~n $2.00 a Copy.··$ i(I.CO/yeaHI' (Canada s~5/yeal")·-31~6-31541-4!41S;2.; Website: www.DearJiaul"gmuSocietY,(()ll"g
The 29th Annual DBS Conference will Dean Burgon wrote: "Next to "D," the You must get a copy of the entire 10 be held at Bible Brethren Church in most untrustworthy codex is Aleph, which messages of the Chicago DBS meeting. It is Hagerstown, MiDIon July li8-19, 2007, bears on itsfront a memorable note of the evil on either DVD (#3310DVI-Z) or VHS Pastor Paul Reno and his church will be repute under which it has always la- (#33HlVCI-Z) @ $25 + $5 S&lH!) for either hosting the meeting, They will be serving boured:--viz. it is found that at least ten format. These are powerful messages! lunch and an evening meal during the revisers between the l Vth and the Xllth conference, A nursery will be available for An Important Book centuries busied themselves with the task of ages birth to 3 years for the evening session on Dr. Moorman's important work, 8,000 correcting its many and extraordinary th Thursday, July 18 , and plans are being made DifferencesBetween the NT Greek Words of perversions of the truth of Scripture. II [Dean for youth meetings (age 8-15) to be held . the King James Bible and the Modern John W. Burgon, Revision Revised, p. 13]. 'ing the adult sessions on both days, Versions, is now available as a joint effort of 6. The Depravity of Mall'llllJ~ A block of rooms has been set aside at a the DBS and Bible For Today. No translator, scripts ··4Ueph:" "8;" and "D."· near-by Super 8 Motel for a nightly rate of pastor, or teacher should be without this book. Dean Burgon wrote: "We venture to $60.88 which includes a continental breakfast. It is #3084 @ $20 + $5S&H. assure him, without a particle of hesitation, There are hair driers, microwaves, refriger- The following article by Dr. Waite is a that "Aleph," "B," "D" are three of the most ators, and coffee makers in the rooms, The continuation of the first part which was in scandalously. corrupt copies extant=exhibit phone number: 3IH ..582~1992; address: 16805 DBSN #78, The article was too large for one the most shamefully mutilated texts which are make Road, Hagerstown, MD, 21740. Use edition. anywhere to be met witht=have become, by Map Quest and/or the DBS website for maps, whatever process (for their history is wholly .The nearby airports are Washington/Dulles Westcott unknown), the depositories of the largest (lAD) or Baltimore/Washington (BWI). amount of fabricated readings ancient Commuter flights are available into blunders, and intentional perversions of Hagerstown. There are many historical sites in Tnuh=-which are discoverable in any known the area for the families. A list will be copies of the Word of God. " [Dean John W. provided by the church. Burgon, Revision Revised, p. 16]. Dean Burgon knew what these old ancient Uncials fFire$ide~~t1:@if ftlhl®[!llBl~ were. They were depraved, and mutilated. Dr. Phil Stringer, Pastor, and the Rav .. From OBSN Edition Yet these are respected, revered, and put on a enswood Baptist Church in Chicago hosted a pedestal today. special and well-attended DBS meeting in Chicago, March 5-6, 2007. There were eight speakers and two panel discussions IN Dean Burgon wrote: I1:lliJ® G~®mq '1I®011:0aIi'lTIl~Njj]\t©C:i:ITi\l@ \JWu\1:GlIDml "Between the first two (B and Aleph) there DEFENSE OF TRADITIONAL BIBLE \~llB@ ~Uu'8)t~ l]@@ W®GJlns fJl\l'~®lf subsists an amount of sinister resemblance, TEXTS. The theme of this meeting was "The 'fJ.JJ®rI® r;¥ih~J«2®" which proves that they must have been derived Received! Texll: ll
Again, this is not sufficient evidence to attention. We venture to think his method to worship, is it not? favor HOS or "who." It is unreasonable to irrational." [Dean John W. Burgon, Revision 7. The Errors of the Last have the modem versions favoring it, yet they Revised, pp. 242-43]. Three false Textual Theories. 