DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX B Biodiversity Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX B Biodiversity Technical Report APPENDIX B Biodiversity Technical Report PART 1 OF 6 Main Report NORTH STAR TO NSW/QUEENSLAND BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 0 INLAND RAIL Inland Rail North Star to NSW/QLD Border Appendix B – Terrestrial Biodiversity Technical Report Australian Rail Track Corporation Reference: 2700 Document Number: 2-0001-270-EAP-10-RP-0401 Revision: 3 Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Proposal description ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Key proposal features ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Descriptions of key features of the proposal ............................................................. 2 1.1.3 Fencing and signage ................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Operation of the proposal ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Maintenance of the proposal .................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Purpose and scope of this report .............................................................................................. 8 2 Legislative, policy standards and guidelines ................................................................................... 9 2.1 Commonwealth and State legislation ....................................................................................... 9 3 Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Overview of assessment methodologies ................................................................................ 15 3.2.1 Biodiversity Assessment Method............................................................................. 15 3.2.2 Cumulative impact assessment ............................................................................... 19 3.3 Desktop assessment – terrestrial flora and fauna .................................................................. 27 3.3.1 Directory of Important Wetlands .............................................................................. 28 3.3.2 Groundwater dependent ecosystems ...................................................................... 28 3.4 Field assessments – terrestrial flora and fauna ...................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Locations and timing ................................................................................................ 29 3.4.2 Landscape features and context ............................................................................. 47 3.4.3 Native vegetation, threatened ecological communities and vegetation integrity assessment .............................................................................................................. 48 3.4.4 Vegetation integrity assessment (site condition) ..................................................... 49 3.4.5 Threatened ecological community assessment ...................................................... 52 3.4.6 Threatened flora species ......................................................................................... 69 3.4.7 Threatened fauna species ....................................................................................... 69 3.5 Species polygon mapping for threatened species .................................................................. 73 3.6 Permits to conduct works ....................................................................................................... 73 3.7 Quality assurance/quality control............................................................................................ 73 3.8 Nomenclature ......................................................................................................................... 74 3.8.1 Flora ......................................................................................................................... 74 3.8.2 Fauna ....................................................................................................................... 74 3.9 Assumptions and limitations ................................................................................................... 74 4 Description of environmental values............................................................................................... 75 4.1 Desktop assessment results ................................................................................................... 75 4.1.1 Results of terrestrial ecology desktop assessment ................................................. 75 4.1.2 Results of aquatic ecology desktop assessment ..................................................... 79 4.2 Existing environment .............................................................................................................. 80 4.2.1 Flora and fauna........................................................................................................ 81 4.2.2 Native vegetation within the development site ........................................................ 81 4.2.3 Ecosystem – credit species ................................................................................... 100 4.2.4 Species – credit species ........................................................................................ 119 4.2.5 Species credit species exclusions following surveys ............................................ 131 File NS2B_B_Biodiversity-Technical-Report_24AUG-01.docx 4.2.6 Species habitat polygons ....................................................................................... 132 4.2.7 Threatened flora .................................................................................................... 133 4.2.8 Threatened ecological communities ...................................................................... 137 4.2.9 High Threat Exotic flora species ............................................................................ 139 4.2.10 Threatened fauna observed in the study area ....................................................... 140 4.2.11 Pest fauna species ................................................................................................ 141 5 Potential impacts and impact mitigation ...................................................................................... 