DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This research was conducted and the report was prepared by the Centre for Civil Integration and Inter-Ethnic Relations (CCIIR). The research was conducted in the framework of the Promotion of Integration, Tolerance and Awareness (PITA) Program funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG). The views and opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the USAID and the UNAG. 2 Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia Research Report Authors: Shalva Tabatadze Natia Gorgadze Kakha Gabunia 3 Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia ISBN: 978-9941-8-2238-4 ©Center for Civil Integration and Inter-Ethnic Relations Tbilisi 2020 4 Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER I. OVERVIEW OF AFFIRMATIVE AVTION POLICY IN GEORGIA’S HIGHER EDUCATION .............................. 7 CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 10 RESEARCH OBJECTIVE AND QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 10 RESEARCH METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 10 1) SURVEY OF 12TH GRADERS IN NON-GEORGIAN SCHOOLS ………………………………………………………………………………………12 2) SURVEY OF THE STUDENTS IN THE ONE-YEAR GEORGIAN LANGUAGE PROGRAM ……………………………………………….………..16 3) FOCUS GROUPS WITH BACHELOR’S STUDENTS ENROLLED THROUGH THE QUOTA SYSTEM………………………………………………..16 4) FOCUS GROUPS WITH UNIVERSITY GRADUATES ENROLLED THROUGH THE QUOTA SYSTEM ……………………………………………….16 5) INTERVIEWS WITH PROGRAM HEADS AND TEACHERS ………………………………………………………………………………………..…..17 6) DESK RESEARCH…………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………..17 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS …………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………..………..18 CHAPTER 3 ELABORATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF THE ONE-YEAR GEORGIAN LANGUAGE PROGRAM BETWEEN 2010-2019 ........................................................................................................................................... 19 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 4 OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE QUOTA SYSTEM IN 2010-2019 ............................................................................................................................. 26 STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY HEI. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 STUDENT DISTRIBUTION ACROSS THE PROGRAMS ………………………………………………………………….………………………………..30 LOW GRADUATION RATES ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………….…..34 GRANT ALLOCATION PATTERNS AND RELATED INEQUITIES ………………………………………………………………….………………….…..34 ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL SKILLS EXAM ………………………………………….………………………………………….…..35 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 5. SURVEY OF 12TH GRADERS: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………..… .38 5.1. STUDENTS’ PREPAREDNESS IN LANGUAGE AND SUBJECT COMPETENCIES AND SOCIAL SKILLS ................................................ 38 5.2. POST-GRADUATION PLANS...................................................................................................................................... 39 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER 6. EVALUATION OF THE ONE-YEAR GEORGIAN LANGUAGE PROGRAM’S EFFECTIVENESS: RESULTS AND CHALLENGES …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 45 6.1. SURVEY PARTICIPANTS’ DEMOGRAPHICS ................................................................................................................... 45 6.2. THE STUDENTS’ ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGRAM’S EFFECTIVENESS OVERALL..................................................................... 46 6.3. TEACHING METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 48 6.4. EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................. 56 6.5. USE OF TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET PLATFORMS ........................................................................................................ 57 6.6. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................... 59 6.7. STUDENTS’ ASSESSMENT OF THE PROGRAM BY HEI ..................................................................................................... 59 6.8. STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES/GENDER DIFFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 67 6.9. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS: COMPARISON OF CURRENT AND PREVIOUS SURVEY RESULTS ............... 67 6.10. COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF 2013 AND 2020 STUDIES ............................................................................................ 68 6.11. COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS FROM 2016 – 2020 ................................................................................................ 70 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 72 Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia CHAPTER 7. STUDENTS’ PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES IN UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES ........................................74 7.1. SPECIFIC REASONS FOR HIGH DROPOUT RATES OF STUDENTS ENROLLED THROUGH THE QUOTA SYSTEM .............................. 74 7.2. UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC, SOCIAL, AND CIVIC INTEGRATION ....................................................... 76 7.3. RESEARCH ON THE PROBLEMS THAT ETHNIC MINORITIES IN GEORGIAN HEI FACE................................................ 79. CHAPTER 8. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE QUOTA SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF GRADUATES’ EMPOWERMENT AND INTEGRATION ……………………………….…………………………………………………………….………84 CHAPTER 9. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METHODS TO IMPROVE POLICY …….…………….…………………………………90 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................................... 97 TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................. 99 FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................................. 100 Study of the Higher Education Minority Quota System Policy in Georgia Acknowledgements This research is the first attempt to summarize the higher education minority affirmative action policy introduced in 2009. The study explored 10 years' experience with the policy and its success stories and identified its problems and challenges as well. This document is an important resource for analysis, revision, and improvement of the policy on national minorities. This research is a result of the valuable input and efforts of its authors, as well as many other individuals involved. It would have been impossible to carry out the research without their commitment and motivation. Therefore, we would like to express our great appreciation to all of them. First, we would like to extend our thanks to The United Nations Association of Georgia, which gave us the opportunity to carry out this research as part of the USAID-funded project Promotion of Integration, Tolerance and Awareness (PITA) in Georgia. We would like as well to acknowledge the enormous support the staff members of our organization, Elene Jajanidze, and Tamar Antadze, provided at every stage of the study's implementation. We offer our thanks also to the students who conducted the fieldwork and collected all of the data. We extend our special thanks to the heads of the One Year Georgian Language Programs at each university involved. Together with them, we would like to thank the teachers and students of these universities for their time and collaboration, and for sharing their honest answers and interesting ideas. We are grateful as well to the non- Georgian school administrations for their support in conducting the survey research. We believe that the issues the research raised will be addressed appropriately by the policymakers, as well as the management of the university faculties and heads of the programs. Implementation of the recommendations provided in
Recommended publications
  • Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs

    Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs

    Subgenus Lasius Fabricius, 1804 53. L. (Lasius) alienus (Foerster, 1850) Distribution: E.G.: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Bursachili, Gardabani, Grakali, Gudauri, Gveleti, Igoeti, Iraga, Kasristskali, Kavtiskhevi, Kazbegi, Kazreti, Khrami gorge, Kianeti, Kitsnisi, Kojori, Kvishkheti, Lagodekhi Reserve, Larsi, Lekistskali gorge, Luri, Manglisi, Mleta, Mtskheta, Nichbisi, Pantishara, Pasanauri, Poladauri, Saguramo, Sakavre, Samshvilde, Satskhenhesi, Shavimta, Shulaveri, Sighnaghi, Taribana, Tbilisi (Mushtaidi Garden, Tbilisi Botanical Garden), Tetritskaro, Tkemlovani, Tkviavi, Udabno, Zedazeni (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1964a, b, 1966, 1967b, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Abasha, Ajishesi, Akhali Atoni, Anaklia, Anaria, Baghdati, Batumi Botanical Garden, Bichvinta Reserve, Bjineti, Chakvi, Chaladidi, Chakvistskali, Eshera, Grigoreti, Ingiri, Inkiti Lake, Kakhaberi, Khobi, Kobuleti, Kutaisi, Lidzava, Menji, Nakalakebi, Natanebi, Ochamchire, Oni, Poti, Senaki, Sokhumi, Sviri, Tsaishi, Tsalenjikha, Tsesi, Zestaponi, Zugdidi Botanical Garden (Ruzsky, 1905; Karavaiev, 1926; Jijilashvili, 1974b); S.G.: Abastumani, Akhalkalaki, Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Avralo, Bakuriani, Bogdanovka, Borjomi, Dmanisi, Goderdzi Pass, Gogasheni, Kariani, Khanchali Lake, Ota, Paravani Lake, Sapara, Tabatskuri, Trialeti, Tsalka, Zekari Pass (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1967a, 1974a). 54. L. (Lasius) brunneus (Latreille, 1798) Distribution: E.G.: Bolnisi, Gardabani, Kianeti, Kiketi, Manglisi, Pasanauri (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Akhali Atoni, Baghdati,
  • The Public Defender of Georgia