4. The False Textual "GOD was manifest in the flesh" is the Dean Burgon wrote: "Strange,' we Theory of the Frenchman Tregel- correct reading in the King James Bible. venture to exclaim, (addressing the living Though it is entirely in error, HOS is what is les. representatives of the school of Lachmann, used in the new versions and perversions of Dean Burgon wrote: "Tregelles adopted and Tregelles, and Tischendorf):-: 'Strange, our day. Here are a few of them: the same strange method. He resorted to a that you should not perceive that you are the "HE WHO was manifested in the vety few out of the entire mass of 'ancient dupes of afallacy which is even transparent. flesh"--the American Standard Version. Authorities' for the construction of his Text. You talk of "Antiquity." But you must know "HE was manifested in the flesh"--the His proceeding is exactly that of a man, very well that you actually mean something Revised Standard Version. who=in order that he may the better explore different. You fasten upon three, or perhaps "HE WHO was revealed in the a comparatively unknown region=begins by four--on two, or perhaps three=on one, or flesh"--New American Standard Version. putting out both his eyes; and resolutely perhaps two=-documents of the IVth or Vth "HE appeared in a body"--the New refuses the help of the natives to show him the century. But then, confessedly, these are one, International Version. way. Why he rejected the testimony of every two, three, or four specimens only of "HE was shown to us in a human Father of the IVth century except Eusebius.i-it Antiquity=-not "Antiquity" itself. And what if body"--the New Century Version. were unprofitable to enquire." [Dean John W. they should even prove to be unfair samples of "HE was revealed in flesh"--the New Burgon, Revision Revised, p. 243]. Dean Antiquity? ... '" [Dean John W. Burgon, Revised Standard Version. Burgon's humor and picturesque figures of Revision Revised, p. 244]. speech add to his clear logic of argumentation. 8. The Errors In Dr. Han"s 2. The Error of "Altemam S. The False Textual Theory five Readings." Dean Burgon wrote: False New Testament Textual "What are found in the margin are therefore of German Tlschenciori' {'IS31 Theory. Dean Burgon wrote: "... Dr. 'alternative readings--in the opinion of these .A.D.}. Hort informs us that Lachmann 's Text of 1831 self-constituted representatives of the Church Tischendorf was the man that found the was 'the first founded on documentary and of the Sects. It becomes evident that by Sinai manuscript in the wastebasket on Mt. authority. ' ... On what then, pray, does the this ill-advised proceeding, our Revisionists Sinai. The monks were getting ready to bum learned Professor imagine that the Texts of would convert every Englishman's copy of the it and Tischendorfwas getting ready to buy it. Erasmus (1516) and of Stunica (1522) were . "w Testament into a one-sided Introduction Which one, do you think, had the correct founded: His statement is incorrect. The ~ .he Critical difficulties of the Greek Text; a appreciation of the value of the Sinai actual difference between Lachmann's Text labyrinth, out of which they have not been at manuscript? Ithink it was the monks! Dean and those of the earlier Editors is that his the pains to supply him with a single hint as to Burgon wrote: "Tischendorf, the last and by 'documentary authority' is partial, narrow, how he may find his way.... 'Whatelse must far the ablest of the three, knew better than to self-contradictory; and is proved to be be the result of all this but general reject 'eighty-nine ninetieth' of the extant untrustworthy by afree appeal to Antiquity." uncertainty, confusion, distress? A hazy witnesses. He had recourse to the ingenious ... "Their documentary authority, derived mistrust of all Scripture has been insinuated expedient of adducing all the available from independent sources,--though partial into the hearts and minds of countless evidence, but adopting just as little of it as he and narrow as that on which Lachmann millions, who in this way have been forced to chose; and he chose to adopt those readings relied=exhibits (under the good Providence become doubters, --yea, doubters in the Truth ' only, which are vouchedfor by the same little of God,) a Traditional Text, the general purity
