and Queensland. Finally two Brooker and D. A. Kleinig).' Locations of indi- species, E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldu- vidual species are listed in Table 1. lensis and E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Two of these, E. flindersii Boomsma and E. Blakely, are widespread along the water courses gillenii Ewart & L. R. Kerr, are native to South in most parts of eastern (var. camaldulensis), Australia, while E. rudis Endl. occurs only in central and Western Australia (var. obrusa). South-westem Australia with E. exserra F. Muell. More detailed descriptions of the occurrence of being a native of South-eastem Queensland. Five these eucalypts have been given elsewhere.7*8 other species, E. dwyeri Maiden & Blakely, E. To our knowledge the oils of E. see an^,^ E. CCC 0882-5734/%/010035-U7 Received 21 February I995 0 1996 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 18 April 1995 36 C. M. BIGNELL ETAL. Table 1. Oil yields from Eucalyprus species, Section Exsertaria" Oil yield Species and locality wt% (dry weight) Eucalyptus seeana Maiden 0.37 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. bancroftii (Maiden) Maiden 0.92 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. parramattensis C. Hall 1.02 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. amplifolia Naudin 0.39 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. tereticornis J. Smith 0.62 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. blakelyi Maiden 1.13 Black Mountain, Canberra E dealbura A. Cunn. ex. Schauer 1.77 Wittunga arboretum, South Australia E. dwyeri Maiden & Blakely 2.34 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. vicina L.A.S. Johnson & K.D. Hill 1.19 Manara Hill. New South Wales E. flindersii Boomsma 0.78 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldulensis 0.30 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Blakely 1.50 Ormiston Gorge, Northern Territory E. rudis Endl. 0.73 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. exserra F. Muell. 0.35 Waite arboretum, South Australia E. gillenii Ewert & L.R. Kerr 0.64 Waite arboretum, South Australia The specimens for these species were authenticated by Mr M.I.H. Brooker, Australian National Herbarium or Dean Nicolle, Valley Orchids, South Australia. bancroftii,' E. parramattensis,' E. am lijolia, lo The dry powder was then vacuum distilled so that E. tereticornis,'* '-' E. blakelyi, g-14 E. the leaf oil condensed on to a gold-plated copper dealbata,9"3 E. dwyeri,I2 E. camaldulensis var. rod maintained at approximately -75°C. camaldulen~is,'~~'~*'~E. camaldulensis var. Complete details of this procedure have been obtusa,'* E. rudis' and E. e~serta'"~"~have been published previously.l7 All oils obtained were investigated previously. colourless to pale yellow liquids which floated on water. Table 1 lists the oil yields (wt%, dry weight) for the fifteen species studied. EXPERIMENTAL Analytical gas chromatography (GC) was car- ried out on a Shimadzu GC6 AMP gas chromato- For each species samples of clean, mature leaves graph. A glass SCOT column of SPlOOO (85 m X were picked from over ten positions on a single 0.5 mm) which was programmed from 65°C to tree and, after drying and freezing with liquid 225°C at 3"C/min was used with helium carrier nitrogen, were reduced to a fine powder using a gas. The GC integrations of the peaks were per- stainless steel Waring blender (Model no. SS110). formed on a SMAD electronic integrator. GC VOLATILE LEAF OILS OF EUCALYPTUS SPECIES 37 analyses were also performed with a HP5890 cineole and 997 s for torquatone. Torquatone was Series I1 unit operated in conjunction with a found to be present in almost all oil samples; HP3396 Series I1 integrator. The 'on-column' in- when this was not the case a sufficient amount was jection technique was used with a SGE BP20 added to the oil solution to obtain that reference capillary column of (25 m X 0.33 mm i.d., and point. (A sample of pure torquatone was kindly film thickness 0.5 pm). The carrier gas was hydro- supplied by Dr Emilio Ghisalberti, Chemistry gen with an inlet pressure of 25 kPa: the flow rate Department, University of Western Australia.) was 2.0 cm3/min. The oven was programmed to The normalized retention times of the column rise from 80°C to 220°C at 5"/min, and the inlet were identified with oil components analysed pre- temperature set to 83°C and increased at the same viously by GC-MS for over 75 eucalyptus species: rate as the column. Using these conditions and a many of these results have been published.'