DOCSLIB.ORG

DATA COLLECTION STANDARDS 2012 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DATA COLLECTION STANDARDS 2012 edition created by the program partners of the ATLANTIC COASTAL COOPERATIVE STATISTICS PROGRAM NOAA Fisheries Service | US Fish and Wildlife Service | Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | New England Fishery Management Council | Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council | Potomac River Fisheries Commission | South Atlantic Fishery Management Council | Maine Department of Marine Resources | New Hampshire Fish and Game Department | Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries | Rhode Island Division of Fish and Wildlife | Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection | New York State Department of Environmental Conservation | New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife | Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife | Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission | District of Columbia Fisheries and Wildlife | Maryland Department of Natural Resources | Virginia Marine Resources Commission | North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries | South Carolina Department of Natural Resources | Georgia Department of Natural Resources | Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Atlantic Coast Fisheries Data Collection Standards TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 OVERVIEW A. MISSION 3 B. PROGRAM PARTNERS 4 C. BACKGROUND 5 D. PROGRAM SCOPE 9 E. PROGRAM STRUCTURE 10 F. PUBLIC INPUT 13 G. OUTREACH 14 H. PROGRAM PROCEDURES 15 I. LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT 16 DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT STANDARDS A. DATA MODULES 18 B. DATA LOADS 20 C. CONFIDENTIALITY 21 D. BENCHMARKING 24 E. QUALITY ASSURANCE 25 CATCH AND EFFORT STATISTICS STANDARDS A. COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 27 B.RECREATIONAL FISHERIES (Private boat, rental boat, and shore based fisheries) 37 C. FOR-HIRE FISHERIES 46 D. PERMIT AND VESSEL REGISTRATION DATA 55 E. METADATA 62 BIOLOGICAL DATA A. STANDARDS 64 B. SAMPLING PRIORITIZATION 67 C. MEASUREMENT STANDARDS 69 D. DATA ELEMENTS 74 E. DATA SUBMISSIONS 79 F. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL 80 G. TARGET MONITORING 81 H. PROGRAM RESEARCH AND IMPROVEMENT 82 I. REGIONAL PROCESSING CENTERS 83 BYCATCH, RELEASES, AND PROTECTED SPECIES INTERACTIONS DATA A. STANDARDS 85 B. SAMPLING PRIORITIZATION 89 C. MINIMUM DATA ELEMENTS 90 D. DATA SUBMISSIONS 107 E. VALIDATION 108 F. QUALITY ASSUARANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL 109 G. SUBSAMPLING 110 H. TARGET MONITORING 111 I. PROGRAM RESEARCH AND IMPROVEMENT 112 SOCIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DATA A. COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 114 B. RECREATIONAL AND FOR-HIRE FISHERIES 121 Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program | www.accsp.org Atlantic Coast Fisheries Data Collection Standards TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS A1 GLOSSARY A2 APPENDIX A: Committee Participation Guidelines A8 APPENDIX B: Staff Positions, Descriptions, & Organizational Chart A9 APPENDIX C: Codes & Format A11 APPENDIX D: Maps of Areas Fished A77 APPENDIX E: Commercial Quality Assurance & Quality Control Procedures A86 APPENDIX F: Recreational Quality Assurance & Quality Control Procedures A96 APPENDIX G: Biological Matrix Summary A126 APPENDIX H: Bycatch Matrix Summary A127 APPENDIX I: Standard Measurement for Gear Type/Gear Elements A128 APPENDIX J: Marine Mammal Stranding Form (Level A Data) A155 APPENDIX K: Sea Turtle Stranding & Salvage Network Report Form A157 APPENDIX L: Social & Economic Data Considerations A158 Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program | www.accsp.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Atlantic Coast Fisheries Data Collection Standards: A third edition of the program design for the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program defines policies, data collection and data management standards for the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program (hereinafter, the ACCSP or the Program). This document also provides direction on future improvements for Atlantic coast commercial, recreational, and for-hire fisheries statistics. In this third edition of the program design, significant updates have been made to recreational catch and effort data collection standards. These standards not only reflect the current data needs identified by the partners (as compiled by the Recreational Technical Committee), but also provide guidance to the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) of NOAA Fisheries Service. These standards support the continued use of innovative technologies and state performance of intercept sampling. The partners recognize that full implementation of some standards is a long-term goal, and components will be incorporated commensurable with available resources. References to most specific programs have been removed to allow for changes to methodologies over time. The program design is updated to provide long-term guidance for implementing programs and providing accurate and timely fisheries-dependent data in support of state and federal fisheries conservation and management activities. 