142 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 142 5.1.1 Proposal activities .................................................................................................. 142 5.2 Nature of impacts ................................................................................................................. 144 5.3 Impact mitigation .................................................................................................................. 153 5.3.1 Avoidance options ................................................................................................. 153 5.3.2 Design considerations ........................................................................................... 153 5.3.3 Mitigation measures .............................................................................................. 154 6 Impact assessment ......................................................................................................................... 160 6.1 Impact assessment under Biodiversity Assessment Methodology ...................................... 160 6.1.1 Impacts not triggering further assessment ............................................................ 160 6.1.2 Plant Community Types and threatened species requiring offset ......................... 160 6.1.3 Paddock tree assessment ..................................................................................... 168 6.1.4 Serious and irreversible impacts ........................................................................... 168 6.2 Prescribed biodiversity impacts ............................................................................................ 176 6.3 Summary of impacts on matters of national environmental significance assessed under Biodiversity Assessment Methodology ................................................................................. 180 6.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 180 6.3.2 Summary of Commonwealth Matters Assessment ............................................... 181 6.4 Key threatening processes ................................................................................................... 182 7 Significant Impact Assessment Methodology outside of the Biodiversity Assessment Method ........................................................................................................................................................... 186 7.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 186 7.1.1 Predictive habitat modelling ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Impact Statement
    SMK CONSULTANTS surveying – irrigation – environmental – planning Wandoona Sand Quarry ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Lot 5 in Deposited Plan 236547 October 2020 The publication of this document has been developed by SMK Consultants. Copyright 2020 by SMK Consultants. All rights reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission. All images and diagrams remain the property of SMK Consultants. SMK CONSULTANTS surveying – irrigation – environmental – planning ABN 63 061 919 003 ii 39 Frome Street PO Box 774 SMK Moree NSW 2400 Ph 02 6752 1021 CONSULTANTS Fax 02 6752 5070 surveying – irrigation – environmental - planning [email protected] ABN 63 061 919 003 Other offices: Goondiwindi, Gatton, Brisbane www.smk.com.au Wandoona Sand Quarry ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Lot 5 in Deposited Plan 236547 Prepared by: SMK Consultants 39 Frome Street, Moree, NSW 2400 October 2020 iii DOCUMENT CONTROL Project Name Wandoona Sand Quarry Proponent Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd Project Reference 15-229 Report Number 15-229 – Environmental Impact Statement Johnstone Concrete and Quarries Pty Ltd P.O. Box 941, Moree NSW 2400 Moree NSW 2400 Prepared for Contact: Mitch Johnstone E: [email protected] Ph: 0427 540 212 SMK Consultants Prepared by 39 Frome Street Moree, NSW 2400 Marie Duffy Contact [email protected] 02 6752 1021 Author Marie Duffy Name Marie Duffy BSc. (Hons), MSc. Position Environment & Resource Consultant Company SMK Consultants Reviewed By Name Hayley Greenham BB.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pharmacological and Therapeutic Importance of Eucalyptus Species Grown in Iraq
    IOSR Journal Of Pharmacy www.iosrphr.org (e)-ISSN: 2250-3013, (p)-ISSN: 2319-4219 Volume 7, Issue 3 Version.1 (March 2017), PP. 72-91 The pharmacological and therapeutic importance of Eucalyptus species grown in Iraq Prof Dr Ali Esmail Al-Snafi Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Thi qar University, Iraq Abstract:- Eucalyptus species grown in Iraq were included Eucalyptus bicolor (Syn: Eucalyptus largiflorens), Eucalyptus griffithsii, Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Syn: Eucalyptus rostrata) Eucalyptus incrassate, Eucalyptus torquata and Eucalyptus microtheca (Syn: Eucalyptus coolabahs). Eucalypts contained volatile oils which occurred in many parts of the plant, depending on the species, but in the leaves that oils were most plentiful. The main constituent of the volatile oil derived from fresh leaves of Eucalyptus species was 1,8-cineole. The reported content of 1,8-cineole varies for 54-95%. The most common constituents co-occurring with 1,8- cineole were limonene, α-terpineol, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, globulol and α , β and ϒ-eudesmol, and aromatic constituents. The pharmacological studies revealed that Eucalypts possessed gastrointestinal, antiinflammatory, analgesic, antidiabetic, antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, antiparasitic, insecticidal, repellent, oral and dental, dermatological, nasal and many other effects. The current review highlights the chemical constituents and pharmacological and therapeutic activities of Eucalyptus species grown in Iraq. Keywords: Eucalyptus species, constituents, pharmacological, therapeutic I. INTRODUCTION: In the last few decades there has been an exponential growth in the field of herbal medicine. It is getting popularized in developing and developed countries owing to its natural origin and lesser side effects. Plants are a valuable source of a wide range of secondary metabolites, which are used as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, flavours, fragrances, colours, biopesticides and food additives [1-50].