-6 2.0 p1 sample of a 0.2% solution of oil in purified All GC analyses were performed in duplicate dry ether essentially all the components were re- and the retention times and percentage composi- corded by the integrator in 31 minutes. GC-MS tions of each component averaged. Duplicate was performed on a VG Quattro mass spec- times were discarded if they differed by more trometer operating at 70 eV ionization energy. than one second. Components which contributed The GC column in this case was a DB-Wax (60 less than 0.06% to the final analyses were not m X 0.32 mm). Compounds were identified by considered (an arbitrary but practical decision). comparison of their GC retention indices to Figure 1 is a typical chromatogram (average areas known compounds and by comparison of their (log scale) versus normalized times) obtained mass spectra either with known compounds or from the oil of an E. camaldulensis var. camaldu- published lensis tree estimated to be over 100 years in age. Only three of the species (E. parrumaftensis,E. rereticornis and E. dwyeri) were analysed with GC-MS. The oil components of the rest were RESULTS AND DISCUSSION identified using normalized retention times. For this purpose the column was calibrated by assum- Freshly isolated oils obtained by vacuum distilla- ing times for three markers, l,&cineole, octa- tion of powdered leaves from single trees were decane (OD added to the ether) and torquatone. analysed by GC-MS and GC. It was necessary to The raw retention times were first normalized to powder the leaves to rupture the oil glands. If 525 s for OD, and times before and after OD unpowdered leaves are used absolutely no oil adjusted by assuming linearity and using 99 s for is obtained. It appears that the membranes 50 I I I I I I] 5c I 0.5 0.05 <v) 0.005 Y 50 K d5 W 0.5 - $ 0.05 - a 300.0 350.0 400.0 450.0 500.0 < 501 1 I 1 I I I( 51 i 0.5 0.05 I I I I I 5- - 0.5 - 0.05 - NORMALISED RETENTION TIMES Fig. 1 Normalized chromatogram (see text) for Eucalyptus curnaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldulensis: areas (log scale) versus normalized retention times in seconds Table 2. Compounds identified and their percentage occurrence (10.05%) in the leaf oils of Eucalyprus species, Section Exsertaria" mW .-e -u u 2 2 -,-A5 $-.9 Ek5 5X P No. Compound di) d 3.99 14.72 0.59 4.76 8.01 1 a-Pinene 4.08 3.98 1.44 4.61 1.51 1.78 2.19 8.74 1.78 12.10 - - 2 a-Fenchene - - - - - - 0.06 - - - - 0.08 - 3 Camphene - 0.10 - - - - - 0.11 - - - 0.08 - 0.22 0.07 4 p-Pinene 0.08 - 0.08 0.16 0.12 0.07 - 3.54 0.20 0.53 0.15 0.21 - 0.77 6.29 5 Sabinene - - - - 0.83 - - - - - - - 0.11 - 6 Myrcene 0.20 - - 0.27 0.28 - - 0.08 - 0.20 0.06 - 0.08 - - - - - - - - 3.40 - 7 a-Phellandrene
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Statement
    SMK CONSULTANTS surveying – irrigation – environmental – planning Wandoona Sand Quarry ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Lot 5 in Deposited Plan 236547 October 2020 The publication of this document has been developed by SMK Consultants. Copyright 2020 by SMK Consultants. All rights reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission. All images and diagrams remain the property of SMK Consultants. SMK CONSULTANTS surveying – irrigation – environmental – planning ABN 63 061 919 003 ii 39 Frome Street PO Box 774 SMK Moree NSW 2400 Ph 02 6752 1021 CONSULTANTS Fax 02 6752 5070 surveying – irrigation – environmental - planning [email protected] ABN 63 061 919 003 Other offices: Goondiwindi, Gatton, Brisbane www.smk.com.au Wandoona Sand Quarry ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Lot 5 in Deposited Plan 236547 Prepared by: SMK Consultants 39 Frome Street, Moree, NSW 2400 October 2020 iii DOCUMENT CONTROL Project Name Wandoona Sand Quarry Proponent Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Project Reference 15-229 Report Number 15-229 – Environmental Impact Statement Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd P.O. Box 941, Moree NSW 2400 Moree NSW 2400 Prepared for Contact: Mitch Johnstone E: [email protected] Ph: 0427 540 212 SMK Consultants Prepared by 39 Frome Street Moree, NSW 2400 Marie Duffy Contact [email protected] 02 6752 1021 Author Marie Duffy Name Marie Duffy BSc. (Hons), MSc. Position Environment & Resource Consultant Company SMK Consultants Reviewed By Name Hayley Greenham BB.