    The Public Defender of Georgia

    200 6 The Public Defender of Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 1 Human Rights in Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 2006Second half of TBILISI 2007 THE REPORT WAS PUBLISHED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY AND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (UNDP) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 9 2. THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL 11 3. THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE 24 4. THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS 41 5. FISCAL POLICE 55 6. HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMED FORCES 57 7. ALTERNATIVE LABOUR SERVICE 60 8. ALTERNATIVE LABOUR SERVICE IN THE RESERVE 64 9. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM 65 10. DEATH RATE WITHIN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM AND CAUSATIVE FACTORS 82 11. ENFORCEMENT OF COURT JUDGEMENTS 87 12. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGEMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 94 13. INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP 97 14. PROTECTION OF THE ELDERLY, AND PENSIONS 118 15. REPORT ON THE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONFLICT ZONES 130 16. INCIDENTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN ABKHAZIA 132 17. INSTANCES OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IN TSKHINVALI REGION 142 18. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED 148 19. THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF REFUGEES 167 20. REPATRIATION ISSUES RELATED TO THE EXILE OF THE POPULATION FROM THE SOUTH OF GEORGIA BY THE SOVIET REGIME IN THE 1940S 173 21. DISCRIMINATION OF ETHNIC GEORGIANS BY THE RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES 177 22. ASSISTANCE BY THE GEORGIAN AUTHORITIES TO THE DEPORTED PERSONS FROM THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 183 23. GEORGIAN CITIZEN PRISONERS AT THE DETENTION FACILITIES ABROAD 190 24. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATION 191 25.
  • Annexation of Georgia in Russian Empire

    Annexation of Georgia in Russian Empire

    1 George Anchabadze HISTORY OF GEORGIA SHORT SKETCH Caucasian House TBILISI 2005 2 George Anchabadze. History of Georgia. Short sketch Above-mentioned work is a research-popular sketch. There are key moments of the history of country since ancient times until the present moment. While working on the sketch the author based on the historical sources of Georgia and the research works of Georgian scientists (including himself). The work is focused on a wide circle of the readers. გიორგი ანჩაბაძე. საქართველოს ისტორია. მოკლე ნარკვევი წინამდებარე ნაშრომი წარმოადგენს საქართველოს ისტორიის სამეცნიერ-პოპულარულ ნარკვევს. მასში მოკლედაა გადმოცემული ქვეყნის ისტორიის ძირითადი მომენტები უძველესი ხანიდან ჩვენს დრომდე. ნარკვევზე მუშაობისას ავტორი ეყრდნობოდა საქართველოს ისტორიის წყაროებსა და ქართველ მეცნიერთა (მათ შორის საკუთარ) გამოკვლევებს. ნაშრომი განკუთვნილია მკითხველთა ფართო წრისათვის. ISBN99928-71-59-8 © George Anchabadze, 2005 © გიორგი ანჩაბაძე, 2005 3 Early Ancient Georgia (till the end of the IV cen. B.C.) Existence of ancient human being on Georgian territory is confirmed from the early stages of anthropogenesis. Nearby Dmanisi valley (80 km south-west of Tbilisi) the remnants of homo erectus are found, age of them is about 1,8 million years old. At present it is the oldest trace in Euro-Asia. Later on the Stone Age a man took the whole territory of Georgia. Former settlements of Ashel period (400–100 thousand years ago) are discovered as on the coast of the Black Sea as in the regions within highland Georgia. Approximately 6–7 thousands years ago people on the territory of Georgia began to use as the instruments not only the stone but the metals as well.
  • Development Perspectives of the XXI Century

    Development Perspectives of the XXI Century

    Caucasus University Friedrich Ebert Foundation International Students’ Scientific Conference Development perspectives of the XXI century Georgia, 8-11 May, 2009 UDC 330/34(479) (063) s-249 D-49 krebulSi ganTavsebulia samecniero naSromebi, SerCeuli meore saerTaSoriso studenturi samecniero konferenciisaTvis `21-e saukune _ ganviTarebis perspeq- tivebi~, romlis umTavresi mizania studentTa dasabuTebuli Tvalsazrisis warmoCena TavianTi qveynebis ganviTarebis perspeqtivaze. agreTve erTiani xedvis SemuSaveba msoflios winaSe mdgari problemebis gadawyvetis Taobaze. The collection contains works of the Second International Student’s Scientific Conference “Development Perspectives of the XXI century”. The major goal of the conference is to present reasonable arguments from the students of the countries of Europe and South Caucasus on European integration opportunities. Here also one can find the initiative on forming entire vision for solving key problems, facing Europe and South Caucasus. gamomcemeli: kavkasiis universiteti _ fridrix ebertis fondis mxardaWeriT Published by Caucasus University, with the support of Friedrich Ebert Foundation saredaqcio kolegia: Salva maWavariani (Tavmjdomare), indrek iakobsoni, giorgi RaRaniZe, londa esaZe, lia CaxunaSvili, naTia amilaxvari, dina oniani, naTia narsaviZe. Ed. board: Shalva Machavariani (head), Indrek Jakobson, Giorgi Gaganidze, Londa Esadze, Lia Chakhunashvili, Natia Amilakhvari, Dina Oniani, Natia Narsavidze. ISSN 1987-5703 Tbilisi, 2008 Contents 1. Ana Kostava The self-determination principle and
  • Geological Hazards in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region (Georgia)