of Revelation itself" [Dean John W. Burgon, band of authorities whose partial testimony I of which is demonstrated by all the evidence Revision Revised, pp. 236-237]. Dean Burgon had already proved fatal to the decrees of which 350 years of subsequent research have is opposed to alternative readings. These are Lachmann and Tregelles." [Dean John W. succeeded in accumulating; and which is what abound in the footnotes of the study Burgon, Revision Revised, p. 243]. confessedly the Text of A.D. 375." [Dean John edition of the New King James Version. The $. TIli1~f1i\1~~\il T~ld~<'l'A~1J1li1~@Il'!i~~ W. Burgon, Revision Revised, p. 250]. What reader doesn't know which to believe, the he is trying to say is that the opposite of the words of the text or the words of the Westcott and Hort text is a traditional text ©1li1®&lld~'!Hflf ~i1.mlTlTIl!'i'i'n:!ijlil"rn:!1~,!~L footnotes! This results in a "hazv mistrust of which has been the text of A.D. 375. This is, Dean Burgon wrote: "Enough has been all Scripture"! ' of course, what Westcott and Hort have said to show=tthe only point we are bent on :33. iJlIilC!'il ~Cill~®® clr®~~rJ.!]~illlrllil®rn agreed, but they have a false theory to explain establishing)--that the one distinctive tenet of ; it. @1Rj' @ff f([iiJ® @@li"ii'ull@ml the three most famous Critics since 1831 has I \ffJ" 'if1li1~ Uml ~@1l:frTI "~r.rilti:fj'Gmlc Dean Burgon wrote: "Lachmann's ruling been a superstitious rev.erencefor whatever is i principle then, was exclusive reliance 011 a found in the same little handful of early, --but 1l31© ~IT'@[@ [Dean John 'vV. Revision pp. 251 . a baseless and interest would leave "Intrinsic probability" refers to what the imagination.s-a dream and nothing more." history. As a conjecture-sand it only original might have been. With their mind the [Dean John W, Burgon, Revision Revised, pp. professes to be a conjecturer-Dr. Hort's textual critics try to figure out what might ' 258-262]. Here is what Westcott and Hort ! notion of how the Text of the Fathers of the have been there in the original text. mean by conflation. You might take :\ car and Illrd, IVth, and Vth centuries.s-which, as he "Transcriptional probability" refers to what a van someplace. In writing about this, you truly remarks, is in the main identical with our changes the scribe might have made to the might have one manuscript that reads "car" own Received Text=came into being, must be document. Both forms of "probability" are and another manuscript that reads "van." i unconditionally abandoned." [Dean John W. evil and pure guesswork! Then you have a manuscript that combines the Burgon, Revision Revised, pp. 293-94]. A '1l@o TIlil® IEfi'l1'@l1'f) UI1il j!il'!J® two of them and reads "car and van." "recension" of the Greek New Testament Text "~®[j'i}®@l~@\B.lill~(DB [};l:Ju@l®I1il~®O" Westcott and Hort alleged that this is what the ! would mean that this text was fabricated by ~rr®®1';: , Textus Receptus did in the preceding eight !I editors. The editor would throw out all the Dean Burgon wrote: "High time I examples. They said there were two parts to i other contrary texts, and come up with just however is it to declare that, in strictness, all some texts, one part from HE" and ~ There not a scrap of tjy' this talk about evidence' when their "true" text, and another from some i about this event. This is a fa. to Manuscripts is moonshine .... But other manuscript, claimed that the Ii had to account for the fact then, it happens, unfortunately, that we are Textus Receptus took both parts and added II the Textus Receptus-type manuscripts have unacquainted with one single instance of a ! them together. This is what Westcott and Hort i over 99% of the manuscript evidence behind known MS copied from another known MS. called "conflation." If"conflation" were true I it. Westcott and Hort had to say that someone And perforce all talk about 'Genealogical to fact, wouldn't they be able to produce more 'I made an editorial recension or revision of the evidence, ' where no single step in the descent than eight examples of it? Yet Westcott and New Testament. They then said that all of the can be produced=-in other words, where no Hort couldn't find any more than eight, and Textus Receptus-type manuscripts were car- Genealogical evidence exists=-is absurd." only three have any possible hope of being I bon copies of that original recension or [Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised, pp. proper examples. revision. This is their false, flawed, and 255-56]. 13. The fai!!ll/9 so~CO'l.ln~do.