1 OVERVIEW The Atlantic Coast Fisheries Data Collection Standards provides detailed information on standards, policies, reporting requirements, quality control and assurance documentation, and processes necessary for adjustments and modification. This document should be implemented by all partners as fully as possible to ensure effective and consistent implementation of data collection and data management models. Supporting documentation for all Program details are provided on the web1.This includes information on technical, advisory, and public input into all final decisions of the ACCSP as well as a history of discussion and approval actions. The Program is committed to transparency in all its operations and therefore programmatic documents are always made available through the ACCSP website. 1 All supporting documentation for ACCSP can be found by visiting www.accsp.org. 2 A. MISSION The mission of the ACCSP is to be a “cooperative state-federal program to design, implement, and conduct marine fisheries statistics data collection programs and to integrate those data into a single data management system that will meet the needs of fishery managers, scientists, and fishermen.” 3 B. PROGRAM PARTNERS The ACCSP is a state-federal partnership composed of 23 entities, including: Federal Agencies NOAA Fisheries Service US Fish and Wildlife Service Councils and Commissions Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission New England Fishery Management Council Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Potomac River Fisheries Commission South Atlantic Fishery Management Council State Agencies Maine Dept. of Marine Resources New Hampshire Fish and Game Dept. Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Rhode Island Division of Fish and Wildlife Connecticut Dept. of Energy and Environmental Protection New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission District of Columbia Fisheries and Wildlife Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources Virginia Marine Resources Commission North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries South Carolina Dept. of Natural Resources Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 4 C. BACKGROUND The Program was established in 1995 through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to address deficiencies in the data that constrained fisheries management along the Atlantic coast. These deficiencies included incompatibilities between state and federal data systems, a lack of standardized trip level catch and effort reporting by partners, the lack of universal permit and vessel registration data, and a general need for more and better data to support new emerging fisheries management initiatives. The Program established four basic principles to ensure that fisheries- dependent statistics are complete, accurate, consistent, and compatible: 1. Cooperative development and implementation across jurisdictional lines 2. Coastwide data collection standards and a single, integrated data management system 3. Data on all fishing activities (e.g., commercial, recreational, and for-hire fisheries) 4. Modular design for data collection and data management projects Beginning In the mid-to-late 1990s, after the Program officially began, funding from partner contributions from the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act (ACFCMA) supported the establishment of committees to develop the first edition of the program design. The committees also created minimum standards and operating procedures. In addition, the funds supported salary for one staff member. The committees included a variety of technical committees, an advisory committee, a steering committee (named the Operations Committee), and a policy level committee (named the Coordinating Council). The minimum standards that the committees were instructed to develop were based on needs for fisheries stock assessments and management. The committees were also instructed to question current practices, not necessarily preserve the status quo, and were asked to give little weight to possible cost implications. New minimum standards included 1) the type and resolution of data that should be collected, 2) minimum data elements with standard codes, 3) timeliness, and 4) quality control and assurance practices. Partners agreed to meet all minimum standards, given the needed resources, and were free to exceed the standards when needed. For example, partners may require additional data elements or tighter reporting deadlines. Partners may also continue using their own coding systems, as long as data can be mapped directly to the ACCSP standard codes. 5 Partnerships Established By 1999, much of the planning was complete and standards
Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E