    Geological Hazards in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region (Georgia)

    International Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 7, 311-324 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.73024 Geological Hazards in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region (Georgia) Gaprindashvili George1,2, Gerkeuli Tamaz1, Tsereteli Emil1,2, Gaprindashvili Merab1 1Department of Geology, National Environmental Agency, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Received 17 February 2016; accepted 19 March 2016; published 22 March 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Hundreds of settlements, agricultural lands, roads, oil and gas pipelines’ routes, towers of high voltage transmission lines, hydro-technical-meliorative objects, mountain resorts, etc. are period- ically experiencing strong influence of landslide-gravitational and debris flow/mudflow processes (often with catastrophic results). Almost all landscape-geographic zones—from Black Sea coastal region, to mountainous-nival, where geo-ecological situation is severely complicated, are located in dangerous area of disaster. Negative social-economic, demographic and ecological consequences caused by debris flow/mudflows and landslide-gravitational processes, are seen in all spheres of human activity. In mountainous regions there is especially complicated situation, where in condi- tions of extreme activation of disaster, in many cases population displacement and transfer to other regions is needed. Because of it, in second half of 20th century, tens of villages in mountain- ous regions were desolated and agricultural lands were abandoned.
  • Ideologia Da Lingvisturi Ideebi IDEOLOGY and LINGUISTIC IDEAS

    Ideologia Da Lingvisturi Ideebi IDEOLOGY and LINGUISTIC IDEAS

    ggiorgiiorgi aaxvledianisxvledianis ssaxelobisaxelobis eenaTmecnierebisnaTmecnierebis iistoriisstoriis ssazogadoebaazogadoeba iivanevane jjavaxiSvilisavaxiSvilis ssaxelobisaxelobis TTbilisisbilisis ssaxelmwifoaxelmwifo uuniversitetiniversiteti ssaerTaSorisoaerTaSoriso kkonferenciaonferencia iideologiadeologia ddaa llingvisturiingvisturi iideebideebi IINTERNATIONALNTERNATIONAL CONFERENCECONFERENCE IIDEOLOGYDEOLOGY AANDND LLINGUISTICINGUISTIC IDEASIDEAS 6-9 ooqtomberi,qtomberi, 22017017 / OOCTOBERCTOBER 66-9,-9, 22017017 pprogramarograma ddaa TTezisebisezisebis kkrebulirebuli PProgramrogram aandnd AAbstractsbstracts TTbilisibilisi 22017017 gamomcemloba grifoni giorgi axvledianis saxelobis enaTmecnierebis istoriis sazogadoeba ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti saerTaSoriso konferencia ideologia da lingvisturi ideebi 6-9 oqtomberi, 2017, Tbilisi, saqarTvelo programa da Tezisebis krebuli TTbilisibilisi 22017017 GIORGI AKHVLEDIANI SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF LINGUISTICS IVANE JAVAKHISHVILI TBILISI STATE UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IDEOLOGY AND LINGUISTIC IDEAS 6-9 OCTOBER, 2017, TBILISI, GEORGIA Program and Abstracts Tbilisi 2017 saredaqcio sabWo TinaTin bolqvaZe (ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universiteti, giorgi axvledianis saxelobis enaTmecnierebis istoriis sazogadoeba, Tbilisi, saqarTvelo) patrik serio (peterburgis universiteti, ruseTi/ lozanis universiteti, Sveicaria) kamiel hamansi (adam mickeviCis universiteti, poznani, poloneTi) TinaTin margalitaZe (ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis
  • Kenneth D. Walsh, Ph.D. Dean, SDSU-Georgia