    [Show full text]
  • YELLOW BOX–BLAKELY's RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND Action Plan
    YELLOW BOX–BLAKELY’S RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN PART B 111 PREAMBLE Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland was declared an endangered ecological community on 19 May 1997 (Instrument No. DI1997-89 Nature Conservation Act 1980; Appendix A). Under section 101 of the Nature Conservation Act 2014, the Conservator of Flora and Fauna is responsible for preparing a draft action plan for listed ecological communities. The first action plan for this ecological community was prepared in 1999 (ACT Government 1999). This revised edition supersedes all previous editions. In this action plan, ‘Endangered YB-BRG Woodland’ refers specifically to remnants of the federally listed (EPBC Act 1999) Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland endangered ecological community. Reference to ‘YB-BRG Woodland’ encompasses areas of Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland that may not meet all criteria for listing as an endangered ecological community, but contain critical components of the community, thereby retaining biodiversity values worthy of management action. Measures proposed in this action plan complement those proposed in the action plans for Natural Temperate Grassland, and for component threatened species that occur in Box-Gum woodland: Small Purple Pea (Swainsona recta), Superb Parrot (Polytelis swainsonii), and Tarengo Leek Orchid (Prasophyllum petilum), available at the ACT Government’s Environment website. CONSERVATION CONSERVATION STATUS OBJECTIVES Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland is The overarching goal of this action plan is to conserve declared a threatened ecological community according Endangered Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy to the following legislation: Woodland (hereafter Endangered YB-BRG Woodland) in perpetuity as a viable ecological community across its → National: Environment Protection and Biodiversity geographic range in the ACT.
    [Show full text]
  • AFSS 2014 Abstract Booklet
    Oral abstracts Oral abstracts The evolution of ASFB – reflections on 35 years of membership Seeing with sound – the behaviour and movements of fish in estuaries 1 2 1 2 01 Martin Gomon1 04 Alistair Becker , Iain M Suthers , Alan K Whitfield 1. Museum Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa The Australian Society for Fish Biology had as its inception early meetings organised by the ichthyological staff of the Australian Museum and New South Fisheries intended as a mechanism for sharing advances in fish related science and the development of Underwater video techniques have progressed rapidly over the past ten years, and are now used in a diverse range of habitats initiatives leading to the better understanding of the diversity and biology of Australia’s ichthyofauna. Although the enthusiasm from small creeks to the ocean depths. A limitation of underwater video cameras is they rely on high levels of water clarity and and casual nature of this now incorporated body has remained, the various focuses of the Society and its annual conferences have require artificial lighting if used in low light conditions. In systems such as estuaries, turbidity levels often restrict the use of changed over the decades in line with the evolving directions of the institutions and authorities charged with addressing fish conventional video. Acoustic cameras (DIDSON) overcome this problem as they rely on sound to produce near video, flowing studies and management, as well as the transient influences of the many characters that have been the Society’s driving force.