$:W[f~ unhistorical hypothesis to account for 99% of Genealogy in documents refers to those ialm T@l1l:t ReC8!1!l!!llH@II'Il"'@j'f :rgS)@ @lti'tl(l)], the evidence. that are clearly related, one to the other just sse ~"tQl. fNI.~ifMf!e~" 1]s, trB~@ aIITi!ltJll@[[\l:81l!'ilQ~® @iI' ~®~ like a relation might exist between a father, a Westcott and Hort wrote: "The Syrian son, a grandson and so on. Yet that is one of Text [our Textus Receptus 1 must infact be the @if 1:.f({7®~\~~@)'~1);(Dlnl@ lXl©n'1£" the errors that Westcott and Hort made up. It result of a 'Recension,' . . . performed Dean Burgon wrote: "We have been so is this false genealogy argument which is used deliberately by Editors, and not merely by fit/Ion the subject of this imaginary by the so-called Majority Greek text for John Scribes." (Introduction, p. 133). Dean Burgon 'Antiochian' or 'Syrian text,' not (the reader 7 :53--8: 11, and the entire book of Revelation. answered them as follows: "But why 'must' may be sure) without sufficient reason. Scant '11"~m 'lIiil@B iElfll"@li"$ rrill Url® S@~ it? Instead of 'must infact,' we are disposed satisfaction truly is there in scattering to the Cag!®@i'ij 'D«:BliefrMlllal@!l!Jiil:~~ ~wh;Il~II'IlIC®ov to read 'may-sin fiction.' The learned Critic winds an airy tissue which its ingenious mM$itlri!!liilOd" can but mean that, on comparing the Text of authors have been industriously weaving for Dean Burgon wrote: "The living Fathers of the IVth century with the Text of 30 years; But it is clear that with this inhabitants of a village, congregated in the cod. B, it becomes to himself self-evident that hypothesis of a 'Syrian' text=the immediate churchyard where the bodies of their one of the two has been fabricated. Granted. source and actual prototype of the commonly forgotten progenitors for 1000 years repose Then,«-Why should not the solitary Codex be received Text of the N. T,--stands orfalls the' without memorials of any kind, [In other the offending party? ... why (we ask) should entire Textual theory. Reject it, and , words, there are no gravestones in this codex B be upheld 'contra mundum'?" entire fabric is observed to collapse, ana cemetery.j=is a faint image of the relation [Against the whole world] [Dean John W. subside into a shapeless ruin. And with it, of necessity, goes the 'New Greek Text, '--and about A.D. 350,--an authoritative standard all to be ruthlessly sacrificed=-the tribunal therefore the 'New English Version' of our Text was fabricated at Antioch; of which all from which there shall be absolutely no Revisionists, which in the main has been other known MSS. (except a very little appeal=-the Oracle which is to silence every 'ounded on it." [Dean John W. Burgon, handful) are nothing else but transcripts,' but doubt, resolve every riddle, smooth away ~i.evision Revised, p. 294]. Westcott and Hort's rather, by loyally recognizing, in the practical every difficulty. All has been stated, where whole house of cards will fall if their identity of the Text exhibited by 99 out of 100 the nam,e has been pronounced of--codex B. " extant lI/{'SS, the Revision Revised, p. no historical record that the element of ever the picture of this false will be to the inspired wrote: "And an of the process of \,UJi'IIJllrfJ should not have been as faithfully transmitted and retained Reiteration, accompanied by a boundless from the Apostolic age to the Antiochian (i.e. exercise of the imaginative faculty, we have say, from A.D. 90 to A.D. 250-350)--i.e. reached the goal to which all that went before Many Westcott and Hort supporters throughout an interval of less than 250 years, has been steadily tending,' viz. the absolute claim that the text of our Textus Receptus kind or one-sixth of the period." [Dean John W. supremacy of codices B and Aleph above all of manuscripts is of a more recent date than Burgon, Revision Revised, pp. 295-96]. Dean other codices,--and when they differ, then of "B" and "Aleph." Westcott and Hort Burgon is saying clearly that God has codex B. And yet, the 'immunity from admitted: "The fundamental text of the late preserved His Words. substantive error' of a lost Codex of extant Greek MSS generally is, beyond all imaginary date and unknown history cannot 18. M@!!"e 1:E~~MO'JllJ'i!iIDte@1!'tJ@1f Il:he question, identical with (what Dr. Hort but be a pure imagination=-Ia mistaken one, chooses to call) the dominant