    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
  • Feeding Ecology of Dolphinfish in the Western Gulf of Mexico

    Feeding Ecology of Dolphinfish in the Western Gulf of Mexico

    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145:839–853, 2016 © American Fisheries Society 2016 ISSN: 0002-8487 print / 1548-8659 online DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2016.1159614 ARTICLE Feeding Ecology of Dolphinfish in the Western Gulf of Mexico Rachel A. Brewton Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, USA Matthew J. Ajemian Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, 5600 U.S. Highway 1 North, Fort Pierce, Florida 34946, USA Peter C. Young and Gregory W. Stunz* Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, USA Abstract Dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus support important commercial and recreational fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. Understanding the feeding ecology of this economically important pelagic fish is key to its sustainable management; however, dietary data from this region are sparse. We conducted a comprehensive diet study to develop new trophic baselines and investigate potential ontogenetic and sex-related shifts in Dolphinfish feeding ecology. The stomach contents of 357 Dolphinfish (27.6–148.5 cm TL) were visually examined from fishery-dependent sources off Port Aransas, Texas. Our analyses revealed a highly piscivorous diet with Actinopterygii comprising 70.44% of the stomach contents by number. The most commonly observed taxa were carangid (12.45%N) and tetraodontiform (12.08%N; families Balistidae, Monacanthidae, and Tetraodontidae) fishes. Malacostracans were also common (24.83%N), mostly in the form of pelagic megalopae. Other prey categories included squid and the critically endangered Kemp’s Ridley sea turtles Lepidochelys kempii.
  • East Coast of North America Groundfish: Initial Explorations of Biogeography and Species Assemblages

    East Coast of North America Groundfish: Initial Explorations of Biogeography and Species Assemblages

    East Coast of North America Strategic Assessment Project Partitioning the Total Mortality DFO r~I'j~ffm~niii~rlieqUe 10020258 of Atlantic Cod Stocks Project East Coast of North America Groundfish: Initial Explorations of Biogeography and Species Assemblages o Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA SH 213.5 August 1996 .E17 1996 c.2 About the East Coast of North America Strategic Assessment Project The East Coast of North America Strategic Assessment Project (ECNASAP) was initiated in the USA by NOAA's Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA) Division to develop information and analytical resources for sup­ porting integrated management of large portions of the region's coastal ocean. The ECNASAP Pilot Project consists of inshore and offshore case studies, and is a cooperative effort among several U.S. and Canadian agencies. Digital map and data products are being developed in the Offshore Case Study for groundfish, seabirds, temperature, salinity, and sediments. This report summarizes the initial results for the groundfish component. About Partitioning the Total Mortality of Atlantic Cod Stocks Project In 1995, Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) initiated a series of research projects to address high priority issues for the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. The Cod Mortality Project is a component of this effort; its objective is to assess the main causes for the decline of cod resources since the mid-1980s. A subproject is to examine long-term changes in groundfish assemblages on a biogeographic scale, and to determine whether or not these changes coincided with changes in ocean climate.
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume

    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
  • New Records of Epibionts from Loggerhead Sea Turtles Caretta Caretla (L.)

    New Records of Epibionts from Loggerhead Sea Turtles Caretta Caretla (L.)

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. 70(31: 953-956.2002 NEW RECORDS OF EPIBIONTS FROM LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES CARETTA CARETLA (L.) Michael G. Frick, Kristina L. Williams and David C. Veljacic Epibiosis is a highly valuable strategy for the survival of small, sedentary and sessile organisms living in the estuarine environment, where sandy and muddy bottom habitats are common and hard substrata are generally scarce (Olabama, 2000). Since loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta (L.), frequently occupy estuarine habitats adjacent to rookery beaches in between nesting events, a variety of non-obligate estuarine forms occur as epibionts on nesting turtles (Frazier et al., 1985; Dodd, 1988; Frazier et al., 1991, 1992; Frick et al., 1998, 2000a,b). We sampled a total of 99 loggerheads nesting on Wassaw Island (3 1'53 'N, 80'50 W) and Jekyll Island (3 1 O4N, 8 1'25 'W), Georgia for epibionts during the 1998 and 2000 nesting seasons from May-August using protocols outlined in Frick et al, (1998). Here, we document the occurrence of five previously unreported epibiont species from C. caretta (Table 1). The newly documented epibiont species reported in this study are also commonly ob- served within the coastal region of Georgia as free-living forms or as commensals of other estuarine residents. Thus, the associations presented herein do not appear to be obligate. However, since little is known of the life history of these epibiotic species when occumng in Georgia and nothing is known of their life history as epibionts of C. caretta, several characteristics of the newly reported epibiota are worthy of discussion.
  • 109 Annotated Checklist Of