    [Show full text]
  • YELLOW BOX–BLAKELY's RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND Action Plan
    YELLOW BOX–BLAKELY’S RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN PART B 111 PREAMBLE Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland was declared an endangered ecological community on 19 May 1997 (Instrument No. DI1997-89 Nature Conservation Act 1980; Appendix A). Under section 101 of the Nature Conservation Act 2014, the Conservator of Flora and Fauna is responsible for preparing a draft action plan for listed ecological communities. The first action plan for this ecological community was prepared in 1999 (ACT Government 1999). This revised edition supersedes all previous editions. In this action plan, ‘Endangered YB-BRG Woodland’ refers specifically to remnants of the federally listed (EPBC Act 1999) Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland endangered ecological community. Reference to ‘YB-BRG Woodland’ encompasses areas of Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland that may not meet all criteria for listing as an endangered ecological community, but contain critical components of the community, thereby retaining biodiversity values worthy of management action. Measures proposed in this action plan complement those proposed in the action plans for Natural Temperate Grassland, and for component threatened species that occur in Box-Gum woodland: Small Purple Pea (Swainsona recta), Superb Parrot (Polytelis swainsonii), and Tarengo Leek Orchid (Prasophyllum petilum), available at the ACT Government’s Environment website. CONSERVATION CONSERVATION STATUS OBJECTIVES Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland is The overarching goal of this action plan is to conserve declared a threatened ecological community according Endangered Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy to the following legislation: Woodland (hereafter Endangered YB-BRG Woodland) in perpetuity as a viable ecological community across its → National: Environment Protection and Biodiversity geographic range in the ACT.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus Nova-Anglica) Grassy
    Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee on an Amendment to the List of Threatened Ecological Communities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Name of the ecological community New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Grassy Woodlands This advice follows the assessment of two public nominations to list the ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodlands on Sediment on the Northern Tablelands’ and the ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodlands on Basalt on the Northern Tablelands’ as threatened ecological communities under the EPBC Act. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) recommends that the national ecological community be renamed New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Grassy Woodlands. The name reflects the fact that the definition of the ecological community has been expanded to include all grassy woodlands dominated or co-dominated by Eucalyptus nova-anglica (New England Peppermint), in New South Wales and Queensland. Also the occurrence of the ecological community extends beyond the New England Tableland Bioregion, into adjacent areas of the New South Wales North Coast and the Nandewar bioregions. Part of the national ecological community is listed as endangered in New South Wales, as ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodland on Basalts and Sediments in the New England Tableland Bioregion’ (NSW Scientific Committee, 2003); and, as an endangered Regional Ecosystem in Queensland ‘RE 13.3.2 Eucalyptus nova-anglica ± E. dalrympleana subsp. heptantha open-forest or woodland’ (Qld Herbarium, 2009). 2. Public Consultation A technical workshop with experts on the ecological community was held in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland And
    NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Conservation Assessment of White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Mark Tozer and Christopher Simpson 22/06/2020 NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Name: White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Short Name: Box – Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Grassland Distribution: Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and Australian Capital Territory Bioregions: NSW North Coast, New England Tableland, Nandewar, Brigalow Belt South, Sydney Basin, South Eastern Highlands, NSW South Western Slopes Bioregions, South East Queensland and Victorian Midlands Bioregions Current EPBC Act Status: Critically Endangered Current NSW BC Act Status: Endangered Proposed listing on NSW BC Act and EPBC Act: Critically Endangered Summary of Conservation Assessment White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland was found to be eligible for listing as Critically Endangered under Criteria A3 and D3. The main reasons for this Ecological Community being eligible are that it has undergone a very large historical reduction in geographic distribution (since approximately 1750) and has experienced disruption of biotic processes of relative severity >90% over more than 90% of its distribution since 1750. Description White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland comprises an aggregation of Grassy Woodlands (sensu Keith 2004) occurring on the tablelands and western slopes of the Great Diving Range from the Darling Downs in southern Queensland south to central Victoria. In NSW, the community corresponds broadly with Keith’s (2004) Western Slopes Grassy Woodlands, Southern Tableland Grassy Woodlands and New England Grassy Woodlands classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow Box – Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland
    Australian Capital Territory Nature Conservation (Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland) Conservation Advice 2020 Notifiable instrument NI2020–304 made under the Nature Conservation Act 2014, s 90C (Conservation advice) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Nature Conservation (Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland) Conservation Advice 2020. 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after its notification day. 3 Conservation advice for Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland Schedule 1 sets out the conservation advice for the Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland. Arthur Georges Chair, Scientific Committee 22 May 2020 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Schedule 1 (see s 3) Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au CONSERVATION ADVICE YELLOW BOX – BLAKELY’S RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND ELIGIBILITY The ACT Scientific Committee has determined that the ecological community ‘Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland’ is eligible to be transferred to the Critically Endangered category in the ACT Threatened Ecological Communities List under the Nature Conservation Act 2014 (NC Act). It was initially listed in the Endangered category in 1997 (refer to the Listing Background section below). While the community has not necessarily become more threatened in the ACT since the original listing, the transfer to Critically Endangered recognises the ACT’s responsibility at the national level to preserve the nation’s largest and best connected remnants of the community. The threatened Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland in the ACT is encompassed in the ‘White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland’ ecological community listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Wodonga Area Native Plant Lists
    Wodonga Area Native Plant Lists Including Barnawartha, Leneva, Baranduda, Bonegilla, Huon, Ebden About this brochure Order in advance This brochure provides lists of plant species To maximise your range of species, order at that are locally native (indigenous) to the least 12 months in advance. Nurseries can Wodonga area (see back page for map). grow many species if they know you want These species are grouped into lists for them. They can also ensure that the seed is different profiles of the landscape/topography, representing local to your site (plants genetically adapted to your the different vegetation types (Ecological Vegetation Classes, conditions survive the best). So plan and order. If you EVCs) that occur there. The species in bold are those which collect your own seed, this can be given to nurseries to are more common, and underlined species are those that are grow. Then you can be sure of how local your local plants more likely to be available from nurseries that sell indigenous are! A list of nurseries supplying indigenous plants in the NE plants. The lists are cross-referenced with EVC Region can be found in Revegetation Resources Directory, benchmarks (see references). DSE (2005) on the NECMA website: www.necma.vic.gov.au Why restore and revegetate? Choosing the best list for a site These activities provide for: shelter for stock, Selecting the appopriate list will ensure that the pasture or crops; creating/ enhancing the species are suited to the conditions. Consider: habitat for native species; improving water where you are in the landscape/ topography quality; land protection; farm forestry (including (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment Appendices A
    Biodiversity Assessment Rye Park Wind Farm APPENDICES APPENDIX A SPECIES LISTS AND TREE PLOT DATA ................................................................. A-- 1 - A.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................... A‐‐ 1 ‐ A.2 FAUNA .......................................................................................................................................... A‐‐ 8 ‐ A.3 HOLLOW‐BEARING TREE PLOT DATA ......................................................................................... A‐‐ 12 ‐ A.4 BIRD UTILISATION RAW DATA .................................................................................................... A‐‐ 20 ‐ A.5 SUPERB PARROT RAW DATA (TRANSECTS AND FLIGHT PATH MAPPING) ................................. A‐‐ 33 ‐ A.6 MICROBAT RISK ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................... A‐‐ 41 ‐ A.7 THREATENED SPECIES RECORDS ................................................................................................ A‐‐ 44 ‐ APPENDIX B THREATENED SPECIES EVALUATIONS ................................................................ B-- 1 - B.1 FLORA ........................................................................................................................................... B‐‐ 2 ‐ B.2 FAUNA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Max Watson's Vasona Eucalyptus Grove - Legend