Antiochian or as we shall presently show,)--of these Graeco-Syrian text of the second half of the respected Critics: while their proposed century ... The Aruiochian [Jean wrote: "Drs. Westcott and Ii to regard "athers. and the bulk of extant MSS, written Hort assume that this "Aruiochian text'--found ~ two remote and confessedly depraved Copies _ 'om about three or four, to ten or eleven in the later cursives and the Fathers of the of that original, as 'a safe criterion of centuries must have in the greater latter of the Il/th century=must be an :1 ')-- at all events, is the number of extant variations, a common artificial, an arbitrarily invented standard; a 'Ii! reverse of logical. In the meantime, the original either contemporary with, or older text fabricated between A.D. 250 and A.D. presumed proximity of the Text of Aleph and than, our oldest extant MSS." [Westcott & 350. And if they may but be sofortunate as to B to the Apostolic .age is henceforth Hort, Introduction to the Greek NT., p. 92. persuade the world to adopt their hypothesis, discoursed of as if it were no longer a matter quoted by Dean John W. Burgon, Revision ' then all will be easy,' for they will have of conjecture." [Dean John W. Burgon, Revised, p. 295]. Westcott and Hort admitted reduced the supposed 'consent of Fathers' to Revision Revised, p. 304]. forthrightly that the Textus Receptus text is a the reproduction of one and the same single :;g'f] • A~ i'E~~~ail"rlati@U'i@\{Why tlh~ 'primary documentary witness': ... " "Upset 4th century text. They explained this fact by Vat~cCiln «e'B) ~md tthle Sina~ (·'Ai~ its being the result of a rescensionlrevision the hypothesis on the other hand, and all is o eph .) Greek M~Il'u£l$crit))'/i:>l>$t!,mlN'ived made in 250 A.D. and again in 350 A.D. reversed in a moment. Every attesting Father Again, Westcott and Hort did not attempt to is perceived to be a dated MS. and an f@if $/il'l !b@6'lI!!Jja prove this, nor could they. It is merely a false independent authority; and the combined Dean Burgon wrote: "Lastly,--We hypothesis. evidence of several of these becomes simply suspect that these two Manuscripts are indebted for their preservation, solely to their 'u 8' 0 [Q)®<>lG1l unmanageable. In like manner, 'the ascertained evil character,' which has ~ihJ@~(il)tliJ@~ri~@]ilJ1 IlRUH\,!:ilIl \lr@@~ll:tt;@\'l:\l; approximate consent of the cursives' ... is perceived to be equivalent not to 'A occasioned that the one eventually found its 1ID1iilCQ'J tMl@ri'$ ~@lr[~H~$m@91l llilll Revised, p.319] This is a powerful argument. would you propose as an induction therefrom disregarded, if' they be but written in Dean Burgon here explains why it is that "B" that it was the fashion to wear minuscule characters,--wefail to understand. and "Aleph" were still in existence after so four-and-twenty fingers and toes on one's To ourselves it seems simply an irrational many centuries. hands and feet in the days of the giant of proceeding. ... As for building up a Text, (a 22. Previous Veneration of the Gath?" [Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Drs. Westcott and Hort have done) with-· Vatican (liB") and the Sinai ("AI- Revised, pp. 329-30] In logic, "induction" is special superstitious deference to a single the process whereby you take many particulars eph") Greek, Manuscripts. codex,--we deem it about as reasonable as and then arrive at a generalization or a would be the attempt to build up a pyramid Dean Burgan wrote: "Since 1881, universal drawn from those many particulars. Editors have vied with one another in the from its apex; in the expectation that it would From just one, two, or a few specimens, you fulsomeness of the homage they have paid to stand firm on its extremity, and remain cannot come to any valid generalization, these 'two false Witnesses, ' public will be no longer indifferent spectators Bible in an effort to make available the facts in '?f the fray; for the issue concerns the inner of the modem revised Greek Texts such as this area. James White's recent book opposes Nestle-Aland, United Bible Society and ife of the whole community,--touches men's these positions. In 1995, the Dean Burgon ~heart ofhearts .... GOD'S TRUTH will be, as others. Both groups (Westcott and Hort and Society reprinted, in perfect