    Kenneth D. Walsh, Ph.D. Dean, SDSU-Georgia

    SDSU 031-04-15 April 15, 2015 MaGda MaGradze Chief Executive Officer Millennium ChallenGe Account – GeorGia 52 Uznadze Street 0102 Tbilisi, GeorGia Dear Ms. MaGradze, Please find enclosed herewith the documents for the Quarter 3 Report for the Provision of DeGree Accreditation and Institutional Support Initiative for Science, TechnoloGy, EnGineerinG, and Mathematics, as required per the contract dated July 28, 2014. The specific documents attached include: • Report on Execution of Q3 Work Plan and Q4 Plan Updates (note, this merGes two separate deliverables per the list in AGreement, for better narrative flow) • Status Report on EnGlish/Stem Institute • Report on GeorGian faculty traininG at SDSU • Discussion of articulation plan proGress • DesiGn ProGress Report for New Construction packaGes Per the terms of the aGreement, please provide review comments within 10 business days. An invoice for the associated payment amount will accompany the revised version once comments are incorporated. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kenneth D. Walsh, Ph.D. Dean, SDSU-Georgia San Diego State University Address: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 1 Ilia Chavchavadze Avenue, Building 2, Room 101 Tbilisi 0179, Georgia Office: +995 32 229 08 20 Mobile: +995-558-174-414 Email: [email protected] THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY· BAKERSFIELD· CHICO· DOMNIGUEZ HILLS· FRESNO· FULLERTON· HAYWARD· HUMBOLDT· LONG BEACH· LOS ANGELES· MARITIME ACADEMY MONTEREY BAY · NORTHRIDGE · POMONA · SACRAMENTO · SAN BERNARDINO · SAN DIEGO · SAN FRANCISCO · SAN JOSE · SAN LUIS OBISPO · SAN MARCOS · SONOMA · STANISLAUS 1 Annex 1 – Report on Execution of Q3 Work Plan and Q4 Plan Updates The rest of this page is left intentionally blank.
  • Urban Development in Georgia

    Urban Development in Georgia

    Key facts and figures relating to housing and urban development in Georgia Nino Gventsadze Head of spatial planning department Ministry of regional development and infrastructure of Georgia Housing in Georgia Current conditions Housing in Georgia is characterized with long and deep systematic crisis which are caused by the following reasons: non- existent policy, non-sufficient legislative base and non-adequate institutional set-up. Georgian government still doesn’t have a well-defined, clear policy in the field of Housing, also not a single office directly governs and works on Housing issues neither on legislation or enforcement level. Estimated future plan in Housing • To define short, medium and long term priorities Short term priority – should focus on how to fix homelessness, clearly define the terminology, exact identification of beneficiary groups and setting criteria for people who will receive the support, launching an institution, drafting legislation etc. Medium and long term - should focus on large number of people who will be able to afford the Housing (affordable Housing), provide an adequate Housing, improve policy making in regard of construction and urban development, solving demographic issues in the country etc. Improvements In 2018, Government of Georgia has taken a duty in implementing a “Housing policy documentation and strategic plan”, for that reason in 2019, April a special committee was established who will define a strategic plan. So far consultations are taking place. It is planned to make an amendments in legislation (In Georgian legislation there is the only law, which is dedicated to housing and needs a great deal of revise and improvement) The Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories and Refugees of Georgia has realized several projects: • Ministry purchased 300 accommodations from the Chinese company “Hualing” • Throughout the country, ministry purchased several accommodations from developers, reconstructed, built new constructions etc.
  • 96 25 June 2017

    96 25 June 2017

    No. 96 25 June 2017 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html TRANSBORDER TRADE Special Editors: Philippe Rudaz and Susanne Fehlings ■■The Chinese Connection—Informal Trade Relations between the Caucasus and China Since the Early 1990s 2 By Susanne Fehlings (Goethe University Frankfurt) ■■Moscow Azerbaijani-Juhuro “Oligarchs” and the Eurasian Trade Networks 5 By Chen Bram (Truman Institute, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) ■■Suddenly a Border: Hazelnut Trade across the De Facto Border between Abkhazia and the Zugdidi Municipal Region of Georgia 9 By Ketevan Khutsishvili (Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University) Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 96, 25 June 2017 2 The Chinese Connection—Informal Trade Relations between the Caucasus and China Since the Early 1990s By Susanne Fehlings (Goethe University Frankfurt) Abstract This article surveys informal trade between the Caucasus and China since the early 1990s. Starting with the initial commercial activities of singular entrepreneurs from the Caucasus—here taken to refer to Arme- nia and Georgia—who began travelling to China for purposes of trade immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I move to current business relations between Caucasian businessmen and women and their Chinese partners and to the growing influence of Chinese entrepreneurs who come to the Caucasus for trade. Introduction ing large-scale companies, and individual entrepreneurs This article offers a survey of informal transnational and local traders, similarly adapt to local business envi- trade between the Caucasus—specifically Armenia and ronments and political frameworks.
  • Saint Grigol Peradze Grigol Peradze 900Th Anniversary 900Th