    [Show full text]
  • Volatile Leaf Oils of Some South-Western and Southern Australian Species of the Genus Eucalyptus. Part VII. Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Exsertaria
    FLAVOUR AND FRAGRANCE JOURNAL, VOL. 11,35-41(1996) Volatile Leaf Oils of some South-western and Southern Australian Species of the Genus Eucalyptus. Part VII. Subgenus Symphyomyrtus, Section Exsertaria C. M. Bignell and P. J. Dunlop Department of Chemistry, University of Adelaide, South Australia, SM5, Australia J. J. Brophy Department of Organic Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 20S2, Australia J. F. Jackson Department of Viticulture, Oenology and Horticulture, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia The volatile leaf oils of Eucalyptus seeana Maiden, E. bancrofrii (Maiden) Maiden, E. parramattensis C. Hall, E. amplifolia Naudin, E. tereticornis J. Smith, E. blakelyi Maiden, E. dealbata A. Cunn. ex. Schauer, E. dwyeri Maiden & Blakely, E. vicina L. A. S. Johnson & K. D. Hill, E. flindersii Boomsma, E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var camaldulensis, E. camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Blakely, E. rudis Endl., E. exserta F. Muell. and E. gillenii Ewart & L. R. Kerr, isolated by vacuum distillation, were analysed by GC-MS. Most species contained a-pinene (1.5-14%), 1,&cineole (0-81%), p-cymene (O.6-28%) and aromadendrene/terpinen-4-01 (0.6-24%) as principal leaf oil components. KEY WORDS Eucalyptus seeana Maiden; Eucalyptus bancrofrii (Maiden) Maiden; Eucalyptus parramattensis C. Hall; Eucalyptus amplifolia Naudin; Eucalyptus tereticornis J. Smith; Eucalyptus blakelyi Maiden; Eucalyptus dealbata A. Cunn. ex. Schauer; Eucalyptus dwyeri Maiden & Blakely; Eucalyptus vicina L. A. S. Johnson & K. D. Hill; Eucalyptusflindersii Boomsma; Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. var. camaldulensis; Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. var. obtusa Blakely; Eucalyptus rudis Endl.; Eucalyptus exserta F. Muell.; Eucalyptus gillenii Ewart & L.
    [Show full text]
  • New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus Nova-Anglica) Grassy
    Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee on an Amendment to the List of Threatened Ecological Communities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Name of the ecological community New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Grassy Woodlands This advice follows the assessment of two public nominations to list the ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodlands on Sediment on the Northern Tablelands’ and the ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodlands on Basalt on the Northern Tablelands’ as threatened ecological communities under the EPBC Act. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) recommends that the national ecological community be renamed New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Grassy Woodlands. The name reflects the fact that the definition of the ecological community has been expanded to include all grassy woodlands dominated or co-dominated by Eucalyptus nova-anglica (New England Peppermint), in New South Wales and Queensland. Also the occurrence of the ecological community extends beyond the New England Tableland Bioregion, into adjacent areas of the New South Wales North Coast and the Nandewar bioregions. Part of the national ecological community is listed as endangered in New South Wales, as ‘New England Peppermint (Eucalyptus nova-anglica) Woodland on Basalts and Sediments in the New England Tableland Bioregion’ (NSW Scientific Committee, 2003); and, as an endangered Regional Ecosystem in Queensland ‘RE 13.3.2 Eucalyptus nova-anglica ± E. dalrympleana subsp. heptantha open-forest or woodland’ (Qld Herbarium, 2009). 2. Public Consultation A technical workshop with experts on the ecological community was held in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • White Box Yellow Box Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland And
    NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Conservation Assessment of White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Mark Tozer and Christopher Simpson 22/06/2020 NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Name: White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland Short Name: Box – Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Grassland Distribution: Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and Australian Capital Territory Bioregions: NSW North Coast, New England Tableland, Nandewar, Brigalow Belt South, Sydney Basin, South Eastern Highlands, NSW South Western Slopes Bioregions, South East Queensland and Victorian Midlands Bioregions Current EPBC Act Status: Critically Endangered Current NSW BC Act Status: Endangered Proposed listing on NSW BC Act and EPBC Act: Critically Endangered Summary of Conservation Assessment White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland was found to be eligible for listing as Critically Endangered under Criteria A3 and D3. The main reasons for this Ecological Community being eligible are that it has undergone a very large historical reduction in geographic distribution (since approximately 1750) and has experienced disruption of biotic processes of relative severity >90% over more than 90% of its distribution since 1750. Description White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland comprises an aggregation of Grassy Woodlands (sensu Keith 2004) occurring on the tablelands and western slopes of the Great Diving Range from the Darling Downs in southern Queensland south to central Victoria. In NSW, the community corresponds broadly with Keith’s (2004) Western Slopes Grassy Woodlands, Southern Tableland Grassy Woodlands and New England Grassy Woodlands classes.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentos De Botânica