binding, their it has been throughout, the one object of all modem textual revisers) draw largely, if not 400-page edition of Dean Burgon's book, The exclusively, on the false readings of our striving." [Dean John W. Burgon, Last Twelve Verses of Mark. In December, Revision Revised, pp. 365-66] manuscripts "B" (Vatican) and "Aleph" 1996, the DEAN BURGON SOCIETY (Sinai). It is axiomatic that "things equal to a. Compromise not pos- published Dean Burgon's book, The Revision the same thing are equal to each other." sible. Some people might ask if this is Revised. This is a 640-page hardback.edition. C. The Excellence of The going to divide the church and separate us. The DEAN BURGON SOCIETY, at its Maybe it has come to that. Certainly, for annual meetings, has also contributed much Revision Revised. Dean Burgon, there can be no compromise. information on this theme throughout its This present book, The Revision Revised, Was Dean Burgon a fighter? Yes he was. He present eighteen years of existence. These is another of Dean John William Burgon's was a fighter for the right and for the very messages are all centered on the main theme, masterpieces. It contains, as do all of his Words of God. Shouldn't we of the Dean "IN DEFENSE OF TRADITIONAL BIBLE books, overwhelming evidence from Burgon Society, get Dean Burgon's spirit and TEXTS." The messages are available as audio manuscripts, lectionaries, ancient versions, also be fighters? Should we not be fighters for cassettes, video cassettes, and in writing in the and church fathers showing clearly three the right and for the very Words of God? DBS MESSAGE BOOKS. Many other writers deficiencies: (1) The deficient Greek Text of Yes, yes we should. for the side of the Masoretic Text, the Textus Westcott and Hort; (2) The deficient English translation based upon it; and(3) The deficient b. The Question Will Have Receptus, and the King James Bible position theory. underlying the Greek text. His To Be ·'Fought Out,,· Was young have contributed to this "public" educational mission, including, but not limited to the arguments are powerful and convincing! He David a fighter? Yes he was. Did David want following: Rev. David Cloud of the Way of also defends the Authorized Version. to fight? No. Did he come out to fight? No, Life Ministries; Dr. Jack Moorman, mis- D. The Revision Revised Can he just came out to bring his brothers some food when that giant, Goliath, came after him. ionary in Great Britain; Dr. Edward Hills; Mr. Be Used to Combat Current False We have Goliaths coming after us. Our Everett Fowler; Dr. Bob Barnett; D. A. Waite, Modem Versions. Jr.; Dr. D. A. Waite, Sr.; Dr. H. D. Williams; precious Textus Receptus, the Masoretic Text, In the way Dean Burgon repudiates the Dr. Sorensen, and many others. and our King James Bible are all under attack English Revised Version of 1881 and defends day. Yes, we do have Goliaths coming after v. CONCLUSION the Authorized King James Bible, this book ~us. will also form a strong basis for defending the A. The Revision Revised Can c. Tf!'8e Battle Must Be King James Bible against the modem versions Be Used to Combat Current false such as the ASV, RSV, NASV, NIV, TEV, Fought "fairly'" There is nothing in my Greek Texts. constitution that wants to be unfair. I want to NIV, NRSV, CEV, ESV, the footnotes in the There is no one book that exposes study edition.ofthe NKJV, and many others. fight only with truth. That's the only basis on Westcott and Hort's false Greek text and false which we can fight. I want to be kind, but I Greek theory behind that text any more About the Author want to be firm. I believe Dean Burgon's thoroughly and convincingly than The The author of this booklet, Dr. D. A. writings follow this path. The battle cannot be Revision Revised. Dean Burgon defends the Waite, received a B.A. (Bachelor of Arts) in decided by some judge who can declare one traditional text of the New Testament. He also classical Greek and Latin from the University side or the other as the winner. shows clearly the defects in both manuscript of Michigan in 1948, a Th.M. (Master of d. The "Public" Will Not Be "B" (Vatican) and manuscript "Aleph" (Sinai). Theology), with high honors, in New "Inifferent Spectators'" As Dean It is very important to see the arguments