    Saint Grigol Peradze Grigol Peradze 900Th Anniversary 900Th

    იიივანეივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახსახსახელობისსახ ელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი ისტორიისა დადადა ეთნოლოგიის ინსტიტუტი IIIvaneIvane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Institute ofofof History andandand Ethnology ვარშავის უნივერსიტეტი აღმოსავლეთ ევროპისმცოდნეობის ცენტრი University of Warsaw Centre for East European Studies საქართველოს მეცნიერებათა ეროვნული აკადემია Georgian National Academy of Sciences წმიდა მღვდელმოწამე გრიგოლ ფერაძის საზოგადოება Society ofofof Saint Archimandrite Grigol Peradze SSSaintSaint Grigol Peradze 2nd International Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 900th Anniversary of the Battle of Didgori Tbilisi, Georgia September 20 – 21, 2021 First Circular Grigol Peradze is a great Georgian scholar canonized by the Georgian Orthodox Chur ch as a saint martyr . Still very young, he was forced to leave Georgia (to avoid the Bolshevik regime) and found refuge in Europe. While abroad, Grigol Peradze began an active scientific research, he searched everywhere and collected Georgian manuscripts a nd studied them. After a divine vision, he gave up secular life and became a monk. Unfortunately, the totalitarian regime did not allow him to live in peace even in Europe. When Nazi Germany occupied Poland, he was there. Grigol Peradze as a foreigner coul d leave the country, but he did not. He did not cooperate with the Nazis and tried to protect Jews from Nazi repressions. Therefore, he was soon confined in a concentration camp and ended his life in a gas chamber. According to the statement, St. Grigol Pe radze entered the cell instead of one Jew who had many children in order to save human life and not to bow to evil. In 2019 the Georgian society celebrated the 120th anniversary of this great Georgian figure.
  • Wikivoyage Georgia.Pdf

    Wikivoyage Georgia.Pdf

    WikiVoyage Georgia March 2016 Contents 1 Georgia (country) 1 1.1 Regions ................................................ 1 1.2 Cities ................................................. 1 1.3 Other destinations ........................................... 1 1.4 Understand .............................................. 2 1.4.1 People ............................................. 3 1.5 Get in ................................................. 3 1.5.1 Visas ............................................. 3 1.5.2 By plane ............................................ 4 1.5.3 By bus ............................................. 4 1.5.4 By minibus .......................................... 4 1.5.5 By car ............................................. 4 1.5.6 By train ............................................ 5 1.5.7 By boat ............................................ 5 1.6 Get around ............................................... 5 1.6.1 Taxi .............................................. 5 1.6.2 Minibus ............................................ 5 1.6.3 By train ............................................ 5 1.6.4 By bike ............................................ 5 1.6.5 City Bus ............................................ 5 1.6.6 Mountain Travel ....................................... 6 1.7 Talk .................................................. 6 1.8 See ................................................... 6 1.9 Do ................................................... 7 1.10 Buy .................................................. 7 1.10.1
  • Protection of Cultural Heritage on Occupied Territories (Online, 24-25 Jun 21)

    Protection of Cultural Heritage on Occupied Territories (Online, 24-25 Jun 21)

    Protection of Cultural Heritage on Occupied Territories (online, 24-25 Jun 21) online / Tbilisi, Georgia, Jul 24–25, 2021 Chubinashvili Centre International Conference Protection of Cultural Heritage on Occupied Territories: Georgia and International Experience Organizers: The George Chubinashvili National Research Centre for Georgian Art History and Heri- tage Preservation; Korneli Kekelidze Georgian National Centre of Manuscripts and Ivane Javakhishvili Institute of History and Ethnology at Tbilisi State University Partners: Georgian National Committee of the Blue Shield; Shota Rustaveli National Science Foun- dation of Georgia The aim of the conference is to bring together scholars and researchers who are interested in the protection of endangered cultural heritage and are ready to share their experiences of difficulties and challenges that exist in this field. This type of event is intended to create a real precondition for greater public awareness; About the rights and opportunities for international support in such similar difficult circumstances regarding the protection and preservation of tangible and intangible cultural heritage in the occu- pied territories; Take specific steps and outline possible action plans with international partners. -- PROGRAM JUNE 24, 2021 13:00-13:45 Opening of the Conference Tamar Belashvili, Director of the George Chubinashvili National Research Centre for Georgian Art History and Heritage Preservation Welcoming Address Thea Tsulukiani, Minister of Culture, Sports and Youth of Georgia Mikheil Chkhenkeli,