    KLS Título da unidade 1 FUNDAMENTOS DE BOTÂNICA FUNDAMENTOS Nome do autor Fundamentos de Botânica Fundamentos de Botânica Ana Claudia Bensuaski de Paula Zurron © 2018 por Editora e Distribuidora Educacional S.A. Todos os direitos reservados. Nenhuma parte desta publicação poderá ser reproduzida ou transmitida de qualquer modo ou por qualquer outro meio, eletrônico ou mecânico, incluindo fotocópia, gravação ou qualquer outro tipo de sistema de armazenamento e transmissão de informação, sem prévia autorização, por escrito, da Editora e Distribuidora Educacional S.A. Presidente Rodrigo Galindo Vice-Presidente Acadêmico de Graduação Mário Ghio Júnior Conselho Acadêmico Ana Lucia Jankovic Barduchi Camila Cardoso Rotella Danielly Nunes Andrade Noé Grasiele Aparecida Lourenço Isabel Cristina Chagas Barbin Lidiane Cristina Vivaldini Olo Thatiane Cristina dos Santos de Carvalho Ribeiro Revisão Técnica Sônia Aparecida Santiago Editorial Camila Cardoso Rotella (Diretora) Lidiane Cristina Vivaldini Olo (Gerente) Elmir Carvalho da Silva (Coordenador) Letícia Bento Pieroni (Coordenadora) Renata Jéssica Galdino (Coordenadora) Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Zurron, Ana Claudia Bensuaski de Paula Z96f Fundamentos de botânica / Ana Claudia Bensuaski de Paula Zurron. – Londrina : Editora e Distribuidora Educacional S.A., 2018. 208 p. ISBN 978-85-522-0552-4 1. Botânica. I. Título. CDD 581 Thamiris Mantovani CRB-8/9491 2018 Editora e Distribuidora Educacional S.A. Avenida Paris, 675 – Parque Residencial João Piza CEP: 86041-100 — Londrina
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Box (Eucalyptus Microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia
    Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia: A guide to the identification, assessment and management of a nationally threatened ecological community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Glossary the Glossary at the back of this publication. © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercialised use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Public Affairs - Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2610 Australia or email [email protected] Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and is valid as at June 2012. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. CONTENTS WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE? 1 NATIONALLY THREATENED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES 2 What is a nationally threatened ecological community? 2 Why does the Australian Government list threatened ecological communities? 2 Why list the Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of South-Eastern Australia as
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow Box – Blakely's Red Gum Grassy Woodland
    Australian Capital Territory Nature Conservation (Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland) Conservation Advice 2020 Notifiable instrument NI2020–304 made under the Nature Conservation Act 2014, s 90C (Conservation advice) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Nature Conservation (Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland) Conservation Advice 2020. 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after its notification day. 3 Conservation advice for Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland Schedule 1 sets out the conservation advice for the Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland. Arthur Georges Chair, Scientific Committee 22 May 2020 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Schedule 1 (see s 3) Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au CONSERVATION ADVICE YELLOW BOX – BLAKELY’S RED GUM GRASSY WOODLAND ELIGIBILITY The ACT Scientific Committee has determined that the ecological community ‘Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland’ is eligible to be transferred to the Critically Endangered category in the ACT Threatened Ecological Communities List under the Nature Conservation Act 2014 (NC Act). It was initially listed in the Endangered category in 1997 (refer to the Listing Background section below). While the community has not necessarily become more threatened in the ACT since the original listing, the transfer to Critically Endangered recognises the ACT’s responsibility at the national level to preserve the nation’s largest and best connected remnants of the community. The threatened Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland in the ACT is encompassed in the ‘White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland’ ecological community listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act).
    [Show full text]