Testament Greek Literature and Exegesis from Burgon predicted, the "public" has indeed contained in this historic volume. Virtually Dallas Theological Seminary in 1952, an M.A. become interested in the battle for their Bible. the same Greek text of Westcott and Hort (Master of Arts) in Speech from Southern This is important. The "public" was aroused (1881) has been used for almost all of the Methodist University in 1953, a Th.D. (Doctor in his day, and it is being aroused today. As modem versions and perversions. As proof of of Theology), with honors, in Bible Exposition Dean Burgon reminded us, "GOD'S TRUTH" this, you can tum back to pages 2-3 for seven from Dallas Theological Seminary in 1955, must be the object of our striving in the Dean quotes that tie the Westcott and Hort's Greek and a Ph.D. in Speech from Purdue University Burgon Society. Consider some of the books text to that of Nestle-Aland and the United in 1961. He holds both New Jersey and that have been written to alert the general Bible Society. Therefore, The Revision Pennsylvania teacher certificates in Greek and public concerning this problem. Dr. David Revised forms a strong basis for a refutation Language Arts. Otis Fuller's books-- Which Bible, True or of the false Greek texts and theories rampant He has been a teacher in the areas of False, and Counterfeit or Genuine--greatly today which form the basis for the modem Greek, Hebrew, Bible, Speech, and English assisted in this project. D. A. Carson wrote English versions. for over thirty-five years in nine schools, ~qainst Dr. Fuller's position B. Why Westcott and Hort's including one junior high, one senior high, My own book, Defending the King Text Is So Similar to Current three Bible institutes, two colleges, two James Bible, has made an impact as well. universities, and one seminary. He served his Greek Texts. It is very easy to The BIBLE FOR TODAY has reprinted some country as a Navy Chaplain for five years on understand why the 1881 Greek Text of 900 titles in defense of the Masoretic Hebrew, active duty; pastored three churches; was Westcott and Hort is almost the same as that the Textus Receptus, and the King James Chairman and Director of the Radio and Audio-Film Commission of the American Difficulties.--The Word Of God Infallible.-- and (4) He defends the King James Bible! Council of Christian Churches; since 1971, Other Sciences Subordinate To Theological Order DIBS #6H for a gift of $25.00 + $5.01' has been Founder, President, and Director of Science.", "The Plenary Inspiration of Every S&lH!, Hardback book over 500 pages THE BIBLE FOR TODAY; since 1978, has Part of the Bible, Vindicated and Explained.-- 50 D!? ~' various topics; and is heard on both a that has been preserved from the first century five-minute daily and thirty-minute weekly and handling. Hardback book, over 300 pages. until the present. Dean Burgon shows the radio program IN DEFENSE OF superiority of this text and the inferiority of B' TRADITIONAL BIBLE TEXTS. Dr. and 2, A Guide t@ the Te.:$d:uaJ! and Aleph caJlI'ild @fchers. Order DBS Mrs. Waite have been married since 1948; rclfltlcii$m @f the New Te$tamel!lift. ~1115~ for a gijft{: @if ~.@l@oj? $5.0@ they have four sons, one daughter, and, at This book is by Rev. Edward Miller who was present, eight grandchildren and five great- a close friend and fellow worker with Dean S&Hl. lHJardbac~" Ibo@~{ @"®IJ 3\00 grandchildren. John W. Burgon. In this volume, Miller G\i)agll:Js condenses and sums up Dean Burgon's 6, ((;O!'lf1!iSW (;ill! S:;@mg~t!;U@(IffJ 1ZJ)f! methodology for textual criticism. In it he TtlrJf!j) 'if'1i"t?illiift!J@fliJEssays and Reviews" concerning inspiration by Dr. H. D. William Burgon. In this volume, Burgon does and interpretation of Scripture. The book the following four things: (1) He attacks the includes sermons on "The Study Of The Bible false Greek text of Westcott and Hort; (2) He book in the world shows translators how to" Recommended; And A Method Of Studying It demolishes the theory behind that text; (3) He properly translate God's Words. Order DBS/ Described", "Natural Science and Theological refutes the English Revised Version of 1881 BFT #3302 @ $10.00 + $5.00 S&H!. This Science", "Inspiration of Scripture.--Gospel book was just published in March, 2007.