    109 Annotated Checklist Of

    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2010 Supplement No. 23: 109–129 Date of Publication: 31 Oct.2010 © National University of Singapore ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF ANOMURAN DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS OF THE WORLD (EXCLUSIVE OF THE KIWAOIDEA AND FAMILIES CHIROSTYLIDAE AND GALATHEIDAE OF THE GALATHEOIDEA) PART II – PORCELLANIDAE Masayuki Osawa Research Center for Coastal Lagoon and Environments, Shimane University, 1060 Nishikawatsu-cho, Matsue, Shimane 690-8504, Japan Email: [email protected] Patsy A. McLaughlin Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1900 Shannon Point Road, Anacortes, WA 98221-4042, USA Email: hermit@fi dalgo.net INTRODUCTION Porcellanidae Haworth, 1825 = Porcellaniens H. Milne Edwards, 1837 Ng et al. (2008) and McLaughlin et al. (this volume) referred = Porcellaniadae Randall, 1840 to the “windows” to the literature and the “springboards” for = Porcellanodea Henderson 1888 associating species with their scientifi c names that provided = Porcellainea Holmes, 1900 the foundations for subsequent brachyuran, paguroid and lithodoid research. For the porcellanids, one treatise in particular has provided a similar base upon which virtually all DESCRIPTIVE TERMS AND CURRENT STATUS subsequent porcellanid reports have been patterned. Despite its regional focus, Haig’s (1960) monograph of eastern General morphology. – The general body shape is crab- Pacifi c species included 87 of the 225 species estimated to like and the carapace is well calcifi ed. Regions of the dorsal be present worldwide at the time (Chace, 1951). During the integument are not usually well defi ned. The anterior margin last half century the number of genera has increased from of the carapace is produced into a short rostrum or rostral 14 prior to Haig’s (1960) monograph to 30 and the number lobe.
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Diet Studies of Fish of the Southeast United States and Gray’S Reef National Marine Sanctuary

    An Annotated Bibliography of Diet Studies of Fish of the Southeast United States and Gray’S Reef National Marine Sanctuary

    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series MSD-05-2 An annotated bibliography of diet studies of fish of the southeast United States and Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary U.S. Department of Commerce February 2005 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Marine Sanctuaries Division About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Sanctuary Division (MSD) administers the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
  • Large-Scale Spatial and Temporal Variability of Larval Fish Assemblages in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean

    Large-Scale Spatial and Temporal Variability of Larval Fish Assemblages in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean

    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2019) 91(1): e20170567 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170567 www.scielo.br/aabc | www.fb.com/aabcjournal Large-Scale Spatial and Temporal Variability of Larval Fish Assemblages in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean CHRISTIANE S. DE SOUZA and PAULO O. MAFALDA JUNIOR Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Biologia, Laboratório de Plâncton, Rua Ademar de Barros, s/n, Ondina, 40210-020 Salvador, BA, Brazil Manuscript received on July 28, 2017; accepted for publication on April 30, 2018 How to cite: SOUZA CS AND JUNIOR POM. 2019. Large-Scale Spatial and Temporal Variability of Larval Fish Assemblages in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. An Acad Bras Cienc 91: e20170567. DOI 10.1590/0001- 3765201820170567. Abstract: This study investigated the large-scale spatial and temporal variability of larval fish assemblages in the west tropical Atlantic Ocean. The sampling was performed during four expeditions. Identification resulted in 100 taxa (64 families, 19 orders and 17 suborders). During the four periods, 80% of the total larvae taken represented eight characteristics families (Scombridae, Carangidae, Paralepididae, Bothidae, Gonostomatidae, Scaridae, Gobiidae and Myctophidae). Fish larvae showed a rather heterogeneous distribution with density at each station ranging from 0.5 to 2000 larvae per 100m3. A general trend was observed, lower densities at oceanic area and higher densities in the seamounts and islands. A gradient in temperature, salinity, phytoplankton biomass, zooplankton biomass and station depth was strongly correlated with changes in ichthyoplankton structure. Myctophidae, and Paralepididae presented increased abundance at high salinities and temperatures.
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And

    A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And

    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.