    Max Wat~on's Vasona Eucalyptus Grove- Legend Vasona Lake Park, 298 Garden Hill Drive, Los Gatos CA 95030 (408) 358-3741 Original plantings by Max Watson: Nov. 1964, Jan. 1967 & Oct. 1970 Map Revisions by Grace Heintz:June 1983 & Sept. 1986 I Dave Dockter: Feb 1995\ Dockter-Coate: 2005 16 44\\ 44 34 \ . ' 44· ·39 39 39 33 - 13 \ 27 '· .,, , " " , \., "asona Lak·e . o%" / ~,,·,27~ ' u u --· , , "" ",t, . " . / ' · 4,. ""' «.~ ,., ' ' ' - ,,fY' "·"' " ' '· //..i ~ce., ' ·. "• '' .,. '. ' J '/ "· (~ ~ c-43- ~ I 1 28 ~o~ ~ r I /111 '-.' 1 1 " ' ·:--."-• -. - / / I " ''"'"> < I y ~ ..] . ·~ ./~ ..,...-c~1-~\... 9 ~< ' '"' ~ ~ -. - - ~ '• ·' .s:-c/{Le I"·JO' / ; ..... 14 1 I ~>:1.-..' ~-=-·· _../,- :.,---- --_ -;;~Vfo>) t. 7 " ~·/· ~ ..,__ ~( I ' 2 '- '-. " ,. "" ., " u _,.. ~.._ _____...- / ;,P';""""!' -<./ ,;• "' . - •'' I ' . ' ' " AC- " ;;, ;.:r, :::;:.-- -9 39\2~ -..... _;..:::\ ·1 6_:...--- ,..- 6· 3f· ~ -;;... .,,_t' 5~" s~ ----.. ' " .._~ / // ~ ?-. \ " -. ' .. ,,,, ./ 7 1 37 '40 32 ...... __-r~ :;:-24 . 37 .· . ~l l'> ... -:::_,.. -.---.:_32 ___.. 1 1 ~ ~ 31 ~ . 31- ~~~ -0 " V asona Lake County Park, Los Gatos, CA. One of the best public collections of ornamental eucalyptus species in the Bay Area is located at V asona Lake County Park in Los Gatos. Originally planted by local eucalyptus · enthusiast Max Watson in 1964, most of the trees have been identified and labeled Directions and map to the Vasona Lake County Park, Los Gatos. CA as to species. The 40+-year-old trees provide valuable examples of more than 40 different can be accessed online at www.oark.here.org. The entrance to Vasona Lake Park is located at 333 Blossom Hill Road in Los Gatos. Frein southbound eucalyptus species appropriate for both landscape evaluation and botanical study.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Agroforestry Species and Industries for Lower Rainfall Regions of Southeastern Australia FLORASEARCH 1A
    Evaluating agroforestry species and industries for lower rainfall regions of southeastern Australia FLORASEARCH 1A Australia Australia 07-079 Cover CF corrections.indd1 1 14/01/2009 2:12:33 PM Evaluating agroforestry species and industries for lower rainfall regions of southeastern Australia FLORASEARCH 1A Australia A report for the RIRDC / L&WA / FWPA / MDBC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program by Mike Bennell, Trevor J. Hobbs and Mark Ellis January 2009 07-079 Cover CF corrections.indd2 2 14/01/2009 2:12:33 PM © 2008 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 4786 2 ISSN 1140-6845 Please cite this report as: Bennell M, Hobbs TJ and Ellis M (2008). Evaluating agroforestry species and industries for lower rainfall regionss of southeastern Australia: FloraSearch1a. Report to the Joint Venture Agroforestry Program (JVAP) and the Future Farm Industries CRC*. RIRDC, Canberra. Publication No. 07/079 Project No. SAR-38A The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • World Catalogue of Pergidae 9
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE AMERICAN ENTOMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE Volume 34, Number 3 AN ANNOTATED SYSTEMATIC WORLD CATALOGUE OF THE PERGIDAE (HYMENOPTERA) by Stefan Schmidt Zoologische Staatssammlung München Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany and David R. Smith Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture c/o National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution P.O. Box 37012, MRC-168 Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA The American Entomological Institute 3005 SW56th Avenue Gainesville, FL 32608-5047 2006 ISSN: 0569-4450 Copyright © 2006 by The American Entomological Institute Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 FAMILY PERGIDAE ROHWER....................................................................................................... 9 Subfamily Acordulecerinae MacGillivray .................................................................................... 10 Acordulecera Say ................................................................................................................ 10 Acorduloceridea Rohwer .................................................................................................... 25 Anathulea Malaise..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus Cunninghamii and Nothofagus Gunnii
    Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus cunninghamii and Nothofagus gunnii Volume 1 P. Jane Keble-Williams MB.ChB. (University of Sheffield, UK) Grad. Dip. Env. Stud. (University of Tasmania) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania March 2012 ii DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. P.J. Keble-Williams Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. iii iv ABSTRACT The Gondwanan relict tree genus Nothofagus has generated much research due to its biogeographical significance in understanding the biota of the Southern Temperate Zone. However, the southern temperate forest arthropod fauna, including that of Nothofagus, has received less attention than northern temperate forest and tropical rainforest. The extant Tasmanian Nothofagus canopy arthropod fauna has been considered depauparate. Yet with a palaeohistory of long persistence, high diversity and widespread distribution of the genus within Australia, the endemic Tasmanian Nothofagaceae – the evergreen Nothofagus cunninghamii and winter deciduous N. gunnii - could be expected to have accreted a large and diverse arthropod fauna, as have its sister Fagalean families in the northern hemisphere.
    [Show full text]